{"after":"WzE3OTA0Njk3OTU3MzAsNzAuNTM0NiwwLCJkYjUxMGQ5Zi1hZTE3LTRiYzQtOTVlMS01OTRmNDBmYmYxODkiXQ==","results":[{"_score":50.994034,"_sort":[1790910200939,50.994034,3,"ce072083-3d60-446e-ae55-4434e132e84c"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Michelle A Stern","hasEmail":"mailto:mstern@usgs.gov"},"description":"This data release contains monthly 270-meter resolution Basin Characterization Model (BCMv8) climate and hydrologic variables for Localized Constructed Analog (LOCA; Pierce et al., 2014)-downscaled Global Climate Models (GCMs) for Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 4.5 (medium-low emissions) and 8.5 (high emissions) for hydrologic California. The 20 future climate scenarios consist of ten GCMs with RCP 4.5 and 8.5 each: ACCESS 1.0, CanESM2, CCSM4, CESM1-BGC, CMCC-CMS, CNRM-CM5, GFDL-CM3, HadGEM2-CC, HadGEM2-ES, and MIROC5. The LOCA climate scenarios span water years 1950 to 2099 with greenhouse-gas forcings beginning in 2006. The LOCA downscaling method has been shown to produce better estimates of extreme events and reduces the common downscaling problem of too many low-precipitation days (Pierce et al., 2014). Ten GCMs were selected from the full ensemble of models from the fifth Coupled Model Intercomparison Project from the World Climate Research Programme (CMIP5) based on GCM historical performance to address specific needs for California water-resource planning (California Department of Water Resources Climate Change Technical Advisory Group, 2015). The 10 GCMs with RCP 4.5 and 8.5 each were statistically downscaled using the LOCA method (Pierce et al., 2014) from 2-degree (approximately 222-kilometer; km) quadrangles to 6-km resolution. Next, the scenarios were spatially downscaled from 6 km to 270 meters (Flint and Flint, 2012) and run through the BCMv8 using the same model parameters and input files as the historical BCM model (BCMv8; Flint et al., 2021).\nDownscaled gridded climate variables include precipitation (ppt), minimum temperature (tmn), maximum temperature (tmx), and potential evapotranspiration (pet). Gridded hydrologic variables include actual evapotranspiration (aet), climatic water deficit (cwd), snowpack (pck), recharge (rch), runoff (run), and soil storage (str). The units for temperature variables are degrees Celsius, and all other variables are in millimeters per month. Monthly variables from water years 1951 to 2099 are summarized into water year files (for example, water year 1951 includes October 1950 - September 1951) and 30-year average summaries from 1951 to 2099. Raster grids are in the NAD83 California Teale Albers, (meters) projection in an open format ascii text file (*.asc). \nThis data release includes a child item for each GCM. Each GCM child item contains two RCP (4.5 &amp; 8.5) child items. Each RCP child item contains 4 child items:\n1. 30-year summaries (Water year files averaged for selected 30-year periods, zipped by variable)\n2. Monthly BCM hydrology variables (monthly BCM hydrology variables zipped by decade)\n3. Monthly climate variables (monthly climate variables zipped by decade)\n4. Water year summaries (monthly files summed (aet, cwd, pck, rch, run, str, pet, and ppt) or averaged (tmn and tmx) by water year, zipped by variable)\nReferences cited:\nCalifornia Department of Water Resources Climate Change Technical Advisory Group, 2015, Perspectives and guidance for climate change analysis: Sacramento, Calif., California Department of Water Resources Technical Information Record, 142 p.\nFlint, L.E., Flint, A.L., and Stern, M.A., 2021, The Basin Characterization Model - A monthly regional water balance software package (BCMv8) data release and model archive for hydrologic California (ver. 3.0, June 2023): U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P9PT36UI.\nFlint, L.E., and Flint, A.L., 2012, Downscaling future climate scenarios to fine scales for hydrologic and ecological modeling and analysis: Ecological Processes, v. 1, no. 2, 15 p., https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-1709-1-2.\nPierce, D.W., Cayan, D.R. and Thrasher, B.L., 2014. Statistical downscaling using localized constructed analogs (LOCA). Journal of hydrometeorology, 15(6), pp.2558-2585.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P9K23J25","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.61e069f3d34e8911d9fe9dba.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_61e069f3d34e8911d9fe9dba","keyword":["California","USGS:61e069f3d34e8911d9fe9dba","United States","atmospheric and climatic processes","climate change","climatologyMeteorologyAtmosphere","environment","evaporation","geoscientificInformation","geospatial datasets","hydrology","inlandWaters","mathematical modeling","permeability","precipitation (atmospheric)","snow and ice cover","soil moisture","streamflow","surface water (non-marine)","transpiration","water budget","water cycle","water resources","watershed management"],"modified":"2026-09-29T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-124.9805, 32.5300, -114.1200, 43.4210","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Future Climate and Hydrology from Twenty Localized Constructed Analog (LOCA) Scenarios and the Basin Characterization Model (BCMv8) (ver. 1.1, November 2024)"},"description":"This data release contains monthly 270-meter resolution Basin Characterization Model (BCMv8) climate and hydrologic variables for Localized Constructed Analog (LOCA; Pierce et al., 2014)-downscaled Global Climate Models (GCMs) for Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 4.5 (medium-low emissions) and 8.5 (high emissions) for hydrologic California. The 20 future climate scenarios consist of ten GCMs with RCP 4.5 and 8.5 each: ACCESS 1.0, CanESM2, CCSM4, CESM1-BGC, CMCC-CMS, CNRM-CM5, GFDL-CM3, HadGEM2-CC, HadGEM2-ES, and MIROC5. The LOCA climate scenarios span water years 1950 to 2099 with greenhouse-gas forcings beginning in 2006. The LOCA downscaling method has been shown to produce better estimates of extreme events and reduces the common downscaling problem of too many low-precipitation days (Pierce et al., 2014). Ten GCMs were selected from the full ensemble of models from the fifth Coupled Model Intercomparison Project from the World Climate Research Programme (CMIP5) based on GCM historical performance to address specific needs for California water-resource planning (California Department of Water Resources Climate Change Technical Advisory Group, 2015). The 10 GCMs with RCP 4.5 and 8.5 each were statistically downscaled using the LOCA method (Pierce et al., 2014) from 2-degree (approximately 222-kilometer; km) quadrangles to 6-km resolution. Next, the scenarios were spatially downscaled from 6 km to 270 meters (Flint and Flint, 2012) and run through the BCMv8 using the same model parameters and input files as the historical BCM model (BCMv8; Flint et al., 2021).\nDownscaled gridded climate variables include precipitation (ppt), minimum temperature (tmn), maximum temperature (tmx), and potential evapotranspiration (pet). Gridded hydrologic variables include actual evapotranspiration (aet), climatic water deficit (cwd), snowpack (pck), recharge (rch), runoff (run), and soil storage (str). The units for temperature variables are degrees Celsius, and all other variables are in millimeters per month. Monthly variables from water years 1951 to 2099 are summarized into water year files (for example, water year 1951 includes October 1950 - September 1951) and 30-year average summaries from 1951 to 2099. Raster grids are in the NAD83 California Teale Albers, (meters) projection in an open format ascii text file (*.asc). \nThis data release includes a child item for each GCM. Each GCM child item contains two RCP (4.5 &amp; 8.5) child items. Each RCP child item contains 4 child items:\n1. 30-year summaries (Water year files averaged for selected 30-year periods, zipped by variable)\n2. Monthly BCM hydrology variables (monthly BCM hydrology variables zipped by decade)\n3. Monthly climate variables (monthly climate variables zipped by decade)\n4. Water year summaries (monthly files summed (aet, cwd, pck, rch, run, str, pet, and ppt) or averaged (tmn and tmx) by water year, zipped by variable)\nReferences cited:\nCalifornia Department of Water Resources Climate Change Technical Advisory Group, 2015, Perspectives and guidance for climate change analysis: Sacramento, Calif., California Department of Water Resources Technical Information Record, 142 p.\nFlint, L.E., Flint, A.L., and Stern, M.A., 2021, The Basin Characterization Model - A monthly regional water balance software package (BCMv8) data release and model archive for hydrologic California (ver. 3.0, June 2023): U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P9PT36UI.\nFlint, L.E., and Flint, A.L., 2012, Downscaling future climate scenarios to fine scales for hydrologic and ecological modeling and analysis: Ecological Processes, v. 1, no. 2, 15 p., https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-1709-1-2.\nPierce, D.W., Cayan, D.R. and Thrasher, B.L., 2014. Statistical downscaling using localized constructed analogs (LOCA). Journal of hydrometeorology, 15(6), pp.2558-2585.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/623fc74d-3f20-4e29-9880-4b2f99351f63","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/623fc74d-3f20-4e29-9880-4b2f99351f63/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_61e069f3d34e8911d9fe9dba","keyword":["California","USGS:61e069f3d34e8911d9fe9dba","United States","atmospheric and climatic processes","climate change","climatologyMeteorologyAtmosphere","environment","evaporation","geoscientificInformation","geospatial datasets","hydrology","inlandWaters","mathematical modeling","permeability","precipitation (atmospheric)","snow and ice cover","soil moisture","streamflow","surface water (non-marine)","transpiration","water budget","water cycle","water resources","watershed management"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-10-02T03:03:20.939683","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":3,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"future-climate-and-hydrology-from-twenty-localized-constructed-analog-loca-scenarios--2024","spatial_centroid":{"lat":36.8864,"lon":-120.6363},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-124.9805,32.53],[-124.9805,43.421],[-114.12,43.421],[-114.12,32.53],[-124.9805,32.53]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Future Climate and Hydrology from Twenty Localized Constructed Analog (LOCA) Scenarios and the Basin Characterization Model (BCMv8) (ver. 1.1, November 2024)","type":"dataset"},{"_score":51.159595,"_sort":[1790909747668,51.159595,0,"e70d2755-b24d-4849-af73-9e8d8dab856a"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Lisa Gaines","hasEmail":"mailto:lisa.gaines@oregonstate.edu"},"description":"Management actions may have a higher probability of being successful if they are informed by available scientific knowledge and findings; a systematic review process provides a mechanism to scientifically assess management questions. By evaluating specific actions on scientific knowledge and findings, we may be able to increase management effectiveness and efficiency. The goal of the Available Science Assessment Project (ASAP) is to synthesize and evaluate the body of scientific knowledge on specific, on-the-ground CAAs to determine the conditions, timeframes, and geographic areas where particular CAAs may be most effective for resource managers. We have derived a methodology that utilizes interviews, a systematic review process, and extensive engagement with natural resource managers and scientists throughout the Northwest Climate Science Center (NW CSC) region. For a test case, we will evaluate the science behind specific fire management actions in national forests in the region.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P13M7JPQ","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.5818c1dfe4b0bb36a4c8806e.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_5818c1dfe4b0bb36a4c8806e","keyword":["Idaho","Oregon","USGS:5818c1dfe4b0bb36a4c8806e","Washington","adaptive management","climate change","datasets","decision support methods","environment","external research support","fire","fire management","fires","management methods","natural resource management"],"modified":"2026-09-29T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-124.6289, 41.8368, -111.0059, 48.9225","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Catalog of Fire-Related Climate Adaptation Actions: Phase 3 Literature Review"},"description":"Management actions may have a higher probability of being successful if they are informed by available scientific knowledge and findings; a systematic review process provides a mechanism to scientifically assess management questions. By evaluating specific actions on scientific knowledge and findings, we may be able to increase management effectiveness and efficiency. The goal of the Available Science Assessment Project (ASAP) is to synthesize and evaluate the body of scientific knowledge on specific, on-the-ground CAAs to determine the conditions, timeframes, and geographic areas where particular CAAs may be most effective for resource managers. We have derived a methodology that utilizes interviews, a systematic review process, and extensive engagement with natural resource managers and scientists throughout the Northwest Climate Science Center (NW CSC) region. For a test case, we will evaluate the science behind specific fire management actions in national forests in the region.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/d45168a7-3e0c-4ab2-9b97-dc001f1f6782","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/d45168a7-3e0c-4ab2-9b97-dc001f1f6782/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_5818c1dfe4b0bb36a4c8806e","keyword":["Idaho","Oregon","USGS:5818c1dfe4b0bb36a4c8806e","Washington","adaptive management","climate change","datasets","decision support methods","environment","external research support","fire","fire management","fires","management methods","natural resource management"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-10-02T02:55:47.668877","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"catalog-of-fire-related-climate-adaptation-actions-phase-3-literature-review","spatial_centroid":{"lat":44.671079999999996,"lon":-119.1797},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-124.6289,41.8368],[-124.6289,48.9225],[-111.0059,48.9225],[-111.0059,41.8368],[-124.6289,41.8368]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Catalog of Fire-Related Climate Adaptation Actions: Phase 3 Literature Review","type":"dataset"},{"_score":16.022568,"_sort":[1790909373549,16.022568,0,"94ef42de-1fd9-45e9-97b7-8a188aa8c2b1"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Matthew Maldonado","hasEmail":"mailto:steven.chipps@sdstate.edu"},"description":"Dataset contains angler effort information for waterbodies in North Dakota and South Dakota collected through creel surveys between 1991 - 2019. The dataset also contains waterbody surface area estimates for each sampled waterbody that were gathered through remote sensing. Finally, the dataset contains waterbody surface area estimates for all public, managed waterbodies within the Devils Lake Basin, North Dakota, USA between 2004 - 2021, along with the climate period that the Devils Lake BAsin was undergoing in a given year.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P13PVWKY","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.6a43c4ad1ba49b79e8251b28.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6a43c4ad1ba49b79e8251b28","keyword":["Angler Behavior","Ecology","Human Dimensions","USGS:6a43c4ad1ba49b79e8251b28","climatologyMeteorologyAtmosphere"],"modified":"2026-09-29T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-103.9746, 42.4883, -96.5500, 49.0000","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Remotely sensed waterbody surface area estimates and angler effort estimates in North Dakota and South Dakota between 1991 - 2021"},"description":"Dataset contains angler effort information for waterbodies in North Dakota and South Dakota collected through creel surveys between 1991 - 2019. The dataset also contains waterbody surface area estimates for each sampled waterbody that were gathered through remote sensing. Finally, the dataset contains waterbody surface area estimates for all public, managed waterbodies within the Devils Lake Basin, North Dakota, USA between 2004 - 2021, along with the climate period that the Devils Lake BAsin was undergoing in a given year.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/0b051c7f-f738-44ea-a762-7839e4093746","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/0b051c7f-f738-44ea-a762-7839e4093746/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6a43c4ad1ba49b79e8251b28","keyword":["Angler Behavior","Ecology","Human Dimensions","USGS:6a43c4ad1ba49b79e8251b28","climatologyMeteorologyAtmosphere"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-10-02T02:49:33.549289","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"remotely-sensed-waterbody-surface-area-estimates-and-angler-effort-estimates-in--1991-2021","spatial_centroid":{"lat":45.09298,"lon":-101.00476},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-103.9746,42.4883],[-103.9746,49.0],[-96.55,49.0],[-96.55,42.4883],[-103.9746,42.4883]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Remotely sensed waterbody surface area estimates and angler effort estimates in North Dakota and South Dakota between 1991 - 2021","type":"dataset"},{"_score":37.27526,"_sort":[1790908919811,37.27526,0,"56cf6a70-58bf-4eef-9b3c-00e681bcdd1a"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Guillaume Mauger","hasEmail":"mailto:gmauger@uw.edu"},"description":"This zipped file contains the model code, configuration files, and run scripts used to run the VIC model. All were developed by Mingliang liu at Washington State University (WSU).","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P13ICZXY","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.624f2b4fd34e21f82769b6ed.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_624f2b4fd34e21f82769b6ed","keyword":["USGS:624f2b4fd34e21f82769b6ed","adaptation","climate change","climatologyMeteorologyAtmosphere","culvert","inlandWaters","modeling","streamflow","structure"],"modified":"2026-09-29T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-124.78125, 45.53125, -116.90625, 49.03125","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"VIC model, configuration files, and run scripts for Washington State Culverts and Climate Change project"},"description":"This zipped file contains the model code, configuration files, and run scripts used to run the VIC model. All were developed by Mingliang liu at Washington State University (WSU).","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/93965a6d-2059-4c35-99f7-f33944df5629","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/93965a6d-2059-4c35-99f7-f33944df5629/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_624f2b4fd34e21f82769b6ed","keyword":["USGS:624f2b4fd34e21f82769b6ed","adaptation","climate change","climatologyMeteorologyAtmosphere","culvert","inlandWaters","modeling","streamflow","structure"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-10-02T02:41:59.811568","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"vic-model-configuration-files-and-run-scripts-for-washington-state-culverts-and-climate-ch","spatial_centroid":{"lat":46.93125,"lon":-121.63125},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-124.78125,45.53125],[-124.78125,49.03125],[-116.90625,49.03125],[-116.90625,45.53125],[-124.78125,45.53125]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"VIC model, configuration files, and run scripts for Washington State Culverts and Climate Change project","type":"dataset"},{"_score":7.197298,"_sort":[1790908364882,7.197298,0,"ebedf159-c2bb-429c-8686-a4d3b5abafde"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Robert C Klinger","hasEmail":"mailto:casc-data@usgs.gov"},"description":"Density estimates of four mammal species in the upper subalpine and alpine zones of the Sierra Nevada range, 2008 - 2012. The estimates were derived from variable distance data collected 3-4 per year along each of 21 transects (10 km in length). The transects were randomly selected from a pool of 53 potential routes. Nine transects were sampled in 2008, 12 were sampled in 2009, 19 were sampled in 2010, 21 were sampled in 2011, and 17 were sampled in 2012. All counts were done in July and August each year. Replicate samples within a given year were done within 2-8 days of each other. All counts were done by single observers. \nThe spreadsheet has six worksheets, including three with density estimates for each species at different scales, one worksheet with definitions of the fields, one worksheet with the species names, and a worksheet that defines the scale and units of the estimates in the five worksheets for density","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P1QZMNOE","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.54494827e4b0f888a81bb4e1.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_54494827e4b0f888a81bb4e1","keyword":["Abundance","Alpine","Belding's ground squirrel","Distance sampling","Golden-mantled ground squirrel","Habitat","Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest","Inyo National Forest","Line transect counts","Marmot","Occupancy","Pika","Sequoia &amp; Kings Canyon National Parks","Sierra National Forest","Sierra Nevada","Stanislaus National Forest","USGS:54494827e4b0f888a81bb4e1","Yosemite National Park","biota","climate"],"modified":"2026-09-29T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-120.3332, 35.9689, -117.7694, 38.7574","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"AllSpecies0812SNVTranDensity"},"description":"Density estimates of four mammal species in the upper subalpine and alpine zones of the Sierra Nevada range, 2008 - 2012. The estimates were derived from variable distance data collected 3-4 per year along each of 21 transects (10 km in length). The transects were randomly selected from a pool of 53 potential routes. Nine transects were sampled in 2008, 12 were sampled in 2009, 19 were sampled in 2010, 21 were sampled in 2011, and 17 were sampled in 2012. All counts were done in July and August each year. Replicate samples within a given year were done within 2-8 days of each other. All counts were done by single observers. \nThe spreadsheet has six worksheets, including three with density estimates for each species at different scales, one worksheet with definitions of the fields, one worksheet with the species names, and a worksheet that defines the scale and units of the estimates in the five worksheets for density","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/56947243-4500-40d2-bc1d-0514cfc1bc52","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/56947243-4500-40d2-bc1d-0514cfc1bc52/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_54494827e4b0f888a81bb4e1","keyword":["Abundance","Alpine","Belding's ground squirrel","Distance sampling","Golden-mantled ground squirrel","Habitat","Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest","Inyo National Forest","Line transect counts","Marmot","Occupancy","Pika","Sequoia &amp; Kings Canyon National Parks","Sierra National Forest","Sierra Nevada","Stanislaus National Forest","USGS:54494827e4b0f888a81bb4e1","Yosemite National Park","biota","climate"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-10-02T02:32:44.882282","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"allspecies0812snvtrandensity","spatial_centroid":{"lat":37.0843,"lon":-119.30768},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-120.3332,35.9689],[-120.3332,38.7574],[-117.7694,38.7574],[-117.7694,35.9689],[-120.3332,35.9689]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"AllSpecies0812SNVTranDensity","type":"dataset"},{"_score":6.536026,"_sort":[1790907919298,6.536026,0,"56770119-4e30-41a4-b0fe-7b43dc027357"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Richard D. Inman","hasEmail":"mailto:rdinman@usgs.gov"},"description":"This dataset contains raster layers of environmental characteristics used to predict habitat suitability for multiple species of perennial cactus and herbs in the arid southwest. These data were developed from Sentinel-2 imagery, a digital elevation model, and one obtained from the Google Earth Engine data catalog. These datasets can be used to model habitat suitability of species with distributions that are influenced by terrain and soil characteristics. These layers are grouped into 2 categories:\nsentinel.zip: this file includes each of the raster layers listed below, along with sentinel.xml\nbgsi_10m.tif: Sentinel Bare Ground Index (bgsi): bare soil index to identify barren ground (Nguyen et al. 2021).\nclay_10m.tif: Clay (clay): identify soils rich in Al-OH, such as those clay and sulphate minerals produced from hydrothermal fluids and associated with porphyry copper deposits and vegetation (Imbroane et al. 2007).\nFe2O3_10m.tif: Iron Oxide simple ratio (Fe203): Highlights surface soils that are rich in ferric iron oxide (limonite), for the hydrothermal alteration or the oxidation of Fe-Mg silicates (Imbroane et al., 2007).\nFerrous_10m.tif: Ferrous minerals simple ratio (ferrous): Highlights surface soils that are rich in ferrous iron (Imbroane et al., 2007).\ngyp_10m.tif: Gypsum simple ratio (gypsum): Highlights surface soils that are rich in gypsum (Radwin &amp; Bowen 2021).\nri_10m.tif: Rock index (ri): Highlights surface soils that are more likely to contain minerals (Imbroane et al. 2007).\nterrain.zip: this file includes each of the raster layers listed below, along with terrain.xml\nmtpi_10m.tif: Multi-Scale Topographic Position Index (mtpi): mTPI distinguishes ridge from valley forms. It is calculated using elevation data for each location subtracted by the mean elevation within a neighborhood. (Theobald et al. 2015)\ntwi_10m.tif: Terrain wetness index (twi): Describes how terrain controls hydrology and soil moisture and identifies potential zones of water accumulation, runoff generation, and soil saturation based entirely on a digital elevation model (Moore et al. 1991)\nchili_10m.tif: Continuous Heat-Insolation Load Index (chili): surrogate for effects of insolation and topographic shading on evapotranspiration represented by calculating insolation at early afternoon, sun altitude equivalent to equinox (Theobald et al. 2015).\nAll layers were produced as geotiff raster files. \nReferences:\nImbroane, M. A., Melenti, C. and Gorgan, D. \"Mineral Explorations by Landsat Image Ratios,\" Ninth International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing (SYNASC 2007), Timisoara, Romania, 2007, pp. 335-340, doi: 10.1109/SYNASC.2007.52\nMoore, I.D., R.B. Grayson, and A.R. Ladson, 1991. Digital Terrain Modeling: A Review of Hydrological, Geomorphological, and Biological Applications. Hydrological Processes 5:3-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360050103\nNguyen, C.T., Chidthaisong A., Diem, P.K., Huo, L. 2021. A Modified Bare Soil Index to Identify Bare Land Features during Agricultural Fallow-Period in Southeast Asia Using Landsat 8. 10, 231. Page 3. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/3/231/pdf, https://doi.org/10.3390/land10030231\nRadwin, M. and Bowen, B. B. 2021. \"Mapping mineralogy in evaporite basins through time using multispectral Landsat Data: Examples from the Bonneville Basin, Utah, USA.\" Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 46(6), 1111-1126. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5089.\nTheobald, D. M., Harrison-Atlas, D., Monahan, W. B., and Albano, C. M. 2015. Ecologically-relevant maps of landforms and physiographic diversity for climate adaptation planning. PloS one, 10(12), e0143619. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143619","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P1KDBQS6","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.6aa0718c1ba49bc75115293d.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6aa0718c1ba49bc75115293d","keyword":["Species Distribution Modeling","USGS:6aa0718c1ba49bc75115293d","biogeography","biota","digital elevation models","environmental predictors","habitat suitability","maps and atlases","remote sensing","spatial analysis"],"modified":"2026-09-29T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-111.9727, 28.3157, -100.3755, 39.1661","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Fine-scale Habitat Environmental Predictor Layers for rare Cacti and Herbaceous Plants in the Arid Southwest"},"description":"This dataset contains raster layers of environmental characteristics used to predict habitat suitability for multiple species of perennial cactus and herbs in the arid southwest. These data were developed from Sentinel-2 imagery, a digital elevation model, and one obtained from the Google Earth Engine data catalog. These datasets can be used to model habitat suitability of species with distributions that are influenced by terrain and soil characteristics. These layers are grouped into 2 categories:\nsentinel.zip: this file includes each of the raster layers listed below, along with sentinel.xml\nbgsi_10m.tif: Sentinel Bare Ground Index (bgsi): bare soil index to identify barren ground (Nguyen et al. 2021).\nclay_10m.tif: Clay (clay): identify soils rich in Al-OH, such as those clay and sulphate minerals produced from hydrothermal fluids and associated with porphyry copper deposits and vegetation (Imbroane et al. 2007).\nFe2O3_10m.tif: Iron Oxide simple ratio (Fe203): Highlights surface soils that are rich in ferric iron oxide (limonite), for the hydrothermal alteration or the oxidation of Fe-Mg silicates (Imbroane et al., 2007).\nFerrous_10m.tif: Ferrous minerals simple ratio (ferrous): Highlights surface soils that are rich in ferrous iron (Imbroane et al., 2007).\ngyp_10m.tif: Gypsum simple ratio (gypsum): Highlights surface soils that are rich in gypsum (Radwin &amp; Bowen 2021).\nri_10m.tif: Rock index (ri): Highlights surface soils that are more likely to contain minerals (Imbroane et al. 2007).\nterrain.zip: this file includes each of the raster layers listed below, along with terrain.xml\nmtpi_10m.tif: Multi-Scale Topographic Position Index (mtpi): mTPI distinguishes ridge from valley forms. It is calculated using elevation data for each location subtracted by the mean elevation within a neighborhood. (Theobald et al. 2015)\ntwi_10m.tif: Terrain wetness index (twi): Describes how terrain controls hydrology and soil moisture and identifies potential zones of water accumulation, runoff generation, and soil saturation based entirely on a digital elevation model (Moore et al. 1991)\nchili_10m.tif: Continuous Heat-Insolation Load Index (chili): surrogate for effects of insolation and topographic shading on evapotranspiration represented by calculating insolation at early afternoon, sun altitude equivalent to equinox (Theobald et al. 2015).\nAll layers were produced as geotiff raster files. \nReferences:\nImbroane, M. A., Melenti, C. and Gorgan, D. \"Mineral Explorations by Landsat Image Ratios,\" Ninth International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing (SYNASC 2007), Timisoara, Romania, 2007, pp. 335-340, doi: 10.1109/SYNASC.2007.52\nMoore, I.D., R.B. Grayson, and A.R. Ladson, 1991. Digital Terrain Modeling: A Review of Hydrological, Geomorphological, and Biological Applications. Hydrological Processes 5:3-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360050103\nNguyen, C.T., Chidthaisong A., Diem, P.K., Huo, L. 2021. A Modified Bare Soil Index to Identify Bare Land Features during Agricultural Fallow-Period in Southeast Asia Using Landsat 8. 10, 231. Page 3. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/3/231/pdf, https://doi.org/10.3390/land10030231\nRadwin, M. and Bowen, B. B. 2021. \"Mapping mineralogy in evaporite basins through time using multispectral Landsat Data: Examples from the Bonneville Basin, Utah, USA.\" Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 46(6), 1111-1126. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5089.\nTheobald, D. M., Harrison-Atlas, D., Monahan, W. B., and Albano, C. M. 2015. Ecologically-relevant maps of landforms and physiographic diversity for climate adaptation planning. PloS one, 10(12), e0143619. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143619","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/a7e857f9-b15e-4c22-bb41-aac8a58b04a3","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/a7e857f9-b15e-4c22-bb41-aac8a58b04a3/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6aa0718c1ba49bc75115293d","keyword":["Species Distribution Modeling","USGS:6aa0718c1ba49bc75115293d","biogeography","biota","digital elevation models","environmental predictors","habitat suitability","maps and atlases","remote sensing","spatial analysis"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-10-02T02:25:19.298374","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"fine-scale-habitat-environmental-predictor-layers-for-rare-cacti-and-herbaceous-plants-in-","spatial_centroid":{"lat":32.655860000000004,"lon":-107.33382000000002},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-111.9727,28.3157],[-111.9727,39.1661],[-100.3755,39.1661],[-100.3755,28.3157],[-111.9727,28.3157]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Fine-scale Habitat Environmental Predictor Layers for rare Cacti and Herbaceous Plants in the Arid Southwest","type":"dataset"},{"_score":62.176643,"_sort":[1790907844988,62.176643,0,"0ef470a9-a876-47ec-a250-d4a35372ee61"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Lisa Gaines","hasEmail":"mailto:lisa.gaines@oregonstate.edu"},"description":"EcoAdapt staff located and compiled relevant gray literature from Northwest national forests (e.g., forest management plans, fire management plans and policies, climate change strategy documents) written between 1986-2015, and categorized the ways in which fire-related climate adaptation actions appear in these documents.\nA coding system was created to review and catalog how climate adaptation actions appear in each document. Each document was reviewed and scored based on a 0-2 scale with 0 indicating no presence of climate adaptation action(s) within the document, 1 indicating presence of climate adaptation action(s) within the document, and 2 indicating climate adaptation action(s) are the focus/priority of the document. Each document was reviewed by 2 staff.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P13AP9LU","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.574dfc46e4b07e28b66901f4.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_574dfc46e4b07e28b66901f4","keyword":["Idaho","Oregon","USGS:574dfc46e4b07e28b66901f4","Washington","adaptive management","climate change","datasets","decision support methods","environment","external research support","fire","fires","forests","management methods","natural resource management"],"modified":"2026-09-29T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-124.1455, 41.9677, -110.7422, 49.0379","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Catalog of Fire-Related Climate Adaptation Actions: Phase 2 Literature Review"},"description":"EcoAdapt staff located and compiled relevant gray literature from Northwest national forests (e.g., forest management plans, fire management plans and policies, climate change strategy documents) written between 1986-2015, and categorized the ways in which fire-related climate adaptation actions appear in these documents.\nA coding system was created to review and catalog how climate adaptation actions appear in each document. Each document was reviewed and scored based on a 0-2 scale with 0 indicating no presence of climate adaptation action(s) within the document, 1 indicating presence of climate adaptation action(s) within the document, and 2 indicating climate adaptation action(s) are the focus/priority of the document. Each document was reviewed by 2 staff.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/2a3f08e7-ba9e-4498-bd7a-f6a1049fe138","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/2a3f08e7-ba9e-4498-bd7a-f6a1049fe138/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_574dfc46e4b07e28b66901f4","keyword":["Idaho","Oregon","USGS:574dfc46e4b07e28b66901f4","Washington","adaptive management","climate change","datasets","decision support methods","environment","external research support","fire","fires","forests","management methods","natural resource management"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-10-02T02:24:04.988276","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"catalog-of-fire-related-climate-adaptation-actions-phase-2-literature-review","spatial_centroid":{"lat":44.79578,"lon":-118.78417999999999},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-124.1455,41.9677],[-124.1455,49.0379],[-110.7422,49.0379],[-110.7422,41.9677],[-124.1455,41.9677]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Catalog of Fire-Related Climate Adaptation Actions: Phase 2 Literature Review","type":"dataset"},{"_score":26.564568,"_sort":[1790906600356,26.564568,1,"b515c188-fc68-4884-af7e-8e2f9fa02562"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Lisa Gaines","hasEmail":"mailto:lisa.gaines@oregonstate.edu"},"description":"Spreadsheet of literature used in systematic review of sea level rise actions. Spreadsheet contains a catalog of gray literature with classification in various ways, including a 5 point scale for identifying the presence and prioritization of specific climate adaptation actions.  There is also a summary of scores under these final columns.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P14LV8BM","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.f8fa6b49-e074-499d-afb9-8f4b289c47b4.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_f8fa6b49-e074-499d-afb9-8f4b289c47b4","keyword":["Coastal California (north of Cape Mendocino)","Coastal Oregon","Coastal Washington State","Pacific Northwest","USGS:f8fa6b49-e074-499d-afb9-8f4b289c47b4","biota","climate adaptation","external research support","sea level rise","sea-level change"],"modified":"2026-08-24T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-125.0684, 40.2124, -122.0361, 49.2965","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Sea Level Rise Systematic Mapping Literature Review"},"description":"Spreadsheet of literature used in systematic review of sea level rise actions. Spreadsheet contains a catalog of gray literature with classification in various ways, including a 5 point scale for identifying the presence and prioritization of specific climate adaptation actions.  There is also a summary of scores under these final columns.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/24bad5a1-69cc-45b0-9256-1d0e4ebfcfd4","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/24bad5a1-69cc-45b0-9256-1d0e4ebfcfd4/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_f8fa6b49-e074-499d-afb9-8f4b289c47b4","keyword":["Coastal California (north of Cape Mendocino)","Coastal Oregon","Coastal Washington State","Pacific Northwest","USGS:f8fa6b49-e074-499d-afb9-8f4b289c47b4","biota","climate adaptation","external research support","sea level rise","sea-level change"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-10-02T02:03:20.356848","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":1,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"sea-level-rise-systematic-mapping-literature-review","spatial_centroid":{"lat":43.84604,"lon":-123.85547999999999},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-125.0684,40.2124],[-125.0684,49.2965],[-122.0361,49.2965],[-122.0361,40.2124],[-125.0684,40.2124]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Sea Level Rise Systematic Mapping Literature Review","type":"dataset"},{"_score":6.4337797,"_sort":[1790906431128,6.4337797,0,"9a659b97-b351-462a-bdfa-a566225ffd9b"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Climate Adaptation Science Centers","hasEmail":"mailto:casc-data@usgs.gov"},"description":"The estimates were derived from variable distance data collected 3-4 times per year at point count stations randomly located along line transects. Density Estimates from Line Transect Sampling (individuals per km^2): Density estimates of four mammal species in the upper subalpine and alpine zones of the Sierra Nevada range, 2008 - 2012. The estimates were derived from variable distance data collected 3-4 per year along each of 21 transects (10 km in length). The transects were randomly selected from a pool of 53 potential routes. Nine transects were sampled in 2008, 12 were sampled in 2009, 19 were sampled in 2010, 21 were sampled in 2011, and 17 were sampled in 2012. All counts were done in July and August each year. Replicate samples within a given year were done within 2-8 days of each other. All counts were done by single observers. The spreadsheet has six worksheets, including three with density estimates for each species at different scales, one worksheet with definitions of the fields, one worksheet with the species names, and a worksheet that defines the scale and units of the estimates in the five worksheets for density Density Estimates from Point Count Sampling (individuals per hectare): There were 21 transects (10 km in length) that had been randomly selected from a pool of 53 potential routes, with 10 point count stations along each transect (minimum of 200 m spacing between stations). 45 stations were sampled in 2008 (5 stations on each of 9 transects), 60 stations were sampled in 2009 (5 stations on each of 12 transects),190 stations were sampled in 2010 (10 stations on each of 19 transects), 210 stations were sampled in 2011 (10 stations on each of 19 transects), and 170 stations were sampled in 2012 (10 stations on each of 17 transects). All counts were done in July and August each year. Replicate samples within a given year were done within 2-8 days of each other. All counts were done by single observers.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P1QZMNOE","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.544947aee4b0f888a81bb4df.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_544947aee4b0f888a81bb4df","keyword":["Belding's ground squirrel","Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest","Inyo National Forest","Pika","Sequoia &amp; Kings Canyon National Parks","Sierra National Forest","Sierra Nevada","Stanislaus National Forest","USGS:544947aee4b0f888a81bb4df","Yosemite National Park","abundance","alpine","atmospheric and climatic processes","biota","climate","distance sampling","environment","field inventory and monitoring","geospatial datasets","golden-mantled ground squirrel","habitats","marmot","occupancy","point counts","relative abundance analysis","statistical analysis","wildlife"],"modified":"2026-09-29T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-121.8823, 35.2187, -117.0813, 40.7306","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Density estimates of four mammal species in the upper subalpine and alpine zones of the Sierra Nevada range, 2008 - 2012"},"description":"The estimates were derived from variable distance data collected 3-4 times per year at point count stations randomly located along line transects. Density Estimates from Line Transect Sampling (individuals per km^2): Density estimates of four mammal species in the upper subalpine and alpine zones of the Sierra Nevada range, 2008 - 2012. The estimates were derived from variable distance data collected 3-4 per year along each of 21 transects (10 km in length). The transects were randomly selected from a pool of 53 potential routes. Nine transects were sampled in 2008, 12 were sampled in 2009, 19 were sampled in 2010, 21 were sampled in 2011, and 17 were sampled in 2012. All counts were done in July and August each year. Replicate samples within a given year were done within 2-8 days of each other. All counts were done by single observers. The spreadsheet has six worksheets, including three with density estimates for each species at different scales, one worksheet with definitions of the fields, one worksheet with the species names, and a worksheet that defines the scale and units of the estimates in the five worksheets for density Density Estimates from Point Count Sampling (individuals per hectare): There were 21 transects (10 km in length) that had been randomly selected from a pool of 53 potential routes, with 10 point count stations along each transect (minimum of 200 m spacing between stations). 45 stations were sampled in 2008 (5 stations on each of 9 transects), 60 stations were sampled in 2009 (5 stations on each of 12 transects),190 stations were sampled in 2010 (10 stations on each of 19 transects), 210 stations were sampled in 2011 (10 stations on each of 19 transects), and 170 stations were sampled in 2012 (10 stations on each of 17 transects). All counts were done in July and August each year. Replicate samples within a given year were done within 2-8 days of each other. All counts were done by single observers.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/e7c263da-055d-4278-bd2e-974f06d9b20c","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/e7c263da-055d-4278-bd2e-974f06d9b20c/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_544947aee4b0f888a81bb4df","keyword":["Belding's ground squirrel","Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest","Inyo National Forest","Pika","Sequoia &amp; Kings Canyon National Parks","Sierra National Forest","Sierra Nevada","Stanislaus National Forest","USGS:544947aee4b0f888a81bb4df","Yosemite National Park","abundance","alpine","atmospheric and climatic processes","biota","climate","distance sampling","environment","field inventory and monitoring","geospatial datasets","golden-mantled ground squirrel","habitats","marmot","occupancy","point counts","relative abundance analysis","statistical analysis","wildlife"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-10-02T02:00:31.128819","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"density-estimates-of-four-mammal-species-in-the-upper-subalpine-and-alpine-zones-2008-2012","spatial_centroid":{"lat":37.42346,"lon":-119.96189999999999},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-121.8823,35.2187],[-121.8823,40.7306],[-117.0813,40.7306],[-117.0813,35.2187],[-121.8823,35.2187]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Density estimates of four mammal species in the upper subalpine and alpine zones of the Sierra Nevada range, 2008 - 2012","type":"dataset"},{"_score":9.888755,"_sort":[1790821374605,9.888755,0,"0fcde80b-3a68-4639-8f70-7053cead0e68"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Guillaume Mauger","hasEmail":"mailto:gmauger@uw.edu"},"description":"This dataset contains netcdf files with the peak flow statistics associated with culvert design, for the state of Washington.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P13U2YZ2","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.624f2a6ad34e21f82769b53f.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_624f2a6ad34e21f82769b53f","keyword":["USGS:624f2a6ad34e21f82769b53f","adaptation","biota","climate change","culvert","environment","geospatial datasets","inland waterways","streamflow","structure"],"modified":"2026-09-28T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-124.7600, 45.5400, -116.9100, 49.0000","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Historical and Future Peak Flow Statistics for Washington State, derived from VIC modeling and Dynamically Downscaled CMIP5 Projections"},"description":"This dataset contains netcdf files with the peak flow statistics associated with culvert design, for the state of Washington.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/5a7bbeca-8b64-47a0-ac98-a93f39e078e0","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/5a7bbeca-8b64-47a0-ac98-a93f39e078e0/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_624f2a6ad34e21f82769b53f","keyword":["USGS:624f2a6ad34e21f82769b53f","adaptation","biota","climate change","culvert","environment","geospatial datasets","inland waterways","streamflow","structure"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-10-01T02:22:54.605698","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"historical-and-future-peak-flow-statistics-for-washington-state-derived-from-vic-modeling-","spatial_centroid":{"lat":46.924,"lon":-121.62},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-124.76,45.54],[-124.76,49.0],[-116.91,49.0],[-116.91,45.54],[-124.76,45.54]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Historical and Future Peak Flow Statistics for Washington State, derived from VIC modeling and Dynamically Downscaled CMIP5 Projections","type":"dataset"},{"_score":21.778715,"_sort":[1790819576520,21.778715,1,"53cc3307-b797-44bd-b4a8-a54bed47446f"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Michael Osland","hasEmail":"mailto:mosland@usgs.gov"},"description":"The northern Gulf of Mexico coast spans two major climate gradients and represents an excellent natural laboratory for developing climate-influenced ecological models. In this project, we used these zones of remarkable transition to develop macroclimate-based models for quantifying the regional responses of coastal wetland ecosystems to climate variation. In addition to providing important fish and wildlife habitat and supporting coastal food webs, these coastal wetlands provide many ecosystem goods and services including clean water, stable coastlines, food, recreational opportunities, and stored carbon. Our objective was to examine and forecast the effects of macroclimatic drivers on wetland ecosystem structure and function in the northern Gulf of Mexico.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.5066/F7J1017G","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.57b240fce4b00148d3982cd0.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_57b240fce4b00148d3982cd0","keyword":["Corpus Christi","Galveston","Grand Bay","Gulf of Mexico","Laguna Madre","Port Aransas","San Antonio","Slidell","State of Alabama","State of Florida","State of Louisiana","State of Mississippi","State of Texas","Tampa Bay","Ten Thousand Islands","USGS:57b240fce4b00148d3982cd0","Weeks Bay","bulk density","environment","moisture","soil","soil organic matter"],"modified":"2026-09-28T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-97.365203, 25.856967, -81.499719, 30.497478","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"U.S. Gulf of Mexico coast (TX, MS, AL, and FL) Macroclimate Soil Data (2013-2014)"},"description":"The northern Gulf of Mexico coast spans two major climate gradients and represents an excellent natural laboratory for developing climate-influenced ecological models. In this project, we used these zones of remarkable transition to develop macroclimate-based models for quantifying the regional responses of coastal wetland ecosystems to climate variation. In addition to providing important fish and wildlife habitat and supporting coastal food webs, these coastal wetlands provide many ecosystem goods and services including clean water, stable coastlines, food, recreational opportunities, and stored carbon. Our objective was to examine and forecast the effects of macroclimatic drivers on wetland ecosystem structure and function in the northern Gulf of Mexico.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/d5e76c02-3210-44c3-ae21-53d506c89818","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/d5e76c02-3210-44c3-ae21-53d506c89818/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_57b240fce4b00148d3982cd0","keyword":["Corpus Christi","Galveston","Grand Bay","Gulf of Mexico","Laguna Madre","Port Aransas","San Antonio","Slidell","State of Alabama","State of Florida","State of Louisiana","State of Mississippi","State of Texas","Tampa Bay","Ten Thousand Islands","USGS:57b240fce4b00148d3982cd0","Weeks Bay","bulk density","environment","moisture","soil","soil organic matter"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-10-01T01:52:56.520198","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":1,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"u-s-gulf-of-mexico-coast-tx-ms-al-and-fl-macroclimate-soil-data-2013-2014","spatial_centroid":{"lat":27.7131714,"lon":-91.01900939999999},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-97.365203,25.856967],[-97.365203,30.497478],[-81.499719,30.497478],[-81.499719,25.856967],[-97.365203,25.856967]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"U.S. Gulf of Mexico coast (TX, MS, AL, and FL) Macroclimate Soil Data (2013-2014)","type":"dataset"},{"_score":28.884523,"_sort":[1790819268479,28.884523,0,"f586ed7a-8c6d-49e3-a23e-32fa2e94843b"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Michael Osland","hasEmail":"mailto:mosland@usgs.gov"},"description":"The northern Gulf of Mexico coast spans a dramatic water availability gradient (precipitation range: 700 to 1800 mm/year) and represents an excellent natural laboratory for developing climate-influenced ecological models for natural resource managers and culture keepers. In this project, we used this zone of remarkable transition to develop macroclimate-based models for quantifying the regional responses of coastal wetland ecosystems to climate variation. In addition to providing important fish and wildlife habitat and supporting coastal food webs, these coastal wetlands provide many ecosystem goods and services including clean water, stable coastlines, food, recreational opportunities, and stored carbon. Our objective was to examine and forecast the effects of macroclimatic drivers on wetland ecosystem structure and function in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Our first major step in meeting this overall objective was to develop a quantitative understanding of the connections between climate and ecosystem structure. We then incorporated the resulting information into quantitative vulnerability assessments that examine sensitivity (via observed data), exposure (via alternative future climate scenarios), and adaptive capacity (via life history literature). In the process, we identified regional climate-ecological thresholds for coastal wetland ecosystems. Our study focused on coastal wetland variations across relatively dramatic precipitation and temperature gradients in the northern Gulf of Mexico and included study areas in TX, LA, MS, AL, and FL. The project provided valuable experience and opportunities for five early-career researchers (one post-doctoral fellow, two current or recent undergraduate students, and two early-career research scientists).","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/F7J1017G","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.5731fbace4b0dae0d5dc1e59.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_5731fbace4b0dae0d5dc1e59","keyword":["Corpus Christi","Galveston","Grand Bay","Gulf of Mexico","Laguna Madre","Port Aransas","San Antonio","Slidell","State of Alabama","State of Florida","State of Louisiana","State of Mississippi","State of Texas","Tampa Bay","Ten Thousand Islands","USGS:5731fbace4b0dae0d5dc1e59","Weeks Bay","biota","climate","elevation","landscape","latitude","longitude"],"modified":"2026-09-28T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-97.6907, 25.8567, -81.5252, 30.4376","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"U.S. Gulf of Mexico coast (TX, MS, AL, and FL) Vegetation, soil, and landscape data (2013-2014)"},"description":"The northern Gulf of Mexico coast spans a dramatic water availability gradient (precipitation range: 700 to 1800 mm/year) and represents an excellent natural laboratory for developing climate-influenced ecological models for natural resource managers and culture keepers. In this project, we used this zone of remarkable transition to develop macroclimate-based models for quantifying the regional responses of coastal wetland ecosystems to climate variation. In addition to providing important fish and wildlife habitat and supporting coastal food webs, these coastal wetlands provide many ecosystem goods and services including clean water, stable coastlines, food, recreational opportunities, and stored carbon. Our objective was to examine and forecast the effects of macroclimatic drivers on wetland ecosystem structure and function in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Our first major step in meeting this overall objective was to develop a quantitative understanding of the connections between climate and ecosystem structure. We then incorporated the resulting information into quantitative vulnerability assessments that examine sensitivity (via observed data), exposure (via alternative future climate scenarios), and adaptive capacity (via life history literature). In the process, we identified regional climate-ecological thresholds for coastal wetland ecosystems. Our study focused on coastal wetland variations across relatively dramatic precipitation and temperature gradients in the northern Gulf of Mexico and included study areas in TX, LA, MS, AL, and FL. The project provided valuable experience and opportunities for five early-career researchers (one post-doctoral fellow, two current or recent undergraduate students, and two early-career research scientists).","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/176cae11-99e9-4bcc-afc4-3cd6d6c97d74","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/176cae11-99e9-4bcc-afc4-3cd6d6c97d74/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_5731fbace4b0dae0d5dc1e59","keyword":["Corpus Christi","Galveston","Grand Bay","Gulf of Mexico","Laguna Madre","Port Aransas","San Antonio","Slidell","State of Alabama","State of Florida","State of Louisiana","State of Mississippi","State of Texas","Tampa Bay","Ten Thousand Islands","USGS:5731fbace4b0dae0d5dc1e59","Weeks Bay","biota","climate","elevation","landscape","latitude","longitude"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-10-01T01:47:48.479583","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"u-s-gulf-of-mexico-coast-tx-ms-al-and-fl-vegetation-soil-and-landscape-data-2013-2014","spatial_centroid":{"lat":27.68906,"lon":-91.2245},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-97.6907,25.8567],[-97.6907,30.4376],[-81.5252,30.4376],[-81.5252,25.8567],[-97.6907,25.8567]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"U.S. Gulf of Mexico coast (TX, MS, AL, and FL) Vegetation, soil, and landscape data (2013-2014)","type":"dataset"},{"_score":54.907852,"_sort":[1790819048831,54.907852,3,"7171d0a8-bfc0-42b5-8048-03ca719df3d4"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Michael Osland","hasEmail":"mailto:mosland@usgs.gov"},"description":"The northern Gulf of Mexico coast spans two major climate gradients and represents an excellent natural laboratory for developing climate-influenced ecological models. In this project, we used these zones of remarkable transition to develop macroclimate-based models for quantifying the regional responses of coastal wetland ecosystems to climate variation. In addition to providing important fish and wildlife habitat and supporting coastal food webs, these coastal wetlands provide many ecosystem goods and services including clean water, stable coastlines, food, recreational opportunities, and stored carbon. Our objective was to examine and forecast the effects of macroclimatic drivers on wetland ecosystem structure and function in the northern Gulf of Mexico.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.5066/F7J1017G","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.57b24094e4b00148d3982cce.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_57b24094e4b00148d3982cce","keyword":["Corpus Christi","Galveston","Grand Bay","Gulf of Mexico","Laguna Madre","Port Aransas","San Antonio","Slidell","State of Alabama","State of Florida","State of Louisiana","State of Mississippi","State of Texas","Tampa Bay","Ten Thousand Islands","USGS:57b24094e4b00148d3982cce","Weeks Bay","climate","elevation","landscape","latitude","longitude"],"modified":"2026-09-28T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-97.69067328, 25.85667755, -81.52517775, 30.43761712","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"U.S. Gulf of Mexico coast (TX, MS, AL, and FL) Macroclimate Landscape and Climate Data (2013-2014)"},"description":"The northern Gulf of Mexico coast spans two major climate gradients and represents an excellent natural laboratory for developing climate-influenced ecological models. In this project, we used these zones of remarkable transition to develop macroclimate-based models for quantifying the regional responses of coastal wetland ecosystems to climate variation. In addition to providing important fish and wildlife habitat and supporting coastal food webs, these coastal wetlands provide many ecosystem goods and services including clean water, stable coastlines, food, recreational opportunities, and stored carbon. Our objective was to examine and forecast the effects of macroclimatic drivers on wetland ecosystem structure and function in the northern Gulf of Mexico.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/99d9b25a-44c7-43f7-ae7f-f375fe2abc82","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/99d9b25a-44c7-43f7-ae7f-f375fe2abc82/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_57b24094e4b00148d3982cce","keyword":["Corpus Christi","Galveston","Grand Bay","Gulf of Mexico","Laguna Madre","Port Aransas","San Antonio","Slidell","State of Alabama","State of Florida","State of Louisiana","State of Mississippi","State of Texas","Tampa Bay","Ten Thousand Islands","USGS:57b24094e4b00148d3982cce","Weeks Bay","climate","elevation","landscape","latitude","longitude"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-10-01T01:44:08.831133","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":3,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"u-s-gulf-of-mexico-coast-tx-ms-al-and-fl-macroclimate-landscape-and-climate-data-2013-2014","spatial_centroid":{"lat":27.689053378,"lon":-91.22447506799999},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-97.69067328,25.85667755],[-97.69067328,30.43761712],[-81.52517775,30.43761712],[-81.52517775,25.85667755],[-97.69067328,25.85667755]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"U.S. Gulf of Mexico coast (TX, MS, AL, and FL) Macroclimate Landscape and Climate Data (2013-2014)","type":"dataset"},{"_score":21.678726,"_sort":[1790818927685,21.678726,3,"a5ff12e3-ae64-42e5-b5f9-73697a150cef"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Michael Osland","hasEmail":"mailto:mosland@usgs.gov"},"description":"The northern Gulf of Mexico coast spans two major climate gradients and represents an excellent natural laboratory for developing climate-influenced ecological models. In this project, we used these zones of remarkable transition to develop macroclimate-based models for quantifying the regional responses of coastal wetland ecosystems to climate variation. In addition to providing important fish and wildlife habitat and supporting coastal food webs, these coastal wetlands provide many ecosystem goods and services including clean water, stable coastlines, food, recreational opportunities, and stored carbon. Our objective was to examine and forecast the effects of macroclimatic drivers on wetland ecosystem structure and function in the northern Gulf of Mexico.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.5066/F7J1017G","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.57aa11efe4b05e859be06932.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_57aa11efe4b05e859be06932","keyword":["Corpus Christi","Galveston","Grand Bay","Gulf of Mexico","Laguna Madre","Port Aransas","San Antonio","Slidell","State of Alabama","State of Florida","State of Louisiana","State of Mississippi","State of Texas","Tampa Bay","Ten Thousand Islands","USGS:57aa11efe4b05e859be06932","Weeks Bay","environment","vegetation"],"modified":"2026-09-28T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-97.365203, 25.856967, -81.499719, 30.497478","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"U.S. Gulf of Mexico coast (TX, MS, AL, and FL) Macroclimate Vegetation Data Section 1 (2013-2014)"},"description":"The northern Gulf of Mexico coast spans two major climate gradients and represents an excellent natural laboratory for developing climate-influenced ecological models. In this project, we used these zones of remarkable transition to develop macroclimate-based models for quantifying the regional responses of coastal wetland ecosystems to climate variation. In addition to providing important fish and wildlife habitat and supporting coastal food webs, these coastal wetlands provide many ecosystem goods and services including clean water, stable coastlines, food, recreational opportunities, and stored carbon. Our objective was to examine and forecast the effects of macroclimatic drivers on wetland ecosystem structure and function in the northern Gulf of Mexico.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/7e1f101e-e418-4e76-8f25-80e8590941dd","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/7e1f101e-e418-4e76-8f25-80e8590941dd/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_57aa11efe4b05e859be06932","keyword":["Corpus Christi","Galveston","Grand Bay","Gulf of Mexico","Laguna Madre","Port Aransas","San Antonio","Slidell","State of Alabama","State of Florida","State of Louisiana","State of Mississippi","State of Texas","Tampa Bay","Ten Thousand Islands","USGS:57aa11efe4b05e859be06932","Weeks Bay","environment","vegetation"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-10-01T01:42:07.685326","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":3,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"u-s-gulf-of-mexico-coast-tx-ms-al-and-fl-macroclimate-vegetation-data-section-1-2013-2014","spatial_centroid":{"lat":27.7131714,"lon":-91.01900939999999},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-97.365203,25.856967],[-97.365203,30.497478],[-81.499719,30.497478],[-81.499719,25.856967],[-97.365203,25.856967]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"U.S. Gulf of Mexico coast (TX, MS, AL, and FL) Macroclimate Vegetation Data Section 1 (2013-2014)","type":"dataset"},{"_score":38.023247,"_sort":[1790818056734,38.023247,0,"0cc48ef7-7236-46d3-82db-02e26cd734d9"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Rosemary M Fanelli","hasEmail":"mailto:rfanelli@usgs.gov"},"description":"This data release contains summary metrics describing stream stage, stream water temperature, and short-term climate conditions (daily precipitation and air temperature) for 30 streams spanning gradients of forest and developed land uses and the implementation of agricultural best management practices in the Piedmont region within Maryland, Washington, DC, and Virginia, USA. This setting is the fourth of four settings or \"typologies\" that will be assessed for the USGS Chesapeake Stream Team project. High-frequency stage, water temperature, and air temperature (15-minute data) were measured by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) from March 2024 to September 2024 and are available at McFarland and others (2025; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5066/P13JW8QF). Additional daily air temperature and precipitation data were acquired from the Parameter-elevation Regressions on Independent Slopes Model (PRISM) climate data website. Air temperature and water temperature data were used to compute stream water temperature metrics describing stream temperature conditions in each stream during the monitoring period. Stream stage and precipitation data were used to derive stream stage metrics describing stage conditions (a surrogate for flow) for each stream during the monitoring period. Precipitation and air temperature data from PRISM were also used to compute air temperature metrics and precipitation metrics describing climate conditions during the monitoring period. The metrics include:\nAir temperature metrics \n- Mean daily minimum, mean, and maximum air temperature\nPrecipitation metrics \n- Total precipitation depth\n- Maximum daily precipitation depth\n- Average precipitation depth per days with precipitation\n- Frequency of precipitation days\nStream stage metrics\n- Number of runoff events\n- Frequency of runoff events \n- Standard deviation in unit-value stage\nStream water temperature metrics\n- Coefficient of variation of mean and maximum daily water temperatures\n- Number of days with temperatures of 20 or 25 degrees Celsius or greater\n- Duration of time above 20 or 25 degrees Celsius or greater\n- Maximum of seven-day moving average of daily maximum temperature and daily mean temperature\n- Mean of daily minimum, mean, maximum, and daily water temperature range\n- A thermal sensitivity metric, which is the slope estimate from linear regression model of mean daily water temperature versus mean daily air temperature\nThis data release contains six files:\n1. \"Readme.pdf\": This is an expanded narrative describing the methods by which the input data were compiled and screened, and metrics were computed\n2. \"typology_4_temperature_stage_climate_metric_data_dictionary.csv\": This file contains descriptions of each metric and the time periods for which they were computed in the \u201ctypology_4_temperature_stage_climate_summary_metrics.csv\" file\n3. \"typology_4_temperature_stage_climate_summary_metrics.csv\": This file contains stream temperature metrics, stage metrics, and climate summary metrics for each of the 30 stream sites for different time periods within the overall monitoring period.\n4. \"typology_4_input_data_high_frequency_temperature_and_stage.zip\": This zipped folder contains 30 .csv files, which contain the high-frequency stage, water temperature, and air temperature data collected at each of the 30 stream sites. The file names include the SiteID, which is the four-letter site identification listed in the \"typology_3_temperature_stage_climate_summary_metrics.csv\" file.\n5. \"typology_4_input_data_daily_climate.csv\": This file contains daily climate estimates (precipitation depth, daily minimum, mean, and maximum air temperatures) from PRISM paired to each of the 30 sites.\n6. \"typology_4_runoff_events.csv\": This file contains the stage rise and precipitation data used for some of the stage metric computations.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P14XBLPB","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.6a030eacb66b01f153e0563a.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6a030eacb66b01f153e0563a","keyword":["Chesapeake Bay watershed","Maryland","USGS:6a030eacb66b01f153e0563a","United States","Virginia","Washington, D.C.","biota","farming","freshwater ecosystems","health","hydrology","water temperature"],"modified":"2026-09-28T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-77.6500, 38.2560, -76.6500, 39.4200","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Stream stage, stream temperature, and climate metrics for 30 streams spanning land use and management gradients in the Maryland-Washington, DC-Virginia Developed Piedmont Region, 2024"},"description":"This data release contains summary metrics describing stream stage, stream water temperature, and short-term climate conditions (daily precipitation and air temperature) for 30 streams spanning gradients of forest and developed land uses and the implementation of agricultural best management practices in the Piedmont region within Maryland, Washington, DC, and Virginia, USA. This setting is the fourth of four settings or \"typologies\" that will be assessed for the USGS Chesapeake Stream Team project. High-frequency stage, water temperature, and air temperature (15-minute data) were measured by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) from March 2024 to September 2024 and are available at McFarland and others (2025; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5066/P13JW8QF). Additional daily air temperature and precipitation data were acquired from the Parameter-elevation Regressions on Independent Slopes Model (PRISM) climate data website. Air temperature and water temperature data were used to compute stream water temperature metrics describing stream temperature conditions in each stream during the monitoring period. Stream stage and precipitation data were used to derive stream stage metrics describing stage conditions (a surrogate for flow) for each stream during the monitoring period. Precipitation and air temperature data from PRISM were also used to compute air temperature metrics and precipitation metrics describing climate conditions during the monitoring period. The metrics include:\nAir temperature metrics \n- Mean daily minimum, mean, and maximum air temperature\nPrecipitation metrics \n- Total precipitation depth\n- Maximum daily precipitation depth\n- Average precipitation depth per days with precipitation\n- Frequency of precipitation days\nStream stage metrics\n- Number of runoff events\n- Frequency of runoff events \n- Standard deviation in unit-value stage\nStream water temperature metrics\n- Coefficient of variation of mean and maximum daily water temperatures\n- Number of days with temperatures of 20 or 25 degrees Celsius or greater\n- Duration of time above 20 or 25 degrees Celsius or greater\n- Maximum of seven-day moving average of daily maximum temperature and daily mean temperature\n- Mean of daily minimum, mean, maximum, and daily water temperature range\n- A thermal sensitivity metric, which is the slope estimate from linear regression model of mean daily water temperature versus mean daily air temperature\nThis data release contains six files:\n1. \"Readme.pdf\": This is an expanded narrative describing the methods by which the input data were compiled and screened, and metrics were computed\n2. \"typology_4_temperature_stage_climate_metric_data_dictionary.csv\": This file contains descriptions of each metric and the time periods for which they were computed in the \u201ctypology_4_temperature_stage_climate_summary_metrics.csv\" file\n3. \"typology_4_temperature_stage_climate_summary_metrics.csv\": This file contains stream temperature metrics, stage metrics, and climate summary metrics for each of the 30 stream sites for different time periods within the overall monitoring period.\n4. \"typology_4_input_data_high_frequency_temperature_and_stage.zip\": This zipped folder contains 30 .csv files, which contain the high-frequency stage, water temperature, and air temperature data collected at each of the 30 stream sites. The file names include the SiteID, which is the four-letter site identification listed in the \"typology_3_temperature_stage_climate_summary_metrics.csv\" file.\n5. \"typology_4_input_data_daily_climate.csv\": This file contains daily climate estimates (precipitation depth, daily minimum, mean, and maximum air temperatures) from PRISM paired to each of the 30 sites.\n6. \"typology_4_runoff_events.csv\": This file contains the stage rise and precipitation data used for some of the stage metric computations.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/f70c91ed-3f1b-4253-b972-51d5311f5e5f","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/f70c91ed-3f1b-4253-b972-51d5311f5e5f/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6a030eacb66b01f153e0563a","keyword":["Chesapeake Bay watershed","Maryland","USGS:6a030eacb66b01f153e0563a","United States","Virginia","Washington, D.C.","biota","farming","freshwater ecosystems","health","hydrology","water temperature"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-10-01T01:27:36.734639","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"stream-stage-stream-temperature-and-climate-metrics-for-30-streams-spanning-land-use--2024","spatial_centroid":{"lat":38.7216,"lon":-77.25},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-77.65,38.256],[-77.65,39.42],[-76.65,39.42],[-76.65,38.256],[-77.65,38.256]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Stream stage, stream temperature, and climate metrics for 30 streams spanning land use and management gradients in the Maryland-Washington, DC-Virginia Developed Piedmont Region, 2024","type":"dataset"},{"_score":8.565058,"_sort":[1790803976042,8.565058,1,"34f8f458-4822-4417-9ab2-041fef6ef3b5"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"@type":"dcat:Dataset","accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["005:96"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"USFSEnterpriseContent","hasEmail":"mailto:SM.FS.data@usda.gov"},"description":"Multiple research and management partners collaboratively developed a multiscale approach for assessing the geomorphic sensitivity of streams and ecological resilience of riparian and meadow ecosystems in upland watersheds of the Great Basin to disturbances and management actions. The approach builds on long-term work by the partners on the responses of these systems to disturbances and management actions. At the core of the assessments is information on past and present watershed and stream channel characteristics, geomorphic and hydrologic processes, and riparian and meadow vegetation. In this report, we describe the approach used to delineate Great Basin mountain ranges and the watersheds within them, and the data that are available for the individual watersheds. We also describe the resulting database and the data sources. Furthermore, we summarize information on the characteristics of the regions and watersheds within the regions and the implications of the assessments for geomorphic sensitivity and ecological resilience. The target audience for this multiscale approach is managers and stakeholders interested in assessing and adaptively managing Great Basin stream systems and riparian and meadow ecosystems. Anyone interested in delineating the mountain ranges and watersheds within the Great Basin or quantifying the characteristics of the watersheds will be interested in this report. For more information, visit: https://www.fs.usda.gov/research/treesearch/61573<div><br /></div><div><a href='https://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/edw/datasets.php?xmlKeyword=Great+Basin+Montane' target='_blank' rel='nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer'>Metadata and Downloads</a><br /></div>","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://apps.fs.usda.gov/arcx/rest/services/EDW/EDW_GreatBasinMountainRangesWatersheds_01/MapServer/1","format":"ArcGIS GeoServices REST API","mediaType":"application/json","title":"ArcGIS GeoService"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/0eebaa75bfe342d5a4f7437ddf0691bd/csv?layers=1","format":"CSV","mediaType":"text/csv","title":"CSV"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/0eebaa75bfe342d5a4f7437ddf0691bd/geojson?layers=1","format":"GeoJSON","mediaType":"application/vnd.geo+json","title":"GeoJSON"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/0eebaa75bfe342d5a4f7437ddf0691bd/kml?layers=1","format":"KML","mediaType":"application/vnd.google-earth.kml+xml","title":"KML"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/0eebaa75bfe342d5a4f7437ddf0691bd/shapefile?layers=1","format":"ZIP","mediaType":"application/zip","title":"Shapefile"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/usfs::great-basin-montane-watersheds-pour-points-feature-layer","format":"Web Page","mediaType":"text/html","title":"ArcGIS Hub Dataset"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://www.arcgis.com/sharing/rest/content/items/0eebaa75bfe342d5a4f7437ddf0691bd/info/metadata/metadata.xml?format=iso19139","conformsTo":"https://www.isotc211.org/2005/gmi","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"ISO-19139 metadata"}],"identifier":"https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=0eebaa75bfe342d5a4f7437ddf0691bd&sublayer=1","issued":"2022-11-03","keyword":["Great Basin","Great Basin watershed characteristics","Great Basin watershed database","Open Data","climate","ecosystem resista","fire","geomorphology","geoscientificInformation","inlandWaters","meadows","mountain range delineation","riparian","species","watershed delineation"],"landingPage":"https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/usfs::great-basin-montane-watersheds-pour-points-feature-layer","license":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","modified":"2022-11-21","programCode":["005:059"],"progressCode":"onGoing","publisher":{"name":"U.S. Forest Service","source":"U.S. Forest Service"},"spatial":"-120.4120,37.6856,-111.5769,43.3975","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Great Basin Montane Watersheds - Pour Points (Feature Layer)"},"description":"Multiple research and management partners collaboratively developed a multiscale approach for assessing the geomorphic sensitivity of streams and ecological resilience of riparian and meadow ecosystems in upland watersheds of the Great Basin to disturbances and management actions. The approach builds on long-term work by the partners on the responses of these systems to disturbances and management actions. At the core of the assessments is information on past and present watershed and stream channel characteristics, geomorphic and hydrologic processes, and riparian and meadow vegetation. In this report, we describe the approach used to delineate Great Basin mountain ranges and the watersheds within them, and the data that are available for the individual watersheds. We also describe the resulting database and the data sources. Furthermore, we summarize information on the characteristics of the regions and watersheds within the regions and the implications of the assessments for geomorphic sensitivity and ecological resilience. The target audience for this multiscale approach is managers and stakeholders interested in assessing and adaptively managing Great Basin stream systems and riparian and meadow ecosystems. Anyone interested in delineating the mountain ranges and watersheds within the Great Basin or quantifying the characteristics of the watersheds will be interested in this report. For more information, visit: https://www.fs.usda.gov/research/treesearch/61573<div><br /></div><div><a href='https://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/edw/datasets.php?xmlKeyword=Great+Basin+Montane' target='_blank' rel='nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer'>Metadata and Downloads</a><br /></div>","distribution_titles":["ArcGIS GeoService","CSV","GeoJSON","KML","Shapefile","ArcGIS Hub Dataset","ISO-19139 metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/51ff1905-ab85-427a-84a6-19b773ebe650","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/51ff1905-ab85-427a-84a6-19b773ebe650/raw","has_download":false,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=0eebaa75bfe342d5a4f7437ddf0691bd&sublayer=1","keyword":["Great Basin","Great Basin watershed characteristics","Great Basin watershed database","Open Data","climate","ecosystem resista","fire","geomorphology","geoscientificInformation","inlandWaters","meadows","mountain range delineation","riparian","species","watershed delineation"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-30T21:32:56.042921","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"352b4532-793d-4075-a03f-05b778a3c43a","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/usda.png","name":"Department of Agriculture","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"usda"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":1,"publisher":"U.S. Forest Service","slug":"great-basin-montane-watersheds-pour-points-feature-layer","spatial_centroid":{"lat":39.97036,"lon":-116.87796},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-120.412,37.6856],[-120.412,43.3975],[-111.5769,43.3975],[-111.5769,37.6856],[-120.412,37.6856]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Great Basin Montane Watersheds - Pour Points (Feature Layer)","type":"dataset"},{"_score":10.1579075,"_sort":[1790803955484,10.1579075,0,"b6c5d6d6-15b9-4b5d-9be3-a9b7382ad8fc"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"@type":"dcat:Dataset","accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["005:18","005:20"],"contactPoint":{"fn":"Smart, Brian, C.","hasEmail":"mailto:brian.smart@ndsu.edu"},"description":"<p dir=\"ltr\">Code accompanying the manuscript \"The stability of fatty acid composition in sunflower oil is dependent on environment and affected by structural variation\" (Ingold, Hulke et al.), submitted to Theoretical and Applied Genetics.</p><p dir=\"ltr\">The code implements a genome-wide association study of seed fatty acid composition and its stability in the sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) association mapping (SAM) population of 287 varieties, grown in eight field trials across North America: Vancouver, British Columbia (2010); Moorhead, Minnesota (2015, early and late plantings 2016); Ames, Iowa (2010, 2013, 2014); and Athens, Georgia (2010). Palmitic, stearic, oleic, and linoleic acid were measured by gas chromatography.</p><p dir=\"ltr\">Multivariate GWAS was performed on four phenotype sets: mean fatty acid composition within each environment; the same omitting high oleic varieties; within-environment stability quantified by standard errors among replicate samples (alpha stability); and across-environment stability quantified by Eberhart and Russell's beta.</p><p dir=\"ltr\">Included are scripts for phenotype preparation, beta stability regression, CHELSA climate data extraction and correlation, genotype and kinship analysis (ADMIXTURE, VanRaden kinship, PCA, LD blocks), multivariate GWAS with GEMMA and univariate GWAS with vcf2gwas, post-GWAS candidate gene identification, and analysis of a chromosome 5 introgression associated with stability under hot, humid conditions.</p><p dir=\"ltr\">The code is archived at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22001495 and developed at https://github.com/BrianSmart/SunflowerFattyAcidStabilityGWAS. SNP genotypes are third-party and available from HelianthOME (http://www.helianthome.org/download/#genotype).</p>","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://geodata.nal.usda.gov/geonetwork/srv/api/records/e5eb6950-5358-45a0-b524-41b33ce2b954/formatters/xml","conformsTo":"https://www.isotc211.org/2005/gmd","format":"xml","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Geodata ISO 19139 metadata"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22001495","mediaType":"text/html","title":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22001495"}],"identifier":"10.5281/zenodo.22001495","keyword":["GWAS","Helianthus annus L.","association mapping","fatty acid composition","genotype by environment (G\u00d7E) interaction","linoleic acid","oleic acid","seed oil quality","source code","structural variation","sunflower","trait stability"],"license":"https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","modified":"2026-08-28","programCode":["005:040"],"publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"Agricultural Research Service"},"spatial":"{\"type\": \"MultiPoint\", \"coordinates\": [[-123.1207, 49.2827], [-96.7678, 46.8738], [-93.6199, 42.0347], [-83.3576, 33.9519]]}","temporal":"2010-01-01/2016-12-31","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Code for: The stability of fatty acid composition in sunflower oil is dependent on environment and affected by structural variation"},"description":"<p dir=\"ltr\">Code accompanying the manuscript \"The stability of fatty acid composition in sunflower oil is dependent on environment and affected by structural variation\" (Ingold, Hulke et al.), submitted to Theoretical and Applied Genetics.</p><p dir=\"ltr\">The code implements a genome-wide association study of seed fatty acid composition and its stability in the sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) association mapping (SAM) population of 287 varieties, grown in eight field trials across North America: Vancouver, British Columbia (2010); Moorhead, Minnesota (2015, early and late plantings 2016); Ames, Iowa (2010, 2013, 2014); and Athens, Georgia (2010). Palmitic, stearic, oleic, and linoleic acid were measured by gas chromatography.</p><p dir=\"ltr\">Multivariate GWAS was performed on four phenotype sets: mean fatty acid composition within each environment; the same omitting high oleic varieties; within-environment stability quantified by standard errors among replicate samples (alpha stability); and across-environment stability quantified by Eberhart and Russell's beta.</p><p dir=\"ltr\">Included are scripts for phenotype preparation, beta stability regression, CHELSA climate data extraction and correlation, genotype and kinship analysis (ADMIXTURE, VanRaden kinship, PCA, LD blocks), multivariate GWAS with GEMMA and univariate GWAS with vcf2gwas, post-GWAS candidate gene identification, and analysis of a chromosome 5 introgression associated with stability under hot, humid conditions.</p><p dir=\"ltr\">The code is archived at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22001495 and developed at https://github.com/BrianSmart/SunflowerFattyAcidStabilityGWAS. SNP genotypes are third-party and available from HelianthOME (http://www.helianthome.org/download/#genotype).</p>","distribution_titles":["Geodata ISO 19139 metadata","https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22001495"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/cf2c9546-b9bc-42b3-abdb-ec61759cf271","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/cf2c9546-b9bc-42b3-abdb-ec61759cf271/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"10.5281/zenodo.22001495","keyword":["GWAS","Helianthus annus L.","association mapping","fatty acid composition","genotype by environment (G\u00d7E) interaction","linoleic acid","oleic acid","seed oil quality","source code","structural variation","sunflower","trait stability"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-30T21:32:35.484474","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"352b4532-793d-4075-a03f-05b778a3c43a","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/usda.png","name":"Department of Agriculture","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"usda"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"Agricultural Research Service","slug":"code-for-the-stability-of-fatty-acid-composition-in-sunflower-oil-is-dependent-on-environm","spatial_centroid":{"lat":43.035775,"lon":-99.2165},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[-123.1207,49.2827],[-96.7678,46.8738],[-93.6199,42.0347],[-83.3576,33.9519]],"type":"MultiPoint"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Code for: The stability of fatty acid composition in sunflower oil is dependent on environment and affected by structural variation","type":"dataset"},{"_score":6.1598873,"_sort":[1790803954972,6.1598873,0,"fb56cfff-57ad-4836-a5e6-65a0776b2e24"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"@type":"dcat:Dataset","accessLevel":"public","accrualPeriodicity":"irregular","bureauCode":["005:18"],"contactPoint":{"fn":"Robles, Helix","hasEmail":"mailto:helix.roblez@gmail.com"},"description":"<p dir=\"ltr\">This dataset contains spectral and soil chemistry data, along with accompanying R Markdown and R data files, from a study of whole orchard recycling (WOR) effects on soil organic matter (SOM) in sandy loam soils. The data and code attached here support the manuscript \u201cCharacterization of Particulate and Mineral-Associated Organic Matter in Wood Chip Amended Sandy Loam Soil: Composition and Distribution Across Space-Time\u201d (Robles et al., 2026). </p><p dir=\"ltr\">Soil was collected in July and August 2023 from four experimental almond orchards that received wood chip amendments by whole orchard recycling (WOR) in 2008 (15 years old), 2017 (6 years old), 2019 (4 years old), and 2020 (3 years old); this serves as a space-for-time (SFT) substitution design, with four replicate blocks sampled for each Treatment \u00d7 Field combination. The orchards are located at the University of California Kearney Agricultural Research and Extension Center (36.5966 \u00b0N, -119.5176 \u00b0W) in Parlier, California (USA), each having 4 replicated WOR and control blocks. WOR treatments received 33 \u2013 85 metric tons of wood chips per acre. Chronologically, the 3-year-old orchard received 60 tons of wood per acre, the 4-year-old orchard received 61 tons of wood per acre, the 6-year-old orchard received 85 tons of wood per acre, and the 15-year-old orchard received 33 tons of wood per acre. Control treatments followed conventional management practices during orchard establishment. For the orchards recycled in 2017, 2019, and 2020, the control soils were unamended and burning served as the control treatment in the 2008 orchard. This yields a chronosequence of soil samples at 15-, 6-, 4-, and 3-years post WOR, as a space for time substitution design. The soil texture primarily consists of fine sandy loam, characterized as coarse-loamy, mixed nonacid thermic Typic Xerorthents of the Hanford series. The National Cooperative Soil Survey characterized the Hanford soil series to typically contain less than 1 % soil organic matter (SOM) content, decreasing with depth (Official Series Description - HANFORD Series, n.d.). The orchard experiences a Mediterranean climate, with dry, hot summers and cool, wet winters and precipitation levels generally falling below almond evapotranspiration requirements for a significant portion of the growing season. On average, the annual rainfall and temperature stand at 285 mm and 17\u00b0C, respectively. Thus, all crop production in the region is irrigated.</p><p dir=\"ltr\">Particulate organic matter (POM) and mineral-associated organic matter (MAOM) fractions were isolated from <2 mm soil and analyzed by diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS). Raw spectra (including bleached NaOCl-oxidized POM and MAOM samples) are stored in SFT_POM_MAOM_raw.rds and processed in Raw_spectra.rmd. Mineral contributions were removed by spectral subtraction (POM \u2013 PX and MAM \u2013 MX), and spectra were transformed using Kubelka\u2013Munk (KM) functions in OMNIC; the resulting spectral subtraction data are stored in SFT_POM_MAOM_sub_KM.rds and SFT_POM_MAOM_sub_KM_ave.rds (replicate spectra are averaged) and processed in Subtracted_Spectra.rmd and Averaged_Spectra.rmd. Soil chemistry and index data (<2 mm soil, POM, MAOM) are in SFT_2023_Metadata.rds and Helix_Index123.rds and analyzed in SFT_Chem.rmd and SFT_stats.rmd. Variables include total carbon (TC), total nitrogen (TN), C:N ratios, SOM, water-holding capacity (WHC), pH, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), dissolved organic nitrogen (DON), microbial biomass carbon (MBC), microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN), and CO2 respiration. These files allow reproduction of DRIFTS spectral analyses (raw, subtraction, and averaged spectra) and statistical analyses of soil chemistry and index values. The READ_ME file describes the main purpose of each data file/analysis, and defines acronyms used.</p>","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://geodata.nal.usda.gov/geonetwork/srv/api/records/81174c3b-9de9-4e8b-bb60-93c1867810b5/formatters/xml","format":"xml","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Geodata ISO 19139 metadata"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/67292615","format":"txt","mediaType":"text/plain","title":"READ_ME.txt"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/67292618","format":"Rmd","mediaType":"text/plain","title":"SFT_Chem.Rmd"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/67292621","format":"Rmd","mediaType":"text/plain","title":"SFT_Stats.Rmd"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/67292624","format":"Rmd","mediaType":"text/plain","title":"Subtracted_Spectra.Rmd"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/67292627","format":"Rmd","mediaType":"text/plain","title":"Averaged_Spectra.Rmd"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/67292630","format":"Rmd","mediaType":"text/plain","title":"Raw_Spectra.Rmd"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/67292633","format":"csv","mediaType":"text/csv","title":"Helix_Index123_filt.csv"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/67292636","format":"csv","mediaType":"text/csv","title":"WOR_SFT_2023_POM_MAOM_TC_TN_Subtraction.csv"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/67292639","format":"csv","mediaType":"text/csv","title":"SFT_2023_Metadata.csv"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/67292642","format":"rds","mediaType":"application/gzip","title":"Helix_Index123.rds"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/67292645","format":"rds","mediaType":"application/gzip","title":"SFT_2023_Metadata.rds"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/67292648","format":"rds","mediaType":"application/gzip","title":"POM_MAOM_TC_TN_Subtraction.rds"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/67292651","format":"rds","mediaType":"application/gzip","title":"SFT_POM_MAOM_sub_KM.rds"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/67292654","format":"rds","mediaType":"application/gzip","title":"SFT_POM_MAOM_raw.rds"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/67292657","format":"rds","mediaType":"application/gzip","title":"SFT_POM_MAOM_sub_KM_ave.rds"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/67318229","format":"xlsx","mediaType":"application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet","title":"WOR_SFT_means_treatment_field.xlsx"}],"identifier":"10.15482/USDA.ADC/33135455.v1","keyword":["DRIFTS Diffuse reflectance","Mid -infrared (MIR) spectroscopy","Particulate organic matter\u00a0(POM)","Soil","Soil organic carbon pools","Whole orchard recycling","mineral associated organic matter","source code"],"license":"https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","modified":"2026-08-21","programCode":["005:040"],"publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"Agricultural Research Service"},"spatial":"{\"type\": \"Polygon\", \"coordinates\": [[[-119.52085947479276, 36.59204409985334], [-119.50248159287305, 36.59204409985334], [-119.50248159287305, 36.600049975939484], [-119.52085947479276, 36.600049975939484], [-119.52085947479276, 36.59204409985334]]]}","temporal":"2023-07-24/2023-08-23","title":"DRIFT Spectra of POM and MAOM in sandy loam soils amended by whole orchard recycling (WOR)"},"description":"<p dir=\"ltr\">This dataset contains spectral and soil chemistry data, along with accompanying R Markdown and R data files, from a study of whole orchard recycling (WOR) effects on soil organic matter (SOM) in sandy loam soils. The data and code attached here support the manuscript \u201cCharacterization of Particulate and Mineral-Associated Organic Matter in Wood Chip Amended Sandy Loam Soil: Composition and Distribution Across Space-Time\u201d (Robles et al., 2026). </p><p dir=\"ltr\">Soil was collected in July and August 2023 from four experimental almond orchards that received wood chip amendments by whole orchard recycling (WOR) in 2008 (15 years old), 2017 (6 years old), 2019 (4 years old), and 2020 (3 years old); this serves as a space-for-time (SFT) substitution design, with four replicate blocks sampled for each Treatment \u00d7 Field combination. The orchards are located at the University of California Kearney Agricultural Research and Extension Center (36.5966 \u00b0N, -119.5176 \u00b0W) in Parlier, California (USA), each having 4 replicated WOR and control blocks. WOR treatments received 33 \u2013 85 metric tons of wood chips per acre. Chronologically, the 3-year-old orchard received 60 tons of wood per acre, the 4-year-old orchard received 61 tons of wood per acre, the 6-year-old orchard received 85 tons of wood per acre, and the 15-year-old orchard received 33 tons of wood per acre. Control treatments followed conventional management practices during orchard establishment. For the orchards recycled in 2017, 2019, and 2020, the control soils were unamended and burning served as the control treatment in the 2008 orchard. This yields a chronosequence of soil samples at 15-, 6-, 4-, and 3-years post WOR, as a space for time substitution design. The soil texture primarily consists of fine sandy loam, characterized as coarse-loamy, mixed nonacid thermic Typic Xerorthents of the Hanford series. The National Cooperative Soil Survey characterized the Hanford soil series to typically contain less than 1 % soil organic matter (SOM) content, decreasing with depth (Official Series Description - HANFORD Series, n.d.). The orchard experiences a Mediterranean climate, with dry, hot summers and cool, wet winters and precipitation levels generally falling below almond evapotranspiration requirements for a significant portion of the growing season. On average, the annual rainfall and temperature stand at 285 mm and 17\u00b0C, respectively. Thus, all crop production in the region is irrigated.</p><p dir=\"ltr\">Particulate organic matter (POM) and mineral-associated organic matter (MAOM) fractions were isolated from <2 mm soil and analyzed by diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS). Raw spectra (including bleached NaOCl-oxidized POM and MAOM samples) are stored in SFT_POM_MAOM_raw.rds and processed in Raw_spectra.rmd. Mineral contributions were removed by spectral subtraction (POM \u2013 PX and MAM \u2013 MX), and spectra were transformed using Kubelka\u2013Munk (KM) functions in OMNIC; the resulting spectral subtraction data are stored in SFT_POM_MAOM_sub_KM.rds and SFT_POM_MAOM_sub_KM_ave.rds (replicate spectra are averaged) and processed in Subtracted_Spectra.rmd and Averaged_Spectra.rmd. Soil chemistry and index data (<2 mm soil, POM, MAOM) are in SFT_2023_Metadata.rds and Helix_Index123.rds and analyzed in SFT_Chem.rmd and SFT_stats.rmd. Variables include total carbon (TC), total nitrogen (TN), C:N ratios, SOM, water-holding capacity (WHC), pH, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), dissolved organic nitrogen (DON), microbial biomass carbon (MBC), microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN), and CO2 respiration. These files allow reproduction of DRIFTS spectral analyses (raw, subtraction, and averaged spectra) and statistical analyses of soil chemistry and index values. The READ_ME file describes the main purpose of each data file/analysis, and defines acronyms used.</p>","distribution_titles":["Geodata ISO 19139 metadata","READ_ME.txt","SFT_Chem.Rmd","SFT_Stats.Rmd","Subtracted_Spectra.Rmd","Averaged_Spectra.Rmd","Raw_Spectra.Rmd","Helix_Index123_filt.csv","WOR_SFT_2023_POM_MAOM_TC_TN_Subtraction.csv","SFT_2023_Metadata.csv","Helix_Index123.rds","SFT_2023_Metadata.rds","POM_MAOM_TC_TN_Subtraction.rds","SFT_POM_MAOM_sub_KM.rds","SFT_POM_MAOM_raw.rds","SFT_POM_MAOM_sub_KM_ave.rds","WOR_SFT_means_treatment_field.xlsx"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/fdecdf16-3999-47ba-bcf0-86e9e257439e","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/fdecdf16-3999-47ba-bcf0-86e9e257439e/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"10.15482/USDA.ADC/33135455.v1","keyword":["DRIFTS Diffuse reflectance","Mid -infrared (MIR) spectroscopy","Particulate organic matter\u00a0(POM)","Soil","Soil organic carbon pools","Whole orchard recycling","mineral associated organic matter","source code"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-30T21:32:34.972637","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"352b4532-793d-4075-a03f-05b778a3c43a","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/usda.png","name":"Department of Agriculture","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"usda"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"Agricultural Research Service","slug":"drift-spectra-of-pom-and-maom-in-sandy-loam-soils-amended-by-whole-orchard-recycling-wor","spatial_centroid":{"lat":36.5952464502878,"lon":-119.51350832202488},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-119.52085947479276,36.59204409985334],[-119.50248159287305,36.59204409985334],[-119.50248159287305,36.600049975939484],[-119.52085947479276,36.600049975939484],[-119.52085947479276,36.59204409985334]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":[],"title":"DRIFT Spectra of POM and MAOM in sandy loam soils amended by whole orchard recycling (WOR)","type":"dataset"},{"_score":9.342201,"_sort":[1790803952041,9.342201,1,"8735f6d5-ca99-4844-bff2-b4d1f3804945"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"@type":"dcat:Dataset","accessLevel":"public","accrualPeriodicity":"R/P1D","bureauCode":["005:18"],"contactPoint":{"fn":"Baffaut, Claire","hasEmail":"mailto:claire.baffaut@usda.gov"},"description":"<p dir=\"ltr\">This dataset includes the monthly and daily data used for the analysis of historical and future trends in precipitation and temperature at five Long-Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) sites: Kellogg Biological Station (KBS) in Michigan, Upper Mississippi River Basin (UMRB) in Iowa, Central Mississippi River Basin (CMRB) in Missouri, Southern Plains (SP) in Oklahoma, and Lower Mississippi River Basin (LMRB) in Mississippi. Historical data include the longest available record of daily precipitation, minimum temperature, and maximum temperature at weather stations from KBS, UMRB, CMRB, and LMRB, and the monthly 1895-2020 data from the National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration for the climate divisions that represent the five LTAR sites. Future data include 2020-2100 monthly predictions for the five sites from 26 Earth System Models and two Shared Socio-economic Pathways (SSP): the middle of the road SSP245 (a continuation of current emission rates and geo-political conditions), and the fossil fueled development scenario SSP 585 (intensification of fossil fuel energy sources and corresponding emissions). In addition, the data includes the trends calculated from historical and future data, snippets of R code used to calculate these trends, and README files that detail the content of each file.</p><p dir=\"ltr\">Trends in records of 50 years or more showed that temperatures have changed from 1900-2020, more for minimum (0.1 - 0.3 \u2103 decade<sup>-1</sup>) than maximum (-0.1 - 0.2 \u2103<sup> </sup>decade<sup>-1</sup>), more for winter (-0.1 - 0.3 \u2103<sup> </sup>decade<sup>-1</sup>) than summer (-0.1 - 0.1 \u2103 decade<sup>-1</sup>), and more often in the north than in the south. Except in Mississippi, annual precipitation has increased at rates of 25 mm decade<sup>-1</sup> or greater over 1950-2020, but monthly trends were inconsistent. Projected trends suggest continued temperature increases, highlighting the need for research on management systems that are resilient to such increases.</p>","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://geodata.nal.usda.gov/geonetwork/srv/api/records/260ae977-85ee-4b78-88be-0d5b1f86a74c/formatters/xml","conformsTo":"https://www.isotc211.org/2005/gmd","format":"xml","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Geodata ISO 19139 metadata"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/56608406","format":"txt","mediaType":"text/plain","title":"README.txt"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/56608409","format":"txt","mediaType":"text/plain","title":"README_LOCA2.txt"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/56608412","format":"xlsx","mediaType":"application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet","title":"Station Data.xlsx"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/56608418","format":"xlsx","mediaType":"application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet","title":"NOAA Data and trends.xlsx"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/56608421","format":"zip","mediaType":"application/zip","title":"LOCA2-LTAR.zip"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/56608451","format":"xlsx","mediaType":"application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet","title":"ESM_Data_trends_AllTrends.xlsx"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/56608478","format":"txt","mediaType":"text/plain","title":"Climate_Indicators.txt"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/56608481","format":"txt","mediaType":"text/plain","title":"Coeff_Var_Trender.txt"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/56608484","format":"txt","mediaType":"text/plain","title":"LOCA_MKTrend.txt"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/56608487","format":"txt","mediaType":"text/plain","title":"ViolinPlotter.txt"}],"identifier":"10.15482/USDA.ADC/29640977.v1","keyword":["CMIP 6 dataset","LTAR","Trend Analysis Background Data","precipitation","source code","temperature"],"license":"https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","modified":"2026-08-25","programCode":["005:040"],"publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"Agricultural Research Service"},"spatial":"{\"type\": \"MultiPoint\", \"coordinates\": [[-85.4, 42.4], [-93.8, 42.3], [-92.1, 39.2], [-90.5, 33.45]]}","temporal":"1895-01-01/2100-01-01","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Data from: Are historical trends in weather consistent with model predictions in the Central United States?"},"description":"<p dir=\"ltr\">This dataset includes the monthly and daily data used for the analysis of historical and future trends in precipitation and temperature at five Long-Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) sites: Kellogg Biological Station (KBS) in Michigan, Upper Mississippi River Basin (UMRB) in Iowa, Central Mississippi River Basin (CMRB) in Missouri, Southern Plains (SP) in Oklahoma, and Lower Mississippi River Basin (LMRB) in Mississippi. Historical data include the longest available record of daily precipitation, minimum temperature, and maximum temperature at weather stations from KBS, UMRB, CMRB, and LMRB, and the monthly 1895-2020 data from the National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration for the climate divisions that represent the five LTAR sites. Future data include 2020-2100 monthly predictions for the five sites from 26 Earth System Models and two Shared Socio-economic Pathways (SSP): the middle of the road SSP245 (a continuation of current emission rates and geo-political conditions), and the fossil fueled development scenario SSP 585 (intensification of fossil fuel energy sources and corresponding emissions). In addition, the data includes the trends calculated from historical and future data, snippets of R code used to calculate these trends, and README files that detail the content of each file.</p><p dir=\"ltr\">Trends in records of 50 years or more showed that temperatures have changed from 1900-2020, more for minimum (0.1 - 0.3 \u2103 decade<sup>-1</sup>) than maximum (-0.1 - 0.2 \u2103<sup> </sup>decade<sup>-1</sup>), more for winter (-0.1 - 0.3 \u2103<sup> </sup>decade<sup>-1</sup>) than summer (-0.1 - 0.1 \u2103 decade<sup>-1</sup>), and more often in the north than in the south. Except in Mississippi, annual precipitation has increased at rates of 25 mm decade<sup>-1</sup> or greater over 1950-2020, but monthly trends were inconsistent. Projected trends suggest continued temperature increases, highlighting the need for research on management systems that are resilient to such increases.</p>","distribution_titles":["Geodata ISO 19139 metadata","README.txt","README_LOCA2.txt","Station Data.xlsx","NOAA Data and trends.xlsx","LOCA2-LTAR.zip","ESM_Data_trends_AllTrends.xlsx","Climate_Indicators.txt","Coeff_Var_Trender.txt","LOCA_MKTrend.txt","ViolinPlotter.txt"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/73e60f2d-3810-4a41-960d-d3b6150db7c7","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/73e60f2d-3810-4a41-960d-d3b6150db7c7/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"10.15482/USDA.ADC/29640977.v1","keyword":["CMIP 6 dataset","LTAR","Trend Analysis Background Data","precipitation","source code","temperature"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-30T21:32:32.041052","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"352b4532-793d-4075-a03f-05b778a3c43a","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/usda.png","name":"Department of Agriculture","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"usda"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":1,"publisher":"Agricultural Research Service","slug":"data-from-are-historical-trends-in-weather-consistent-with-model-predictions-in-the-centra","spatial_centroid":{"lat":39.3375,"lon":-90.45},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[-85.4,42.4],[-93.8,42.3],[-92.1,39.2],[-90.5,33.45]],"type":"MultiPoint"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Data from: Are historical trends in weather consistent with model predictions in the Central United States?","type":"dataset"},{"_score":8.319088,"_sort":[1790803895703,8.319088,4,"1a85cb8e-bfcd-4ee3-b40f-ea15e087a213"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"@type":"dcat:Dataset","accessLevel":"public","accrualPeriodicity":"irregular","bureauCode":["005:18"],"contactPoint":{"fn":"Liebig, Mark A.","hasEmail":"mailto:mark.liebig@usda.gov"},"description":"<p dir=\"ltr\">Retaining crop residue on the soil surface is important in semiarid cropping systems, where dry conditions and variable weather can render the soil susceptible to degradation and moisture loss. Conversely, removing crop residue can generate an additional income stream for agricultural producers, while broadening the spectrum of uses from harvestable commodities. Understanding potential tradeoffs of crop residue removal across a range of agroecosystems over the long-term is essential to adequately guide management decisions. A study was conducted to quantify crop and soil responses to continuous spring wheat treatments with and without straw removal, each managed under minimum and no-tillage. Treatments were replicated three times and deployed over a 24-yr period. Soil coverage by crop residue was measured annually using two 25 point transects spaced equally along a 7.6 m cable. Spring wheat aboveground biomass was measured prior to combine harvest using 0.33 m2 frames. Biomass samples were threshed to separate grain from straw. Soil samples were collected in 2018 with a hydraulic probe to a 152.4 cm depth in increments of 0-7.6, 7.6-15.2, 15.2-30.5, 30.5-61.0, 61.0-91.4, 91.4-121.9, and 121.9-152.4 cm. Separate samples for aggregate stability analysis were collected with a trowel from the 0-7.6 cm depth. Soil samples were evaluated for soil bulk density, water-stable aggregates (WSA), electrical conductivity, soil pH, nitrate-nitrogen, available phosphorus, sulfate-sulfur, exchangeable cations (Ca, Mg, K, Na), micronutrients (B, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn), total soil nitrogen, total carbon, inorganic carbon, and particulate organic matter (POM) carbon and nitrogen. Particulate organic matter (POM) was estimated from material retained on a 0.053 mm sieve analyzed for carbon and nitrogen content by dry combustion. Analyses for POM and WSA were conducted for the 0-7.6 cm depth only. Data may be used to better understand crop and soil property responses to residue management and tillage practices under rainfed conditions within a semiarid continental climate. Applicable USDA soil types include Temvik, Wilton, Grassna, Linton, Mandan, and Williams.</p><p dir=\"ltr\">The SQM Data Dictionary describes element/value names, data type, etc. for each spreadsheet tab, and the Metadata files describe attributes and units for their respective data files.</p><p><br></p><p dir=\"ltr\"><br></p>","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/66673745","format":"xlsx","mediaType":"application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet","title":"SQM_Data Dictionary.xlsx"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/66673748","format":"xlsx","mediaType":"application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet","title":"SQM_AllDepthsSoil_2018.xlsx"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/66673751","format":"xlsx","mediaType":"application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet","title":"SQM_Crop_Aboveground Biomass.xlsx"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/66673754","format":"xlsx","mediaType":"application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet","title":"SQM_Soil Cover.xlsx"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/66673757","format":"xlsx","mediaType":"application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet","title":"SQM_WSA&POM.xlsx"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/66673760","format":"csv","mediaType":"text/csv","title":"SQM_AllDepthsSoil_2018_Data.csv"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/66673763","format":"csv","mediaType":"text/csv","title":"SQM_AllDepthsSoil_2018_Metadata.csv"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/66673766","format":"csv","mediaType":"text/csv","title":"SQM_Crop_Aboveground Biomass_Data.csv"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/66673769","format":"csv","mediaType":"text/csv","title":"SQM_Crop_Aboveground Biomass_Metadata.csv"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/66673772","format":"csv","mediaType":"text/csv","title":"SQM_Soil Cover_Data.csv"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/66673775","format":"csv","mediaType":"text/csv","title":"SQM_Soil Cover_Metadata.csv"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/66673778","format":"csv","mediaType":"text/csv","title":"SQM_WSA&POM_Data.csv"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/66673781","format":"csv","mediaType":"text/csv","title":"SQM_WSA&POM_Metadata.csv"}],"identifier":"10.15482/USDA.ADC/32911835.v1","keyword":["No-tillage","Residue management","Semiarid cropping systems","Soil cover","Spring wheat"],"license":"https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","modified":"2026-08-11","programCode":["005:040"],"publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"Agricultural Research Service"},"spatial":"{\"type\": \"Point\", \"coordinates\": [-100.95, 46.77099999999999]}","temporal":"1994-04-01/2018-04-01","title":"Data from: Crop and Soil Responses to 24 years of Wheat Residue Removal and Tillage"},"description":"<p dir=\"ltr\">Retaining crop residue on the soil surface is important in semiarid cropping systems, where dry conditions and variable weather can render the soil susceptible to degradation and moisture loss. Conversely, removing crop residue can generate an additional income stream for agricultural producers, while broadening the spectrum of uses from harvestable commodities. Understanding potential tradeoffs of crop residue removal across a range of agroecosystems over the long-term is essential to adequately guide management decisions. A study was conducted to quantify crop and soil responses to continuous spring wheat treatments with and without straw removal, each managed under minimum and no-tillage. Treatments were replicated three times and deployed over a 24-yr period. Soil coverage by crop residue was measured annually using two 25 point transects spaced equally along a 7.6 m cable. Spring wheat aboveground biomass was measured prior to combine harvest using 0.33 m2 frames. Biomass samples were threshed to separate grain from straw. Soil samples were collected in 2018 with a hydraulic probe to a 152.4 cm depth in increments of 0-7.6, 7.6-15.2, 15.2-30.5, 30.5-61.0, 61.0-91.4, 91.4-121.9, and 121.9-152.4 cm. Separate samples for aggregate stability analysis were collected with a trowel from the 0-7.6 cm depth. Soil samples were evaluated for soil bulk density, water-stable aggregates (WSA), electrical conductivity, soil pH, nitrate-nitrogen, available phosphorus, sulfate-sulfur, exchangeable cations (Ca, Mg, K, Na), micronutrients (B, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn), total soil nitrogen, total carbon, inorganic carbon, and particulate organic matter (POM) carbon and nitrogen. Particulate organic matter (POM) was estimated from material retained on a 0.053 mm sieve analyzed for carbon and nitrogen content by dry combustion. Analyses for POM and WSA were conducted for the 0-7.6 cm depth only. Data may be used to better understand crop and soil property responses to residue management and tillage practices under rainfed conditions within a semiarid continental climate. Applicable USDA soil types include Temvik, Wilton, Grassna, Linton, Mandan, and Williams.</p><p dir=\"ltr\">The SQM Data Dictionary describes element/value names, data type, etc. for each spreadsheet tab, and the Metadata files describe attributes and units for their respective data files.</p><p><br></p><p dir=\"ltr\"><br></p>","distribution_titles":["SQM_Data Dictionary.xlsx","SQM_AllDepthsSoil_2018.xlsx","SQM_Crop_Aboveground Biomass.xlsx","SQM_Soil Cover.xlsx","SQM_WSA&POM.xlsx","SQM_AllDepthsSoil_2018_Data.csv","SQM_AllDepthsSoil_2018_Metadata.csv","SQM_Crop_Aboveground Biomass_Data.csv","SQM_Crop_Aboveground Biomass_Metadata.csv","SQM_Soil Cover_Data.csv","SQM_Soil Cover_Metadata.csv","SQM_WSA&POM_Data.csv","SQM_WSA&POM_Metadata.csv"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/84fcca8f-454c-4458-8141-4a9f51de279c","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/84fcca8f-454c-4458-8141-4a9f51de279c/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"10.15482/USDA.ADC/32911835.v1","keyword":["No-tillage","Residue management","Semiarid cropping systems","Soil cover","Spring wheat"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-30T21:31:35.703428","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"352b4532-793d-4075-a03f-05b778a3c43a","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/usda.png","name":"Department of Agriculture","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"usda"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":4,"publisher":"Agricultural Research Service","slug":"data-from-crop-and-soil-responses-to-24-years-of-wheat-residue-removal-and-tillage","spatial_centroid":{"lat":46.77099999999999,"lon":-100.95},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[-100.95,46.77099999999999],"type":"Point"},"theme":[],"title":"Data from: Crop and Soil Responses to 24 years of Wheat Residue Removal and Tillage","type":"dataset"},{"_score":4.562584,"_sort":[1790803845020,4.562584,3,"64eb3d36-297a-42e0-8ada-993f0f668373"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"@type":"dcat:Dataset","accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["005:18"],"contactPoint":{"fn":"Roeder, Karl, A.","hasEmail":"mailto:karl.roeder@usda.gov"},"description":"<p dir=\"ltr\">Three .csv files. Two years of data collected on critical thermal maxima and minima (CTmax and CTmin) from 14 colonies in Oklahoma from 2017-2018. Additional data files represent thermal traits from 10 colonies in a short term (10 days) acclimation experiment and projections using environmental data for potential activity differences.</p><p dir=\"ltr\"><b><u>Abstract from paper:</u></b></p><p dir=\"ltr\">How do individuals tolerate both the hot and the cold climate of our planet? One possibility is that organisms have plastic traits like thermal tolerance that allow them to function in highly variable environments. In this study, we tested whether phenotypic plasticity of temperature tolerance (i.e. acclimatization in the field and acclimation in the lab) occurs in the red harvester ant, <i>Pogonomyrmex barbatus</i>, at two temporal scales. We first measured the upper and lower critical thermal limits (CT<sub>max</sub> and CT<sub>min</sub>) of ants monthly for two years while concurrently measuring environmental conditions. Both CT<sub>max</sub> and CT<sub>min</sub> co-varied with temperature in a predictable way; values increased in a positive, linear manner. We then experimentally tested whether CT<sub>max</sub> and CT<sub>min</sub> could shift within a shorter time period by exposing subcolonies of ants to cool (10\u00b0C), moderate (20\u00b0C), and hot (30\u00b0C) temperatures for 10 days. CT<sub>max</sub> increased only slightly at the hottest temperature treatment (+1.2\u00b0C), however CT<sub>min</sub> increased considerably under both moderate (+2.6\u00b0C) and hot treatments (+3.8\u00b0C). Combined, our results suggest that thermal tolerance of ants may be more plastic than originally hypothesized, potentially aiding an already thermophilic clade.</p><p dir=\"ltr\"><b><u>Methods from paper:</u></b></p><p dir=\"ltr\"><i>Study site and environmental temperature</i></p><p dir=\"ltr\">We sampled ant workers monthly during their annual active period in 2017 and 2018 (i.e. March-November) from 14 colonies in a 30-ha grazed prairie in the central Great Plains of Oklahoma (34.5478\u00ba N, -98.2311\u00ba W, 330 m elevation). Over two years, ground temperature was recorded every 10 minutes using HOBO U23 Pro v2 External Temperature Data loggers at three equidistant locations within the sampling area. Temperature values were then averaged per month.</p><p><br></p><p dir=\"ltr\"><i>Thermal tolerance across months</i></p><p dir=\"ltr\">During each sampling event (n = 18), we collected ~20 workers directly outside the nest of each colony and used 5 workers to measure critical thermal maximum (CT<sub>max</sub>) and 5 workers to measure critical thermal minimum (CT<sub>min</sub>). We did so using a heating/cooling assay to determine the temperature at which individuals lost muscle control. Thermal assays were conducted by placing individual ants into 1.5ml microcentrifuge tubes and plugging the tops with cotton to remove a potential thermal refuge in the cap. For CT<sub>max</sub>, tubes were placed randomly into a Thermal-Lok 2-position dry heat bath that was prewarmed to 36\u00baC. Every 10 minutes, individuals were checked to see if they had reached their critical thermal limit by rotating the tube to check for a righting response. The temperature was then increased by 2\u00baC, with the process repeated until all individuals had reached their critical thermal maximum. CT<sub>min</sub> was assayed in a similar manner, but we used a EchoThermTM IC20 chilling/heating dry bath that was precooled to 20\u00baC, following the methods above except with temperature lowered 2\u00b0C every 10 minutes. Additional ants from each colony were kept at ambient conditions as a control during each thermal assay, all of which survived. During each trial, we also confirmed the interior temperature of one unused vial using a thermocouple attached to an Extech MN35 Digital Mini MultiMeter. CT<sub>max</sub> and CT<sub>min</sub> values were averaged per colony for each month.</p><p><br></p><p dir=\"ltr\"><i>Thermal tolerance within a month</i></p><p dir=\"ltr\">In April of 2019, we collected ~200 workers from each of 10 separate colonies to assess if critical thermal limits could change within a single cohort of ants over a short period of time. We split each group of 200 workers into three sub-colonies containing 50 workers and placed these newly created sub-colonies into three environmental chambers set at 10\u00baC, 20\u00baC, and 30\u00baC with a 12:12 L:D cycle and 85% RH. The selected temperatures span the approximate range of average monthly temperatures at our study site during which ants were active. Each sub-colony was provided with water and 20% sucrose solution ad libitum in cotton plugged vials and a small petri dish with Plaster of Paris that was moistened every other day. Critical thermal limits (CT<sub>max</sub> and CT<sub>min</sub>) were assayed using five individuals from each colony immediately prior to the start of the experiment and for five individuals from each sub-colony after 10 days in the environmental chambers. CT<sub>max</sub> and CT<sub>min</sub> values were averaged per colony for each temperature treatment.</p>","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/52668251","format":"csv","mediaType":"text/csv","title":"File 2 Across Months Pogo Thermal.csv"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/52668254","format":"csv","mediaType":"text/csv","title":"File 3 Within Month Pogo Thermal.csv"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/52668257","format":"csv","mediaType":"text/csv","title":"File 1 METADATA Pogo Thermal.csv"}],"identifier":"10.15482/USDA.ADC/28459058.v1","keyword":["Critical thermal limits","Pogonomyrmex barbatus","temperature","traits"],"license":"https://www.usa.gov/publicdomain/label/1.0/","modified":"2026-08-25","programCode":["005:040"],"publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"Agricultural Research Service"},"temporal":"2017-03-01/2018-11-30","title":"Data from: Temporal plasticity of thermal tolerance in ants"},"description":"<p dir=\"ltr\">Three .csv files. Two years of data collected on critical thermal maxima and minima (CTmax and CTmin) from 14 colonies in Oklahoma from 2017-2018. Additional data files represent thermal traits from 10 colonies in a short term (10 days) acclimation experiment and projections using environmental data for potential activity differences.</p><p dir=\"ltr\"><b><u>Abstract from paper:</u></b></p><p dir=\"ltr\">How do individuals tolerate both the hot and the cold climate of our planet? One possibility is that organisms have plastic traits like thermal tolerance that allow them to function in highly variable environments. In this study, we tested whether phenotypic plasticity of temperature tolerance (i.e. acclimatization in the field and acclimation in the lab) occurs in the red harvester ant, <i>Pogonomyrmex barbatus</i>, at two temporal scales. We first measured the upper and lower critical thermal limits (CT<sub>max</sub> and CT<sub>min</sub>) of ants monthly for two years while concurrently measuring environmental conditions. Both CT<sub>max</sub> and CT<sub>min</sub> co-varied with temperature in a predictable way; values increased in a positive, linear manner. We then experimentally tested whether CT<sub>max</sub> and CT<sub>min</sub> could shift within a shorter time period by exposing subcolonies of ants to cool (10\u00b0C), moderate (20\u00b0C), and hot (30\u00b0C) temperatures for 10 days. CT<sub>max</sub> increased only slightly at the hottest temperature treatment (+1.2\u00b0C), however CT<sub>min</sub> increased considerably under both moderate (+2.6\u00b0C) and hot treatments (+3.8\u00b0C). Combined, our results suggest that thermal tolerance of ants may be more plastic than originally hypothesized, potentially aiding an already thermophilic clade.</p><p dir=\"ltr\"><b><u>Methods from paper:</u></b></p><p dir=\"ltr\"><i>Study site and environmental temperature</i></p><p dir=\"ltr\">We sampled ant workers monthly during their annual active period in 2017 and 2018 (i.e. March-November) from 14 colonies in a 30-ha grazed prairie in the central Great Plains of Oklahoma (34.5478\u00ba N, -98.2311\u00ba W, 330 m elevation). Over two years, ground temperature was recorded every 10 minutes using HOBO U23 Pro v2 External Temperature Data loggers at three equidistant locations within the sampling area. Temperature values were then averaged per month.</p><p><br></p><p dir=\"ltr\"><i>Thermal tolerance across months</i></p><p dir=\"ltr\">During each sampling event (n = 18), we collected ~20 workers directly outside the nest of each colony and used 5 workers to measure critical thermal maximum (CT<sub>max</sub>) and 5 workers to measure critical thermal minimum (CT<sub>min</sub>). We did so using a heating/cooling assay to determine the temperature at which individuals lost muscle control. Thermal assays were conducted by placing individual ants into 1.5ml microcentrifuge tubes and plugging the tops with cotton to remove a potential thermal refuge in the cap. For CT<sub>max</sub>, tubes were placed randomly into a Thermal-Lok 2-position dry heat bath that was prewarmed to 36\u00baC. Every 10 minutes, individuals were checked to see if they had reached their critical thermal limit by rotating the tube to check for a righting response. The temperature was then increased by 2\u00baC, with the process repeated until all individuals had reached their critical thermal maximum. CT<sub>min</sub> was assayed in a similar manner, but we used a EchoThermTM IC20 chilling/heating dry bath that was precooled to 20\u00baC, following the methods above except with temperature lowered 2\u00b0C every 10 minutes. Additional ants from each colony were kept at ambient conditions as a control during each thermal assay, all of which survived. During each trial, we also confirmed the interior temperature of one unused vial using a thermocouple attached to an Extech MN35 Digital Mini MultiMeter. CT<sub>max</sub> and CT<sub>min</sub> values were averaged per colony for each month.</p><p><br></p><p dir=\"ltr\"><i>Thermal tolerance within a month</i></p><p dir=\"ltr\">In April of 2019, we collected ~200 workers from each of 10 separate colonies to assess if critical thermal limits could change within a single cohort of ants over a short period of time. We split each group of 200 workers into three sub-colonies containing 50 workers and placed these newly created sub-colonies into three environmental chambers set at 10\u00baC, 20\u00baC, and 30\u00baC with a 12:12 L:D cycle and 85% RH. The selected temperatures span the approximate range of average monthly temperatures at our study site during which ants were active. Each sub-colony was provided with water and 20% sucrose solution ad libitum in cotton plugged vials and a small petri dish with Plaster of Paris that was moistened every other day. Critical thermal limits (CT<sub>max</sub> and CT<sub>min</sub>) were assayed using five individuals from each colony immediately prior to the start of the experiment and for five individuals from each sub-colony after 10 days in the environmental chambers. CT<sub>max</sub> and CT<sub>min</sub> values were averaged per colony for each temperature treatment.</p>","distribution_titles":["File 2 Across Months Pogo Thermal.csv","File 3 Within Month Pogo Thermal.csv","File 1 METADATA Pogo Thermal.csv"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/baca902d-dd40-4535-bead-faa5a68dce8f","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/baca902d-dd40-4535-bead-faa5a68dce8f/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":false,"identifier":"10.15482/USDA.ADC/28459058.v1","keyword":["Critical thermal limits","Pogonomyrmex barbatus","temperature","traits"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-30T21:30:45.020435","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"352b4532-793d-4075-a03f-05b778a3c43a","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/usda.png","name":"Department of Agriculture","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"usda"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":3,"publisher":"Agricultural Research Service","slug":"data-from-temporal-plasticity-of-thermal-tolerance-in-ants","spatial_centroid":null,"spatial_shape":null,"theme":[],"title":"Data from: Temporal plasticity of thermal tolerance in ants","type":"dataset"},{"_score":15.252194,"_sort":[1790803842515,15.252194,1,"a592d3cf-ad2e-4a98-a2bf-e2f7fdd71671"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"@type":"dcat:Dataset","accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["005:18"],"contactPoint":{"fn":"Bandaru, Varaprasad","hasEmail":"mailto:prasad.bandaru@usda.gov"},"description":"<p dir=\"ltr\">The Environmental Policy Integrated Climate (EPIC) model is a comprehensive, field-scale agroecosystem model widely used for both diagnostic and prognostic analyses in agriculture. However, its application at regional scales is limited due to its original design to simulate a limited number of fields. Custom Python or R scripts have attempted to scale EPIC, but they are often inefficient, non-standardized, and not publicly available. To address these issues,  a comprehensive Python package, named as GeoEPIC, that streamlines spatial EPIC implementation. GeoEPIC automates input generation from spatial datasets, model calibration, simulation execution, and output post-processing.</p>","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://smarsgroup.github.io/geo_epic_win/reference/api/core/","mediaType":"text/html","title":"https://smarsgroup.github.io/geo_epic_win/reference/api/core/"}],"identifier":"10779/USDA.ADC.31151371.v1","keyword":["EPIC crop model","Python","Spatial Modeling Approach"],"license":"https://opensource.org/license/BSD-3-Clause","modified":"2026-08-25","programCode":["005:040"],"publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"Agricultural Research Service"},"temporal":"2024-06-01/2025-11-30","title":"GeoEPIC Python Package"},"description":"<p dir=\"ltr\">The Environmental Policy Integrated Climate (EPIC) model is a comprehensive, field-scale agroecosystem model widely used for both diagnostic and prognostic analyses in agriculture. However, its application at regional scales is limited due to its original design to simulate a limited number of fields. Custom Python or R scripts have attempted to scale EPIC, but they are often inefficient, non-standardized, and not publicly available. To address these issues,  a comprehensive Python package, named as GeoEPIC, that streamlines spatial EPIC implementation. GeoEPIC automates input generation from spatial datasets, model calibration, simulation execution, and output post-processing.</p>","distribution_titles":["https://smarsgroup.github.io/geo_epic_win/reference/api/core/"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/8efe138f-32f1-43cf-ad94-fc669543fae2","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/8efe138f-32f1-43cf-ad94-fc669543fae2/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":false,"identifier":"10779/USDA.ADC.31151371.v1","keyword":["EPIC crop model","Python","Spatial Modeling Approach"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-30T21:30:42.515787","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"352b4532-793d-4075-a03f-05b778a3c43a","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/usda.png","name":"Department of Agriculture","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"usda"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":1,"publisher":"Agricultural Research Service","slug":"geoepic-python-package","spatial_centroid":null,"spatial_shape":null,"theme":[],"title":"GeoEPIC Python Package","type":"dataset"},{"_score":8.30905,"_sort":[1790794424534,8.30905,4,"374f22e6-71ff-41c8-ad59-226d7c041e6e"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"@type":"dcat:Dataset","accessLevel":"public","contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"OpenData","hasEmail":"mailto:no-reply@data.sf.gov"},"description":"<strong>A. SUMMARY</strong>\nThe Municipal Natural Gas Equipment Inventory serves to catalog natural gas-fueled equipment used in municipally owned buildings. \nThis inventory, implemented by the SF Environment Department, aims to establish an understanding of the scope of work needed to electrify municipal buildings and inform an effective and collaborative planning process.\nThis effort was identified as an action in Section BO-2.4 of the  <u><a href=\"https://www.sfenvironment.org/files/events/2021_climate_action_plan.pdf\">2021 Climate Action Plan</a></u> and is included in the <u><a href=\"https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/san_francisco/latest/sf_environment/0-0-0-577\">Environment Code Chapter 7</a></u> (Municipal Green Building Requirements). \n\n<strong>B. HOW THE DATASET IS CREATED</strong>\nThe list of buildings required to report data for the Municipal Natural Gas Equipment Inventory was compiled by cross-referencing the City\u2019s  <u><a href=\"https://data.sfgov.org/City-Infrastructure/City-Facilities/nc68-ngbr/about_datax\">Facility Systems of Record</a></u> and the  <u><a href=\"https://sfpuc.org/about-us/reports/municipal-buildings-energy-benchmarking\">2020 municipal benchmarking report</a></u> to identify all city-owned buildings with non-zero carbon emissions. Numerous municipal buildings are exempt from these reporting requirements, including facilities of the Port of San Francisco and buildings with a primary purpose of providing collection, storage, treatment, delivery, distribution, and/or transmission of water, wastewater, and/or power utilities. \nEach department received an inventory template, provided by the Environment Department, to submit high level building data and detailed information on each piece of natural gas equipment in use in these buildings. Departments were asked to self-report the required building and equipment data over the course of a 6-month data collection period in 2023 and are asked to keep this inventory up to date in the following years as equipment is replaced. \n\n<strong>C. UPDATE PROCESS</strong>\nThe inventory will be regularly updated by department representatives via the inventory PowerApp. When a gas-powered equipment item is retired or replaced, departments are asked to mark it as no longer in use and provide information on any electric replacement equipment, if applicable. While departments have the flexibility to update the inventory at any time, they are encouraged to do so at 6 month intervals at the minimum. \n\nUpdated inventory data will be automatically reflected in this dataset. \n\n<strong>D. HOW TO USE THIS DATASET</strong>\nIt is important to note that this dataset does not include facilities of the Port of San Francisco and buildings with a primary purpose of providing collection, storage, treatment, delivery, distribution, and/or transmission of water, wastewater, and/or power utilities, in accordance with Environment Code Chapter 7 exemptions.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","describedBy":"https://data.sf.gov/api/views/vc6r-v7av/columns.json","describedByType":"application/json","downloadURL":"https://data.sf.gov/api/v3/views/vc6r-v7av/query.json?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"application/json"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","describedBy":"https://data.sf.gov/api/views/vc6r-v7av/columns.xml","describedByType":"application/xml","downloadURL":"https://data.sf.gov/api/v3/views/vc6r-v7av/query.xml?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"application/xml"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://data.sf.gov/api/v3/views/vc6r-v7av/export.csv?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"text/csv"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://data.sf.gov/api/v3/views/vc6r-v7av/export.kml?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"application/vnd.google-earth.kml+xml"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://data.sf.gov/api/v3/views/vc6r-v7av/export.kmz?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"application/vnd.google-earth.kmz"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://data.sf.gov/api/v3/views/vc6r-v7av/query.geojson?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"application/geo+json"}],"identifier":"https://data.sf.gov/api/views/vc6r-v7av","issued":"2024-03-28","keyword":["environment","environmental health","greenhouse gas emissions","natural gas"],"landingPage":"https://data.sf.gov/d/vc6r-v7av","modified":"2026-09-25","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"data.sf.gov"},"theme":["Energy and Environment"],"title":"San Francisco Municipal Natural Gas Equipment Inventory"},"description":"<strong>A. SUMMARY</strong>\nThe Municipal Natural Gas Equipment Inventory serves to catalog natural gas-fueled equipment used in municipally owned buildings. \nThis inventory, implemented by the SF Environment Department, aims to establish an understanding of the scope of work needed to electrify municipal buildings and inform an effective and collaborative planning process.\nThis effort was identified as an action in Section BO-2.4 of the  <u><a href=\"https://www.sfenvironment.org/files/events/2021_climate_action_plan.pdf\">2021 Climate Action Plan</a></u> and is included in the <u><a href=\"https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/san_francisco/latest/sf_environment/0-0-0-577\">Environment Code Chapter 7</a></u> (Municipal Green Building Requirements). \n\n<strong>B. HOW THE DATASET IS CREATED</strong>\nThe list of buildings required to report data for the Municipal Natural Gas Equipment Inventory was compiled by cross-referencing the City\u2019s  <u><a href=\"https://data.sfgov.org/City-Infrastructure/City-Facilities/nc68-ngbr/about_datax\">Facility Systems of Record</a></u> and the  <u><a href=\"https://sfpuc.org/about-us/reports/municipal-buildings-energy-benchmarking\">2020 municipal benchmarking report</a></u> to identify all city-owned buildings with non-zero carbon emissions. Numerous municipal buildings are exempt from these reporting requirements, including facilities of the Port of San Francisco and buildings with a primary purpose of providing collection, storage, treatment, delivery, distribution, and/or transmission of water, wastewater, and/or power utilities. \nEach department received an inventory template, provided by the Environment Department, to submit high level building data and detailed information on each piece of natural gas equipment in use in these buildings. Departments were asked to self-report the required building and equipment data over the course of a 6-month data collection period in 2023 and are asked to keep this inventory up to date in the following years as equipment is replaced. \n\n<strong>C. UPDATE PROCESS</strong>\nThe inventory will be regularly updated by department representatives via the inventory PowerApp. When a gas-powered equipment item is retired or replaced, departments are asked to mark it as no longer in use and provide information on any electric replacement equipment, if applicable. While departments have the flexibility to update the inventory at any time, they are encouraged to do so at 6 month intervals at the minimum. \n\nUpdated inventory data will be automatically reflected in this dataset. \n\n<strong>D. HOW TO USE THIS DATASET</strong>\nIt is important to note that this dataset does not include facilities of the Port of San Francisco and buildings with a primary purpose of providing collection, storage, treatment, delivery, distribution, and/or transmission of water, wastewater, and/or power utilities, in accordance with Environment Code Chapter 7 exemptions.","distribution_titles":[],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/a9410d11-9680-48b4-b202-c60f9b86a428","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/a9410d11-9680-48b4-b202-c60f9b86a428/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":false,"identifier":"https://data.sf.gov/api/views/vc6r-v7av","keyword":["environment","environmental health","greenhouse gas emissions","natural gas"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-30T18:53:44.534447","organization":{"aliases":["sf","california"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"7f3c6c7a-ef5f-4ee0-87ce-a0300ba767d5","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/city_san_francisco_ca.png","name":"City of San Francisco","organization_type":"City Government","slug":"san-francisco-ca"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":4,"publisher":"data.sf.gov","slug":"san-francisco-municipal-natural-gas-equipment-inventory","spatial_centroid":null,"spatial_shape":null,"theme":["Energy and Environment"],"title":"San Francisco Municipal Natural Gas Equipment Inventory","type":"dataset"},{"_score":11.83732,"_sort":[1790794365880,11.83732,3,"a10e5023-e04a-489e-bb3e-1a02043b2958"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"@type":"dcat:Dataset","accessLevel":"public","contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"NY Open Data","hasEmail":"mailto:no-reply@data.ny.gov"},"description":"Energy storage is critical to New York\u2019s clean energy future. As renewable power sources like wind and solar provide a larger portion of New York\u2019s electricity, storage will allow clean energy to be available when and where it is most needed.  The 2019 Climate Act set a statewide goal of 3,000 MW of Energy Storage by 2030, further increased to 6,000 MW of Energy Storage by 2030 by Governor Kathy Hochul.  \n\nThis dataset tracks progress towards these statewide goals by compiling data on installed energy storage projects. Projects that received funding support from NYSERDA, as well as unincentivized projects, are included in this dataset\n\nThe New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) offers objective information and analysis, innovative programs, technical expertise, and support to help develop energy storage projects. Please see https://www.nyserda.ny.gov/All-Programs/Energy-Storage-Program.\n\nThe New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) offers objective information and analysis, innovative programs, technical expertise, and support to help New Yorkers increase energy efficiency, save money, use renewable energy, and reduce reliance on fossil fuels. To learn more about NYSERDA\u2019s programs, visit https://nyserda.ny.gov or follow us on X, Facebook, YouTube, or Instagram.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","describedBy":"https://data.ny.gov/api/views/hspb-4n4p/columns.json","describedByType":"application/json","downloadURL":"https://data.ny.gov/api/v3/views/hspb-4n4p/query.json?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"application/json"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","describedBy":"https://data.ny.gov/api/views/hspb-4n4p/columns.xml","describedByType":"application/xml","downloadURL":"https://data.ny.gov/api/v3/views/hspb-4n4p/query.xml?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"application/xml"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://data.ny.gov/api/v3/views/hspb-4n4p/export.csv?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"text/csv"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://data.ny.gov/api/v3/views/hspb-4n4p/export.kml?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"application/vnd.google-earth.kml+xml"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://data.ny.gov/api/v3/views/hspb-4n4p/export.kmz?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"application/vnd.google-earth.kmz"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://data.ny.gov/api/v3/views/hspb-4n4p/query.geojson?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"application/geo+json"}],"identifier":"https://data.ny.gov/api/views/hspb-4n4p","issued":"2023-04-05","keyword":["energy storage","environment","mw","mwh","renewable"],"landingPage":"https://data.ny.gov/d/hspb-4n4p","modified":"2026-09-29","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"data.ny.gov"},"theme":["Energy & Environment"],"title":"All Statewide Energy Storage Projects"},"description":"Energy storage is critical to New York\u2019s clean energy future. As renewable power sources like wind and solar provide a larger portion of New York\u2019s electricity, storage will allow clean energy to be available when and where it is most needed.  The 2019 Climate Act set a statewide goal of 3,000 MW of Energy Storage by 2030, further increased to 6,000 MW of Energy Storage by 2030 by Governor Kathy Hochul.  \n\nThis dataset tracks progress towards these statewide goals by compiling data on installed energy storage projects. Projects that received funding support from NYSERDA, as well as unincentivized projects, are included in this dataset\n\nThe New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) offers objective information and analysis, innovative programs, technical expertise, and support to help develop energy storage projects. Please see https://www.nyserda.ny.gov/All-Programs/Energy-Storage-Program.\n\nThe New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) offers objective information and analysis, innovative programs, technical expertise, and support to help New Yorkers increase energy efficiency, save money, use renewable energy, and reduce reliance on fossil fuels. To learn more about NYSERDA\u2019s programs, visit https://nyserda.ny.gov or follow us on X, Facebook, YouTube, or Instagram.","distribution_titles":[],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/fc9e01f6-645e-4997-932a-18fc05a3f134","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/fc9e01f6-645e-4997-932a-18fc05a3f134/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":false,"identifier":"https://data.ny.gov/api/views/hspb-4n4p","keyword":["energy storage","environment","mw","mwh","renewable"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-30T18:52:45.880419","organization":{"aliases":["ny"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"dde3fc99-e074-41cf-a843-14aa9c777889","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/state_NY.png","name":"State of New York","organization_type":"State Government","slug":"new-york"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":3,"publisher":"data.ny.gov","slug":"all-statewide-energy-storage-projects","spatial_centroid":null,"spatial_shape":null,"theme":["Energy & Environment"],"title":"All Statewide Energy Storage Projects","type":"dataset"},{"_score":34.159634,"_sort":[1790794311147,34.159634,2,"60e490e3-4e75-48f6-ae19-3af1c9f26565"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"@type":"dcat:Dataset","accessLevel":"public","contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"NY Open Data","hasEmail":"mailto:no-reply@data.ny.gov"},"description":"The Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA) directs the Climate Justice Working Group (CJWG) to establish criteria for defining disadvantaged communities. This dataset identifies areas throughout the State that meet the final disadvantaged community definition as voted on by the Climate Justice Working Group. \n\nThe New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) offers objective information and analysis, innovative programs, technical expertise, and support to help New Yorkers increase energy efficiency, save money, use renewable energy, accelerate economic growth, and reduce reliance on fossil fuels. To learn more about NYSERDA\u2019s programs, visit nyserda.ny.gov or follow us on X, Facebook, YouTube, or Instagram.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","describedBy":"https://data.ny.gov/api/views/2e6c-s6fp/columns.json","describedByType":"application/json","downloadURL":"https://data.ny.gov/api/v3/views/2e6c-s6fp/query.json?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"application/json"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","describedBy":"https://data.ny.gov/api/views/2e6c-s6fp/columns.xml","describedByType":"application/xml","downloadURL":"https://data.ny.gov/api/v3/views/2e6c-s6fp/query.xml?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"application/xml"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://data.ny.gov/api/v3/views/2e6c-s6fp/export.csv?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"text/csv"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://data.ny.gov/api/v3/views/2e6c-s6fp/export.kml?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"application/vnd.google-earth.kml+xml"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://data.ny.gov/api/v3/views/2e6c-s6fp/export.kmz?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"application/vnd.google-earth.kmz"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://data.ny.gov/api/v3/views/2e6c-s6fp/query.geojson?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"application/geo+json"}],"identifier":"https://data.ny.gov/api/views/2e6c-s6fp","issued":"2023-10-11","keyword":["cjwg","clcpa","climate act","climate justice working group","climate leadership and community protection act","dac","disadvantaged communities","ej","environmental justice","low to moderate income"],"landingPage":"https://data.ny.gov/d/2e6c-s6fp","modified":"2026-09-29","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"data.ny.gov"},"theme":["Energy & Environment"],"title":"Final Disadvantaged Communities (DAC) 2023"},"description":"The Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA) directs the Climate Justice Working Group (CJWG) to establish criteria for defining disadvantaged communities. This dataset identifies areas throughout the State that meet the final disadvantaged community definition as voted on by the Climate Justice Working Group. \n\nThe New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) offers objective information and analysis, innovative programs, technical expertise, and support to help New Yorkers increase energy efficiency, save money, use renewable energy, accelerate economic growth, and reduce reliance on fossil fuels. To learn more about NYSERDA\u2019s programs, visit nyserda.ny.gov or follow us on X, Facebook, YouTube, or Instagram.","distribution_titles":[],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/1a630521-c0dd-4c2b-94ab-68704c61e9cb","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/1a630521-c0dd-4c2b-94ab-68704c61e9cb/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":false,"identifier":"https://data.ny.gov/api/views/2e6c-s6fp","keyword":["cjwg","clcpa","climate act","climate justice working group","climate leadership and community protection act","dac","disadvantaged communities","ej","environmental justice","low to moderate income"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-30T18:51:51.147922","organization":{"aliases":["ny"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"dde3fc99-e074-41cf-a843-14aa9c777889","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/state_NY.png","name":"State of New York","organization_type":"State Government","slug":"new-york"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":2,"publisher":"data.ny.gov","slug":"final-disadvantaged-communities-dac-2023","spatial_centroid":null,"spatial_shape":null,"theme":["Energy & Environment"],"title":"Final Disadvantaged Communities (DAC) 2023","type":"dataset"},{"_score":42.373447,"_sort":[1790724150193,42.373447,0,"eb5841ea-bfc2-4a06-9919-27f20a791664"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"@type":"dcat:Dataset","accessLevel":"public","contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"NYC OpenData","hasEmail":"mailto:no-reply@data.cityofnewyork.us"},"description":"The Resiliency Exposure Forecast for Tree Canopy projects canopy coverage in acres across NYC neighborhoods at decadal intervals (2021, 2030, 2040, 2050, 2055). Projections are based on expected tree canopy growth maintained across jurisdictions - requiring efforts by private and public landowners - and expanded through the NYC Parks Department's Neighborhood Tree Planting Program. Coverage estimates are derived from Land Cover raster data from the city's Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) assessments. The 2021 value serves as the baseline year, corresponding to the most recent LiDAR survey update. For more information on methods and modeling, see OMB's Technical Appendix for the FY 2027 Climate Budgeting Publication: https://www.nyc.gov/assets/omb/downloads/pdf/exec26/exec26-nyccbta.pdf","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","describedBy":"https://data.cityofnewyork.us/api/views/mzcd-fznk/columns.json","describedByType":"application/json","downloadURL":"https://data.cityofnewyork.us/api/v3/views/mzcd-fznk/query.json?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"application/json"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","describedBy":"https://data.cityofnewyork.us/api/views/mzcd-fznk/columns.xml","describedByType":"application/xml","downloadURL":"https://data.cityofnewyork.us/api/v3/views/mzcd-fznk/query.xml?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"application/xml"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://data.cityofnewyork.us/api/v3/views/mzcd-fznk/export.csv?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"text/csv"}],"identifier":"https://data.cityofnewyork.us/api/views/mzcd-fznk","issued":"2026-07-09","keyword":["untagged"],"landingPage":"https://data.cityofnewyork.us/d/mzcd-fznk","modified":"2026-09-29","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"data.cityofnewyork.us"},"title":"NYC Climate Budgeting Report: Resiliency Exposure Forecast - Outdoor Heat - Tree Canopy"},"description":"The Resiliency Exposure Forecast for Tree Canopy projects canopy coverage in acres across NYC neighborhoods at decadal intervals (2021, 2030, 2040, 2050, 2055). Projections are based on expected tree canopy growth maintained across jurisdictions - requiring efforts by private and public landowners - and expanded through the NYC Parks Department's Neighborhood Tree Planting Program. Coverage estimates are derived from Land Cover raster data from the city's Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) assessments. The 2021 value serves as the baseline year, corresponding to the most recent LiDAR survey update. For more information on methods and modeling, see OMB's Technical Appendix for the FY 2027 Climate Budgeting Publication: https://www.nyc.gov/assets/omb/downloads/pdf/exec26/exec26-nyccbta.pdf","distribution_titles":[],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/15458cd4-8fcb-4ed1-8cab-1ff1f6844322","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/15458cd4-8fcb-4ed1-8cab-1ff1f6844322/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":false,"identifier":"https://data.cityofnewyork.us/api/views/mzcd-fznk","keyword":["untagged"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-29T23:22:30.193563","organization":{"aliases":[""],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"1149ee63-2fff-494e-82e5-9aace9d3b3bf","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/city_new_york_ny.png","name":"City of New York","organization_type":"City Government","slug":"nyc-ny"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"data.cityofnewyork.us","slug":"nyc-climate-budgeting-report-resiliency-exposure-forecast-outdoor-heat-tree-canopy","spatial_centroid":null,"spatial_shape":null,"theme":[],"title":"NYC Climate Budgeting Report: Resiliency Exposure Forecast - Outdoor Heat - Tree Canopy","type":"dataset"},{"_score":1.3977528,"_sort":[1790722114415,1.3977528,6,"aa3ec6b7-e87c-4b2d-bd9e-a8ba8bce61de"],"access_level":"non-public","dcat":{"@type":"dcat:Dataset","accessLevel":"non-public","contactPoint":{"fn":"Not provided - Contact data.gov","hasEmail":"mailto:datagovsupport@gsa.gov"},"describedBy":"https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/publications/CO-OPS_Measurement_Spec.pdf","describedByType":"application/octet-stream","description":"The National Ocean Service (NOS) maintains a long-term database containing data from active and historic stations installed all over the United States and U.S. territories.  Since the 1990s, NOAA's Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services (CO-OPS) has been collecting various meteorological data along the U.S. coastline, around the Great Lakes and connecting channels, as well as in various U.S. territories.  Stations are configured for a variety of observation periods, depending upon the location.  Some of these sensors are located with water level stations, while others are independent, dedicated meteorological stations.  These data are used to support a variety of purposes including but not limited to safe and efficient marine navigation and coastal hazards monitoring.  The standard reporting time for collecting data are in 6-minute intervals.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/stations.html?type=Meteorological+Observations","describedByType":"application/octet-stream","description":"Downloadable Data","mediaType":"text/html","title":"CO-OPS web services and GIS access"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/web_services_info.html","describedByType":"application/octet-stream","description":"This page directs users to our web services and GIS Portal. Users can access our Data API, our Data API builder tool, ERDDAP, THREDDS Server and other web services.","mediaType":"text/html","title":"CO-OPS web services"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/","describedByType":"application/octet-stream","description":"Access to our data via the website and web services.","mediaType":"text/html","title":"CO-OPS home page"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/map/","describedByType":"application/octet-stream","description":"This is our interactive map. Zoom in/out and pan around as desired. Stations\nare identified by color-coded push-pins. Click on a push-pin to access information\nand data from that station.","mediaType":"text/html","title":"Tides and Currents Map"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://forum.earthdata.nasa.gov/app.php/tag/GCMD%2BKeywords","describedByType":"application/octet-stream","description":"Global Change Master Directory (GCMD). 2026. GCMD Keywords, Version 24. Greenbelt, MD: Earth Science Data and Information System, Earth Science Projects Division, Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). URL (GCMD Keyword Forum Page): https://forum.earthdata.nasa.gov/app.php/tag/GCMD+Keywords","mediaType":"text/html","title":"GCMD Keyword Forum Page"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/67953","describedByType":"application/octet-stream","description":"View the complete metadata record on InPort for more information about this dataset.","mediaType":"text/html","title":"Full Metadata Record"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","describedByType":"application/octet-stream","description":"Entity Attribute Detail URL","downloadURL":"https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/publications/CO-OPS_Measurement_Spec.pdf","format":"PDF","mediaType":"application/pdf","title":"Entity Attribute Detail URL"}],"identifier":"https://data.noaa.gov/waf/NOAA/nos/coops/iso/xml/67953.xml","issued":"2022-01-01T00:00:00.000+00:00","keyword":["EARTH SCIENCE > ATMOSPHERE > AIR QUALITY > VISIBILITY","EARTH SCIENCE > ATMOSPHERE > ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE > ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS","EARTH SCIENCE > ATMOSPHERE > ATMOSPHERIC TEMPERATURE > SURFACE TEMPERATURE > AIR TEMPERATURE","EARTH SCIENCE > ATMOSPHERE > ATMOSPHERIC WINDS > SURFACE WINDS","EARTH SCIENCE > ATMOSPHERE > PRECIPITATION > LIQUID PRECIPITATION > RAIN","EARTH SCIENCE > BIOSPHERE > ECOLOGICAL DYNAMICS > ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONS","EARTH SCIENCE > CLIMATE INDICATORS > ATMOSPHERIC/OCEAN INDICATORS > PRECIPITATION INDICATORS > SAHEL STANDARDIZED RAINFALL","EARTH SCIENCE > OCEANS > COASTAL PROCESSES > STORM SURGE","EARTH SCIENCE > OCEANS > OCEAN TEMPERATURE > WATER TEMPERATURE","EARTH SCIENCE > OCEANS > OCEAN WINDS > SURFACE WINDS","EARTH SCIENCE > OCEANS > TIDES > STORM SURGE","EARTH SCIENCE > SPECTRAL/ENGINEERING > RADAR > DOPPLER VELOCITY","EARTH SCIENCE > TERRESTRIAL HYDROSPHERE > SURFACE WATER > SURFACE WATER PROCESSES/MEASUREMENTS > INUNDATION","EARTH SCIENCE SERVICES > DATA ANALYSIS AND VISUALIZATION > GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS > WEB-BASED GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS","EARTH SCIENCE SERVICES > ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORIES > MARINE ADVISORIES > MARINE WEATHER/FORECAST","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > ALABAMA","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > ALASKA","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > CALIFORNIA","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > CONNECTICUT","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > DELAWARE","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > FLORIDA","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > GEORGIA","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > GREAT LAKES","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > HAWAII","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > ILLINOIS","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > LOUISIANA","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > MAINE","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > MARYLAND","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > MASSACHUSETTS","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > MICHIGAN","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > MINNESOTA","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > MISSISSIPPI","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > NEW JERSEY","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > NEW YORK","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > NORTH CAROLINA","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > OHIO","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > OREGON","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > PENNSYLVANIA","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > RHODE ISLAND","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > SOUTH CAROLINA","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > TEXAS","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > VIRGINIA","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > WASHINGTON","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > WISCONSIN","OCEAN > ATLANTIC OCEAN > NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN > BERMUDA","OCEAN > ATLANTIC OCEAN > NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN > CARIBBEAN SEA","OCEAN > ATLANTIC OCEAN > NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN > CARIBBEAN SEA > PUERTO RICO","OCEAN > ATLANTIC OCEAN > NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN > CARIBBEAN SEA > VIRGIN ISLANDS","OCEAN > ATLANTIC OCEAN > NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN > GULF OF AMERICA","OCEAN > PACIFIC OCEAN > CENTRAL PACIFIC OCEAN > AMERICAN SAMOA","OCEAN > PACIFIC OCEAN > CENTRAL PACIFIC OCEAN > HAWAIIAN ISLANDS","OCEAN > PACIFIC OCEAN > CENTRAL PACIFIC OCEAN > MIDWAY ATOLL","OCEAN > PACIFIC OCEAN > CENTRAL PACIFIC OCEAN > WAKE ISLAND","OCEAN > PACIFIC OCEAN > NORTH PACIFIC OCEAN > GULF OF ALASKA","OCEAN > PACIFIC OCEAN > SOUTH PACIFIC OCEAN > POLYNESIA > SAMOA","OCEAN > PACIFIC OCEAN > WESTERN PACIFIC OCEAN > MICRONESIA > GUAM","OCEAN > PACIFIC OCEAN > WESTERN PACIFIC OCEAN > MICRONESIA > MARSHALL ISLANDS","ANEMOMETERS > ANEMOMETERS","APS > Air Pressure Sensor","BAROMETERS > BAROMETERS","HUMIDITY SENSORS > HUMIDITY SENSORS","PRESSURE SENSORS > PRESSURE SENSORS","RAIN GAUGES > RAIN GAUGES","TEMPERATURE PROBES > TEMPERATURE PROBES","TEMPERATURE SENSORS > TEMPERATURE SENSORS","THERMISTORS > THERMISTORS","Visibility Sensor > Visibility Sensor","GOES > NOAA Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites","Models > Coastal Ocean Models","NOCMP > National Operational Coastal Modeling Program","NWLON > National Water Level Observation Network","OFS > Operational Forecast Systems","PORTS > Physical Oceanographic Real-Time System","Coastal U.S. territories","Coastal United States","Gulf of Mexico","U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone","DOC/NOAA/NOS/CO-OPS > Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services, National Ocean Service, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce","CO-OPS Metadata Library"],"landingPage":"https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/67953","language":[],"license":"https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","modified":"2022-01-01T00:00:00.000+00:00","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services"},"rights":"otherRestrictions, unclassified","spatial":"-61.8,-14.3,144.6,71.4","temporal":"1990-01-01T00:00:00+00:00/1990-01-01T00:00:00+00:00","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Meteorological Data (including visibility)"},"description":"The National Ocean Service (NOS) maintains a long-term database containing data from active and historic stations installed all over the United States and U.S. territories.  Since the 1990s, NOAA's Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services (CO-OPS) has been collecting various meteorological data along the U.S. coastline, around the Great Lakes and connecting channels, as well as in various U.S. territories.  Stations are configured for a variety of observation periods, depending upon the location.  Some of these sensors are located with water level stations, while others are independent, dedicated meteorological stations.  These data are used to support a variety of purposes including but not limited to safe and efficient marine navigation and coastal hazards monitoring.  The standard reporting time for collecting data are in 6-minute intervals.","distribution_titles":["CO-OPS web services and GIS access","CO-OPS web services","CO-OPS home page","Tides and Currents Map","GCMD Keyword Forum Page","Full Metadata Record","Entity Attribute Detail URL"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/c7df7228-1e2a-4f13-a374-75499ec42b58","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/c7df7228-1e2a-4f13-a374-75499ec42b58/raw","harvest_record_transformed":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/c7df7228-1e2a-4f13-a374-75499ec42b58/transformed","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"https://data.noaa.gov/waf/NOAA/nos/coops/iso/xml/67953.xml","keyword":["EARTH SCIENCE > ATMOSPHERE > AIR QUALITY > VISIBILITY","EARTH SCIENCE > ATMOSPHERE > ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE > ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS","EARTH SCIENCE > ATMOSPHERE > ATMOSPHERIC TEMPERATURE > SURFACE TEMPERATURE > AIR TEMPERATURE","EARTH SCIENCE > ATMOSPHERE > ATMOSPHERIC WINDS > SURFACE WINDS","EARTH SCIENCE > ATMOSPHERE > PRECIPITATION > LIQUID PRECIPITATION > RAIN","EARTH SCIENCE > BIOSPHERE > ECOLOGICAL DYNAMICS > ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONS","EARTH SCIENCE > CLIMATE INDICATORS > ATMOSPHERIC/OCEAN INDICATORS > PRECIPITATION INDICATORS > SAHEL STANDARDIZED RAINFALL","EARTH SCIENCE > OCEANS > COASTAL PROCESSES > STORM SURGE","EARTH SCIENCE > OCEANS > OCEAN TEMPERATURE > WATER TEMPERATURE","EARTH SCIENCE > OCEANS > OCEAN WINDS > SURFACE WINDS","EARTH SCIENCE > OCEANS > TIDES > STORM SURGE","EARTH SCIENCE > SPECTRAL/ENGINEERING > RADAR > DOPPLER VELOCITY","EARTH SCIENCE > TERRESTRIAL HYDROSPHERE > SURFACE WATER > SURFACE WATER PROCESSES/MEASUREMENTS > INUNDATION","EARTH SCIENCE SERVICES > DATA ANALYSIS AND VISUALIZATION > GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS > WEB-BASED GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS","EARTH SCIENCE SERVICES > ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORIES > MARINE ADVISORIES > MARINE WEATHER/FORECAST","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > ALABAMA","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > ALASKA","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > CALIFORNIA","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > CONNECTICUT","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > DELAWARE","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > FLORIDA","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > GEORGIA","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > GREAT LAKES","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > HAWAII","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > ILLINOIS","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > LOUISIANA","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > MAINE","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > MARYLAND","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > MASSACHUSETTS","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > MICHIGAN","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > MINNESOTA","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > MISSISSIPPI","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > NEW JERSEY","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > NEW YORK","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > NORTH CAROLINA","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > OHIO","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > OREGON","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > PENNSYLVANIA","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > RHODE ISLAND","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > SOUTH CAROLINA","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > TEXAS","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > VIRGINIA","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > WASHINGTON","CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > WISCONSIN","OCEAN > ATLANTIC OCEAN > NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN > BERMUDA","OCEAN > ATLANTIC OCEAN > NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN > CARIBBEAN SEA","OCEAN > ATLANTIC OCEAN > NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN > CARIBBEAN SEA > PUERTO RICO","OCEAN > ATLANTIC OCEAN > NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN > CARIBBEAN SEA > VIRGIN ISLANDS","OCEAN > ATLANTIC OCEAN > NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN > GULF OF AMERICA","OCEAN > PACIFIC OCEAN > CENTRAL PACIFIC OCEAN > AMERICAN SAMOA","OCEAN > PACIFIC OCEAN > CENTRAL PACIFIC OCEAN > HAWAIIAN ISLANDS","OCEAN > PACIFIC OCEAN > CENTRAL PACIFIC OCEAN > MIDWAY ATOLL","OCEAN > PACIFIC OCEAN > CENTRAL PACIFIC OCEAN > WAKE ISLAND","OCEAN > PACIFIC OCEAN > NORTH PACIFIC OCEAN > GULF OF ALASKA","OCEAN > PACIFIC OCEAN > SOUTH PACIFIC OCEAN > POLYNESIA > SAMOA","OCEAN > PACIFIC OCEAN > WESTERN PACIFIC OCEAN > MICRONESIA > GUAM","OCEAN > PACIFIC OCEAN > WESTERN PACIFIC OCEAN > MICRONESIA > MARSHALL ISLANDS","ANEMOMETERS > ANEMOMETERS","APS > Air Pressure Sensor","BAROMETERS > BAROMETERS","HUMIDITY SENSORS > HUMIDITY SENSORS","PRESSURE SENSORS > PRESSURE SENSORS","RAIN GAUGES > RAIN GAUGES","TEMPERATURE PROBES > TEMPERATURE PROBES","TEMPERATURE SENSORS > TEMPERATURE SENSORS","THERMISTORS > THERMISTORS","Visibility Sensor > Visibility Sensor","GOES > NOAA Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites","Models > Coastal Ocean Models","NOCMP > National Operational Coastal Modeling Program","NWLON > National Water Level Observation Network","OFS > Operational Forecast Systems","PORTS > Physical Oceanographic Real-Time System","Coastal U.S. territories","Coastal United States","Gulf of Mexico","U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone","DOC/NOAA/NOS/CO-OPS > Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services, National Ocean Service, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce","CO-OPS Metadata Library"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-29T22:48:34.415926","organization":{"aliases":[""],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"5f4f1195-e770-4a2a-8f75-195cd98860ce","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/noaa.png","name":"National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Department of Commerce","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"noaa"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":6,"publisher":"Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services","slug":"meteorological-data-including-visibility","spatial_centroid":{"lat":19.98,"lon":28.380000000000003},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[[-61.8,-14.3],[-61.8,71.4],[-180.0,71.4],[-180.0,-14.3],[-61.8,-14.3]]],[[[180.0,-14.3],[180.0,71.4],[144.6,71.4],[144.6,-14.3],[180.0,-14.3]]]],"type":"MultiPolygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Meteorological Data (including visibility)","type":"dataset"},{"_score":2.2021008,"_sort":[1790722008932,2.2021008,0,"6190e5f3-b470-4186-972c-5fb43ca6325c"],"access_level":"non-public","dcat":{"@type":"dcat:Dataset","accessLevel":"non-public","contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Gajdzik, Laura","hasEmail":"mailto:laura.gajdzik@noaa.gov"},"describedByType":"application/octet-stream","description":"This metadata record describes multiple datasets including traits (reef fish and coral) as well as disturbance exposure (heat and tropical cyclone) of coral reef ecosystems in Guam and the CNMI in 2011 and 2022.  Trait values were inferred from online databases, scientific papers, and gaps were filled in by experts. Environmental disturbance data were generated by scientists of the Ecosystem Sciences Division (ESD) of the Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center (PIFSC). For disturbance exposure, site-level heat stress and cyclone exposure data was generated for 2011 and 2022. These data were derived from NOAA Coral Reef Watch CoralTemp v3.1 daily SST (1985\u2013present) and IBTrACS v4 (1950\u20132022).  Both trait and disturbance exposure datasets described in this metadata record were used with the already archived Mariana Archipelago RAMP (MARAMP) and the National Coral Reef Monitoring Program (NCRMP) data, to generate functional trait-based diversity indices, providing another aspect of reef resilience.\n\nThis project was funded by CRCP Project #36143 titled \"Estimating functional diversity and redundancy of reef communities to inform resilience-based management in the Marianas\". \nLink to publication will be provided once published.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://accession.nodc.noaa.gov/#","describedByType":"application/octet-stream","description":"Fish trait values compiled from literature (reports, publication, etc) and online databases. Traits include: taxon name, mobility, schooling, activity, position, and diet.","mediaType":"text/html","title":"ESD_FISHTRAIT_MARIAN"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://forum.earthdata.nasa.gov/app.php/tag/GCMD%2BKeywords","describedByType":"application/octet-stream","description":"Global Change Master Directory (GCMD). 2026. GCMD Keywords, Version 24. Greenbelt, MD: Earth Science Data and Information System, Earth Science Projects Division, Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). URL (GCMD Keyword Forum Page): https://forum.earthdata.nasa.gov/app.php/tag/GCMD+Keywords","mediaType":"text/html","title":"GCMD Keyword Forum Page"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/79227","describedByType":"application/octet-stream","description":"View the complete metadata record on InPort for more information about this dataset.","mediaType":"text/html","title":"Full Metadata Record"}],"identifier":"https://data.noaa.gov/waf/NOAA/nmfs/pifsc/iso/xml/79227.xml","issued":"2026-01-01T00:00:00.000+00:00","keyword":["DOC/NOAA/NMFS/PIFSC/ESD > Ecosystem Sciences Division, Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce","EARTH SCIENCE > AGRICULTURE > ANIMAL SCIENCE > ANIMAL ECOLOGY AND BEHAVIOR","EARTH SCIENCE > ATMOSPHERE > ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE > ANTICYCLONES/CYCLONES","EARTH SCIENCE > BIOSPHERE > ECOSYSTEMS > MARINE ECOSYSTEMS > BENTHIC","EARTH SCIENCE > BIOSPHERE > ECOSYSTEMS > MARINE ECOSYSTEMS > REEF > CORAL REEF","EARTH SCIENCE > CLIMATE INDICATORS > ATMOSPHERIC/OCEAN INDICATORS > SEA SURFACE TEMPERATURE INDICES","36143","Estimating functional diversity and redundancy of reef communities to inform resilience-based management in the Marianas","Numeric Data Sets > Biology","Numeric Data Sets > Oceanography","EARTH SCIENCE > Biosphere > Aquatic Habitat > Reef Habitat","EARTH SCIENCE > Biosphere > Zoology > Corals > Reef Monitoring and Assessment","EARTH SCIENCE > Oceans > Coastal Processes > Coral Reefs","EARTH SCIENCE > Oceans > Marine Biology > Coral","EARTH SCIENCE > Oceans > Marine Biology > Coral Communities","EARTH SCIENCE > Oceans > Marine Biology > Fish","EARTH SCIENCE > Oceans > Ocean Temperature > Sea Surface Temperature","CORAL REEF","CORAL SPECIES","FISH - CORAL REEF","FISH SPECIES","HABITAT - BENTHIC","Tropical Cyclones","WATER TEMPERATURE","derived products","laboratory analysis","CORAL REEF STUDIES","Coral Reef Conservation Program","National Coral Reef Monitoring Program","Pacific Reef and Assessment Monitoring Program","US DOC; NOAA; NMFS; Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center; Ecosystem Sciences Division","COUNTRY/TERRITORY > Northern Mariana Islands > Rota > Rota Island ( Luta ) (14N145E0007)","COUNTRY/TERRITORY > Northern Mariana Islands > Saipan > Saipan Island (15N145E0002)","COUNTRY/TERRITORY > Northern Mariana Islands > Tinian > Tinian Island (14N145E0005)","COUNTRY/TERRITORY > United States of America > Guam > Guam (13N144E0000)","OCEAN BASIN > Pacific Ocean > Western Pacific Ocean > Guam > Guam (13N144E0000)","OCEAN BASIN > Pacific Ocean > Western Pacific Ocean > Rota Island > Rota Island ( Luta ) (14N145E0007)","OCEAN BASIN > Pacific Ocean > Western Pacific Ocean > Saipan Island > Saipan Island (15N145E0002)","OCEAN BASIN > Pacific Ocean > Western Pacific Ocean > Tinian Island Reefs > Tinian Island (14N145E0005)","OCEAN > PACIFIC OCEAN > WESTERN PACIFIC OCEAN > MICRONESIA > GUAM","NW Pacific (limit-180)","CNMI","CRED","CREP","Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands","Coral Reef Ecosystem Division","Coral Reef Ecosystem Program","ESD","Ecosystem Sciences Division","Guam","Mariana Archipelago","Mariana Islands","Marianas","PIFSC","Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center","DOC/NOAA/NMFS/PIFSC > Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce","PIFSC Publication"],"landingPage":"https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/79227","language":[],"license":"https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","modified":"2026-01-01T00:00:00.000+00:00","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center"},"rights":"otherRestrictions, unclassified","spatial":"145.85,13.2,144.6,15.35","temporal":"2011-04-06T00:00:00+00:00/2022-06-01T00:00:00+00:00","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Reef Fish and Coral Traits, as well as Disturbance Exposure (Heat and Cyclone) of Coral Reefs in Guam and the CNMI in 2011 and 2022"},"description":"This metadata record describes multiple datasets including traits (reef fish and coral) as well as disturbance exposure (heat and tropical cyclone) of coral reef ecosystems in Guam and the CNMI in 2011 and 2022.  Trait values were inferred from online databases, scientific papers, and gaps were filled in by experts. Environmental disturbance data were generated by scientists of the Ecosystem Sciences Division (ESD) of the Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center (PIFSC). For disturbance exposure, site-level heat stress and cyclone exposure data was generated for 2011 and 2022. These data were derived from NOAA Coral Reef Watch CoralTemp v3.1 daily SST (1985\u2013present) and IBTrACS v4 (1950\u20132022).  Both trait and disturbance exposure datasets described in this metadata record were used with the already archived Mariana Archipelago RAMP (MARAMP) and the National Coral Reef Monitoring Program (NCRMP) data, to generate functional trait-based diversity indices, providing another aspect of reef resilience.\n\nThis project was funded by CRCP Project #36143 titled \"Estimating functional diversity and redundancy of reef communities to inform resilience-based management in the Marianas\". \nLink to publication will be provided once published.","distribution_titles":["ESD_FISHTRAIT_MARIAN","GCMD Keyword Forum Page","Full Metadata Record"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/bbcaa7b7-67e6-4a1a-a7b6-64fb207440d0","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/bbcaa7b7-67e6-4a1a-a7b6-64fb207440d0/raw","harvest_record_transformed":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/bbcaa7b7-67e6-4a1a-a7b6-64fb207440d0/transformed","has_download":false,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"https://data.noaa.gov/waf/NOAA/nmfs/pifsc/iso/xml/79227.xml","keyword":["DOC/NOAA/NMFS/PIFSC/ESD > Ecosystem Sciences Division, Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce","EARTH SCIENCE > AGRICULTURE > ANIMAL SCIENCE > ANIMAL ECOLOGY AND BEHAVIOR","EARTH SCIENCE > ATMOSPHERE > ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE > ANTICYCLONES/CYCLONES","EARTH SCIENCE > BIOSPHERE > ECOSYSTEMS > MARINE ECOSYSTEMS > BENTHIC","EARTH SCIENCE > BIOSPHERE > ECOSYSTEMS > MARINE ECOSYSTEMS > REEF > CORAL REEF","EARTH SCIENCE > CLIMATE INDICATORS > ATMOSPHERIC/OCEAN INDICATORS > SEA SURFACE TEMPERATURE INDICES","36143","Estimating functional diversity and redundancy of reef communities to inform resilience-based management in the Marianas","Numeric Data Sets > Biology","Numeric Data Sets > Oceanography","EARTH SCIENCE > Biosphere > Aquatic Habitat > Reef Habitat","EARTH SCIENCE > Biosphere > Zoology > Corals > Reef Monitoring and Assessment","EARTH SCIENCE > Oceans > Coastal Processes > Coral Reefs","EARTH SCIENCE > Oceans > Marine Biology > Coral","EARTH SCIENCE > Oceans > Marine Biology > Coral Communities","EARTH SCIENCE > Oceans > Marine Biology > Fish","EARTH SCIENCE > Oceans > Ocean Temperature > Sea Surface Temperature","CORAL REEF","CORAL SPECIES","FISH - CORAL REEF","FISH SPECIES","HABITAT - BENTHIC","Tropical Cyclones","WATER TEMPERATURE","derived products","laboratory analysis","CORAL REEF STUDIES","Coral Reef Conservation Program","National Coral Reef Monitoring Program","Pacific Reef and Assessment Monitoring Program","US DOC; NOAA; NMFS; Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center; Ecosystem Sciences Division","COUNTRY/TERRITORY > Northern Mariana Islands > Rota > Rota Island ( Luta ) (14N145E0007)","COUNTRY/TERRITORY > Northern Mariana Islands > Saipan > Saipan Island (15N145E0002)","COUNTRY/TERRITORY > Northern Mariana Islands > Tinian > Tinian Island (14N145E0005)","COUNTRY/TERRITORY > United States of America > Guam > Guam (13N144E0000)","OCEAN BASIN > Pacific Ocean > Western Pacific Ocean > Guam > Guam (13N144E0000)","OCEAN BASIN > Pacific Ocean > Western Pacific Ocean > Rota Island > Rota Island ( Luta ) (14N145E0007)","OCEAN BASIN > Pacific Ocean > Western Pacific Ocean > Saipan Island > Saipan Island (15N145E0002)","OCEAN BASIN > Pacific Ocean > Western Pacific Ocean > Tinian Island Reefs > Tinian Island (14N145E0005)","OCEAN > PACIFIC OCEAN > WESTERN PACIFIC OCEAN > MICRONESIA > GUAM","NW Pacific (limit-180)","CNMI","CRED","CREP","Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands","Coral Reef Ecosystem Division","Coral Reef Ecosystem Program","ESD","Ecosystem Sciences Division","Guam","Mariana Archipelago","Mariana Islands","Marianas","PIFSC","Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center","DOC/NOAA/NMFS/PIFSC > Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce","PIFSC Publication"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-29T22:46:48.932365","organization":{"aliases":[""],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"5f4f1195-e770-4a2a-8f75-195cd98860ce","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/noaa.png","name":"National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Department of Commerce","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"noaa"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center","slug":"reef-fish-and-coral-traits-as-well-as-disturbance-exposure-heat-and-cyclone-of-coral--2022","spatial_centroid":{"lat":14.059999999999999,"lon":145.35},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[145.85,13.2],[145.85,15.35],[144.6,15.35],[144.6,13.2],[145.85,13.2]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Reef Fish and Coral Traits, as well as Disturbance Exposure (Heat and Cyclone) of Coral Reefs in Guam and the CNMI in 2011 and 2022","type":"dataset"},{"_score":9.365789,"_sort":[1790722007003,9.365789,0,"568dfc80-0faf-4183-998b-bf8dc8f7b763"],"access_level":"non-public","dcat":{"@type":"dcat:Dataset","accessLevel":"non-public","contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Barkley, Hannah C","hasEmail":"mailto:hannah.barkley@noaa.gov"},"describedByType":"application/octet-stream","description":"The calcification rate data described here are derived from Calcification Accretion Units (CAUs) that were deployed and retrieved at long-term climate monitoring sites during NOAA Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center (PIFSC), Ecosystem Sciences Division (ESD) led National Coral Reef Monitoring Program (NCRMP) missions across the Pacific Remote Island Regions in 2014, 2015, 2017, 2018, and 2023 as well as pre-NCRMP missions in 2010, 2011, and 2012. CAUs are PVC settlement plates that facilitate the recruitment and colonization of crustose coralline algae, hard corals, and other reef calcifiers. Laboratory experiments show that CCA and coral calcification rates are strongly correlated with seawater chemistry, and shifts in carbonate chemistry conditions due to ocean acidification could lead to reduced calcification and accretion rates and ecological phase shifts in coral reef communities.\n\nCoral reef calcium carbonate accretion rates can be estimated by measuring the change in weight of the CAUs between deployment and retrieval. Monitoring net accretion over successive deployments allows for the detection of changes in reef calcification rates over time. Five units were deployed on the seafloor at each CAU site for 3 years in 2015 and 5 years in 2018. The number of processed CAUs for a site may be less than the number deployed, either because the units were lost or damaged at sea and therefore not recovered, or in rare instances, due to errors during laboratory processing.\n\nThis study provides information about spatial and temporal patterns of reef carbonate calcification and accretion rates and serves as a basis for detecting changes associated with changing seawater chemistry due to ocean acidification. These data can also be used in comparative analyses across natural gradients, thereby assisting efforts to determine whether key reef-building taxa can acclimatize to changing oceanographic environments. These data will have immediate, direct impacts on predictions of reef resilience in a higher carbon dioxide (CO2) world and on the design of reef management strategies.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://accession.nodc.noaa.gov/0137093","describedByType":"application/octet-stream","description":"CAU unit recoveries collected across the Pacific Remote Island Areas (Baker, Howland, Jarvis, Johnston, Kingman, Palmyra) by the PIFSC Ecosystem Sciences Division during pre-NCRMP mission in 2012 (HA1201). These CAU units were deployed during pre-NCRMP missions in 2010 (HA1001). Data include calcification rates per CAU unit.","mediaType":"text/html","title":"ESD_NCRMP_CAU_2012_PRIAs.csv"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://accession.nodc.noaa.gov/0175166","describedByType":"application/octet-stream","description":"CAU unit recoveries collected across the Pacific Remote Island Areas (Wake) by the PIFSC Ecosystem Sciences Division during MARAMP 2017 (HA1701). These CAU units were deployed during MARAMP 2014 (HA1401). Data include calcification rates per CAU unit.","mediaType":"text/html","title":"ESD_NCRMP_CAU_2017_PRIAs.csv"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://accession.nodc.noaa.gov/0231439","describedByType":"application/octet-stream","description":"CAU unit recoveries collected across the Pacific Remote Island Areas (Baker, Howland, and Jarvis Islands, Kingman Reef, and Palmyra atolls) by the PIFSC Ecosystem Sciences Division during ASRAMP 2018 (HA1801). These CAU units were deployed during ASRAMP 2015 (HA1501), with the exception of one CAU unit from Jarvis Island that was deployed during pre-NCRMP mission in 2012 (HA1201). Data include calcification rates per CAU unit.","mediaType":"text/html","title":"ESD_NCRMP_CAU_2018_PRIAs.csv"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://accession.nodc.noaa.gov/0159156","describedByType":"application/octet-stream","description":"CAU unit recoveries collected across the Pacific Remote Island Areas (Baker, Howland, Jarvis, Johnston, Kingman, Palmyra) by the PIFSC Ecosystem Sciences Division during ASRAMP 2015 (HA1501). These CAU units were deployed during pre-NCRMP mission in 2012 (HA1201). Data include calcification rates per CAU unit.","mediaType":"text/html","title":"ESD_NCRMP_CAU_2015_PRIAs.csv"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://accession.nodc.noaa.gov/0159151","describedByType":"application/octet-stream","description":"CAU unit recoveries collected across the Pacific Remote Island Areas (Wake) by the PIFSC Ecosystem Sciences Division during MARAMP 2014 (HA1401). These CAU units were deployed during pre-NCRMP missions in 2011 (HA1101). Data include calcification rates per CAU unit.","mediaType":"text/html","title":"ESD_NCRMP_CAU_2014_PRIAs.csv"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://accession.nodc.noaa.gov/0318706","describedByType":"application/octet-stream","description":"Quality control report generated for recovered CAU data from sites across the Pacific Remote Island Areas (Baker, Howland) by the PIFSC Ecosystem Sciences Division during ASRAMP 2023 (RA2301).","mediaType":"text/html","title":"ESD_NCRMP_CAU_2023_PRIAs_QC.pdf"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://forum.earthdata.nasa.gov/app.php/tag/GCMD%2BKeywords","describedByType":"application/octet-stream","description":"Global Change Master Directory (GCMD). 2026. GCMD Keywords, Version 24. Greenbelt, MD: Earth Science Data and Information System, Earth Science Projects Division, Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). URL (GCMD Keyword Forum Page): https://forum.earthdata.nasa.gov/app.php/tag/GCMD+Keywords","mediaType":"text/html","title":"GCMD Keyword Forum Page"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/36069","describedByType":"application/octet-stream","description":"View the complete metadata record on InPort for more information about this dataset.","mediaType":"text/html","title":"Full Metadata Record"}],"identifier":"https://data.noaa.gov/waf/NOAA/nmfs/pifsc/iso/xml/36069.xml","issued":"2016-01-01T00:00:00.000+00:00","keyword":["DOC/NOAA/NMFS/PIFSC/ESD > Ecosystem Sciences Division, Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce","EARTH SCIENCE > BIOSPHERE > ECOSYSTEMS > MARINE ECOSYSTEMS > BENTHIC","EARTH SCIENCE > BIOSPHERE > ECOSYSTEMS > MARINE ECOSYSTEMS > REEF > CORAL REEF","OCEAN > PACIFIC OCEAN > CENTRAL PACIFIC OCEAN > BAKER ISLAND","OCEAN > PACIFIC OCEAN > CENTRAL PACIFIC OCEAN > HOWLAND ISLAND","OCEAN > PACIFIC OCEAN > CENTRAL PACIFIC OCEAN > JARVIS ISLAND","OCEAN > PACIFIC OCEAN > CENTRAL PACIFIC OCEAN > JOHNSTON ATOLL","OCEAN > PACIFIC OCEAN > CENTRAL PACIFIC OCEAN > KINGMAN REEF","OCEAN > PACIFIC OCEAN > CENTRAL PACIFIC OCEAN > PALMYRA ATOLL","1221","409","587","743","C204 Pacific Reef Assessment and Monitoring Program (Pacific RAMP): Biennial monitoring for the US Pacific Islands and Atolls","National Coral Reef Monitoring Program","Ocean Acidification - Quantification of Calcification and Accretion Rates of Corals and Crustose Coralline Algae across the Pacific Ocean","Pacific Reef Assessment and Monitoring Program: Monitoring coral reef ecosystems of the US Pacific Islands and Atolls","Numeric Data Sets > Calcification Rate","EARTH SCIENCE > Biosphere > Aquatic Habitat > Reef Habitat","EARTH SCIENCE > Biosphere > Vegetation > Algae > Algal Cover","EARTH SCIENCE > Biosphere > Vegetation > Algae > Algal Growth > Calcification Rate","EARTH SCIENCE > Biosphere > Vegetation > Algae > Calcareous Macroalgae","EARTH SCIENCE > Biosphere > Vegetation > Algae > Crustose Coralline Algae","EARTH SCIENCE > Biosphere > Vegetation > Algae > Encrusting Macroalgae","EARTH SCIENCE > Biosphere > Vegetation > Algae > Fleshy Macroalgae","EARTH SCIENCE > Biosphere > Vegetation > Algae > Reef Monitoring and Assessment","EARTH SCIENCE > Biosphere > Vegetation > Algae > Reef Monitoring and Assessment > Calcification Accretion Unit (CAU)","EARTH SCIENCE > Biosphere > Zoology > Corals > Reef Monitoring and Assessment","EARTH SCIENCE > Oceans > Coastal Processes > Coral Reefs","EARTH SCIENCE > Oceans > Ocean Chemistry > Calcification","EARTH SCIENCE > Oceans > Ocean Chemistry > Carbonate Chemistry","EARTH SCIENCE > Oceans > Ocean Chemistry > Ocean Acidification","CALCIFICATION","in situ","laboratory analyses","CORAL REEF STUDIES","Coral Reef Conservation Program","National Coral Reef Monitoring Program","Pacific Reef and Assessment Monitoring Program","US DOC; NOAA; Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research; Ocean Acidification Program","US DOC; NOAA; NMFS; Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center; Ecosystem Sciences Division","COUNTRY/TERRITORY > United States of America > USA Minor Outlying Islands > Baker Island (00N176W0001)","COUNTRY/TERRITORY > United States of America > USA Minor Outlying Islands > Howland Island (00S176W0001)","COUNTRY/TERRITORY > United States of America > USA Minor Outlying Islands > Jarvis Island (00S160W0001)","COUNTRY/TERRITORY > United States of America > USA Minor Outlying Islands > Johnston Atoll (16N169W0001)","COUNTRY/TERRITORY > United States of America > USA Minor Outlying Islands > Kingman Reef (06N162W0001)","COUNTRY/TERRITORY > United States of America > USA Minor Outlying Islands > Palmyra Atoll (05N162W0001)","COUNTRY/TERRITORY > United States of America > USA Minor Outlying Islands > Wake Atoll (19N167E0001)","OCEAN BASIN > Pacific Ocean > Central Pacific Ocean > Baker Island > Baker Island (00N176W0001)","OCEAN BASIN > Pacific Ocean > Central Pacific Ocean > Howland Island > Howland Island (00S176W0001)","OCEAN BASIN > Pacific Ocean > Central Pacific Ocean > Johnston Atoll > Johnston Atoll (16N169W0001)","OCEAN BASIN > Pacific Ocean > Central Pacific Ocean > Line Islands > Jarvis Island (00S160W0001)","OCEAN BASIN > Pacific Ocean > Central Pacific Ocean > Line Islands > Kingman Reef (06N162W0001)","OCEAN BASIN > Pacific Ocean > Central Pacific Ocean > Line Islands > Palmyra Atoll (05N162W0001)","OCEAN BASIN > Pacific Ocean > Central Pacific Ocean > Wake Atoll > Wake Atoll (19N167E0001)","Central Pacific Ocean","Equatorial Pacific Ocean","Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument","HI'IALAKAI","RAINIER","ASRAMP","American Samoa Reef Assessment and Monitoring Program","CRED","CREP","Calcification Plate","Coral Reef Ecosystem Division","Coral Reef Ecosystem Program","ESD","Ecosystem Sciences Division","NCRMP","Ocean Acidification","PIFSC","Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center","RAMP","Reef Assessment and Monitoring Program","Settlement Plate","calcification accretion unit","triennial","PRIA","PRIMNM","Pacific Remote Island Areas","Calcification Accretion Unit (CAU)","DOC/NOAA/NMFS/PIFSC > Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce","Pacific Remote Island Areas"],"landingPage":"https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/36069","language":[],"license":"https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","modified":"2026-01-01T00:00:00.000+00:00","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center"},"rights":"otherRestrictions, unclassified","spatial":"-159.9788,-0.38235459,-176.6239,16.7633668","temporal":"2012-03-02T00:00:00+00:00/2015-04-27T00:00:00+00:00","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"National Coral Reef Monitoring Program: Calcification Rates of Crustose Coralline Algae Derived from Calcification Accretion Units (CAUs) Deployed across the Pacific Remote Island Areas from 2010 to 2023"},"description":"The calcification rate data described here are derived from Calcification Accretion Units (CAUs) that were deployed and retrieved at long-term climate monitoring sites during NOAA Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center (PIFSC), Ecosystem Sciences Division (ESD) led National Coral Reef Monitoring Program (NCRMP) missions across the Pacific Remote Island Regions in 2014, 2015, 2017, 2018, and 2023 as well as pre-NCRMP missions in 2010, 2011, and 2012. CAUs are PVC settlement plates that facilitate the recruitment and colonization of crustose coralline algae, hard corals, and other reef calcifiers. Laboratory experiments show that CCA and coral calcification rates are strongly correlated with seawater chemistry, and shifts in carbonate chemistry conditions due to ocean acidification could lead to reduced calcification and accretion rates and ecological phase shifts in coral reef communities.\n\nCoral reef calcium carbonate accretion rates can be estimated by measuring the change in weight of the CAUs between deployment and retrieval. Monitoring net accretion over successive deployments allows for the detection of changes in reef calcification rates over time. Five units were deployed on the seafloor at each CAU site for 3 years in 2015 and 5 years in 2018. The number of processed CAUs for a site may be less than the number deployed, either because the units were lost or damaged at sea and therefore not recovered, or in rare instances, due to errors during laboratory processing.\n\nThis study provides information about spatial and temporal patterns of reef carbonate calcification and accretion rates and serves as a basis for detecting changes associated with changing seawater chemistry due to ocean acidification. These data can also be used in comparative analyses across natural gradients, thereby assisting efforts to determine whether key reef-building taxa can acclimatize to changing oceanographic environments. These data will have immediate, direct impacts on predictions of reef resilience in a higher carbon dioxide (CO2) world and on the design of reef management strategies.","distribution_titles":["ESD_NCRMP_CAU_2012_PRIAs.csv","ESD_NCRMP_CAU_2017_PRIAs.csv","ESD_NCRMP_CAU_2018_PRIAs.csv","ESD_NCRMP_CAU_2015_PRIAs.csv","ESD_NCRMP_CAU_2014_PRIAs.csv","ESD_NCRMP_CAU_2023_PRIAs_QC.pdf","GCMD Keyword Forum Page","Full Metadata Record"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/18855a20-4631-4ce5-9df3-6f769695f8f1","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/18855a20-4631-4ce5-9df3-6f769695f8f1/raw","harvest_record_transformed":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/18855a20-4631-4ce5-9df3-6f769695f8f1/transformed","has_download":false,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"https://data.noaa.gov/waf/NOAA/nmfs/pifsc/iso/xml/36069.xml","keyword":["DOC/NOAA/NMFS/PIFSC/ESD > Ecosystem Sciences Division, Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce","EARTH SCIENCE > BIOSPHERE > ECOSYSTEMS > MARINE ECOSYSTEMS > BENTHIC","EARTH SCIENCE > BIOSPHERE > ECOSYSTEMS > MARINE ECOSYSTEMS > REEF > CORAL REEF","OCEAN > PACIFIC OCEAN > CENTRAL PACIFIC OCEAN > BAKER ISLAND","OCEAN > PACIFIC OCEAN > CENTRAL PACIFIC OCEAN > HOWLAND ISLAND","OCEAN > PACIFIC OCEAN > CENTRAL PACIFIC OCEAN > JARVIS ISLAND","OCEAN > PACIFIC OCEAN > CENTRAL PACIFIC OCEAN > JOHNSTON ATOLL","OCEAN > PACIFIC OCEAN > CENTRAL PACIFIC OCEAN > KINGMAN REEF","OCEAN > PACIFIC OCEAN > CENTRAL PACIFIC OCEAN > PALMYRA ATOLL","1221","409","587","743","C204 Pacific Reef Assessment and Monitoring Program (Pacific RAMP): Biennial monitoring for the US Pacific Islands and Atolls","National Coral Reef Monitoring Program","Ocean Acidification - Quantification of Calcification and Accretion Rates of Corals and Crustose Coralline Algae across the Pacific Ocean","Pacific Reef Assessment and Monitoring Program: Monitoring coral reef ecosystems of the US Pacific Islands and Atolls","Numeric Data Sets > Calcification Rate","EARTH SCIENCE > Biosphere > Aquatic Habitat > Reef Habitat","EARTH SCIENCE > Biosphere > Vegetation > Algae > Algal Cover","EARTH SCIENCE > Biosphere > Vegetation > Algae > Algal Growth > Calcification Rate","EARTH SCIENCE > Biosphere > Vegetation > Algae > Calcareous Macroalgae","EARTH SCIENCE > Biosphere > Vegetation > Algae > Crustose Coralline Algae","EARTH SCIENCE > Biosphere > Vegetation > Algae > Encrusting Macroalgae","EARTH SCIENCE > Biosphere > Vegetation > Algae > Fleshy Macroalgae","EARTH SCIENCE > Biosphere > Vegetation > Algae > Reef Monitoring and Assessment","EARTH SCIENCE > Biosphere > Vegetation > Algae > Reef Monitoring and Assessment > Calcification Accretion Unit (CAU)","EARTH SCIENCE > Biosphere > Zoology > Corals > Reef Monitoring and Assessment","EARTH SCIENCE > Oceans > Coastal Processes > Coral Reefs","EARTH SCIENCE > Oceans > Ocean Chemistry > Calcification","EARTH SCIENCE > Oceans > Ocean Chemistry > Carbonate Chemistry","EARTH SCIENCE > Oceans > Ocean Chemistry > Ocean Acidification","CALCIFICATION","in situ","laboratory analyses","CORAL REEF STUDIES","Coral Reef Conservation Program","National Coral Reef Monitoring Program","Pacific Reef and Assessment Monitoring Program","US DOC; NOAA; Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research; Ocean Acidification Program","US DOC; NOAA; NMFS; Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center; Ecosystem Sciences Division","COUNTRY/TERRITORY > United States of America > USA Minor Outlying Islands > Baker Island (00N176W0001)","COUNTRY/TERRITORY > United States of America > USA Minor Outlying Islands > Howland Island (00S176W0001)","COUNTRY/TERRITORY > United States of America > USA Minor Outlying Islands > Jarvis Island (00S160W0001)","COUNTRY/TERRITORY > United States of America > USA Minor Outlying Islands > Johnston Atoll (16N169W0001)","COUNTRY/TERRITORY > United States of America > USA Minor Outlying Islands > Kingman Reef (06N162W0001)","COUNTRY/TERRITORY > United States of America > USA Minor Outlying Islands > Palmyra Atoll (05N162W0001)","COUNTRY/TERRITORY > United States of America > USA Minor Outlying Islands > Wake Atoll (19N167E0001)","OCEAN BASIN > Pacific Ocean > Central Pacific Ocean > Baker Island > Baker Island (00N176W0001)","OCEAN BASIN > Pacific Ocean > Central Pacific Ocean > Howland Island > Howland Island (00S176W0001)","OCEAN BASIN > Pacific Ocean > Central Pacific Ocean > Johnston Atoll > Johnston Atoll (16N169W0001)","OCEAN BASIN > Pacific Ocean > Central Pacific Ocean > Line Islands > Jarvis Island (00S160W0001)","OCEAN BASIN > Pacific Ocean > Central Pacific Ocean > Line Islands > Kingman Reef (06N162W0001)","OCEAN BASIN > Pacific Ocean > Central Pacific Ocean > Line Islands > Palmyra Atoll (05N162W0001)","OCEAN BASIN > Pacific Ocean > Central Pacific Ocean > Wake Atoll > Wake Atoll (19N167E0001)","Central Pacific Ocean","Equatorial Pacific Ocean","Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument","HI'IALAKAI","RAINIER","ASRAMP","American Samoa Reef Assessment and Monitoring Program","CRED","CREP","Calcification Plate","Coral Reef Ecosystem Division","Coral Reef Ecosystem Program","ESD","Ecosystem Sciences Division","NCRMP","Ocean Acidification","PIFSC","Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center","RAMP","Reef Assessment and Monitoring Program","Settlement Plate","calcification accretion unit","triennial","PRIA","PRIMNM","Pacific Remote Island Areas","Calcification Accretion Unit (CAU)","DOC/NOAA/NMFS/PIFSC > Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce","Pacific Remote Island Areas"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-29T22:46:47.003597","organization":{"aliases":[""],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"5f4f1195-e770-4a2a-8f75-195cd98860ce","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/noaa.png","name":"National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Department of Commerce","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"noaa"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center","slug":"national-coral-reef-monitoring-program-calcification-rates-of-crustose-coralline-alga-2023","spatial_centroid":{"lat":6.4759339659999995,"lon":-166.63684},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-159.9788,-0.38235459],[-159.9788,16.7633668],[-176.6239,16.7633668],[-176.6239,-0.38235459],[-159.9788,-0.38235459]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"National Coral Reef Monitoring Program: Calcification Rates of Crustose Coralline Algae Derived from Calcification Accretion Units (CAUs) Deployed across the Pacific Remote Island Areas from 2010 to 2023","type":"dataset"},{"_score":21.686657,"_sort":[1790719430488,21.686657,1,"f7b550e9-2307-4b7d-84fe-355ff778cb91"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"@type":"dcat:Dataset","accessLevel":"public","contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Vimal Amin","hasEmail":"mailto:no-reply@opendata.maryland.gov"},"description":"This is a subset of the Maryland 2006-2023 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory dataset. This subset includes only the gross emissions sources and excludes the Forestry & Land Use emissions sinks.\n\nThe Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Act (Maryland Code, Environment Article \u00a72-1203) requires the Maryland Department of the Environment to prepare and publish an updated inventory of statewide greenhouse gas emissions on a three-year cycle. This dataset covers the inventory years of 2006, 2011, 2014, 2017, 2020, and 2023.\n\nMaryland's greenhouse gas emissions inventory tracks emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) occurring in the state and from out-of-state electricity generation consumed in the state. These gases have differing lifetimes in the atmosphere and differing warming impacts. The Global Warming Potential (GWP) is a measure of the warming impact of a particular gas over a particular time horizon. GWP values allow for aggregating emissions of the different greenhouse gases into a single metric, known as carbon dioxide equivalent, and reported in the inventory in million metric tons (MMTCO2e). \n\nAs required by the Climate Solutions Now Act of 2022, MD's GHG inventory reports emissions with a GWP considered over a 20-year time horizon. Emissions are also presented using a GWP over a 100-yr time horizon, consistent with conventional national and international inventory protocols. The 20-yr GWP emissions are to be used in evaluating progress towards Maryland's GHG reduction goals.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","describedBy":"https://opendata.maryland.gov/api/views/xuyh-dmw3/columns.json","describedByType":"application/json","downloadURL":"https://opendata.maryland.gov/api/v3/views/xuyh-dmw3/query.json?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"application/json"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","describedBy":"https://opendata.maryland.gov/api/views/xuyh-dmw3/columns.xml","describedByType":"application/xml","downloadURL":"https://opendata.maryland.gov/api/v3/views/xuyh-dmw3/query.xml?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"application/xml"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://opendata.maryland.gov/api/v3/views/xuyh-dmw3/export.csv?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"text/csv"}],"identifier":"https://opendata.maryland.gov/api/views/xuyh-dmw3","issued":"2022-09-27","keyword":["air and radiation administration (ara)","climate change","greenhouse gas"],"landingPage":"https://opendata.maryland.gov/d/xuyh-dmw3","modified":"2026-09-23","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"opendata.maryland.gov"},"theme":["Energy and Environment"],"title":"Maryland 2006-2023 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory - gross emissions subset"},"description":"This is a subset of the Maryland 2006-2023 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory dataset. This subset includes only the gross emissions sources and excludes the Forestry & Land Use emissions sinks.\n\nThe Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Act (Maryland Code, Environment Article \u00a72-1203) requires the Maryland Department of the Environment to prepare and publish an updated inventory of statewide greenhouse gas emissions on a three-year cycle. This dataset covers the inventory years of 2006, 2011, 2014, 2017, 2020, and 2023.\n\nMaryland's greenhouse gas emissions inventory tracks emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) occurring in the state and from out-of-state electricity generation consumed in the state. These gases have differing lifetimes in the atmosphere and differing warming impacts. The Global Warming Potential (GWP) is a measure of the warming impact of a particular gas over a particular time horizon. GWP values allow for aggregating emissions of the different greenhouse gases into a single metric, known as carbon dioxide equivalent, and reported in the inventory in million metric tons (MMTCO2e). \n\nAs required by the Climate Solutions Now Act of 2022, MD's GHG inventory reports emissions with a GWP considered over a 20-year time horizon. Emissions are also presented using a GWP over a 100-yr time horizon, consistent with conventional national and international inventory protocols. The 20-yr GWP emissions are to be used in evaluating progress towards Maryland's GHG reduction goals.","distribution_titles":[],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/bec56e56-3db2-428e-b309-3a04fc370f47","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/bec56e56-3db2-428e-b309-3a04fc370f47/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":false,"identifier":"https://opendata.maryland.gov/api/views/xuyh-dmw3","keyword":["air and radiation administration (ara)","climate change","greenhouse gas"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-29T22:03:50.488911","organization":{"aliases":["md"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"b98a6f3b-552a-4826-931e-4594420f4596","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/datamaryland_logo_lower_400px_noback.png","name":"State of Maryland","organization_type":"State Government","slug":"maryland"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":1,"publisher":"opendata.maryland.gov","slug":"maryland-2006-2020-greenhouse-gas-emissions-inventory-gross-emissions-subset","spatial_centroid":null,"spatial_shape":null,"theme":["Energy and Environment"],"title":"Maryland 2006-2023 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory - gross emissions subset","type":"dataset"},{"_score":22.221407,"_sort":[1790719428300,22.221407,5,"5da319e2-0c01-447c-b624-8d86bb902784"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"@type":"dcat:Dataset","accessLevel":"public","contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Vimal Amin","hasEmail":"mailto:no-reply@opendata.maryland.gov"},"description":"The Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Act (Maryland Code, Environment Article \u00a72-1203) requires the Maryland Department of the Environment to prepare and publish an updated inventory of statewide greenhouse gas emissions on a three-year cycle. This dataset covers the inventory years of 2006, 2011, 2014, 2017, 2020, and 2023.\n\nMaryland's greenhouse gas emissions inventory tracks emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) occurring in the state and from out-of-state electricity generation consumed in the state. These gases have differing lifetimes in the atmosphere and differing warming impacts. The Global Warming Potential (GWP) is a measure of the warming impact of a particular gas over a particular time horizon. GWP values allow for aggregating emissions of the different greenhouse gases into a single metric, known as carbon dioxide equivalent, and reported in the inventory in million metric tons (MMTCO2e). \n\nAs required by the Climate Solutions Now Act of 2022, MD's GHG inventory reports emissions with a GWP considered over a 20-year time horizon. Emissions are also presented using a GWP over a 100-yr time horizon, consistent with conventional national and international inventory protocols. The 20-yr GWP emissions are to be used in evaluating progress towards Maryland's GHG reduction goals.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","describedBy":"https://opendata.maryland.gov/api/views/xabh-m3bt/columns.json","describedByType":"application/json","downloadURL":"https://opendata.maryland.gov/api/v3/views/xabh-m3bt/query.json?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"application/json"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","describedBy":"https://opendata.maryland.gov/api/views/xabh-m3bt/columns.xml","describedByType":"application/xml","downloadURL":"https://opendata.maryland.gov/api/v3/views/xabh-m3bt/query.xml?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"application/xml"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","downloadURL":"https://opendata.maryland.gov/api/v3/views/xabh-m3bt/export.csv?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"text/csv"}],"identifier":"https://opendata.maryland.gov/api/views/xabh-m3bt","issued":"2022-09-27","keyword":["air and radiation administration (ara)","climate change","greenhouse gas"],"landingPage":"https://opendata.maryland.gov/d/xabh-m3bt","modified":"2026-09-23","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"opendata.maryland.gov"},"theme":["Energy and Environment"],"title":"Maryland 2006-2023 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory"},"description":"The Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Act (Maryland Code, Environment Article \u00a72-1203) requires the Maryland Department of the Environment to prepare and publish an updated inventory of statewide greenhouse gas emissions on a three-year cycle. This dataset covers the inventory years of 2006, 2011, 2014, 2017, 2020, and 2023.\n\nMaryland's greenhouse gas emissions inventory tracks emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) occurring in the state and from out-of-state electricity generation consumed in the state. These gases have differing lifetimes in the atmosphere and differing warming impacts. The Global Warming Potential (GWP) is a measure of the warming impact of a particular gas over a particular time horizon. GWP values allow for aggregating emissions of the different greenhouse gases into a single metric, known as carbon dioxide equivalent, and reported in the inventory in million metric tons (MMTCO2e). \n\nAs required by the Climate Solutions Now Act of 2022, MD's GHG inventory reports emissions with a GWP considered over a 20-year time horizon. Emissions are also presented using a GWP over a 100-yr time horizon, consistent with conventional national and international inventory protocols. The 20-yr GWP emissions are to be used in evaluating progress towards Maryland's GHG reduction goals.","distribution_titles":[],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/9ece333f-496a-4346-8b98-ce427ce20373","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/9ece333f-496a-4346-8b98-ce427ce20373/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":false,"identifier":"https://opendata.maryland.gov/api/views/xabh-m3bt","keyword":["air and radiation administration (ara)","climate change","greenhouse gas"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-29T22:03:48.300026","organization":{"aliases":["md"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"b98a6f3b-552a-4826-931e-4594420f4596","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/datamaryland_logo_lower_400px_noback.png","name":"State of Maryland","organization_type":"State Government","slug":"maryland"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":5,"publisher":"opendata.maryland.gov","slug":"maryland-2006-2020-greenhouse-gas-emissions-inventory","spatial_centroid":null,"spatial_shape":null,"theme":["Energy and Environment"],"title":"Maryland 2006-2023 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory","type":"dataset"},{"_score":10.508976,"_sort":[1790719015222,10.508976,9,"db000b57-a3c5-4244-90ba-1ceb8978ffe5"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"@type":"dcat:Dataset","accessLevel":"public","contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"DCGISopendata","hasEmail":"mailto:gisgroup@dc.gov"},"description":"<div style=\"text-align:Left;\"><div><div><p><span>The BEPS Program was created by Title III of the?Clean Energy DC Omnibus Act of 2018. The BEPS is a minimum threshold of energy performance that will be no lower than the local median?ENERGY STAR?score by property type (or equivalent metric). The standards were created to drive energy performance in existing buildings to help meet the energy and climate goals of the?Sustainable DC?plan \u2014 to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption by 50% by 2032. DOEE established the first set of Standards on January 1, 2021. Standards will then be set every 6 years, creating BEPS Periods (BEPS Period 1, BEPS Period 2, etc.). The 2021 Building Energy Performance Standards and a Guide to the 2021 BEPS are available for viewing on DOEE\u2019s website.</span></p><p><span>To improve transparency and help building owners understand how their building performs relative to the BEPS, DOEE is publishing this BEPS Disclosure that compares a building\u2019s benchmarking data with the BEPS and provides an estimate of the building\u2019s distance from the standard and estimated performance requirement.</span></p><p><span>Please note that this dataset is based on information currently available to DOEE using calendar year 2019 benchmarking data provided by the building owner. Some buildings are still being evaluated and therefore have been designated as \u201cUnder Review\u201d in this dataset. Building owners that believe their 2019 calendar year data is incorrect should contact the Benchmarking Help Center (info.benchmark@dc.gov). Additionally, buildings that meet certain criteria may request a variance from the standards by submitting a variance request form on the DOEE website.</span></p></div></div></div>","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://maps2.dcgis.dc.gov/DCGIS/rest/services/DCGIS_DATA/Environment_Energy_WebMercator/FeatureServer/75","format":"ArcGIS GeoServices REST API","mediaType":"application/json","title":"ArcGIS GeoService"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://opendata.dc.gov/api/download/v1/items/10f4f09fc5684d9988ae83ae4cca8b70/csv?layers=75","format":"CSV","mediaType":"text/csv","title":"CSV"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://opendata.dc.gov/api/download/v1/items/10f4f09fc5684d9988ae83ae4cca8b70/filegdb?layers=75","format":"ZIP","mediaType":"application/zip","title":"File Geodatabase"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://opendata.dc.gov/api/download/v1/items/10f4f09fc5684d9988ae83ae4cca8b70/geojson?layers=75","format":"GeoJSON","mediaType":"application/vnd.geo+json","title":"GeoJSON"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://opendata.dc.gov/api/download/v1/items/10f4f09fc5684d9988ae83ae4cca8b70/kml?layers=75","format":"KML","mediaType":"application/vnd.google-earth.kml+xml","title":"KML"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://opendata.dc.gov/api/download/v1/items/10f4f09fc5684d9988ae83ae4cca8b70/shapefile?layers=75","format":"ZIP","mediaType":"application/zip","title":"Shapefile"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://opendata.dc.gov/datasets/DCGIS::building-energy-performance","format":"Web Page","mediaType":"text/html","title":"ArcGIS Hub Dataset"}],"identifier":"https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=10f4f09fc5684d9988ae83ae4cca8b70&sublayer=75","issued":"2021-05-04T18:20:52.000Z","keyword":["DOEE","District of Columbia","Washington DC","buildings","energy","facility and structure","performance","planning","property and land"],"landingPage":"https://opendata.dc.gov/datasets/DCGIS::building-energy-performance","license":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0","modified":"2026-09-28T22:02:19.000Z","publisher":{"name":"City of Washington, DC"},"spatial":"-77.1099,38.8133,-76.9167,38.9857","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Building Energy Performance"},"description":"<div style=\"text-align:Left;\"><div><div><p><span>The BEPS Program was created by Title III of the?Clean Energy DC Omnibus Act of 2018. The BEPS is a minimum threshold of energy performance that will be no lower than the local median?ENERGY STAR?score by property type (or equivalent metric). The standards were created to drive energy performance in existing buildings to help meet the energy and climate goals of the?Sustainable DC?plan \u2014 to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption by 50% by 2032. DOEE established the first set of Standards on January 1, 2021. Standards will then be set every 6 years, creating BEPS Periods (BEPS Period 1, BEPS Period 2, etc.). The 2021 Building Energy Performance Standards and a Guide to the 2021 BEPS are available for viewing on DOEE\u2019s website.</span></p><p><span>To improve transparency and help building owners understand how their building performs relative to the BEPS, DOEE is publishing this BEPS Disclosure that compares a building\u2019s benchmarking data with the BEPS and provides an estimate of the building\u2019s distance from the standard and estimated performance requirement.</span></p><p><span>Please note that this dataset is based on information currently available to DOEE using calendar year 2019 benchmarking data provided by the building owner. Some buildings are still being evaluated and therefore have been designated as \u201cUnder Review\u201d in this dataset. Building owners that believe their 2019 calendar year data is incorrect should contact the Benchmarking Help Center (info.benchmark@dc.gov). Additionally, buildings that meet certain criteria may request a variance from the standards by submitting a variance request form on the DOEE website.</span></p></div></div></div>","distribution_titles":["ArcGIS GeoService","CSV","File Geodatabase","GeoJSON","KML","Shapefile","ArcGIS Hub Dataset"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/2ceefe2f-b84b-4dc7-9f6a-dbf5873f3787","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/2ceefe2f-b84b-4dc7-9f6a-dbf5873f3787/raw","has_download":false,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=10f4f09fc5684d9988ae83ae4cca8b70&sublayer=75","keyword":["DOEE","District of Columbia","Washington DC","buildings","energy","facility and structure","performance","planning","property and land"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-29T21:56:55.222488","organization":{"aliases":["dc"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"f2d0ab92-6e70-41ac-b5fd-305d70fbb37f","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/dc.png","name":"District of Columbia","organization_type":"City Government","slug":"district-of-columbia"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":9,"publisher":"City of Washington, DC","slug":"building-energy-performance","spatial_centroid":{"lat":38.882259999999995,"lon":-77.03262},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-77.1099,38.8133],[-77.1099,38.9857],[-76.9167,38.9857],[-76.9167,38.8133],[-77.1099,38.8133]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Building Energy Performance","type":"dataset"},{"_score":16.830238,"_sort":[1790716967608,16.830238,0,"b2ec759a-d36c-4a8a-8737-6ad81de3c29f"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:24"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"NPS IRMA Help","hasEmail":"mailto:NRSS_DataStore@nps.gov"},"description":"The Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) is the zone of transition between unoccupied land and human development. The WUI is often characterized as having increased risk of wildfire due to increasing population, dangerous fuel buildup, and climate change.\n\n\nWhile the WUI can be defined in various ways depending on spatial scale, Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks defines its WUI by a half-mile buffer around park roads and buildings.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://services1.arcgis.com/fBc8EJBxQRMcHlei/arcgis/rest/services/SEKI_Wildland_Urban_Interface/FeatureServer","format":"API","title":"Feature Service"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/NPS_DataStore_2320484","issued":"2013-03-19T00:00:00Z","keyword":["development","fire","fire risk","wildland fire","wildland urban interface","wui"],"landingPage":"https://irma.nps.gov/DataStore/Reference/Profile/2320484","modified":"2013-03-19T00:00:00Z","programCode":["010:118","010:119"],"publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"National Park Service"},"spatial":"-118.983223,36.29138,-118.234779,37.2376175","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Paks Wildland Urban Interface (WUI)"},"description":"The Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) is the zone of transition between unoccupied land and human development. The WUI is often characterized as having increased risk of wildfire due to increasing population, dangerous fuel buildup, and climate change.\n\n\nWhile the WUI can be defined in various ways depending on spatial scale, Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks defines its WUI by a half-mile buffer around park roads and buildings.","distribution_titles":["Feature Service"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/a1954b2b-a137-4ae6-a94a-95ffb723d622","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/a1954b2b-a137-4ae6-a94a-95ffb723d622/raw","has_download":false,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/NPS_DataStore_2320484","keyword":["development","fire","fire risk","wildland fire","wildland urban interface","wui"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-29T21:22:47.608974","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"National Park Service","slug":"sequoia-and-kings-canyon-national-paks-wildland-urban-interface-wui","spatial_centroid":{"lat":36.669875,"lon":-118.6838454},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-118.983223,36.29138],[-118.983223,37.2376175],[-118.234779,37.2376175],[-118.234779,36.29138],[-118.983223,36.29138]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Paks Wildland Urban Interface (WUI)","type":"dataset"},{"_score":16.12415,"_sort":[1790627147421,16.12415,0,"2a97fdb4-c319-49c1-8ff4-bbbd67a56189"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"@type":"Dataset","accessRights":"public","contactPoint":[{"@type":"Kind","fn":"Office of Data Science Strategy (ODSS)","hasEmail":"mailto:ODSSInfo@mail.nih.gov"}],"description":"The National Neighborhood Data Archive (NaNDA) is a publicly available data archive containing contextual measures for locations across the United States. NaNDA offers theoretically derived, spatially referenced, nationwide measures of the physical and social environment. Each NaNDA dataset represents a set of measures on a single topic of interest. Examples of topics to be found in NaNDA (now or in the future) include socioeconomic disadvantage and affluence, walkability, crime, land use, recreational centers, libraries, fast food, climate, healthcare, housing, public transit, and more.","distribution":[{"@type":"Distribution","accessURL":"https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/sites/icpsr/find-data"}],"identifier":"https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/series/1920","inventoried":"2026-09-27","keyword":["Behavioral and social sciences"],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)","subOrganizationOf":[{"@type":"Organization","name":"National Institutes of Health (NIH)","subOrganizationOf":[{"@type":"Organization","name":"U.S. Department of Health and Human Services"}]}]},"theme":[{"@type":"Concept","prefLabel":"human"}],"title":"National Neighborhood Data Archive (NaNDA)"},"description":"The National Neighborhood Data Archive (NaNDA) is a publicly available data archive containing contextual measures for locations across the United States. NaNDA offers theoretically derived, spatially referenced, nationwide measures of the physical and social environment. Each NaNDA dataset represents a set of measures on a single topic of interest. Examples of topics to be found in NaNDA (now or in the future) include socioeconomic disadvantage and affluence, walkability, crime, land use, recreational centers, libraries, fast food, climate, healthcare, housing, public transit, and more.","distribution_titles":[],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/000057b6-c82b-45af-8e9d-a341ad068e21","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/000057b6-c82b-45af-8e9d-a341ad068e21/raw","has_download":false,"has_spatial":false,"identifier":"https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/series/1920","keyword":["Behavioral and social sciences"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-28T20:25:47.421539","organization":{"aliases":["US","dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"2c2fc21f-21d0-4450-af01-cf8c69b44156","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/hhs.png","name":"U.S. Department of Health & Human Services","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"hhs"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)","slug":"national-neighborhood-data-archive-nanda","spatial_centroid":null,"spatial_shape":null,"theme":["human"],"title":"National Neighborhood Data Archive (NaNDA)","type":"dataset"},{"_score":11.90193,"_sort":[1790626214864,11.90193,0,"4bea04d4-95b3-4714-a356-3f9d4e7f8e01"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"@type":"Dataset","accessLevel":"public","accessRights":"public","bureauCode":["009:20"],"contactPoint":[{"@type":"Kind","fn":"Craig Kassinger","hasEmail":"mailto:nephtrackingsupport@cdc.gov"}],"description":"This dataset provides data at the county level for the contiguous United States. It includes monthly Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) data from 1895-2016 provided by the Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites - North Carolina. Please refer to the metadata attachment for more information.\r\n\r\nLearn more about drought on the Tracking Network's website: https://ephtracking.cdc.gov/showDroughtLanding.\r\n\r\nBy using these data, you signify your agreement to comply with the following requirements: \r\n1.\tUse the data for statistical reporting and analysis only. \r\n2.\tDo not attempt to learn the identity of any person included in the data and do not combine these data with other data for the purpose of matching records to identify individuals. \r\n3.\tDo not disclose of or make use of the identity of any person or establishment discovered inadvertently and report the discovery to: trackingsupport@cdc.gov. \r\n4.\tDo not imply or state, either in written or oral form, that interpretations based on the data are those of the original data sources and CDC unless the data user and data source are formally collaborating. \r\n5.\tAcknowledge, in all reports or presentations based on these data, the original source of the data and CDC. \r\n6.\tSuggested citation: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network. Web. Accessed: insert date. www.cdc.gov/ephtracking. \r\n\r\nProblems or Questions? \r\nEmail trackingsupport@cdc.gov.","distribution":[{"@type":"Distribution","accessURL":"https://data.cdc.gov/d/xbk2-5i4e","describedBy":"{\"@type\": \"Standard\", \"accessURL\": \"https://data.cdc.gov/api/views/xbk2-5i4e/columns.json\", \"title\": \"Columns for this asset\"}","downloadURL":"https://data.cdc.gov/api/v3/views/xbk2-5i4e/query.json?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"application/json","modified":"2026-09-10"},{"@type":"Distribution","accessURL":"https://data.cdc.gov/d/xbk2-5i4e","describedBy":"{\"@type\": \"Standard\", \"accessURL\": \"https://data.cdc.gov/api/views/xbk2-5i4e/columns.xml\", \"title\": \"Columns for this asset\"}","downloadURL":"https://data.cdc.gov/api/v3/views/xbk2-5i4e/query.xml?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"application/xml","modified":"2026-09-10"},{"@type":"Distribution","accessURL":"https://data.cdc.gov/d/xbk2-5i4e","downloadURL":"https://data.cdc.gov/api/v3/views/xbk2-5i4e/export.csv?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"text/csv","modified":"2026-09-10"}],"identifier":"https://data.cdc.gov/api/views/xbk2-5i4e","inventoried":"2026-09-27","keyword":["drought","environmental health"],"landingPage":{"@type":"Document","accessURL":"https://data.cdc.gov/d/xbk2-5i4e","description":"Standardized Precipitation Index, 1895-2016 - Dataset Home","issued":"2018-07-26","publisher":"[{\"@id\": \"https://data.cdc.gov/user/985s-3b5v\", \"@type\": \"Organization\", \"name\": \"ynz9\"}]","title":"Standardized Precipitation Index, 1895-2016 - Dataset Home"},"modified":"2026-09-10","programCode":["009:032"],"publisher":{"@id":"https://data.cdc.gov/user/985s-3b5v","@type":"Organization","name":"ynz9"},"title":"Standardized Precipitation Index, 1895-2016"},"description":"This dataset provides data at the county level for the contiguous United States. It includes monthly Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) data from 1895-2016 provided by the Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites - North Carolina. Please refer to the metadata attachment for more information.\r\n\r\nLearn more about drought on the Tracking Network's website: https://ephtracking.cdc.gov/showDroughtLanding.\r\n\r\nBy using these data, you signify your agreement to comply with the following requirements: \r\n1.\tUse the data for statistical reporting and analysis only. \r\n2.\tDo not attempt to learn the identity of any person included in the data and do not combine these data with other data for the purpose of matching records to identify individuals. \r\n3.\tDo not disclose of or make use of the identity of any person or establishment discovered inadvertently and report the discovery to: trackingsupport@cdc.gov. \r\n4.\tDo not imply or state, either in written or oral form, that interpretations based on the data are those of the original data sources and CDC unless the data user and data source are formally collaborating. \r\n5.\tAcknowledge, in all reports or presentations based on these data, the original source of the data and CDC. \r\n6.\tSuggested citation: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network. Web. Accessed: insert date. www.cdc.gov/ephtracking. \r\n\r\nProblems or Questions? \r\nEmail trackingsupport@cdc.gov.","distribution_titles":[],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/f17db3f3-a0a7-49e3-9588-a27b0f9c82e2","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/f17db3f3-a0a7-49e3-9588-a27b0f9c82e2/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":false,"identifier":"https://data.cdc.gov/api/views/xbk2-5i4e","keyword":["drought","environmental health"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-28T20:10:14.864873","organization":{"aliases":["US","dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"2c2fc21f-21d0-4450-af01-cf8c69b44156","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/hhs.png","name":"U.S. Department of Health & Human Services","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"hhs"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"ynz9","slug":"standardized-precipitation-index-1895-2016-66000","spatial_centroid":null,"spatial_shape":null,"theme":[],"title":"Standardized Precipitation Index, 1895-2016","type":"dataset"},{"_score":11.633816,"_sort":[1790626177254,11.633816,0,"9ba67666-f4e2-413a-98be-194135780418"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"@type":"Dataset","accessLevel":"public","accessRights":"public","bureauCode":["009:20"],"contactPoint":[{"@type":"Kind","fn":"Craig Kassinger","hasEmail":"mailto:nephtrackingsupport@cdc.gov"}],"description":"This dataset provides data at the county level for the contiguous United States. It includes weekly United States Drought Monitor (USDM) data from 2000-2016 provided by the Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites - North Carolina. Please refer to the metadata attachment for more information.\r\n\r\nThese data are used by the CDC's National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network to generate drought measures. Learn more about drought on the Tracking Network's website: https://ephtracking.cdc.gov/showDroughtLanding.\r\n\r\nBy using these data, you signify your agreement to comply with the following requirements: \r\n1.\tUse the data for statistical reporting and analysis only. \r\n2.\tDo not attempt to learn the identity of any person included in the data and do not combine these data with other data for the purpose of matching records to identify individuals. \r\n3.\tDo not disclose of or make use of the identity of any person or establishment discovered inadvertently and report the discovery to: trackingsupport@cdc.gov. \r\n4.\tDo not imply or state, either in written or oral form, that interpretations based on the data are those of the original data sources and CDC unless the data user and data source are formally collaborating. \r\n5.\tAcknowledge, in all reports or presentations based on these data, the original source of the data and CDC. \r\n6.\tSuggested citation: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network. Web. Accessed: insert date. www.cdc.gov/ephtracking. \r\n\r\nProblems or Questions? \r\nEmail trackingsupport@cdc.gov.","distribution":[{"@type":"Distribution","accessURL":"https://data.cdc.gov/d/spsk-9jj6","describedBy":"{\"@type\": \"Standard\", \"accessURL\": \"https://data.cdc.gov/api/views/spsk-9jj6/columns.json\", \"title\": \"Columns for this asset\"}","downloadURL":"https://data.cdc.gov/api/v3/views/spsk-9jj6/query.json?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"application/json","modified":"2026-09-09"},{"@type":"Distribution","accessURL":"https://data.cdc.gov/d/spsk-9jj6","describedBy":"{\"@type\": \"Standard\", \"accessURL\": \"https://data.cdc.gov/api/views/spsk-9jj6/columns.xml\", \"title\": \"Columns for this asset\"}","downloadURL":"https://data.cdc.gov/api/v3/views/spsk-9jj6/query.xml?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"application/xml","modified":"2026-09-09"},{"@type":"Distribution","accessURL":"https://data.cdc.gov/d/spsk-9jj6","downloadURL":"https://data.cdc.gov/api/v3/views/spsk-9jj6/export.csv?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"text/csv","modified":"2026-09-09"}],"identifier":"https://data.cdc.gov/api/views/spsk-9jj6","inventoried":"2026-09-27","keyword":["drought","environmental health"],"landingPage":{"@type":"Document","accessURL":"https://data.cdc.gov/d/spsk-9jj6","description":"United States Drought Monitor, 2000-2016 - Dataset Home","issued":"2018-08-08","publisher":"[{\"@id\": \"https://data.cdc.gov/user/985s-3b5v\", \"@type\": \"Organization\", \"name\": \"ynz9\"}]","title":"United States Drought Monitor, 2000-2016 - Dataset Home"},"modified":"2026-09-09","programCode":["009:032"],"publisher":{"@id":"https://data.cdc.gov/user/985s-3b5v","@type":"Organization","name":"ynz9"},"title":"United States Drought Monitor, 2000-2016"},"description":"This dataset provides data at the county level for the contiguous United States. It includes weekly United States Drought Monitor (USDM) data from 2000-2016 provided by the Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites - North Carolina. Please refer to the metadata attachment for more information.\r\n\r\nThese data are used by the CDC's National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network to generate drought measures. Learn more about drought on the Tracking Network's website: https://ephtracking.cdc.gov/showDroughtLanding.\r\n\r\nBy using these data, you signify your agreement to comply with the following requirements: \r\n1.\tUse the data for statistical reporting and analysis only. \r\n2.\tDo not attempt to learn the identity of any person included in the data and do not combine these data with other data for the purpose of matching records to identify individuals. \r\n3.\tDo not disclose of or make use of the identity of any person or establishment discovered inadvertently and report the discovery to: trackingsupport@cdc.gov. \r\n4.\tDo not imply or state, either in written or oral form, that interpretations based on the data are those of the original data sources and CDC unless the data user and data source are formally collaborating. \r\n5.\tAcknowledge, in all reports or presentations based on these data, the original source of the data and CDC. \r\n6.\tSuggested citation: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network. Web. Accessed: insert date. www.cdc.gov/ephtracking. \r\n\r\nProblems or Questions? \r\nEmail trackingsupport@cdc.gov.","distribution_titles":[],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/a504ee2e-25c4-4947-88a8-02e46ac76487","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/a504ee2e-25c4-4947-88a8-02e46ac76487/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":false,"identifier":"https://data.cdc.gov/api/views/spsk-9jj6","keyword":["drought","environmental health"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-28T20:09:37.254555","organization":{"aliases":["US","dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"2c2fc21f-21d0-4450-af01-cf8c69b44156","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/hhs.png","name":"U.S. Department of Health & Human Services","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"hhs"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"ynz9","slug":"united-states-drought-monitor-2000-2016-940a8","spatial_centroid":null,"spatial_shape":null,"theme":[],"title":"United States Drought Monitor, 2000-2016","type":"dataset"},{"_score":11.89731,"_sort":[1790626069263,11.89731,0,"aa65ddf0-6c74-47ab-9a12-3945c9347a5d"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"@type":"Dataset","accessLevel":"public","accessRights":"public","bureauCode":["009:20"],"contactPoint":[{"@type":"Kind","fn":"Craig Kassinger","hasEmail":"mailto:nephtrackingsupport@cdc.gov"}],"description":"This dataset provides data at the county level for the contiguous United States. It includes monthly Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) data from 1895-2016 provided by the Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites - North Carolina. Please refer to the metadata attachment for more information.\r\n\r\nLearn more about drought on the Tracking Network's website: https://ephtracking.cdc.gov/showDroughtLanding.\r\n\r\nBy using these data, you signify your agreement to comply with the following requirements: \r\n1.\tUse the data for statistical reporting and analysis only. \r\n2.\tDo not attempt to learn the identity of any person included in the data and do not combine these data with other data for the purpose of matching records to identify individuals. \r\n3.\tDo not disclose of or make use of the identity of any person or establishment discovered inadvertently and report the discovery to: trackingsupport@cdc.gov. \r\n4.\tDo not imply or state, either in written or oral form, that interpretations based on the data are those of the original data sources and CDC unless the data user and data source are formally collaborating. \r\n5.\tAcknowledge, in all reports or presentations based on these data, the original source of the data and CDC. \r\n6.\tSuggested citation: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network. Web. Accessed: insert date. www.cdc.gov/ephtracking. \r\n\r\nProblems or Questions? \r\nEmail trackingsupport@cdc.gov.","distribution":[{"@type":"Distribution","accessURL":"https://data.cdc.gov/d/en5r-5ds4","describedBy":"{\"@type\": \"Standard\", \"accessURL\": \"https://data.cdc.gov/api/views/en5r-5ds4/columns.json\", \"title\": \"Columns for this asset\"}","downloadURL":"https://data.cdc.gov/api/v3/views/en5r-5ds4/query.json?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"application/json","modified":"2026-09-10"},{"@type":"Distribution","accessURL":"https://data.cdc.gov/d/en5r-5ds4","describedBy":"{\"@type\": \"Standard\", \"accessURL\": \"https://data.cdc.gov/api/views/en5r-5ds4/columns.xml\", \"title\": \"Columns for this asset\"}","downloadURL":"https://data.cdc.gov/api/v3/views/en5r-5ds4/query.xml?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"application/xml","modified":"2026-09-10"},{"@type":"Distribution","accessURL":"https://data.cdc.gov/d/en5r-5ds4","downloadURL":"https://data.cdc.gov/api/v3/views/en5r-5ds4/export.csv?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"text/csv","modified":"2026-09-10"}],"identifier":"https://data.cdc.gov/api/views/en5r-5ds4","inventoried":"2026-09-27","keyword":["drought","environmental health"],"landingPage":{"@type":"Document","accessURL":"https://data.cdc.gov/d/en5r-5ds4","description":"Palmer Drought Severity Index, 1895-2016 - Dataset Home","issued":"2018-07-26","publisher":"[{\"@id\": \"https://data.cdc.gov/user/985s-3b5v\", \"@type\": \"Organization\", \"name\": \"ynz9\"}]","title":"Palmer Drought Severity Index, 1895-2016 - Dataset Home"},"modified":"2026-09-10","programCode":["009:032"],"publisher":{"@id":"https://data.cdc.gov/user/985s-3b5v","@type":"Organization","name":"ynz9"},"title":"Palmer Drought Severity Index, 1895-2016"},"description":"This dataset provides data at the county level for the contiguous United States. It includes monthly Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) data from 1895-2016 provided by the Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites - North Carolina. Please refer to the metadata attachment for more information.\r\n\r\nLearn more about drought on the Tracking Network's website: https://ephtracking.cdc.gov/showDroughtLanding.\r\n\r\nBy using these data, you signify your agreement to comply with the following requirements: \r\n1.\tUse the data for statistical reporting and analysis only. \r\n2.\tDo not attempt to learn the identity of any person included in the data and do not combine these data with other data for the purpose of matching records to identify individuals. \r\n3.\tDo not disclose of or make use of the identity of any person or establishment discovered inadvertently and report the discovery to: trackingsupport@cdc.gov. \r\n4.\tDo not imply or state, either in written or oral form, that interpretations based on the data are those of the original data sources and CDC unless the data user and data source are formally collaborating. \r\n5.\tAcknowledge, in all reports or presentations based on these data, the original source of the data and CDC. \r\n6.\tSuggested citation: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network. Web. Accessed: insert date. www.cdc.gov/ephtracking. \r\n\r\nProblems or Questions? \r\nEmail trackingsupport@cdc.gov.","distribution_titles":[],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/422d8f4f-cfe8-40e7-846e-a70d38be5ee4","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/422d8f4f-cfe8-40e7-846e-a70d38be5ee4/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":false,"identifier":"https://data.cdc.gov/api/views/en5r-5ds4","keyword":["drought","environmental health"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-28T20:07:49.263891","organization":{"aliases":["US","dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"2c2fc21f-21d0-4450-af01-cf8c69b44156","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/hhs.png","name":"U.S. Department of Health & Human Services","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"hhs"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"ynz9","slug":"palmer-drought-severity-index-1895-2016-73abb","spatial_centroid":null,"spatial_shape":null,"theme":[],"title":"Palmer Drought Severity Index, 1895-2016","type":"dataset"},{"_score":11.526215,"_sort":[1790625991368,11.526215,0,"195b09f9-9b1c-4cb2-a6b9-ee0ddbfa35ca"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"@type":"Dataset","accessLevel":"public","accessRights":"public","bureauCode":["009:20"],"contactPoint":[{"@type":"Kind","fn":"Craig Kassinger","hasEmail":"mailto:nephtrackingsupport@cdc.gov"}],"description":"This dataset provides data at the county level for the contiguous United States. It includes monthly Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI)  data from 1895-2016 provided by the Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites - North Carolina. Please refer to the metadata attachment for more information.\r\n\r\nThese data are used by the CDC's National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network to generate drought measures. Learn more about drought on the Tracking Network's website: https://ephtracking.cdc.gov/showDroughtLanding.\r\n\r\nBy using these data, you signify your agreement to comply with the following requirements: \r\n1.\tUse the data for statistical reporting and analysis only. \r\n2.\tDo not attempt to learn the identity of any person included in the data and do not combine these data with other data for the purpose of matching records to identify individuals. \r\n3.\tDo not disclose of or make use of the identity of any person or establishment discovered inadvertently and report the discovery to: trackingsupport@cdc.gov. \r\n4.\tDo not imply or state, either in written or oral form, that interpretations based on the data are those of the original data sources and CDC unless the data user and data source are formally collaborating. \r\n5.\tAcknowledge, in all reports or presentations based on these data, the original source of the data and CDC. \r\n6.\tSuggested citation: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network. Web. Accessed: insert date. www.cdc.gov/ephtracking. \r\n\r\nProblems or Questions? \r\nEmail trackingsupport@cdc.gov.","distribution":[{"@type":"Distribution","accessURL":"https://data.cdc.gov/d/6nbv-ifib","describedBy":"{\"@type\": \"Standard\", \"accessURL\": \"https://data.cdc.gov/api/views/6nbv-ifib/columns.json\", \"title\": \"Columns for this asset\"}","downloadURL":"https://data.cdc.gov/api/v3/views/6nbv-ifib/query.json?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"application/json","modified":"2026-09-10"},{"@type":"Distribution","accessURL":"https://data.cdc.gov/d/6nbv-ifib","describedBy":"{\"@type\": \"Standard\", \"accessURL\": \"https://data.cdc.gov/api/views/6nbv-ifib/columns.xml\", \"title\": \"Columns for this asset\"}","downloadURL":"https://data.cdc.gov/api/v3/views/6nbv-ifib/query.xml?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"application/xml","modified":"2026-09-10"},{"@type":"Distribution","accessURL":"https://data.cdc.gov/d/6nbv-ifib","downloadURL":"https://data.cdc.gov/api/v3/views/6nbv-ifib/export.csv?accessType=DOWNLOAD","mediaType":"text/csv","modified":"2026-09-10"}],"identifier":"https://data.cdc.gov/api/views/6nbv-ifib","inventoried":"2026-09-27","keyword":["drought","environmental health"],"landingPage":{"@type":"Document","accessURL":"https://data.cdc.gov/d/6nbv-ifib","description":"Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index, 1895-2016 - Dataset Home","issued":"2018-07-26","publisher":"[{\"@id\": \"https://data.cdc.gov/user/985s-3b5v\", \"@type\": \"Organization\", \"name\": \"ynz9\"}]","title":"Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index, 1895-2016 - Dataset Home"},"modified":"2026-09-10","programCode":["009:032"],"publisher":{"@id":"https://data.cdc.gov/user/985s-3b5v","@type":"Organization","name":"ynz9"},"title":"Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index, 1895-2016"},"description":"This dataset provides data at the county level for the contiguous United States. It includes monthly Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI)  data from 1895-2016 provided by the Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites - North Carolina. Please refer to the metadata attachment for more information.\r\n\r\nThese data are used by the CDC's National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network to generate drought measures. Learn more about drought on the Tracking Network's website: https://ephtracking.cdc.gov/showDroughtLanding.\r\n\r\nBy using these data, you signify your agreement to comply with the following requirements: \r\n1.\tUse the data for statistical reporting and analysis only. \r\n2.\tDo not attempt to learn the identity of any person included in the data and do not combine these data with other data for the purpose of matching records to identify individuals. \r\n3.\tDo not disclose of or make use of the identity of any person or establishment discovered inadvertently and report the discovery to: trackingsupport@cdc.gov. \r\n4.\tDo not imply or state, either in written or oral form, that interpretations based on the data are those of the original data sources and CDC unless the data user and data source are formally collaborating. \r\n5.\tAcknowledge, in all reports or presentations based on these data, the original source of the data and CDC. \r\n6.\tSuggested citation: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network. Web. Accessed: insert date. www.cdc.gov/ephtracking. \r\n\r\nProblems or Questions? \r\nEmail trackingsupport@cdc.gov.","distribution_titles":[],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/f0397276-5fd1-4d7f-8fec-a38d94f9412d","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/f0397276-5fd1-4d7f-8fec-a38d94f9412d/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":false,"identifier":"https://data.cdc.gov/api/views/6nbv-ifib","keyword":["drought","environmental health"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-28T20:06:31.368773","organization":{"aliases":["US","dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"2c2fc21f-21d0-4450-af01-cf8c69b44156","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/hhs.png","name":"U.S. Department of Health & Human Services","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"hhs"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"ynz9","slug":"standardized-precipitation-evapotranspiration-index-1895-2016-4459f","spatial_centroid":null,"spatial_shape":null,"theme":[],"title":"Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index, 1895-2016","type":"dataset"},{"_score":7.3345623,"_sort":[1790625807855,7.3345623,0,"b5d2a808-de12-45de-bcee-2696e0e118de"],"access_level":"restricted public","dcat":{"@type":"Dataset","accessRights":"restricted public","contactPoint":[{"@type":"Kind","fn":"OPRE Hub","hasEmail":"mailto:OPREhub@acf.hhs.gov"}],"description":"The second National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being (NSCAW II) is a longitudinal study intended to answer a range of fundamental questions about the well-being, functioning, service needs, and service use of children who come in contact with the child welfare system. The study is sponsored by the Administration for Children and Families (ACF), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). It examines the well-being of children involved with child welfare agencies; captures information about their families; provides information about child welfare interventions and other services; and describes key characteristics of child development. Of particular interest to the study are children's health, mental health, and developmental risks, especially for those children who experienced the most severe abuse and exposure to violence. The NSCAW II study design essentially mirrors that of NSCAW I. The NSCAW II cohort includes 5,872 children, aged birth to 17.5 years old, who had contact with the child welfare system within a 15-month period that began in February 2008. Children were sampled from investigations closed during the reference period. The cohort of 5,872 children was selected from 81 of the original NSCAW 92 Primary Sampling Units (PSUs) in 83 counties in 30 states that agreed to participate in NSCAW II. Retaining most of the NSCAW I PSUs allows researchers to assess the change in context from the late 1990s and enables longitudinal analysis of organizational measures such as staff turnover, climate, and work environment. The sample of investigated or assessed cases includes both cases that receive ongoing services and cases that are not receiving services, either because they were not substantiated or because it was determined that services were not required. The sample design, with oversampling of infants and children in out-of-home placement and undersampling of cases not receiving services to ensure appropriate representation among subgroups, allows in-depth analysis of subgroups of special interest (e.g., young children and adolescents in foster care) while providing national estimates for the full population of children and families entering the system. Like NSCAW I, NSCAW II is a longitudinal study with multiple informants associated with each sampled child to provide the fullest possible depiction of that child. Face-to-face interviews or assessments were conducted with children, parents, and nonparent adult caregivers (e.g., foster parents, kin caregivers, and group home caregivers), and investigative caseworkers. Baseline data collection began in March 2008 and was completed in September 2009. The second wave of the study, 18 months after the close of the NSCAW II index investigation, began in October 2009 and was completed in January 2011. At Wave 3, children and families were reinterviewed approximately 36 months after the close of the NSCAW II index investigation. The NSCAW II cohort of children who were approximately 2 months to 17.5 years old at baseline ranged in age from 34 months to 20 years old at Wave 3. Data collection for the third wave of the study began in June 2011 and was completed in December 2012. NDACAN's dedicated NSCAW User Support page contains a video and several documents to assist researchers with these data.","distribution":[{"@type":"Distribution","accessURL":"https://www.ndacan.acf.hhs.gov/datasets/dataset-details.cfm?ID=172"}],"identifier":"acf-opre-0122","inventoried":"2026-09-27","keyword":["child welfare","family support services"],"landingPage":{"@type":"Document","accessURL":"https://www.ndacan.acf.hhs.gov/datasets/datasets-list-nscaw.cfm","title":"The National Survey on Child and Adolescent Well-Being II (NSCAW II) Restricted Release, Waves 1-3 - Landing Page"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Office of Planning, Research & Evaluation (OPRE)","subOrganizationOf":[{"@type":"Organization","name":"Administration for Children and Families (ACF)"}]},"spatial":"[{\"@type\": \"Location\", \"prefLabel\": \"united states\"}]","theme":[{"@type":"Concept","prefLabel":"human services"}],"title":"The National Survey on Child and Adolescent Well-Being II (NSCAW II) Restricted Release, Waves 1-3"},"description":"The second National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being (NSCAW II) is a longitudinal study intended to answer a range of fundamental questions about the well-being, functioning, service needs, and service use of children who come in contact with the child welfare system. The study is sponsored by the Administration for Children and Families (ACF), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). It examines the well-being of children involved with child welfare agencies; captures information about their families; provides information about child welfare interventions and other services; and describes key characteristics of child development. Of particular interest to the study are children's health, mental health, and developmental risks, especially for those children who experienced the most severe abuse and exposure to violence. The NSCAW II study design essentially mirrors that of NSCAW I. The NSCAW II cohort includes 5,872 children, aged birth to 17.5 years old, who had contact with the child welfare system within a 15-month period that began in February 2008. Children were sampled from investigations closed during the reference period. The cohort of 5,872 children was selected from 81 of the original NSCAW 92 Primary Sampling Units (PSUs) in 83 counties in 30 states that agreed to participate in NSCAW II. Retaining most of the NSCAW I PSUs allows researchers to assess the change in context from the late 1990s and enables longitudinal analysis of organizational measures such as staff turnover, climate, and work environment. The sample of investigated or assessed cases includes both cases that receive ongoing services and cases that are not receiving services, either because they were not substantiated or because it was determined that services were not required. The sample design, with oversampling of infants and children in out-of-home placement and undersampling of cases not receiving services to ensure appropriate representation among subgroups, allows in-depth analysis of subgroups of special interest (e.g., young children and adolescents in foster care) while providing national estimates for the full population of children and families entering the system. Like NSCAW I, NSCAW II is a longitudinal study with multiple informants associated with each sampled child to provide the fullest possible depiction of that child. Face-to-face interviews or assessments were conducted with children, parents, and nonparent adult caregivers (e.g., foster parents, kin caregivers, and group home caregivers), and investigative caseworkers. Baseline data collection began in March 2008 and was completed in September 2009. The second wave of the study, 18 months after the close of the NSCAW II index investigation, began in October 2009 and was completed in January 2011. At Wave 3, children and families were reinterviewed approximately 36 months after the close of the NSCAW II index investigation. The NSCAW II cohort of children who were approximately 2 months to 17.5 years old at baseline ranged in age from 34 months to 20 years old at Wave 3. Data collection for the third wave of the study began in June 2011 and was completed in December 2012. NDACAN's dedicated NSCAW User Support page contains a video and several documents to assist researchers with these data.","distribution_titles":[],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/a6e2d00f-1bab-4510-a5e5-ff64a5258410","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/a6e2d00f-1bab-4510-a5e5-ff64a5258410/raw","has_download":false,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"acf-opre-0122","keyword":["child welfare","family support services"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-28T20:03:27.855643","organization":{"aliases":["US","dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"2c2fc21f-21d0-4450-af01-cf8c69b44156","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/hhs.png","name":"U.S. Department of Health & Human Services","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"hhs"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"Office of Planning, Research & Evaluation (OPRE)","slug":"the-national-survey-on-child-and-adolescent-well-being-ii-nscaw-ii-restricted-release-wave-3e129","spatial_centroid":{"lat":34.4819914,"lon":-101.6218762},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[[-124.733253,24.544245],[-124.733253,49.388611],[-66.954811,49.388611],[-66.954811,24.544245],[-124.733253,24.544245]]]],"type":"MultiPolygon"},"theme":["human services"],"title":"The National Survey on Child and Adolescent Well-Being II (NSCAW II) Restricted Release, Waves 1-3","type":"dataset"},{"_score":7.3576508,"_sort":[1790625807543,7.3576508,0,"5867b442-5645-45c0-a6bd-21d467fafb64"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"@type":"Dataset","accessRights":"public","contactPoint":[{"@type":"Kind","fn":"OPRE Hub","hasEmail":"mailto:OPREhub@acf.hhs.gov"}],"description":"The second National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being (NSCAW II) is a longitudinal study intended to answer a range of fundamental questions about the well-being, functioning, service needs, and service use of children who come in contact with the child welfare system. The study is sponsored by the Administration for Children and Families (ACF), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). It examines the well-being of children involved with child welfare agencies; captures information about their families; provides information about child welfare interventions and other services; and describes key characteristics of child development. Of particular interest to the study are children's health, mental health, and developmental risks, especially for those children who experienced the most severe abuse and exposure to violence. The NSCAW II study design essentially mirrors that of NSCAW I. The NSCAW II cohort includes 5,872 children, aged birth to 17.5 years old, who had contact with the child welfare system within a 15-month period that began in February 2008. Children were sampled from investigations closed during the reference period. The cohort of 5,872 children was selected from 81 of the original NSCAW 92 Primary Sampling Units (PSUs) in 83 counties in 30 states that agreed to participate in NSCAW II. Retaining most of the NSCAW I PSUs will allow researchers to assess the change in context from the late 1990s and enable longitudinal analysis of organizational measures such as staff turnover, climate, and work environment. The sample of investigated/assessed cases includes both cases that receive ongoing services and cases that are not receiving services, either because they were not substantiated or because it was determined that services were not required. The sample design\u2014with oversampling of infants and children in out-of-home placement and undersampling of cases not receiving services to ensure appropriate representation among subgroups\u2014allows in-depth analysis of subgroups of special interest (e.g., young children, adolescents in foster care) while providing national estimates for the full population of children and families entering the system. Like NSCAW I, NSCAW II is a longitudinal study with multiple informants associated with each sampled child to get the fullest possible depiction of that child. Face-to-face interviews or assessments were conducted with children, parents, and nonparent adult caregivers (e.g., foster parents, kin caregivers, and group home caregivers), and investigative caseworkers. Baseline data collection began in March 2008 and was completed in September 2009. The second wave of the study, 18 months after the close of the NSCAW II index investigation, began in October 2009 and was completed in January 2011. At Wave 3, children and families were reinterviewed approximately 36 months after the close of the NSCAW II index investigation. The NSCAW II cohort of children who were approximately 2 months to 17.5 years old at baseline ranged in age from 34 months to 20 years old at Wave 3. Data collection for the third wave of the study began in June 2011 and was completed in December 2012.","distribution":[{"@type":"Distribution","accessURL":"https://www.ndacan.acf.hhs.gov/datasets/dataset-details.cfm?ID=173"}],"identifier":"acf-opre-0121","inventoried":"2026-09-27","keyword":["child welfare","family support services"],"landingPage":{"@type":"Document","accessURL":"https://www.ndacan.acf.hhs.gov/datasets/datasets-list-nscaw.cfm","title":"The National Survey on Child and Adolescent Well-Being II (NSCAW II) General Release, Waves 1-3 - Landing Page"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Office of Planning, Research & Evaluation (OPRE)","subOrganizationOf":[{"@type":"Organization","name":"Administration for Children and Families (ACF)"}]},"spatial":"[{\"@type\": \"Location\", \"prefLabel\": \"united states\"}]","theme":[{"@type":"Concept","prefLabel":"human services"}],"title":"The National Survey on Child and Adolescent Well-Being II (NSCAW II) General Release, Waves 1-3"},"description":"The second National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being (NSCAW II) is a longitudinal study intended to answer a range of fundamental questions about the well-being, functioning, service needs, and service use of children who come in contact with the child welfare system. The study is sponsored by the Administration for Children and Families (ACF), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). It examines the well-being of children involved with child welfare agencies; captures information about their families; provides information about child welfare interventions and other services; and describes key characteristics of child development. Of particular interest to the study are children's health, mental health, and developmental risks, especially for those children who experienced the most severe abuse and exposure to violence. The NSCAW II study design essentially mirrors that of NSCAW I. The NSCAW II cohort includes 5,872 children, aged birth to 17.5 years old, who had contact with the child welfare system within a 15-month period that began in February 2008. Children were sampled from investigations closed during the reference period. The cohort of 5,872 children was selected from 81 of the original NSCAW 92 Primary Sampling Units (PSUs) in 83 counties in 30 states that agreed to participate in NSCAW II. Retaining most of the NSCAW I PSUs will allow researchers to assess the change in context from the late 1990s and enable longitudinal analysis of organizational measures such as staff turnover, climate, and work environment. The sample of investigated/assessed cases includes both cases that receive ongoing services and cases that are not receiving services, either because they were not substantiated or because it was determined that services were not required. The sample design\u2014with oversampling of infants and children in out-of-home placement and undersampling of cases not receiving services to ensure appropriate representation among subgroups\u2014allows in-depth analysis of subgroups of special interest (e.g., young children, adolescents in foster care) while providing national estimates for the full population of children and families entering the system. Like NSCAW I, NSCAW II is a longitudinal study with multiple informants associated with each sampled child to get the fullest possible depiction of that child. Face-to-face interviews or assessments were conducted with children, parents, and nonparent adult caregivers (e.g., foster parents, kin caregivers, and group home caregivers), and investigative caseworkers. Baseline data collection began in March 2008 and was completed in September 2009. The second wave of the study, 18 months after the close of the NSCAW II index investigation, began in October 2009 and was completed in January 2011. At Wave 3, children and families were reinterviewed approximately 36 months after the close of the NSCAW II index investigation. The NSCAW II cohort of children who were approximately 2 months to 17.5 years old at baseline ranged in age from 34 months to 20 years old at Wave 3. Data collection for the third wave of the study began in June 2011 and was completed in December 2012.","distribution_titles":[],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/699cc39c-ffa0-4c4d-9249-f2fdaef7cab0","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/699cc39c-ffa0-4c4d-9249-f2fdaef7cab0/raw","has_download":false,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"acf-opre-0121","keyword":["child welfare","family support services"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-28T20:03:27.543313","organization":{"aliases":["US","dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"2c2fc21f-21d0-4450-af01-cf8c69b44156","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/hhs.png","name":"U.S. Department of Health & Human Services","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"hhs"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"Office of Planning, Research & Evaluation (OPRE)","slug":"the-national-survey-on-child-and-adolescent-well-being-ii-nscaw-ii-general-release-waves-1-a41bb","spatial_centroid":{"lat":34.4819914,"lon":-101.6218762},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[[-124.733253,24.544245],[-124.733253,49.388611],[-66.954811,49.388611],[-66.954811,24.544245],[-124.733253,24.544245]]]],"type":"MultiPolygon"},"theme":["human services"],"title":"The National Survey on Child and Adolescent Well-Being II (NSCAW II) General Release, Waves 1-3","type":"dataset"},{"_score":6.2153797,"_sort":[1790625799376,6.2153797,0,"a594f1ae-14e3-4ffc-8e27-789ab01b5f70"],"access_level":"restricted public","dcat":{"@type":"Dataset","accessRights":"restricted public","contactPoint":[{"@type":"Kind","fn":"OPRE Hub","hasEmail":"mailto:OPREhub@acf.hhs.gov"}],"description":"In 1990, the United States Congress authorized a major program designed to enhance the early public school transitions of former Head Start children and their families. Former Head Start children, like many other children living in poverty, were at risk for poor school achievement. This new program was launched to test the value of extending comprehensive, Head Start-like supports \"upward\" through the first four years of elementary school. This project, administered by the Head Start Bureau of the Administration on Children, Youth, and Families, funded 31 local Transition Demonstration Programs in 30 states and the Navajo Nation from the 1991-1992 school year through the 1997-1998 school year and involved more than 450 public schools. The National Transition Demonstration Study was conducted to provide information about the implementation of this program and its impact on children, families, schools, and communities. More than 7,500 former Head Start children and families were enrolled in the National Study. Thousands of other children and families, however, participated in the Transition Demonstration Program, since supports and educational enhancements were offered to all children and families in the classrooms. The datasets are organized into four broad categories: Family Units -- There are six family unit files. A \"family unit\" record consists of information about a child or family as the result of source data taken from family interviews, records of child test scores on a child instrument, school archival records, or teacher questionnaires (Part B). If data were available from any combination of these source documents, a family unit record was generated. A broad range of variables are included under this heading. Variables range from simple demographics to standardized scores of social skill ratings as well as neighborhood factor scores and child outcome scores in reading and mathematics. These files are associated with each year of the child's schooling (kindergarten through third grade). School Unit -- There are five school unit files, organized around the year of data collection. A \"school unit\" record consists of information about a school as the result of source data captured from family interviews, a classroom teacher, or the school principal. The structure of this data file is different from others in that rather than being merged on a common key, the records are actually stacked one upon the other in groups. The first part of the file consists of family data, the middle portion consists of teacher data, and the final portion consists of principal data. A key variable to the construction of this dataset is the REC_SRC (record source) variable. It informs the user as to the source of the data in the record. The abbreviations are \"fi,\" \"ta,\" and \"qp\" for family interview, teacher questionnaire (Part A), and questionnaire for principals, respectively. The data viewed as the centerpiece of these datasets are the school climate survey variables and their associated factor scores. Classroom Unit -- There are five classroom unit files organized around the year of data collection. The data recorded focus on the classroom and are from the following sources: classroom composition, assessment profile, a developmentally appropriate practice template, and a teacher questionnaire (part a). Some of the data available address the social skills the teacher views as important to his or her particular classroom. Variables addressing diversity of both gender and ethnicity within a single classroom are included when available. Exit Interviews -- There are five Exit Interviews. Exit information was collected from the following groups: experimental and control families, family service specialists, school principals, and classroom teachers. These exit interviews were conducted upon exit from the third grade, and have been combined for both cohorts. Community Characteristics Data -- The community characteristics dataset is a hierarchical file having four distinct levels of data. The type of information available in this file may include data that describe the site, county, school district, or study school. Users of these data are strongly encouraged to consult the accompanying documentation before attempting to use these files.","distribution":[{"@type":"Distribution","accessURL":"https://www.childandfamilydataarchive.org/cfda/archives/cfda/studies/4712"}],"identifier":"acf-opre-0087","inventoried":"2026-09-27","keyword":["early childhood services","education","family support services","public health"],"landingPage":{"@type":"Document","accessURL":"https://www.childandfamilydataarchive.org/cfda/pages/cfda/data.html","title":"National Head Start/Public School Early Childhood Transition Demonstration Study, 1991-1999 - Landing Page"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Office of Planning, Research & Evaluation (OPRE)","subOrganizationOf":[{"@type":"Organization","name":"Administration for Children and Families (ACF)"}]},"spatial":"[{\"@type\": \"Location\", \"prefLabel\": \"united states\"}]","theme":[{"@type":"Concept","prefLabel":"human services"}],"title":"National Head Start/Public School Early Childhood Transition Demonstration Study, 1991-1999"},"description":"In 1990, the United States Congress authorized a major program designed to enhance the early public school transitions of former Head Start children and their families. Former Head Start children, like many other children living in poverty, were at risk for poor school achievement. This new program was launched to test the value of extending comprehensive, Head Start-like supports \"upward\" through the first four years of elementary school. This project, administered by the Head Start Bureau of the Administration on Children, Youth, and Families, funded 31 local Transition Demonstration Programs in 30 states and the Navajo Nation from the 1991-1992 school year through the 1997-1998 school year and involved more than 450 public schools. The National Transition Demonstration Study was conducted to provide information about the implementation of this program and its impact on children, families, schools, and communities. More than 7,500 former Head Start children and families were enrolled in the National Study. Thousands of other children and families, however, participated in the Transition Demonstration Program, since supports and educational enhancements were offered to all children and families in the classrooms. The datasets are organized into four broad categories: Family Units -- There are six family unit files. A \"family unit\" record consists of information about a child or family as the result of source data taken from family interviews, records of child test scores on a child instrument, school archival records, or teacher questionnaires (Part B). If data were available from any combination of these source documents, a family unit record was generated. A broad range of variables are included under this heading. Variables range from simple demographics to standardized scores of social skill ratings as well as neighborhood factor scores and child outcome scores in reading and mathematics. These files are associated with each year of the child's schooling (kindergarten through third grade). School Unit -- There are five school unit files, organized around the year of data collection. A \"school unit\" record consists of information about a school as the result of source data captured from family interviews, a classroom teacher, or the school principal. The structure of this data file is different from others in that rather than being merged on a common key, the records are actually stacked one upon the other in groups. The first part of the file consists of family data, the middle portion consists of teacher data, and the final portion consists of principal data. A key variable to the construction of this dataset is the REC_SRC (record source) variable. It informs the user as to the source of the data in the record. The abbreviations are \"fi,\" \"ta,\" and \"qp\" for family interview, teacher questionnaire (Part A), and questionnaire for principals, respectively. The data viewed as the centerpiece of these datasets are the school climate survey variables and their associated factor scores. Classroom Unit -- There are five classroom unit files organized around the year of data collection. The data recorded focus on the classroom and are from the following sources: classroom composition, assessment profile, a developmentally appropriate practice template, and a teacher questionnaire (part a). Some of the data available address the social skills the teacher views as important to his or her particular classroom. Variables addressing diversity of both gender and ethnicity within a single classroom are included when available. Exit Interviews -- There are five Exit Interviews. Exit information was collected from the following groups: experimental and control families, family service specialists, school principals, and classroom teachers. These exit interviews were conducted upon exit from the third grade, and have been combined for both cohorts. Community Characteristics Data -- The community characteristics dataset is a hierarchical file having four distinct levels of data. The type of information available in this file may include data that describe the site, county, school district, or study school. Users of these data are strongly encouraged to consult the accompanying documentation before attempting to use these files.","distribution_titles":[],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/8e43b650-29db-40ce-a16f-7e5b8d2d0460","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/8e43b650-29db-40ce-a16f-7e5b8d2d0460/raw","has_download":false,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"acf-opre-0087","keyword":["early childhood services","education","family support services","public health"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-28T20:03:19.376882","organization":{"aliases":["US","dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"2c2fc21f-21d0-4450-af01-cf8c69b44156","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/hhs.png","name":"U.S. Department of Health & Human Services","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"hhs"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"Office of Planning, Research & Evaluation (OPRE)","slug":"national-head-start-public-school-early-childhood-transition-demonstration-study-1991-1999-1bf47","spatial_centroid":{"lat":34.4819914,"lon":-101.6218762},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[[-124.733253,24.544245],[-124.733253,49.388611],[-66.954811,49.388611],[-66.954811,24.544245],[-124.733253,24.544245]]]],"type":"MultiPolygon"},"theme":["human services"],"title":"National Head Start/Public School Early Childhood Transition Demonstration Study, 1991-1999","type":"dataset"},{"_score":24.910246,"_sort":[1790558805887,24.910246,0,"212db81d-5389-43b8-8ca1-7e2620d9efa0"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Ethan B. Plunkett","hasEmail":"mailto:plunkett@eco.umass.edu"},"description":"This package contains results from the Designing Sustainable Landscapes (DSL) Species Refugia project for Saltmarsh sparrow. The following files are included:\n1. Raster of Landscape Capability (LC) for (Saltmarsh sparrow)\n2. Raster of Climate Refugia (CRefugia) for (Saltmarsh sparrow) \n3. Polygon shapefile of all cores for (Saltmarsh sparrow)\n4. Conductance among 2020 cores for (Saltmarsh sparrow)\n5. Conductance among 2080 cores for (Saltmarsh sparrow)","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://landeco.umass.edu/web/lcc/dsl/refugia/species_refugia_sals.zip","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.6388dbfcd34ed907bf78e881.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6388dbfcd34ed907bf78e881","keyword":["Connecticut","Delaware","District of Columbia","Maine","Maryland","Massachusetts","New Hampshire","New Jersey","New York","North America","Pennsylvania","Rhode Island","USGS:6388dbfcd34ed907bf78e881","United States","Vermont","Virginia","West Virginia","biota","climate change","environment","geospatial datasets"],"modified":"2026-09-25T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-83.8015, 34.4437, -65.8410, 49.4647","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Current condition and refugia conservation cores for the Saltmarsh sparrow and conductance among them"},"description":"This package contains results from the Designing Sustainable Landscapes (DSL) Species Refugia project for Saltmarsh sparrow. The following files are included:\n1. Raster of Landscape Capability (LC) for (Saltmarsh sparrow)\n2. Raster of Climate Refugia (CRefugia) for (Saltmarsh sparrow) \n3. Polygon shapefile of all cores for (Saltmarsh sparrow)\n4. Conductance among 2020 cores for (Saltmarsh sparrow)\n5. Conductance among 2080 cores for (Saltmarsh sparrow)","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/2c062b20-fd05-43c8-9931-7b492ffbe5c6","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/2c062b20-fd05-43c8-9931-7b492ffbe5c6/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6388dbfcd34ed907bf78e881","keyword":["Connecticut","Delaware","District of Columbia","Maine","Maryland","Massachusetts","New Hampshire","New Jersey","New York","North America","Pennsylvania","Rhode Island","USGS:6388dbfcd34ed907bf78e881","United States","Vermont","Virginia","West Virginia","biota","climate change","environment","geospatial datasets"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-28T01:26:45.887264","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"current-condition-and-refugia-conservation-cores-for-the-saltmarsh-sparrow-and-conductance","spatial_centroid":{"lat":40.4521,"lon":-76.6173},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-83.8015,34.4437],[-83.8015,49.4647],[-65.841,49.4647],[-65.841,34.4437],[-83.8015,34.4437]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Current condition and refugia conservation cores for the Saltmarsh sparrow and conductance among them","type":"dataset"},{"_score":25.489399,"_sort":[1790558576514,25.489399,0,"f4f44ad4-d0f5-40f0-afee-7954aae64e28"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Ethan Plunkett","hasEmail":"mailto:eplunkett@eco.umass.edu"},"description":"This package contains results from the Designing Sustainable Landscapes (DSL) Species Refugia project for Moose. The following files are included:\n1. Raster of Landscape Capability (LC) for Moose\n2. Raster of Climate Refugia (CRefugia) for Moose\n3. Polygon shapefile of all cores for Moose\n4. Conductance among 2020 cores for Moose\n5. Conductance among 2080 cores for Moose","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://landeco.umass.edu/web/lcc/dsl/refugia/species_refugia_moose.zip","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.636aa41dd34ed907bf6a6b22.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_636aa41dd34ed907bf6a6b22","keyword":["Connecticut","Delaware","District of Columbia","Maine","Maryland","Massachusetts","New Hampshire","New Jersey","New York","North America","Pennsylvania","Rhode Island","USGS:636aa41dd34ed907bf6a6b22","United States","Vermont","Virginia","West Virginia","biota","climate change","environment","geospatial datasets"],"modified":"2026-09-25T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-83.8015, 34.4437, -65.8410, 49.4647","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Current condition and refugia conservation cores for Moose and conductance among them"},"description":"This package contains results from the Designing Sustainable Landscapes (DSL) Species Refugia project for Moose. The following files are included:\n1. Raster of Landscape Capability (LC) for Moose\n2. Raster of Climate Refugia (CRefugia) for Moose\n3. Polygon shapefile of all cores for Moose\n4. Conductance among 2020 cores for Moose\n5. Conductance among 2080 cores for Moose","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/f1e11442-e447-40b6-be2d-3c66f90c5273","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/f1e11442-e447-40b6-be2d-3c66f90c5273/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_636aa41dd34ed907bf6a6b22","keyword":["Connecticut","Delaware","District of Columbia","Maine","Maryland","Massachusetts","New Hampshire","New Jersey","New York","North America","Pennsylvania","Rhode Island","USGS:636aa41dd34ed907bf6a6b22","United States","Vermont","Virginia","West Virginia","biota","climate change","environment","geospatial datasets"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-28T01:22:56.514107","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"current-condition-and-refugia-conservation-cores-for-moose-and-conductance-among-them","spatial_centroid":{"lat":40.4521,"lon":-76.6173},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-83.8015,34.4437],[-83.8015,49.4647],[-65.841,49.4647],[-65.841,34.4437],[-83.8015,34.4437]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Current condition and refugia conservation cores for Moose and conductance among them","type":"dataset"},{"_score":24.670494,"_sort":[1790558194744,24.670494,0,"79ae3bf4-8b57-4695-acd8-fb902a2a14ce"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Ethan B. Plunkett","hasEmail":"mailto:plunkett@eco.umass.edu"},"description":"This package contains results from the Designing Sustainable Landscapes (DSL) Species Refugia project for Box turtle (teca). The following files are included:\n1. Raster of Landscape Capability (LC) for Box turtle\n2. Raster of Climate Refugia (CRefugia) for Box turtle\n3. Polygon shapefile of all cores for Box turtle\n4. Conductance among 2020 cores for Box turtle\n5. Conductance among 2080 cores for Box turtle","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://landeco.umass.edu/web/lcc/dsl/refugia/species_refugia_teca.zip","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.63867543d34ed907bf77a190.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_63867543d34ed907bf77a190","keyword":["Connecticut","Delaware","District of Columbia","Maine","Maryland","Massachusetts","New Hampshire","New Jersey","New York","North America","Pennsylvania","Rhode Island","USGS:63867543d34ed907bf77a190","United States","Vermont","Virginia","West Virginia","biota","climate change","environment","geospatial dataset"],"modified":"2026-09-25T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-83.8015, 34.4437, -65.8410, 49.4647","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Current condition and refugia conservation cores for the Box turtle and conductance among them"},"description":"This package contains results from the Designing Sustainable Landscapes (DSL) Species Refugia project for Box turtle (teca). The following files are included:\n1. Raster of Landscape Capability (LC) for Box turtle\n2. Raster of Climate Refugia (CRefugia) for Box turtle\n3. Polygon shapefile of all cores for Box turtle\n4. Conductance among 2020 cores for Box turtle\n5. Conductance among 2080 cores for Box turtle","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/3dee1bb1-d71f-481c-a97a-ebe13159fb27","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/3dee1bb1-d71f-481c-a97a-ebe13159fb27/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_63867543d34ed907bf77a190","keyword":["Connecticut","Delaware","District of Columbia","Maine","Maryland","Massachusetts","New Hampshire","New Jersey","New York","North America","Pennsylvania","Rhode Island","USGS:63867543d34ed907bf77a190","United States","Vermont","Virginia","West Virginia","biota","climate change","environment","geospatial dataset"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-28T01:16:34.744668","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"current-condition-and-refugia-conservation-cores-for-the-box-turtle-and-conductance-among-","spatial_centroid":{"lat":40.4521,"lon":-76.6173},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-83.8015,34.4437],[-83.8015,49.4647],[-65.841,49.4647],[-65.841,34.4437],[-83.8015,34.4437]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Current condition and refugia conservation cores for the Box turtle and conductance among them","type":"dataset"},{"_score":25.888931,"_sort":[1790558150225,25.888931,0,"66bdb0c0-0a01-4ec7-b687-d237ceb6c06b"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Climate Adaptation Science Centers","hasEmail":"mailto:casc-data@usgs.gov"},"description":"Cold-induced mortality is a key factor driving mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae, population dynamics. In this species, the supercooling point (SCP) is representative of mortality induced by acute cold exposure. Mountain pine beetle SCP and associated cold-induced mortality fluctuate throughout a generation, with the highest SCPs prior to and following winter. Using observed SCPs of field-collected D. ponderosae larvae throughout the developmental season and associated phloem temperatures, we developed a mechanistic model that describes the SCP distribution of a population as a function of daily changes in the temperature-dependent processes leading to gain and loss of cold tolerance. It is based on the changing proportion of individuals in three states: (1) a non cold-hardened, feeding state, (2) an intermediate state in which insects have ceased feeding, voided their gut content and eliminated as many ice-nucleating agents as possible from the body, and (3) a fully cold-hardened state where insects have accumulated a maximum concentration of cryoprotectants (e.g. glycerol). Shifts in the proportion of individuals in each state occur in response to the driving variables influencing the opposite rates of gain and loss of cold hardening. The level of cold-induced mortality predicted by the model and its relation to extreme winter temperature is in good agreement with a range of field and laboratory observations. Our model predicts that cold tolerance of D. ponderosae varies within a season, among seasons, and among geographic locations depending on local climate. This variability is an emergent property of the model, and has important implications for understanding the insect's response to seasonal fluctuations in temperature, as well as population response to climate change. Because cold-induced mortality is but one of several major influences of climate on D. ponderosae population dynamics, we suggest that this model be integrated with others simulating the insect's biology.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P1BIZ9OI","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.57474116e4b07e28b663d884.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_57474116e4b07e28b663d884","keyword":["Cold hardiness","Cold resistance","Cold tolerance","Idaho","Model","Montana","Mountain pine beetle","Supercooling point","USGS:57474116e4b07e28b663d884","Washington","Winter mortality","biota","climate change","external research support","geospatial datasets","pre-SM502.8"],"modified":"2026-09-25T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-125.0000, 46.5000, -114.0000, 49.0000","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Modeling cold tolerance in the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae"},"description":"Cold-induced mortality is a key factor driving mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae, population dynamics. In this species, the supercooling point (SCP) is representative of mortality induced by acute cold exposure. Mountain pine beetle SCP and associated cold-induced mortality fluctuate throughout a generation, with the highest SCPs prior to and following winter. Using observed SCPs of field-collected D. ponderosae larvae throughout the developmental season and associated phloem temperatures, we developed a mechanistic model that describes the SCP distribution of a population as a function of daily changes in the temperature-dependent processes leading to gain and loss of cold tolerance. It is based on the changing proportion of individuals in three states: (1) a non cold-hardened, feeding state, (2) an intermediate state in which insects have ceased feeding, voided their gut content and eliminated as many ice-nucleating agents as possible from the body, and (3) a fully cold-hardened state where insects have accumulated a maximum concentration of cryoprotectants (e.g. glycerol). Shifts in the proportion of individuals in each state occur in response to the driving variables influencing the opposite rates of gain and loss of cold hardening. The level of cold-induced mortality predicted by the model and its relation to extreme winter temperature is in good agreement with a range of field and laboratory observations. Our model predicts that cold tolerance of D. ponderosae varies within a season, among seasons, and among geographic locations depending on local climate. This variability is an emergent property of the model, and has important implications for understanding the insect's response to seasonal fluctuations in temperature, as well as population response to climate change. Because cold-induced mortality is but one of several major influences of climate on D. ponderosae population dynamics, we suggest that this model be integrated with others simulating the insect's biology.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/23c3114a-ed15-41d0-b1b9-fba956e01212","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/23c3114a-ed15-41d0-b1b9-fba956e01212/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_57474116e4b07e28b663d884","keyword":["Cold hardiness","Cold resistance","Cold tolerance","Idaho","Model","Montana","Mountain pine beetle","Supercooling point","USGS:57474116e4b07e28b663d884","Washington","Winter mortality","biota","climate change","external research support","geospatial datasets","pre-SM502.8"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-28T01:15:50.225353","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"modeling-cold-tolerance-in-the-mountain-pine-beetle-dendroctonus-ponderosae","spatial_centroid":{"lat":47.5,"lon":-120.6},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-125.0,46.5],[-125.0,49.0],[-114.0,49.0],[-114.0,46.5],[-125.0,46.5]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Modeling cold tolerance in the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae","type":"dataset"},{"_score":30.389517,"_sort":[1790558055217,30.389517,4,"423fc091-fe9a-4198-ba15-a156134fd8fe"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Ethan B. Plunkett","hasEmail":"mailto:plunkett@eco.umass.edu"},"description":"These data delineate and characterize conservation cores built for seven species based on their current 2020 Landscape Capability and future (2080) Climate Refugia, as well as the conductivity among the future and current cores. For seven species: American woodcock (amwo), Bicknell's thrush (bith), Blackburnian warbler (blbw), Box turtle (teca), Cerulean warbler (cerw), Moose (moose), and Saltmarsh sparrow (sals) we provide five distinct datasets. Species codes (in parentheses) are used in file names and represented by \"[species]\"  below.\n1. A set of conservation cores that represent areas of high local, relative value to the species either in the present, the future, or both: [species]_allcores.shp\n2. Conductance among the present condition cores: [species]_conduct.tif \n3. Conductance among the future cores:  [species]_conduct_futr.tif\n4. The landscape capability of the species in 2020 (an input dataset to this analysis): [species]_LC_2020_v5.1.tif\n5. The climate refugia for the species in 2080 (an input dataset to this analysis):  [species]_Crefugia_2080_v5.1.tif","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.21429/94ey-r171","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.5d5ae337e4b01d82ce8ed143.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_5d5ae337e4b01d82ce8ed143","keyword":["Climate","Refugia","USGS:5d5ae337e4b01d82ce8ed143","biota","climate change","geospatial datasets"],"modified":"2026-09-25T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-83.8015, 34.4437, -65.8410, 49.4647","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Current condition and refugia conservation cores for seven species and conductance among them."},"description":"These data delineate and characterize conservation cores built for seven species based on their current 2020 Landscape Capability and future (2080) Climate Refugia, as well as the conductivity among the future and current cores. For seven species: American woodcock (amwo), Bicknell's thrush (bith), Blackburnian warbler (blbw), Box turtle (teca), Cerulean warbler (cerw), Moose (moose), and Saltmarsh sparrow (sals) we provide five distinct datasets. Species codes (in parentheses) are used in file names and represented by \"[species]\"  below.\n1. A set of conservation cores that represent areas of high local, relative value to the species either in the present, the future, or both: [species]_allcores.shp\n2. Conductance among the present condition cores: [species]_conduct.tif \n3. Conductance among the future cores:  [species]_conduct_futr.tif\n4. The landscape capability of the species in 2020 (an input dataset to this analysis): [species]_LC_2020_v5.1.tif\n5. The climate refugia for the species in 2080 (an input dataset to this analysis):  [species]_Crefugia_2080_v5.1.tif","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/2548ce7e-20de-4534-9617-a7db61e32fa4","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/2548ce7e-20de-4534-9617-a7db61e32fa4/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_5d5ae337e4b01d82ce8ed143","keyword":["Climate","Refugia","USGS:5d5ae337e4b01d82ce8ed143","biota","climate change","geospatial datasets"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-28T01:14:15.217628","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":4,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"current-condition-and-refugia-conservation-cores-for-seven-species-and-conductance-among-t","spatial_centroid":{"lat":40.4521,"lon":-76.6173},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-83.8015,34.4437],[-83.8015,49.4647],[-65.841,49.4647],[-65.841,34.4437],[-83.8015,34.4437]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Current condition and refugia conservation cores for seven species and conductance among them.","type":"dataset"},{"_score":8.502413,"_sort":[1790557674977,8.502413,0,"23a3b81c-25e7-43d4-8a7f-deaefef6723b"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Curtis M. Belyea","hasEmail":"mailto:cbelyea@ncsu.edu"},"description":"This dataset represents the extent of urbanization (for the year indicated) predicted by the model SLEUTH, developed by Dr. Keith C. Clarke, at the University of California, Santa Barbara, Department of Geography and modified by David I. Donato of the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Eastern Geographic Science Center (EGSC). Further model modification and implementation was performed at the Biodiversity and Spatial Information Center at North Carolina State University. Purpose: Urban growth probability extents throughout the 21st century for the Southeast Regional Assessment Project, which encompasses the states of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia and parts of the states of Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana, Maryland, Missouri, Ohio and West Virginia. Credit: Southeast Regional Assessment Project; Biodiversity and Spatial Information Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, Curtis M. Belyea. Use Limitation: This data set is not intended for site-specific analyses. Interpretations derived from its use are suited for regional and planning purposes only. These data are not intended to be used at scales larger than 1:100,000. Acknowledgment of Biodiversity and Spatial Analysis Center at North Carolina State University is appreciated.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://api.water.usgs.gov/gdp/pygeoapi/stac/stac-collection/serap/serap_urb","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.67780a7ed34edab7af6e2877.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_67780a7ed34edab7af6e2877","keyword":["Alabama","Florida","Georgia","North Carolina","SLEUTH","South Carolina","Southeast US","USGS:67780a7ed34edab7af6e2877","Virginia","climate change","climatologyMeteorologyAtmosphere","development","geospatial datasets","land use change","project Gigalopolis","society","structure","transportation","urbanization"],"modified":"2026-09-25T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-85.4825, 28.2716, -74.9808, 38.1625","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Urban Growth Projection for Southeast Regional Assessment Project"},"description":"This dataset represents the extent of urbanization (for the year indicated) predicted by the model SLEUTH, developed by Dr. Keith C. Clarke, at the University of California, Santa Barbara, Department of Geography and modified by David I. Donato of the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Eastern Geographic Science Center (EGSC). Further model modification and implementation was performed at the Biodiversity and Spatial Information Center at North Carolina State University. Purpose: Urban growth probability extents throughout the 21st century for the Southeast Regional Assessment Project, which encompasses the states of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia and parts of the states of Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana, Maryland, Missouri, Ohio and West Virginia. Credit: Southeast Regional Assessment Project; Biodiversity and Spatial Information Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, Curtis M. Belyea. Use Limitation: This data set is not intended for site-specific analyses. Interpretations derived from its use are suited for regional and planning purposes only. These data are not intended to be used at scales larger than 1:100,000. Acknowledgment of Biodiversity and Spatial Analysis Center at North Carolina State University is appreciated.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/b0828ee5-9f72-4184-9951-e127800d5e14","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/b0828ee5-9f72-4184-9951-e127800d5e14/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_67780a7ed34edab7af6e2877","keyword":["Alabama","Florida","Georgia","North Carolina","SLEUTH","South Carolina","Southeast US","USGS:67780a7ed34edab7af6e2877","Virginia","climate change","climatologyMeteorologyAtmosphere","development","geospatial datasets","land use change","project Gigalopolis","society","structure","transportation","urbanization"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-28T01:07:54.977096","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"urban-growth-projection-for-southeast-regional-assessment-project","spatial_centroid":{"lat":32.22796,"lon":-81.28182000000001},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-85.4825,28.2716],[-85.4825,38.1625],[-74.9808,38.1625],[-74.9808,28.2716],[-85.4825,28.2716]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Urban Growth Projection for Southeast Regional Assessment Project","type":"dataset"},{"_score":24.599934,"_sort":[1790557422184,24.599934,0,"3694a583-b319-4060-b613-f3748a237ea7"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Ethan B. Plunkett","hasEmail":"mailto:plunkett@eco.umass.edu"},"description":"This package contains results from the Designing Sustainable Landscapes (DSL) Species Refugia project for Blackburnian warbler. The following files are included:\n1. Raster of Landscape Capability (LC) for BLBW (Blackburnian warbler)\n2. Raster of Climate Refugia (CRefugia) for BLBW (Blackburnian warbler)\n3. Polygon shapefile of all cores for BLBW (Blackburnian warbler)\n4. Conductance among 2020 cores for BLBW (Blackburnian warbler)\n5. Conductance among 2080 cores for BLBW (Blackburnian warbler)","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://landeco.umass.edu/web/lcc/dsl/refugia/species_refugia_blbw.zip","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.635c164cd34ebe442504b224.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_635c164cd34ebe442504b224","keyword":["Connecticut","Delaware","District of Columbia","Maine","Maryland","Massachusetts","New Hampshire","New Jersey","New York","North America","Pennsylvania","Rhode Island","USGS:635c164cd34ebe442504b224","United States","Vermont","Virginia","West Virginia","biota","climate change","environment","geospatial datasets"],"modified":"2026-09-25T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-83.8015, 34.4437, -65.8410, 49.4647","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Current condition and refugia conservation cores for the Blackburnian warbler and conductance among them"},"description":"This package contains results from the Designing Sustainable Landscapes (DSL) Species Refugia project for Blackburnian warbler. The following files are included:\n1. Raster of Landscape Capability (LC) for BLBW (Blackburnian warbler)\n2. Raster of Climate Refugia (CRefugia) for BLBW (Blackburnian warbler)\n3. Polygon shapefile of all cores for BLBW (Blackburnian warbler)\n4. Conductance among 2020 cores for BLBW (Blackburnian warbler)\n5. Conductance among 2080 cores for BLBW (Blackburnian warbler)","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/dccf299f-8309-4501-9572-447ec3f6e842","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/dccf299f-8309-4501-9572-447ec3f6e842/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_635c164cd34ebe442504b224","keyword":["Connecticut","Delaware","District of Columbia","Maine","Maryland","Massachusetts","New Hampshire","New Jersey","New York","North America","Pennsylvania","Rhode Island","USGS:635c164cd34ebe442504b224","United States","Vermont","Virginia","West Virginia","biota","climate change","environment","geospatial datasets"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-28T01:03:42.184982","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"current-condition-and-refugia-conservation-cores-for-the-blackburnian-warbler-and-conducta","spatial_centroid":{"lat":40.4521,"lon":-76.6173},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-83.8015,34.4437],[-83.8015,49.4647],[-65.841,49.4647],[-65.841,34.4437],[-83.8015,34.4437]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Current condition and refugia conservation cores for the Blackburnian warbler and conductance among them","type":"dataset"},{"_score":52.703857,"_sort":[1790557240044,52.703857,2,"25757b05-e317-4ece-9d68-4afd82934e50"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Craig Paukert","hasEmail":"mailto:paukertc@missouri.edu"},"description":"Human impacts occurring throughout the Northeast United StatesDOI Northeast Climate Science Center, including urbanization, agriculture, and dams, have multiple effects on the region\u2019s streams which support economically valuable stream fishes. Changes in climate are expected to lead to additional impacts in stream habitats and fish assemblages in multiple ways, including changing stream water temperatures.  To manage streams for current impacts and future changes, managers need region-wide information for decision-making and developing proactive management strategies.  Our project met that need by integrating results of a current condition assessment of stream habitats based on fish response to human land use, water quality impairment, and fragmentation by dams with estimates of which stream habitats may change in the future.  Results are available for all streams in the NE CSC region through a spatially-explicit, web-based viewer (FishTail).  With this tool, managers can evaluate how streams of interest are currently impacted by land uses and assess if those habitats may change with climate.  These results, available in a comparable way throughout the NE CSC, provide natural resource managers, decision-makers, and the public with a wealth of information to better protect and conserve stream fishes and their habitats. These data are integrated into a web-based decision support viewer (FishTail): 1) current condition of streams determined from disturbances limiting stream fishes, 2) future conditions resulting from changes in climate, and, 3) changes in water temperature for key locations resulting from climate changes for all streams of the NE CSC region. The report that documents these data is: Daniel, W., N. Sievert, D. Infante, J. Whittier, J. Stewart, C. Paukert, and K. Herreman.  2016.  A decision support mapper for conserving stream fish habitats of the Northeast Climate Science Center region.  Final Report to the US Geological Survey, Northeast Climate Science Center, Amherst, MA.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"http://dx.doi.org/10.5066/F7GQ6W7C","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.590a049de4b0fc4e44916012.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_590a049de4b0fc4e44916012","keyword":["Aquatic habitats","Connecticut","Delaware","Illinois","Indiana","Iowa","Kentucky","Maine","Maryland","Massachusetts","Michigan","Minnesota","Missouri","New Hampshire","New Jersey","New York","Ohio","Pennsylvania","Rhode Island","USGS:590a049de4b0fc4e44916012","Vermont","Virginia","Washington D.C.","West Virginia","Wisconsin","climate change","climatologyMeteorologyAtmosphere","drainage basins","geospatial datasets","habitat fragmentation","inlandWaters","land use and land cover","rivers","streams","water quality"],"modified":"2026-09-25T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-97.226778032, 35.99626825, -66.987685522, 49.340954638","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"FishTail, Indices and Supporting Data Characterizing the Current and Future Risk to Fish Habitat Degradation in the Northeast Climate Science Center Region"},"description":"Human impacts occurring throughout the Northeast United StatesDOI Northeast Climate Science Center, including urbanization, agriculture, and dams, have multiple effects on the region\u2019s streams which support economically valuable stream fishes. Changes in climate are expected to lead to additional impacts in stream habitats and fish assemblages in multiple ways, including changing stream water temperatures.  To manage streams for current impacts and future changes, managers need region-wide information for decision-making and developing proactive management strategies.  Our project met that need by integrating results of a current condition assessment of stream habitats based on fish response to human land use, water quality impairment, and fragmentation by dams with estimates of which stream habitats may change in the future.  Results are available for all streams in the NE CSC region through a spatially-explicit, web-based viewer (FishTail).  With this tool, managers can evaluate how streams of interest are currently impacted by land uses and assess if those habitats may change with climate.  These results, available in a comparable way throughout the NE CSC, provide natural resource managers, decision-makers, and the public with a wealth of information to better protect and conserve stream fishes and their habitats. These data are integrated into a web-based decision support viewer (FishTail): 1) current condition of streams determined from disturbances limiting stream fishes, 2) future conditions resulting from changes in climate, and, 3) changes in water temperature for key locations resulting from climate changes for all streams of the NE CSC region. The report that documents these data is: Daniel, W., N. Sievert, D. Infante, J. Whittier, J. Stewart, C. Paukert, and K. Herreman.  2016.  A decision support mapper for conserving stream fish habitats of the Northeast Climate Science Center region.  Final Report to the US Geological Survey, Northeast Climate Science Center, Amherst, MA.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/a05aef9a-2ca4-4cf3-9c0f-f844c0944f99","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/a05aef9a-2ca4-4cf3-9c0f-f844c0944f99/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_590a049de4b0fc4e44916012","keyword":["Aquatic habitats","Connecticut","Delaware","Illinois","Indiana","Iowa","Kentucky","Maine","Maryland","Massachusetts","Michigan","Minnesota","Missouri","New Hampshire","New Jersey","New York","Ohio","Pennsylvania","Rhode Island","USGS:590a049de4b0fc4e44916012","Vermont","Virginia","Washington D.C.","West Virginia","Wisconsin","climate change","climatologyMeteorologyAtmosphere","drainage basins","geospatial datasets","habitat fragmentation","inlandWaters","land use and land cover","rivers","streams","water quality"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-28T01:00:40.044616","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":2,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"fishtail-indices-and-supporting-data-characterizing-the-current-and-future-risk-to-fish-ha","spatial_centroid":{"lat":41.334142805199996,"lon":-85.131141028},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-97.226778032,35.99626825],[-97.226778032,49.340954638],[-66.987685522,49.340954638],[-66.987685522,35.99626825],[-97.226778032,35.99626825]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"FishTail, Indices and Supporting Data Characterizing the Current and Future Risk to Fish Habitat Degradation in the Northeast Climate Science Center Region","type":"dataset"},{"_score":24.480587,"_sort":[1790556838462,24.480587,0,"34b1930f-a110-48d0-957d-f97156864b30"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Ethan Plunkett","hasEmail":"mailto:eplunkett@eco.umass.edu"},"description":"This package contains results from the Designing Sustainable Landscapes (DSL) Species Refugia project for Bicknell's thrush. The following files are included:\n1.Raster of Landscape Capability (LC) for BITH (Bicknell's thrush)\n2. Raster of Climate Refugia (CRefugia) for BITH (Bicknell's thrush)\n3.Polygon shapefile of all cores for BITH (Bicknell's thrush)\n4. Conductance among 2020 cores for BITH (Bicknell's thrush)\n5. Conductance among 2080 cores for BITH (Bicknell's thrush)","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://landeco.umass.edu/web/lcc/dsl/refugia/species_refugia_bith.zip","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.635c1283d34ebe442504b1f7.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_635c1283d34ebe442504b1f7","keyword":["Connecticut","Delaware","District of Columbia","Maine","Maryland","Massachusetts","New Hampshire","New Jersey","New York","North America","Pennsylvania","Rhode Island","USGS:635c1283d34ebe442504b1f7","United States","Vermont","Virginia","West Virginia","biota","climate change","environment","geospatial datasets"],"modified":"2026-09-25T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-83.8015, 34.4437, -65.8410, 49.4647","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Current condition and refugia conservation cores for Bicknell's thrush and conductance among them"},"description":"This package contains results from the Designing Sustainable Landscapes (DSL) Species Refugia project for Bicknell's thrush. The following files are included:\n1.Raster of Landscape Capability (LC) for BITH (Bicknell's thrush)\n2. Raster of Climate Refugia (CRefugia) for BITH (Bicknell's thrush)\n3.Polygon shapefile of all cores for BITH (Bicknell's thrush)\n4. Conductance among 2020 cores for BITH (Bicknell's thrush)\n5. Conductance among 2080 cores for BITH (Bicknell's thrush)","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/26e959c1-bd3e-45ef-9094-51a0a0ea0525","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/26e959c1-bd3e-45ef-9094-51a0a0ea0525/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_635c1283d34ebe442504b1f7","keyword":["Connecticut","Delaware","District of Columbia","Maine","Maryland","Massachusetts","New Hampshire","New Jersey","New York","North America","Pennsylvania","Rhode Island","USGS:635c1283d34ebe442504b1f7","United States","Vermont","Virginia","West Virginia","biota","climate change","environment","geospatial datasets"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-28T00:53:58.462648","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"current-condition-and-refugia-conservation-cores-for-bicknells-thrush-and-conductance-amon","spatial_centroid":{"lat":40.4521,"lon":-76.6173},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-83.8015,34.4437],[-83.8015,49.4647],[-65.841,49.4647],[-65.841,34.4437],[-83.8015,34.4437]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Current condition and refugia conservation cores for Bicknell's thrush and conductance among them","type":"dataset"},{"_score":6.5006504,"_sort":[1790556504941,6.5006504,0,"a2a80797-3aad-4f87-a5eb-3e02fa9b9135"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"OBIS-USA data manager","hasEmail":"mailto:csas@usgs.gov"},"description":"These data include species occurrence records of fish in oceans within 1000 kilometers of the United States shoreline.  This dataset is a subset of the OBIS-USA dataset as of December 2, 2014 and includes records of the taxonomic groups of Actinopterygii, Chondrichthyes, Myxini, Osteichthyes, and Petromyzontida.  After initial taxonomic queries, the remaining data were further queried to retain only samples within 1000 kilometers of the U.S. shoreline. Spatial queries were then used to remove samples overlaying land masses.  Data are provided in a geodatabase format, as well as a comma seperated values format.  \nOBIS-USA provides aggregated, interoperable biogeographic data collected primarily from U.S. waters and oceanic regions--the Arctic, the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, the Caribbean Sea, Gulf of Mexico and the Great Lakes. It provides access to datasets from state and federal agencies as well as educational and research institutions. OBIS-USA handles both specimen-based data and survey results. Survey data come from recovered archives and current research activities. The datasets document where and when species were observed or collected, bringing together marine biogeographic data that are spatially, taxonomically, and temporally comprehensive. The public OBIS-USA site (http://www.usgs.gov/obis-usa) provides actual data contents as well as summary data about what is contained in each dataset to assist users in evaluating suitability for use. Current functionality allows the user to locate, view, and aggregate the datasets and FGDC compliant metadata as well as to view and search the taxonomic, geographic, and temporal extent. To promote data interoperability, the data are available in accordance with the marine-focused implementation of the Darwin Core data standard. In addition to basic download functions (tab-delimited), OBIS-USA offers web services for query flexibility and a wide range of output formats, such as kml, NetCDF, MATLAB, json, and graph or map output, to enable diverse types of scientific and geospatial data use and analysis platforms and products. OBIS-USA's two web services (ERDDAP and GeoServer) enable integration of OBIS-USA biogeographic data with other data types, such as seafloor geology, physical oceanography, water chemistry, and climate data. The NOAA Environmental Research Division Data Access Program(ERRDDAP) enables users to query scientific data by flexible parameters and obtain output in many formats. Access can be found at http://www1.usgs.gov/erddap/tabledap/AllMBG.html. OBIS-USA uses the tabledap component of ERDDAP to access Darwin-Core-type tabular spatial data; tabledap is a superset of the OPeNDAP DAP constraint protocol. OBIS-USA offers an ESRI REST Service with access to Darwin-Core-type point data at http://gis1.usgs.gov/arcgis/rest/services/OBISUSA/OBIS_USA_All_Marine_Biogeographic_Records/MapServer/ and an OGC compliant Web Mapping Service (wms) \nhttp://gis1.usgs.gov/arcgis/services/OBISUSA/OBIS_USA_All_Marine_Biogeographic_Records/MapServer/WMSServer?request=GetCapabilities&amp;service=WMS. \nOBIS-USA and collaborators are further deploying the Darwin Core standard to capture richer information, such as absence and abundance, observations on effort, individual tracking, and more advanced biogeography capabilities. Data are accepted into OBIS-USA from the data originator or holder, minimizing the burden on the participant. OBIS-USA works with data providers to understand the best process to transfer the data, review the data prior to their release, gather comprehensive metadata, and then allow public access to this information. Becoming part of the OBIS-USA network is intended to have tangible benefits for participants, for example, freeing the participant from responding to requests for data and alleviating security concerns since users do not directly access the participant's computers.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/F7H41PGK","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.5395d79be4b0b4b172cbe6c7.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_5395d79be4b0b4b172cbe6c7","keyword":["Abundance (organisms)","Anadromous species","Aquatic animals","Aquatic environments","Aquatic habitats","Arctic Ocean","Atlantic Ocean","Biocomplexity","Biodiversity","Caribbean Sea","Catadromous species","Fishery management","Gulf of Maine","Gulf of Mexico","Marine ecosystems","Marine fishes","North America","OBIS","Ocean Biogeographic Information System","Pacific Ocean","Puget Sound","South Atlantic Bight","USGS:5395d79be4b0b4b172cbe6c7","United States","benthic habitat","biogeography","coastal habitat","reef habitat"],"modified":"2026-09-25T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-179.99667, 10.6, 179.9935, 75.51","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Fish Subset of Ocean Biogeographic Information System (OBIS) - USA Dataset Collection for NFHP Thematic Viewer 20141202"},"description":"These data include species occurrence records of fish in oceans within 1000 kilometers of the United States shoreline.  This dataset is a subset of the OBIS-USA dataset as of December 2, 2014 and includes records of the taxonomic groups of Actinopterygii, Chondrichthyes, Myxini, Osteichthyes, and Petromyzontida.  After initial taxonomic queries, the remaining data were further queried to retain only samples within 1000 kilometers of the U.S. shoreline. Spatial queries were then used to remove samples overlaying land masses.  Data are provided in a geodatabase format, as well as a comma seperated values format.  \nOBIS-USA provides aggregated, interoperable biogeographic data collected primarily from U.S. waters and oceanic regions--the Arctic, the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, the Caribbean Sea, Gulf of Mexico and the Great Lakes. It provides access to datasets from state and federal agencies as well as educational and research institutions. OBIS-USA handles both specimen-based data and survey results. Survey data come from recovered archives and current research activities. The datasets document where and when species were observed or collected, bringing together marine biogeographic data that are spatially, taxonomically, and temporally comprehensive. The public OBIS-USA site (http://www.usgs.gov/obis-usa) provides actual data contents as well as summary data about what is contained in each dataset to assist users in evaluating suitability for use. Current functionality allows the user to locate, view, and aggregate the datasets and FGDC compliant metadata as well as to view and search the taxonomic, geographic, and temporal extent. To promote data interoperability, the data are available in accordance with the marine-focused implementation of the Darwin Core data standard. In addition to basic download functions (tab-delimited), OBIS-USA offers web services for query flexibility and a wide range of output formats, such as kml, NetCDF, MATLAB, json, and graph or map output, to enable diverse types of scientific and geospatial data use and analysis platforms and products. OBIS-USA's two web services (ERDDAP and GeoServer) enable integration of OBIS-USA biogeographic data with other data types, such as seafloor geology, physical oceanography, water chemistry, and climate data. The NOAA Environmental Research Division Data Access Program(ERRDDAP) enables users to query scientific data by flexible parameters and obtain output in many formats. Access can be found at http://www1.usgs.gov/erddap/tabledap/AllMBG.html. OBIS-USA uses the tabledap component of ERDDAP to access Darwin-Core-type tabular spatial data; tabledap is a superset of the OPeNDAP DAP constraint protocol. OBIS-USA offers an ESRI REST Service with access to Darwin-Core-type point data at http://gis1.usgs.gov/arcgis/rest/services/OBISUSA/OBIS_USA_All_Marine_Biogeographic_Records/MapServer/ and an OGC compliant Web Mapping Service (wms) \nhttp://gis1.usgs.gov/arcgis/services/OBISUSA/OBIS_USA_All_Marine_Biogeographic_Records/MapServer/WMSServer?request=GetCapabilities&amp;service=WMS. \nOBIS-USA and collaborators are further deploying the Darwin Core standard to capture richer information, such as absence and abundance, observations on effort, individual tracking, and more advanced biogeography capabilities. Data are accepted into OBIS-USA from the data originator or holder, minimizing the burden on the participant. OBIS-USA works with data providers to understand the best process to transfer the data, review the data prior to their release, gather comprehensive metadata, and then allow public access to this information. Becoming part of the OBIS-USA network is intended to have tangible benefits for participants, for example, freeing the participant from responding to requests for data and alleviating security concerns since users do not directly access the participant's computers.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/acb6cd2d-abf5-4a93-b28d-109ab3a803a4","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/acb6cd2d-abf5-4a93-b28d-109ab3a803a4/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_5395d79be4b0b4b172cbe6c7","keyword":["Abundance (organisms)","Anadromous species","Aquatic animals","Aquatic environments","Aquatic habitats","Arctic Ocean","Atlantic Ocean","Biocomplexity","Biodiversity","Caribbean Sea","Catadromous species","Fishery management","Gulf of Maine","Gulf of Mexico","Marine ecosystems","Marine fishes","North America","OBIS","Ocean Biogeographic Information System","Pacific Ocean","Puget Sound","South Atlantic Bight","USGS:5395d79be4b0b4b172cbe6c7","United States","benthic habitat","biogeography","coastal habitat","reef habitat"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-28T00:48:24.941935","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"fish-subset-of-ocean-biogeographic-information-system-obis-usa-dataset-collection-for-nfhp","spatial_centroid":{"lat":36.56400000000001,"lon":-36.00060199999999},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-179.99667,10.6],[-179.99667,75.51],[179.9935,75.51],[179.9935,10.6],[-179.99667,10.6]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Fish Subset of Ocean Biogeographic Information System (OBIS) - USA Dataset Collection for NFHP Thematic Viewer 20141202","type":"dataset"},{"_score":24.599934,"_sort":[1790556469504,24.599934,0,"9fc7e6bd-f6b0-4f70-832e-0db303867a24"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Ethan B. Plunkett","hasEmail":"mailto:plunkett@eco.umass.edu"},"description":"This package contains results from the Designing Sustainable Landscapes (DSL) Species Refugia project for Cerulean warbler. The following files are included:\n1. Raster of Landscape Capability (LC) for CERW (Cerulean warbler)\n2. Raster of Climate Refugia (CRefugia) for CERW (Cerulean warbler)\n3. Polygon shapefile of all cores for CERW (Cerulean warbler)\n4. Conductance among 2020 cores for CERW (Cerulean warbler)\n5. Conductance among 2080 cores for CERW (Cerulean warbler)","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://landeco.umass.edu/web/lcc/dsl/refugia/species_refugia_cerw.zip","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.636a7c23d34ed907bf6a68ec.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_636a7c23d34ed907bf6a68ec","keyword":["Connecticut","Delaware","District of Columbia","Maine","Maryland","Massachusetts","New Hampshire","New Jersey","New York","North America","Pennsylvania","Rhode Island","USGS:636a7c23d34ed907bf6a68ec","United States","Vermont","Virginia","West Virginia","biota","climate change","environment","geospatial datasets"],"modified":"2026-09-25T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-83.8015, 34.4437, -65.8410, 49.4647","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Current condition and refugia conservation cores for the Cerulean warbler and conductance among them"},"description":"This package contains results from the Designing Sustainable Landscapes (DSL) Species Refugia project for Cerulean warbler. The following files are included:\n1. Raster of Landscape Capability (LC) for CERW (Cerulean warbler)\n2. Raster of Climate Refugia (CRefugia) for CERW (Cerulean warbler)\n3. Polygon shapefile of all cores for CERW (Cerulean warbler)\n4. Conductance among 2020 cores for CERW (Cerulean warbler)\n5. Conductance among 2080 cores for CERW (Cerulean warbler)","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/4e5c67c7-cf5c-4d7b-9fa8-39b3c3aea6ec","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/4e5c67c7-cf5c-4d7b-9fa8-39b3c3aea6ec/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_636a7c23d34ed907bf6a68ec","keyword":["Connecticut","Delaware","District of Columbia","Maine","Maryland","Massachusetts","New Hampshire","New Jersey","New York","North America","Pennsylvania","Rhode Island","USGS:636a7c23d34ed907bf6a68ec","United States","Vermont","Virginia","West Virginia","biota","climate change","environment","geospatial datasets"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-28T00:47:49.504363","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"current-condition-and-refugia-conservation-cores-for-the-cerulean-warbler-and-conductance-","spatial_centroid":{"lat":40.4521,"lon":-76.6173},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-83.8015,34.4437],[-83.8015,49.4647],[-65.841,49.4647],[-65.841,34.4437],[-83.8015,34.4437]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Current condition and refugia conservation cores for the Cerulean warbler and conductance among them","type":"dataset"},{"_score":6.532387,"_sort":[1790556363076,6.532387,0,"cc85cf66-585d-4872-9819-193b2704b98d"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"OBIS-USA data manager","hasEmail":"mailto:csas@usgs.gov"},"description":"Species occurrence records of the taxonomic class of Bivalvia in oceans within 1000 kilometers of the United States shoreline.  This is a subset of the OBIS-USA dataset where Bivalvia records were queried on December 2, 2014.  After initial queries, the remaining data were further queried to retain only samples within 1000 kilometers of the U.S. shoreline. Spatial queries were then used to remove samples overlaying land masses.  Data are provided in a geodatabase format, as well as a comma seperated values format.  \nOBIS-USA provides aggregated, interoperable biogeographic data collected primarily from U.S. waters and oceanic regions--the Arctic, the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, the Caribbean Sea, Gulf of Mexico and the Great Lakes. It provides access to datasets from state and federal agencies as well as educational and research institutions. OBIS-USA handles both specimen-based data and survey results. Survey data come from recovered archives and current research activities. The datasets document where and when species were observed or collected, bringing together marine biogeographic data that are spatially, taxonomically, and temporally comprehensive. The public OBIS-USA site (http://www.usgs.gov/obis-usa) provides actual data contents as well as summary data about what is contained in each dataset to assist users in evaluating suitability for use. Current functionality allows the user to locate, view, and aggregate the datasets and FGDC compliant metadata as well as to view and search the taxonomic, geographic, and temporal extent. To promote data interoperability, the data are available in accordance with the marine-focused implementation of the Darwin Core data standard. In addition to basic download functions (tab-delimited), OBIS-USA offers web services for query flexibility and a wide range of output formats, such as kml, NetCDF, MATLAB, json, and graph or map output, to enable diverse types of scientific and geospatial data use and analysis platforms and products. OBIS-USA's two web services (ERDDAP and GeoServer) enable integration of OBIS-USA biogeographic data with other data types, such as seafloor geology, physical oceanography, water chemistry, and climate data. The NOAA Environmental Research Division Data Access Program(ERRDDAP) enables users to query scientific data by flexible parameters and obtain output in many formats. Access can be found at http://www1.usgs.gov/erddap/tabledap/AllMBG.html. OBIS-USA uses the tabledap component of ERDDAP to access Darwin-Core-type tabular spatial data; tabledap is a superset of the OPeNDAP DAP constraint protocol. OBIS-USA offers an ESRI REST Service with access to Darwin-Core-type point data at http://gis1.usgs.gov/arcgis/rest/services/OBISUSA/OBIS_USA_All_Marine_Biogeographic_Records/MapServer/ and an OGC compliant Web Mapping Service (wms) \nhttp://gis1.usgs.gov/arcgis/services/OBISUSA/OBIS_USA_All_Marine_Biogeographic_Records/MapServer/WMSServer?request=GetCapabilities&amp;service=WMS. \nOBIS-USA and collaborators are further deploying the Darwin Core standard to capture richer information, such as absence and abundance, observations on effort, individual tracking, and more advanced biogeography capabilities. Data are accepted into OBIS-USA from the data originator or holder, minimizing the burden on the participant. OBIS-USA works with data providers to understand the best process to transfer the data, review the data prior to their release, gather comprehensive metadata, and then allow public access to this information. Becoming part of the OBIS-USA network is intended to have tangible benefits for participants, for example, freeing the participant from responding to requests for data and alleviating security concerns since users do not directly access the participant's computers.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/F7CC0XQD","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.547f5ed9e4b09357f06013f3.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_547f5ed9e4b09357f06013f3","keyword":["Abundance (organisms)","Aquatic animals","Aquatic environments","Aquatic habitats","Arctic Ocean","Atlantic Ocean","Biocomplexity","Biodiversity","Bivalves","Caribbean Sea","Fishery management","Gulf of Maine","Gulf of Mexico","Marine Invertbrates","Marine ecosystems","Marine mollusks","North America","OBIS","Ocean Biogeographic Information System","Pacific Ocean","Puget Sound","South Atlantic Bight","USGS:547f5ed9e4b09357f06013f3","United States","benthic habitat","biogeography","coastal habitat","reef habitat"],"modified":"2026-09-25T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-179.929999999, 11.9, 179.92, 75.93","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Bivalvia Subset of Ocean Biogeographic Information System (OBIS) - USA Dataset Collection for NFHP Thematic Viewer 20141202"},"description":"Species occurrence records of the taxonomic class of Bivalvia in oceans within 1000 kilometers of the United States shoreline.  This is a subset of the OBIS-USA dataset where Bivalvia records were queried on December 2, 2014.  After initial queries, the remaining data were further queried to retain only samples within 1000 kilometers of the U.S. shoreline. Spatial queries were then used to remove samples overlaying land masses.  Data are provided in a geodatabase format, as well as a comma seperated values format.  \nOBIS-USA provides aggregated, interoperable biogeographic data collected primarily from U.S. waters and oceanic regions--the Arctic, the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, the Caribbean Sea, Gulf of Mexico and the Great Lakes. It provides access to datasets from state and federal agencies as well as educational and research institutions. OBIS-USA handles both specimen-based data and survey results. Survey data come from recovered archives and current research activities. The datasets document where and when species were observed or collected, bringing together marine biogeographic data that are spatially, taxonomically, and temporally comprehensive. The public OBIS-USA site (http://www.usgs.gov/obis-usa) provides actual data contents as well as summary data about what is contained in each dataset to assist users in evaluating suitability for use. Current functionality allows the user to locate, view, and aggregate the datasets and FGDC compliant metadata as well as to view and search the taxonomic, geographic, and temporal extent. To promote data interoperability, the data are available in accordance with the marine-focused implementation of the Darwin Core data standard. In addition to basic download functions (tab-delimited), OBIS-USA offers web services for query flexibility and a wide range of output formats, such as kml, NetCDF, MATLAB, json, and graph or map output, to enable diverse types of scientific and geospatial data use and analysis platforms and products. OBIS-USA's two web services (ERDDAP and GeoServer) enable integration of OBIS-USA biogeographic data with other data types, such as seafloor geology, physical oceanography, water chemistry, and climate data. The NOAA Environmental Research Division Data Access Program(ERRDDAP) enables users to query scientific data by flexible parameters and obtain output in many formats. Access can be found at http://www1.usgs.gov/erddap/tabledap/AllMBG.html. OBIS-USA uses the tabledap component of ERDDAP to access Darwin-Core-type tabular spatial data; tabledap is a superset of the OPeNDAP DAP constraint protocol. OBIS-USA offers an ESRI REST Service with access to Darwin-Core-type point data at http://gis1.usgs.gov/arcgis/rest/services/OBISUSA/OBIS_USA_All_Marine_Biogeographic_Records/MapServer/ and an OGC compliant Web Mapping Service (wms) \nhttp://gis1.usgs.gov/arcgis/services/OBISUSA/OBIS_USA_All_Marine_Biogeographic_Records/MapServer/WMSServer?request=GetCapabilities&amp;service=WMS. \nOBIS-USA and collaborators are further deploying the Darwin Core standard to capture richer information, such as absence and abundance, observations on effort, individual tracking, and more advanced biogeography capabilities. Data are accepted into OBIS-USA from the data originator or holder, minimizing the burden on the participant. OBIS-USA works with data providers to understand the best process to transfer the data, review the data prior to their release, gather comprehensive metadata, and then allow public access to this information. Becoming part of the OBIS-USA network is intended to have tangible benefits for participants, for example, freeing the participant from responding to requests for data and alleviating security concerns since users do not directly access the participant's computers.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/5866e7bc-fc4b-455e-9586-3cde0cfe65f9","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/5866e7bc-fc4b-455e-9586-3cde0cfe65f9/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_547f5ed9e4b09357f06013f3","keyword":["Abundance (organisms)","Aquatic animals","Aquatic environments","Aquatic habitats","Arctic Ocean","Atlantic Ocean","Biocomplexity","Biodiversity","Bivalves","Caribbean Sea","Fishery management","Gulf of Maine","Gulf of Mexico","Marine Invertbrates","Marine ecosystems","Marine mollusks","North America","OBIS","Ocean Biogeographic Information System","Pacific Ocean","Puget Sound","South Atlantic Bight","USGS:547f5ed9e4b09357f06013f3","United States","benthic habitat","biogeography","coastal habitat","reef habitat"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-28T00:46:03.076976","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"bivalvia-subset-of-ocean-biogeographic-information-system-obis-usa-dataset-collection-for-","spatial_centroid":{"lat":37.512,"lon":-35.9899999994},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-179.929999999,11.9],[-179.929999999,75.93],[179.92,75.93],[179.92,11.9],[-179.929999999,11.9]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Bivalvia Subset of Ocean Biogeographic Information System (OBIS) - USA Dataset Collection for NFHP Thematic Viewer 20141202","type":"dataset"},{"_score":44.18419,"_sort":[1790556162931,44.18419,0,"cd6351e2-4a0c-4b4d-8493-d623a6753ebe"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Anthony D'Amato","hasEmail":"mailto:casc-data@usgs.gov"},"description":"Montane forests and the species that live in them are vulnerable to climate change. This vulnerability presents a challenge to land managers who must prioritize areas for conservation and management under changing environmental conditions. Montane spruce-fir forests in New England illustrate this challenge. Forests of Abies balsamea and Picea rubra are predicted to shrink in size and recede to higher elevations as temperatures increase. Warm-adapted species from lower elevations are predicted to expand upward, changing valuable habitat. The goal of this project was to forecast future spruce-fir forest extent using the landscape model LANDIS-II and the ecosystem models PnET-II and Linkages under a combination of four global circulation model projections and two representative concentration pathways (RCP 4.5 and 8.5 from CMIP5) for the Green Mountains National Forest (GMNF) in Vermont, USA. In this work we tested whether spruce-fir forest extent shrinks as expected and identified where spruce-fir persists as potential climate refugia for conservation. The success of our models depended on the use of detailed forest composition maps (30 m cells) and climate data that was downscaled to fine spatial resolutions (800 m cells), as montane forests are locally rare and the environmental conditions that drive their distribution are averaged out at coarser resolutions. Fine-scale landscape simulations successfully identified potential climate refugia for montane spruce-fir forests. Researchers on this project worked with members of the U.S. Forest Service, the U.S. National Forests, and other agencies to create realistic simulations that best prioritize areas for conservation and future management.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P13HFH68","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.5a5d1935e4b06e28e9bcd276.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_5a5d1935e4b06e28e9bcd276","keyword":["Green Mountains National Forest","USGS:5a5d1935e4b06e28e9bcd276","Vermont","biota","ecological processes","environment","natural resource management"],"modified":"2026-09-25T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-73.3324, 42.6975, -72.6485, 44.2107","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Forecast Changes in Forest Dominance Class in the Green Mountains National Forest VT Under Different Climate Change Projections"},"description":"Montane forests and the species that live in them are vulnerable to climate change. This vulnerability presents a challenge to land managers who must prioritize areas for conservation and management under changing environmental conditions. Montane spruce-fir forests in New England illustrate this challenge. Forests of Abies balsamea and Picea rubra are predicted to shrink in size and recede to higher elevations as temperatures increase. Warm-adapted species from lower elevations are predicted to expand upward, changing valuable habitat. The goal of this project was to forecast future spruce-fir forest extent using the landscape model LANDIS-II and the ecosystem models PnET-II and Linkages under a combination of four global circulation model projections and two representative concentration pathways (RCP 4.5 and 8.5 from CMIP5) for the Green Mountains National Forest (GMNF) in Vermont, USA. In this work we tested whether spruce-fir forest extent shrinks as expected and identified where spruce-fir persists as potential climate refugia for conservation. The success of our models depended on the use of detailed forest composition maps (30 m cells) and climate data that was downscaled to fine spatial resolutions (800 m cells), as montane forests are locally rare and the environmental conditions that drive their distribution are averaged out at coarser resolutions. Fine-scale landscape simulations successfully identified potential climate refugia for montane spruce-fir forests. Researchers on this project worked with members of the U.S. Forest Service, the U.S. National Forests, and other agencies to create realistic simulations that best prioritize areas for conservation and future management.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/8ce514e9-340e-454e-b650-6fddfb8c782b","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/8ce514e9-340e-454e-b650-6fddfb8c782b/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_5a5d1935e4b06e28e9bcd276","keyword":["Green Mountains National Forest","USGS:5a5d1935e4b06e28e9bcd276","Vermont","biota","ecological processes","environment","natural resource management"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-28T00:42:42.931424","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"forecast-changes-in-forest-dominance-class-in-the-green-mountains-national-forest-vt-under-67447","spatial_centroid":{"lat":43.30278,"lon":-73.05884},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-73.3324,42.6975],[-73.3324,44.2107],[-72.6485,44.2107],[-72.6485,42.6975],[-73.3324,42.6975]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Forecast Changes in Forest Dominance Class in the Green Mountains National Forest VT Under Different Climate Change Projections","type":"dataset"},{"_score":24.599934,"_sort":[1790556062247,24.599934,0,"b7b18799-43b8-417b-8940-7194d82706bc"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Ethan Plunkett","hasEmail":"mailto:eplunkett@eco.umass.edu"},"description":"This package contains results from the Designing Sustainable Landscapes (DSL) Species Refugia project for American woodcock. The following files are included:\n1. Raster of Landscape Capability (LC) for AMWO (American woodcock)\n2. Raster of Climate Refugia (CRefugia) for AMWO (American woodcock)\n3. Polygon shapefile of all cores for AMWO (American woodcock)\n4. Conductance among 2020 cores for AMWO (American woodcock)\n5. Conductance among 2080 cores for AMWO (American woodcock)","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://landeco.umass.edu/web/lcc/dsl/refugia/species_refugia_amwo.zip","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.6aa83a7d1ba49b9871468ac7.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6aa83a7d1ba49b9871468ac7","keyword":["Connecticut","Delaware","District of Columbia","Maine","Maryland","Massachusetts","New Hampshire","New Jersey","New York","North America","Pennsylvania","Rhode Island","USGS:6aa83a7d1ba49b9871468ac7","United States","Vermont","Virginia","West Virginia","biota","climate change","environment","geospatial datasets"],"modified":"2026-09-25T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-83.8015, 34.4437, -65.8410, 49.4647","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Current condition and refugia conservation cores for American woodcock and conductance among them"},"description":"This package contains results from the Designing Sustainable Landscapes (DSL) Species Refugia project for American woodcock. The following files are included:\n1. Raster of Landscape Capability (LC) for AMWO (American woodcock)\n2. Raster of Climate Refugia (CRefugia) for AMWO (American woodcock)\n3. Polygon shapefile of all cores for AMWO (American woodcock)\n4. Conductance among 2020 cores for AMWO (American woodcock)\n5. Conductance among 2080 cores for AMWO (American woodcock)","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/6774eced-8581-4bb0-be39-f088cb5ae198","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/6774eced-8581-4bb0-be39-f088cb5ae198/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6aa83a7d1ba49b9871468ac7","keyword":["Connecticut","Delaware","District of Columbia","Maine","Maryland","Massachusetts","New Hampshire","New Jersey","New York","North America","Pennsylvania","Rhode Island","USGS:6aa83a7d1ba49b9871468ac7","United States","Vermont","Virginia","West Virginia","biota","climate change","environment","geospatial datasets"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-28T00:41:02.247741","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"current-condition-and-refugia-conservation-cores-for-american-woodcock-and-conductance-amo","spatial_centroid":{"lat":40.4521,"lon":-76.6173},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-83.8015,34.4437],[-83.8015,49.4647],[-65.841,49.4647],[-65.841,34.4437],[-83.8015,34.4437]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Current condition and refugia conservation cores for American woodcock and conductance among them","type":"dataset"},{"_score":44.587254,"_sort":[1790555964264,44.587254,0,"902b0c60-b6ff-4d0b-9122-ccf1e8a93e56"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Anthony D'Amato","hasEmail":"mailto:casc-data@usgs.gov"},"description":"Montane forests and the species that live in them are vulnerable to climate change. This vulnerability presents a challenge to land managers who must prioritize areas for conservation and management under changing environmental conditions. Montane spruce-fir forests in New England illustrate this challenge. Forests of Abies balsamea and Picea rubra are predicted to shrink in size and recede to higher elevations as temperatures increase. Warm-adapted species from lower elevations are predicted to expand upward, changing valuable habitat. The goal of this project was to forecast future spruce-fir forest extent using the landscape model LANDIS-II and the ecosystem models PnET-II and Linkages under a combination of four global circulation model projections and two representative concentration pathways (RCP 4.5 and 8.5 from CMIP5) for the Green Mountains National Forest (GMNF) in Vermont, USA. In this work we tested whether spruce-fir forest extent shrinks as expected and identified where spruce-fir persists as potential climate refugia for conservation. The success of our models depended on the use of detailed forest composition maps (30 m cells) and climate data that was downscaled to fine spatial resolutions (800 m cells), as montane forests are locally rare and the environmental conditions that drive their distribution are averaged out at coarser resolutions. Fine-scale landscape simulations successfully identified potential climate refugia for montane spruce-fir forests. Researchers on this project worked with members of the U.S. Forest Service, the U.S. National Forests, and other agencies to create realistic simulations that best prioritize areas for conservation and future management.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P13HFH68","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.5a577c8ae4b01e7be245ccc4.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_5a577c8ae4b01e7be245ccc4","keyword":["Green Mountains National Forest","USGS:5a577c8ae4b01e7be245ccc4","Vermont","biota","ecological processes","environment","natural resource management"],"modified":"2026-09-25T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-73.3324, 42.6975, -72.6485, 44.2107","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Forecast Changes in Forest Dominance Class in the Green Mountains National Forest VT Under Different Climate Change Projections"},"description":"Montane forests and the species that live in them are vulnerable to climate change. This vulnerability presents a challenge to land managers who must prioritize areas for conservation and management under changing environmental conditions. Montane spruce-fir forests in New England illustrate this challenge. Forests of Abies balsamea and Picea rubra are predicted to shrink in size and recede to higher elevations as temperatures increase. Warm-adapted species from lower elevations are predicted to expand upward, changing valuable habitat. The goal of this project was to forecast future spruce-fir forest extent using the landscape model LANDIS-II and the ecosystem models PnET-II and Linkages under a combination of four global circulation model projections and two representative concentration pathways (RCP 4.5 and 8.5 from CMIP5) for the Green Mountains National Forest (GMNF) in Vermont, USA. In this work we tested whether spruce-fir forest extent shrinks as expected and identified where spruce-fir persists as potential climate refugia for conservation. The success of our models depended on the use of detailed forest composition maps (30 m cells) and climate data that was downscaled to fine spatial resolutions (800 m cells), as montane forests are locally rare and the environmental conditions that drive their distribution are averaged out at coarser resolutions. Fine-scale landscape simulations successfully identified potential climate refugia for montane spruce-fir forests. Researchers on this project worked with members of the U.S. Forest Service, the U.S. National Forests, and other agencies to create realistic simulations that best prioritize areas for conservation and future management.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/c0a4c598-617f-4f71-bc6f-2054d1820e57","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/c0a4c598-617f-4f71-bc6f-2054d1820e57/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_5a577c8ae4b01e7be245ccc4","keyword":["Green Mountains National Forest","USGS:5a577c8ae4b01e7be245ccc4","Vermont","biota","ecological processes","environment","natural resource management"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-28T00:39:24.264515","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"forecast-changes-in-forest-dominance-class-in-the-green-mountains-national-forest-vt-under-71eb7","spatial_centroid":{"lat":43.30278,"lon":-73.05884},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-73.3324,42.6975],[-73.3324,44.2107],[-72.6485,44.2107],[-72.6485,42.6975],[-73.3324,42.6975]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Forecast Changes in Forest Dominance Class in the Green Mountains National Forest VT Under Different Climate Change Projections","type":"dataset"},{"_score":44.18419,"_sort":[1790555640138,44.18419,0,"03d1bb94-9739-4d45-b9fc-9783c72861c2"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Anthony D'Amato","hasEmail":"mailto:casc-data@usgs.gov"},"description":"Montane forests and the species that live in them are vulnerable to climate change. This vulnerability presents a challenge to land managers who must prioritize areas for conservation and management under changing environmental conditions. Montane spruce-fir forests in New England illustrate this challenge. Forests of Abies balsamea and Picea rubra are predicted to shrink in size and recede to higher elevations as temperatures increase. Warm-adapted species from lower elevations are predicted to expand upward, changing valuable habitat. The goal of this project was to forecast future spruce-fir forest extent using the landscape model LANDIS-II and the ecosystem models PnET-II and Linkages under a combination of four global circulation model projections and two representative concentration pathways (RCP 4.5 and 8.5 from CMIP5) for the Green Mountains National Forest (GMNF) in Vermont, USA. In this work we tested whether spruce-fir forest extent shrinks as expected and identified where spruce-fir persists as potential climate refugia for conservation. The success of our models depended on the use of detailed forest composition maps (30 m cells) and climate data that was downscaled to fine spatial resolutions (800 m cells), as montane forests are locally rare and the environmental conditions that drive their distribution are averaged out at coarser resolutions. Fine-scale landscape simulations successfully identified potential climate refugia for montane spruce-fir forests. Researchers on this project worked with members of the U.S. Forest Service, the U.S. National Forests, and other agencies to create realistic simulations that best prioritize areas for conservation and future management.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P13HFH68","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.5a5cddbde4b06e28e9bcd272.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_5a5cddbde4b06e28e9bcd272","keyword":["Green Mountains National Forest","USGS:5a5cddbde4b06e28e9bcd272","Vermont","biota","ecological processes","environment","natural resource management"],"modified":"2026-09-25T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-73.3324, 42.6975, -72.6485, 44.2107","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Forecast Changes in Forest Dominance Class in the Green Mountains National Forest VT Under Different Climate Change Projections"},"description":"Montane forests and the species that live in them are vulnerable to climate change. This vulnerability presents a challenge to land managers who must prioritize areas for conservation and management under changing environmental conditions. Montane spruce-fir forests in New England illustrate this challenge. Forests of Abies balsamea and Picea rubra are predicted to shrink in size and recede to higher elevations as temperatures increase. Warm-adapted species from lower elevations are predicted to expand upward, changing valuable habitat. The goal of this project was to forecast future spruce-fir forest extent using the landscape model LANDIS-II and the ecosystem models PnET-II and Linkages under a combination of four global circulation model projections and two representative concentration pathways (RCP 4.5 and 8.5 from CMIP5) for the Green Mountains National Forest (GMNF) in Vermont, USA. In this work we tested whether spruce-fir forest extent shrinks as expected and identified where spruce-fir persists as potential climate refugia for conservation. The success of our models depended on the use of detailed forest composition maps (30 m cells) and climate data that was downscaled to fine spatial resolutions (800 m cells), as montane forests are locally rare and the environmental conditions that drive their distribution are averaged out at coarser resolutions. Fine-scale landscape simulations successfully identified potential climate refugia for montane spruce-fir forests. Researchers on this project worked with members of the U.S. Forest Service, the U.S. National Forests, and other agencies to create realistic simulations that best prioritize areas for conservation and future management.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/8160264e-b129-468d-85d6-cda748b94e17","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/8160264e-b129-468d-85d6-cda748b94e17/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_5a5cddbde4b06e28e9bcd272","keyword":["Green Mountains National Forest","USGS:5a5cddbde4b06e28e9bcd272","Vermont","biota","ecological processes","environment","natural resource management"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-28T00:34:00.138231","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"forecast-changes-in-forest-dominance-class-in-the-green-mountains-national-forest-vt-under-826e8","spatial_centroid":{"lat":43.30278,"lon":-73.05884},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-73.3324,42.6975],[-73.3324,44.2107],[-72.6485,44.2107],[-72.6485,42.6975],[-73.3324,42.6975]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Forecast Changes in Forest Dominance Class in the Green Mountains National Forest VT Under Different Climate Change Projections","type":"dataset"},{"_score":55.198338,"_sort":[1790554967138,55.198338,0,"52439cf1-48e6-48fc-b3ad-e3b253265abb"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Anthony D'Amato","hasEmail":"mailto:casc-data@usgs.gov"},"description":"Montane forests and the species that live in them are vulnerable to climate change. This vulnerability presents a challenge to land managers who must prioritize areas for conservation and management under changing environmental conditions. Montane spruce-fir forests in New England illustrate this challenge. Forests of Abies balsamea and Picea rubra are predicted to shrink in size and recede to higher elevations as temperatures increase. Warm-adapted species from lower elevations are predicted to expand upward, changing valuable habitat. The goal of this project was to forecast future spruce-fir forest extent using the landscape model LANDIS-II and the ecosystem models PnET-II and Linkages under a combination of four global circulation model projections and two representative concentration pathways (RCP 4.5 and 8.5 from CMIP5) for the Green Mountains National Forest (GMNF) in Vermont, USA. In this work we tested whether spruce-fir forest extent shrinks as expected and identified where spruce-fir persists as potential climate refugia for conservation. The success of our models depended on the use of detailed forest composition maps (30 m cells) and climate data that was downscaled to fine spatial resolutions (800 m cells), as montane forests are locally rare and the environmental conditions that drive their distribution are averaged out at coarser resolutions. Fine-scale landscape simulations successfully identified potential climate refugia for montane spruce-fir forests. Researchers on this project worked with members of the U.S. Forest Service, the U.S. National Forests, and other agencies to create realistic simulations that best prioritize areas for conservation and future management.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P13HFH68","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.584f00eee4b0260a373819de.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_584f00eee4b0260a373819de","keyword":["Green Mountains National Forest","USGS:584f00eee4b0260a373819de","Vermont","biota","climate change","ecological processes","environment","external research support","geospatial datasets","modeling","natural resource management"],"modified":"2026-09-25T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-73.3324, 42.6975, -72.6485, 44.2107","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Forecast Changes in Forest Dominance Class in the Green Mountains National Forest VT Under Future Climate Projections"},"description":"Montane forests and the species that live in them are vulnerable to climate change. This vulnerability presents a challenge to land managers who must prioritize areas for conservation and management under changing environmental conditions. Montane spruce-fir forests in New England illustrate this challenge. Forests of Abies balsamea and Picea rubra are predicted to shrink in size and recede to higher elevations as temperatures increase. Warm-adapted species from lower elevations are predicted to expand upward, changing valuable habitat. The goal of this project was to forecast future spruce-fir forest extent using the landscape model LANDIS-II and the ecosystem models PnET-II and Linkages under a combination of four global circulation model projections and two representative concentration pathways (RCP 4.5 and 8.5 from CMIP5) for the Green Mountains National Forest (GMNF) in Vermont, USA. In this work we tested whether spruce-fir forest extent shrinks as expected and identified where spruce-fir persists as potential climate refugia for conservation. The success of our models depended on the use of detailed forest composition maps (30 m cells) and climate data that was downscaled to fine spatial resolutions (800 m cells), as montane forests are locally rare and the environmental conditions that drive their distribution are averaged out at coarser resolutions. Fine-scale landscape simulations successfully identified potential climate refugia for montane spruce-fir forests. Researchers on this project worked with members of the U.S. Forest Service, the U.S. National Forests, and other agencies to create realistic simulations that best prioritize areas for conservation and future management.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/cf6911bb-aed1-46af-bfee-b095780cff53","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/cf6911bb-aed1-46af-bfee-b095780cff53/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_584f00eee4b0260a373819de","keyword":["Green Mountains National Forest","USGS:584f00eee4b0260a373819de","Vermont","biota","climate change","ecological processes","environment","external research support","geospatial datasets","modeling","natural resource management"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-28T00:22:47.138548","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"forecast-changes-in-forest-dominance-class-in-the-green-mountains-national-forest-vt-under","spatial_centroid":{"lat":43.30278,"lon":-73.05884},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-73.3324,42.6975],[-73.3324,44.2107],[-72.6485,44.2107],[-72.6485,42.6975],[-73.3324,42.6975]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Forecast Changes in Forest Dominance Class in the Green Mountains National Forest VT Under Future Climate Projections","type":"dataset"},{"_score":25.343788,"_sort":[1790553896384,25.343788,0,"49cecdad-1dc5-4a35-b5f9-fad0ce47c7cc"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Michelle Staudinger","hasEmail":"mailto:mstaudinger@usgs.gov"},"description":"The timing of biological events in plants and animals, such as migration and reproduction, is shifting due to climate change. Anadromous fishes are particularly susceptible to these shifts, as they are subject to strong seasonal cycles when transitioning between marine and freshwater habitats to spawn. We used linear models to determine the extent of phenological shifts in adult alewife (Alosa pseudoharengus) as they migrated from ocean to freshwater environments during spring to spawn at 12 sites along the northeast U.S. We also evaluated broad-scale oceanic and atmospheric drivers that trigger their movements from offshore to inland habitats including sea surface temperature (SST), North Atlantic Oscillation index, and Gulf Stream Index.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P9TBIQVH","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.63d421cbd34e06fef150ea59.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_63d421cbd34e06fef150ea59","keyword":["Massachusetts","Massachusetts River","USGS:63d421cbd34e06fef150ea59","climate change","fish","migration (organisms)","phenology"],"modified":"2026-09-25T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-72.1362, 40.9716, -69.6094, 43.2452","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Massachusetts River Herring Daily Counts and Environmental data"},"description":"The timing of biological events in plants and animals, such as migration and reproduction, is shifting due to climate change. Anadromous fishes are particularly susceptible to these shifts, as they are subject to strong seasonal cycles when transitioning between marine and freshwater habitats to spawn. We used linear models to determine the extent of phenological shifts in adult alewife (Alosa pseudoharengus) as they migrated from ocean to freshwater environments during spring to spawn at 12 sites along the northeast U.S. We also evaluated broad-scale oceanic and atmospheric drivers that trigger their movements from offshore to inland habitats including sea surface temperature (SST), North Atlantic Oscillation index, and Gulf Stream Index.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/0598692b-4286-437e-ab30-d90a520ecf8b","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/0598692b-4286-437e-ab30-d90a520ecf8b/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_63d421cbd34e06fef150ea59","keyword":["Massachusetts","Massachusetts River","USGS:63d421cbd34e06fef150ea59","climate change","fish","migration (organisms)","phenology"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-28T00:04:56.384192","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"massachusetts-river-herring-daily-counts-and-environmental-data","spatial_centroid":{"lat":41.88104,"lon":-71.12548},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-72.1362,40.9716],[-72.1362,43.2452],[-69.6094,43.2452],[-69.6094,40.9716],[-72.1362,40.9716]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Massachusetts River Herring Daily Counts and Environmental data","type":"dataset"},{"_score":30.02361,"_sort":[1790541449941,30.02361,0,"bf3a3305-4a6e-4f66-b568-f18bfd6eedaf"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"@type":"dcat:Dataset","accessLevel":"public","contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"USEPA","hasEmail":"mailto:comeleo.randy@epa.gov"},"describedByType":"application/octet-stream","description":"Originators: US Environmental Protection Agency Publisher: US EPA Office of Research &amp; Development (ORD) - National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory (NHEERL) Publication place: Corvallis, OR Publication date: Time Period of Data: 1900-2010; Projected data for 2041-2070. Data location: GeoPlatform (\"https://www.geoplatform.gov/\") and EPA Environmental Dataset Gateway (https://edg.epa.gov/). Abstract: We apply the hydrologic landscapes (HL) concept to assess the hydrologic vulnerability of the western United States (U.S.) to projected climate conditions. Our goal is to understand the potential impacts for stakeholder-defined interests across large geographic areas. The basic assumption of the HL approach is that catchments that share similar physical and climatic characteristics are expected to have similar hydrologic characteristics. We map climate vulnerability by integrating the HL approach into a retrospective analysis of historical data to assess variability in future climate projections and hydrology, which includes temperature, precipitation, potential evapotranspiration, snow accumulation, climatic moisture, surplus water, and seasonality of water surplus. Projections that are not within two-standard deviations of the historical decadal average contribute to the vulnerability index for each metric. The resulting vulnerability maps show that temperature and potential evapotranspiration are consistently projected to have high vulnerability indices for the western U.S. Precipitation vulnerability is not as spatially-uniform as temperature. The highest elevation areas with snow are projected to experience significant changes in snow accumulation. The seasonality vulnerability map shows that specific mountainous areas in the West are most prone to changes in seasonality, whereas many transitional terrains are moderately susceptible. This paper illustrates how the HL approach can help assess climatic and hydrologic vulnerability across large spatial scales. By combining the HL concept and climate vulnerability analyses, we provide a planning approach that could allow resource managers to consider how future climate conditions may impact important economic and conservation resources. Purpose: These data were created in support of the US EPA\u2019s ACE CIVA 2.3, Task Project (QAPP: E-WED-0030854). However, these climate data and hydrologic landscape summaries should have broad applicability for hydrological, geomorphic, or ecological modeling, management, and restoration. This raster contains the modeled change in the average Feddema Moisture Index between the 2041-2070 modeled data (specified in the title) relative to the 1971-2000 Normal period.","distribution":[],"identifier":"https://edg.epa.gov/WAFer_harvest/ISO/ord-geo-repository_WdF_inmcm4.tif.xml","issued":"2020-01-10T00:00:00.000+00:00","keyword":["Arizona","California","Idaho","Nevada","Oregon","Washington","Climate","Environment","Ground Water","Natural Resources","Water","020:094","Downloadable Data"],"language":[],"license":"https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","modified":"2020-01-10T00:00:00.000+00:00","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"USEPA"},"spatial":"-108.071872,29.335308,-127.854174,50.664713","temporal":"1971-01-01T00:00:00+00:00/2010-12-31T00:00:00+00:00","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Modeled change in the average Feddema Moisture Index (multiplied by 1000) between the modeled 2041-2070 period (INM-CM4 r1i1p1 model) and the 1971-2000 Normal period."},"description":"Originators: US Environmental Protection Agency Publisher: US EPA Office of Research &amp; Development (ORD) - National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory (NHEERL) Publication place: Corvallis, OR Publication date: Time Period of Data: 1900-2010; Projected data for 2041-2070. Data location: GeoPlatform (\"https://www.geoplatform.gov/\") and EPA Environmental Dataset Gateway (https://edg.epa.gov/). Abstract: We apply the hydrologic landscapes (HL) concept to assess the hydrologic vulnerability of the western United States (U.S.) to projected climate conditions. Our goal is to understand the potential impacts for stakeholder-defined interests across large geographic areas. The basic assumption of the HL approach is that catchments that share similar physical and climatic characteristics are expected to have similar hydrologic characteristics. We map climate vulnerability by integrating the HL approach into a retrospective analysis of historical data to assess variability in future climate projections and hydrology, which includes temperature, precipitation, potential evapotranspiration, snow accumulation, climatic moisture, surplus water, and seasonality of water surplus. Projections that are not within two-standard deviations of the historical decadal average contribute to the vulnerability index for each metric. The resulting vulnerability maps show that temperature and potential evapotranspiration are consistently projected to have high vulnerability indices for the western U.S. Precipitation vulnerability is not as spatially-uniform as temperature. The highest elevation areas with snow are projected to experience significant changes in snow accumulation. The seasonality vulnerability map shows that specific mountainous areas in the West are most prone to changes in seasonality, whereas many transitional terrains are moderately susceptible. This paper illustrates how the HL approach can help assess climatic and hydrologic vulnerability across large spatial scales. By combining the HL concept and climate vulnerability analyses, we provide a planning approach that could allow resource managers to consider how future climate conditions may impact important economic and conservation resources. Purpose: These data were created in support of the US EPA\u2019s ACE CIVA 2.3, Task Project (QAPP: E-WED-0030854). However, these climate data and hydrologic landscape summaries should have broad applicability for hydrological, geomorphic, or ecological modeling, management, and restoration. This raster contains the modeled change in the average Feddema Moisture Index between the 2041-2070 modeled data (specified in the title) relative to the 1971-2000 Normal period.","distribution_titles":[],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/418a91b0-451f-4700-bdb4-10f71a452368","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/418a91b0-451f-4700-bdb4-10f71a452368/raw","harvest_record_transformed":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/418a91b0-451f-4700-bdb4-10f71a452368/transformed","has_download":false,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"https://edg.epa.gov/WAFer_harvest/ISO/ord-geo-repository_WdF_inmcm4.tif.xml","keyword":["Arizona","California","Idaho","Nevada","Oregon","Washington","Climate","Environment","Ground Water","Natural Resources","Water","020:094","Downloadable Data"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T20:37:29.941113","organization":{"aliases":["EPA"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"82b85475-f85d-404a-b95b-89d1a42e9f6b","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/epa.png","name":"U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"epa"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"USEPA","slug":"modeled-change-in-the-average-feddema-moisture-index-multiplied-by-1000-between-the-modele-78993","spatial_centroid":{"lat":37.86707,"lon":-115.9847928},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-108.071872,29.335308],[-108.071872,50.664713],[-127.854174,50.664713],[-127.854174,29.335308],[-108.071872,29.335308]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Modeled change in the average Feddema Moisture Index (multiplied by 1000) between the modeled 2041-2070 period (INM-CM4 r1i1p1 model) and the 1971-2000 Normal period.","type":"dataset"},{"_score":23.39358,"_sort":[1790472830505,23.39358,0,"63e3d628-2a5f-4e97-a704-8805ede4aa45"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Climate Adaptation Science Center","hasEmail":"mailto:casc-data@usgs.gov"},"description":"Winter climate change has the potential to have a large impact on coastal wetlands in the southeastern U.S. Warmer winter temperatures and reductions in the intensity of freeze events would likely lead to mangrove forest range expansion and salt marsh displacement in parts of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic coast. The objective of this research was to better understand some of the ecological implications of mangrove forest migration and salt marsh displacement. The potential ecological effects of mangrove migration are diverse ranging from important biotic impacts (e.g., coastal fisheries, land bird migration; colonial nesting wading birds) to ecosystem stability (e.g., response to sea level rise and drought; habitat loss; coastal protection) to biogeochemical processes (e.g., carbon storage; water quality). In this research, our focus was on the impact of mangrove forest migration on coastal wetland soil processes and the consequent implications for coastal wetland responses to sea level rise, ecosystem resilience, and carbon storage. Our study specifically addressed the following questions: (1) How do ecological processes and ecosystem properties differ between salt marshes and mangrove forests; (2) As mangrove forests develop, how do their ecosystem properties change and how do these properties compare to salt marshes; (3) How do plant-soil interactions across mangrove forest structural gradients differ among three distinct locations that span the northern Gulf of Mexico; and (4) What are the implications of mangrove forest encroachment and development into salt marsh in terms of soil development, carbon and nitrogen storage, and soil strength? To address these questions, we utilized the salt marshes and natural mangrove forest structural gradients present at three distinct locations in the northern Gulf of Mexico: Cedar Key (Florida), Port Fourchon (Louisiana), and Port Aransas (Texas). Each of these locations represents a distinct combination of climate-driven abiotic conditions. We quantified relationships between plant community composition and structure, soil and porewater physicochemical properties, hydroperiod, and climatic conditions. The suite of measurements that we collected provide initial insights into how different geographic areas of an ecotone, with different environmental conditions, may be impacted by mangrove forest expansion and development, and how these changes may alter the supply of specific ecosystem goods and services. This file includes the site-level elevation data.\nThis work was conducted via a collaborative effort between scientists at the U.S. Geological Survey National Wetland Research Center and the Department of Biology of the University of Louisiana at Lafayette.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P1GDTXUR","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.545cfdb9e4b0ba8303f713e7.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_545cfdb9e4b0ba8303f713e7","keyword":["USGS:545cfdb9e4b0ba8303f713e7","climate change","coastal","elevation","range shift","wetlands"],"modified":"2026-09-22T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Site Level Elevation Collection Data"},"description":"Winter climate change has the potential to have a large impact on coastal wetlands in the southeastern U.S. Warmer winter temperatures and reductions in the intensity of freeze events would likely lead to mangrove forest range expansion and salt marsh displacement in parts of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic coast. The objective of this research was to better understand some of the ecological implications of mangrove forest migration and salt marsh displacement. The potential ecological effects of mangrove migration are diverse ranging from important biotic impacts (e.g., coastal fisheries, land bird migration; colonial nesting wading birds) to ecosystem stability (e.g., response to sea level rise and drought; habitat loss; coastal protection) to biogeochemical processes (e.g., carbon storage; water quality). In this research, our focus was on the impact of mangrove forest migration on coastal wetland soil processes and the consequent implications for coastal wetland responses to sea level rise, ecosystem resilience, and carbon storage. Our study specifically addressed the following questions: (1) How do ecological processes and ecosystem properties differ between salt marshes and mangrove forests; (2) As mangrove forests develop, how do their ecosystem properties change and how do these properties compare to salt marshes; (3) How do plant-soil interactions across mangrove forest structural gradients differ among three distinct locations that span the northern Gulf of Mexico; and (4) What are the implications of mangrove forest encroachment and development into salt marsh in terms of soil development, carbon and nitrogen storage, and soil strength? To address these questions, we utilized the salt marshes and natural mangrove forest structural gradients present at three distinct locations in the northern Gulf of Mexico: Cedar Key (Florida), Port Fourchon (Louisiana), and Port Aransas (Texas). Each of these locations represents a distinct combination of climate-driven abiotic conditions. We quantified relationships between plant community composition and structure, soil and porewater physicochemical properties, hydroperiod, and climatic conditions. The suite of measurements that we collected provide initial insights into how different geographic areas of an ecotone, with different environmental conditions, may be impacted by mangrove forest expansion and development, and how these changes may alter the supply of specific ecosystem goods and services. This file includes the site-level elevation data.\nThis work was conducted via a collaborative effort between scientists at the U.S. Geological Survey National Wetland Research Center and the Department of Biology of the University of Louisiana at Lafayette.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/cc23b262-c377-48aa-aa35-9763db0eed9b","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/cc23b262-c377-48aa-aa35-9763db0eed9b/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_545cfdb9e4b0ba8303f713e7","keyword":["USGS:545cfdb9e4b0ba8303f713e7","climate change","coastal","elevation","range shift","wetlands"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T01:33:50.505839","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"site-level-elevation-collection-data","spatial_centroid":null,"spatial_shape":null,"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Site Level Elevation Collection Data","type":"dataset"},{"_score":8.932343,"_sort":[1790472756481,8.932343,0,"d2a41847-8a2e-4d32-b875-f8b738c3d850"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Jacob A Fleck","hasEmail":"mailto:jafleck@usgs.gov"},"description":"Little is known about mercury concentrations at bay margins, and how climate change, including changes in temperature and precipitation, will affect mercury exposure and methylmercury (MeHg) production. In addition, the San Francisco South Bay Salt Ponds Restoration Program (SBSPRP) needs more efficient and effective mercury monitoring approaches at larger spatial scales to understand changes in mercury at a regional level. The goal of this new project, a collaboration between the USGS Western Geographic Science Center, Water Mission Area, and the California Water Science Center (CAWSC), is to develop the capacity to map total mercury (THg) and MeHg in South San Francisco Bay (SFB) through the satellite remote sensing (Sentinel-2) of two known mercury indicators: total suspended solids (TSS) and colored dissolved organic matter (CDOM). In addition to quantifying the accuracy of this approach, this research aims in South SFB using the Sentinel-2 satellite in order to 1) improve understanding of region-wide mercury spatial and temporal trends associated with weather events and wetland restoration management activities, and 2) improve mercury monitoring efficiencies and capabilities moving forward. One main project objective is to assess the capacity to detect anomalies in remotely sensed TSS, CDOM, and mercury species associated with recent weather events or restoration activities through time series analysis.  \nThe optical measurements reported here were collected to aid in the characterization of water sources and mixtures and establish proxies (surrogates) for mercury and methylmercury concentrations and to provide ground-truthing for remotely sensed models of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations. Data are compiled into five tables: 1) full fluorescence spectra in vectorized format (LSB_Hg_RS_EEMs_vectors.csv), 2) full absorbance spectra for 1 centimeter (cm) path measurements (LSB_Hg_RS_1cm_ABS_scans.csv), 3) full absorbance spectra for 10 cm path measurements (SSFB_Hg_RS_10cm_ABS_scans.csv), 4) absorption coefficients derived from the 10cm path measurements (SSFB_Hg_RS_10cm_ag_scans.csv), and 5) summary file of commonly extracted optical indicators and calculated wavelength-array values derived from the optical data that correspond to arrays measured by field-based sensors for use in statistical analyses and model development (LSB_Hg_RS_OMRL_Sample_Summary.csv).","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P13JOXXA","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.6a1f4a72b66b018da518f7ee.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6a1f4a72b66b018da518f7ee","keyword":["Absorbance","Aqualog","Dissolved Organic Matter","Fluorescence","Hydrology","USGS:6a1f4a72b66b018da518f7ee","Water Quality","environment","geoscientificInformation"],"modified":"2026-09-22T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-122.4200, 37.4000, -121.9000, 37.6400","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Optical measurements for surface water samples collected within South San Francisco Bay in support of mercury modeling"},"description":"Little is known about mercury concentrations at bay margins, and how climate change, including changes in temperature and precipitation, will affect mercury exposure and methylmercury (MeHg) production. In addition, the San Francisco South Bay Salt Ponds Restoration Program (SBSPRP) needs more efficient and effective mercury monitoring approaches at larger spatial scales to understand changes in mercury at a regional level. The goal of this new project, a collaboration between the USGS Western Geographic Science Center, Water Mission Area, and the California Water Science Center (CAWSC), is to develop the capacity to map total mercury (THg) and MeHg in South San Francisco Bay (SFB) through the satellite remote sensing (Sentinel-2) of two known mercury indicators: total suspended solids (TSS) and colored dissolved organic matter (CDOM). In addition to quantifying the accuracy of this approach, this research aims in South SFB using the Sentinel-2 satellite in order to 1) improve understanding of region-wide mercury spatial and temporal trends associated with weather events and wetland restoration management activities, and 2) improve mercury monitoring efficiencies and capabilities moving forward. One main project objective is to assess the capacity to detect anomalies in remotely sensed TSS, CDOM, and mercury species associated with recent weather events or restoration activities through time series analysis.  \nThe optical measurements reported here were collected to aid in the characterization of water sources and mixtures and establish proxies (surrogates) for mercury and methylmercury concentrations and to provide ground-truthing for remotely sensed models of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations. Data are compiled into five tables: 1) full fluorescence spectra in vectorized format (LSB_Hg_RS_EEMs_vectors.csv), 2) full absorbance spectra for 1 centimeter (cm) path measurements (LSB_Hg_RS_1cm_ABS_scans.csv), 3) full absorbance spectra for 10 cm path measurements (SSFB_Hg_RS_10cm_ABS_scans.csv), 4) absorption coefficients derived from the 10cm path measurements (SSFB_Hg_RS_10cm_ag_scans.csv), and 5) summary file of commonly extracted optical indicators and calculated wavelength-array values derived from the optical data that correspond to arrays measured by field-based sensors for use in statistical analyses and model development (LSB_Hg_RS_OMRL_Sample_Summary.csv).","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/15ca54a1-0bba-449c-add3-c77050e14527","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/15ca54a1-0bba-449c-add3-c77050e14527/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6a1f4a72b66b018da518f7ee","keyword":["Absorbance","Aqualog","Dissolved Organic Matter","Fluorescence","Hydrology","USGS:6a1f4a72b66b018da518f7ee","Water Quality","environment","geoscientificInformation"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T01:32:36.481698","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"optical-measurements-for-surface-water-samples-collected-within-south-san-francisco-bay-in","spatial_centroid":{"lat":37.495999999999995,"lon":-122.21200000000002},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-122.42,37.4],[-122.42,37.64],[-121.9,37.64],[-121.9,37.4],[-122.42,37.4]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Optical measurements for surface water samples collected within South San Francisco Bay in support of mercury modeling","type":"dataset"},{"_score":12.813107,"_sort":[1790472742953,12.813107,0,"2de4c217-bd1c-4956-a485-727d64cb6f41"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Michael Osland","hasEmail":"mailto:mosland@usgs.gov"},"description":"Winter climate change has the potential to have a large impact on coastal wetlands in the southeastern U.S. Warmer winter temperatures and reductions in the intensity of freeze events would likely lead to mangrove forest range expansion and salt marsh displacement in parts of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic coast. The objective of this research was to better understand some of the ecological implications of mangrove forest migration and salt marsh displacement. The potential ecological effects of mangrove migration are diverse ranging from important biotic impacts (e.g., coastal fisheries, land bird migration; colonial nesting wading birds) to ecosystem stability (e.g., response to sea level rise and drought; habitat loss; coastal protection) to biogeochemical processes (e.g., carbon storage; water quality). In this research, our focus was on the impact of mangrove forest migration on coastal wetland soil processes and the consequent implications for coastal wetland responses to sea level rise, ecosystem resilience, and carbon storage. Our study specifically addressed the following questions: (1) How do ecological processes and ecosystem properties differ between salt marshes and mangrove forests; (2) As mangrove forests develop, how do their ecosystem properties change and how do these properties compare to salt marshes; (3) How do plant-soil interactions across mangrove forest structural gradients differ among three distinct locations that span the northern Gulf of Mexico; and (4) What are the implications of mangrove forest encroachment and development into salt marsh in terms of soil development, carbon and nitrogen storage, and soil strength? To address these questions, we utilized the salt marshes and natural mangrove forest structural gradients present at three distinct locations in the northern Gulf of Mexico: Cedar Key (Florida), Port Fourchon (Louisiana), and Port Aransas (Texas). Each of these locations represents a distinct combination of climate-driven abiotic conditions. We quantified relationships between plant community composition and structure, soil and porewater physicochemical properties, hydroperiod, and climatic conditions. The suite of measurements that we collected provide initial insights into how different geographic areas of an ecotone, with different environmental conditions, may be impacted by mangrove forest expansion and development, and how these changes may alter the supply of specific ecosystem goods and services. This file includes the subplot-level porewater physicochemical data.\nThis work was conducted via a collaborative effort between scientists at the U.S. Geological Survey National Wetland Research Center and the Department of Biology of the University of Louisiana at Lafayette.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P1GDTXUR","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.545cfd67e4b0ba8303f713b3.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_545cfd67e4b0ba8303f713b3","keyword":["Cedar Key","Gulf of Mexico","Port Aransas","Port Fourchon","State of Florida","State of Louisiana","State of Texas","USGS:545cfd67e4b0ba8303f713b3","United States of America","conductivity","environment","pH","porewater","salinity","soil","temperature"],"modified":"2026-09-22T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-97.14012, 27.829952, -83.029848, 29.2","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Dataset 10: New porewater data collection: subplot-level physicochemical"},"description":"Winter climate change has the potential to have a large impact on coastal wetlands in the southeastern U.S. Warmer winter temperatures and reductions in the intensity of freeze events would likely lead to mangrove forest range expansion and salt marsh displacement in parts of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic coast. The objective of this research was to better understand some of the ecological implications of mangrove forest migration and salt marsh displacement. The potential ecological effects of mangrove migration are diverse ranging from important biotic impacts (e.g., coastal fisheries, land bird migration; colonial nesting wading birds) to ecosystem stability (e.g., response to sea level rise and drought; habitat loss; coastal protection) to biogeochemical processes (e.g., carbon storage; water quality). In this research, our focus was on the impact of mangrove forest migration on coastal wetland soil processes and the consequent implications for coastal wetland responses to sea level rise, ecosystem resilience, and carbon storage. Our study specifically addressed the following questions: (1) How do ecological processes and ecosystem properties differ between salt marshes and mangrove forests; (2) As mangrove forests develop, how do their ecosystem properties change and how do these properties compare to salt marshes; (3) How do plant-soil interactions across mangrove forest structural gradients differ among three distinct locations that span the northern Gulf of Mexico; and (4) What are the implications of mangrove forest encroachment and development into salt marsh in terms of soil development, carbon and nitrogen storage, and soil strength? To address these questions, we utilized the salt marshes and natural mangrove forest structural gradients present at three distinct locations in the northern Gulf of Mexico: Cedar Key (Florida), Port Fourchon (Louisiana), and Port Aransas (Texas). Each of these locations represents a distinct combination of climate-driven abiotic conditions. We quantified relationships between plant community composition and structure, soil and porewater physicochemical properties, hydroperiod, and climatic conditions. The suite of measurements that we collected provide initial insights into how different geographic areas of an ecotone, with different environmental conditions, may be impacted by mangrove forest expansion and development, and how these changes may alter the supply of specific ecosystem goods and services. This file includes the subplot-level porewater physicochemical data.\nThis work was conducted via a collaborative effort between scientists at the U.S. Geological Survey National Wetland Research Center and the Department of Biology of the University of Louisiana at Lafayette.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/dd14165e-9e54-4e6c-9b86-0632416be629","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/dd14165e-9e54-4e6c-9b86-0632416be629/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_545cfd67e4b0ba8303f713b3","keyword":["Cedar Key","Gulf of Mexico","Port Aransas","Port Fourchon","State of Florida","State of Louisiana","State of Texas","USGS:545cfd67e4b0ba8303f713b3","United States of America","conductivity","environment","pH","porewater","salinity","soil","temperature"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T01:32:22.953705","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"dataset-10-new-porewater-data-collection-subplot-level-physicochemical","spatial_centroid":{"lat":28.3779712,"lon":-91.4960112},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-97.14012,27.829952],[-97.14012,29.2],[-83.029848,29.2],[-83.029848,27.829952],[-97.14012,27.829952]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Dataset 10: New porewater data collection: subplot-level physicochemical","type":"dataset"},{"_score":21.17674,"_sort":[1790472707852,21.17674,0,"92f7c2e6-9df7-4648-b4ac-fb5207db235b"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Peter Caldwell, PhD","hasEmail":"mailto:pcaldwell02@fs.fed.us"},"description":"Stream flows are essential for maintaining healthy aquatic ecosystems and for supporting human water supply needs. Integrated modeling approaches assessing the impact of changes in climate, land use, and water withdrawals on stream flows and the subsequent impact of changes in flow regime on aquatic biota at multiple spatial scales are necessary to insure an adequate supply of water for humans and healthy river ecosystems. We compared streamflow predictions from a regional-scale hydrological model to those of several fine-scale SW models under a range of hypothetical climate change scenarios to determine the range of predicted streamflow responses to fixed climate perturbations.This spreadsheet contains the results of a study investigating the sensitivity of predicted discharge to changes in precipitation and temperature inputs for a coarse scale (WaSSI) and three fine scale (HSPF, SWAT, WaterFALL) hydrologic models at a single site (02347500, FLINT RIVER AT US 19, NEAR CARSONVILLE, GA) from 1981 to 1999. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of using regional and local scale models to identify unique areas of concern and understand fine scale hydrologic dynamics under climate change. Descriptions of the models and results of the study are detailed in the final report.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P14MMNBE","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.57641394e4b07657d19ba808.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_57641394e4b07657d19ba808","keyword":["ELOHA","USGS:57641394e4b07657d19ba808","calibration","ecosystem health","environmental flow","hydrologic models","uncertainty","water supply"],"modified":"2026-09-22T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-106.645782, 17.884190, -65.220856, 40.638554","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Regional to local coarse to fine scale global change impact study on flow"},"description":"Stream flows are essential for maintaining healthy aquatic ecosystems and for supporting human water supply needs. Integrated modeling approaches assessing the impact of changes in climate, land use, and water withdrawals on stream flows and the subsequent impact of changes in flow regime on aquatic biota at multiple spatial scales are necessary to insure an adequate supply of water for humans and healthy river ecosystems. We compared streamflow predictions from a regional-scale hydrological model to those of several fine-scale SW models under a range of hypothetical climate change scenarios to determine the range of predicted streamflow responses to fixed climate perturbations.This spreadsheet contains the results of a study investigating the sensitivity of predicted discharge to changes in precipitation and temperature inputs for a coarse scale (WaSSI) and three fine scale (HSPF, SWAT, WaterFALL) hydrologic models at a single site (02347500, FLINT RIVER AT US 19, NEAR CARSONVILLE, GA) from 1981 to 1999. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of using regional and local scale models to identify unique areas of concern and understand fine scale hydrologic dynamics under climate change. Descriptions of the models and results of the study are detailed in the final report.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/ee5e8ccb-4d1c-4e7f-96dc-3ce2a85687c9","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/ee5e8ccb-4d1c-4e7f-96dc-3ce2a85687c9/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_57641394e4b07657d19ba808","keyword":["ELOHA","USGS:57641394e4b07657d19ba808","calibration","ecosystem health","environmental flow","hydrologic models","uncertainty","water supply"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T01:31:47.852515","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"regional-to-local-coarse-to-fine-scale-global-change-impact-study-on-flow","spatial_centroid":{"lat":26.985935599999998,"lon":-90.0758116},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-106.645782,17.88419],[-106.645782,40.638554],[-65.220856,40.638554],[-65.220856,17.88419],[-106.645782,17.88419]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Regional to local coarse to fine scale global change impact study on flow","type":"dataset"},{"_score":58.917038,"_sort":[1790472630452,58.917038,0,"3ec0cdfe-f225-4162-a45a-4b677bcabd12"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Climate Adaptation Science Centers","hasEmail":"mailto:casc-data@usgs.gov"},"description":"This file contains results from the project \"Assessing climate-sensitive ecosystems in the southeastern U.S.\", funded by the Department of Interior's Southeast Climate Science Center. Metrics fitting the categories of sensitivity, exposure, and adaptive capacity were calculated for twelve ecosystems in the southeastern U.S. and the Caribbean. Metrics include historic temperature and precipitation, projected future climate variables under two emissions scenarios, projected area affected by sea level rise, proportion of each under protected status, distance from developed areas, variation in elevation, and human modification.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P13XKNSM","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.5440048be4b065f4ad22d2aa.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_5440048be4b065f4ad22d2aa","keyword":["Caribbean","Southeastern US","USGS:5440048be4b065f4ad22d2aa","biota","climate change","ecosystems","external research support","habitat fragmentation","modeling","state and transition modeling","terrestrial ecosystems"],"modified":"2026-09-22T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-91.6300, 19.2697, -67.1484, 36.6400","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Climate sensitivity, exposure, and adaptive capacity results for twelve ecosystems in the southeastern US (2014)"},"description":"This file contains results from the project \"Assessing climate-sensitive ecosystems in the southeastern U.S.\", funded by the Department of Interior's Southeast Climate Science Center. Metrics fitting the categories of sensitivity, exposure, and adaptive capacity were calculated for twelve ecosystems in the southeastern U.S. and the Caribbean. Metrics include historic temperature and precipitation, projected future climate variables under two emissions scenarios, projected area affected by sea level rise, proportion of each under protected status, distance from developed areas, variation in elevation, and human modification.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/c9e9eded-0ba8-4536-ad27-4aafe8b8a587","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/c9e9eded-0ba8-4536-ad27-4aafe8b8a587/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_5440048be4b065f4ad22d2aa","keyword":["Caribbean","Southeastern US","USGS:5440048be4b065f4ad22d2aa","biota","climate change","ecosystems","external research support","habitat fragmentation","modeling","state and transition modeling","terrestrial ecosystems"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T01:30:30.452526","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"climate-sensitivity-exposure-and-adaptive-capacity-results-for-twelve-ecosystems-in-t-2014","spatial_centroid":{"lat":26.21782,"lon":-81.83735999999999},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-91.63,19.2697],[-91.63,36.64],[-67.1484,36.64],[-67.1484,19.2697],[-91.63,19.2697]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Climate sensitivity, exposure, and adaptive capacity results for twelve ecosystems in the southeastern US (2014)","type":"dataset"},{"_score":9.802298,"_sort":[1790472541809,9.802298,0,"e7655769-500a-4b07-b330-f284c30c74b1"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Steven Frank","hasEmail":"mailto:casc-data@usgs.gov"},"description":"In this study, we investigated how the interaction of urbanization, latitudinal warming, and scale insect abundance affected urban tree health. We predicted that trees in warmer, lower latitude cities would be in poorer health at lower levels of urbanization than trees at cooler, higher latitudes due to the interaction of urbanization, latitudinal temperature, and herbivory. To evaluate our predictions, we surveyed the abundance of scale insect herbivores on a single, common tree species (Acer rubrum) in eight US cities spanning 10\u00b0 of latitude. We estimated urbanization at two extents, a local one that accounted for the direct effects on an individual tree, and a larger one that captured the surrounding urban landscape.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P1YDVJN2","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.62b9e2d0d34e8f4977cc9f14.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_62b9e2d0d34e8f4977cc9f14","keyword":["USGS:62b9e2d0d34e8f4977cc9f14","acer rubrum","biota","climate","environment","external research support","latitude","pests","urban heat island"],"modified":"2026-09-23T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Scale insect abundance, impervious surface proportions, and temperature data for Acer rubrum study trees"},"description":"In this study, we investigated how the interaction of urbanization, latitudinal warming, and scale insect abundance affected urban tree health. We predicted that trees in warmer, lower latitude cities would be in poorer health at lower levels of urbanization than trees at cooler, higher latitudes due to the interaction of urbanization, latitudinal temperature, and herbivory. To evaluate our predictions, we surveyed the abundance of scale insect herbivores on a single, common tree species (Acer rubrum) in eight US cities spanning 10\u00b0 of latitude. We estimated urbanization at two extents, a local one that accounted for the direct effects on an individual tree, and a larger one that captured the surrounding urban landscape.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/6248918f-efa7-4af0-bc9e-12ce2bfedad5","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/6248918f-efa7-4af0-bc9e-12ce2bfedad5/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_62b9e2d0d34e8f4977cc9f14","keyword":["USGS:62b9e2d0d34e8f4977cc9f14","acer rubrum","biota","climate","environment","external research support","latitude","pests","urban heat island"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T01:29:01.809754","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"scale-insect-abundance-impervious-surface-proportions-and-temperature-data-for-acer-rubrum","spatial_centroid":null,"spatial_shape":null,"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Scale insect abundance, impervious surface proportions, and temperature data for Acer rubrum study trees","type":"dataset"},{"_score":12.519705,"_sort":[1790472439207,12.519705,0,"dc2f2cab-5061-415b-b776-a7896073a8c6"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Peter Caldwell, PhD","hasEmail":"mailto:pcaldwell02@fs.fed.us"},"description":"Stream flows are essential for maintaining healthy aquatic ecosystems and for supporting human water supply needs. Integrated modeling approaches assessing the impact of changes in climate, land use, and water withdrawals on stream flows and the subsequent impact of changes in flow regime on aquatic biota at multiple spatial scales are necessary to insure an adequate supply of water for humans and healthy river ecosystems. This report inventories and then directly examines and compares a subset of hydrological models implemented in the Southeastern US that were used to estimate streamflow at a number of gaged basins across the region. This effort was designed to evaluate, quantify and compare the magnitude, and investigate the potential causes of error, associated with predicted streamflows from seven hydrologic models of varying complexity and calibration strategy. This was accomplished by computing and then comparing classical hydrologic model fit statistics (e.g., mean bias, coefficient of determination, root mean squared error, NSE), and understanding the bias in the prediction in these and a subset of ecologically relevant flow metrics (ERFM).This spreadsheet contains model fit statistics for the model comparison workshop across 195 USGS streamflow gauges in the southeast. Descriptions of the models included are detailed in the final report.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P144OWF2","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.560c352be4b058f706e54119.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_560c352be4b058f706e54119","keyword":["ELOHA","USGS:560c352be4b058f706e54119","calibration","ecosystem health","environmental flow","hydrologic models","modeling","state and transition modeling","steam-gage measurement","streamflow","uncertainty","water supply","water supply and demand"],"modified":"2026-09-22T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-106.645782, 17.884190, -65.220856, 40.638554","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Large-scale and fine-scale model outputs for model comparison workshop"},"description":"Stream flows are essential for maintaining healthy aquatic ecosystems and for supporting human water supply needs. Integrated modeling approaches assessing the impact of changes in climate, land use, and water withdrawals on stream flows and the subsequent impact of changes in flow regime on aquatic biota at multiple spatial scales are necessary to insure an adequate supply of water for humans and healthy river ecosystems. This report inventories and then directly examines and compares a subset of hydrological models implemented in the Southeastern US that were used to estimate streamflow at a number of gaged basins across the region. This effort was designed to evaluate, quantify and compare the magnitude, and investigate the potential causes of error, associated with predicted streamflows from seven hydrologic models of varying complexity and calibration strategy. This was accomplished by computing and then comparing classical hydrologic model fit statistics (e.g., mean bias, coefficient of determination, root mean squared error, NSE), and understanding the bias in the prediction in these and a subset of ecologically relevant flow metrics (ERFM).This spreadsheet contains model fit statistics for the model comparison workshop across 195 USGS streamflow gauges in the southeast. Descriptions of the models included are detailed in the final report.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/93578628-6176-4591-8440-05e0e6fbacdb","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/93578628-6176-4591-8440-05e0e6fbacdb/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_560c352be4b058f706e54119","keyword":["ELOHA","USGS:560c352be4b058f706e54119","calibration","ecosystem health","environmental flow","hydrologic models","modeling","state and transition modeling","steam-gage measurement","streamflow","uncertainty","water supply","water supply and demand"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T01:27:19.207483","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"large-scale-and-fine-scale-model-outputs-for-model-comparison-workshop","spatial_centroid":{"lat":26.985935599999998,"lon":-90.0758116},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-106.645782,17.88419],[-106.645782,40.638554],[-65.220856,40.638554],[-65.220856,17.88419],[-106.645782,17.88419]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Large-scale and fine-scale model outputs for model comparison workshop","type":"dataset"},{"_score":60.959625,"_sort":[1790472250673,60.959625,0,"018dde7f-1cfc-45ab-969b-5369eccca13e"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Katherine Abbott","hasEmail":"mailto:kmabbott@umass.edu"},"description":"Incorporating climate change into conservation and restoration decisions is increasingly important for natural resource managers and restoration practitioners. Dam removal is an example of a restoration tool that may offer multiple socio-economic and ecological benefits in urban streams and promote climate resilience. With the pace of dam removals increasing, practitioners and researchers are well-poised to incorporate climate change into future dam removal decisions. Therefore, we surveyed dam removal practitioners across 14 states in the eastern United States to understand current practices of dam removals, factors driving restoration decisions, and how climate change knowledge is incorporated into these decisions. We also aimed to identify barriers to and opportunities for knowledge exchange between practitioners and researchers. Of the 100 respondents, most (79%) consider climate change in their dam removal decisions to some extent. Despite this, many reported a lack of clear, relevant, and accessible data linking dam removal to climate resilience benefits. Dam removal practitioners also indicated that they most often rely on climate change information garnered from conversations with colleagues, rather than from scientific research products. These results suggest that the co-production of relevant, salient research questions and readily accessible and interpretable research products (e.g., technical summaries, open access articles) may encourage practitioners to incorporate climate change science more consistently and efficiently into dam removal decisions. These findings may also translate to other stream restoration efforts to inform knowledge exchange and improve restoration outcomes in a changing climate.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.21429/s2pe-ww46","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.64386ed4d34ee8d4addf0da9.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_64386ed4d34ee8d4addf0da9","keyword":["USGS:64386ed4d34ee8d4addf0da9","biota","climate change","dam removal","practitioner survey","social sciences"],"modified":"2026-09-23T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-89.5100, 36.4972, -66.9504, 47.4582","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Dam removal practitioner perspectives on incorporating climate change into dam removal decisions in the eastern United States"},"description":"Incorporating climate change into conservation and restoration decisions is increasingly important for natural resource managers and restoration practitioners. Dam removal is an example of a restoration tool that may offer multiple socio-economic and ecological benefits in urban streams and promote climate resilience. With the pace of dam removals increasing, practitioners and researchers are well-poised to incorporate climate change into future dam removal decisions. Therefore, we surveyed dam removal practitioners across 14 states in the eastern United States to understand current practices of dam removals, factors driving restoration decisions, and how climate change knowledge is incorporated into these decisions. We also aimed to identify barriers to and opportunities for knowledge exchange between practitioners and researchers. Of the 100 respondents, most (79%) consider climate change in their dam removal decisions to some extent. Despite this, many reported a lack of clear, relevant, and accessible data linking dam removal to climate resilience benefits. Dam removal practitioners also indicated that they most often rely on climate change information garnered from conversations with colleagues, rather than from scientific research products. These results suggest that the co-production of relevant, salient research questions and readily accessible and interpretable research products (e.g., technical summaries, open access articles) may encourage practitioners to incorporate climate change science more consistently and efficiently into dam removal decisions. These findings may also translate to other stream restoration efforts to inform knowledge exchange and improve restoration outcomes in a changing climate.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/aaef907e-2801-45c0-b46c-0bb513d7b152","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/aaef907e-2801-45c0-b46c-0bb513d7b152/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_64386ed4d34ee8d4addf0da9","keyword":["USGS:64386ed4d34ee8d4addf0da9","biota","climate change","dam removal","practitioner survey","social sciences"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T01:24:10.673243","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"dam-removal-practitioner-perspectives-on-incorporating-climate-change-into-dam-removal-dec","spatial_centroid":{"lat":40.8816,"lon":-80.48616000000001},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-89.51,36.4972],[-89.51,47.4582],[-66.9504,47.4582],[-66.9504,36.4972],[-89.51,36.4972]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Dam removal practitioner perspectives on incorporating climate change into dam removal decisions in the eastern United States","type":"dataset"},{"_score":51.123245,"_sort":[1790472243298,51.123245,2,"cdcbbcfa-d134-491d-8f23-328f407f54ad"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"James W. Cain","hasEmail":"mailto:jwcain@usgs.gov"},"description":"Natural selection may result in local adaptation to different environmental conditions across the range of a species. Understanding local adaptation, in turn, informs management decisions such as translocation to restore locally-extinct populations. We used a landscape genomics approach to detect genetic signatures of selection related to climatic variation among desert bighorn sheep populations across their indigenous range in the western United States. This approach allowed us to investigate broad patterns of both neutral and adaptive genetic variation across very different environments. Analyses suggested that ancestry and isolation by distance were the most significant forces driving genetic variation in desert bighorn sheep, but that climate was associated with at least 1 locus (i.e., location on the genome) under directional selection. The alternate allele (i.e., variant) at this locus was associated with biologically significant increases in elevation and precipitation, decreases in temperature, and was nearly private to herds occupying the Great Basin ecosystem. Our results suggest climate conditions at higher latitudes may have resulted in a distinct ecotype of desert bighorn sheep whose adaptations are still apparent among the few remaining indigenous populations in the Great Basin. We also found 2 highly supported candidate genes in the genomic region linked to this outlier. How the molecular function of these candidate genes may affect physiological response of desert bighorn sheep to climate is unclear, although their identification provides new insight into the genetic mechanisms potentially underlying environmental adaptation. We identified several other loci under strong directional selection not related to climate and described a previously unknown pattern of strong genetic divergence of bighorn sheep within the White Mountains compared to other populations. Overall, these findings suggest selection from environmental factors may influence genomic variation at the ecosystem-scale in desert bighorn sheep and these results extend our understanding of how this subspecies may respond to different environmental conditions.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P973OBB0","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.5c1a995be4b0708288c59a87.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_5c1a995be4b0708288c59a87","keyword":["Arizona","California","Genetic capacity","Nevada","USGS:5c1a995be4b0708288c59a87","biota","desert bighorn sheep"],"modified":"2026-09-21T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-118.3300, 32.5100, -112.7000, 37.9600","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Evaluating Adaptive Capacity of Desert Bighorn Sheep to Climate Change: Identifying Genetic to Climate Adaptations in Native and Reintroduced Populations-Major Allele Frequency by Population"},"description":"Natural selection may result in local adaptation to different environmental conditions across the range of a species. Understanding local adaptation, in turn, informs management decisions such as translocation to restore locally-extinct populations. We used a landscape genomics approach to detect genetic signatures of selection related to climatic variation among desert bighorn sheep populations across their indigenous range in the western United States. This approach allowed us to investigate broad patterns of both neutral and adaptive genetic variation across very different environments. Analyses suggested that ancestry and isolation by distance were the most significant forces driving genetic variation in desert bighorn sheep, but that climate was associated with at least 1 locus (i.e., location on the genome) under directional selection. The alternate allele (i.e., variant) at this locus was associated with biologically significant increases in elevation and precipitation, decreases in temperature, and was nearly private to herds occupying the Great Basin ecosystem. Our results suggest climate conditions at higher latitudes may have resulted in a distinct ecotype of desert bighorn sheep whose adaptations are still apparent among the few remaining indigenous populations in the Great Basin. We also found 2 highly supported candidate genes in the genomic region linked to this outlier. How the molecular function of these candidate genes may affect physiological response of desert bighorn sheep to climate is unclear, although their identification provides new insight into the genetic mechanisms potentially underlying environmental adaptation. We identified several other loci under strong directional selection not related to climate and described a previously unknown pattern of strong genetic divergence of bighorn sheep within the White Mountains compared to other populations. Overall, these findings suggest selection from environmental factors may influence genomic variation at the ecosystem-scale in desert bighorn sheep and these results extend our understanding of how this subspecies may respond to different environmental conditions.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/4fd6cad0-e91d-4129-a8ff-b204c3b84692","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/4fd6cad0-e91d-4129-a8ff-b204c3b84692/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_5c1a995be4b0708288c59a87","keyword":["Arizona","California","Genetic capacity","Nevada","USGS:5c1a995be4b0708288c59a87","biota","desert bighorn sheep"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T01:24:03.298995","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":2,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"evaluating-adaptive-capacity-of-desert-bighorn-sheep-to-climate-change-identifying-genetic-bc686","spatial_centroid":{"lat":34.69,"lon":-116.078},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-118.33,32.51],[-118.33,37.96],[-112.7,37.96],[-112.7,32.51],[-118.33,32.51]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Evaluating Adaptive Capacity of Desert Bighorn Sheep to Climate Change: Identifying Genetic to Climate Adaptations in Native and Reintroduced Populations-Major Allele Frequency by Population","type":"dataset"},{"_score":59.003483,"_sort":[1790472045922,59.003483,0,"6329f712-6a1c-4bb4-bd30-d734ece1fc3e"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Climate Adaptation Science Centers","hasEmail":"mailto:casc-data@usgs.gov"},"description":"This file contains results from the project \"Assessing climate-sensitive ecosystems in the southeastern U.S.\", funded by the Department of Interior's Southeast Climate Science Center. Metrics required to use the Habitat Climate Change Vulnerability Index (HCCVI) framework, as developed by NatureServe are reported in this spreadsheet. The ecosystems are: East Gulf Coastal Plain Near-Coast Pine Flatwoods, and the Nashville Basin Limestone Glade and Woodland.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P1GDYVYE","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.5440040ce4b065f4ad22d2a8.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_5440040ce4b065f4ad22d2a8","keyword":["Alabama","Florida","Georgia","Tennessee","USGS:5440040ce4b065f4ad22d2a8","biota","climate change","ecosystems","external research support","habitat fragmentation","modeling","state and transition modeling","terrestrial ecosystems"],"modified":"2026-09-22T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-90.3186, 24.9263, -78.4863, 36.6243","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Habitat Climate Change Vulnerability Index (HCCVI) analysis results for two ecosystems in the southeastern US (2014)"},"description":"This file contains results from the project \"Assessing climate-sensitive ecosystems in the southeastern U.S.\", funded by the Department of Interior's Southeast Climate Science Center. Metrics required to use the Habitat Climate Change Vulnerability Index (HCCVI) framework, as developed by NatureServe are reported in this spreadsheet. The ecosystems are: East Gulf Coastal Plain Near-Coast Pine Flatwoods, and the Nashville Basin Limestone Glade and Woodland.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/df973745-5454-4849-a8e4-12cf71073ecd","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/df973745-5454-4849-a8e4-12cf71073ecd/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_5440040ce4b065f4ad22d2a8","keyword":["Alabama","Florida","Georgia","Tennessee","USGS:5440040ce4b065f4ad22d2a8","biota","climate change","ecosystems","external research support","habitat fragmentation","modeling","state and transition modeling","terrestrial ecosystems"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T01:20:45.922882","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"habitat-climate-change-vulnerability-index-hccvi-analysis-results-for-two-ecosystems--2014","spatial_centroid":{"lat":29.6055,"lon":-85.58568},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-90.3186,24.9263],[-90.3186,36.6243],[-78.4863,36.6243],[-78.4863,24.9263],[-90.3186,24.9263]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Habitat Climate Change Vulnerability Index (HCCVI) analysis results for two ecosystems in the southeastern US (2014)","type":"dataset"},{"_score":10.431781,"_sort":[1790472042900,10.431781,2,"0b964c64-6d1d-4654-95d8-444e1f119251"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Michael J Osland","hasEmail":"mailto:mosland@usgs.gov"},"description":"Coastal wetland ecosystems are expected to migrate landward in response to accelerated sea-level rise. However, due to differences in topography and coastal urbanization extent, estuaries vary in their ability to accommodate wetland migration. The landward movement of wetlands requires suitable conditions, such as a gradual slope and land free of urban development. Urban barriers can constrain migration and result in wetland loss (coastal squeeze). For future-focused conservation planning purposes, there is a pressing need to quantify and compare the potential for wetland landward movement and coastal squeeze. For 41 estuaries in the northern Gulf of Mexico (i.e., the USA gulf coast), we quantified and compared the area available for the landward migration of tidal saline wetlands and the area where urban development is expected to prevent migration (coastal squeeze), under three alternative future sea-level rise scenarios (0.5-, 1.0-, and 1.5-m by 2100).","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/F7S75F7K","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.5989fd82e4b09fa1cb0cc903.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_5989fd82e4b09fa1cb0cc903","keyword":["Alabama","Florida","Gulf of Mexico","Louisiana","Mississippi","North America","Texas","USGS:5989fd82e4b09fa1cb0cc903","United States","biota","climate change","effects of climate change","environment","estuaries","estuary","geospatial datasets","natural resource management","planning Cadastre","sea level change","sea-level change","wetlands"],"modified":"2026-09-23T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-97.9958, 24.1683, -80.3992, 32.0006","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Landward migration of tidal saline wetlands with sea-level rise and urbanization: a comparison of northern Gulf of Mexico estuaries"},"description":"Coastal wetland ecosystems are expected to migrate landward in response to accelerated sea-level rise. However, due to differences in topography and coastal urbanization extent, estuaries vary in their ability to accommodate wetland migration. The landward movement of wetlands requires suitable conditions, such as a gradual slope and land free of urban development. Urban barriers can constrain migration and result in wetland loss (coastal squeeze). For future-focused conservation planning purposes, there is a pressing need to quantify and compare the potential for wetland landward movement and coastal squeeze. For 41 estuaries in the northern Gulf of Mexico (i.e., the USA gulf coast), we quantified and compared the area available for the landward migration of tidal saline wetlands and the area where urban development is expected to prevent migration (coastal squeeze), under three alternative future sea-level rise scenarios (0.5-, 1.0-, and 1.5-m by 2100).","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/f6e7a650-da7b-43ee-96a5-885d91133433","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/f6e7a650-da7b-43ee-96a5-885d91133433/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_5989fd82e4b09fa1cb0cc903","keyword":["Alabama","Florida","Gulf of Mexico","Louisiana","Mississippi","North America","Texas","USGS:5989fd82e4b09fa1cb0cc903","United States","biota","climate change","effects of climate change","environment","estuaries","estuary","geospatial datasets","natural resource management","planning Cadastre","sea level change","sea-level change","wetlands"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T01:20:42.900703","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":2,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"landward-migration-of-tidal-saline-wetlands-with-sea-level-rise-and-urbanization-a-compari","spatial_centroid":{"lat":27.30122,"lon":-90.95716},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-97.9958,24.1683],[-97.9958,32.0006],[-80.3992,32.0006],[-80.3992,24.1683],[-97.9958,24.1683]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Landward migration of tidal saline wetlands with sea-level rise and urbanization: a comparison of northern Gulf of Mexico estuaries","type":"dataset"},{"_score":56.69006,"_sort":[1790471998363,56.69006,0,"1a436420-1fb6-4b26-a110-fc352d2284e6"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Imtiaz Rangwala","hasEmail":"mailto:casc-data@usgs.gov"},"description":"These datasets contain time series of anomalies, relative to 1971-2000 period, in the mean, daily minimum and maximum temperatures (F), precipitation (%), growing season length (GSL in days), and warm season duration index (WSDI in days) for the Southwest Colorado region for the three future climate scenarios considered in the Social Ecological and Climate Resiliency (SECR) project","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P13VNPMG","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.fb0a9474-34f0-42f5-b68f-6905702d02bd.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_fb0a9474-34f0-42f5-b68f-6905702d02bd","keyword":["USGS:fb0a9474-34f0-42f5-b68f-6905702d02bd","climate change","climatologyMeteorologyAtmosphere","external research support","precipitation","temperature"],"modified":"2026-09-21T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-108.5000, 36.5000, -106.5000, 38.5000","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Timeseries of the anomalies in temperature and precipitation metrics between 1950-2099 for southwestern Colorado under three future climate scenarios"},"description":"These datasets contain time series of anomalies, relative to 1971-2000 period, in the mean, daily minimum and maximum temperatures (F), precipitation (%), growing season length (GSL in days), and warm season duration index (WSDI in days) for the Southwest Colorado region for the three future climate scenarios considered in the Social Ecological and Climate Resiliency (SECR) project","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/02962b0d-8a2b-447d-8049-130e293ff91c","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/02962b0d-8a2b-447d-8049-130e293ff91c/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_fb0a9474-34f0-42f5-b68f-6905702d02bd","keyword":["USGS:fb0a9474-34f0-42f5-b68f-6905702d02bd","climate change","climatologyMeteorologyAtmosphere","external research support","precipitation","temperature"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T01:19:58.363351","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"timeseries-of-the-anomalies-in-temperature-and-precipitation-metrics-between-1950-2099-for","spatial_centroid":{"lat":37.3,"lon":-107.7},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-108.5,36.5],[-108.5,38.5],[-106.5,38.5],[-106.5,36.5],[-108.5,36.5]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Timeseries of the anomalies in temperature and precipitation metrics between 1950-2099 for southwestern Colorado under three future climate scenarios","type":"dataset"},{"_score":20.584597,"_sort":[1790471975619,20.584597,2,"9a4ed491-61be-456c-a516-e5a9366a0228"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Adam J Terando","hasEmail":"mailto:aterando@usgs.gov"},"description":"Prescribed burning is a critical tool for managing wildfire risks and meeting ecological objectives, but its safe and effective application requires that specific meteorological criteria are met. This dataset contains results from a study examining the potential impacts of projected climatic change on prescribed burning in the southeastern United States. A set of burn window criteria (suitable weather conditions within which burning may occur based on maximum daily temperature, daily average relative humidity, and daily average wind speed), were applied to projections from an ensemble of Global Climate Models (GCM) under two greenhouse gas emission scenarios, as well as past observations for comparison. Data are provided as decadal output for observed conditions, and for individual GCM results for the historical climate scenario and the two future climate scenarios are provided. In addition, summary statistics (e.g., multi-model mean, and for selected quantiles) are provided for the GCM ensemble as a whole by decade.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P95BV7GE","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.609c4426d34ea221ce39d33a.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_609c4426d34ea221ce39d33a","keyword":["Alabama","Arkansas","Florida","Georgia","Kentucky","Louisiana","Mississippi","Missouri","North Carolina","Oklahoma","South Carolina","Southeast United states","Tennessee","Texas","USGS:609c4426d34ea221ce39d33a","Virginia","West Virginia","farming","fires","geoscientificInformation","managed fire regimes","statistical downscaling","wildfires"],"modified":"2026-09-16T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-102.1475, 25.0631, -73.6063, 43.1045","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"GFDLG Monthly Future Prescribed Burn Windows for the Southeast United States 2010-2099 RCP 8.5"},"description":"Prescribed burning is a critical tool for managing wildfire risks and meeting ecological objectives, but its safe and effective application requires that specific meteorological criteria are met. This dataset contains results from a study examining the potential impacts of projected climatic change on prescribed burning in the southeastern United States. A set of burn window criteria (suitable weather conditions within which burning may occur based on maximum daily temperature, daily average relative humidity, and daily average wind speed), were applied to projections from an ensemble of Global Climate Models (GCM) under two greenhouse gas emission scenarios, as well as past observations for comparison. Data are provided as decadal output for observed conditions, and for individual GCM results for the historical climate scenario and the two future climate scenarios are provided. In addition, summary statistics (e.g., multi-model mean, and for selected quantiles) are provided for the GCM ensemble as a whole by decade.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/dc5b0a87-99b9-472e-b4b3-483be183b673","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/dc5b0a87-99b9-472e-b4b3-483be183b673/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_609c4426d34ea221ce39d33a","keyword":["Alabama","Arkansas","Florida","Georgia","Kentucky","Louisiana","Mississippi","Missouri","North Carolina","Oklahoma","South Carolina","Southeast United states","Tennessee","Texas","USGS:609c4426d34ea221ce39d33a","Virginia","West Virginia","farming","fires","geoscientificInformation","managed fire regimes","statistical downscaling","wildfires"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T01:19:35.619305","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":2,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"gfdlg-monthly-future-prescribed-burn-windows-for-the-southeast-united-states-2010-2099-rcp-2c681","spatial_centroid":{"lat":32.27966,"lon":-90.73102},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-102.1475,25.0631],[-102.1475,43.1045],[-73.6063,43.1045],[-73.6063,25.0631],[-102.1475,25.0631]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"GFDLG Monthly Future Prescribed Burn Windows for the Southeast United States 2010-2099 RCP 8.5","type":"dataset"},{"_score":8.83807,"_sort":[1790471768596,8.83807,0,"04358b66-62b8-4acf-b0c5-890d6d32c2f8"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Ellen Aikens","hasEmail":"mailto:eaikens@uwyo.edu"},"description":"The Green Wave Hypothesis posits that herbivore migration manifests in response to waves of spring green-up (i.e., green-wave surfing). Nonetheless, empirical support for the Green Wave Hypothesis is mixed, and a framework for understanding variation in surfing is lacking. In a population of migratory mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), 31% surfed plant phenology in spring as well as a theoretically perfect surfer, and 98% surfed better than random. Green-wave surfing varied among individuals, and was unrelated to age or energetic state. Instead, the greenscape, which we define as the order, rate, and duration of green-up along migratory routes, was the primary factor influencing surfing. Our results indicate that migratory routes are more than a link between seasonal ranges, and they provide an important, but often overlooked, foraging habitat. Additionally, the spatiotemporal configuration of forage resources that propagate along migratory routes shape animal movement and presumably, energy gains during migration.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/F7125RJS","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.efa6c597-35d8-4937-b499-0b974c95cf0c.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_efa6c597-35d8-4937-b499-0b974c95cf0c","keyword":["Forage maturation hypothesis","Migration","Mule deer","Normalized Difference Vegetation Index","Phenology","Resource landscape","USGS:efa6c597-35d8-4937-b499-0b974c95cf0c","Ungulate","biota","climate change","migration","phenology"],"modified":"2026-09-24T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-111.4301, 41.3956, -109.9418, 43.4486","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"The greenscape shapes surfing of resource waves in a large migratory herbivore"},"description":"The Green Wave Hypothesis posits that herbivore migration manifests in response to waves of spring green-up (i.e., green-wave surfing). Nonetheless, empirical support for the Green Wave Hypothesis is mixed, and a framework for understanding variation in surfing is lacking. In a population of migratory mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), 31% surfed plant phenology in spring as well as a theoretically perfect surfer, and 98% surfed better than random. Green-wave surfing varied among individuals, and was unrelated to age or energetic state. Instead, the greenscape, which we define as the order, rate, and duration of green-up along migratory routes, was the primary factor influencing surfing. Our results indicate that migratory routes are more than a link between seasonal ranges, and they provide an important, but often overlooked, foraging habitat. Additionally, the spatiotemporal configuration of forage resources that propagate along migratory routes shape animal movement and presumably, energy gains during migration.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/7b858007-21ba-44fb-9429-0766d167defe","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/7b858007-21ba-44fb-9429-0766d167defe/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_efa6c597-35d8-4937-b499-0b974c95cf0c","keyword":["Forage maturation hypothesis","Migration","Mule deer","Normalized Difference Vegetation Index","Phenology","Resource landscape","USGS:efa6c597-35d8-4937-b499-0b974c95cf0c","Ungulate","biota","climate change","migration","phenology"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T01:16:08.596885","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"the-greenscape-shapes-surfing-of-resource-waves-in-a-large-migratory-herbivore-32aed","spatial_centroid":{"lat":42.2168,"lon":-110.83478},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-111.4301,41.3956],[-111.4301,43.4486],[-109.9418,43.4486],[-109.9418,41.3956],[-111.4301,41.3956]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"The greenscape shapes surfing of resource waves in a large migratory herbivore","type":"dataset"},{"_score":10.70953,"_sort":[1790471742852,10.70953,0,"29aaf2a1-ba49-43c8-bcb8-78f5f339c2ea"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Climate Adaptation Science Centers","hasEmail":"mailto:casc-data@usgs.gov"},"description":"These data represent current and projected mid- and late-century adult walleye presence/absence in inland lakes of Wisconsin, USA. These data were generated using a suite of landscape and thermal predictor variables and data from walleye electrofishing surveys. Data are represented as probabilities (range 0-1) of presence/absence during each time period (current, mid-century and late-century). Data were generated using a random forest approach. The final model contained nine variables: lake area, maximum depth, mean coefficient of variation of surface temperature from 30-60 days post ice off, growing degree days (base 5 \u00b0C), conductivity, proportion developed shoreline, mean coefficient of variation of surface temperature from 0-30 days post ice off, lake order, and the upstream probability of adult walleye in the connected river system. Lake area was the most influential predictor variable (measured by variable importance).","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P9ZLM6UK","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.644a9450d34ee8d4adee04cf.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_644a9450d34ee8d4adee04cf","keyword":["USGS:644a9450d34ee8d4adee04cf","biota","climate change","farming","fisheries","fishing"],"modified":"2026-09-24T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-92.8800, 42.4800, -86.8000, 47.0700","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Current and projected mid- and late-century walleye presence/absence in inland lakes of Wisconsin, USA"},"description":"These data represent current and projected mid- and late-century adult walleye presence/absence in inland lakes of Wisconsin, USA. These data were generated using a suite of landscape and thermal predictor variables and data from walleye electrofishing surveys. Data are represented as probabilities (range 0-1) of presence/absence during each time period (current, mid-century and late-century). Data were generated using a random forest approach. The final model contained nine variables: lake area, maximum depth, mean coefficient of variation of surface temperature from 30-60 days post ice off, growing degree days (base 5 \u00b0C), conductivity, proportion developed shoreline, mean coefficient of variation of surface temperature from 0-30 days post ice off, lake order, and the upstream probability of adult walleye in the connected river system. Lake area was the most influential predictor variable (measured by variable importance).","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/e9e31bd4-3f29-4b8e-8d60-fc4d8c8540d6","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/e9e31bd4-3f29-4b8e-8d60-fc4d8c8540d6/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_644a9450d34ee8d4adee04cf","keyword":["USGS:644a9450d34ee8d4adee04cf","biota","climate change","farming","fisheries","fishing"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T01:15:42.852166","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"current-and-projected-mid-and-late-century-walleye-presence-absence-in-inland-lakes-of-wis","spatial_centroid":{"lat":44.315999999999995,"lon":-90.44800000000001},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-92.88,42.48],[-92.88,47.07],[-86.8,47.07],[-86.8,42.48],[-92.88,42.48]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Current and projected mid- and late-century walleye presence/absence in inland lakes of Wisconsin, USA","type":"dataset"},{"_score":29.744232,"_sort":[1790471663003,29.744232,0,"ef28fb97-535b-4124-bb71-26bf3fe0903e"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Kirsten Lackstrom","hasEmail":"mailto:casc-data@usgs.gov"},"description":"The project team examined State Wildlife Action Plans (SWAPs) from 15 southeastern states and Puerto Rico in order to: 1) identify the various approaches used to address climate change in the recent SWAP updates, 2) highlight key commonalities and differences among the states, and 3) improve understanding of the challenges and opportunities that state agencies face as they address climate change risks. Methods included detailed review of the SWAPs and follow-up interviews with SWAP coordinators. This dataset reviews examples of vulnerability assessment tools and resources used or referenced in the State Wildlife Action Plans.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.21429/xxmc-0050","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.5fdb8896d34e30b9123d238f.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_5fdb8896d34e30b9123d238f","keyword":["Climate Adaptation Planning","Interviews","State Wildlife Action Plans","USGS:5fdb8896d34e30b9123d238f","biota","external research support","social sciences"],"modified":"2026-09-23T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-106.6193, 14.9284, -63.8889, 40.6083","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Examples of vulnerability assessment tools and resources used or referenced in the State Wildlife Action Plans (SWAPs)"},"description":"The project team examined State Wildlife Action Plans (SWAPs) from 15 southeastern states and Puerto Rico in order to: 1) identify the various approaches used to address climate change in the recent SWAP updates, 2) highlight key commonalities and differences among the states, and 3) improve understanding of the challenges and opportunities that state agencies face as they address climate change risks. Methods included detailed review of the SWAPs and follow-up interviews with SWAP coordinators. This dataset reviews examples of vulnerability assessment tools and resources used or referenced in the State Wildlife Action Plans.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/7d926833-8aa4-4485-b6b8-c24c6b941205","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/7d926833-8aa4-4485-b6b8-c24c6b941205/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_5fdb8896d34e30b9123d238f","keyword":["Climate Adaptation Planning","Interviews","State Wildlife Action Plans","USGS:5fdb8896d34e30b9123d238f","biota","external research support","social sciences"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T01:14:23.003616","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"examples-of-vulnerability-assessment-tools-and-resources-used-or-referenced-in-the-state-w","spatial_centroid":{"lat":25.20036,"lon":-89.52714},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-106.6193,14.9284],[-106.6193,40.6083],[-63.8889,40.6083],[-63.8889,14.9284],[-106.6193,14.9284]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Examples of vulnerability assessment tools and resources used or referenced in the State Wildlife Action Plans (SWAPs)","type":"dataset"},{"_score":14.293312,"_sort":[1790471641904,14.293312,0,"72e8e11c-9a1c-4e41-a6fe-fe499426bdcc"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Climate Adaptation Science Centers","hasEmail":"mailto:casc-data@usgs.gov"},"description":"This dataset is a collection generated by an extensive search for both published and ongoing research that, in general, deals with climate change and agriculture in a water quality context for the Eastern Tallgrass Prairie and Big Rivers Landscape Conservation Cooperative (LCC) and Upper Midwest and Great Lakes LCC. The search was two-fold; one portion of the search dealt with an on-line literature search for published peer-reviewed articles for the time period of 2000 (sometimes slightly earlier depending on the relative degree of the publication\u2019s relevance to the topic) to present. The other portion of the search dealt with contacting USGS Water Science Centers and state institutions requesting information on current research projects dealing with this topic that have not yet been published or are currently in publication, and response to these requests has been varied. The search was geographically confined to the geography of the two LLCs an southern Ontario.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P13U52UY","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.51db1188e4b010c7f6a82548.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_51db1188e4b010c7f6a82548","keyword":["Eastern Tallgrass Prairie &amp; Big Rivers LCC","Great Lakes","Illinois","Indiana","Kansas","Landscape Conservation Cooperative","Michigan","Minnesota","Nebraska","Ohio","Oklahoma","Ontario","USGS:51db1188e4b010c7f6a82548","Upper Midwest &amp; Great Lakes LCC","Wisconsin","agriculture","biota","decision support methods"],"modified":"2026-09-21T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-104.2383, 36.5979, -71.0156, 46.6193","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Catalog of Environmental Effects of Agricultural Practices Across the Eastern Tallgrass Prairie and Big Rivers Landscape Conservation Cooperative (LCC) and Upper Midwest and Great Lakes LCC"},"description":"This dataset is a collection generated by an extensive search for both published and ongoing research that, in general, deals with climate change and agriculture in a water quality context for the Eastern Tallgrass Prairie and Big Rivers Landscape Conservation Cooperative (LCC) and Upper Midwest and Great Lakes LCC. The search was two-fold; one portion of the search dealt with an on-line literature search for published peer-reviewed articles for the time period of 2000 (sometimes slightly earlier depending on the relative degree of the publication\u2019s relevance to the topic) to present. The other portion of the search dealt with contacting USGS Water Science Centers and state institutions requesting information on current research projects dealing with this topic that have not yet been published or are currently in publication, and response to these requests has been varied. The search was geographically confined to the geography of the two LLCs an southern Ontario.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/be33cf86-c6f1-44a2-bfec-f780de71d539","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/be33cf86-c6f1-44a2-bfec-f780de71d539/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_51db1188e4b010c7f6a82548","keyword":["Eastern Tallgrass Prairie &amp; Big Rivers LCC","Great Lakes","Illinois","Indiana","Kansas","Landscape Conservation Cooperative","Michigan","Minnesota","Nebraska","Ohio","Oklahoma","Ontario","USGS:51db1188e4b010c7f6a82548","Upper Midwest &amp; Great Lakes LCC","Wisconsin","agriculture","biota","decision support methods"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T01:14:01.904880","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"catalog-of-environmental-effects-of-agricultural-practices-across-the-eastern-tallgrass-pr","spatial_centroid":{"lat":40.606460000000006,"lon":-90.94922},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-104.2383,36.5979],[-104.2383,46.6193],[-71.0156,46.6193],[-71.0156,36.5979],[-104.2383,36.5979]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Catalog of Environmental Effects of Agricultural Practices Across the Eastern Tallgrass Prairie and Big Rivers Landscape Conservation Cooperative (LCC) and Upper Midwest and Great Lakes LCC","type":"dataset"},{"_score":12.878494,"_sort":[1790471512226,12.878494,0,"3af17cbb-85ec-48f2-abc0-e2c48a50123f"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Michael Osland","hasEmail":"mailto:mosland@usgs.gov"},"description":"Winter climate change has the potential to have a large impact on coastal wetlands in the southeastern U.S. Warmer winter temperatures and reductions in the intensity of freeze events would likely lead to mangrove forest range expansion and salt marsh displacement in parts of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic coast. The objective of this research was to better understand some of the ecological implications of mangrove forest migration and salt marsh displacement. The potential ecological effects of mangrove migration are diverse ranging from important biotic impacts (e.g., coastal fisheries, land bird migration; colonial nesting wading birds) to ecosystem stability (e.g., response to sea level rise and drought; habitat loss; coastal protection) to biogeochemical processes (e.g., carbon storage; water quality). In this research, our focus was on the impact of mangrove forest migration on coastal wetland soil processes and the consequent implications for coastal wetland responses to sea level rise, ecosystem resilience, and carbon storage. Our study specifically addressed the following questions: (1) How do ecological processes and ecosystem properties differ between salt marshes and mangrove forests; (2) As mangrove forests develop, how do their ecosystem properties change and how do these properties compare to salt marshes; (3) How do plant-soil interactions across mangrove forest structural gradients differ among three distinct locations that span the northern Gulf of Mexico; and (4) What are the implications of mangrove forest encroachment and development into salt marsh in terms of soil development, carbon and nitrogen storage, and soil strength? To address these questions, we utilized the salt marshes and natural mangrove forest structural gradients present at three distinct locations in the northern Gulf of Mexico: Cedar Key (Florida), Port Fourchon (Louisiana), and Port Aransas (Texas). Each of these locations represents a distinct combination of climate-driven abiotic conditions. We quantified relationships between plant community composition and structure, soil and porewater physicochemical properties, hydroperiod, and climatic conditions. The suite of measurements that we collected provide initial insights into how different geographic areas of an ecotone, with different environmental conditions, may be impacted by mangrove forest expansion and development, and how these changes may alter the supply of specific ecosystem goods and services. This file includes the individual-level tall tree stratum vegetation data.\nThis work was conducted via a collaborative effort between scientists at the U.S. Geological Survey National Wetland Research Center and the Department of Biology of the University of Louisiana at Lafayette.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P1GDTXUR","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.545bfd63e4b009f8aec9b6ce.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_545bfd63e4b009f8aec9b6ce","keyword":["Cedar Key","Gulf of Mexico","Port Aransas","Port Fourchon","State of Florida","State of Louisiana","State of Texas","USGS:545bfd63e4b009f8aec9b6ce","United States of America","environment","vegetation"],"modified":"2026-09-22T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Dataset 3: New vegetation data collection: individual-level tall tree stratum"},"description":"Winter climate change has the potential to have a large impact on coastal wetlands in the southeastern U.S. Warmer winter temperatures and reductions in the intensity of freeze events would likely lead to mangrove forest range expansion and salt marsh displacement in parts of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic coast. The objective of this research was to better understand some of the ecological implications of mangrove forest migration and salt marsh displacement. The potential ecological effects of mangrove migration are diverse ranging from important biotic impacts (e.g., coastal fisheries, land bird migration; colonial nesting wading birds) to ecosystem stability (e.g., response to sea level rise and drought; habitat loss; coastal protection) to biogeochemical processes (e.g., carbon storage; water quality). In this research, our focus was on the impact of mangrove forest migration on coastal wetland soil processes and the consequent implications for coastal wetland responses to sea level rise, ecosystem resilience, and carbon storage. Our study specifically addressed the following questions: (1) How do ecological processes and ecosystem properties differ between salt marshes and mangrove forests; (2) As mangrove forests develop, how do their ecosystem properties change and how do these properties compare to salt marshes; (3) How do plant-soil interactions across mangrove forest structural gradients differ among three distinct locations that span the northern Gulf of Mexico; and (4) What are the implications of mangrove forest encroachment and development into salt marsh in terms of soil development, carbon and nitrogen storage, and soil strength? To address these questions, we utilized the salt marshes and natural mangrove forest structural gradients present at three distinct locations in the northern Gulf of Mexico: Cedar Key (Florida), Port Fourchon (Louisiana), and Port Aransas (Texas). Each of these locations represents a distinct combination of climate-driven abiotic conditions. We quantified relationships between plant community composition and structure, soil and porewater physicochemical properties, hydroperiod, and climatic conditions. The suite of measurements that we collected provide initial insights into how different geographic areas of an ecotone, with different environmental conditions, may be impacted by mangrove forest expansion and development, and how these changes may alter the supply of specific ecosystem goods and services. This file includes the individual-level tall tree stratum vegetation data.\nThis work was conducted via a collaborative effort between scientists at the U.S. Geological Survey National Wetland Research Center and the Department of Biology of the University of Louisiana at Lafayette.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/3699dd4e-da08-47ae-98b9-dbb6086b945d","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/3699dd4e-da08-47ae-98b9-dbb6086b945d/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_545bfd63e4b009f8aec9b6ce","keyword":["Cedar Key","Gulf of Mexico","Port Aransas","Port Fourchon","State of Florida","State of Louisiana","State of Texas","USGS:545bfd63e4b009f8aec9b6ce","United States of America","environment","vegetation"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T01:11:52.226818","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"dataset-3-new-vegetation-data-collection-individual-level-tall-tree-stratum","spatial_centroid":null,"spatial_shape":null,"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Dataset 3: New vegetation data collection: individual-level tall tree stratum","type":"dataset"},{"_score":48.29785,"_sort":[1790471422426,48.29785,0,"d2996eb0-4784-4034-bd6d-91d576b78bab"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Adrienne Marshall","hasEmail":"mailto:mars7850@vandals.uidaho.edu"},"description":"Hourly hydrometeorological data was collected over the 30-year period from 1984-2014 in Upper Sheep Creek, within the Reynolds Creek Experimental Watershed, Idaho, USA. These data were used to calibrate the one-dimensional Simultaneous Heat and Water (SHAW) model. These data and the SHAW calibration have previously been described in multiple publications, particularly Chauvin et al 2011 and Flerchinger et al 2016. In the dataset presented here, climate scenarios have been constructed, applied to the historic record, simulated in the SHAW model, and hydrologic results have been analyzed.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.21429/C9PD2Z","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.58e6840ce4b09da6799ac85b.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_58e6840ce4b09da6799ac85b","keyword":["Idaho","Owyhee County","Reynolds Creek Experimental Watershed","South Idaho","USGS:58e6840ce4b09da6799ac85b","biota","climate change","external research support","modeling","seasonality","semi-arid ecohydrology","snow redistribution","snow-to-rain transition","vegetation mortality"],"modified":"2026-09-21T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-119.2456, 41.5086, -108.8745, 46.6193","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Hydrologic sensitivity to climate change and aspen mortality in Upper Sheep Creek, Reynolds Creek Experimental Watershed (21st century scenarios)"},"description":"Hourly hydrometeorological data was collected over the 30-year period from 1984-2014 in Upper Sheep Creek, within the Reynolds Creek Experimental Watershed, Idaho, USA. These data were used to calibrate the one-dimensional Simultaneous Heat and Water (SHAW) model. These data and the SHAW calibration have previously been described in multiple publications, particularly Chauvin et al 2011 and Flerchinger et al 2016. In the dataset presented here, climate scenarios have been constructed, applied to the historic record, simulated in the SHAW model, and hydrologic results have been analyzed.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/ffa17f52-bd59-45a5-8d55-75616522e8d1","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/ffa17f52-bd59-45a5-8d55-75616522e8d1/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_58e6840ce4b09da6799ac85b","keyword":["Idaho","Owyhee County","Reynolds Creek Experimental Watershed","South Idaho","USGS:58e6840ce4b09da6799ac85b","biota","climate change","external research support","modeling","seasonality","semi-arid ecohydrology","snow redistribution","snow-to-rain transition","vegetation mortality"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T01:10:22.426841","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"hydrologic-sensitivity-to-climate-change-and-aspen-mortality-in-upper-sheep-creek-reynolds","spatial_centroid":{"lat":43.55288,"lon":-115.09715999999999},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-119.2456,41.5086],[-119.2456,46.6193],[-108.8745,46.6193],[-108.8745,41.5086],[-119.2456,41.5086]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Hydrologic sensitivity to climate change and aspen mortality in Upper Sheep Creek, Reynolds Creek Experimental Watershed (21st century scenarios)","type":"dataset"},{"_score":27.425083,"_sort":[1790471345783,27.425083,0,"c6f56e9d-cdaf-42c8-bcea-255b115917ce"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Jared Oyler","hasEmail":"mailto:jaredwo@gmail.com"},"description":"Dataset includes daily estimated climate data for a study site near Seeley Lake MT, USA. We used a locally calibrated temperature index snowfall-snowmelt model to estimate both past and future daily snow water equivalent (SWE) at our study site.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P19ZFWYG","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.54355bc9e4b0a4f4b46a252e.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_54355bc9e4b0a4f4b46a252e","keyword":["Montana","Seeley Lake","USGS:54355bc9e4b0a4f4b46a252e","atmospheric and climatic processes","climate change","environment","external research support","precipitation (atmospheric)","snow","swe","temperature"],"modified":"2026-09-24T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Daily Temperature, Precipitation, and Snow Data, Montana Study Site 1948-2012"},"description":"Dataset includes daily estimated climate data for a study site near Seeley Lake MT, USA. We used a locally calibrated temperature index snowfall-snowmelt model to estimate both past and future daily snow water equivalent (SWE) at our study site.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/fa6548df-7512-488a-9825-239cad18f668","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/fa6548df-7512-488a-9825-239cad18f668/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_54355bc9e4b0a4f4b46a252e","keyword":["Montana","Seeley Lake","USGS:54355bc9e4b0a4f4b46a252e","atmospheric and climatic processes","climate change","environment","external research support","precipitation (atmospheric)","snow","swe","temperature"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T01:09:05.783792","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"daily-temperature-precipitation-and-snow-data-montana-study-site-1948-2012","spatial_centroid":null,"spatial_shape":null,"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Daily Temperature, Precipitation, and Snow Data, Montana Study Site 1948-2012","type":"dataset"},{"_score":10.318937,"_sort":[1790471263217,10.318937,0,"113572f2-1b62-4bb7-b4fd-25fbfc869207"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Ralph W Tingley","hasEmail":"mailto:rtingley@usgs.gov"},"description":"Adult walleye presence/absence in stream reaches of Wisconsin (1989-2017). These data were generated using a suite of landscape and thermal predictor variables and point data from walleye electrofishing and fyke netting attributed to national hydrography database stream reaches. Data are represented at probabilities (range 0-1) of presence. Data were generated using a Random Forest analysis and watershed size and distance to the nearest large or medium size rivers were the most influential predictor variables (measured by variable importance).","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P9ZLM6UK","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.646ecf99d34e4e58932cf822.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_646ecf99d34e4e58932cf822","keyword":["Midwest","USGS:646ecf99d34e4e58932cf822","Wisconsin","boundaries","climate change","climatologyMeteorologyAtmosphere","environment","fisheries","inlandWaters"],"modified":"2026-09-24T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-92.8894, 42.4721, -86.7700, 46.7700","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Adult walleye presence/absence in stream reaches of Wisconsin, USA"},"description":"Adult walleye presence/absence in stream reaches of Wisconsin (1989-2017). These data were generated using a suite of landscape and thermal predictor variables and point data from walleye electrofishing and fyke netting attributed to national hydrography database stream reaches. Data are represented at probabilities (range 0-1) of presence. Data were generated using a Random Forest analysis and watershed size and distance to the nearest large or medium size rivers were the most influential predictor variables (measured by variable importance).","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/e193d112-ae43-4a86-9f6d-a4c330905bab","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/e193d112-ae43-4a86-9f6d-a4c330905bab/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_646ecf99d34e4e58932cf822","keyword":["Midwest","USGS:646ecf99d34e4e58932cf822","Wisconsin","boundaries","climate change","climatologyMeteorologyAtmosphere","environment","fisheries","inlandWaters"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T01:07:43.217714","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"adult-walleye-presence-absence-in-stream-reaches-of-wisconsin-usa","spatial_centroid":{"lat":44.19126,"lon":-90.44163999999999},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-92.8894,42.4721],[-92.8894,46.77],[-86.77,46.77],[-86.77,42.4721],[-92.8894,42.4721]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Adult walleye presence/absence in stream reaches of Wisconsin, USA","type":"dataset"},{"_score":12.906668,"_sort":[1790471103561,12.906668,0,"9aa36225-a6e9-4ff1-9f23-2534ac0bf913"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Michael Osland","hasEmail":"mailto:mosland@usgs.gov"},"description":"Winter climate change has the potential to have a large impact on coastal wetlands in the southeastern U.S. Warmer winter temperatures and reductions in the intensity of freeze events would likely lead to mangrove forest range expansion and salt marsh displacement in parts of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic coast. The objective of this research was to better understand some of the ecological implications of mangrove forest migration and salt marsh displacement. The potential ecological effects of mangrove migration are diverse ranging from important biotic impacts (e.g., coastal fisheries, land bird migration; colonial nesting wading birds) to ecosystem stability (e.g., response to sea level rise and drought; habitat loss; coastal protection) to biogeochemical processes (e.g., carbon storage; water quality). In this research, our focus was on the impact of mangrove forest migration on coastal wetland soil processes and the consequent implications for coastal wetland responses to sea level rise, ecosystem resilience, and carbon storage. Our study specifically addressed the following questions: (1) How do ecological processes and ecosystem properties differ between salt marshes and mangrove forests; (2) As mangrove forests develop, how do their ecosystem properties change and how do these properties compare to salt marshes; (3) How do plant-soil interactions across mangrove forest structural gradients differ among three distinct locations that span the northern Gulf of Mexico; and (4) What are the implications of mangrove forest encroachment and development into salt marsh in terms of soil development, carbon and nitrogen storage, and soil strength? To address these questions, we utilized the salt marshes and natural mangrove forest structural gradients present at three distinct locations in the northern Gulf of Mexico: Cedar Key (Florida), Port Fourchon (Louisiana), and Port Aransas (Texas). Each of these locations represents a distinct combination of climate-driven abiotic conditions. We quantified relationships between plant community composition and structure, soil and porewater physicochemical properties, hydroperiod, and climatic conditions. The suite of measurements that we collected provide initial insights into how different geographic areas of an ecotone, with different environmental conditions, may be impacted by mangrove forest expansion and development, and how these changes may alter the supply of specific ecosystem goods and services. \nThis file includes the individual-level short tree stratum vegetation data.\nThis work was conducted via a collaborative effort between scientists at the U.S. Geological Survey National Wetland Research Center and the Department of Biology of the University of Louisiana at Lafayette.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P1GDTXUR","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.545bfe0fe4b009f8aec9b6fe.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_545bfe0fe4b009f8aec9b6fe","keyword":["Cedar Key","Gulf of Mexico","Port Aransas","Port Fourchon","State of Florida","State of Louisiana","State of Texas","USGS:545bfe0fe4b009f8aec9b6fe","United States of America","environment","vegetation"],"modified":"2026-09-22T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Dataset 4: New vegetation data collection: individual-level short tree stratum"},"description":"Winter climate change has the potential to have a large impact on coastal wetlands in the southeastern U.S. Warmer winter temperatures and reductions in the intensity of freeze events would likely lead to mangrove forest range expansion and salt marsh displacement in parts of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic coast. The objective of this research was to better understand some of the ecological implications of mangrove forest migration and salt marsh displacement. The potential ecological effects of mangrove migration are diverse ranging from important biotic impacts (e.g., coastal fisheries, land bird migration; colonial nesting wading birds) to ecosystem stability (e.g., response to sea level rise and drought; habitat loss; coastal protection) to biogeochemical processes (e.g., carbon storage; water quality). In this research, our focus was on the impact of mangrove forest migration on coastal wetland soil processes and the consequent implications for coastal wetland responses to sea level rise, ecosystem resilience, and carbon storage. Our study specifically addressed the following questions: (1) How do ecological processes and ecosystem properties differ between salt marshes and mangrove forests; (2) As mangrove forests develop, how do their ecosystem properties change and how do these properties compare to salt marshes; (3) How do plant-soil interactions across mangrove forest structural gradients differ among three distinct locations that span the northern Gulf of Mexico; and (4) What are the implications of mangrove forest encroachment and development into salt marsh in terms of soil development, carbon and nitrogen storage, and soil strength? To address these questions, we utilized the salt marshes and natural mangrove forest structural gradients present at three distinct locations in the northern Gulf of Mexico: Cedar Key (Florida), Port Fourchon (Louisiana), and Port Aransas (Texas). Each of these locations represents a distinct combination of climate-driven abiotic conditions. We quantified relationships between plant community composition and structure, soil and porewater physicochemical properties, hydroperiod, and climatic conditions. The suite of measurements that we collected provide initial insights into how different geographic areas of an ecotone, with different environmental conditions, may be impacted by mangrove forest expansion and development, and how these changes may alter the supply of specific ecosystem goods and services. \nThis file includes the individual-level short tree stratum vegetation data.\nThis work was conducted via a collaborative effort between scientists at the U.S. Geological Survey National Wetland Research Center and the Department of Biology of the University of Louisiana at Lafayette.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/b7d55b64-cfba-4505-80b3-9961a8be1103","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/b7d55b64-cfba-4505-80b3-9961a8be1103/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_545bfe0fe4b009f8aec9b6fe","keyword":["Cedar Key","Gulf of Mexico","Port Aransas","Port Fourchon","State of Florida","State of Louisiana","State of Texas","USGS:545bfe0fe4b009f8aec9b6fe","United States of America","environment","vegetation"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T01:05:03.561650","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"dataset-4-new-vegetation-data-collection-individual-level-short-tree-stratum","spatial_centroid":null,"spatial_shape":null,"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Dataset 4: New vegetation data collection: individual-level short tree stratum","type":"dataset"},{"_score":10.40776,"_sort":[1790470891818,10.40776,0,"efc721ec-c9db-451d-a3f1-d3308818daa8"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Ralph W Tingley","hasEmail":"mailto:rtingley@usgs.gov"},"description":"These data represent current and projected mid- and late-century adult walleye presence/absence in inland lakes of Wisconsin, USA. These data were generated using a suite of landscape and thermal predictor variables and data from walleye electrofishing surveys. Data are represented as probabilities (range 0-1) of presence/absence during each time period (current, mid-century and late-century). Data were generated using a random forest approach. The final model contained nine variables: lake area, maximum depth, mean coefficient of variation of surface temperature from 30-60 days post ice off, growing degree days (base 5 \u00b0C), conductivity, proportion developed shoreline, mean coefficient of variation of surface temperature from 0-30 days post ice off, lake order, and the upstream probability of adult walleye in the connected river system. Lake area was the most influential predictor variable (measured by variable importance).","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P9ZLM6UK","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.646ed5a7d34e4e58932cf829.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_646ed5a7d34e4e58932cf829","keyword":["Midwest","USGS:646ed5a7d34e4e58932cf829","Wisconsin","biota","climate change","environment","farming","fisheries"],"modified":"2026-09-24T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-92.8894, 42.4721, -86.7700, 46.7700","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Current and projected mid- and late-century walleye presence/absence in inland lakes of Wisconsin, USA"},"description":"These data represent current and projected mid- and late-century adult walleye presence/absence in inland lakes of Wisconsin, USA. These data were generated using a suite of landscape and thermal predictor variables and data from walleye electrofishing surveys. Data are represented as probabilities (range 0-1) of presence/absence during each time period (current, mid-century and late-century). Data were generated using a random forest approach. The final model contained nine variables: lake area, maximum depth, mean coefficient of variation of surface temperature from 30-60 days post ice off, growing degree days (base 5 \u00b0C), conductivity, proportion developed shoreline, mean coefficient of variation of surface temperature from 0-30 days post ice off, lake order, and the upstream probability of adult walleye in the connected river system. Lake area was the most influential predictor variable (measured by variable importance).","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/56361739-3ef0-48d4-a448-5e6a0bb5f5a1","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/56361739-3ef0-48d4-a448-5e6a0bb5f5a1/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_646ed5a7d34e4e58932cf829","keyword":["Midwest","USGS:646ed5a7d34e4e58932cf829","Wisconsin","biota","climate change","environment","farming","fisheries"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T01:01:31.818256","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"current-and-projected-mid-and-late-century-walleye-presence-absence-in-inland-lakes-of-wis-0453d","spatial_centroid":{"lat":44.19126,"lon":-90.44163999999999},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-92.8894,42.4721],[-92.8894,46.77],[-86.77,46.77],[-86.77,42.4721],[-92.8894,42.4721]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Current and projected mid- and late-century walleye presence/absence in inland lakes of Wisconsin, USA","type":"dataset"},{"_score":30.542833,"_sort":[1790470866583,30.542833,0,"8ba3b909-4729-4bf2-b377-e196ee659b00"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Cody Hudson","hasEmail":"mailto:chudson@intera.com"},"description":"Daily streamflow and reservoir water elevation data for modeled locations in the Red River Basin. Values reported are for 18 different GCM (Global Climate Model) / RCP (Representative Concentration Pathway) / GDM Downscaling scenarios. Climate data from each scenario was input into a Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) model, that output flow values. These values were then input into RiverWare, to determine the impacts on regulated flows, lake levels and water availability. RiverWare was used for this project, because of its ability to simulate water use, reservoir operations, and local/interstate regulations.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.21429/C91599","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.57d6e56be4b090824ff87b97.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_57d6e56be4b090824ff87b97","keyword":["Arkansas","Climate Change","Red River","RiverWare","USGS:57d6e56be4b090824ff87b97","Water Availability","environment"],"modified":"2026-09-23T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-94.3838, 33.0127, -91.4403, 34.6279","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"RiverWare Daily Simulated values of Streamflow from 2006-2099: Arkansas"},"description":"Daily streamflow and reservoir water elevation data for modeled locations in the Red River Basin. Values reported are for 18 different GCM (Global Climate Model) / RCP (Representative Concentration Pathway) / GDM Downscaling scenarios. Climate data from each scenario was input into a Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) model, that output flow values. These values were then input into RiverWare, to determine the impacts on regulated flows, lake levels and water availability. RiverWare was used for this project, because of its ability to simulate water use, reservoir operations, and local/interstate regulations.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/bf00aadd-224d-4971-bcd4-d20d67b99b59","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/bf00aadd-224d-4971-bcd4-d20d67b99b59/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_57d6e56be4b090824ff87b97","keyword":["Arkansas","Climate Change","Red River","RiverWare","USGS:57d6e56be4b090824ff87b97","Water Availability","environment"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T01:01:06.583262","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"riverware-daily-simulated-values-of-streamflow-from-2006-2099-arkansas","spatial_centroid":{"lat":33.65878,"lon":-93.2064},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-94.3838,33.0127],[-94.3838,34.6279],[-91.4403,34.6279],[-91.4403,33.0127],[-94.3838,33.0127]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"RiverWare Daily Simulated values of Streamflow from 2006-2099: Arkansas","type":"dataset"},{"_score":20.510447,"_sort":[1790470849147,20.510447,1,"839fe149-cf82-4582-a96d-f13882c9654f"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Adam J Terando","hasEmail":"mailto:aterando@usgs.gov"},"description":"Prescribed burning is a critical tool for managing wildfire risks and meeting ecological objectives, but its safe and effective application requires that specific meteorological criteria are met. This dataset contains results from a study examining the potential impacts of projected climatic change on prescribed burning in the southeastern United States. A set of burn window criteria (suitable weather conditions within which burning may occur based on maximum daily temperature, daily average relative humidity, and daily average wind speed), were applied to projections from an ensemble of Global Climate Models (GCM) under two greenhouse gas emission scenarios, as well as past observations for comparison. Data are provided as decadal output for observed conditions, and for individual GCM results for the historical climate scenario and the two future climate scenarios are provided. In addition, summary statistics (e.g., multi-model mean, and for selected quantiles) are provided for the GCM ensemble as a whole by decade.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P95BV7GE","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.609c8666d34ea221ce3abde8.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_609c8666d34ea221ce3abde8","keyword":["Alabama","Arkansas","Florida","Georgia","Kentucky","Louisiana","Mississippi","Missouri","North Carolina","Oklahoma","South Carolina","Southeast United states","Tennessee","Texas","USGS:609c8666d34ea221ce3abde8","Virginia","West Virginia","farming","fires","geoscientificInformation","managed fire regimes","statistical downscaling","wildfires"],"modified":"2026-09-16T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-102.1475, 25.0631, -73.6063, 43.1045","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"GFDLG Historical Prescribed Burn Windows for the Southeast United States 1950-1999"},"description":"Prescribed burning is a critical tool for managing wildfire risks and meeting ecological objectives, but its safe and effective application requires that specific meteorological criteria are met. This dataset contains results from a study examining the potential impacts of projected climatic change on prescribed burning in the southeastern United States. A set of burn window criteria (suitable weather conditions within which burning may occur based on maximum daily temperature, daily average relative humidity, and daily average wind speed), were applied to projections from an ensemble of Global Climate Models (GCM) under two greenhouse gas emission scenarios, as well as past observations for comparison. Data are provided as decadal output for observed conditions, and for individual GCM results for the historical climate scenario and the two future climate scenarios are provided. In addition, summary statistics (e.g., multi-model mean, and for selected quantiles) are provided for the GCM ensemble as a whole by decade.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/2942de2d-bdf4-456d-9b71-6c54008d66ad","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/2942de2d-bdf4-456d-9b71-6c54008d66ad/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_609c8666d34ea221ce3abde8","keyword":["Alabama","Arkansas","Florida","Georgia","Kentucky","Louisiana","Mississippi","Missouri","North Carolina","Oklahoma","South Carolina","Southeast United states","Tennessee","Texas","USGS:609c8666d34ea221ce3abde8","Virginia","West Virginia","farming","fires","geoscientificInformation","managed fire regimes","statistical downscaling","wildfires"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T01:00:49.147390","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":1,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"gfdlg-historical-prescribed-burn-windows-for-the-southeast-united-states-1950-1999","spatial_centroid":{"lat":32.27966,"lon":-90.73102},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-102.1475,25.0631],[-102.1475,43.1045],[-73.6063,43.1045],[-73.6063,25.0631],[-102.1475,25.0631]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"GFDLG Historical Prescribed Burn Windows for the Southeast United States 1950-1999","type":"dataset"},{"_score":20.680872,"_sort":[1790470840840,20.680872,1,"572a5dec-d9da-4784-b603-2b0c2129caab"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Adam J Terando","hasEmail":"mailto:aterando@usgs.gov"},"description":"Prescribed burning is a critical tool for managing wildfire risks and meeting ecological objectives, but its safe and effective application requires that specific meteorological criteria are met. This dataset contains results from a study examining the potential impacts of projected climatic change on prescribed burning in the southeastern United States. A set of burn window criteria (suitable weather conditions within which burning may occur based on maximum daily temperature, daily average relative humidity, and daily average wind speed), were applied to projections from an ensemble of Global Climate Models (GCM) under two greenhouse gas emission scenarios, as well as past observations for comparison. Data are provided as decadal output for observed conditions, and for individual GCM results for the historical climate scenario and the two future climate scenarios are provided. In addition, summary statistics (e.g., multi-model mean, and for selected quantiles) are provided for the GCM ensemble as a whole by decade.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P95BV7GE","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.609c8561d34ea221ce3ab948.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_609c8561d34ea221ce3ab948","keyword":["Alabama","Arkansas","Florida","Georgia","Kentucky","Louisiana","Mississippi","Missouri","North Carolina","Oklahoma","South Carolina","Southeast United states","Tennessee","Texas","USGS:609c8561d34ea221ce3ab948","Virginia","West Virginia","farming","fires","geoscientificInformation","managed fire regimes","statistical downscaling","wildfires"],"modified":"2026-09-16T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-102.1475, 25.0631, -73.6063, 43.1045","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"BCCM Historical Prescribed Burn Windows for the Southeast United States 1950-1999"},"description":"Prescribed burning is a critical tool for managing wildfire risks and meeting ecological objectives, but its safe and effective application requires that specific meteorological criteria are met. This dataset contains results from a study examining the potential impacts of projected climatic change on prescribed burning in the southeastern United States. A set of burn window criteria (suitable weather conditions within which burning may occur based on maximum daily temperature, daily average relative humidity, and daily average wind speed), were applied to projections from an ensemble of Global Climate Models (GCM) under two greenhouse gas emission scenarios, as well as past observations for comparison. Data are provided as decadal output for observed conditions, and for individual GCM results for the historical climate scenario and the two future climate scenarios are provided. In addition, summary statistics (e.g., multi-model mean, and for selected quantiles) are provided for the GCM ensemble as a whole by decade.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/e2c464db-bb1d-46ee-a71d-d194df4567f8","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/e2c464db-bb1d-46ee-a71d-d194df4567f8/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_609c8561d34ea221ce3ab948","keyword":["Alabama","Arkansas","Florida","Georgia","Kentucky","Louisiana","Mississippi","Missouri","North Carolina","Oklahoma","South Carolina","Southeast United states","Tennessee","Texas","USGS:609c8561d34ea221ce3ab948","Virginia","West Virginia","farming","fires","geoscientificInformation","managed fire regimes","statistical downscaling","wildfires"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T01:00:40.840769","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":1,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"bccm-historical-prescribed-burn-windows-for-the-southeast-united-states-1950-1999","spatial_centroid":{"lat":32.27966,"lon":-90.73102},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-102.1475,25.0631],[-102.1475,43.1045],[-73.6063,43.1045],[-73.6063,25.0631],[-102.1475,25.0631]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"BCCM Historical Prescribed Burn Windows for the Southeast United States 1950-1999","type":"dataset"},{"_score":57.102394,"_sort":[1790470812928,57.102394,0,"2d42a287-c3aa-41b1-9654-fe1182a1db03"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Kirsten Lackstrom","hasEmail":"mailto:casc-data@usgs.gov"},"description":"The project team examined State Wildlife Action Plans (SWAPs) from 15 southeastern states and Puerto Rico in order to: 1) identify the various approaches used to address climate change in the recent SWAP updates, 2) highlight key commonalities and differences among the states, and 3) improve understanding of the challenges and opportunities that state agencies face as they address climate change risks. Methods included detailed review of the SWAPs and follow-up interviews with SWAP coordinators. This dataset reviews examples of climate adaptation planning tools, approaches, and resources referenced in SWAPs and interviews.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.21429/k3y5-3g50","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.5fdb884fd34e30b9123d237b.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_5fdb884fd34e30b9123d237b","keyword":["Climate Adaptation Planning","Interviews","State Wildlife Action Plans","USGS:5fdb884fd34e30b9123d237b","climatologyMeteorologyAtmosphere","external research support","social sciences"],"modified":"2026-09-23T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-106.6193, 14.9284, -63.8889, 40.6083","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Examples of climate adaptation planning tools, approaches, and resources referenced in State Wildlife Action Plans (SWAPs) and Interviews"},"description":"The project team examined State Wildlife Action Plans (SWAPs) from 15 southeastern states and Puerto Rico in order to: 1) identify the various approaches used to address climate change in the recent SWAP updates, 2) highlight key commonalities and differences among the states, and 3) improve understanding of the challenges and opportunities that state agencies face as they address climate change risks. Methods included detailed review of the SWAPs and follow-up interviews with SWAP coordinators. This dataset reviews examples of climate adaptation planning tools, approaches, and resources referenced in SWAPs and interviews.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/b4cffb8e-4ae8-4958-ab18-1e7a24ce0c04","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/b4cffb8e-4ae8-4958-ab18-1e7a24ce0c04/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_5fdb884fd34e30b9123d237b","keyword":["Climate Adaptation Planning","Interviews","State Wildlife Action Plans","USGS:5fdb884fd34e30b9123d237b","climatologyMeteorologyAtmosphere","external research support","social sciences"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T01:00:12.928336","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"examples-of-climate-adaptation-planning-tools-approaches-and-resources-referenced-in-state","spatial_centroid":{"lat":25.20036,"lon":-89.52714},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-106.6193,14.9284],[-106.6193,40.6083],[-63.8889,40.6083],[-63.8889,14.9284],[-106.6193,14.9284]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Examples of climate adaptation planning tools, approaches, and resources referenced in State Wildlife Action Plans (SWAPs) and Interviews","type":"dataset"},{"_score":30.484417,"_sort":[1790470761074,30.484417,0,"faeca83b-d32d-415d-921d-46d8095cba16"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Cody Hudson","hasEmail":"mailto:chudson@intera.com"},"description":"Daily streamflow and reservoir water elevation data for modeled locations in the Red River Basin. Values reported are for 18 different GCM (Global Climate Model) / RCP (Representative Concentration Pathway) / GDM Downscaling scenarios. Climate data from each scenario was input into a Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) model, that output flow values. These values were then input into RiverWare, to determine the impacts on regulated flows, lake levels and water availability. RiverWare was used for this project, because of its ability to simulate water use, reservoir operations, and local/interstate regulations.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.21429/C91599","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.57d84de3e4b090824ff9ac7d.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_57d84de3e4b090824ff9ac7d","keyword":["Climate Change","Red River","RiverWare","Texas","USGS:57d84de3e4b090824ff9ac7d","Water Availability","environment"],"modified":"2026-09-23T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-102.1468, 32.7581, -94.2726, 35.2727","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"RiverWare Daily Simulated values of Streamflow from 2006-2099: Texas"},"description":"Daily streamflow and reservoir water elevation data for modeled locations in the Red River Basin. Values reported are for 18 different GCM (Global Climate Model) / RCP (Representative Concentration Pathway) / GDM Downscaling scenarios. Climate data from each scenario was input into a Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) model, that output flow values. These values were then input into RiverWare, to determine the impacts on regulated flows, lake levels and water availability. RiverWare was used for this project, because of its ability to simulate water use, reservoir operations, and local/interstate regulations.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/265fb6d6-73e7-4f5e-8bf4-9b89f349c93e","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/265fb6d6-73e7-4f5e-8bf4-9b89f349c93e/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_57d84de3e4b090824ff9ac7d","keyword":["Climate Change","Red River","RiverWare","Texas","USGS:57d84de3e4b090824ff9ac7d","Water Availability","environment"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T00:59:21.074497","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"riverware-daily-simulated-values-of-streamflow-from-2006-2099-texas","spatial_centroid":{"lat":33.763940000000005,"lon":-98.99712},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-102.1468,32.7581],[-102.1468,35.2727],[-94.2726,35.2727],[-94.2726,32.7581],[-102.1468,32.7581]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"RiverWare Daily Simulated values of Streamflow from 2006-2099: Texas","type":"dataset"},{"_score":12.882345,"_sort":[1790470734612,12.882345,0,"cfaff99d-099a-4d4c-a7c7-0465b6d22924"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Michael Osland","hasEmail":"mailto:mosland@usgs.gov"},"description":"Winter climate change has the potential to have a large impact on coastal wetlands in the southeastern U.S. Warmer winter temperatures and reductions in the intensity of freeze events would likely lead to mangrove forest range expansion and salt marsh displacement in parts of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic coast. The objective of this research was to better understand some of the ecological implications of mangrove forest migration and salt marsh displacement. The potential ecological effects of mangrove migration are diverse ranging from important biotic impacts (e.g., coastal fisheries, land bird migration; colonial nesting wading birds) to ecosystem stability (e.g., response to sea level rise and drought; habitat loss; coastal protection) to biogeochemical processes (e.g., carbon storage; water quality). In this research, our focus was on the impact of mangrove forest migration on coastal wetland soil processes and the consequent implications for coastal wetland responses to sea level rise, ecosystem resilience, and carbon storage. Our study specifically addressed the following questions: (1) How do ecological processes and ecosystem properties differ between salt marshes and mangrove forests; (2) As mangrove forests develop, how do their ecosystem properties change and how do these properties compare to salt marshes; (3) How do plant-soil interactions across mangrove forest structural gradients differ among three distinct locations that span the northern Gulf of Mexico; and (4) What are the implications of mangrove forest encroachment and development into salt marsh in terms of soil development, carbon and nitrogen storage, and soil strength? To address these questions, we utilized the salt marshes and natural mangrove forest structural gradients present at three distinct locations in the northern Gulf of Mexico: Cedar Key (Florida), Port Fourchon (Louisiana), and Port Aransas (Texas). Each of these locations represents a distinct combination of climate-driven abiotic conditions. We quantified relationships between plant community composition and structure, soil and porewater physicochemical properties, hydroperiod, and climatic conditions. The suite of measurements that we collected provide initial insights into how different geographic areas of an ecotone, with different environmental conditions, may be impacted by mangrove forest expansion and development, and how these changes may alter the supply of specific ecosystem goods and services. This file includes the site-level marsh biomass data.\nThis work was conducted via a collaborative effort between scientists at the U.S. Geological Survey National Wetland Research Center and the Department of Biology of the University of Louisiana at Lafayette.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P1GDTXUR","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.545cfb0be4b0ba8303f7124f.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_545cfb0be4b0ba8303f7124f","keyword":["Avicennia germinans","Cedar Key","Gulf of Mexico","Port Aransas","Port Fourchon","Spartina alterniflora","State of Florida","State of Louisiana","State of Texas","USGS:545cfb0be4b0ba8303f7124f","United States of America","environment","habitat","soil","vegetation"],"modified":"2026-09-22T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Dataset 7: New vegetation data collection: site-level marsh biomass"},"description":"Winter climate change has the potential to have a large impact on coastal wetlands in the southeastern U.S. Warmer winter temperatures and reductions in the intensity of freeze events would likely lead to mangrove forest range expansion and salt marsh displacement in parts of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic coast. The objective of this research was to better understand some of the ecological implications of mangrove forest migration and salt marsh displacement. The potential ecological effects of mangrove migration are diverse ranging from important biotic impacts (e.g., coastal fisheries, land bird migration; colonial nesting wading birds) to ecosystem stability (e.g., response to sea level rise and drought; habitat loss; coastal protection) to biogeochemical processes (e.g., carbon storage; water quality). In this research, our focus was on the impact of mangrove forest migration on coastal wetland soil processes and the consequent implications for coastal wetland responses to sea level rise, ecosystem resilience, and carbon storage. Our study specifically addressed the following questions: (1) How do ecological processes and ecosystem properties differ between salt marshes and mangrove forests; (2) As mangrove forests develop, how do their ecosystem properties change and how do these properties compare to salt marshes; (3) How do plant-soil interactions across mangrove forest structural gradients differ among three distinct locations that span the northern Gulf of Mexico; and (4) What are the implications of mangrove forest encroachment and development into salt marsh in terms of soil development, carbon and nitrogen storage, and soil strength? To address these questions, we utilized the salt marshes and natural mangrove forest structural gradients present at three distinct locations in the northern Gulf of Mexico: Cedar Key (Florida), Port Fourchon (Louisiana), and Port Aransas (Texas). Each of these locations represents a distinct combination of climate-driven abiotic conditions. We quantified relationships between plant community composition and structure, soil and porewater physicochemical properties, hydroperiod, and climatic conditions. The suite of measurements that we collected provide initial insights into how different geographic areas of an ecotone, with different environmental conditions, may be impacted by mangrove forest expansion and development, and how these changes may alter the supply of specific ecosystem goods and services. This file includes the site-level marsh biomass data.\nThis work was conducted via a collaborative effort between scientists at the U.S. Geological Survey National Wetland Research Center and the Department of Biology of the University of Louisiana at Lafayette.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/2bf27498-d7eb-477d-805b-76c5e1860e70","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/2bf27498-d7eb-477d-805b-76c5e1860e70/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_545cfb0be4b0ba8303f7124f","keyword":["Avicennia germinans","Cedar Key","Gulf of Mexico","Port Aransas","Port Fourchon","Spartina alterniflora","State of Florida","State of Louisiana","State of Texas","USGS:545cfb0be4b0ba8303f7124f","United States of America","environment","habitat","soil","vegetation"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T00:58:54.612973","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"dataset-7-new-vegetation-data-collection-site-level-marsh-biomass","spatial_centroid":null,"spatial_shape":null,"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Dataset 7: New vegetation data collection: site-level marsh biomass","type":"dataset"},{"_score":28.894855,"_sort":[1790470669941,28.894855,0,"64f176d3-a8c1-4cc2-940a-61d3491a2288"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Cody Hudson","hasEmail":"mailto:chudson@intera.com"},"description":"Daily streamflow and reservoir water elevation data for modeled locations in the Red River Basin. Values reported are for 18 different GCM (Global Climate Model) / RCP (Representative Concentration Pathway) / GDM Downscaling scenarios. Climate data from each scenario was input into a Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) model, that output flow values. These values were then input into RiverWare, to determine the impacts on regulated flows, lake levels and water availability. RiverWare was used for this project, because of its ability to simulate water use, reservoir operations, and local/interstate regulations.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.21429/C91599","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.57d6e36ee4b090824ff87b93.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_57d6e36ee4b090824ff87b93","keyword":["Arkansas","Climate Change","Louisiana","Oklahoma","Red River","RiverWare","Texas","USGS:57d6e36ee4b090824ff87b93","Water Availability","environment","external research support","modeling","streamflow","water resource management","water resources"],"modified":"2026-09-23T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-106.52344, 36.80928, -89.73633, 25.87899","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Daily streamflow and reservoir water elevation data for Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas (2006-2099)"},"description":"Daily streamflow and reservoir water elevation data for modeled locations in the Red River Basin. Values reported are for 18 different GCM (Global Climate Model) / RCP (Representative Concentration Pathway) / GDM Downscaling scenarios. Climate data from each scenario was input into a Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) model, that output flow values. These values were then input into RiverWare, to determine the impacts on regulated flows, lake levels and water availability. RiverWare was used for this project, because of its ability to simulate water use, reservoir operations, and local/interstate regulations.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/ac7425c0-748a-40d4-b09b-2f60e7f09219","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/ac7425c0-748a-40d4-b09b-2f60e7f09219/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_57d6e36ee4b090824ff87b93","keyword":["Arkansas","Climate Change","Louisiana","Oklahoma","Red River","RiverWare","Texas","USGS:57d6e36ee4b090824ff87b93","Water Availability","environment","external research support","modeling","streamflow","water resource management","water resources"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T00:57:49.941787","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"daily-streamflow-and-reservoir-water-elevation-data-for-arkansas-louisiana-oklah-2006-2099","spatial_centroid":{"lat":32.437164,"lon":-99.808596},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-106.52344,36.80928],[-106.52344,25.87899],[-89.73633,25.87899],[-89.73633,36.80928],[-106.52344,36.80928]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Daily streamflow and reservoir water elevation data for Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas (2006-2099)","type":"dataset"},{"_score":19.630161,"_sort":[1790470654964,19.630161,2,"ed880795-0303-4547-bc63-e8a1d0607d59"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"William J. Andrews","hasEmail":"mailto:wandrews@usgs.gov"},"description":"Geographic patterns and time trends of water-quality, modeled streamflow, and ecological data were compared along the Canadian River and selected tributaries in northeastern New Mexico to Lake Eufaula in Oklahoma to determine effects of climate change on water quality, streamflows, fish populations and ecological flows in this watershed from 1939 to 2013. Project participants included staff from the Oklahoma Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Vieux and Associates, USGS New Jersey Water Science Center and the USGS Oklahoma Water Science Center. Principal project funding was by the South Central Climate Science Center, with in-kind matching from the project participant organizations.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P9A7DRPE","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.5b990e7be4b0702d0e857da6.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_5b990e7be4b0702d0e857da6","keyword":["Ecology","Instream Flows","Precipitation Variability","USGS:5b990e7be4b0702d0e857da6","biota"],"modified":"2026-09-23T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-103.4334, 34.8119, -95.691155, 36.054","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Geographic patterns and time trends in surface-water quality, modeled streamflow, fish population characteristics, and ecological flows in the Canadian River Basin from Northeast New Mexico to Lake Eufaula, Oklahoma"},"description":"Geographic patterns and time trends of water-quality, modeled streamflow, and ecological data were compared along the Canadian River and selected tributaries in northeastern New Mexico to Lake Eufaula in Oklahoma to determine effects of climate change on water quality, streamflows, fish populations and ecological flows in this watershed from 1939 to 2013. Project participants included staff from the Oklahoma Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Vieux and Associates, USGS New Jersey Water Science Center and the USGS Oklahoma Water Science Center. Principal project funding was by the South Central Climate Science Center, with in-kind matching from the project participant organizations.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/d703e746-3283-4fc5-907d-0a474c6dac03","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/d703e746-3283-4fc5-907d-0a474c6dac03/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_5b990e7be4b0702d0e857da6","keyword":["Ecology","Instream Flows","Precipitation Variability","USGS:5b990e7be4b0702d0e857da6","biota"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T00:57:34.964561","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":2,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"geographic-patterns-and-time-trends-in-surface-water-quality-modeled-streamflow-fish-popul","spatial_centroid":{"lat":35.30874,"lon":-100.336502},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-103.4334,34.8119],[-103.4334,36.054],[-95.691155,36.054],[-95.691155,34.8119],[-103.4334,34.8119]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Geographic patterns and time trends in surface-water quality, modeled streamflow, fish population characteristics, and ecological flows in the Canadian River Basin from Northeast New Mexico to Lake Eufaula, Oklahoma","type":"dataset"},{"_score":20.709358,"_sort":[1790470595808,20.709358,1,"fbb737bc-d963-4f99-ae00-f1b0af1343a2"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Adam J Terando","hasEmail":"mailto:aterando@usgs.gov"},"description":"Prescribed burning is a critical tool for managing wildfire risks and meeting ecological objectives, but its safe and effective application requires that specific meteorological criteria are met. This dataset contains results from a study examining the potential impacts of projected climatic change on prescribed burning in the southeastern United States. A set of burn window criteria (suitable weather conditions within which burning may occur based on maximum daily temperature, daily average relative humidity, and daily average wind speed), were applied to projections from an ensemble of Global Climate Models (GCM) under two greenhouse gas emission scenarios, as well as past observations for comparison. Data are provided as decadal output for observed conditions, and for individual GCM results for the historical climate scenario and the two future climate scenarios are provided. In addition, summary statistics (e.g., multi-model mean, and for selected quantiles) are provided for the GCM ensemble as a whole by decade.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P95BV7GE","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.609c87add34ea221ce3ac3a8.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_609c87add34ea221ce3ac3a8","keyword":["Alabama","Arkansas","Florida","Georgia","Kentucky","Louisiana","Mississippi","Missouri","North Carolina","Oklahoma","South Carolina","Southeast United states","Tennessee","Texas","USGS:609c87add34ea221ce3ac3a8","Virginia","West Virginia","farming","fires","geoscientificInformation","managed fire regimes","statistical downscaling","wildfires"],"modified":"2026-09-16T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-102.1475, 25.0631, -73.6063, 43.1045","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"IPSLBL Historical Prescribed Burn Windows for the Southeast United States 1950-1999"},"description":"Prescribed burning is a critical tool for managing wildfire risks and meeting ecological objectives, but its safe and effective application requires that specific meteorological criteria are met. This dataset contains results from a study examining the potential impacts of projected climatic change on prescribed burning in the southeastern United States. A set of burn window criteria (suitable weather conditions within which burning may occur based on maximum daily temperature, daily average relative humidity, and daily average wind speed), were applied to projections from an ensemble of Global Climate Models (GCM) under two greenhouse gas emission scenarios, as well as past observations for comparison. Data are provided as decadal output for observed conditions, and for individual GCM results for the historical climate scenario and the two future climate scenarios are provided. In addition, summary statistics (e.g., multi-model mean, and for selected quantiles) are provided for the GCM ensemble as a whole by decade.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/77891be8-b0a4-4f3e-a63a-8245e7d04ff1","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/77891be8-b0a4-4f3e-a63a-8245e7d04ff1/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_609c87add34ea221ce3ac3a8","keyword":["Alabama","Arkansas","Florida","Georgia","Kentucky","Louisiana","Mississippi","Missouri","North Carolina","Oklahoma","South Carolina","Southeast United states","Tennessee","Texas","USGS:609c87add34ea221ce3ac3a8","Virginia","West Virginia","farming","fires","geoscientificInformation","managed fire regimes","statistical downscaling","wildfires"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T00:56:35.808602","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":1,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"ipslbl-historical-prescribed-burn-windows-for-the-southeast-united-states-1950-1999","spatial_centroid":{"lat":32.27966,"lon":-90.73102},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-102.1475,25.0631],[-102.1475,43.1045],[-73.6063,43.1045],[-73.6063,25.0631],[-102.1475,25.0631]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"IPSLBL Historical Prescribed Burn Windows for the Southeast United States 1950-1999","type":"dataset"},{"_score":22.228659,"_sort":[1790470502982,22.228659,0,"618c6785-c1dd-49cc-8257-fa3ba6954bf2"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Climate Adaptation Science Centers","hasEmail":"mailto:casc-data@usgs.gov"},"description":"Winter climate change has the potential to have a large impact on coastal wetlands in the southeastern U.S. Warmer winter temperatures and reductions in the intensity of freeze events would likely lead to mangrove forest range expansion and salt marsh displacement in parts of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic coast. The objective of this research was to better understand some of the ecological implications of mangrove forest migration and salt marsh displacement. The potential ecological effects of mangrove migration are diverse ranging from important biotic impacts (e.g., coastal fisheries, land bird migration; colonial nesting wading birds) to ecosystem stability (e.g., response to sea level rise and drought; habitat loss; coastal protection) to biogeochemical processes (e.g., carbon storage; water quality). In this research, our focus was on the impact of mangrove forest migration on coastal wetland soil processes and the consequent implications for coastal wetland responses to sea level rise, ecosystem resilience, and carbon storage. Our study specifically addressed the following questions: (1) How do ecological processes and ecosystem properties differ between salt marshes and mangrove forests; (2) As mangrove forests develop, how do their ecosystem properties change and how do these properties compare to salt marshes; (3) How do plant-soil interactions across mangrove forest structural gradients differ among three distinct locations that span the northern Gulf of Mexico; and (4) What are the implications of mangrove forest encroachment and development into salt marsh in terms of soil development, carbon and nitrogen storage, and soil strength? To address these questions, we utilized the salt marshes and natural mangrove forest structural gradients present at three distinct locations in the northern Gulf of Mexico: Cedar Key (Florida), Port Fourchon (Louisiana), and Port Aransas (Texas). Each of these locations represents a distinct combination of climate-driven abiotic conditions. We quantified relationships between plant community composition and structure, soil and porewater physicochemical properties, hydroperiod, and climatic conditions. The suite of measurements that we collected provide initial insights into how different geographic areas of an ecotone, with different environmental conditions, may be impacted by mangrove forest expansion and development, and how these changes may alter the supply of specific ecosystem goods and services. \nThis file includes the scanned laboratory notes associated with this project.\nThis work was conducted via a collaborative effort between scientists at the U.S. Geological Survey National Wetland Research Center and the Department of Biology of the University of Louisiana at Lafayette.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P138EI2Z","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.545bf9b3e4b009f8aec9b5a5.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_545bf9b3e4b009f8aec9b5a5","keyword":["Florida","Gulf of Mexico","Louisiana","Texas","USGS:545bf9b3e4b009f8aec9b5a5","climate change","ecology","ecosystem monitoring","environment","forest","mangrove","migration","moisture","soil","wetlands"],"modified":"2026-09-22T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-97.1401, 27.8300, -83.0298, 29.2000","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Laboratory Notes: Scanned Laboratory Notebook Pages for the following project - Ecological implications of mangrove forest migration in the southeastern US (2012-2-13)"},"description":"Winter climate change has the potential to have a large impact on coastal wetlands in the southeastern U.S. Warmer winter temperatures and reductions in the intensity of freeze events would likely lead to mangrove forest range expansion and salt marsh displacement in parts of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic coast. The objective of this research was to better understand some of the ecological implications of mangrove forest migration and salt marsh displacement. The potential ecological effects of mangrove migration are diverse ranging from important biotic impacts (e.g., coastal fisheries, land bird migration; colonial nesting wading birds) to ecosystem stability (e.g., response to sea level rise and drought; habitat loss; coastal protection) to biogeochemical processes (e.g., carbon storage; water quality). In this research, our focus was on the impact of mangrove forest migration on coastal wetland soil processes and the consequent implications for coastal wetland responses to sea level rise, ecosystem resilience, and carbon storage. Our study specifically addressed the following questions: (1) How do ecological processes and ecosystem properties differ between salt marshes and mangrove forests; (2) As mangrove forests develop, how do their ecosystem properties change and how do these properties compare to salt marshes; (3) How do plant-soil interactions across mangrove forest structural gradients differ among three distinct locations that span the northern Gulf of Mexico; and (4) What are the implications of mangrove forest encroachment and development into salt marsh in terms of soil development, carbon and nitrogen storage, and soil strength? To address these questions, we utilized the salt marshes and natural mangrove forest structural gradients present at three distinct locations in the northern Gulf of Mexico: Cedar Key (Florida), Port Fourchon (Louisiana), and Port Aransas (Texas). Each of these locations represents a distinct combination of climate-driven abiotic conditions. We quantified relationships between plant community composition and structure, soil and porewater physicochemical properties, hydroperiod, and climatic conditions. The suite of measurements that we collected provide initial insights into how different geographic areas of an ecotone, with different environmental conditions, may be impacted by mangrove forest expansion and development, and how these changes may alter the supply of specific ecosystem goods and services. \nThis file includes the scanned laboratory notes associated with this project.\nThis work was conducted via a collaborative effort between scientists at the U.S. Geological Survey National Wetland Research Center and the Department of Biology of the University of Louisiana at Lafayette.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/eb9f2a86-118a-49eb-9018-418c24b7ee2f","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/eb9f2a86-118a-49eb-9018-418c24b7ee2f/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_545bf9b3e4b009f8aec9b5a5","keyword":["Florida","Gulf of Mexico","Louisiana","Texas","USGS:545bf9b3e4b009f8aec9b5a5","climate change","ecology","ecosystem monitoring","environment","forest","mangrove","migration","moisture","soil","wetlands"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T00:55:02.982569","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"laboratory-notes-scanned-laboratory-notebook-pages-for-the-following-project-ecological-13","spatial_centroid":{"lat":28.377999999999997,"lon":-91.49598},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-97.1401,27.83],[-97.1401,29.2],[-83.0298,29.2],[-83.0298,27.83],[-97.1401,27.83]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Laboratory Notes: Scanned Laboratory Notebook Pages for the following project - Ecological implications of mangrove forest migration in the southeastern US (2012-2-13)","type":"dataset"},{"_score":30.412125,"_sort":[1790470292050,30.412125,0,"81e5e55c-faeb-46d2-859e-0475af612e5b"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Cody Hudson","hasEmail":"mailto:chudson@intera.com"},"description":"Daily streamflow and reservoir water elevation data for modeled locations in the Red River Basin. Values reported are for 18 different GCM (Global Climate Model) / RCP (Representative Concentration Pathway) / GDM Downscaling scenarios. Climate data from each scenario was input into a Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) model, that output flow values. These values were then input into RiverWare, to determine the impacts on regulated flows, lake levels and water availability. RiverWare was used for this project, because of its ability to simulate water use, reservoir operations, and local/interstate regulations.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.21429/C91599","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.57d84d1ae4b090824ff9ac7b.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_57d84d1ae4b090824ff9ac7b","keyword":["Climate Change","Oklahoma","Red River","RiverWare","USGS:57d84d1ae4b090824ff9ac7b","Water Availability","environment"],"modified":"2026-09-23T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-99.9612, 33.7317, -94.6297, 35.6655","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"RiverWare Daily Simulated values of Streamflow from 2006-2099: Oklahoma"},"description":"Daily streamflow and reservoir water elevation data for modeled locations in the Red River Basin. Values reported are for 18 different GCM (Global Climate Model) / RCP (Representative Concentration Pathway) / GDM Downscaling scenarios. Climate data from each scenario was input into a Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) model, that output flow values. These values were then input into RiverWare, to determine the impacts on regulated flows, lake levels and water availability. RiverWare was used for this project, because of its ability to simulate water use, reservoir operations, and local/interstate regulations.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/59b7ae13-b980-452b-ba0e-ba20a3f31439","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/59b7ae13-b980-452b-ba0e-ba20a3f31439/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_57d84d1ae4b090824ff9ac7b","keyword":["Climate Change","Oklahoma","Red River","RiverWare","USGS:57d84d1ae4b090824ff9ac7b","Water Availability","environment"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T00:51:32.050796","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"riverware-daily-simulated-values-of-streamflow-from-2006-2099-oklahoma","spatial_centroid":{"lat":34.505219999999994,"lon":-97.82860000000001},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-99.9612,33.7317],[-99.9612,35.6655],[-94.6297,35.6655],[-94.6297,33.7317],[-99.9612,33.7317]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"RiverWare Daily Simulated values of Streamflow from 2006-2099: Oklahoma","type":"dataset"},{"_score":12.7874565,"_sort":[1790470223694,12.7874565,0,"0e4b1b8b-5e9b-428f-81cf-9a11eb16240f"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Michael Osland","hasEmail":"mailto:mosland@usgs.gov"},"description":"Winter climate change has the potential to have a large impact on coastal wetlands in the southeastern U.S. Warmer winter temperatures and reductions in the intensity of freeze events would likely lead to mangrove forest range expansion and salt marsh displacement in parts of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic coast. The objective of this research was to better understand some of the ecological implications of mangrove forest migration and salt marsh displacement. The potential ecological effects of mangrove migration are diverse ranging from important biotic impacts (e.g., coastal fisheries, land bird migration; colonial nesting wading birds) to ecosystem stability (e.g., response to sea level rise and drought; habitat loss; coastal protection) to biogeochemical processes (e.g., carbon storage; water quality). In this research, our focus was on the impact of mangrove forest migration on coastal wetland soil processes and the consequent implications for coastal wetland responses to sea level rise, ecosystem resilience, and carbon storage. Our study specifically addressed the following questions: (1) How do ecological processes and ecosystem properties differ between salt marshes and mangrove forests; (2) As mangrove forests develop, how do their ecosystem properties change and how do these properties compare to salt marshes; (3) How do plant-soil interactions across mangrove forest structural gradients differ among three distinct locations that span the northern Gulf of Mexico; and (4) What are the implications of mangrove forest encroachment and development into salt marsh in terms of soil development, carbon and nitrogen storage, and soil strength? To address these questions, we utilized the salt marshes and natural mangrove forest structural gradients present at three distinct locations in the northern Gulf of Mexico: Cedar Key (Florida), Port Fourchon (Louisiana), and Port Aransas (Texas). Each of these locations represents a distinct combination of climate-driven abiotic conditions. We quantified relationships between plant community composition and structure, soil and porewater physicochemical properties, hydroperiod, and climatic conditions. The suite of measurements that we collected provide initial insights into how different geographic areas of an ecotone, with different environmental conditions, may be impacted by mangrove forest expansion and development, and how these changes may alter the supply of specific ecosystem goods and services. \nThis file includes the sub-plot-level small plot vegetation cover data.\nThis work was conducted via a collaborative effort between scientists at the U.S. Geological Survey National Wetland Research Center and the Department of Biology of the University of Louisiana at Lafayette.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P1GDTXUR","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.545cfa50e4b0ba8303f711e2.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_545cfa50e4b0ba8303f711e2","keyword":["Avicennia germinans","Cedar Key","Gulf of Mexico","Port Aransas","Port Fourchon","Spartina alterniflora","State of Florida","State of Louisiana","State of Texas","USGS:545cfa50e4b0ba8303f711e2","United States of America","environment","habitat","vegetation"],"modified":"2026-09-22T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Dataset 6: New vegetation data collection: sub-plot-level small plot cover"},"description":"Winter climate change has the potential to have a large impact on coastal wetlands in the southeastern U.S. Warmer winter temperatures and reductions in the intensity of freeze events would likely lead to mangrove forest range expansion and salt marsh displacement in parts of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic coast. The objective of this research was to better understand some of the ecological implications of mangrove forest migration and salt marsh displacement. The potential ecological effects of mangrove migration are diverse ranging from important biotic impacts (e.g., coastal fisheries, land bird migration; colonial nesting wading birds) to ecosystem stability (e.g., response to sea level rise and drought; habitat loss; coastal protection) to biogeochemical processes (e.g., carbon storage; water quality). In this research, our focus was on the impact of mangrove forest migration on coastal wetland soil processes and the consequent implications for coastal wetland responses to sea level rise, ecosystem resilience, and carbon storage. Our study specifically addressed the following questions: (1) How do ecological processes and ecosystem properties differ between salt marshes and mangrove forests; (2) As mangrove forests develop, how do their ecosystem properties change and how do these properties compare to salt marshes; (3) How do plant-soil interactions across mangrove forest structural gradients differ among three distinct locations that span the northern Gulf of Mexico; and (4) What are the implications of mangrove forest encroachment and development into salt marsh in terms of soil development, carbon and nitrogen storage, and soil strength? To address these questions, we utilized the salt marshes and natural mangrove forest structural gradients present at three distinct locations in the northern Gulf of Mexico: Cedar Key (Florida), Port Fourchon (Louisiana), and Port Aransas (Texas). Each of these locations represents a distinct combination of climate-driven abiotic conditions. We quantified relationships between plant community composition and structure, soil and porewater physicochemical properties, hydroperiod, and climatic conditions. The suite of measurements that we collected provide initial insights into how different geographic areas of an ecotone, with different environmental conditions, may be impacted by mangrove forest expansion and development, and how these changes may alter the supply of specific ecosystem goods and services. \nThis file includes the sub-plot-level small plot vegetation cover data.\nThis work was conducted via a collaborative effort between scientists at the U.S. Geological Survey National Wetland Research Center and the Department of Biology of the University of Louisiana at Lafayette.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/502933c3-d436-43d8-b2bd-631b8518d1ad","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/502933c3-d436-43d8-b2bd-631b8518d1ad/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_545cfa50e4b0ba8303f711e2","keyword":["Avicennia germinans","Cedar Key","Gulf of Mexico","Port Aransas","Port Fourchon","Spartina alterniflora","State of Florida","State of Louisiana","State of Texas","USGS:545cfa50e4b0ba8303f711e2","United States of America","environment","habitat","vegetation"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T00:50:23.694133","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"dataset-6-new-vegetation-data-collection-sub-plot-level-small-plot-cover","spatial_centroid":null,"spatial_shape":null,"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Dataset 6: New vegetation data collection: sub-plot-level small plot cover","type":"dataset"},{"_score":10.513699,"_sort":[1790470177533,10.513699,0,"88a02eff-5b51-4463-898d-71612ec3fce1"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Climate Adaptation Science Centers","hasEmail":"mailto:casc-data@usgs.gov"},"description":"This shapefile contains polygons representing the current range of twelve ecosystems in the southeastern U.S. and the Caribbean. These were the focal ecosystems for the research project. The polygons were created by digitizing a representative area that contained each ecosystem's extent, as defined from GAP land cover or NatureServe's National Map land cover data.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P146ZFNK","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.5488c510e4b02acb4f0c945d.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_5488c510e4b02acb4f0c945d","keyword":["USGS:5488c510e4b02acb4f0c945d","climate change","ecosystems","environment","geospatial datasets","vulnerability"],"modified":"2026-09-22T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-102.45498189, 17.194070518, -56.324313299, 43.809030881","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Current Range Polygons for Twelve Focal Ecosystems of the Southeastern U.S. and Caribbean"},"description":"This shapefile contains polygons representing the current range of twelve ecosystems in the southeastern U.S. and the Caribbean. These were the focal ecosystems for the research project. The polygons were created by digitizing a representative area that contained each ecosystem's extent, as defined from GAP land cover or NatureServe's National Map land cover data.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/5a50de55-19aa-452a-91bc-ce11905cf52c","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/5a50de55-19aa-452a-91bc-ce11905cf52c/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_5488c510e4b02acb4f0c945d","keyword":["USGS:5488c510e4b02acb4f0c945d","climate change","ecosystems","environment","geospatial datasets","vulnerability"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T00:49:37.533290","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"current-range-polygons-for-twelve-focal-ecosystems-of-the-southeastern-u-s-and-caribbean","spatial_centroid":{"lat":27.8400546632,"lon":-84.0027144536},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-102.45498189,17.194070518],[-102.45498189,43.809030881],[-56.324313299,43.809030881],[-56.324313299,17.194070518],[-102.45498189,17.194070518]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Current Range Polygons for Twelve Focal Ecosystems of the Southeastern U.S. and Caribbean","type":"dataset"},{"_score":16.616365,"_sort":[1790470117781,16.616365,0,"b3a2c743-b84e-43d3-aaa9-53443368808e"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Nils Peterson","hasEmail":"mailto:casc-data@usgs.gov"},"description":"Wildlife conservation success depends on regional conservation efforts, but little is known about barriers and opportunities that \u2018boots on the ground\u2019 wildlife conservation practitioners face when tackling regional conservation. This study provides the first data addressing these important questions in the southeastern United States. Surveyed professionals indicated that their top priority for regional conservation efforts was increasing the likelihood of conservation success for species with multi-state ranges, followed by the need to describe threats to species and their habitats. Perhaps not surprisingly, these priority areas were also where conservation practitioners were most likely to work in regional collaborations. The lowest priority for regional conservation efforts was developing plans to adapt conservation actions to climate change, followed by measuring the effectiveness of proposed conservation actions. Developing plans to adapt conservation actions to climate change was also the least likely priority area for conservation practitioners to be currently collaborating and had the least interest for future collaborations. Surveyed professionals indicated that the top barriers they faced in regional conservation projects were participation being too expensive and logistics being too difficult. These results suggest additional funding and simplified protocols for cross-state collaboration may be required to encourage regional conservation initiatives, particularly those perceived as low importance by practitioners.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.21429/ej86-de65","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.659c24dad34e3265ab16277f.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_659c24dad34e3265ab16277f","keyword":["SEAFWA","USGS:659c24dad34e3265ab16277f","attitudes","biota","collaboration","ecosystem management","natural resource management","social sciences"],"modified":"2026-09-23T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-105.8203, 24.0866, -73.8281, 40.1117","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Perceptions of Collaboration Among Wildlife Managers in SEAFWA States Between 2022 - 2023"},"description":"Wildlife conservation success depends on regional conservation efforts, but little is known about barriers and opportunities that \u2018boots on the ground\u2019 wildlife conservation practitioners face when tackling regional conservation. This study provides the first data addressing these important questions in the southeastern United States. Surveyed professionals indicated that their top priority for regional conservation efforts was increasing the likelihood of conservation success for species with multi-state ranges, followed by the need to describe threats to species and their habitats. Perhaps not surprisingly, these priority areas were also where conservation practitioners were most likely to work in regional collaborations. The lowest priority for regional conservation efforts was developing plans to adapt conservation actions to climate change, followed by measuring the effectiveness of proposed conservation actions. Developing plans to adapt conservation actions to climate change was also the least likely priority area for conservation practitioners to be currently collaborating and had the least interest for future collaborations. Surveyed professionals indicated that the top barriers they faced in regional conservation projects were participation being too expensive and logistics being too difficult. These results suggest additional funding and simplified protocols for cross-state collaboration may be required to encourage regional conservation initiatives, particularly those perceived as low importance by practitioners.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/0447175d-0bf9-426f-a6f4-55c4248b0649","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/0447175d-0bf9-426f-a6f4-55c4248b0649/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_659c24dad34e3265ab16277f","keyword":["SEAFWA","USGS:659c24dad34e3265ab16277f","attitudes","biota","collaboration","ecosystem management","natural resource management","social sciences"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T00:48:37.781352","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"perceptions-of-collaboration-among-wildlife-managers-in-seafwa-states-between-2022-2023","spatial_centroid":{"lat":30.496640000000003,"lon":-93.02342000000002},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-105.8203,24.0866],[-105.8203,40.1117],[-73.8281,40.1117],[-73.8281,24.0866],[-105.8203,24.0866]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Perceptions of Collaboration Among Wildlife Managers in SEAFWA States Between 2022 - 2023","type":"dataset"},{"_score":4.6335144,"_sort":[1790469969603,4.6335144,0,"db48b83b-7b91-407f-a98c-879e8c57f7c1"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"USGS Western Fisheries Research Center and US EPA Western Ecology Division, Pacific Coastal Ecology Branch","hasEmail":"mailto:dreusser@usgs.gov"},"description":"The Sea Surface Temperature (SST) data of the nearshore region of the North Pacific show temperature ranges in degrees C using points whose locations correspond to the centroids of AVHRR Pathfinder version 5 monthly, global, 4 km data set (PFSST V50). The pathfinder rasters are available from the Physical Oceanography Distributed Active Archive Center (PO.DAAC), hosted by NASA JPL.  The grid cells in this dataset lie within a 20 km buffer from the GSHHS (Global Self-consistent, Hierarchical, High-resolution Shoreline) coastline. The GSHHS vector data are available from the National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC). These data have been QA'd in that we have selected only data values with associated quality flags of 4-7. Missing data and bad data are given the value = NoData.\nThe monthly mean SST rasters are bundled by year. The files in this bundle span 09/1981 - 12/2009.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P138CXDV","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.586d8347e4b0f5ce109fc9bc.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_586d8347e4b0f5ce109fc9bc","keyword":["1981","1982","1983","1984","1985","1986","1987","1988","1989","1990","1991","1992","1993","1994","1995","1996","1997","1998","1999","2000","2001","2002","2003","2004","2005","2006","2007","2008","2009","AVHRR","Aleutian","April","Asian Pacific","August","BC","British Columbia","CA","California","California Current System","Canada","China","December","East Asia","February","GIS","Gulf of Alaska","January","Japan","July","June","Kamchatka","Korea","Kuroshio","March","May","North America","North Pacific","November","OR","October","Oregon","Oyashio","Pacific Northwest","Pacific Ocean","Pacific coast","Russia","SST","Sea of Okhotsk","September","USGS:586d8347e4b0f5ce109fc9bc","Vancouver","WA","Washington","Yellow Sea","average SST","biota","cell","climate","coast","ecoregion","global","grid","imageryBaseMapsEarthCover","marine","mean SST","month","monthly","monthly mean","oceans","pixel","raster","remote sensing","satellite","sea surface","sea surface temperature","temperature","thermal"],"modified":"2026-09-23T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-178.9453, 20.4345, 179.8217, 63.1930","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"4-km North Pacific Nearshore Sea Surface Temperature (SST) ESRI GRID format (1981-2009)"},"description":"The Sea Surface Temperature (SST) data of the nearshore region of the North Pacific show temperature ranges in degrees C using points whose locations correspond to the centroids of AVHRR Pathfinder version 5 monthly, global, 4 km data set (PFSST V50). The pathfinder rasters are available from the Physical Oceanography Distributed Active Archive Center (PO.DAAC), hosted by NASA JPL.  The grid cells in this dataset lie within a 20 km buffer from the GSHHS (Global Self-consistent, Hierarchical, High-resolution Shoreline) coastline. The GSHHS vector data are available from the National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC). These data have been QA'd in that we have selected only data values with associated quality flags of 4-7. Missing data and bad data are given the value = NoData.\nThe monthly mean SST rasters are bundled by year. The files in this bundle span 09/1981 - 12/2009.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/b3d20b9c-3362-4a31-8e0b-cda095966a2f","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/b3d20b9c-3362-4a31-8e0b-cda095966a2f/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_586d8347e4b0f5ce109fc9bc","keyword":["1981","1982","1983","1984","1985","1986","1987","1988","1989","1990","1991","1992","1993","1994","1995","1996","1997","1998","1999","2000","2001","2002","2003","2004","2005","2006","2007","2008","2009","AVHRR","Aleutian","April","Asian Pacific","August","BC","British Columbia","CA","California","California Current System","Canada","China","December","East Asia","February","GIS","Gulf of Alaska","January","Japan","July","June","Kamchatka","Korea","Kuroshio","March","May","North America","North Pacific","November","OR","October","Oregon","Oyashio","Pacific Northwest","Pacific Ocean","Pacific coast","Russia","SST","Sea of Okhotsk","September","USGS:586d8347e4b0f5ce109fc9bc","Vancouver","WA","Washington","Yellow Sea","average SST","biota","cell","climate","coast","ecoregion","global","grid","imageryBaseMapsEarthCover","marine","mean SST","month","monthly","monthly mean","oceans","pixel","raster","remote sensing","satellite","sea surface","sea surface temperature","temperature","thermal"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T00:46:09.603739","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"4-km-north-pacific-nearshore-sea-surface-temperature-sst-esri-grid-format-1981-2009","spatial_centroid":{"lat":37.5379,"lon":-35.438500000000005},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-178.9453,20.4345],[-178.9453,63.193],[179.8217,63.193],[179.8217,20.4345],[-178.9453,20.4345]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"4-km North Pacific Nearshore Sea Surface Temperature (SST) ESRI GRID format (1981-2009)","type":"dataset"},{"_score":12.525939,"_sort":[1790469857941,12.525939,3,"0924c86d-9210-44f0-83ae-bb9df13e4365"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Baxter E Vieux","hasEmail":"mailto:bvieux@ou.edu"},"description":"The development of a hydrologic foundation, essential for advancing our understanding of flow-ecology relationships, was accomplished using the high-resolution physics-based distributed rainfall-runoff model Vflo. We compared the accuracy and bias associated with flow metrics that were generated using Vflo at both a daily and monthly time step in the Canadian River basin, USA. First, we calibrated and applied bias correction to the Vflo model to simulate streamflow at ungaged catchment locations. Next, flow metrics were calculated using both simulated and observed data from stream gage locations. We found discharge predictions using Vflo were more accurate than using drainage area ratios. General correspondence between predicted discharge and the gage data was apparent; however, flow metrics calculated using the Vflo output did not accurately represent flow variability. \nThis work was part of a multidisciplinary project describing water quality, streamflow and runoff, and ecology of the Canadian River Basin from northeastern New Mexico to Lake Eufaula, Oklahoma. This study was done in cooperation with the South Central Climate Adaptation Science Center.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"http://doi.org/10.5066/P9A7DRPE","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.5cd4491de4b062989a9e92ea.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_5cd4491de4b062989a9e92ea","keyword":["USGS:5cd4491de4b062989a9e92ea","Vflo","biota","distributed modeling","hydro-ecology","hydrology","mathematical modeling","precipitation (atmospheric)","stream discharge","streamflow"],"modified":"2026-09-23T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-103.4334, 34.8119, -96.2428, 36.0540","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Point locations of daily flow rates in the Canadian River watershed derived from hydrologic modeling 1994-2013"},"description":"The development of a hydrologic foundation, essential for advancing our understanding of flow-ecology relationships, was accomplished using the high-resolution physics-based distributed rainfall-runoff model Vflo. We compared the accuracy and bias associated with flow metrics that were generated using Vflo at both a daily and monthly time step in the Canadian River basin, USA. First, we calibrated and applied bias correction to the Vflo model to simulate streamflow at ungaged catchment locations. Next, flow metrics were calculated using both simulated and observed data from stream gage locations. We found discharge predictions using Vflo were more accurate than using drainage area ratios. General correspondence between predicted discharge and the gage data was apparent; however, flow metrics calculated using the Vflo output did not accurately represent flow variability. \nThis work was part of a multidisciplinary project describing water quality, streamflow and runoff, and ecology of the Canadian River Basin from northeastern New Mexico to Lake Eufaula, Oklahoma. This study was done in cooperation with the South Central Climate Adaptation Science Center.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/4c3ee223-4de6-4d51-9137-0860208c7106","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/4c3ee223-4de6-4d51-9137-0860208c7106/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_5cd4491de4b062989a9e92ea","keyword":["USGS:5cd4491de4b062989a9e92ea","Vflo","biota","distributed modeling","hydro-ecology","hydrology","mathematical modeling","precipitation (atmospheric)","stream discharge","streamflow"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T00:44:17.941741","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":3,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"point-locations-of-daily-flow-rates-in-the-canadian-river-watershed-derived-from-1994-2013","spatial_centroid":{"lat":35.30874,"lon":-100.55716},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-103.4334,34.8119],[-103.4334,36.054],[-96.2428,36.054],[-96.2428,34.8119],[-103.4334,34.8119]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Point locations of daily flow rates in the Canadian River watershed derived from hydrologic modeling 1994-2013","type":"dataset"},{"_score":70.5346,"_sort":[1790469795730,70.5346,0,"db510d9f-ae17-4bc4-95e1-594f40fbf189"],"access_level":"public","dcat":{"accessLevel":"public","bureauCode":["010:12"],"contactPoint":{"@type":"vcard:Contact","fn":"Sam Veloz","hasEmail":"mailto:sveloze@pointblue.org"},"description":"These maps indicate the magnitude of multivariate climate change using the standardized Euclidean distance (SED). This metric allows the magnitude of climate change to be analyzed with respect to historical interannual variability for each climate variable. Standardizing climate change in this way allows multiple climate variables with different units to be combined into a single index, but more importantly, it places the magnitude of projected change in the perspective of what species have had to tolerate over recent history. These maps are based on multiple climate models (CanESM2, MIROC5, MIROC_ESM_CHEM, and MRI_CGCM3 climate models) for the periods 2035-2064 and 2070-2099 and are based on bioclimatic variables and seasonal climate variables.","distribution":[{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","accessURL":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P13SX9YL","description":"Landing page for access to the data","format":"XML","mediaType":"application/http","title":"Digital Data"},{"@type":"dcat:Distribution","description":"The metadata original format","downloadURL":"https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.b7f48ee9-18e8-40e2-8ff7-ed504d19d540.xml","format":"XML","mediaType":"text/xml","title":"Original Metadata"}],"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_b7f48ee9-18e8-40e2-8ff7-ed504d19d540","keyword":["Oregon","USGS:b7f48ee9-18e8-40e2-8ff7-ed504d19d540","Washington","biota","climate change","environment","external research support","geospatial datasets","modeling"],"modified":"2026-09-21T00:00:00Z","publisher":{"@type":"org:Organization","name":"U.S. Geological Survey"},"spatial":"-124.7708, 41.8958, -116.3542, 49.0208","theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Climate Change Maps for a Species Perspective -  magnitude of multivariate climate change modeled for 2035-2064 and 2070-2099"},"description":"These maps indicate the magnitude of multivariate climate change using the standardized Euclidean distance (SED). This metric allows the magnitude of climate change to be analyzed with respect to historical interannual variability for each climate variable. Standardizing climate change in this way allows multiple climate variables with different units to be combined into a single index, but more importantly, it places the magnitude of projected change in the perspective of what species have had to tolerate over recent history. These maps are based on multiple climate models (CanESM2, MIROC5, MIROC_ESM_CHEM, and MRI_CGCM3 climate models) for the periods 2035-2064 and 2070-2099 and are based on bioclimatic variables and seasonal climate variables.","distribution_titles":["Digital Data","Original Metadata"],"harvest_record":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/165fae2b-ca71-4cc8-b408-d7b099a84f16","harvest_record_raw":"https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/165fae2b-ca71-4cc8-b408-d7b099a84f16/raw","has_download":true,"has_spatial":true,"identifier":"http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_b7f48ee9-18e8-40e2-8ff7-ed504d19d540","keyword":["Oregon","USGS:b7f48ee9-18e8-40e2-8ff7-ed504d19d540","Washington","biota","climate change","environment","external research support","geospatial datasets","modeling"],"last_harvested_date":"2026-09-27T00:43:15.730549","organization":{"aliases":["dept"],"code_repo_exempt":false,"code_repo_url":null,"description":null,"id":"143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8","logo":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png","name":"Department of the Interior","organization_type":"Federal Government","slug":"doi"},"parent_identifier":null,"popularity":0,"publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","slug":"climate-change-maps-for-a-species-perspective-magnitude-of-multivariate-climate--2070-2099","spatial_centroid":{"lat":44.7458,"lon":-121.40416},"spatial_shape":{"coordinates":[[[-124.7708,41.8958],[-124.7708,49.0208],[-116.3542,49.0208],[-116.3542,41.8958],[-124.7708,41.8958]]],"type":"Polygon"},"theme":["geospatial"],"title":"Climate Change Maps for a Species Perspective -  magnitude of multivariate climate change modeled for 2035-2064 and 2070-2099","type":"dataset"}],"sort":"last_harvested_date"}
