Timeline / Data.gov — Environment Datasets

changed Source changed

A new raw object was archived. Both versions are preserved. 5553 line(s) added, 5934 line(s) removed.

Evidence

What changed derived

This diff is not evidence. It was produced by civic-memory.diff_engine 1.1.0 at 2026-10-01T00:20:05+00:00 by normalizing the two archived objects above. The objects are authoritative; this reading of them can be regenerated or deleted without loss. 5553 line(s) added, 5934 line(s) removed.

--- previous
+++ current
@@ -1,213 +1,126 @@
 {
- "after": "WzE3OTA3MTkzOTE1NzgsNC42NzcxODgsOCwiYzY3MmZlNTctNmQ2OC00ZjE1LTllZGEtY2ExYjU3ZWRhMmU2Il0=",
+ "after": "WzE3OTA3OTQzODk0ODQsNi41MDc0MTIsMywiZTg4OTdiNWEtMzNjYi00OTJjLThlZTgtZDcwMWEwMDMwOGZjIl0=",
  "results": [
  {
- "_score": 14.610441,
+ "_score": 10.901823,
  "_sort": [
- 1790781201037,
- 14.610441,
- 4,
- "dbc91636-c6a4-4ef1-b1f9-1538a6fb9ea7"
+ 1790803985472,
+ 10.901823,
+ 1,
+ "1bfd56b2-c4cd-4ce2-b2a5-f667ea04bb47"
  ],
  "dcat": {
- "@type": "Dataset",
- "accessRights": "Public",
- "accrualPeriodicity": "annually",
+ "@type": "dcat:Dataset",
+ "accessLevel": "public",
  "bureauCode": [
- "025:00"
+ "005:96"
  ],
  "contactPoint": {
- "@type": "vcard:Kind",
- "fn": "HUD GIS Helpdesk",
- "hasEmail": "mailto:GIShelpdesk@hud.gov"
- },
- "describedBy": {
- "@id": "https://www.arcgis.com/sharing/rest/content/items/c1c32742599a42c9a45c95be50ed2ab6/info/metadata/metadata.xml?format=default",
- "@type": "foaf:Document",
- "mediaType": "XML document",
- "title": "Source metadata"
- },
- "description": "The Location Affordability Index (LAI) helps to better understand the combined cost of housing and transportation. First launched by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and Department of Transportation (DOT) in November 2013, the LAI provides ubiquitous, standardized household housing and transportation cost estimates at the Census block-group level for the majority of the populated area of the United States. Because what is affordable is different for everyone, users can choose among eight household profiles—which vary by household income, size, and number of commuters—and see the impact of the built environment on affordability in a given neighborhood location while holding household demographics constant. First\nlaunched by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and\nDepartment of Transportation (DOT) in November 2013, the Location Affordability\nIndex (LAI) provides ubiquitous, standardized household housing and\ntransportation cost estimates at the Census block-group level for the majority\nof the populated area of the United States. Because what is affordable is\ndifferent for everyone, users can choose among eight household profiles—which\nvary by household income, size, and number of commuters—and see the impact of\nthe built environment on affordability in a given neighborhood location while\nholding household demographics constant.\n\nIn\nVersion 1, these estimates were originally generated with data from several\nfederal sources and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) data from Illinois EPA using\nseparate OLS regression models for household housing costs, VMT, car ownership,\nand transit usage. Version 2, in addition to updating all the constituent data\nsources, represents\na significant a methodological and technical advance from Version 1, modelling\nauto ownership, housing costs, and transit usage for both homeowners and\nrenters are concurrently using simultaneous equation modeling (SEM) to capture\nthe interrelationship of these factors. The inputs to the SEM include these six\nendogenous variables and 18 exogenous variables, with VMT still modeled\nseparately due to data limitations.\n\nTo learn more about the Location Affordability Index (v.2.0) visit: https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/location-affordability-index/, for questions about the spatial attribution of this dataset, please reach out to us at GISHelpdesk@hud.gov.\nData Dictionary: DD_Location Affordability Indev v.2.0\nDate of Coverage: 2008-2012",
+ "@type": "vcard:Contact",
+ "fn": "USFSEnterpriseContent",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:SM.FS.data@usda.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "The Forest Service's Natural Resource Manager (NRM) Forest Activity Tracking System (FACTS) is the agency standard for managing information aboutactivities related to fire/fuels, silviculture, and invasive species. FACTS is an activity tracking application for all levels of the Forest Service. The application allows tracking and monitoring of NEPA decisions as well as the ability to create and manage KV trust fund plans at the timber sale level. This application complements its companion NRM applications, which cover the spectrum of living and non-living natural resource information. This layer represents Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration (CFLR) Program project activities. Also included are other High Priority Restoration projects that are funded outside of CFLR. It is important to note that this layer does not contain all of the approved project activities. Instead, these are the accomplishments that project groups uploaded to the Forest Service corporate data holdings in FACTS. As spatial data is a new requirement for the program, improvements to the quality and comprehensiveness of this data is expected in coming years. <a href='https://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/edw/edw_resources/meta/S_USA.Activity_CFLRP_PT.xml' target='_blank' rel='nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer'>Metadata</a>",
  "distribution": [
  {
- "@type": "dcat:DataService",
- "accessURL": "https://services.arcgis.com/VTyQ9soqVukalItT/arcgis/rest/services/Location_Affordability_Index_2_0/FeatureServer/12",
- "downloadURL": "https://services.arcgis.com/VTyQ9soqVukalItT/arcgis/rest/services/Location_Affordability_Index_2_0/FeatureServer/12",
- "format": "GeoServices REST",
- "mediaType": "GeoServices REST",
- "title": "ArcGIS REST service"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/c1c32742599a42c9a45c95be50ed2ab6/csv?layers=12",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/c1c32742599a42c9a45c95be50ed2ab6/csv?layers=12",
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://apps.fs.usda.gov/arcx/rest/services/EDW/EDW_CFLRProjectAccomplishments_01/MapServer/2",
+ "format": "ArcGIS GeoServices REST API",
+ "mediaType": "application/json",
+ "title": "ArcGIS GeoService"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/b5d77a243f984511a22e7377479cca41/csv?layers=2",
  "format": "CSV",
- "mediaType": "ftype/CSV",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
  "title": "CSV"
  },
  {
  "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/c1c32742599a42c9a45c95be50ed2ab6/excel?layers=12",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/c1c32742599a42c9a45c95be50ed2ab6/excel?layers=12",
- "format": "Excel",
- "mediaType": "ftype/XLSX",
- "title": "XLSX"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/c1c32742599a42c9a45c95be50ed2ab6/featureCollection?layers=12",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/c1c32742599a42c9a45c95be50ed2ab6/featureCollection?layers=12",
- "format": "Feature Collection",
- "mediaType": "ftype/TXT",
- "title": "TXT"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/c1c32742599a42c9a45c95be50ed2ab6/filegdb?layers=12",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/c1c32742599a42c9a45c95be50ed2ab6/filegdb?layers=12",
- "format": "File Geodatabase",
- "mediaType": "ftype/ZIP",
- "title": "ZIP"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/c1c32742599a42c9a45c95be50ed2ab6/geoPackage?layers=12",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/c1c32742599a42c9a45c95be50ed2ab6/geoPackage?layers=12",
- "format": "GeoPackage",
- "mediaType": "ftype/GPKG",
- "title": "GPKG"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/c1c32742599a42c9a45c95be50ed2ab6/geojson?layers=12",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/c1c32742599a42c9a45c95be50ed2ab6/geojson?layers=12",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/b5d77a243f984511a22e7377479cca41/geojson?layers=2",
  "format": "GeoJSON",
- "mediaType": "ftype/GEOJSON",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.geo+json",
  "title": "GeoJSON"
  },
  {
  "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/c1c32742599a42c9a45c95be50ed2ab6/kml?layers=12",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/c1c32742599a42c9a45c95be50ed2ab6/kml?layers=12",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/b5d77a243f984511a22e7377479cca41/kml?layers=2",
  "format": "KML",
- "mediaType": "ftype/KML",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.google-earth.kml+xml",
  "title": "KML"
  },
  {
  "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/c1c32742599a42c9a45c95be50ed2ab6/shapefile?layers=12",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/c1c32742599a42c9a45c95be50ed2ab6/shapefile?layers=12",
- "format": "Shapefile",
- "mediaType": "ftype/ZIP",
- "title": "ZIP"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/c1c32742599a42c9a45c95be50ed2ab6/sqlite?layers=12",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/c1c32742599a42c9a45c95be50ed2ab6/sqlite?layers=12",
- "format": "SQLite Geodatabase",
- "mediaType": "ftype/GDB",
- "title": "GDB"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/HUD::location-affordability-index-v-2-0",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/HUD::location-affordability-index-v-2-0",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/b5d77a243f984511a22e7377479cca41/shapefile?layers=2",
+ "format": "ZIP",
+ "mediaType": "application/zip",
+ "title": "Shapefile"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/usfs::collaborative-forest-landscape-restoration-program-point-feature-layer",
  "format": "Web Page",
- "mediaType": "ftype/HTML",
+ "mediaType": "text/html",
  "title": "ArcGIS Hub Dataset"
  },
  {
  "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=c1c32742599a42c9a45c95be50ed2ab6&sublayer=12",
- "downloadURL": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=c1c32742599a42c9a45c95be50ed2ab6&sublayer=12",
- "format": "A data layer is used to access and display data in a map or scene. Layers support ready-to-use properties and settings of data services.",
- "mediaType": "ftype/HTML",
- "title": "ArcGIS Data Layer"
+ "accessURL": "https://www.arcgis.com/sharing/rest/content/items/b5d77a243f984511a22e7377479cca41/info/metadata/metadata.xml?format=iso19139",
+ "conformsTo": "https://www.isotc211.org/2005/gmi",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "ISO-19139 metadata"
  }
  ],
- "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=c1c32742599a42c9a45c95be50ed2ab6",
- "issued": "2023-07-31",
- "keyword": [
- "Boundaries",
- "CPD",
- "Community Planning and Development",
- "DOT",
- "Economy",
- "Governmental Units",
- "HUD",
- "LAI",
- "Location",
- "Location Affordability",
- "Society",
- "US Department of Housing and Urban Development",
- "US Department of Transportation",
- "and Administrative and Statistical Boundaries",
- "hud.official.content"
- ],
- "landingPage": {
- "@id": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/HUD::location-affordability-index-v-2-0",
- "@type": "Document",
- "title": "Location Affordability Index v 2.0 landing page"
- },
- "modified": "2023-07-31T15:42:29.487Z",
+ "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=b5d77a243f984511a22e7377479cca41&sublayer=2",
+ "issued": "2017-03-27",
+ "keyword": [
+ "CFLR",
+ "Environment",
+ "HRP",
+ "Lands and Realty",
+ "Open Data"
+ ],
+ "landingPage": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/usfs::collaborative-forest-landscape-restoration-program-point-feature-layer",
+ "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
+ "modified": "2026-09-23",
  "programCode": [
- "025:000"
- ],
+ "005:059"
+ ],
+ "progressCode": "onGoing",
  "publisher": {
- "@type": "org:Organization",
- "name": "Office of Policy Development and Research, GIS Helpdesk and Open Data Division",
- "subOrganizationOf": [
- {
- "@type": "org:Organization",
- "name": "U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development"
- }
- ]
- },
- "rights": [
- "HUD and the dataset and metadata authors assume no responsibility for the use or misuse of the dataset. No warranty, expressed or implied is made with regard to the accuracy of the spatial accuracy, and no liability is assumed by the U.S. Government in general, the dataset creators or the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development specifically, as to the spatial or attribute accuracy of the data."
- ],
- "spatial": "{\"@type\": \"Location\", \"bbox\": {\"coordinates\": [[[-179.147339, 71.390482], [179.778467, 71.390482], [179.778467, -14.548699], [-179.147339, -14.548699], [-179.147339, 71.390482]]], \"type\": \"Polygon\"}, \"prefLabel\": \"United States and Minor Outlying Islands\"}",
- "title": "Location Affordability Index v 2.0"
- },
- "description": "The Location Affordability Index (LAI) helps to better understand the combined cost of housing and transportation. First launched by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and Department of Transportation (DOT) in November 2013, the LAI provides ubiquitous, standardized household housing and transportation cost estimates at the Census block-group level for the majority of the populated area of the United States. Because what is affordable is different for everyone, users can choose among eight household profiles—which vary by household income, size, and number of commuters—and see the impact of the built environment on affordability in a given neighborhood location while holding household demographics constant. First\nlaunched by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and\nDepartment of Transportation (DOT) in November 2013, the Location Affordability\nIndex (LAI) provides ubiquitous, standardized household housing and\ntransportation cost estimates at the Census block-group level for the majority\nof the populated area of the United States. Because what is affordable is\ndifferent for everyone, users can choose among eight household profiles—which\nvary by household income, size, and number of commuters—and see the impact of\nthe built environment on affordability in a given neighborhood location while\nholding household demographics constant.\n\nIn\nVersion 1, these estimates were originally generated with data from several\nfederal sources and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) data from Illinois EPA using\nseparate OLS regression models for household housing costs, VMT, car ownership,\nand transit usage. Version 2, in addition to updating all the constituent data\nsources, represents\na significant a methodological and technical advance from Version 1, modelling\nauto ownership, housing costs, and transit usage for both homeowners and\nrenters are concurrently using simultaneous equation modeling (SEM) to capture\nthe interrelationship of these factors. The inputs to the SEM include these six\nendogenous variables and 18 exogenous variables, with VMT still modeled\nseparately due to data limitations.\n\nTo learn more about the Location Affordability Index (v.2.0) visit: https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/location-affordability-index/, for questions about the spatial attribution of this dataset, please reach out to us at GISHelpdesk@hud.gov.\nData Dictionary: DD_Location Affordability Indev v.2.0\nDate of Coverage: 2008-2012",
+ "name": "U.S. Forest Service",
+ "source": "U.S. Forest Service"
+ },
+ "spatial": "-121.7047,30.9311,-88.8414,47.9465",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program: Point (Feature Layer)"
+ },
+ "description": "The Forest Service's Natural Resource Manager (NRM) Forest Activity Tracking System (FACTS) is the agency standard for managing information aboutactivities related to fire/fuels, silviculture, and invasive species. FACTS is an activity tracking application for all levels of the Forest Service. The application allows tracking and monitoring of NEPA decisions as well as the ability to create and manage KV trust fund plans at the timber sale level. This application complements its companion NRM applications, which cover the spectrum of living and non-living natural resource information. This layer represents Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration (CFLR) Program project activities. Also included are other High Priority Restoration projects that are funded outside of CFLR. It is important to note that this layer does not contain all of the approved project activities. Instead, these are the accomplishments that project groups uploaded to the Forest Service corporate data holdings in FACTS. As spatial data is a new requirement for the program, improvements to the quality and comprehensiveness of this data is expected in coming years. <a href='https://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/edw/edw_resources/meta/S_USA.Activity_CFLRP_PT.xml' target='_blank' rel='nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer'>Metadata</a>",
  "distribution_titles": [
- "ArcGIS REST service",
+ "ArcGIS GeoService",
  "CSV",
- "XLSX",
- "TXT",
- "ZIP",
- "GPKG",
  "GeoJSON",
  "KML",
- "ZIP",
- "GDB",
+ "Shapefile",
  "ArcGIS Hub Dataset",
- "ArcGIS Data Layer"
- ],
- "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/3878dc47-e850-4771-b27c-6663ae2076f3",
- "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/3878dc47-e850-4771-b27c-6663ae2076f3/raw",
- "has_download": true,
+ "ISO-19139 metadata"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/37538bb1-2626-4833-9db7-34834317971a",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/37538bb1-2626-4833-9db7-34834317971a/raw",
+ "has_download": false,
  "has_spatial": true,
- "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=c1c32742599a42c9a45c95be50ed2ab6",
- "keyword": [
- "Boundaries",
- "CPD",
- "Community Planning and Development",
- "DOT",
- "Economy",
- "Governmental Units",
- "HUD",
- "LAI",
- "Location",
- "Location Affordability",
- "Society",
- "US Department of Housing and Urban Development",
- "US Department of Transportation",
- "and Administrative and Statistical Boundaries",
- "hud.official.content"
- ],
- "last_harvested_date": "2026-09-30T15:13:21.037246",
+ "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=b5d77a243f984511a22e7377479cca41&sublayer=2",
+ "keyword": [
+ "CFLR",
+ "Environment",
+ "HRP",
+ "Lands and Realty",
+ "Open Data"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-09-30T21:33:05.472828",
  "organization": {
  "aliases": [
  "dept"
@@ -215,280 +128,181 @@
  "code_repo_exempt": false,
  "code_repo_url": null,
  "description": null,
- "id": "7f8ee588-32a3-4b6c-b435-d6603c91dbcc",
- "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/hud.png",
- "name": "Department of Housing and Urban Development",
+ "id": "352b4532-793d-4075-a03f-05b778a3c43a",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/usda.png",
+ "name": "Department of Agriculture",
  "organization_type": "Federal Government",
- "slug": "hud"
+ "slug": "usda"
  },
  "parent_identifier": null,
- "popularity": 4,
- "publisher": "Office of Policy Development and Research, GIS Helpdesk and Open Data Division",
- "slug": "location-affordability-index-v-2-0",
+ "popularity": 1,
+ "publisher": "U.S. Forest Service",
+ "slug": "collaborative-forest-landscape-restoration-program-point-feature-layer",
  "spatial_centroid": {
- "lat": 28.420891500000003,
- "lon": 0.2114917000000048
+ "lat": 37.737260000000006,
+ "lon": -108.55938
  },
  "spatial_shape": {
  "coordinates": [
  [
  [
- [
- -179.147339,
- 71.390482
- ],
- [
- -180.0,
- 71.390482
- ],
- [
- -180.0,
- -14.548699
- ],
- [
- -179.147339,
- -14.548699
- ],
- [
- -179.147339,
- 71.390482
+ -121.7047,
+ 30.9311
+ ],
+ [
+ -121.7047,
+ 47.9465
+ ],
+ [
+ -88.8414,
+ 47.9465
+ ],
+ [
+ -88.8414,
+ 30.9311
+ ],
+ [
+ -121.7047,
+ 30.9311
  ]
  ]
  ],
- [
- [
- [
- 180.0,
- -14.548699
- ],
- [
- 180.0,
- 71.390482
- ],
- [
- 179.778467,
- 71.390482
- ],
- [
- 179.778467,
- -14.548699
- ],
- [
- 180.0,
- -14.548699
- ]
- ]
- ]
- ],
- "type": "MultiPolygon"
- },
- "theme": [],
- "title": "Location Affordability Index v 2.0",
+ "type": "Polygon"
+ },
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program: Point (Feature Layer)",
  "type": "dataset"
  },
  {
- "_score": 15.052649,
+ "_score": 9.371992,
  "_sort": [
- 1790781200785,
- 15.052649,
- 15,
- "9491a739-216e-4c92-bdfc-feebc6bbe756"
+ 1790803981783,
+ 9.371992,
+ 1,
+ "593f2614-552c-49b8-b03e-aff17bce9b27"
  ],
  "dcat": {
- "@type": "Dataset",
- "accessRights": "Public",
- "accrualPeriodicity": "asNeeded",
+ "@type": "dcat:Dataset",
+ "accessLevel": "public",
  "bureauCode": [
- "025:00"
+ "005:96"
  ],
  "contactPoint": {
- "@type": "vcard:Kind",
- "fn": "HUD GIS Helpdesk",
- "hasEmail": "mailto:GIShelpdesk@hud.gov"
- },
- "describedBy": {
- "@id": "https://www.arcgis.com/sharing/rest/content/items/b7ffe3607e8c4212bf7cf2428208dbb6/info/metadata/metadata.xml?format=default",
- "@type": "foaf:Document",
- "mediaType": "XML document",
- "title": "Source metadata"
- },
- "description": "The Location Affordability Index (LAI) helps to better understand the combined cost of housing and transportation. First launched by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and Department of Transportation (DOT) in November 2013, the LAI provides ubiquitous, standardized household housing and transportation cost estimates for all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Because what is affordable is different for everyone, users can choose among eight household profiles—which vary by household income, size, and number of commuters—and see the impact of the built environment on affordability in a given location while holding household demographics constant. First\nlaunched by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and\nDepartment of Transportation (DOT) in November 2013, the Location Affordability\nIndex (LAI) provides ubiquitous, standardized household housing and\ntransportation cost estimates for all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Because\nwhat is affordable is different for everyone, users can choose among eight household\nprofiles—which vary by household income, size, and number of commuters—and see\nthe impact of the built environment on affordability in a given location while\nholding household demographics constant.\n\nVersion\n3 updates the constituent data sets with 2012-2016 American Community Survey\ndata and makes several methodological tweaks, most notably moving to modeling\nat the Census tract level rather at the block group. As with Version 2, the\ninputs to the simultaneous equation model (SEM) include six endogenous variables—housing\ncosts, car ownership, and transit usage for both owners and renters—and 18\nexogenous variables, with vehicle miles traveled still modeled separately due\nto data limitations. To learn more about the Location Affordability Index (v.3) visit: https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/location-affordability-index/, for questions about the spatial attribution of this dataset, please reach out to us at GISHelpdesk@hud.gov. Date of Coverage: 2012-2016 Data Dictionary: DD_Location Affordability Indev v.3.0 LAI Version 3 Data and Methodology LAI Version 3 Technical Documentation",
+ "@type": "vcard:Contact",
+ "fn": "USFSEnterpriseContent",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:SM.FS.data@usda.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "Depicts the area of activities funded through the NFRR Budget Line Item and reported through the FACTS database. (The activities fall under number of acres treated annually to sustain or restore watershed function: acres of forestlands treated using timber sales, acres of forestland vegetation improved, acres of forestland vegetation established, acres of rangeland vegetation improved, acres treated for noxious weeds/invasive plants on NFS lands, and acres of hazardous fuels treated outside the wildland/urban interface (WUI) to reduce the risk of catastrophic wildland fire) and are self-reported by Forest Service Units. <a href='https://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/edw/edw_resources/meta/S_USA.Activity_IRR_PT.xml' target='_blank' rel='nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer'>Metadata</a>",
  "distribution": [
  {
- "@type": "dcat:DataService",
- "accessURL": "https://services.arcgis.com/VTyQ9soqVukalItT/arcgis/rest/services/Location_Affordability_Index_v3/FeatureServer/0",
- "downloadURL": "https://services.arcgis.com/VTyQ9soqVukalItT/arcgis/rest/services/Location_Affordability_Index_v3/FeatureServer/0",
- "format": "GeoServices REST",
- "mediaType": "GeoServices REST",
- "title": "ArcGIS REST service"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/b7ffe3607e8c4212bf7cf2428208dbb6/csv?layers=0",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/b7ffe3607e8c4212bf7cf2428208dbb6/csv?layers=0",
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://apps.fs.usda.gov/arcx/rest/services/EDW/EDW_IRR_01/MapServer/1",
+ "format": "ArcGIS GeoServices REST API",
+ "mediaType": "application/json",
+ "title": "ArcGIS GeoService"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/d6c7b19ee3d54f42b53fad7d8233a3e0/csv?layers=1",
  "format": "CSV",
- "mediaType": "ftype/CSV",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
  "title": "CSV"
  },
  {
  "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/b7ffe3607e8c4212bf7cf2428208dbb6/excel?layers=0",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/b7ffe3607e8c4212bf7cf2428208dbb6/excel?layers=0",
- "format": "Excel",
- "mediaType": "ftype/XLSX",
- "title": "XLSX"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/b7ffe3607e8c4212bf7cf2428208dbb6/featureCollection?layers=0",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/b7ffe3607e8c4212bf7cf2428208dbb6/featureCollection?layers=0",
- "format": "Feature Collection",
- "mediaType": "ftype/TXT",
- "title": "TXT"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/b7ffe3607e8c4212bf7cf2428208dbb6/filegdb?layers=0",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/b7ffe3607e8c4212bf7cf2428208dbb6/filegdb?layers=0",
- "format": "File Geodatabase",
- "mediaType": "ftype/ZIP",
- "title": "ZIP"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/b7ffe3607e8c4212bf7cf2428208dbb6/geoPackage?layers=0",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/b7ffe3607e8c4212bf7cf2428208dbb6/geoPackage?layers=0",
- "format": "GeoPackage",
- "mediaType": "ftype/GPKG",
- "title": "GPKG"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/b7ffe3607e8c4212bf7cf2428208dbb6/geojson?layers=0",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/b7ffe3607e8c4212bf7cf2428208dbb6/geojson?layers=0",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/d6c7b19ee3d54f42b53fad7d8233a3e0/geojson?layers=1",
  "format": "GeoJSON",
- "mediaType": "ftype/GEOJSON",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.geo+json",
  "title": "GeoJSON"
  },
  {
  "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/b7ffe3607e8c4212bf7cf2428208dbb6/kml?layers=0",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/b7ffe3607e8c4212bf7cf2428208dbb6/kml?layers=0",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/d6c7b19ee3d54f42b53fad7d8233a3e0/kml?layers=1",
  "format": "KML",
- "mediaType": "ftype/KML",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.google-earth.kml+xml",
  "title": "KML"
  },
  {
  "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/b7ffe3607e8c4212bf7cf2428208dbb6/shapefile?layers=0",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/b7ffe3607e8c4212bf7cf2428208dbb6/shapefile?layers=0",
- "format": "Shapefile",
- "mediaType": "ftype/ZIP",
- "title": "ZIP"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/b7ffe3607e8c4212bf7cf2428208dbb6/sqlite?layers=0",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/b7ffe3607e8c4212bf7cf2428208dbb6/sqlite?layers=0",
- "format": "SQLite Geodatabase",
- "mediaType": "ftype/GDB",
- "title": "GDB"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/HUD::location-affordability-index-v-3",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/HUD::location-affordability-index-v-3",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/d6c7b19ee3d54f42b53fad7d8233a3e0/shapefile?layers=1",
+ "format": "ZIP",
+ "mediaType": "application/zip",
+ "title": "Shapefile"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/usfs::integrated-resource-restoration-irr-point-feature-layer",
  "format": "Web Page",
- "mediaType": "ftype/HTML",
+ "mediaType": "text/html",
  "title": "ArcGIS Hub Dataset"
  },
  {
  "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=b7ffe3607e8c4212bf7cf2428208dbb6&sublayer=0",
- "downloadURL": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=b7ffe3607e8c4212bf7cf2428208dbb6&sublayer=0",
- "format": "A data layer is used to access and display data in a map or scene. Layers support ready-to-use properties and settings of data services.",
- "mediaType": "ftype/HTML",
- "title": "ArcGIS Data Layer"
+ "accessURL": "https://www.arcgis.com/sharing/rest/content/items/d6c7b19ee3d54f42b53fad7d8233a3e0/info/metadata/metadata.xml?format=iso19139",
+ "conformsTo": "https://www.isotc211.org/2005/gmi",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "ISO-19139 metadata"
  }
  ],
- "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=b7ffe3607e8c4212bf7cf2428208dbb6",
- "issued": "2025-01-24",
- "keyword": [
- "Boundaries",
- "CPD",
- "Community Planning and Development",
- "DOT",
- "Economy",
- "HUD",
- "LAI",
- "Location",
- "Location Affordability",
- "Society",
- "US Department of Housing and Urban Development",
- "US Department of Transportation",
- "hud.official.content"
- ],
- "landingPage": {
- "@id": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/HUD::location-affordability-index-v-3",
- "@type": "Document",
- "title": "Location Affordability Index v.3 landing page"
- },
- "modified": "2025-04-09T22:18:49.842Z",
+ "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=d6c7b19ee3d54f42b53fad7d8233a3e0&sublayer=1",
+ "issued": "2017-05-03",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Activities",
+ "Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration",
+ "Ecosystem Resoration",
+ "Forest Management",
+ "Open Data",
+ "Priority Forest Landscapes",
+ "US Forest Service",
+ "Vegetation Mangement",
+ "environment"
+ ],
+ "landingPage": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/usfs::integrated-resource-restoration-irr-point-feature-layer",
+ "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
+ "modified": "2026-09-24",
  "programCode": [
- "025:000"
- ],
+ "005:059"
+ ],
+ "progressCode": "onGoing",
  "publisher": {
- "@type": "org:Organization",
- "name": "Office of Policy Development and Research, GIS Helpdesk and Open Data Division",
- "subOrganizationOf": [
- {
- "@type": "org:Organization",
- "name": "U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development"
- }
- ]
- },
- "rights": [
- "HUD and the dataset and metadata authors assume no responsibility for the use or misuse of the dataset. No warranty, expressed or implied is made with regard to the accuracy of the spatial accuracy, and no liability is assumed by the U.S. Government in general, the dataset creators or the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development specifically, as to the spatial or attribute accuracy of the data."
- ],
- "spatial": "{\"@type\": \"Location\", \"bbox\": {\"coordinates\": [[[-179.147339, 71.390482], [179.778467, 71.390482], [179.778467, 17.881327], [-179.147339, 17.881327], [-179.147339, 71.390482]]], \"type\": \"Polygon\"}, \"prefLabel\": \"United States and Minor Outlying Islands\"}",
- "title": "Location Affordability Index v.3"
- },
- "description": "The Location Affordability Index (LAI) helps to better understand the combined cost of housing and transportation. First launched by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and Department of Transportation (DOT) in November 2013, the LAI provides ubiquitous, standardized household housing and transportation cost estimates for all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Because what is affordable is different for everyone, users can choose among eight household profiles—which vary by household income, size, and number of commuters—and see the impact of the built environment on affordability in a given location while holding household demographics constant. First\nlaunched by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and\nDepartment of Transportation (DOT) in November 2013, the Location Affordability\nIndex (LAI) provides ubiquitous, standardized household housing and\ntransportation cost estimates for all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Because\nwhat is affordable is different for everyone, users can choose among eight household\nprofiles—which vary by household income, size, and number of commuters—and see\nthe impact of the built environment on affordability in a given location while\nholding household demographics constant.\n\nVersion\n3 updates the constituent data sets with 2012-2016 American Community Survey\ndata and makes several methodological tweaks, most notably moving to modeling\nat the Census tract level rather at the block group. As with Version 2, the\ninputs to the simultaneous equation model (SEM) include six endogenous variables—housing\ncosts, car ownership, and transit usage for both owners and renters—and 18\nexogenous variables, with vehicle miles traveled still modeled separately due\nto data limitations. To learn more about the Location Affordability Index (v.3) visit: https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/location-affordability-index/, for questions about the spatial attribution of this dataset, please reach out to us at GISHelpdesk@hud.gov. Date of Coverage: 2012-2016 Data Dictionary: DD_Location Affordability Indev v.3.0 LAI Version 3 Data and Methodology LAI Version 3 Technical Documentation",
+ "name": "U.S. Forest Service",
+ "source": "U.S. Forest Service"
+ },
+ "spatial": "-119.6122,37.4935,-109.9293,48.9684",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Integrated Resource Restoration (IRR): Point (Feature Layer)"
+ },
+ "description": "Depicts the area of activities funded through the NFRR Budget Line Item and reported through the FACTS database. (The activities fall under number of acres treated annually to sustain or restore watershed function: acres of forestlands treated using timber sales, acres of forestland vegetation improved, acres of forestland vegetation established, acres of rangeland vegetation improved, acres treated for noxious weeds/invasive plants on NFS lands, and acres of hazardous fuels treated outside the wildland/urban interface (WUI) to reduce the risk of catastrophic wildland fire) and are self-reported by Forest Service Units. <a href='https://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/edw/edw_resources/meta/S_USA.Activity_IRR_PT.xml' target='_blank' rel='nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer'>Metadata</a>",
  "distribution_titles": [
- "ArcGIS REST service",
+ "ArcGIS GeoService",
  "CSV",
- "XLSX",
- "TXT",
- "ZIP",
- "GPKG",
  "GeoJSON",
  "KML",
- "ZIP",
- "GDB",
+ "Shapefile",
  "ArcGIS Hub Dataset",
- "ArcGIS Data Layer"
- ],
- "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/50d500fd-de74-4f2e-8552-9ba57586bb07",
- "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/50d500fd-de74-4f2e-8552-9ba57586bb07/raw",
- "has_download": true,
+ "ISO-19139 metadata"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/5ef15a70-173f-4546-aed4-0e8ab0e03245",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/5ef15a70-173f-4546-aed4-0e8ab0e03245/raw",
+ "has_download": false,
  "has_spatial": true,
- "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=b7ffe3607e8c4212bf7cf2428208dbb6",
- "keyword": [
- "Boundaries",
- "CPD",
- "Community Planning and Development",
- "DOT",
- "Economy",
- "HUD",
- "LAI",
- "Location",
- "Location Affordability",
- "Society",
- "US Department of Housing and Urban Development",
- "US Department of Transportation",
- "hud.official.content"
- ],
- "last_harvested_date": "2026-09-30T15:13:20.785730",
+ "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=d6c7b19ee3d54f42b53fad7d8233a3e0&sublayer=1",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Activities",
+ "Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration",
+ "Ecosystem Resoration",
+ "Forest Management",
+ "Open Data",
+ "Priority Forest Landscapes",
+ "US Forest Service",
+ "Vegetation Mangement",
+ "environment"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-09-30T21:33:01.783101",
  "organization": {
  "aliases": [
  "dept"
@@ -496,265 +310,191 @@
  "code_repo_exempt": false,
  "code_repo_url": null,
  "description": null,
- "id": "7f8ee588-32a3-4b6c-b435-d6603c91dbcc",
- "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/hud.png",
- "name": "Department of Housing and Urban Development",
+ "id": "352b4532-793d-4075-a03f-05b778a3c43a",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/usda.png",
+ "name": "Department of Agriculture",
  "organization_type": "Federal Government",
- "slug": "hud"
+ "slug": "usda"
  },
  "parent_identifier": null,
- "popularity": 15,
- "publisher": "Office of Policy Development and Research, GIS Helpdesk and Open Data Division",
- "slug": "location-affordability-index-v-3",
+ "popularity": 1,
+ "publisher": "U.S. Forest Service",
+ "slug": "integrated-resource-restoration-irr-point-feature-layer",
  "spatial_centroid": {
- "lat": 44.6359045,
- "lon": 0.2114917000000048
+ "lat": 42.08346,
+ "lon": -115.73904
  },
  "spatial_shape": {
  "coordinates": [
  [
  [
- [
- -179.147339,
- 71.390482
- ],
- [
- -180.0,
- 71.390482
- ],
- [
- -180.0,
- 17.881327
- ],
- [
- -179.147339,
- 17.881327
- ],
- [
- -179.147339,
- 71.390482
+ -119.6122,
+ 37.4935
+ ],
+ [
+ -119.6122,
+ 48.9684
+ ],
+ [
+ -109.9293,
+ 48.9684
+ ],
+ [
+ -109.9293,
+ 37.4935
+ ],
+ [
+ -119.6122,
+ 37.4935
  ]
  ]
  ],
- [
- [
- [
- 180.0,
- 17.881327
- ],
- [
- 180.0,
- 71.390482
- ],
- [
- 179.778467,
- 71.390482
- ],
- [
- 179.778467,
- 17.881327
- ],
- [
- 180.0,
- 17.881327
- ]
- ]
- ]
- ],
- "type": "MultiPolygon"
- },
- "theme": [],
- "title": "Location Affordability Index v.3",
+ "type": "Polygon"
+ },
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Integrated Resource Restoration (IRR): Point (Feature Layer)",
  "type": "dataset"
  },
  {
- "_score": 21.541409,
+ "_score": 9.124859,
  "_sort": [
- 1790781195448,
- 21.541409,
- 0,
- "d7f84d3e-d0c4-4a6b-9969-8e038fe8eba6"
+ 1790803981218,
+ 9.124859,
+ 3,
+ "448e0009-b494-485f-8a49-0df41e7f3821"
  ],
  "dcat": {
- "@type": "Dataset",
- "accessRights": "Public",
+ "@type": "dcat:Dataset",
+ "accessLevel": "public",
  "bureauCode": [
- "025:00"
+ "005:96"
  ],
  "contactPoint": {
- "@type": "vcard:Kind",
- "fn": "HUD GIS Helpdesk",
- "hasEmail": "mailto:GIShelpdesk@hud.gov"
- },
- "describedBy": {
- "@id": "https://www.arcgis.com/sharing/rest/content/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/info/metadata/metadata.xml?format=default",
- "@type": "foaf:Document",
- "mediaType": "XML document",
- "title": "Source metadata"
- },
- "description": "This dataset was developed by the Office of Environment and Energy (OEE). It provides tribal contact information to assist users with initiating Section 106 consultation under the National Historic Preservation Act (54 U.S.C. § 300101 et seq.). These data were developed by the Office of Environment and Energy (OEE) to help users identify tribes that may have an interest in the location of federally funded projects and provides tribal contact information to assist users with initiating Section 106 consultation under the National Historic Preservation Act (54 U.S.C. § 300101 et seq.). For questions about the spatial attribution of this dataset, please reach out to us at GISHelpdesk@hud.gov.",
+ "@type": "vcard:Contact",
+ "fn": "USFSEnterpriseContent",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:SM.FS.data@usda.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "This layer portrays the area where activities accomplished as a part of the silviculture program of work, funded through the budget allocation process and reported through the Forest Service Activity Tracking System (FACTS) database and are part of the Performance Measures used to rate Agency performance in meeting the Department's Strategic Goals. It is important to note that this layer may not contain all accomplished activities; the spatial portion of the activity description is not currently enforced by FACTS and at this time some are optionally reported by Forest Service units. This layer only represents those activities associated with the performance measure Forest Vegetation Improved (Release, Weeding, and Cleaning, Precommercial Thinning, Pruning and Fertilization). As spatial data reporting is enforced by the application and acceptance of reporting increases for both tabular and spatial we hope to improve the quality and comprehensiveness of the data used for this layer in coming years.�<a href='https://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/edw/edw_resources/meta/S_USA.Activity_SilvTSI.xml' target='_blank' rel='nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer'>Metadata</a>",
  "distribution": [
  {
- "@type": "dcat:DataService",
- "accessURL": "https://services.arcgis.com/VTyQ9soqVukalItT/arcgis/rest/services/TDAT_AGOL/FeatureServer/1",
- "downloadURL": "https://services.arcgis.com/VTyQ9soqVukalItT/arcgis/rest/services/TDAT_AGOL/FeatureServer/1",
- "format": "GeoServices REST",
- "mediaType": "GeoServices REST",
- "title": "ArcGIS REST service"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/csv?layers=1",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/csv?layers=1",
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://apps.fs.usda.gov/arcx/rest/services/EDW/EDW_SilvicultureTimberstandImprovement_01/MapServer/8",
+ "format": "ArcGIS GeoServices REST API",
+ "mediaType": "application/json",
+ "title": "ArcGIS GeoService"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/5a80aafd5e874c908436bff483ede8f5/csv?layers=8",
  "format": "CSV",
- "mediaType": "ftype/CSV",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
  "title": "CSV"
  },
  {
  "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/excel?layers=1",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/excel?layers=1",
- "format": "Excel",
- "mediaType": "ftype/XLSX",
- "title": "XLSX"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/featureCollection?layers=1",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/featureCollection?layers=1",
- "format": "Feature Collection",
- "mediaType": "ftype/TXT",
- "title": "TXT"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/filegdb?layers=1",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/filegdb?layers=1",
- "format": "File Geodatabase",
- "mediaType": "ftype/ZIP",
- "title": "ZIP"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/geoPackage?layers=1",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/geoPackage?layers=1",
- "format": "GeoPackage",
- "mediaType": "ftype/GPKG",
- "title": "GPKG"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/geojson?layers=1",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/geojson?layers=1",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/5a80aafd5e874c908436bff483ede8f5/geojson?layers=8",
  "format": "GeoJSON",
- "mediaType": "ftype/GEOJSON",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.geo+json",
  "title": "GeoJSON"
  },
  {
  "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/kml?layers=1",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/kml?layers=1",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/5a80aafd5e874c908436bff483ede8f5/kml?layers=8",
  "format": "KML",
- "mediaType": "ftype/KML",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.google-earth.kml+xml",
  "title": "KML"
  },
  {
  "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/shapefile?layers=1",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/shapefile?layers=1",
- "format": "Shapefile",
- "mediaType": "ftype/ZIP",
- "title": "ZIP"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/sqlite?layers=1",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/sqlite?layers=1",
- "format": "SQLite Geodatabase",
- "mediaType": "ftype/GDB",
- "title": "GDB"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/HUD::tribe-contact-county-vw",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/HUD::tribe-contact-county-vw",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/5a80aafd5e874c908436bff483ede8f5/shapefile?layers=8",
+ "format": "ZIP",
+ "mediaType": "application/zip",
+ "title": "Shapefile"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/usfs::silviculture-timber-stand-improvement-feature-layer",
  "format": "Web Page",
- "mediaType": "ftype/HTML",
+ "mediaType": "text/html",
  "title": "ArcGIS Hub Dataset"
  },
  {
  "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0&sublayer=1",
- "downloadURL": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0&sublayer=1",
- "format": "A data layer is used to access and display data in a map or scene. Layers support ready-to-use properties and settings of data services.",
- "mediaType": "ftype/HTML",
- "title": "ArcGIS Data Layer"
+ "accessURL": "https://www.arcgis.com/sharing/rest/content/items/5a80aafd5e874c908436bff483ede8f5/info/metadata/metadata.xml?format=iso19139",
+ "conformsTo": "https://www.isotc211.org/2005/gmi",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "ISO-19139 metadata"
  }
  ],
- "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0&sublayer=1",
- "issued": "2019-03-06T21:20:44.000Z",
- "keyword": [
- "boundaries",
- "census",
- "county",
- "county equivalent",
- "polygon",
- "society"
- ],
- "landingPage": {
- "@id": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/HUD::tribe-contact-county-vw",
- "@type": "Document",
- "title": "TRIBE CONTACT COUNTY VW landing page"
- },
- "modified": "2022-01-28T15:03:49.237Z",
+ "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=5a80aafd5e874c908436bff483ede8f5&sublayer=8",
+ "issued": "2017-05-04",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Activities",
+ "Forest Management",
+ "Improvement",
+ "Open Data",
+ "Recovery",
+ "Resiliency",
+ "Safety",
+ "Silviculture Timberstand",
+ "ecosystem restoration",
+ "environment",
+ "silviculture",
+ "timber stand improvement",
+ "u.s. forest service",
+ "vegetation management"
+ ],
+ "landingPage": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/usfs::silviculture-timber-stand-improvement-feature-layer",
+ "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
+ "modified": "2022-08-25",
  "programCode": [
- "025:000"
- ],
+ "005:059"
+ ],
+ "progressCode": "onGoing",
  "publisher": {
- "@type": "org:Organization",
- "name": "Office of Policy Development and Research, GIS Helpdesk and Open Data Division",
- "subOrganizationOf": [
- {
- "@type": "org:Organization",
- "name": "Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research"
- }
- ]
- },
- "rights": [
- "HUD and the dataset and metadata authors assume no responsibility for the use or misuse of the dataset. No warranty, expressed or implied is made with regard to the accuracy of the spatial accuracy, and no liability is assumed by the U.S. Government in general, the dataset creators or the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development specifically, as to the spatial or attribute accuracy of the data."
- ],
- "spatial": "{\"@type\": \"Location\", \"bbox\": {\"coordinates\": [[[-178.227822, 71.390482], [-65.24426, 71.390482], [-65.24426, 17.881325], [-178.227822, 17.881325], [-178.227822, 71.390482]]], \"type\": \"Polygon\"}, \"prefLabel\": \"United States and Minor Outlying Islands\"}",
- "title": "TRIBE CONTACT COUNTY VW"
- },
- "description": "This dataset was developed by the Office of Environment and Energy (OEE). It provides tribal contact information to assist users with initiating Section 106 consultation under the National Historic Preservation Act (54 U.S.C. § 300101 et seq.). These data were developed by the Office of Environment and Energy (OEE) to help users identify tribes that may have an interest in the location of federally funded projects and provides tribal contact information to assist users with initiating Section 106 consultation under the National Historic Preservation Act (54 U.S.C. § 300101 et seq.). For questions about the spatial attribution of this dataset, please reach out to us at GISHelpdesk@hud.gov.",
+ "name": "U.S. Forest Service",
+ "source": "U.S. Forest Service"
+ },
+ "spatial": "-150.8989,18.3401,-65.7612,60.9270",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Silviculture Timber Stand Improvement (Feature Layer)"
+ },
+ "description": "This layer portrays the area where activities accomplished as a part of the silviculture program of work, funded through the budget allocation process and reported through the Forest Service Activity Tracking System (FACTS) database and are part of the Performance Measures used to rate Agency performance in meeting the Department's Strategic Goals. It is important to note that this layer may not contain all accomplished activities; the spatial portion of the activity description is not currently enforced by FACTS and at this time some are optionally reported by Forest Service units. This layer only represents those activities associated with the performance measure Forest Vegetation Improved (Release, Weeding, and Cleaning, Precommercial Thinning, Pruning and Fertilization). As spatial data reporting is enforced by the application and acceptance of reporting increases for both tabular and spatial we hope to improve the quality and comprehensiveness of the data used for this layer in coming years.�<a href='https://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/edw/edw_resources/meta/S_USA.Activity_SilvTSI.xml' target='_blank' rel='nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer'>Metadata</a>",
  "distribution_titles": [
- "ArcGIS REST service",
+ "ArcGIS GeoService",
  "CSV",
- "XLSX",
- "TXT",
- "ZIP",
- "GPKG",
  "GeoJSON",
  "KML",
- "ZIP",
- "GDB",
+ "Shapefile",
  "ArcGIS Hub Dataset",
- "ArcGIS Data Layer"
- ],
- "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/81415444-b36a-4ccf-bd9f-875e2b4b4a52",
- "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/81415444-b36a-4ccf-bd9f-875e2b4b4a52/raw",
- "has_download": true,
+ "ISO-19139 metadata"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/1779897b-5760-44d2-8471-46d53ed44e7a",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/1779897b-5760-44d2-8471-46d53ed44e7a/raw",
+ "has_download": false,
  "has_spatial": true,
- "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0&sublayer=1",
- "keyword": [
- "boundaries",
- "census",
- "county",
- "county equivalent",
- "polygon",
- "society"
- ],
- "last_harvested_date": "2026-09-30T15:13:15.448599",
+ "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=5a80aafd5e874c908436bff483ede8f5&sublayer=8",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Activities",
+ "Forest Management",
+ "Improvement",
+ "Open Data",
+ "Recovery",
+ "Resiliency",
+ "Safety",
+ "Silviculture Timberstand",
+ "ecosystem restoration",
+ "environment",
+ "silviculture",
+ "timber stand improvement",
+ "u.s. forest service",
+ "vegetation management"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-09-30T21:33:01.218213",
  "organization": {
  "aliases": [
  "dept"
@@ -762,239 +502,177 @@
  "code_repo_exempt": false,
  "code_repo_url": null,
  "description": null,
- "id": "7f8ee588-32a3-4b6c-b435-d6603c91dbcc",
- "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/hud.png",
- "name": "Department of Housing and Urban Development",
+ "id": "352b4532-793d-4075-a03f-05b778a3c43a",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/usda.png",
+ "name": "Department of Agriculture",
  "organization_type": "Federal Government",
- "slug": "hud"
+ "slug": "usda"
  },
  "parent_identifier": null,
- "popularity": 0,
- "publisher": "Office of Policy Development and Research, GIS Helpdesk and Open Data Division",
- "slug": "tribe-contact-county-vw",
+ "popularity": 3,
+ "publisher": "U.S. Forest Service",
+ "slug": "silviculture-timber-stand-improvement-feature-layer",
  "spatial_centroid": {
- "lat": 49.9868192,
- "lon": -133.0343972
+ "lat": 35.37486,
+ "lon": -116.84382000000001
  },
  "spatial_shape": {
  "coordinates": [
  [
  [
- -178.227822,
- 71.390482
- ],
- [
- -178.227822,
- 17.881325
- ],
- [
- -65.24426,
- 17.881325
- ],
- [
- -65.24426,
- 71.390482
- ],
- [
- -178.227822,
- 71.390482
+ -150.8989,
+ 18.3401
+ ],
+ [
+ -150.8989,
+ 60.927
+ ],
+ [
+ -65.7612,
+ 60.927
+ ],
+ [
+ -65.7612,
+ 18.3401
+ ],
+ [
+ -150.8989,
+ 18.3401
  ]
  ]
  ],
  "type": "Polygon"
  },
- "theme": [],
- "title": "TRIBE CONTACT COUNTY VW",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Silviculture Timber Stand Improvement (Feature Layer)",
  "type": "dataset"
  },
  {
- "_score": 21.667225,
+ "_score": 10.470049,
  "_sort": [
- 1790781195216,
- 21.667225,
- 0,
- "a5c0a51b-1bf7-4cf4-b6fa-c50a5f16cea4"
+ 1790803979936,
+ 10.470049,
+ 6,
+ "0a6f40bf-fc05-470c-8926-5a52b39a6afb"
  ],
  "dcat": {
- "@type": "Dataset",
- "accessRights": "Public",
+ "@type": "dcat:Dataset",
+ "accessLevel": "public",
  "bureauCode": [
- "025:00"
+ "005:96"
  ],
  "contactPoint": {
- "@type": "vcard:Kind",
- "fn": "HUD GIS Helpdesk",
- "hasEmail": "mailto:GIShelpdesk@hud.gov"
- },
- "describedBy": {
- "@id": "https://www.arcgis.com/sharing/rest/content/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/info/metadata/metadata.xml?format=default",
- "@type": "foaf:Document",
- "mediaType": "XML document",
- "title": "Source metadata"
- },
- "description": "This dataset was developed by the Office of Environment and Energy (OEE). It provides tribal contact information to assist users with initiating Section 106 consultation under the National Historic Preservation Act (54 U.S.C. § 300101 et seq.). These data were developed by the Office of Environment and Energy (OEE) to help users identify tribes that may have an interest in the location of federally funded projects and provides tribal contact information to assist users with initiating Section 106 consultation under the National Historic Preservation Act (54 U.S.C. § 300101 et seq.). For questions about the spatial attribution of this dataset, please reach out to us at GISHelpdesk@hud.gov.",
+ "@type": "vcard:Contact",
+ "fn": "USFSEnterpriseContent",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:SM.FS.data@usda.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "The Silviculture Reforestation feature class represents activities associated with the following performance measure: Forest Vegetation Establishment (Planting, Seeding, Site Preparation for Natural Regeneration and Certification of Natural Regeneration without Site Preparation). The Activities data set portrays the areas where activities are accomplished as a part of the silviculture program of work, funded through the budget allocation process and reported through the Forest Service Activity Tracking System (FACTS) database within the Natural Resource Manager (NRM) suite of applications. The activities are part of the Performance Measures used to rate Agency performance in meeting the Department's Strategic Goals. It is important to note that this layer may not contain all accomplished activities; the spatial portion of the activity description is not currently enforced by FACTS and at this time some are optionally reported by Forest Service units. As spatial data reporting is enforced by the application and acceptance of reporting increases for both tabular and spatial we hope to improve the quality and comprehensiveness of the data used for this layer in coming years. <a href='https://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/edw/datasets.php?xmlKeyword=silviculture+reforestation+needs' target='_blank' rel='nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer'>Metadata and Downloads</a>.",
  "distribution": [
  {
- "@type": "dcat:DataService",
- "accessURL": "https://services.arcgis.com/VTyQ9soqVukalItT/arcgis/rest/services/TDAT_AGOL/FeatureServer/0",
- "downloadURL": "https://services.arcgis.com/VTyQ9soqVukalItT/arcgis/rest/services/TDAT_AGOL/FeatureServer/0",
- "format": "GeoServices REST",
- "mediaType": "GeoServices REST",
- "title": "ArcGIS REST service"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/csv?layers=0",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/csv?layers=0",
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://apps.fs.usda.gov/arcx/rest/services/EDW/EDW_SilvicultureReforestationNeeds_01/MapServer/1",
+ "format": "ArcGIS GeoServices REST API",
+ "mediaType": "application/json",
+ "title": "ArcGIS GeoService"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/8e83d9c39f494753b77cef41ad91262c/csv?layers=1",
  "format": "CSV",
- "mediaType": "ftype/CSV",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
  "title": "CSV"
  },
  {
  "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/excel?layers=0",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/excel?layers=0",
- "format": "Excel",
- "mediaType": "ftype/XLSX",
- "title": "XLSX"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/featureCollection?layers=0",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/featureCollection?layers=0",
- "format": "Feature Collection",
- "mediaType": "ftype/TXT",
- "title": "TXT"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/filegdb?layers=0",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/filegdb?layers=0",
- "format": "File Geodatabase",
- "mediaType": "ftype/ZIP",
- "title": "ZIP"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/geoPackage?layers=0",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/geoPackage?layers=0",
- "format": "GeoPackage",
- "mediaType": "ftype/GPKG",
- "title": "GPKG"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/geojson?layers=0",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/geojson?layers=0",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/8e83d9c39f494753b77cef41ad91262c/geojson?layers=1",
  "format": "GeoJSON",
- "mediaType": "ftype/GEOJSON",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.geo+json",
  "title": "GeoJSON"
  },
  {
  "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/kml?layers=0",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/kml?layers=0",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/8e83d9c39f494753b77cef41ad91262c/kml?layers=1",
  "format": "KML",
- "mediaType": "ftype/KML",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.google-earth.kml+xml",
  "title": "KML"
  },
  {
  "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/shapefile?layers=0",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/shapefile?layers=0",
- "format": "Shapefile",
- "mediaType": "ftype/ZIP",
- "title": "ZIP"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/sqlite?layers=0",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/sqlite?layers=0",
- "format": "SQLite Geodatabase",
- "mediaType": "ftype/GDB",
- "title": "GDB"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/HUD::county",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/HUD::county",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/8e83d9c39f494753b77cef41ad91262c/shapefile?layers=1",
+ "format": "ZIP",
+ "mediaType": "application/zip",
+ "title": "Shapefile"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/usfs::silviculture-reforestation-needs-feature-layer",
  "format": "Web Page",
- "mediaType": "ftype/HTML",
+ "mediaType": "text/html",
  "title": "ArcGIS Hub Dataset"
  },
  {
  "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0&sublayer=0",
- "downloadURL": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0&sublayer=0",
- "format": "A data layer is used to access and display data in a map or scene. Layers support ready-to-use properties and settings of data services.",
- "mediaType": "ftype/HTML",
- "title": "ArcGIS Data Layer"
+ "accessURL": "https://www.arcgis.com/sharing/rest/content/items/8e83d9c39f494753b77cef41ad91262c/info/metadata/metadata.xml?format=iso19139",
+ "conformsTo": "https://www.isotc211.org/2005/gmi",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "ISO-19139 metadata"
  }
  ],
- "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0&sublayer=0",
- "issued": "2019-03-06T21:20:44.000Z",
- "keyword": [
- "boundaries",
- "census",
- "county",
- "county equivalent",
- "polygon",
- "society"
- ],
- "landingPage": {
- "@id": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/HUD::county",
- "@type": "Document",
- "title": "COUNTY landing page"
- },
- "modified": "2022-01-28T15:03:49.237Z",
+ "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=8e83d9c39f494753b77cef41ad91262c&sublayer=1",
+ "issued": "2020-09-14",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Activities",
+ "Open Data",
+ "Recovery",
+ "Resiliency",
+ "Safety",
+ "Silviculture Reforestation Needs",
+ "environment"
+ ],
+ "landingPage": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/usfs::silviculture-reforestation-needs-feature-layer",
+ "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
+ "modified": "2022-08-29",
  "programCode": [
- "025:000"
- ],
+ "005:059"
+ ],
+ "progressCode": "onGoing",
  "publisher": {
- "@type": "org:Organization",
- "name": "Office of Policy Development and Research, GIS Helpdesk and Open Data Division",
- "subOrganizationOf": [
- {
- "@type": "org:Organization",
- "name": "Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research"
- }
- ]
- },
- "rights": [
- "HUD and the dataset and metadata authors assume no responsibility for the use or misuse of the dataset. No warranty, expressed or implied is made with regard to the accuracy of the spatial accuracy, and no liability is assumed by the U.S. Government in general, the dataset creators or the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development specifically, as to the spatial or attribute accuracy of the data."
- ],
- "spatial": "{\"@type\": \"Location\", \"bbox\": {\"coordinates\": [[[-178.227822, 71.390482], [-65.24426, 71.390482], [-65.24426, 17.881325], [-178.227822, 17.881325], [-178.227822, 71.390482]]], \"type\": \"Polygon\"}, \"prefLabel\": \"United States and Minor Outlying Islands\"}",
- "title": "COUNTY"
- },
- "description": "This dataset was developed by the Office of Environment and Energy (OEE). It provides tribal contact information to assist users with initiating Section 106 consultation under the National Historic Preservation Act (54 U.S.C. § 300101 et seq.). These data were developed by the Office of Environment and Energy (OEE) to help users identify tribes that may have an interest in the location of federally funded projects and provides tribal contact information to assist users with initiating Section 106 consultation under the National Historic Preservation Act (54 U.S.C. § 300101 et seq.). For questions about the spatial attribution of this dataset, please reach out to us at GISHelpdesk@hud.gov.",
+ "name": "U.S. Forest Service",
+ "source": "U.S. Forest Service"
+ },
+ "spatial": "-149.6887,18.3043,-65.7607,60.9222",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Silviculture Reforestation Needs (Feature Layer)"
+ },
+ "description": "The Silviculture Reforestation feature class represents activities associated with the following performance measure: Forest Vegetation Establishment (Planting, Seeding, Site Preparation for Natural Regeneration and Certification of Natural Regeneration without Site Preparation). The Activities data set portrays the areas where activities are accomplished as a part of the silviculture program of work, funded through the budget allocation process and reported through the Forest Service Activity Tracking System (FACTS) database within the Natural Resource Manager (NRM) suite of applications. The activities are part of the Performance Measures used to rate Agency performance in meeting the Department's Strategic Goals. It is important to note that this layer may not contain all accomplished activities; the spatial portion of the activity description is not currently enforced by FACTS and at this time some are optionally reported by Forest Service units. As spatial data reporting is enforced by the application and acceptance of reporting increases for both tabular and spatial we hope to improve the quality and comprehensiveness of the data used for this layer in coming years. <a href='https://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/edw/datasets.php?xmlKeyword=silviculture+reforestation+needs' target='_blank' rel='nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer'>Metadata and Downloads</a>.",
  "distribution_titles": [
- "ArcGIS REST service",
+ "ArcGIS GeoService",
  "CSV",
- "XLSX",
- "TXT",
- "ZIP",
- "GPKG",
  "GeoJSON",
  "KML",
- "ZIP",
- "GDB",
+ "Shapefile",
  "ArcGIS Hub Dataset",
- "ArcGIS Data Layer"
- ],
- "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/67c20f02-2d4e-4f92-8750-c9349fab8a0c",
- "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/67c20f02-2d4e-4f92-8750-c9349fab8a0c/raw",
- "has_download": true,
+ "ISO-19139 metadata"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/79b608c8-4e45-4b22-8891-b2a0698db869",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/79b608c8-4e45-4b22-8891-b2a0698db869/raw",
+ "has_download": false,
  "has_spatial": true,
- "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0&sublayer=0",
- "keyword": [
- "boundaries",
- "census",
- "county",
- "county equivalent",
- "polygon",
- "society"
- ],
- "last_harvested_date": "2026-09-30T15:13:15.216491",
+ "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=8e83d9c39f494753b77cef41ad91262c&sublayer=1",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Activities",
+ "Open Data",
+ "Recovery",
+ "Resiliency",
+ "Safety",
+ "Silviculture Reforestation Needs",
+ "environment"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-09-30T21:32:59.936454",
  "organization": {
  "aliases": [
  "dept"
@@ -1002,158 +680,179 @@
  "code_repo_exempt": false,
  "code_repo_url": null,
  "description": null,
- "id": "7f8ee588-32a3-4b6c-b435-d6603c91dbcc",
- "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/hud.png",
- "name": "Department of Housing and Urban Development",
+ "id": "352b4532-793d-4075-a03f-05b778a3c43a",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/usda.png",
+ "name": "Department of Agriculture",
  "organization_type": "Federal Government",
- "slug": "hud"
+ "slug": "usda"
  },
  "parent_identifier": null,
- "popularity": 0,
- "publisher": "Office of Policy Development and Research, GIS Helpdesk and Open Data Division",
- "slug": "county",
+ "popularity": 6,
+ "publisher": "U.S. Forest Service",
+ "slug": "silviculture-reforestation-needs-feature-layer",
  "spatial_centroid": {
- "lat": 49.9868192,
- "lon": -133.0343972
+ "lat": 35.351459999999996,
+ "lon": -116.11750000000002
  },
  "spatial_shape": {
  "coordinates": [
  [
  [
- -178.227822,
- 71.390482
- ],
- [
- -178.227822,
- 17.881325
- ],
- [
- -65.24426,
- 17.881325
- ],
- [
- -65.24426,
- 71.390482
- ],
- [
- -178.227822,
- 71.390482
+ -149.6887,
+ 18.3043
+ ],
+ [
+ -149.6887,
+ 60.9222
+ ],
+ [
+ -65.7607,
+ 60.9222
+ ],
+ [
+ -65.7607,
+ 18.3043
+ ],
+ [
+ -149.6887,
+ 18.3043
  ]
  ]
  ],
  "type": "Polygon"
  },
- "theme": [],
- "title": "COUNTY",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Silviculture Reforestation Needs (Feature Layer)",
  "type": "dataset"
  },
  {
- "_score": 21.541409,
+ "_score": 10.363989,
  "_sort": [
- 1790781194982,
- 21.541409,
- 6,
- "77c5ae96-5748-40c0-9ec2-f07b88085854"
+ 1790803979735,
+ 10.363989,
+ 3,
+ "33639b80-3364-4f89-bf75-86daa910bad7"
  ],
  "dcat": {
- "@type": "Dataset",
- "accessRights": "Public",
+ "@type": "dcat:Dataset",
+ "accessLevel": "public",
  "bureauCode": [
- "025:00"
+ "005:96"
  ],
  "contactPoint": {
- "@type": "vcard:Kind",
- "fn": "HUD GIS Helpdesk",
- "hasEmail": "mailto:GIShelpdesk@hud.gov"
- },
- "describedBy": {
- "@id": "https://www.arcgis.com/sharing/rest/content/items/77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0/info/metadata/metadata.xml?format=default",
- "@type": "foaf:Document",
- "mediaType": "XML document",
- "title": "Source metadata"
- },
- "description": "This dataset was developed by the Office of Environment and Energy (OEE). It provides tribal contact information to assist users with initiating Section 106 consultation under the National Historic Preservation Act (54 U.S.C. § 300101 et seq.). These data were developed by the Office of Environment and Energy (OEE) to help users identify tribes that may have an interest in the location of federally funded projects and provides tribal contact information to assist users with initiating Section 106 consultation under the National Historic Preservation Act (54 U.S.C. § 300101 et seq.). For questions about the spatial attribution of this dataset, please reach out to us at GISHelpdesk@hud.gov.",
+ "@type": "vcard:Contact",
+ "fn": "USFSEnterpriseContent",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:SM.FS.data@usda.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "The SilvTSI (Silviculture Timber Stand Improvement) feature class represents activities associated with the following performance measure: Forest Vegetation Improved (Release, Weeding, and Cleaning, Precommercial Thinning, Pruning and Fertilization). The Activities data set portrays the areas where activities are accomplished as a part of the silviculture program of work, funded through the budget allocation process and reported through the Forest Service Activity Tracking System (FACTS) database within the Natural Resource Manager (NRM) suite of applications. The activities are part of the Performance Measures used to rate Agency performance in meeting the Department's Strategic Goals. It is important to note that this layer may not contain all accomplished activities; the spatial portion of the activity description is not currently enforced by FACTS and at this time some are optionally reported by Forest Service units. As spatial data reporting is enforced by the application and acceptance of reporting increases for both tabular and spatial we hope to improve the quality and comprehensiveness of the data used for this layer in coming years. <a href='https://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/edw/datasets.php?xmlKeyword=silviculture+timber+stand+improvement+needs' target='_blank' rel='nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer'>Metadata and Downloads</a>.",
  "distribution": [
  {
- "@type": "dcat:DataService",
- "accessURL": "https://services.arcgis.com/VTyQ9soqVukalItT/arcgis/rest/services/TDAT_AGOL/FeatureServer",
- "downloadURL": "https://services.arcgis.com/VTyQ9soqVukalItT/arcgis/rest/services/TDAT_AGOL/FeatureServer",
- "format": "GeoServices REST",
- "mediaType": "GeoServices REST",
- "title": "ArcGIS REST service"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/maps/HUD::tribal-contact-data",
- "downloadURL": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/maps/HUD::tribal-contact-data",
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://apps.fs.usda.gov/arcx/rest/services/EDW/EDW_SilvicultureTimberstandImprovementNeeds_01/MapServer/0",
+ "format": "ArcGIS GeoServices REST API",
+ "mediaType": "application/json",
+ "title": "ArcGIS GeoService"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/340adadb629c4f89ae9c8162428cf057/csv?layers=0",
+ "format": "CSV",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "CSV"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/340adadb629c4f89ae9c8162428cf057/geojson?layers=0",
+ "format": "GeoJSON",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.geo+json",
+ "title": "GeoJSON"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/340adadb629c4f89ae9c8162428cf057/kml?layers=0",
+ "format": "KML",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.google-earth.kml+xml",
+ "title": "KML"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/340adadb629c4f89ae9c8162428cf057/shapefile?layers=0",
+ "format": "ZIP",
+ "mediaType": "application/zip",
+ "title": "Shapefile"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/usfs::silviculture-timber-stand-improvement-needs-feature-layer",
  "format": "Web Page",
- "mediaType": "ftype/HTML",
+ "mediaType": "text/html",
  "title": "ArcGIS Hub Dataset"
  },
  {
  "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0",
- "downloadURL": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0",
- "format": "A data layer is used to access and display data in a map or scene. Layers support ready-to-use properties and settings of data services.",
- "mediaType": "ftype/HTML",
- "title": "ArcGIS Data Layer"
+ "accessURL": "https://www.arcgis.com/sharing/rest/content/items/340adadb629c4f89ae9c8162428cf057/info/metadata/metadata.xml?format=iso19139",
+ "conformsTo": "https://www.isotc211.org/2005/gmi",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "ISO-19139 metadata"
  }
  ],
- "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0",
- "issued": "2019-03-06T21:20:44.000Z",
- "keyword": [
- "boundaries",
- "census",
- "county",
- "county equivalent",
- "polygon",
- "society"
- ],
- "landingPage": {
- "@id": "https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/maps/HUD::tribal-contact-data",
- "@type": "Document",
- "title": "Tribal Contact Data landing page"
- },
- "modified": "2025-07-29T18:26:18.000Z",
+ "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=340adadb629c4f89ae9c8162428cf057&sublayer=0",
+ "issued": "2020-09-14",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Activities",
+ "Improvement",
+ "Open Data",
+ "Recovery",
+ "Resiliency",
+ "Safety",
+ "Silviculture Timberstand Needs",
+ "environment"
+ ],
+ "landingPage": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/usfs::silviculture-timber-stand-improvement-needs-feature-layer",
+ "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
+ "modified": "2022-08-29",
  "programCode": [
- "025:000"
- ],
+ "005:059"
+ ],
+ "progressCode": "onGoing",
  "publisher": {
- "@type": "org:Organization",
- "name": "Office of Policy Development and Research, GIS Helpdesk and Open Data Division",
- "subOrganizationOf": [
- {
- "@type": "org:Organization",
- "name": "Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research"
- }
- ]
- },
- "rights": [
- "HUD and the dataset and metadata authors assume no responsibility for the use or misuse of the dataset. No warranty, expressed or implied is made with regard to the accuracy of the spatial accuracy, and no liability is assumed by the U.S. Government in general, the dataset creators or the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development specifically, as to the spatial or attribute accuracy of the data."
- ],
- "spatial": "{\"@type\": \"Location\", \"bbox\": {\"coordinates\": [[[-178.227822, 71.390482], [-65.24426, 71.390482], [-65.24426, 17.881325], [-178.227822, 17.881325], [-178.227822, 71.390482]]], \"type\": \"Polygon\"}, \"prefLabel\": \"United States and Minor Outlying Islands\"}",
- "title": "Tribal Contact Data"
- },
- "description": "This dataset was developed by the Office of Environment and Energy (OEE). It provides tribal contact information to assist users with initiating Section 106 consultation under the National Historic Preservation Act (54 U.S.C. § 300101 et seq.). These data were developed by the Office of Environment and Energy (OEE) to help users identify tribes that may have an interest in the location of federally funded projects and provides tribal contact information to assist users with initiating Section 106 consultation under the National Historic Preservation Act (54 U.S.C. § 300101 et seq.). For questions about the spatial attribution of this dataset, please reach out to us at GISHelpdesk@hud.gov.",
+ "name": "U.S. Forest Service",
+ "source": "U.S. Forest Service"
+ },
+ "spatial": "-149.6887,18.3043,-65.7607,60.9222",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Silviculture Timber Stand Improvement Needs (Feature Layer)"
+ },
+ "description": "The SilvTSI (Silviculture Timber Stand Improvement) feature class represents activities associated with the following performance measure: Forest Vegetation Improved (Release, Weeding, and Cleaning, Precommercial Thinning, Pruning and Fertilization). The Activities data set portrays the areas where activities are accomplished as a part of the silviculture program of work, funded through the budget allocation process and reported through the Forest Service Activity Tracking System (FACTS) database within the Natural Resource Manager (NRM) suite of applications. The activities are part of the Performance Measures used to rate Agency performance in meeting the Department's Strategic Goals. It is important to note that this layer may not contain all accomplished activities; the spatial portion of the activity description is not currently enforced by FACTS and at this time some are optionally reported by Forest Service units. As spatial data reporting is enforced by the application and acceptance of reporting increases for both tabular and spatial we hope to improve the quality and comprehensiveness of the data used for this layer in coming years. <a href='https://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/edw/datasets.php?xmlKeyword=silviculture+timber+stand+improvement+needs' target='_blank' rel='nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer'>Metadata and Downloads</a>.",
  "distribution_titles": [
- "ArcGIS REST service",
+ "ArcGIS GeoService",
+ "CSV",
+ "GeoJSON",
+ "KML",
+ "Shapefile",
  "ArcGIS Hub Dataset",
- "ArcGIS Data Layer"
- ],
- "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/b99957f3-31a5-4ed2-a814-2f29fd95a8eb",
- "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/b99957f3-31a5-4ed2-a814-2f29fd95a8eb/raw",
- "has_download": true,
+ "ISO-19139 metadata"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/b9d4bff3-1632-45e5-a8e2-95dbf24b6aa8",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/b9d4bff3-1632-45e5-a8e2-95dbf24b6aa8/raw",
+ "has_download": false,
  "has_spatial": true,
- "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=77572a4428384d2697c476564dcf53f0",
- "keyword": [
- "boundaries",
- "census",
- "county",
- "county equivalent",
- "polygon",
- "society"
- ],
- "last_harvested_date": "2026-09-30T15:13:14.982069",
+ "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=340adadb629c4f89ae9c8162428cf057&sublayer=0",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Activities",
+ "Improvement",
+ "Open Data",
+ "Recovery",
+ "Resiliency",
+ "Safety",
+ "Silviculture Timberstand Needs",
+ "environment"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-09-30T21:32:59.735539",
  "organization": {
  "aliases": [
  "dept"
@@ -1161,127 +860,197 @@
  "code_repo_exempt": false,
  "code_repo_url": null,
  "description": null,
- "id": "7f8ee588-32a3-4b6c-b435-d6603c91dbcc",
- "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/hud.png",
- "name": "Department of Housing and Urban Development",
+ "id": "352b4532-793d-4075-a03f-05b778a3c43a",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/usda.png",
+ "name": "Department of Agriculture",
  "organization_type": "Federal Government",
- "slug": "hud"
+ "slug": "usda"
  },
  "parent_identifier": null,
- "popularity": 6,
- "publisher": "Office of Policy Development and Research, GIS Helpdesk and Open Data Division",
- "slug": "tribal-contact-data",
+ "popularity": 3,
+ "publisher": "U.S. Forest Service",
+ "slug": "silviculture-timber-stand-improvement-needs-feature-layer",
  "spatial_centroid": {
- "lat": 49.9868192,
- "lon": -133.0343972
+ "lat": 35.351459999999996,
+ "lon": -116.11750000000002
  },
  "spatial_shape": {
  "coordinates": [
  [
  [
- -178.227822,
- 71.390482
- ],
- [
- -178.227822,
- 17.881325
- ],
- [
- -65.24426,
- 17.881325
- ],
- [
- -65.24426,
- 71.390482
- ],
- [
- -178.227822,
- 71.390482
+ -149.6887,
+ 18.3043
+ ],
+ [
+ -149.6887,
+ 60.9222
+ ],
+ [
+ -65.7607,
+ 60.9222
+ ],
+ [
+ -65.7607,
+ 18.3043
+ ],
+ [
+ -149.6887,
+ 18.3043
  ]
  ]
  ],
  "type": "Polygon"
  },
- "theme": [],
- "title": "Tribal Contact Data",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Silviculture Timber Stand Improvement Needs (Feature Layer)",
  "type": "dataset"
  },
  {
- "_score": 15.986647,
+ "_score": 10.157772,
  "_sort": [
- 1790781169101,
- 15.986647,
- 1,
- "c716c13e-bb19-4f44-a863-9f828d25ed9a"
+ 1790803974009,
+ 10.157772,
+ 2,
+ "b6074b84-7cc1-4bc3-af12-32e06ba11171"
  ],
  "dcat": {
- "@type": "Dataset",
+ "@type": "dcat:Dataset",
+ "accessLevel": "public",
  "bureauCode": [
- "025:06"
+ "005:96"
  ],
  "contactPoint": {
  "@type": "vcard:Contact",
- "fn": "CPD Systems Development and Evaluation Division",
- "hasEmail": "mailto:cpd_web_mail@hud.gov"
- },
- "description": "The datasets are the full-year allocations for HUD's Office of Community Planning and Development (CPD) formula programs: Community Development Block Grants (CDBG); HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME), including the American Dream Downpayment Initiative (ADDI); Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA); and Emergency Shelter Grants (ESG). HUD's CPD office seeks to develop viable communities by promoting integrated approaches that provide decent housing, a suitable living environment, and expand economic opportunities for low and moderate income persons. The primary means towards this end is the development of partnerships among all levels of government and the private sector, including for-profit and non-profit organizations. Datasets are available starting from FY2001.",
+ "fn": "USFSEnterpriseContent",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:SM.FS.data@usda.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "<div>The data in this map service is updated every weekend.</div><div></div><div><br /></div><div>Note: This data includes all activities regardless of whether there is a spatial feature attached.<br /><div><br /></div><div>Note: This is a large dataset. Metadata and Downloads are available at: https://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/edw/datasets.php?xmlKeyword=FACTS+common+attributes<br /></div><div><br /></div><div>To download FACTS activities layers, search for the activity types you want, such as timber harvest or hazardous fuels treatments. The Forest Service's Natural Resource Manager (NRM) Forest Activity Tracking System (FACTS) is the agency standard for managing information about activities related to fire/fuels, silviculture, and invasive species. This feature class contains the FACTS attributes most commonly needed to describe FACTS activities.</div></div>",
  "distribution": [
  {
  "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/comm_planning/budget",
- "title": "Formula Program Allocations by State"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "downloadURL": "https://inventory.data.gov/dataset/73d16d5b-af93-4dfd-8564-19b7d7af29b9/resource/f40d8637-b6b7-447d-ba00-22cd31b5757f/download/fy2020-cares-allocations-allgrantees.xlsx",
- "mediaType": "application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet",
- "title": "FY2020 CARES Act Grants"
+ "accessURL": "https://apps.fs.usda.gov/arcx/rest/services/EDW/EDW_ActivityFactsCommonAttributes_01/MapServer/0",
+ "format": "ArcGIS GeoServices REST API",
+ "mediaType": "application/json",
+ "title": "ArcGIS GeoService"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://apps.fs.usda.gov/arcx/rest/services/EDW/EDW_ActivityFactsCommonAttributes_01/MapServer/0"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/f8fb12b1bab44c11b1bee96562cc4773/csv?layers=0",
+ "format": "CSV",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "CSV"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/f8fb12b1bab44c11b1bee96562cc4773/geojson?layers=0",
+ "format": "GeoJSON",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.geo+json",
+ "title": "GeoJSON"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/f8fb12b1bab44c11b1bee96562cc4773/kml?layers=0",
+ "format": "KML",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.google-earth.kml+xml",
+ "title": "KML"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/f8fb12b1bab44c11b1bee96562cc4773/shapefile?layers=0",
+ "format": "ZIP",
+ "mediaType": "application/zip",
+ "title": "Shapefile"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/usfs::activity-facts-common-attributes-feature-layer",
+ "format": "Web Page",
+ "mediaType": "text/html",
+ "title": "ArcGIS Hub Dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/edw/edw_resources/fc/S_USA.Actv_CommonAttribute_PL.gdb.zip",
+ "description": "Geodatabase Download",
+ "title": "Geodatabase Download"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/edw/edw_resources/shp/S_USA.Actv_CommonAttribute_PL.zip",
+ "description": "Shapefile Download",
+ "title": "Shapefile Download"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://www.arcgis.com/sharing/rest/content/items/f8fb12b1bab44c11b1bee96562cc4773/info/metadata/metadata.xml?format=iso19139",
+ "conformsTo": "https://www.isotc211.org/2005/gmi",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "ISO-19139 metadata"
  }
  ],
- "identifier": "HUD005",
- "keyword": [
- "HUD",
- "cdbg",
- "community planning and development",
- "cpd",
- "esg",
- "formula grants",
- "grants",
- "home",
- "hopwa"
- ],
- "modified": "2020-04-17",
+ "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=f8fb12b1bab44c11b1bee96562cc4773&sublayer=0",
+ "issued": "2019-05-17",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Activities",
+ "FACTS",
+ "Open Data",
+ "U.S. Forest Service",
+ "environment",
+ "fire/fuels",
+ "invasive species",
+ "silviculture"
+ ],
+ "landingPage": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/usfs::activity-facts-common-attributes-feature-layer",
+ "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
+ "modified": "2026-09-24",
  "programCode": [
- "025:000"
- ],
+ "005:059"
+ ],
+ "progressCode": "onGoing",
  "publisher": {
- "@type": "org:Organization",
- "name": "U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development"
- },
- "title": "Community Planning and Development (CPD) Appropriations Budget & Allocations"
- },
- "description": "The datasets are the full-year allocations for HUD's Office of Community Planning and Development (CPD) formula programs: Community Development Block Grants (CDBG); HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME), including the American Dream Downpayment Initiative (ADDI); Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA); and Emergency Shelter Grants (ESG). HUD's CPD office seeks to develop viable communities by promoting integrated approaches that provide decent housing, a suitable living environment, and expand economic opportunities for low and moderate income persons. The primary means towards this end is the development of partnerships among all levels of government and the private sector, including for-profit and non-profit organizations. Datasets are available starting from FY2001.",
+ "name": "U.S. Forest Service",
+ "source": "U.S. Forest Service"
+ },
+ "spatial": "-151.5619,8.5730,-51.8141,64.2058",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Activity FACTS Common Attributes (Feature Layer)"
+ },
+ "description": "<div>The data in this map service is updated every weekend.</div><div></div><div><br /></div><div>Note: This data includes all activities regardless of whether there is a spatial feature attached.<br /><div><br /></div><div>Note: This is a large dataset. Metadata and Downloads are available at: https://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/edw/datasets.php?xmlKeyword=FACTS+common+attributes<br /></div><div><br /></div><div>To download FACTS activities layers, search for the activity types you want, such as timber harvest or hazardous fuels treatments. The Forest Service's Natural Resource Manager (NRM) Forest Activity Tracking System (FACTS) is the agency standard for managing information about activities related to fire/fuels, silviculture, and invasive species. This feature class contains the FACTS attributes most commonly needed to describe FACTS activities.</div></div>",
  "distribution_titles": [
- "Formula Program Allocations by State",
- "FY2020 CARES Act Grants"
- ],
- "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/c6e8d002-bf2d-424c-8f04-ebc6fc73d85f",
- "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/c6e8d002-bf2d-424c-8f04-ebc6fc73d85f/raw",
- "has_download": true,
- "has_spatial": false,
- "identifier": "HUD005",
- "keyword": [
- "HUD",
- "cdbg",
- "community planning and development",
- "cpd",
- "esg",
- "formula grants",
- "grants",
- "home",
- "hopwa"
- ],
- "last_harvested_date": "2026-09-30T15:12:49.101130",
+ "ArcGIS GeoService",
+ "CSV",
+ "GeoJSON",
+ "KML",
+ "Shapefile",
+ "ArcGIS Hub Dataset",
+ "Geodatabase Download",
+ "Shapefile Download",
+ "ISO-19139 metadata"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/613dc3fc-3ec6-41dd-8300-42f608aaab6b",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/613dc3fc-3ec6-41dd-8300-42f608aaab6b/raw",
+ "has_download": false,
+ "has_spatial": true,
+ "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=f8fb12b1bab44c11b1bee96562cc4773&sublayer=0",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Activities",
+ "FACTS",
+ "Open Data",
+ "U.S. Forest Service",
+ "environment",
+ "fire/fuels",
+ "invasive species",
+ "silviculture"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-09-30T21:32:54.009732",
  "organization": {
  "aliases": [
  "dept"
@@ -1289,96 +1058,3556 @@
  "code_repo_exempt": false,
  "code_repo_url": null,
  "description": null,
- "id": "7f8ee588-32a3-4b6c-b435-d6603c91dbcc",
- "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/hud.png",
- "name": "Department of Housing and Urban Development",
+ "id": "352b4532-793d-4075-a03f-05b778a3c43a",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/usda.png",
+ "name": "Department of Agriculture",
  "organization_type": "Federal Government",
- "slug": "hud"
+ "slug": "usda"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 2,
+ "publisher": "U.S. Forest Service",
+ "slug": "activity-facts-common-attributes-feature-layer",
+ "spatial_centroid": {
+ "lat": 30.826119999999996,
+ "lon": -111.66278
+ },
+ "spatial_shape": {
+ "coordinates": [
+ [
+ [
+ -151.5619,
+ 8.573
+ ],
+ [
+ -151.5619,
+ 64.2058
+ ],
+ [
+ -51.8141,
+ 64.2058
+ ],
+ [
+ -51.8141,
+ 8.573
+ ],
+ [
+ -151.5619,
+ 8.573
+ ]
+ ]
+ ],
+ "type": "Polygon"
+ },
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Activity FACTS Common Attributes (Feature Layer)",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 11.44037,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790803961264,
+ 11.44037,
+ 1,
+ "6e954bbf-f767-4d09-a542-3d43a0d0ad90"
+ ],
+ "dcat": {
+ "@type": "dcat:Dataset",
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "005:96"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "@type": "vcard:Contact",
+ "fn": "USFSEnterpriseContent",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:SM.FS.data@usda.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "Spatial data is collected by the National Disaster Recovery Team from each unit point of contact. The spatial locations are pulled from fire occurrence and perimeter datasets, FEMA, States, and local unit disaster response assessments. The polygons are then processed through intersections with geopolitical boundaries such as states, counties, and congressional districts as well as administrative boundaries such as regions and forests.",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://apps.fs.usda.gov/arcx/rest/services/EDW/EDW_NationalDisasterRecoveryEvents_01/MapServer/1",
+ "format": "ArcGIS GeoServices REST API",
+ "mediaType": "application/json",
+ "title": "ArcGIS GeoService"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/b8d0825a778d4646953ef5d73a4ee779/csv?layers=1",
+ "format": "CSV",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "CSV"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/b8d0825a778d4646953ef5d73a4ee779/geojson?layers=1",
+ "format": "GeoJSON",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.geo+json",
+ "title": "GeoJSON"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/b8d0825a778d4646953ef5d73a4ee779/kml?layers=1",
+ "format": "KML",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.google-earth.kml+xml",
+ "title": "KML"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/b8d0825a778d4646953ef5d73a4ee779/shapefile?layers=1",
+ "format": "ZIP",
+ "mediaType": "application/zip",
+ "title": "Shapefile"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/usfs::bdydesg-disaster-recov-event-segmented-feature-layer",
+ "format": "Web Page",
+ "mediaType": "text/html",
+ "title": "ArcGIS Hub Dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://www.arcgis.com/sharing/rest/content/items/b8d0825a778d4646953ef5d73a4ee779/info/metadata/metadata.xml?format=iso19139",
+ "conformsTo": "https://www.isotc211.org/2005/gmi",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "ISO-19139 metadata"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=b8d0825a778d4646953ef5d73a4ee779&sublayer=1",
+ "issued": "2026-03-11",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Open Data",
+ "environment"
+ ],
+ "landingPage": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/usfs::bdydesg-disaster-recov-event-segmented-feature-layer",
+ "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
+ "modified": "2026-09-23",
+ "programCode": [
+ "005:059"
+ ],
+ "progressCode": "onGoing",
+ "publisher": {
+ "name": "U.S. Forest Service",
+ "source": "USFS Chief Information Office, Enterprise Data Warehouse"
+ },
+ "spatial": "-156.6878,17.8812,-65.2442,58.4154",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "BdyDesg Disaster Recov Event Segmented (Feature layer)"
+ },
+ "description": "Spatial data is collected by the National Disaster Recovery Team from each unit point of contact. The spatial locations are pulled from fire occurrence and perimeter datasets, FEMA, States, and local unit disaster response assessments. The polygons are then processed through intersections with geopolitical boundaries such as states, counties, and congressional districts as well as administrative boundaries such as regions and forests.",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "ArcGIS GeoService",
+ "CSV",
+ "GeoJSON",
+ "KML",
+ "Shapefile",
+ "ArcGIS Hub Dataset",
+ "ISO-19139 metadata"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/a19432f5-ca43-41bb-a011-5c15a9176646",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/a19432f5-ca43-41bb-a011-5c15a9176646/raw",
+ "has_download": false,
+ "has_spatial": true,
+ "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=b8d0825a778d4646953ef5d73a4ee779&sublayer=1",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Open Data",
+ "environment"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-09-30T21:32:41.264906",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "352b4532-793d-4075-a03f-05b778a3c43a",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/usda.png",
+ "name": "Department of Agriculture",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "usda"
  },
  "parent_identifier": null,
  "popularity": 1,
- "publisher": "U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development",
- "slug": "community-planning-and-development-cpd-appropriations-budget-allocations",
+ "publisher": "U.S. Forest Service",
+ "slug": "bdydesg-disaster-recov-event-segmented-feature-layer",
+ "spatial_centroid": {
+ "lat": 34.09488,
+ "lon": -120.11036000000001
+ },
+ "spatial_shape": {
+ "coordinates": [
+ [
+ [
+ -156.6878,
+ 17.8812
+ ],
+ [
+ -156.6878,
+ 58.4154
+ ],
+ [
+ -65.2442,
+ 58.4154
+ ],
+ [
+ -65.2442,
+ 17.8812
+ ],
+ [
+ -156.6878,
+ 17.8812
+ ]
+ ]
+ ],
+ "type": "Polygon"
+ },
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "BdyDesg Disaster Recov Event Segmented (Feature layer)",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 11.52604,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790803961069,
+ 11.52604,
+ 1,
+ "8e46dfe4-93c0-4370-a5f8-d22119e4ea8b"
+ ],
+ "dcat": {
+ "@type": "dcat:Dataset",
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "005:96"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "@type": "vcard:Contact",
+ "fn": "USFSEnterpriseContent",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:SM.FS.data@usda.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "Spatial data is collected by the National Disaster Recovery Team from each unit point of contact. The spatial locations are pulled from fire occurrence and perimeter datasets, FEMA, States, and local unit disaster response assessments. The polygons are then processed through intersections with geopolitical boundaries such as states, counties, and congressional districts as well as administrative boundaries such as regions and forests.",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://apps.fs.usda.gov/arcx/rest/services/EDW/EDW_NationalDisasterRecoveryEvents_01/MapServer/1",
+ "format": "ArcGIS GeoServices REST API",
+ "mediaType": "application/json",
+ "title": "ArcGIS GeoService"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/cb2d8b8be5cb4be99e8fd05af8ec7128/csv?layers=1",
+ "format": "CSV",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "CSV"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/cb2d8b8be5cb4be99e8fd05af8ec7128/geojson?layers=1",
+ "format": "GeoJSON",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.geo+json",
+ "title": "GeoJSON"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/cb2d8b8be5cb4be99e8fd05af8ec7128/kml?layers=1",
+ "format": "KML",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.google-earth.kml+xml",
+ "title": "KML"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/cb2d8b8be5cb4be99e8fd05af8ec7128/shapefile?layers=1",
+ "format": "ZIP",
+ "mediaType": "application/zip",
+ "title": "Shapefile"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/usfs::bdydesg-disaster-recov-event-segmented",
+ "format": "Web Page",
+ "mediaType": "text/html",
+ "title": "ArcGIS Hub Dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://www.arcgis.com/sharing/rest/content/items/cb2d8b8be5cb4be99e8fd05af8ec7128/info/metadata/metadata.xml?format=iso19139",
+ "conformsTo": "https://www.isotc211.org/2005/gmi",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "ISO-19139 metadata"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=cb2d8b8be5cb4be99e8fd05af8ec7128&sublayer=1",
+ "issued": "2026-03-11",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Open Data",
+ "environment"
+ ],
+ "landingPage": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/usfs::bdydesg-disaster-recov-event-segmented",
+ "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
+ "modified": "2026-09-23",
+ "programCode": [
+ "005:059"
+ ],
+ "progressCode": "onGoing",
+ "publisher": {
+ "name": "U.S. Forest Service",
+ "source": "USFS Chief Information Office, Enterprise Data Warehouse"
+ },
+ "spatial": "-156.6878,17.8812,-65.2442,58.4154",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "BdyDesg Disaster Recov Event Segmented"
+ },
+ "description": "Spatial data is collected by the National Disaster Recovery Team from each unit point of contact. The spatial locations are pulled from fire occurrence and perimeter datasets, FEMA, States, and local unit disaster response assessments. The polygons are then processed through intersections with geopolitical boundaries such as states, counties, and congressional districts as well as administrative boundaries such as regions and forests.",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "ArcGIS GeoService",
+ "CSV",
+ "GeoJSON",
+ "KML",
+ "Shapefile",
+ "ArcGIS Hub Dataset",
+ "ISO-19139 metadata"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/96bcbd40-c8be-4ccf-947a-7ebac0a1b8ce",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/96bcbd40-c8be-4ccf-947a-7ebac0a1b8ce/raw",
+ "has_download": false,
+ "has_spatial": true,
+ "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=cb2d8b8be5cb4be99e8fd05af8ec7128&sublayer=1",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Open Data",
+ "environment"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-09-30T21:32:41.069940",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "352b4532-793d-4075-a03f-05b778a3c43a",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/usda.png",
+ "name": "Department of Agriculture",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "usda"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 1,
+ "publisher": "U.S. Forest Service",
+ "slug": "bdydesg-disaster-recov-event-segmented",
+ "spatial_centroid": {
+ "lat": 34.09488,
+ "lon": -120.11036000000001
+ },
+ "spatial_shape": {
+ "coordinates": [
+ [
+ [
+ -156.6878,
+ 17.8812
+ ],
+ [
+ -156.6878,
+ 58.4154
+ ],
+ [
+ -65.2442,
+ 58.4154
+ ],
+ [
+ -65.2442,
+ 17.8812
+ ],
+ [
+ -156.6878,
+ 17.8812
+ ]
+ ]
+ ],
+ "type": "Polygon"
+ },
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "BdyDesg Disaster Recov Event Segmented",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 11.4422035,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790803960854,
+ 11.4422035,
+ 2,
+ "0eba1a0e-4497-442a-bd08-57360bdf3f15"
+ ],
+ "dcat": {
+ "@type": "dcat:Dataset",
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "005:96"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "@type": "vcard:Contact",
+ "fn": "USFSEnterpriseContent",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:SM.FS.data@usda.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "Spatial data is collected by the National Disaster Recovery Team from each unit point of contact. The spatial locations are pulled from fire occurrence and perimeter datasets, FEMA, States, and local unit disaster response assessments. The polygons are then processed through intersections with geopolitical boundaries such as states, counties, and congressional districts as well as administrative boundaries such as regions and forests.",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://apps.fs.usda.gov/arcx/rest/services/EDW/EDW_NationalDisasterRecoveryEvents_01/MapServer/0",
+ "format": "ArcGIS GeoServices REST API",
+ "mediaType": "application/json",
+ "title": "ArcGIS GeoService"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/cb2d8b8be5cb4be99e8fd05af8ec7128/csv?layers=0",
+ "format": "CSV",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "CSV"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/cb2d8b8be5cb4be99e8fd05af8ec7128/geojson?layers=0",
+ "format": "GeoJSON",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.geo+json",
+ "title": "GeoJSON"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/cb2d8b8be5cb4be99e8fd05af8ec7128/kml?layers=0",
+ "format": "KML",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.google-earth.kml+xml",
+ "title": "KML"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/cb2d8b8be5cb4be99e8fd05af8ec7128/shapefile?layers=0",
+ "format": "ZIP",
+ "mediaType": "application/zip",
+ "title": "Shapefile"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/usfs::bdydesg-disaster-recov-event",
+ "format": "Web Page",
+ "mediaType": "text/html",
+ "title": "ArcGIS Hub Dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://www.arcgis.com/sharing/rest/content/items/cb2d8b8be5cb4be99e8fd05af8ec7128/info/metadata/metadata.xml?format=iso19139",
+ "conformsTo": "https://www.isotc211.org/2005/gmi",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "ISO-19139 metadata"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=cb2d8b8be5cb4be99e8fd05af8ec7128&sublayer=0",
+ "issued": "2026-03-11",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Open Data",
+ "environment"
+ ],
+ "landingPage": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/usfs::bdydesg-disaster-recov-event",
+ "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
+ "modified": "2026-09-23",
+ "programCode": [
+ "005:059"
+ ],
+ "progressCode": "onGoing",
+ "publisher": {
+ "name": "U.S. Forest Service",
+ "source": "USFS Chief Information Office, Enterprise Data Warehouse"
+ },
+ "spatial": "-156.6878,17.8812,-65.2442,58.4154",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "BdyDesg Disaster Recov Event"
+ },
+ "description": "Spatial data is collected by the National Disaster Recovery Team from each unit point of contact. The spatial locations are pulled from fire occurrence and perimeter datasets, FEMA, States, and local unit disaster response assessments. The polygons are then processed through intersections with geopolitical boundaries such as states, counties, and congressional districts as well as administrative boundaries such as regions and forests.",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "ArcGIS GeoService",
+ "CSV",
+ "GeoJSON",
+ "KML",
+ "Shapefile",
+ "ArcGIS Hub Dataset",
+ "ISO-19139 metadata"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/716f4d4a-9f08-48d5-849f-bde0f4a6fb9f",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/716f4d4a-9f08-48d5-849f-bde0f4a6fb9f/raw",
+ "has_download": false,
+ "has_spatial": true,
+ "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=cb2d8b8be5cb4be99e8fd05af8ec7128&sublayer=0",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Open Data",
+ "environment"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-09-30T21:32:40.854136",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "352b4532-793d-4075-a03f-05b778a3c43a",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/usda.png",
+ "name": "Department of Agriculture",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "usda"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 2,
+ "publisher": "U.S. Forest Service",
+ "slug": "bdydesg-disaster-recov-event",
+ "spatial_centroid": {
+ "lat": 34.09488,
+ "lon": -120.11036000000001
+ },
+ "spatial_shape": {
+ "coordinates": [
+ [
+ [
+ -156.6878,
+ 17.8812
+ ],
+ [
+ -156.6878,
+ 58.4154
+ ],
+ [
+ -65.2442,
+ 58.4154
+ ],
+ [
+ -65.2442,
+ 17.8812
+ ],
+ [
+ -156.6878,
+ 17.8812
+ ]
+ ]
+ ],
+ "type": "Polygon"
+ },
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "BdyDesg Disaster Recov Event",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 7.3125696,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790803958199,
+ 7.3125696,
+ 0,
+ "395580fa-658b-4cbd-926b-3816d172a1b0"
+ ],
+ "dcat": {
+ "@type": "dcat:Dataset",
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "005:96"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "@type": "vcard:Contact",
+ "fn": "USFSEnterpriseContent",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:SM.FS.data@usda.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "Contextual Definition:\nIt is required for every National Forest to have a Land Management Plan (LMP), often referred to as a forest plan.\nA Designated Area is an area or feature identified and managed to maintain its unique special character or purpose. Some categories of designated areas may be designated only by statute and some categories may be established administratively in the land management planning process or by other administrative processes of the Federal executive branch. Examples of statutorily designated areas are national heritage areas, national recreational areas, national scenic trails, wilderness areas, and wilderness study areas. Examples of administratively designated areas are experimental forests, research natural areas, scenic byways, botanical areas, and significant caves.\nLand management plan decisions may include recommendations to establish additional designated areas. Some designated areas may be formally designated or established concurrently with a plan decision, while others may not. The term \"designated area\" refers to categories of area or feature established by, or pursuant to, statute, regulation, or policy. Once established the designation continues until a subsequent decision by the appropriate authority removes the designation.\nGenerally, areas that are described in 1909.12, Chapter 20 shall be used in this recommended designated area feature class. The list in Chapter 24, exhibit 01 is not comprehensive. Some plan areas may have unique designations created by special legislation or other administrative action in addition to the types identified in this section. If a land area does not qualify as a designated area or has not been designated, but needs specific guidance, the Responsible Official may identify the area as a management area or as a geographic area to apply specific plan components in the land management plan. Eligible and Suitable Wild and Scenic Rivers will not be used in this recommended designated area feature class.\nThis feature class shows the geospatial extent of each Recommended Designated Area within land management plans, with pertinent metadata and includes data from both the 1982 and 2012 planning rules. This schema can also be used as a template to build data regionally or for individual units.\nIf and when the Recommended Designated Area becomes an official Designated Area then the authoritative data for the Designated Area will be stored in the LSRS designated area layer.\nRecommended Designated Area definition:\nAreas with a single unique special character or purpose designated by statue or administratively through regulation, policy or under the land management planning process.\nCharacteristics:\n- Is labeled as \"recommended\" or \"proposed\" AND a Designation type, regardless of a proper noun (i.e. Recommended Wilderness or Ruby Mountains Recommended Wilderness).\n- Has a single unique special character or purpose and may overlap with different Designated Areas.\n- May overlap with Geographic and Management Areas.\n- Not all LMPs include Recommended Designated Areas. However, if an LMP includes a Recommended Designated Area, it must be described in the LMP.\n- May exist as a single-part or multi-part polygon.\n- May have plan components or may only be described in the LMP without plan components.",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://apps.fs.usda.gov/arcx/rest/services/EDW/EDW_LandManagementPlanning_01/MapServer/3",
+ "format": "ArcGIS GeoServices REST API",
+ "mediaType": "application/json",
+ "title": "ArcGIS GeoService"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/a5cecab4826c4a5b9e66a0817fa30ba0/csv?layers=3",
+ "format": "CSV",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "CSV"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/a5cecab4826c4a5b9e66a0817fa30ba0/geojson?layers=3",
+ "format": "GeoJSON",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.geo+json",
+ "title": "GeoJSON"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/a5cecab4826c4a5b9e66a0817fa30ba0/kml?layers=3",
+ "format": "KML",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.google-earth.kml+xml",
+ "title": "KML"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/a5cecab4826c4a5b9e66a0817fa30ba0/shapefile?layers=3",
+ "format": "ZIP",
+ "mediaType": "application/zip",
+ "title": "Shapefile"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/usfs::bdyplan-lmp-recommendeddesignatedarea-3",
+ "format": "Web Page",
+ "mediaType": "text/html",
+ "title": "ArcGIS Hub Dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://www.arcgis.com/sharing/rest/content/items/a5cecab4826c4a5b9e66a0817fa30ba0/info/metadata/metadata.xml?format=iso19139",
+ "conformsTo": "https://www.isotc211.org/2005/gmi",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "ISO-19139 metadata"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=a5cecab4826c4a5b9e66a0817fa30ba0&sublayer=3",
+ "issued": "2026-09-17",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Archeological Area",
+ "Archeological Area",
+ "Botanical Area",
+ "Botanical Area",
+ "Experimental Forest",
+ "Experimental Forest",
+ "Experimental Range",
+ "Experimental Range",
+ "Experimental Research Area",
+ "Experimental Research Area",
+ "Forest Plan",
+ "Forest Plan",
+ "Geological Area",
+ "Geological Area",
+ "Historical Area",
+ "Historical Area",
+ "Land Management Plan",
+ "Land Management Plan",
+ "Management Areas",
+ "Management Areas",
+ "Memorial Area",
+ "Memorial Area",
+ "National Historic Trail",
+ "National Historic Trail",
+ "National Monument",
+ "National Monument",
+ "National Recreation Trail",
+ "National Recreation Trail",
+ "National Scenic Trail",
+ "National Scenic Trail",
+ "Open Data",
+ "Open Data",
+ "Paleontological Area",
+ "Paleontological Area",
+ "Planning",
+ "Planning",
+ "Recommended Wilderness",
+ "Recommended Wilderness",
+ "Recreation Area",
+ "Recreation Area",
+ "Research Natural Area",
+ "Research Natural Area",
+ "Scenic Area",
+ "Scenic Area",
+ "Scenic Byway",
+ "Scenic Byway",
+ "Significant Caves",
+ "Significant Caves",
+ "Zoological Area",
+ "Zoological Area",
+ "boundaries",
+ "boundaries",
+ "environment",
+ "environment",
+ "planningCadastre",
+ "planningCadastre"
+ ],
+ "landingPage": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/usfs::bdyplan-lmp-recommendeddesignatedarea-3",
+ "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
+ "modified": "2026-09-21",
+ "programCode": [
+ "005:059"
+ ],
+ "progressCode": "onGoing",
+ "publisher": {
+ "name": "U.S. Forest Service",
+ "source": "U.S. Forest Service"
+ },
+ "spatial": "-149.0119,31.3752,-72.9072,61.5190",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "BdyPlan LMP RecommendedDesignatedArea"
+ },
+ "description": "Contextual Definition:\nIt is required for every National Forest to have a Land Management Plan (LMP), often referred to as a forest plan.\nA Designated Area is an area or feature identified and managed to maintain its unique special character or purpose. Some categories of designated areas may be designated only by statute and some categories may be established administratively in the land management planning process or by other administrative processes of the Federal executive branch. Examples of statutorily designated areas are national heritage areas, national recreational areas, national scenic trails, wilderness areas, and wilderness study areas. Examples of administratively designated areas are experimental forests, research natural areas, scenic byways, botanical areas, and significant caves.\nLand management plan decisions may include recommendations to establish additional designated areas. Some designated areas may be formally designated or established concurrently with a plan decision, while others may not. The term \"designated area\" refers to categories of area or feature established by, or pursuant to, statute, regulation, or policy. Once established the designation continues until a subsequent decision by the appropriate authority removes the designation.\nGenerally, areas that are described in 1909.12, Chapter 20 shall be used in this recommended designated area feature class. The list in Chapter 24, exhibit 01 is not comprehensive. Some plan areas may have unique designations created by special legislation or other administrative action in addition to the types identified in this section. If a land area does not qualify as a designated area or has not been designated, but needs specific guidance, the Responsible Official may identify the area as a management area or as a geographic area to apply specific plan components in the land management plan. Eligible and Suitable Wild and Scenic Rivers will not be used in this recommended designated area feature class.\nThis feature class shows the geospatial extent of each Recommended Designated Area within land management plans, with pertinent metadata and includes data from both the 1982 and 2012 planning rules. This schema can also be used as a template to build data regionally or for individual units.\nIf and when the Recommended Designated Area becomes an official Designated Area then the authoritative data for the Designated Area will be stored in the LSRS designated area layer.\nRecommended Designated Area definition:\nAreas with a single unique special character or purpose designated by statue or administratively through regulation, policy or under the land management planning process.\nCharacteristics:\n- Is labeled as \"recommended\" or \"proposed\" AND a Designation type, regardless of a proper noun (i.e. Recommended Wilderness or Ruby Mountains Recommended Wilderness).\n- Has a single unique special character or purpose and may overlap with different Designated Areas.\n- May overlap with Geographic and Management Areas.\n- Not all LMPs include Recommended Designated Areas. However, if an LMP includes a Recommended Designated Area, it must be described in the LMP.\n- May exist as a single-part or multi-part polygon.\n- May have plan components or may only be described in the LMP without plan components.",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "ArcGIS GeoService",
+ "CSV",
+ "GeoJSON",
+ "KML",
+ "Shapefile",
+ "ArcGIS Hub Dataset",
+ "ISO-19139 metadata"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/3045ae6a-a7ba-4a0e-a2ec-54cd6005a939",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/3045ae6a-a7ba-4a0e-a2ec-54cd6005a939/raw",
+ "has_download": false,
+ "has_spatial": true,
+ "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=a5cecab4826c4a5b9e66a0817fa30ba0&sublayer=3",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Archeological Area",
+ "Archeological Area",
+ "Botanical Area",
+ "Botanical Area",
+ "Experimental Forest",
+ "Experimental Forest",
+ "Experimental Range",
+ "Experimental Range",
+ "Experimental Research Area",
+ "Experimental Research Area",
+ "Forest Plan",
+ "Forest Plan",
+ "Geological Area",
+ "Geological Area",
+ "Historical Area",
+ "Historical Area",
+ "Land Management Plan",
+ "Land Management Plan",
+ "Management Areas",
+ "Management Areas",
+ "Memorial Area",
+ "Memorial Area",
+ "National Historic Trail",
+ "National Historic Trail",
+ "National Monument",
+ "National Monument",
+ "National Recreation Trail",
+ "National Recreation Trail",
+ "National Scenic Trail",
+ "National Scenic Trail",
+ "Open Data",
+ "Open Data",
+ "Paleontological Area",
+ "Paleontological Area",
+ "Planning",
+ "Planning",
+ "Recommended Wilderness",
+ "Recommended Wilderness",
+ "Recreation Area",
+ "Recreation Area",
+ "Research Natural Area",
+ "Research Natural Area",
+ "Scenic Area",
+ "Scenic Area",
+ "Scenic Byway",
+ "Scenic Byway",
+ "Significant Caves",
+ "Significant Caves",
+ "Zoological Area",
+ "Zoological Area",
+ "boundaries",
+ "boundaries",
+ "environment",
+ "environment",
+ "planningCadastre",
+ "planningCadastre"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-09-30T21:32:38.199202",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "352b4532-793d-4075-a03f-05b778a3c43a",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/usda.png",
+ "name": "Department of Agriculture",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "usda"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 0,
+ "publisher": "U.S. Forest Service",
+ "slug": "bdyplan-lmp-recommendeddesignatedarea",
+ "spatial_centroid": {
+ "lat": 43.43272,
+ "lon": -118.57002
+ },
+ "spatial_shape": {
+ "coordinates": [
+ [
+ [
+ -149.0119,
+ 31.3752
+ ],
+ [
+ -149.0119,
+ 61.519
+ ],
+ [
+ -72.9072,
+ 61.519
+ ],
+ [
+ -72.9072,
+ 31.3752
+ ],
+ [
+ -149.0119,
+ 31.3752
+ ]
+ ]
+ ],
+ "type": "Polygon"
+ },
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "BdyPlan LMP RecommendedDesignatedArea",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 8.198537,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790803957992,
+ 8.198537,
+ 0,
+ "0e6b96f9-d723-49b7-9f06-c3386282491e"
+ ],
+ "dcat": {
+ "@type": "dcat:Dataset",
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "005:96"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "@type": "vcard:Contact",
+ "fn": "USFSEnterpriseContent",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:SM.FS.data@usda.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "Contextual Definition:\nIt is required for every National Forest to have a Land Management Plan (LMP), often referred to as a forest plan. Management Areas are land areas identified within the planning area that have the same set of applicable plan components and typically represent the management emphasis on the landscape. A management area does not have to be spatially contiguous, and it can overlap with Geographic Areas, Designated Areas, and other Management Areas. The Forest Service Handbook states that “geographic areas are based on place, while management areas are based on purpose.” This feature class shows the geospatial extent of each Management Area within the land management plan, with pertinent metadata and includes data from both the 1982 and 2012 planning rules. This schema can also be used as a template to build data regionally or for individual units.\nManagement Area definition:\nA land area identified within the planning area that has the same set of applicable plan components. A management area does not have to be spatially contiguous.\nCharacteristics:\n- Classified based on use, theme, or land type indicated in the plan. - If it is a code, the associated name needs to be populated in the source data fields.\n- Each management area needs to be defined in a plan and each polygon with the same management area Name/ID is associated with the same set of plan components.\n- Does not have to be spatially contiguous (i.e., can be a single-part or multi-part polygon).\n- Can overlap with Geographic Areas, Designated Areas, and/or different Management Area themes.\n- Cannot extend outside the land management plan or Administrative Forest boundary.",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://apps.fs.usda.gov/arcx/rest/services/EDW/EDW_LandManagementPlanning_01/MapServer/2",
+ "format": "ArcGIS GeoServices REST API",
+ "mediaType": "application/json",
+ "title": "ArcGIS GeoService"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/794646ce2dde408f9ceaaed0254ca926/csv?layers=2",
+ "format": "CSV",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "CSV"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/794646ce2dde408f9ceaaed0254ca926/geojson?layers=2",
+ "format": "GeoJSON",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.geo+json",
+ "title": "GeoJSON"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/794646ce2dde408f9ceaaed0254ca926/kml?layers=2",
+ "format": "KML",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.google-earth.kml+xml",
+ "title": "KML"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/794646ce2dde408f9ceaaed0254ca926/shapefile?layers=2",
+ "format": "ZIP",
+ "mediaType": "application/zip",
+ "title": "Shapefile"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/usfs::bdyplan-lmp-managementarea-3",
+ "format": "Web Page",
+ "mediaType": "text/html",
+ "title": "ArcGIS Hub Dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://www.arcgis.com/sharing/rest/content/items/794646ce2dde408f9ceaaed0254ca926/info/metadata/metadata.xml?format=iso19139",
+ "conformsTo": "https://www.isotc211.org/2005/gmi",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "ISO-19139 metadata"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=794646ce2dde408f9ceaaed0254ca926&sublayer=2",
+ "issued": "2026-09-17",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Administrative",
+ "Administrative",
+ "Allocation",
+ "Allocation",
+ "Backcountry",
+ "Backcountry",
+ "Cultural",
+ "Cultural",
+ "Ecosystem",
+ "Ecosystem",
+ "Forest Plan",
+ "Forest Plan",
+ "Geologic",
+ "Geologic",
+ "Habitat Enhanced",
+ "Habitat Enhanced",
+ "Habitat Protected",
+ "Habitat Protected",
+ "Historic",
+ "Historic",
+ "Land Management Plan",
+ "Land Management Plan",
+ "Management Areas",
+ "Management Areas",
+ "Open Data",
+ "Open Data",
+ "Planning",
+ "Planning",
+ "Prescription",
+ "Prescription",
+ "Protected",
+ "Protected",
+ "Recreation",
+ "Recreation",
+ "Recreation Developed",
+ "Recreation Developed",
+ "Recreation Dispersed",
+ "Recreation Dispersed",
+ "Resources",
+ "Resources",
+ "Riparian",
+ "Riparian",
+ "Scenic",
+ "Scenic",
+ "Soil",
+ "Soil",
+ "Utilities",
+ "Utilities",
+ "Vegetation",
+ "Vegetation",
+ "Water",
+ "Water",
+ "Watershed",
+ "Watershed",
+ "Wildland Urban Interface",
+ "Wildland Urban Interface",
+ "boundaries",
+ "boundaries",
+ "environment",
+ "environment",
+ "planningCadastre",
+ "planningCadastre"
+ ],
+ "landingPage": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/usfs::bdyplan-lmp-managementarea-3",
+ "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
+ "modified": "2026-09-21",
+ "programCode": [
+ "005:059"
+ ],
+ "progressCode": "onGoing",
+ "publisher": {
+ "name": "U.S. Forest Service",
+ "source": "U.S. Forest Service"
+ },
+ "spatial": "-150.0079,28.9602,-70.7609,61.5190",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "BdyPlan LMP ManagementArea"
+ },
+ "description": "Contextual Definition:\nIt is required for every National Forest to have a Land Management Plan (LMP), often referred to as a forest plan. Management Areas are land areas identified within the planning area that have the same set of applicable plan components and typically represent the management emphasis on the landscape. A management area does not have to be spatially contiguous, and it can overlap with Geographic Areas, Designated Areas, and other Management Areas. The Forest Service Handbook states that “geographic areas are based on place, while management areas are based on purpose.” This feature class shows the geospatial extent of each Management Area within the land management plan, with pertinent metadata and includes data from both the 1982 and 2012 planning rules. This schema can also be used as a template to build data regionally or for individual units.\nManagement Area definition:\nA land area identified within the planning area that has the same set of applicable plan components. A management area does not have to be spatially contiguous.\nCharacteristics:\n- Classified based on use, theme, or land type indicated in the plan. - If it is a code, the associated name needs to be populated in the source data fields.\n- Each management area needs to be defined in a plan and each polygon with the same management area Name/ID is associated with the same set of plan components.\n- Does not have to be spatially contiguous (i.e., can be a single-part or multi-part polygon).\n- Can overlap with Geographic Areas, Designated Areas, and/or different Management Area themes.\n- Cannot extend outside the land management plan or Administrative Forest boundary.",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "ArcGIS GeoService",
+ "CSV",
+ "GeoJSON",
+ "KML",
+ "Shapefile",
+ "ArcGIS Hub Dataset",
+ "ISO-19139 metadata"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/a88d8d8e-2050-4b9c-8ce9-5e762f8e2d51",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/a88d8d8e-2050-4b9c-8ce9-5e762f8e2d51/raw",
+ "has_download": false,
+ "has_spatial": true,
+ "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=794646ce2dde408f9ceaaed0254ca926&sublayer=2",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Administrative",
+ "Administrative",
+ "Allocation",
+ "Allocation",
+ "Backcountry",
+ "Backcountry",
+ "Cultural",
+ "Cultural",
+ "Ecosystem",
+ "Ecosystem",
+ "Forest Plan",
+ "Forest Plan",
+ "Geologic",
+ "Geologic",
+ "Habitat Enhanced",
+ "Habitat Enhanced",
+ "Habitat Protected",
+ "Habitat Protected",
+ "Historic",
+ "Historic",
+ "Land Management Plan",
+ "Land Management Plan",
+ "Management Areas",
+ "Management Areas",
+ "Open Data",
+ "Open Data",
+ "Planning",
+ "Planning",
+ "Prescription",
+ "Prescription",
+ "Protected",
+ "Protected",
+ "Recreation",
+ "Recreation",
+ "Recreation Developed",
+ "Recreation Developed",
+ "Recreation Dispersed",
+ "Recreation Dispersed",
+ "Resources",
+ "Resources",
+ "Riparian",
+ "Riparian",
+ "Scenic",
+ "Scenic",
+ "Soil",
+ "Soil",
+ "Utilities",
+ "Utilities",
+ "Vegetation",
+ "Vegetation",
+ "Water",
+ "Water",
+ "Watershed",
+ "Watershed",
+ "Wildland Urban Interface",
+ "Wildland Urban Interface",
+ "boundaries",
+ "boundaries",
+ "environment",
+ "environment",
+ "planningCadastre",
+ "planningCadastre"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-09-30T21:32:37.992286",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "352b4532-793d-4075-a03f-05b778a3c43a",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/usda.png",
+ "name": "Department of Agriculture",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "usda"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 0,
+ "publisher": "U.S. Forest Service",
+ "slug": "bdyplan-lmp-managementarea",
+ "spatial_centroid": {
+ "lat": 41.98372,
+ "lon": -118.30910000000002
+ },
+ "spatial_shape": {
+ "coordinates": [
+ [
+ [
+ -150.0079,
+ 28.9602
+ ],
+ [
+ -150.0079,
+ 61.519
+ ],
+ [
+ -70.7609,
+ 61.519
+ ],
+ [
+ -70.7609,
+ 28.9602
+ ],
+ [
+ -150.0079,
+ 28.9602
+ ]
+ ]
+ ],
+ "type": "Polygon"
+ },
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "BdyPlan LMP ManagementArea",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 10.689053,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790803957789,
+ 10.689053,
+ 0,
+ "23bd2a7c-a913-43bf-88a0-8f0635d04ee3"
+ ],
+ "dcat": {
+ "@type": "dcat:Dataset",
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "005:96"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "@type": "vcard:Contact",
+ "fn": "USFSEnterpriseContent",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:SM.FS.data@usda.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "Contextual Definition of Geographic Areas:\nIt is required for every National Forest to have a Land Management Plan (LMP), often referred to as a Forest Plan. Every plan must have management areas or geographic areas or both. The 2012 Planning Rule defines geographic areas as “spatially contiguous land areas identified within the planning area. A geographic area may overlap with a management area.” The Forest Service Handbook states that “geographic areas are based on place, while management areas are based on purpose. A typical geographic area map represents large areas that have desired conditions with a range of possible resource management emphases. Rather than a management emphasis map, a geographic area map tends to focus on a place (Red Rock Canyon, Mount Whitney, or perhaps a specific watershed).”\nGeographic Areas have an associated place name naming convention. They are identified in a LMP and are identified with plan components that detail how these areas will be managed. These areas are based on specific “places” and not “themes” like Management Areas. For example, “Hanging Lake Meadow” is a Geographic Area, but a “ski-area” is an example of a Management Area. This feature class shows the geospatial extent of each Geographic Area within land management plans, with pertinent metadata and includes data from both the 1982 and 2012 planning rules. This schema can also be used as a template to build data regionally or for individual units. Characteristics:\n- Based on “place”.\n- Has a different set of plan components than Management Areas.\n- Generally contiguous polygons, but may be a multi-part polygon due to private lands.\n- Polygons must be semi-contiguous and in close proximity.\n- Can overlap with Management Areas or Designated Areas.\n- Do not overlap with other Geographic Areas.\n- Cannot extend outside the land management plan or Administrative Forest Boundary.",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://apps.fs.usda.gov/arcx/rest/services/EDW/EDW_LandManagementPlanning_01/MapServer/1",
+ "format": "ArcGIS GeoServices REST API",
+ "mediaType": "application/json",
+ "title": "ArcGIS GeoService"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/6ae769662b07489791936451e870d9d6/csv?layers=1",
+ "format": "CSV",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "CSV"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/6ae769662b07489791936451e870d9d6/geojson?layers=1",
+ "format": "GeoJSON",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.geo+json",
+ "title": "GeoJSON"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/6ae769662b07489791936451e870d9d6/kml?layers=1",
+ "format": "KML",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.google-earth.kml+xml",
+ "title": "KML"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/6ae769662b07489791936451e870d9d6/shapefile?layers=1",
+ "format": "ZIP",
+ "mediaType": "application/zip",
+ "title": "Shapefile"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/usfs::bdyplan-lmp-geographicarea-3",
+ "format": "Web Page",
+ "mediaType": "text/html",
+ "title": "ArcGIS Hub Dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://www.arcgis.com/sharing/rest/content/items/6ae769662b07489791936451e870d9d6/info/metadata/metadata.xml?format=iso19139",
+ "conformsTo": "https://www.isotc211.org/2005/gmi",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "ISO-19139 metadata"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=6ae769662b07489791936451e870d9d6&sublayer=1",
+ "issued": "2026-09-17",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Forest Plan",
+ "Forest Plan",
+ "Geographic Areas",
+ "Geographic Areas",
+ "Land Management Plan",
+ "Land Management Plan",
+ "Land and Resource Management Plan",
+ "Land and Resource Management Plan",
+ "Open Data",
+ "Open Data",
+ "Planning",
+ "Planning",
+ "boundaries",
+ "boundaries",
+ "environment",
+ "environment",
+ "planningCadastre",
+ "planningCadastre"
+ ],
+ "landingPage": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/usfs::bdyplan-lmp-geographicarea-3",
+ "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
+ "modified": "2026-09-21",
+ "programCode": [
+ "005:059"
+ ],
+ "progressCode": "onGoing",
+ "publisher": {
+ "name": "U.S. Forest Service",
+ "source": "U.S. Forest Service"
+ },
+ "spatial": "-150.0079,31.3323,-79.0422,61.5190",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "BdyPlan LMP GeographicArea"
+ },
+ "description": "Contextual Definition of Geographic Areas:\nIt is required for every National Forest to have a Land Management Plan (LMP), often referred to as a Forest Plan. Every plan must have management areas or geographic areas or both. The 2012 Planning Rule defines geographic areas as “spatially contiguous land areas identified within the planning area. A geographic area may overlap with a management area.” The Forest Service Handbook states that “geographic areas are based on place, while management areas are based on purpose. A typical geographic area map represents large areas that have desired conditions with a range of possible resource management emphases. Rather than a management emphasis map, a geographic area map tends to focus on a place (Red Rock Canyon, Mount Whitney, or perhaps a specific watershed).”\nGeographic Areas have an associated place name naming convention. They are identified in a LMP and are identified with plan components that detail how these areas will be managed. These areas are based on specific “places” and not “themes” like Management Areas. For example, “Hanging Lake Meadow” is a Geographic Area, but a “ski-area” is an example of a Management Area. This feature class shows the geospatial extent of each Geographic Area within land management plans, with pertinent metadata and includes data from both the 1982 and 2012 planning rules. This schema can also be used as a template to build data regionally or for individual units. Characteristics:\n- Based on “place”.\n- Has a different set of plan components than Management Areas.\n- Generally contiguous polygons, but may be a multi-part polygon due to private lands.\n- Polygons must be semi-contiguous and in close proximity.\n- Can overlap with Management Areas or Designated Areas.\n- Do not overlap with other Geographic Areas.\n- Cannot extend outside the land management plan or Administrative Forest Boundary.",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "ArcGIS GeoService",
+ "CSV",
+ "GeoJSON",
+ "KML",
+ "Shapefile",
+ "ArcGIS Hub Dataset",
+ "ISO-19139 metadata"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/f4fb224e-1eb8-4b45-b3d4-abbe303f22ce",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/f4fb224e-1eb8-4b45-b3d4-abbe303f22ce/raw",
+ "has_download": false,
+ "has_spatial": true,
+ "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=6ae769662b07489791936451e870d9d6&sublayer=1",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Forest Plan",
+ "Forest Plan",
+ "Geographic Areas",
+ "Geographic Areas",
+ "Land Management Plan",
+ "Land Management Plan",
+ "Land and Resource Management Plan",
+ "Land and Resource Management Plan",
+ "Open Data",
+ "Open Data",
+ "Planning",
+ "Planning",
+ "boundaries",
+ "boundaries",
+ "environment",
+ "environment",
+ "planningCadastre",
+ "planningCadastre"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-09-30T21:32:37.789666",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "352b4532-793d-4075-a03f-05b778a3c43a",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/usda.png",
+ "name": "Department of Agriculture",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "usda"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 0,
+ "publisher": "U.S. Forest Service",
+ "slug": "bdyplan-lmp-geographicarea",
+ "spatial_centroid": {
+ "lat": 43.40698,
+ "lon": -121.62162000000001
+ },
+ "spatial_shape": {
+ "coordinates": [
+ [
+ [
+ -150.0079,
+ 31.3323
+ ],
+ [
+ -150.0079,
+ 61.519
+ ],
+ [
+ -79.0422,
+ 61.519
+ ],
+ [
+ -79.0422,
+ 31.3323
+ ],
+ [
+ -150.0079,
+ 31.3323
+ ]
+ ]
+ ],
+ "type": "Polygon"
+ },
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "BdyPlan LMP GeographicArea",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 11.159971,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790803957079,
+ 11.159971,
+ 8,
+ "aa1b5be6-4212-42a5-8cd6-319b4fa91ee4"
+ ],
+ "dcat": {
+ "@type": "dcat:Dataset",
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "005:96"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "@type": "vcard:Contact",
+ "fn": "USFSEnterpriseContent",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:SM.FS.data@usda.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "Allotment is a feature class in the Rangeland Management data set. It represents the area boundaries of livestock grazing allotments that include active pastures associated with the allotment. The area corresponds to tabular data in the RIMS (Rangeland Information Management System).",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://apps.fs.usda.gov/arcx/rest/services/EDW/EDW_RangeManagement_01/MapServer/0",
+ "format": "ArcGIS GeoServices REST API",
+ "mediaType": "application/json",
+ "title": "ArcGIS GeoService"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/8683e877aa084121abdebf6caac04b10/csv?layers=0",
+ "format": "CSV",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "CSV"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/8683e877aa084121abdebf6caac04b10/geojson?layers=0",
+ "format": "GeoJSON",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.geo+json",
+ "title": "GeoJSON"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/8683e877aa084121abdebf6caac04b10/kml?layers=0",
+ "format": "KML",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.google-earth.kml+xml",
+ "title": "KML"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/8683e877aa084121abdebf6caac04b10/shapefile?layers=0",
+ "format": "ZIP",
+ "mediaType": "application/zip",
+ "title": "Shapefile"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/usfs::allotment-2",
+ "format": "Web Page",
+ "mediaType": "text/html",
+ "title": "ArcGIS Hub Dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://www.arcgis.com/sharing/rest/content/items/8683e877aa084121abdebf6caac04b10/info/metadata/metadata.xml?format=iso19139",
+ "conformsTo": "https://www.isotc211.org/2005/gmi",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "ISO-19139 metadata"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=8683e877aa084121abdebf6caac04b10&sublayer=0",
+ "issued": "2025-06-04",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Boundaries",
+ "Environment",
+ "Farming",
+ "Open Data"
+ ],
+ "landingPage": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/usfs::allotment-2",
+ "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
+ "modified": "2026-09-22",
+ "programCode": [
+ "005:059"
+ ],
+ "progressCode": "onGoing",
+ "publisher": {
+ "name": "U.S. Forest Service",
+ "source": "USDA Forest Service"
+ },
+ "spatial": "-124.3012,30.6588,-76.7340,49.0001",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Allotment"
+ },
+ "description": "Allotment is a feature class in the Rangeland Management data set. It represents the area boundaries of livestock grazing allotments that include active pastures associated with the allotment. The area corresponds to tabular data in the RIMS (Rangeland Information Management System).",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "ArcGIS GeoService",
+ "CSV",
+ "GeoJSON",
+ "KML",
+ "Shapefile",
+ "ArcGIS Hub Dataset",
+ "ISO-19139 metadata"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/e106b88a-8902-4e84-b028-c2e87ffc26e9",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/e106b88a-8902-4e84-b028-c2e87ffc26e9/raw",
+ "has_download": false,
+ "has_spatial": true,
+ "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=8683e877aa084121abdebf6caac04b10&sublayer=0",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Boundaries",
+ "Environment",
+ "Farming",
+ "Open Data"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-09-30T21:32:37.079228",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "352b4532-793d-4075-a03f-05b778a3c43a",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/usda.png",
+ "name": "Department of Agriculture",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "usda"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 8,
+ "publisher": "U.S. Forest Service",
+ "slug": "range-unit-allotment",
+ "spatial_centroid": {
+ "lat": 37.99532000000001,
+ "lon": -105.27431999999999
+ },
+ "spatial_shape": {
+ "coordinates": [
+ [
+ [
+ -124.3012,
+ 30.6588
+ ],
+ [
+ -124.3012,
+ 49.0001
+ ],
+ [
+ -76.734,
+ 49.0001
+ ],
+ [
+ -76.734,
+ 30.6588
+ ],
+ [
+ -124.3012,
+ 30.6588
+ ]
+ ]
+ ],
+ "type": "Polygon"
+ },
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Allotment",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 11.150845,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790803956439,
+ 11.150845,
+ 1,
+ "30b23d04-453a-4cda-949d-f13b3c3781d4"
+ ],
+ "dcat": {
+ "@type": "dcat:Dataset",
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "005:96"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "@type": "vcard:Contact",
+ "fn": "USFSEnterpriseContent",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:SM.FS.data@usda.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "Pasture is a feature class in the Rangeland Management data set. It represents the area boundaries of livestock grazing pastures. The area corresponds to tabular data in the RIMS (Rangeland Information Management System).",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://apps.fs.usda.gov/arcx/rest/services/EDW/EDW_RangeManagement_01/MapServer/3",
+ "format": "ArcGIS GeoServices REST API",
+ "mediaType": "application/json",
+ "title": "ArcGIS GeoService"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/6f398ddbfe0f4aefaec59e1ac2d2bd1b/csv?layers=3",
+ "format": "CSV",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "CSV"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/6f398ddbfe0f4aefaec59e1ac2d2bd1b/geojson?layers=3",
+ "format": "GeoJSON",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.geo+json",
+ "title": "GeoJSON"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/6f398ddbfe0f4aefaec59e1ac2d2bd1b/kml?layers=3",
+ "format": "KML",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.google-earth.kml+xml",
+ "title": "KML"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/6f398ddbfe0f4aefaec59e1ac2d2bd1b/shapefile?layers=3",
+ "format": "ZIP",
+ "mediaType": "application/zip",
+ "title": "Shapefile"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/usfs::pasture-1",
+ "format": "Web Page",
+ "mediaType": "text/html",
+ "title": "ArcGIS Hub Dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://www.arcgis.com/sharing/rest/content/items/6f398ddbfe0f4aefaec59e1ac2d2bd1b/info/metadata/metadata.xml?format=iso19139",
+ "conformsTo": "https://www.isotc211.org/2005/gmi",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "ISO-19139 metadata"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=6f398ddbfe0f4aefaec59e1ac2d2bd1b&sublayer=3",
+ "issued": "2025-06-04",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Boundaries",
+ "Environment",
+ "Farming",
+ "Open Data"
+ ],
+ "landingPage": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/usfs::pasture-1",
+ "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
+ "modified": "2026-09-22",
+ "programCode": [
+ "005:059"
+ ],
+ "progressCode": "onGoing",
+ "publisher": {
+ "name": "U.S. Forest Service",
+ "source": "USDA Forest Service"
+ },
+ "spatial": "-124.3012,30.6588,-76.7340,49.0001",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Pasture"
+ },
+ "description": "Pasture is a feature class in the Rangeland Management data set. It represents the area boundaries of livestock grazing pastures. The area corresponds to tabular data in the RIMS (Rangeland Information Management System).",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "ArcGIS GeoService",
+ "CSV",
+ "GeoJSON",
+ "KML",
+ "Shapefile",
+ "ArcGIS Hub Dataset",
+ "ISO-19139 metadata"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/d3f22ea4-4f5f-4264-9de7-0701f8766dbf",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/d3f22ea4-4f5f-4264-9de7-0701f8766dbf/raw",
+ "has_download": false,
+ "has_spatial": true,
+ "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=6f398ddbfe0f4aefaec59e1ac2d2bd1b&sublayer=3",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Boundaries",
+ "Environment",
+ "Farming",
+ "Open Data"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-09-30T21:32:36.439733",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "352b4532-793d-4075-a03f-05b778a3c43a",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/usda.png",
+ "name": "Department of Agriculture",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "usda"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 1,
+ "publisher": "U.S. Forest Service",
+ "slug": "range-unit-pasture",
+ "spatial_centroid": {
+ "lat": 37.99532000000001,
+ "lon": -105.27431999999999
+ },
+ "spatial_shape": {
+ "coordinates": [
+ [
+ [
+ -124.3012,
+ 30.6588
+ ],
+ [
+ -124.3012,
+ 49.0001
+ ],
+ [
+ -76.734,
+ 49.0001
+ ],
+ [
+ -76.734,
+ 30.6588
+ ],
+ [
+ -124.3012,
+ 30.6588
+ ]
+ ]
+ ],
+ "type": "Polygon"
+ },
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Pasture",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 11.116957,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790803955980,
+ 11.116957,
+ 1,
+ "0555c0c1-28cb-46aa-a553-8daf806c68bf"
+ ],
+ "dcat": {
+ "@type": "dcat:Dataset",
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "005:96"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "@type": "vcard:Contact",
+ "fn": "USFSEnterpriseContent",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:SM.FS.data@usda.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "Key area is a feature class in the Rangeland Management data set. It represents an area where short term monitoring occurs within a pasture. The area corresponds to tabular data in the RIMS (Rangeland Information Management System).",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://apps.fs.usda.gov/arcx/rest/services/EDW/EDW_RangeManagement_01/MapServer/5",
+ "format": "ArcGIS GeoServices REST API",
+ "mediaType": "application/json",
+ "title": "ArcGIS GeoService"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/8e8b8b4a52f24d94a59db1d5ed662332/csv?layers=5",
+ "format": "CSV",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "CSV"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/8e8b8b4a52f24d94a59db1d5ed662332/geojson?layers=5",
+ "format": "GeoJSON",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.geo+json",
+ "title": "GeoJSON"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/8e8b8b4a52f24d94a59db1d5ed662332/kml?layers=5",
+ "format": "KML",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.google-earth.kml+xml",
+ "title": "KML"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/8e8b8b4a52f24d94a59db1d5ed662332/shapefile?layers=5",
+ "format": "ZIP",
+ "mediaType": "application/zip",
+ "title": "Shapefile"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/usfs::key-area",
+ "format": "Web Page",
+ "mediaType": "text/html",
+ "title": "ArcGIS Hub Dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://www.arcgis.com/sharing/rest/content/items/8e8b8b4a52f24d94a59db1d5ed662332/info/metadata/metadata.xml?format=iso19139",
+ "conformsTo": "https://www.isotc211.org/2005/gmi",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "ISO-19139 metadata"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=8e8b8b4a52f24d94a59db1d5ed662332&sublayer=5",
+ "issued": "2025-04-05",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Boundaries",
+ "Environment",
+ "Farming",
+ "Open Data"
+ ],
+ "landingPage": "https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/usfs::key-area",
+ "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
+ "modified": "2026-09-22",
+ "programCode": [
+ "005:059"
+ ],
+ "progressCode": "onGoing",
+ "publisher": {
+ "name": "U.S. Forest Service",
+ "source": "USDA Forest Service"
+ },
+ "spatial": "-121.6773,33.4351,-93.2425,46.2862",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Key Area"
+ },
+ "description": "Key area is a feature class in the Rangeland Management data set. It represents an area where short term monitoring occurs within a pasture. The area corresponds to tabular data in the RIMS (Rangeland Information Management System).",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "ArcGIS GeoService",
+ "CSV",
+ "GeoJSON",
+ "KML",
+ "Shapefile",
+ "ArcGIS Hub Dataset",
+ "ISO-19139 metadata"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/6638b1ad-780a-46e7-9766-1d710e92c56e",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/6638b1ad-780a-46e7-9766-1d710e92c56e/raw",
+ "has_download": false,
+ "has_spatial": true,
+ "identifier": "https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=8e8b8b4a52f24d94a59db1d5ed662332&sublayer=5",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Boundaries",
+ "Environment",
+ "Farming",
+ "Open Data"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-09-30T21:32:35.980197",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "352b4532-793d-4075-a03f-05b778a3c43a",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/usda.png",
+ "name": "Department of Agriculture",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "usda"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 1,
+ "publisher": "U.S. Forest Service",
+ "slug": "range-keyarea",
+ "spatial_centroid": {
+ "lat": 38.575540000000004,
+ "lon": -110.30338000000002
+ },
+ "spatial_shape": {
+ "coordinates": [
+ [
+ [
+ -121.6773,
+ 33.4351
+ ],
+ [
+ -121.6773,
+ 46.2862
+ ],
+ [
+ -93.2425,
+ 46.2862
+ ],
+ [
+ -93.2425,
+ 33.4351
+ ],
+ [
+ -121.6773,
+ 33.4351
+ ]
+ ]
+ ],
+ "type": "Polygon"
+ },
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Key Area",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 6.2751045,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790803955667,
+ 6.2751045,
+ 0,
+ "4b219871-960d-4820-ac14-b53c45fe4104"
+ ],
+ "dcat": {
+ "@type": "dcat:Dataset",
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "accrualPeriodicity": "irregular",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "005:18",
+ "005:20"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "fn": "Morrison, William R.",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:william.morrison@usda.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "<p dir=\"ltr\"><i>Source Insects</i></p><p dir=\"ltr\">Mixed-sex adults of <i>S. oryzae</i> and <i>P. truncatus</i> were used in all experiments for this study. These insects were cultured on organic soft wheat (var. Mexa) and maize (var Dias), respectively, and maintained in incubators under constant abiotic conditions at 27 ± 0.1°C, 55 ± 1 % relative humidity (r.h.), and 14:10 (L:D) h photoperiod<i>.</i> Colonies were maintained at the Laboratory of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology (LEAZ), at the Department of Agriculture, Crop Production and Rural Environment, University of Thessaly, Greece.</p><p dir=\"ltr\"><i>Insecticide formulations for concrete surfaces and for grain treatment</i></p><p dir=\"ltr\">We used the formulation Teenox<sup>®</sup> EC (Armosa Tech S.A., Engis, Belgium), that contains 10% w/v of azamethiphos. Concrete arenas were prepared for testing by first mixing a slurry of water and cement in a large pitcher (Rockite, Cleveland, OH, US). Briefly, water was added until a thick paste consistency was achieved. The mixture then sat for 1 min before it was stirred vigorously, making sure any remaining clumps of dry Rockite were hydrated. Once the mixture was a loose, batter-like consistency, 8.5 ml of the slurry was poured into plastic Petri dishes (90 mm in diameter and 15 mm in height; area of the bottom: 63.61 cm<sup>2</sup>; hereafter, arenas). The slurry was poured to create a surface of approximately 0.5 cm thick. The cement dishes were then left at room temperature to cure for 24 h. The insecticide treatments that were sprayed onto the concrete arenas included: control (distilled H<sub>2</sub>O) and with the corresponding concentrations being 5 x 10<sup>-6</sup>, 5 x 10<sup>-4 </sup>and 5 x 10<sup>-3 </sup>mg a.i./cm². We selected these concentrations, as the label concentrations of Teenox<sup>®</sup> EC vary, depending of the target species and key application scenario.</p><p dir=\"ltr\">Untreated, clean, and uninfested maize and wheat were used in the experiments that had been frozen for 72 h beforehand to ensure no prior infestation. The insecticide treatments were sprayed onto 500 g lots of maize or wheat with an artist’s airbrush sprayer (Badger 100 series, Badger Corporation, Franklin Park, IL, US; designed to spray a line 3.2–50.8 mm wide with materials of high viscosity) at a pressure of 0.70 kg/cm<sup>2</sup> for each treatment listed above. For both maize and wheat, Teenox<sup>®</sup> EC was applied on grain at 0.01, 1, and 10 ppm (mg of active ingredient per kg of grain), in order to cover a wide range of concentrations, given that this is the first time that Teenox<sup>®</sup> EC is tested on grains. The insecticide was applied on maize or wheat grain in three separate formulation events on different days, one for each replicate.</p><p dir=\"ltr\"><i>Experimental Setup</i></p><p dir=\"ltr\">Cohorts of 10 mixed-sex adult <i>S. oryzae</i> and <i>P. truncatus</i> were exposed for 24, 48, and 168 h periods on concrete and 72 h, 7 and 14 d in grain. <i>Sitophilus oryzae</i> was tested on wheat and <i>P. truncatus</i> was tested on maize. The cohorts were added to separate vials filled with 10 g of grain. After the exposure period, individuals were removed and placed into a clean Petri dish with filter paper and evaluated for condition. Using a stereomicroscope (SMZ-18, Nikon Inc., Tokyo, Japan) under 60× magnification, insects<i> </i>were classified as alive (moving normally, is able to right itself when flipped over, no twitching), affected (moving sluggishly or erratically, unable to right itself, twitching of antennae or legs may be present), or dead (completely immobile even after prodding). After evaluating insect mortality on grain on day 14, adults were removed from the vials, and commodity was kept for 65 d to assess progeny production.</p>",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/67776549",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "teenox_rw_lagb_concrete_assay_agdata_commons.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/67776552",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "teenox_rw_lagb_grain_assay_agdata_commons.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/67776555",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "progenyteenoxcombined.csv"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "10.15482/USDA.ADC/33318054.v1",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Azamethiphos",
+ "European Union",
+ "Greece",
+ "Prostephanus truncatus",
+ "Sitophilus oryzae",
+ "University of Thessaly",
+ "bulk storage",
+ "concrete",
+ "crack-and-crevice",
+ "exposure assay",
+ "food facilities",
+ "grain",
+ "grain protectant",
+ "insecticides",
+ "laboratory",
+ "larger grain borer",
+ "maize",
+ "organophosphate",
+ "processing",
+ "rice weevil",
+ "stored product insects",
+ "stored products",
+ "wheat"
+ ],
+ "license": "https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/",
+ "modified": "2026-08-28",
+ "programCode": [
+ "005:040"
+ ],
+ "publisher": {
+ "@type": "org:Organization",
+ "name": "Agricultural Research Service"
+ },
+ "spatial": "{\"type\": \"Point\", \"coordinates\": [22.94084880702261, 39.393638539142074]}",
+ "temporal": "2025-07-01/2026-09-01",
+ "title": "Data from: A new organophosphate in stored-product protection? Efficacy of azamethiphos for the control of <i>Sitophilus oryzae </i>(L.) and<i> Prostephanus truncatus</i> (Horn)"
+ },
+ "description": "<p dir=\"ltr\"><i>Source Insects</i></p><p dir=\"ltr\">Mixed-sex adults of <i>S. oryzae</i> and <i>P. truncatus</i> were used in all experiments for this study. These insects were cultured on organic soft wheat (var. Mexa) and maize (var Dias), respectively, and maintained in incubators under constant abiotic conditions at 27 ± 0.1°C, 55 ± 1 % relative humidity (r.h.), and 14:10 (L:D) h photoperiod<i>.</i> Colonies were maintained at the Laboratory of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology (LEAZ), at the Department of Agriculture, Crop Production and Rural Environment, University of Thessaly, Greece.</p><p dir=\"ltr\"><i>Insecticide formulations for concrete surfaces and for grain treatment</i></p><p dir=\"ltr\">We used the formulation Teenox<sup>®</sup> EC (Armosa Tech S.A., Engis, Belgium), that contains 10% w/v of azamethiphos. Concrete arenas were prepared for testing by first mixing a slurry of water and cement in a large pitcher (Rockite, Cleveland, OH, US). Briefly, water was added until a thick paste consistency was achieved. The mixture then sat for 1 min before it was stirred vigorously, making sure any remaining clumps of dry Rockite were hydrated. Once the mixture was a loose, batter-like consistency, 8.5 ml of the slurry was poured into plastic Petri dishes (90 mm in diameter and 15 mm in height; area of the bottom: 63.61 cm<sup>2</sup>; hereafter, arenas). The slurry was poured to create a surface of approximately 0.5 cm thick. The cement dishes were then left at room temperature to cure for 24 h. The insecticide treatments that were sprayed onto the concrete arenas included: control (distilled H<sub>2</sub>O) and with the corresponding concentrations being 5 x 10<sup>-6</sup>, 5 x 10<sup>-4 </sup>and 5 x 10<sup>-3 </sup>mg a.i./cm². We selected these concentrations, as the label concentrations of Teenox<sup>®</sup> EC vary, depending of the target species and key application scenario.</p><p dir=\"ltr\">Untreated, clean, and uninfested maize and wheat were used in the experiments that had been frozen for 72 h beforehand to ensure no prior infestation. The insecticide treatments were sprayed onto 500 g lots of maize or wheat with an artist’s airbrush sprayer (Badger 100 series, Badger Corporation, Franklin Park, IL, US; designed to spray a line 3.2–50.8 mm wide with materials of high viscosity) at a pressure of 0.70 kg/cm<sup>2</sup> for each treatment listed above. For both maize and wheat, Teenox<sup>®</sup> EC was applied on grain at 0.01, 1, and 10 ppm (mg of active ingredient per kg of grain), in order to cover a wide range of concentrations, given that this is the first time that Teenox<sup>®</sup> EC is tested on grains. The insecticide was applied on maize or wheat grain in three separate formulation events on different days, one for each replicate.</p><p dir=\"ltr\"><i>Experimental Setup</i></p><p dir=\"ltr\">Cohorts of 10 mixed-sex adult <i>S. oryzae</i> and <i>P. truncatus</i> were exposed for 24, 48, and 168 h periods on concrete and 72 h, 7 and 14 d in grain. <i>Sitophilus oryzae</i> was tested on wheat and <i>P. truncatus</i> was tested on maize. The cohorts were added to separate vials filled with 10 g of grain. After the exposure period, individuals were removed and placed into a clean Petri dish with filter paper and evaluated for condition. Using a stereomicroscope (SMZ-18, Nikon Inc., Tokyo, Japan) under 60× magnification, insects<i> </i>were classified as alive (moving normally, is able to right itself when flipped over, no twitching), affected (moving sluggishly or erratically, unable to right itself, twitching of antennae or legs may be present), or dead (completely immobile even after prodding). After evaluating insect mortality on grain on day 14, adults were removed from the vials, and commodity was kept for 65 d to assess progeny production.</p>",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "teenox_rw_lagb_concrete_assay_agdata_commons.csv",
+ "teenox_rw_lagb_grain_assay_agdata_commons.csv",
+ "progenyteenoxcombined.csv"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/20d1c814-a6cc-4a90-a118-d40438640561",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/20d1c814-a6cc-4a90-a118-d40438640561/raw",
+ "has_download": true,
+ "has_spatial": true,
+ "identifier": "10.15482/USDA.ADC/33318054.v1",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Azamethiphos",
+ "European Union",
+ "Greece",
+ "Prostephanus truncatus",
+ "Sitophilus oryzae",
+ "University of Thessaly",
+ "bulk storage",
+ "concrete",
+ "crack-and-crevice",
+ "exposure assay",
+ "food facilities",
+ "grain",
+ "grain protectant",
+ "insecticides",
+ "laboratory",
+ "larger grain borer",
+ "maize",
+ "organophosphate",
+ "processing",
+ "rice weevil",
+ "stored product insects",
+ "stored products",
+ "wheat"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-09-30T21:32:35.667372",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "352b4532-793d-4075-a03f-05b778a3c43a",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/usda.png",
+ "name": "Department of Agriculture",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "usda"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 0,
+ "publisher": "Agricultural Research Service",
+ "slug": "data-from-a-new-organophosphate-in-stored-product-protection-efficacy-of-azamethiphos-for-",
+ "spatial_centroid": {
+ "lat": 39.393638539142074,
+ "lon": 22.94084880702261
+ },
+ "spatial_shape": {
+ "coordinates": [
+ 22.94084880702261,
+ 39.393638539142074
+ ],
+ "type": "Point"
+ },
+ "theme": [],
+ "title": "Data from: A new organophosphate in stored-product protection? Efficacy of azamethiphos for the control of <i>Sitophilus oryzae </i>(L.) and<i> Prostephanus truncatus</i> (Horn)",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 68.67946,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790803955484,
+ 68.67946,
+ 0,
+ "b6c5d6d6-15b9-4b5d-9be3-a9b7382ad8fc"
+ ],
+ "dcat": {
+ "@type": "dcat:Dataset",
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "005:18",
+ "005:20"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "fn": "Smart, Brian, C.",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:brian.smart@ndsu.edu"
+ },
+ "description": "<p dir=\"ltr\">Code accompanying the manuscript \"The stability of fatty acid composition in sunflower oil is dependent on environment and affected by structural variation\" (Ingold, Hulke et al.), submitted to Theoretical and Applied Genetics.</p><p dir=\"ltr\">The code implements a genome-wide association study of seed fatty acid composition and its stability in the sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) association mapping (SAM) population of 287 varieties, grown in eight field trials across North America: Vancouver, British Columbia (2010); Moorhead, Minnesota (2015, early and late plantings 2016); Ames, Iowa (2010, 2013, 2014); and Athens, Georgia (2010). Palmitic, stearic, oleic, and linoleic acid were measured by gas chromatography.</p><p dir=\"ltr\">Multivariate GWAS was performed on four phenotype sets: mean fatty acid composition within each environment; the same omitting high oleic varieties; within-environment stability quantified by standard errors among replicate samples (alpha stability); and across-environment stability quantified by Eberhart and Russell's beta.</p><p dir=\"ltr\">Included are scripts for phenotype preparation, beta stability regression, CHELSA climate data extraction and correlation, genotype and kinship analysis (ADMIXTURE, VanRaden kinship, PCA, LD blocks), multivariate GWAS with GEMMA and univariate GWAS with vcf2gwas, post-GWAS candidate gene identification, and analysis of a chromosome 5 introgression associated with stability under hot, humid conditions.</p><p dir=\"ltr\">The code is archived at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22001495 and developed at https://github.com/BrianSmart/SunflowerFattyAcidStabilityGWAS. SNP genotypes are third-party and available from HelianthOME (http://www.helianthome.org/download/#genotype).</p>",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://geodata.nal.usda.gov/geonetwork/srv/api/records/e5eb6950-5358-45a0-b524-41b33ce2b954/formatters/xml",
+ "conformsTo": "https://www.isotc211.org/2005/gmd",
+ "format": "xml",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "Geodata ISO 19139 metadata"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22001495",
+ "mediaType": "text/html",
+ "title": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22001495"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "10.5281/zenodo.22001495",
+ "keyword": [
+ "GWAS",
+ "Helianthus annus L.",
+ "association mapping",
+ "fatty acid composition",
+ "genotype by environment (G×E) interaction",
+ "linoleic acid",
+ "oleic acid",
+ "seed oil quality",
+ "source code",
+ "structural variation",
+ "sunflower",
+ "trait stability"
+ ],
+ "license": "https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/",
+ "modified": "2026-08-28",
+ "programCode": [
+ "005:040"
+ ],
+ "publisher": {
+ "@type": "org:Organization",
+ "name": "Agricultural Research Service"
+ },
+ "spatial": "{\"type\": \"MultiPoint\", \"coordinates\": [[-123.1207, 49.2827], [-96.7678, 46.8738], [-93.6199, 42.0347], [-83.3576, 33.9519]]}",
+ "temporal": "2010-01-01/2016-12-31",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Code for: The stability of fatty acid composition in sunflower oil is dependent on environment and affected by structural variation"
+ },
+ "description": "<p dir=\"ltr\">Code accompanying the manuscript \"The stability of fatty acid composition in sunflower oil is dependent on environment and affected by structural variation\" (Ingold, Hulke et al.), submitted to Theoretical and Applied Genetics.</p><p dir=\"ltr\">The code implements a genome-wide association study of seed fatty acid composition and its stability in the sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) association mapping (SAM) population of 287 varieties, grown in eight field trials across North America: Vancouver, British Columbia (2010); Moorhead, Minnesota (2015, early and late plantings 2016); Ames, Iowa (2010, 2013, 2014); and Athens, Georgia (2010). Palmitic, stearic, oleic, and linoleic acid were measured by gas chromatography.</p><p dir=\"ltr\">Multivariate GWAS was performed on four phenotype sets: mean fatty acid composition within each environment; the same omitting high oleic varieties; within-environment stability quantified by standard errors among replicate samples (alpha stability); and across-environment stability quantified by Eberhart and Russell's beta.</p><p dir=\"ltr\">Included are scripts for phenotype preparation, beta stability regression, CHELSA climate data extraction and correlation, genotype and kinship analysis (ADMIXTURE, VanRaden kinship, PCA, LD blocks), multivariate GWAS with GEMMA and univariate GWAS with vcf2gwas, post-GWAS candidate gene identification, and analysis of a chromosome 5 introgression associated with stability under hot, humid conditions.</p><p dir=\"ltr\">The code is archived at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22001495 and developed at https://github.com/BrianSmart/SunflowerFattyAcidStabilityGWAS. SNP genotypes are third-party and available from HelianthOME (http://www.helianthome.org/download/#genotype).</p>",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "Geodata ISO 19139 metadata",
+ "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22001495"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/cf2c9546-b9bc-42b3-abdb-ec61759cf271",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/cf2c9546-b9bc-42b3-abdb-ec61759cf271/raw",
+ "has_download": true,
+ "has_spatial": true,
+ "identifier": "10.5281/zenodo.22001495",
+ "keyword": [
+ "GWAS",
+ "Helianthus annus L.",
+ "association mapping",
+ "fatty acid composition",
+ "genotype by environment (G×E) interaction",
+ "linoleic acid",
+ "oleic acid",
+ "seed oil quality",
+ "source code",
+ "structural variation",
+ "sunflower",
+ "trait stability"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-09-30T21:32:35.484474",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "352b4532-793d-4075-a03f-05b778a3c43a",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/usda.png",
+ "name": "Department of Agriculture",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "usda"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 0,
+ "publisher": "Agricultural Research Service",
+ "slug": "code-for-the-stability-of-fatty-acid-composition-in-sunflower-oil-is-dependent-on-environm",
+ "spatial_centroid": {
+ "lat": 43.035775,
+ "lon": -99.2165
+ },
+ "spatial_shape": {
+ "coordinates": [
+ [
+ -123.1207,
+ 49.2827
+ ],
+ [
+ -96.7678,
+ 46.8738
+ ],
+ [
+ -93.6199,
+ 42.0347
+ ],
+ [
+ -83.3576,
+ 33.9519
+ ]
+ ],
+ "type": "MultiPoint"
+ },
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Code for: The stability of fatty acid composition in sunflower oil is dependent on environment and affected by structural variation",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 2.737566,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790803950747,
+ 2.737566,
+ 2,
+ "3c29b8a0-90c6-4200-a9b4-328d305fdc30"
+ ],
+ "dcat": {
+ "@type": "dcat:Dataset",
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "accrualPeriodicity": "irregular",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "005:18"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "fn": "Morrison, William R.",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:william.morrison@usda.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "<p dir=\"ltr\">[NOTE: 2026-07-31: Data files added, see README file for descriptions]</p><p dir=\"ltr\"><br></p><p dir=\"ltr\"><i>Trapping in 2023 with a linear set of dosages of </i>(E)<i>-8-dodecenyl acetate</i></p><p dir=\"ltr\">Field trapping was done according to the methodology in Ruiz et al. 2022. The fields were located in North-Central Kansas at the Land Institute near Salina, KS. No pesticides were applied to these fields during the experiment in 2023. Starting the first week of June, six transects were set out, two in each <i>Silphium integrifolium </i>field. Each transect contained seven 30.4 cm x 30.4 cm sticky card traps (Alpha Scents, Canby, OR, USA) affixed to the top of a 1.27 cm diameter, three foot in length PVC pole that was hammered into the ground until sturdy. The cards were affixed using a 271 cm long sticky card ring holder (Olson Products Inc., Medina, OH, USA) that was bent to a 90° angle and placed inside the PVC pipe. Two large binder clips were also used to anchor the sticky card to its card holder.</p><p dir=\"ltr\">The sticky traps in each transect were spaced 10 meters apart around the perimeter of the field. Within each transect, traps were baited with a linear increase in concentrations in 2023, including either a control (50 µl of acetone), a low concentration (50 µl of a solution made by mixing 5.75 µl of (<i>E</i>)-8-dodecenyl acetate in 5 ml of acetone), or a doubled concentration (11.5 µl of (<i>E</i>)-8-dodecenyl acetate diluted in 5 ml of acetone) of (<i>E</i>)-8-dodecenyl acetate (Alfa Chemistry, Ronkonkoma, NY, USA). All lures were added to a 3-ml LDPE dropping bottle (Wheaton, DWK Life Sciences, Millville, NJ, USA). The clear sticky card traps were collected and replaced biweekly until the first <i>E. giganteana </i>adult was caught, then traps were changed weekly. The lures and control bottles were replaced once every two weeks (with lure emissions confirmed out to 14 d in Ruiz et al. 2022) and their position in the field rotated at each change. Each lure was in each position twice over the course of the season.</p><p dir=\"ltr\">When collected, the sticky cards were held in a 7.6 L (=2 gal) labeled Ziploc<sup>©</sup> bag transported back to USDA-ARS. All collected sticky traps were placed in a freezer for approximately 24 h. The total number of <i>E. giganteana</i> per trap and their distance from the lure in millimeters was recorded. In addition, the number of nontarget lepidoptera was recorded on each trap. Individual <i>E. giganteana </i>and non-target lepidoptera were only counted if more than half of the specimen was remaining on the sticky trap at the time of counting to ensure positive identification.</p><p dir=\"ltr\"><i>Trapping in 2024 with an exponential set of concentrations of </i>(E)<i>-8-dodecenyl acetate</i></p><p dir=\"ltr\">Field trapping in 2024 was conducted similarly to that in 2023 with the following modifications. Three different fields located at the Land Institute were used (<a href=\"\" target=\"_blank\">Table 1). </a><a href=\"#_msocom_1\" target=\"_blank\">[HS1]</a> Pesticides were applied once to one of the fields and adjacent to one of the others. Three transects were deployed in each of the three fields. Each transect contained four traps for a total of 36 traps. The traps were assembled similarly to those used in 2023, but a hand-made sticky card was used instead of a manufactured one to improve captures. These sticky cards were made of a laminated 21.6 × 27.9 cm (=8.5 by 11 in) piece of white cardstock paper (Astrobright, Neenah, WI, USA) coated on both sides with TAD<sup>Ⓡ</sup> all-weather adhesive (Trécé Adhesives Division, Adair, OK, USA). The sticky sides were covered with wax paper for ease of travel. Additionally, the sticky cards had a chicken wire cage placed over them in the field to try to prevent the capture of birds and other nontargets on the traps. Traps in 2024 were baited with an exponential set of concentrations of (<i>E</i>)-8-dodecenyl acetate. In each transect, there was a solvent only control (50 µl of acetone), a low concentration equivalent to the 2023 treatment (50 µl of a solution made of 5.75 µl of (<i>E</i>)-8-dodecenyl acetate diluted in 5 ml of acetone), a medium concentration (50 µl of a solution made of 78.5 µl of (<i>E</i>)-8-dodecenyl acetate diluted in 5 ml of acetone), and a high concentration (50 µl of a solution made of 580.4 µl of (<i>E</i>)-8-dodecenyl acetate diluted in 5 ml of acetone). The traps were replaced weekly, and the lures were replaced biweekly, as well as rotated positions in the transect. Each lure was in each position twice over the course of the season.</p><p dir=\"ltr\"><i>Eucosma giganteana and Silphium integrifolium collections from the field</i></p><p dir=\"ltr\"><i>Eucosma giganteana</i> cannot yet be reared successfully in the laboratory, thus we sourced all specimens from the field. Adult <i>E. giganteana </i>individuals were carefully captured by hand in one of the fields planted to <i>Silphium integrifolium</i> at the Land Institute (38.769622, -97.598576) between 22:00 and 24:00 five times a week from June to August 2024. Moths were immediately sexed and individually placed in small deli cups with appropriate labels. They were brought back to the USDA-ARS Center for Grain and Animal Health (39.1955486, -96.5987334) for the experiments described below. Once in the lab but prior to use in experiments, moths were kept in a quiet environment at approximately 23 ± 0.1℃ and 16:8 L:D photoperiod. Importantly, no lures were used to capture insects to avoid biasing the results of the experiments below. <i>Silphium integrifolium</i> flower heads were cut 1 cm below the flower and brought back on a weekly basis during the same timeframe and stored at 4°C until needed for experiments. Flower heads were never more than 4 days old prior to use.</p><p><br></p><p dir=\"ltr\"><i>Headspace Characterization</i></p><p dir=\"ltr\">Headspace was collected from the following treatments: 10 <i>E. giganteana</i> male moths only, 10 <i>E. giganteana</i> female moths only, an even mix of male and female moths (5:5), flower cuttings of <i>S. integrifolium</i>, and a blank control. For the <i>E. giganteana</i> treatments, only alive, healthy adult moths that were collected within five days were used. For the <i>S. integrifolium </i>collections, approximately 25 grams of flower heads cut the same week as collections were used.</p><p dir=\"ltr\">For each treatment, <i>E. giganteana</i> or <i>S. integrifolium</i> were placed in a clean 100-mL beaker. To prevent moth escapees, a metal mesh top was constructed and affixed to the opening of the beaker. The beaker was then placed in one of eight 500-mL glass headspace collection containers with a PTFE septum and lid. A Pora-Pak Q volatile collection trap (VCT) was inserted in the output end. The VCT consisted of an angled drip-tip collection point borosilicate glass tube with a mesh (Stainless Steel #316 screen), packed with 20 mg of PoraPak-Q™ chemical absorbent held in place with a borosilicate glass wool plug, and followed by a PTFE Teflon™ compression seal. A PTFE tube spanned from the flow meter (CADS-4CPP, Clean Air Delivery System, Sigma Scientific, LLC, Micanopy, FL, USA) to the input end of the headspace container at a flow rate of 1 L/min. Prior to that, the air was scrubbed with an activated carbon filter and was pumped in using the central air pump for the center. Samples ran for 24 h. Each volatile collection trap was collected and eluted with 150 µl of dichloromethane in a fume hood into a 2-mL GC vial containing a 250 µl glass insert with polymer feet. The solvent was gently pushed through the volatile collection trap with N<sub>2</sub> gas. At the end of collecting all the samples, 1 µl of an internal standard, tetradecane (190.5 ng), was added to each of the samples. The samples were then all capped with a magnetic screw top lid and secured with PTFE tape before being placed in a freezer at -20 ℃ until they could be run. All headspace samples were collected within 5 weeks. After each replication, the headspace collection containers were all washed with methanol and then hexane. VCTs were rinsed in triplicate with dichloromethane. A total of at least n = 5 replicates were tested for each treatment.</p><p><br></p><p dir=\"ltr\"><i>Gas Chromatography Coupled with Mass Spectrometry</i></p><p dir=\"ltr\">All headspace collection sample extracts were run on an Agilent 7890B gas chromatograph (GC) equipped with an Agilent Durabond HP-5 column (30 m length, 0.250 mm diameter and 0.25 μm film thickness) with He as the carrier gas at a constant 1.2 mL/min flow and 40 cm/s velocity. The GC was coupled with a single-quadrupole Agilent 5997B mass spectrometer (MS). The compounds were separated by auto-injecting 1 μl of each sample under splitless into the GC–MS at room temperature (approximately 23 °C). The flow rate was 18 ml/min. The GC program consisted of 40 °C for 1 min followed by 10 °C/min increases to 300 °C and then held for 26.5 min. After a solvent delay of 3 min, mass ranges between 50 and 550 atomic mass units were scanned. Compounds were tentatively identified by comparison of spectral data with those from the NIST 14 library and by GC retention index. The samples were normalized according to the following formula: (Pk<sub>sam</sub> – Pk<sub>min</sub>)/(Pk<sub>max</sub> – Pk<sub>min</sub>), where Pk<sub>sam</sub> is the peak area from the sample, Pk<sub>min </sub>is the global minimum peak area, and Pk<sub>max</sub> is the global max peak area.</p><p><br></p><p dir=\"ltr\"><i>Electroantennography of E. giganteana</i></p><p dir=\"ltr\">All<i> </i>electroantennogram (EAG) recordings of <i>E. giganteana</i> were taken from 19:00 to 23:00 which corresponded to the peak activity period of <i>E. giganteana</i> based on prior literature (Ruiz et al. 2022). Prior to recordings, the machine and software were powered on and given 30 min to warm up. Only field-captured moths within ...",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/51279737",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "scribner_headspace_volatiles_eucosma_2024.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/51279740",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "Eucosma_EAD .csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/51279743",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "Combined flight mill data1.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/51279749",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "Trapping_combined2024.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/66814319",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "beta_myrcene_NIST_mass_spectra.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/66814322",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "beta_myrcene_silphium_sample.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/66814325",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "beta_myrcene_std_sample.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/66814328",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "beta_phellandrene_NIST_mass_spectra.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/66814331",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "beta_phellandrene_sample_silphium.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/66814334",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "beta_phellandrene_std_sample.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/66814337",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "beta_pinene_NIST_extracted_mass_spectrum.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/66814340",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "beta_pinene_sample_silphium.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/66814343",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "beta_pinene_std_sample.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/66814346",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "camphene_in_silphium_sample_mass_spectrum.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/66814349",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "camphene_NIST_mass_spectra.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/66814352",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "camphene_standard_sample.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/66814355",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "D_limonene_NIST_mass_spectra.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/66814358",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "D_limonene_silphium_sample.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/66814361",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "D_limonene_std_sample.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/66814364",
+ "format": "R",
+ "mediaType": "text/plain",
+ "title": "Hazel Amalgamated Script.R"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/66814367",
+ "format": "docx",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document",
+ "title": "README Scribner et al.docx"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "10.15482/USDA.ADC/28055111.v2",
+ "keyword": [
+ "ars",
+ "attract-and-kill",
+ "behavior",
+ "behavioral ecology",
+ "behaviorally-based management",
+ "cgahr",
+ "cup plant",
+ "eag",
+ "eucosma giganteana",
+ "flight mill",
+ "giant eucosma moth",
+ "insect behavior",
+ "insect flight",
+ "integrated pest management",
+ "kansas",
+ "lepidoptera",
+ "manhattan, ks",
+ "mating disruption",
+ "monitoring",
+ "pest",
+ "physiology",
+ "prairie",
+ "semiochemicals",
+ "silphium",
+ "silphium integrifolium",
+ "the land institute",
+ "tortricidae",
+ "trapping",
+ "usda"
+ ],
+ "license": "https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/",
+ "modified": "2026-07-31",
+ "programCode": [
+ "005:040"
+ ],
+ "publisher": {
+ "@type": "org:Organization",
+ "name": "Agricultural Research Service"
+ },
+ "temporal": "2023-05-01/2024-10-01",
+ "title": "Data from: Behavioral and physiological response of <i>Eucosma giganteana </i>to semiochemicals from conspecifics and <i>Silphium integrifolium</i>"
+ },
+ "description": "<p dir=\"ltr\">[NOTE: 2026-07-31: Data files added, see README file for descriptions]</p><p dir=\"ltr\"><br></p><p dir=\"ltr\"><i>Trapping in 2023 with a linear set of dosages of </i>(E)<i>-8-dodecenyl acetate</i></p><p dir=\"ltr\">Field trapping was done according to the methodology in Ruiz et al. 2022. The fields were located in North-Central Kansas at the Land Institute near Salina, KS. No pesticides were applied to these fields during the experiment in 2023. Starting the first week of June, six transects were set out, two in each <i>Silphium integrifolium </i>field. Each transect contained seven 30.4 cm x 30.4 cm sticky card traps (Alpha Scents, Canby, OR, USA) affixed to the top of a 1.27 cm diameter, three foot in length PVC pole that was hammered into the ground until sturdy. The cards were affixed using a 271 cm long sticky card ring holder (Olson Products Inc., Medina, OH, USA) that was bent to a 90° angle and placed inside the PVC pipe. Two large binder clips were also used to anchor the sticky card to its card holder.</p><p dir=\"ltr\">The sticky traps in each transect were spaced 10 meters apart around the perimeter of the field. Within each transect, traps were baited with a linear increase in concentrations in 2023, including either a control (50 µl of acetone), a low concentration (50 µl of a solution made by mixing 5.75 µl of (<i>E</i>)-8-dodecenyl acetate in 5 ml of acetone), or a doubled concentration (11.5 µl of (<i>E</i>)-8-dodecenyl acetate diluted in 5 ml of acetone) of (<i>E</i>)-8-dodecenyl acetate (Alfa Chemistry, Ronkonkoma, NY, USA). All lures were added to a 3-ml LDPE dropping bottle (Wheaton, DWK Life Sciences, Millville, NJ, USA). The clear sticky card traps were collected and replaced biweekly until the first <i>E. giganteana </i>adult was caught, then traps were changed weekly. The lures and control bottles were replaced once every two weeks (with lure emissions confirmed out to 14 d in Ruiz et al. 2022) and their position in the field rotated at each change. Each lure was in each position twice over the course of the season.</p><p dir=\"ltr\">When collected, the sticky cards were held in a 7.6 L (=2 gal) labeled Ziploc<sup>©</sup> bag transported back to USDA-ARS. All collected sticky traps were placed in a freezer for approximately 24 h. The total number of <i>E. giganteana</i> per trap and their distance from the lure in millimeters was recorded. In addition, the number of nontarget lepidoptera was recorded on each trap. Individual <i>E. giganteana </i>and non-target lepidoptera were only counted if more than half of the specimen was remaining on the sticky trap at the time of counting to ensure positive identification.</p><p dir=\"ltr\"><i>Trapping in 2024 with an exponential set of concentrations of </i>(E)<i>-8-dodecenyl acetate</i></p><p dir=\"ltr\">Field trapping in 2024 was conducted similarly to that in 2023 with the following modifications. Three different fields located at the Land Institute were used (<a href=\"\" target=\"_blank\">Table 1). </a><a href=\"#_msocom_1\" target=\"_blank\">[HS1]</a> Pesticides were applied once to one of the fields and adjacent to one of the others. Three transects were deployed in each of the three fields. Each transect contained four traps for a total of 36 traps. The traps were assembled similarly to those used in 2023, but a hand-made sticky card was used instead of a manufactured one to improve captures. These sticky cards were made of a laminated 21.6 × 27.9 cm (=8.5 by 11 in) piece of white cardstock paper (Astrobright, Neenah, WI, USA) coated on both sides with TAD<sup>Ⓡ</sup> all-weather adhesive (Trécé Adhesives Division, Adair, OK, USA). The sticky sides were covered with wax paper for ease of travel. Additionally, the sticky cards had a chicken wire cage placed over them in the field to try to prevent the capture of birds and other nontargets on the traps. Traps in 2024 were baited with an exponential set of concentrations of (<i>E</i>)-8-dodecenyl acetate. In each transect, there was a solvent only control (50 µl of acetone), a low concentration equivalent to the 2023 treatment (50 µl of a solution made of 5.75 µl of (<i>E</i>)-8-dodecenyl acetate diluted in 5 ml of acetone), a medium concentration (50 µl of a solution made of 78.5 µl of (<i>E</i>)-8-dodecenyl acetate diluted in 5 ml of acetone), and a high concentration (50 µl of a solution made of 580.4 µl of (<i>E</i>)-8-dodecenyl acetate diluted in 5 ml of acetone). The traps were replaced weekly, and the lures were replaced biweekly, as well as rotated positions in the transect. Each lure was in each position twice over the course of the season.</p><p dir=\"ltr\"><i>Eucosma giganteana and Silphium integrifolium collections from the field</i></p><p dir=\"ltr\"><i>Eucosma giganteana</i> cannot yet be reared successfully in the laboratory, thus we sourced all specimens from the field. Adult <i>E. giganteana </i>individuals were carefully captured by hand in one of the fields planted to <i>Silphium integrifolium</i> at the Land Institute (38.769622, -97.598576) between 22:00 and 24:00 five times a week from June to August 2024. Moths were immediately sexed and individually placed in small deli cups with appropriate labels. They were brought back to the USDA-ARS Center for Grain and Animal Health (39.1955486, -96.5987334) for the experiments described below. Once in the lab but prior to use in experiments, moths were kept in a quiet environment at approximately 23 ± 0.1℃ and 16:8 L:D photoperiod. Importantly, no lures were used to capture insects to avoid biasing the results of the experiments below. <i>Silphium integrifolium</i> flower heads were cut 1 cm below the flower and brought back on a weekly basis during the same timeframe and stored at 4°C until needed for experiments. Flower heads were never more than 4 days old prior to use.</p><p><br></p><p dir=\"ltr\"><i>Headspace Characterization</i></p><p dir=\"ltr\">Headspace was collected from the following treatments: 10 <i>E. giganteana</i> male moths only, 10 <i>E. giganteana</i> female moths only, an even mix of male and female moths (5:5), flower cuttings of <i>S. integrifolium</i>, and a blank control. For the <i>E. giganteana</i> treatments, only alive, healthy adult moths that were collected within five days were used. For the <i>S. integrifolium </i>collections, approximately 25 grams of flower heads cut the same week as collections were used.</p><p dir=\"ltr\">For each treatment, <i>E. giganteana</i> or <i>S. integrifolium</i> were placed in a clean 100-mL beaker. To prevent moth escapees, a metal mesh top was constructed and affixed to the opening of the beaker. The beaker was then placed in one of eight 500-mL glass headspace collection containers with a PTFE septum and lid. A Pora-Pak Q volatile collection trap (VCT) was inserted in the output end. The VCT consisted of an angled drip-tip collection point borosilicate glass tube with a mesh (Stainless Steel #316 screen), packed with 20 mg of PoraPak-Q™ chemical absorbent held in place with a borosilicate glass wool plug, and followed by a PTFE Teflon™ compression seal. A PTFE tube spanned from the flow meter (CADS-4CPP, Clean Air Delivery System, Sigma Scientific, LLC, Micanopy, FL, USA) to the input end of the headspace container at a flow rate of 1 L/min. Prior to that, the air was scrubbed with an activated carbon filter and was pumped in using the central air pump for the center. Samples ran for 24 h. Each volatile collection trap was collected and eluted with 150 µl of dichloromethane in a fume hood into a 2-mL GC vial containing a 250 µl glass insert with polymer feet. The solvent was gently pushed through the volatile collection trap with N<sub>2</sub> gas. At the end of collecting all the samples, 1 µl of an internal standard, tetradecane (190.5 ng), was added to each of the samples. The samples were then all capped with a magnetic screw top lid and secured with PTFE tape before being placed in a freezer at -20 ℃ until they could be run. All headspace samples were collected within 5 weeks. After each replication, the headspace collection containers were all washed with methanol and then hexane. VCTs were rinsed in triplicate with dichloromethane. A total of at least n = 5 replicates were tested for each treatment.</p><p><br></p><p dir=\"ltr\"><i>Gas Chromatography Coupled with Mass Spectrometry</i></p><p dir=\"ltr\">All headspace collection sample extracts were run on an Agilent 7890B gas chromatograph (GC) equipped with an Agilent Durabond HP-5 column (30 m length, 0.250 mm diameter and 0.25 μm film thickness) with He as the carrier gas at a constant 1.2 mL/min flow and 40 cm/s velocity. The GC was coupled with a single-quadrupole Agilent 5997B mass spectrometer (MS). The compounds were separated by auto-injecting 1 μl of each sample under splitless into the GC–MS at room temperature (approximately 23 °C). The flow rate was 18 ml/min. The GC program consisted of 40 °C for 1 min followed by 10 °C/min increases to 300 °C and then held for 26.5 min. After a solvent delay of 3 min, mass ranges between 50 and 550 atomic mass units were scanned. Compounds were tentatively identified by comparison of spectral data with those from the NIST 14 library and by GC retention index. The samples were normalized according to the following formula: (Pk<sub>sam</sub> – Pk<sub>min</sub>)/(Pk<sub>max</sub> – Pk<sub>min</sub>), where Pk<sub>sam</sub> is the peak area from the sample, Pk<sub>min </sub>is the global minimum peak area, and Pk<sub>max</sub> is the global max peak area.</p><p><br></p><p dir=\"ltr\"><i>Electroantennography of E. giganteana</i></p><p dir=\"ltr\">All<i> </i>electroantennogram (EAG) recordings of <i>E. giganteana</i> were taken from 19:00 to 23:00 which corresponded to the peak activity period of <i>E. giganteana</i> based on prior literature (Ruiz et al. 2022). Prior to recordings, the machine and software were powered on and given 30 min to warm up. Only field-captured moths within ...",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "scribner_headspace_volatiles_eucosma_2024.csv",
+ "Eucosma_EAD .csv",
+ "Combined flight mill data1.csv",
+ "Trapping_combined2024.csv",
+ "beta_myrcene_NIST_mass_spectra.csv",
+ "beta_myrcene_silphium_sample.csv",
+ "beta_myrcene_std_sample.csv",
+ "beta_phellandrene_NIST_mass_spectra.csv",
+ "beta_phellandrene_sample_silphium.csv",
+ "beta_phellandrene_std_sample.csv",
+ "beta_pinene_NIST_extracted_mass_spectrum.csv",
+ "beta_pinene_sample_silphium.csv",
+ "beta_pinene_std_sample.csv",
+ "camphene_in_silphium_sample_mass_spectrum.csv",
+ "camphene_NIST_mass_spectra.csv",
+ "camphene_standard_sample.csv",
+ "D_limonene_NIST_mass_spectra.csv",
+ "D_limonene_silphium_sample.csv",
+ "D_limonene_std_sample.csv",
+ "Hazel Amalgamated Script.R",
+ "README Scribner et al.docx"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/4194b55a-32ce-4785-8de6-4ea832ad9600",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/4194b55a-32ce-4785-8de6-4ea832ad9600/raw",
+ "has_download": true,
+ "has_spatial": false,
+ "identifier": "10.15482/USDA.ADC/28055111.v2",
+ "keyword": [
+ "ars",
+ "attract-and-kill",
+ "behavior",
+ "behavioral ecology",
+ "behaviorally-based management",
+ "cgahr",
+ "cup plant",
+ "eag",
+ "eucosma giganteana",
+ "flight mill",
+ "giant eucosma moth",
+ "insect behavior",
+ "insect flight",
+ "integrated pest management",
+ "kansas",
+ "lepidoptera",
+ "manhattan, ks",
+ "mating disruption",
+ "monitoring",
+ "pest",
+ "physiology",
+ "prairie",
+ "semiochemicals",
+ "silphium",
+ "silphium integrifolium",
+ "the land institute",
+ "tortricidae",
+ "trapping",
+ "usda"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-09-30T21:32:30.747498",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "352b4532-793d-4075-a03f-05b778a3c43a",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/usda.png",
+ "name": "Department of Agriculture",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "usda"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 2,
+ "publisher": "Agricultural Research Service",
+ "slug": "data-from-behavioral-and-physiological-response-of-ieucosma-giganteana-ito-semiochemicals-",
  "spatial_centroid": null,
  "spatial_shape": null,
  "theme": [],
- "title": "Community Planning and Development (CPD) Appropriations Budget & Allocations",
+ "title": "Data from: Behavioral and physiological response of <i>Eucosma giganteana </i>to semiochemicals from conspecifics and <i>Silphium integrifolium</i>",
  "type": "dataset"
  },
  {
- "_score": 10.425358,
+ "_score": 54.310665,
  "_sort": [
- 1790735208781,
- 10.425358,
+ 1790803890126,
+ 54.310665,
  2,
- "3e06019b-49df-4465-826b-e2cdfd526c08"
+ "627746d6-1a5f-43bc-8933-06d33a7bf3b5"
+ ],
+ "dcat": {
+ "@type": "dcat:Dataset",
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "005:18"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "fn": "McGranahan, Devan, A.",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:Devan.McGranahan@usda.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "<p dir=\"ltr\"><b>Overview</b></p><p dir=\"ltr\">Fire increasingly conflicts with the built environment. The Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) describes areas where vegetation near the built environment increases wildfire hazard. In the United States, attention concentrates on WUI in forested areas, but human populations are extending into rangelands. The combination of WUI expansion and woody plant encroachment might present novel challenges to wildfire management, especially given the rural nature of rangelands in the US, which extends the response time of emergency services. We use publicly available data to describe the abundance, distribution, type, and overall wildfire risk in rural rangelands. Most of the WUI in the US Interior West (54%) occurs in rangeland: The majority of the US Interior West is rangeland and 4.3% of that—over 1 million km<sup>2</sup> —is WUI. Most WUI is rural: 59% is further than 10 km from town and Tribal areas are even more remote. Rangeland WUI is approximately twice as likely to be degraded by woody encroachment than non-WUI rangeland, suggesting that conventional fire suppression tactics for rangeland fuels might be insufficient or unsafe. Greater awareness of rural rangeland WUI might help leverage community-level adaptive capacity against the novel challenges of protecting lives and property beyond urban/peri-urban zones.</p><p dir=\"ltr\"><b>Files included</b></p><p dir=\"ltr\">These files include summarized data and R script used to create the analysis described above.</p>",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://geodata.nal.usda.gov/geonetwork/srv/api/records/352219db-1cf6-4bc8-b31e-3c5c95414983/formatters/xml",
+ "conformsTo": "https://www.isotc211.org/2005/gmd",
+ "format": "xml",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "Geodata ISO 19139 metadata"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/50799297",
+ "format": "xlsx",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet",
+ "title": "RangeWUI.xlsx"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/50799306",
+ "format": "zip",
+ "mediaType": "application/zip",
+ "title": "Robjects.zip"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/50799426",
+ "format": "pdf",
+ "mediaType": "application/pdf",
+ "title": "Rscript.pdf"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/54073649",
+ "format": "pdf",
+ "mediaType": "application/pdf",
+ "title": "EnergyWUI_StateCountyTables.pdf"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "10.15482/USDA.ADC/27905196.v2",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Landscape ecology",
+ "Rural capacity",
+ "Wildfire risk",
+ "Wildland-Urban Interface"
+ ],
+ "license": "https://www.usa.gov/publicdomain/label/1.0/",
+ "modified": "2026-08-24",
+ "programCode": [
+ "005:040"
+ ],
+ "publisher": {
+ "@type": "org:Organization",
+ "name": "Agricultural Research Service"
+ },
+ "spatial": "{\"type\": \"Polygon\", \"coordinates\": [[[-117.22282269144286, 48.951361163538735], [-116.72517991655339, 42.02391635277718], [-120.1729664255404, 42.020697055191334], [-120.01696456111064, 38.967836981509066], [-114.54306862581659, 34.85660167488804], [-114.6832958730517, 32.514550114224704], [-111.06066874853424, 31.322607705912148], [-109.03213360311572, 31.33480834546434], [-108.25891017714905, 31.355888352732066], [-108.24639534112985, 31.7754135525075], [-106.59884725403272, 31.772683839469508], [-103.06316071625766, 31.807185365994997], [-103.04044212432733, 36.88545053812453], [-102.05384882184559, 36.88822301139487], [-102.08372027968149, 40.79801610463937], [-104.06685608300286, 40.96452680481593], [-103.99076822453019, 48.917372469700894], [-117.22282269144286, 48.951361163538735]]]}",
+ "temporal": "2020-01-01/2024-10-31",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Data from: Quantifying wildfire risk to the built environment in rangelands of the US Interior West"
+ },
+ "description": "<p dir=\"ltr\"><b>Overview</b></p><p dir=\"ltr\">Fire increasingly conflicts with the built environment. The Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) describes areas where vegetation near the built environment increases wildfire hazard. In the United States, attention concentrates on WUI in forested areas, but human populations are extending into rangelands. The combination of WUI expansion and woody plant encroachment might present novel challenges to wildfire management, especially given the rural nature of rangelands in the US, which extends the response time of emergency services. We use publicly available data to describe the abundance, distribution, type, and overall wildfire risk in rural rangelands. Most of the WUI in the US Interior West (54%) occurs in rangeland: The majority of the US Interior West is rangeland and 4.3% of that—over 1 million km<sup>2</sup> —is WUI. Most WUI is rural: 59% is further than 10 km from town and Tribal areas are even more remote. Rangeland WUI is approximately twice as likely to be degraded by woody encroachment than non-WUI rangeland, suggesting that conventional fire suppression tactics for rangeland fuels might be insufficient or unsafe. Greater awareness of rural rangeland WUI might help leverage community-level adaptive capacity against the novel challenges of protecting lives and property beyond urban/peri-urban zones.</p><p dir=\"ltr\"><b>Files included</b></p><p dir=\"ltr\">These files include summarized data and R script used to create the analysis described above.</p>",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "Geodata ISO 19139 metadata",
+ "RangeWUI.xlsx",
+ "Robjects.zip",
+ "Rscript.pdf",
+ "EnergyWUI_StateCountyTables.pdf"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/66d49525-4505-4149-809b-326cd19ee7a8",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/66d49525-4505-4149-809b-326cd19ee7a8/raw",
+ "has_download": true,
+ "has_spatial": true,
+ "identifier": "10.15482/USDA.ADC/27905196.v2",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Landscape ecology",
+ "Rural capacity",
+ "Wildfire risk",
+ "Wildland-Urban Interface"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-09-30T21:31:30.126590",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "352b4532-793d-4075-a03f-05b778a3c43a",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/usda.png",
+ "name": "Department of Agriculture",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "usda"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 2,
+ "publisher": "Agricultural Research Service",
+ "slug": "data-from-quantifying-wildfire-risk-to-the-built-environment-in-rangelands-of-the-us-inter",
+ "spatial_centroid": {
+ "lat": 37.89491669980133,
+ "lon": -110.11571511992028
+ },
+ "spatial_shape": {
+ "coordinates": [
+ [
+ [
+ -117.22282269144286,
+ 48.951361163538735
+ ],
+ [
+ -116.72517991655339,
+ 42.02391635277718
+ ],
+ [
+ -120.1729664255404,
+ 42.020697055191334
+ ],
+ [
+ -120.01696456111064,
+ 38.967836981509066
+ ],
+ [
+ -114.54306862581659,
+ 34.85660167488804
+ ],
+ [
+ -114.6832958730517,
+ 32.514550114224704
+ ],
+ [
+ -111.06066874853424,
+ 31.322607705912148
+ ],
+ [
+ -109.03213360311572,
+ 31.33480834546434
+ ],
+ [
+ -108.25891017714905,
+ 31.355888352732066
+ ],
+ [
+ -108.24639534112985,
+ 31.7754135525075
+ ],
+ [
+ -106.59884725403272,
+ 31.772683839469508
+ ],
+ [
+ -103.06316071625766,
+ 31.807185365994997
+ ],
+ [
+ -103.04044212432733,
+ 36.88545053812453
+ ],
+ [
+ -102.05384882184559,
+ 36.88822301139487
+ ],
+ [
+ -102.08372027968149,
+ 40.79801610463937
+ ],
+ [
+ -104.06685608300286,
+ 40.96452680481593
+ ],
+ [
+ -103.99076822453019,
+ 48.917372469700894
+ ],
+ [
+ -117.22282269144286,
+ 48.951361163538735
+ ]
+ ]
+ ],
+ "type": "Polygon"
+ },
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Data from: Quantifying wildfire risk to the built environment in rangelands of the US Interior West",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 28.812572,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790803882039,
+ 28.812572,
+ 5,
+ "0697d063-75bc-4ebc-b9ec-ee9d8e4648a8"
+ ],
+ "dcat": {
+ "@type": "dcat:Dataset",
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "005:18"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "fn": "Read, Quentin D.",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:quentin.read@usda.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "<h2>Summary</h2><p dir=\"ltr\">This dataset includes all raw data (.csv) and R software code (.Rmd notebook and rendered .html output) needed to reproduce the results presented in the associated manuscript. All exploratory data visualizations and tables of statistical model results are included. The associated manuscript presents the results of a feeding trial with four treatments: layer hens were fed a control diet or diets supplemented with high-oleic peanuts, peanut skin, or oleic acid. Response variables were measured over the course of eight weeks. Generalized linear mixed models include fixed effects of treatment, time, and their interaction, and repeated measures error structure where appropriate. Body weight was significantly greater than the control in the peanut skin and whole peanut treatment. Statistically significant effects of treatment were found for other responses, but overall the results suggest little adverse effects of peanut supplementation on layer performance or egg quality.</p><h2>Description of common columns</h2><p dir=\"ltr\">Data sheets include a column titled \"Rep\" indicating either experimental replication or repeated observation within an experimental unit, \"Week\" for time point (week 1-8), \"Pen\" representing an experimental unit within each replication, or group of birds randomly assigned to a treatment, and \"Trmt\" to indicate one of the four treatments: </p><ul><li><b>Con</b>: control diet</li><li><b>HO PN</b>: diet supplemented with 24% high-oleic peanut</li><li><b>PN Skin</b>: diet supplemented with 3% peanut skin</li><li><b>OA</b>: diet supplemented with 2.5% oleic acid</li></ul><h2>Files included</h2><ul><li><b>body_weight.csv</b>: total body weight per pen in kg, number of birds per pen, and mean weight per bird in kg</li><li><b>egg_weight.csv</b>: weights of individual eggs in g</li><li><b>egg_quality.csv</b>: different egg quality measurements, units given in column headings</li><li><b>feed_consumed.csv</b>: total feed consumed per pen in kg</li><li><b>egg_production.csv</b>: counts of number of eggs produced</li><li><b>fatty_acid_profile.csv</b>: fatty acid concentrations, in percentage units</li><li><b>HOPN_hen_feeding_trial_analysis_supplement.Rmd</b>: RMarkdown notebook with R statistical software code</li><li><b>HOPN_hen_feeding_trial_analysis_supplement.html</b>: rendered output of RMarkdown notebook</li></ul><p></p>",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/57481210",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "egg_fatty_acid_profile.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/57481213",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "egg_production.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/57481216",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "egg_quality.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/57481219",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "egg_weight.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/57481222",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "feed_consumed.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/57481225",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "body_weight.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/57481294",
+ "format": "html",
+ "mediaType": "text/html",
+ "title": "HOPN_hen_feeding_trial_analysis_supplement.html"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/57481297",
+ "format": "Rmd",
+ "mediaType": "text/plain",
+ "title": "HOPN_hen_feeding_trial_analysis_supplement.Rmd"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "10.15482/USDA.ADC/30002362.v1",
+ "keyword": [
+ "cage-free housing",
+ "layers",
+ "peanut",
+ "peanut skin",
+ "poultry",
+ "poultry diet",
+ "source code"
+ ],
+ "license": "https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/",
+ "modified": "2026-09-22",
+ "programCode": [
+ "005:040"
+ ],
+ "publisher": {
+ "@type": "org:Organization",
+ "name": "Agricultural Research Service"
+ },
+ "temporal": "2019-06-04/2019-07-30",
+ "title": "Data and code from: Effects of an Unblanched Peanut and/or Peanut Skin Diet on Egg Quality, Egg Lipid Chemistry and Performance of Hens Housed in a Cage-Free Environment"
+ },
+ "description": "<h2>Summary</h2><p dir=\"ltr\">This dataset includes all raw data (.csv) and R software code (.Rmd notebook and rendered .html output) needed to reproduce the results presented in the associated manuscript. All exploratory data visualizations and tables of statistical model results are included. The associated manuscript presents the results of a feeding trial with four treatments: layer hens were fed a control diet or diets supplemented with high-oleic peanuts, peanut skin, or oleic acid. Response variables were measured over the course of eight weeks. Generalized linear mixed models include fixed effects of treatment, time, and their interaction, and repeated measures error structure where appropriate. Body weight was significantly greater than the control in the peanut skin and whole peanut treatment. Statistically significant effects of treatment were found for other responses, but overall the results suggest little adverse effects of peanut supplementation on layer performance or egg quality.</p><h2>Description of common columns</h2><p dir=\"ltr\">Data sheets include a column titled \"Rep\" indicating either experimental replication or repeated observation within an experimental unit, \"Week\" for time point (week 1-8), \"Pen\" representing an experimental unit within each replication, or group of birds randomly assigned to a treatment, and \"Trmt\" to indicate one of the four treatments: </p><ul><li><b>Con</b>: control diet</li><li><b>HO PN</b>: diet supplemented with 24% high-oleic peanut</li><li><b>PN Skin</b>: diet supplemented with 3% peanut skin</li><li><b>OA</b>: diet supplemented with 2.5% oleic acid</li></ul><h2>Files included</h2><ul><li><b>body_weight.csv</b>: total body weight per pen in kg, number of birds per pen, and mean weight per bird in kg</li><li><b>egg_weight.csv</b>: weights of individual eggs in g</li><li><b>egg_quality.csv</b>: different egg quality measurements, units given in column headings</li><li><b>feed_consumed.csv</b>: total feed consumed per pen in kg</li><li><b>egg_production.csv</b>: counts of number of eggs produced</li><li><b>fatty_acid_profile.csv</b>: fatty acid concentrations, in percentage units</li><li><b>HOPN_hen_feeding_trial_analysis_supplement.Rmd</b>: RMarkdown notebook with R statistical software code</li><li><b>HOPN_hen_feeding_trial_analysis_supplement.html</b>: rendered output of RMarkdown notebook</li></ul><p></p>",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "egg_fatty_acid_profile.csv",
+ "egg_production.csv",
+ "egg_quality.csv",
+ "egg_weight.csv",
+ "feed_consumed.csv",
+ "body_weight.csv",
+ "HOPN_hen_feeding_trial_analysis_supplement.html",
+ "HOPN_hen_feeding_trial_analysis_supplement.Rmd"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/5baf5e0b-af7f-4286-87de-c653da4955d3",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/5baf5e0b-af7f-4286-87de-c653da4955d3/raw",
+ "has_download": true,
+ "has_spatial": false,
+ "identifier": "10.15482/USDA.ADC/30002362.v1",
+ "keyword": [
+ "cage-free housing",
+ "layers",
+ "peanut",
+ "peanut skin",
+ "poultry",
+ "poultry diet",
+ "source code"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-09-30T21:31:22.039403",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "352b4532-793d-4075-a03f-05b778a3c43a",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/usda.png",
+ "name": "Department of Agriculture",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "usda"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 5,
+ "publisher": "Agricultural Research Service",
+ "slug": "data-and-code-from-effects-of-an-unblanched-peanut-and-or-peanut-skin-diet-on-egg-quality-",
+ "spatial_centroid": null,
+ "spatial_shape": null,
+ "theme": [],
+ "title": "Data and code from: Effects of an Unblanched Peanut and/or Peanut Skin Diet on Egg Quality, Egg Lipid Chemistry and Performance of Hens Housed in a Cage-Free Environment",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 8.242479,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790803866890,
+ 8.242479,
+ 3,
+ "5b18c886-018c-4f49-b642-5e9aa21e90aa"
+ ],
+ "dcat": {
+ "@type": "dcat:Dataset",
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "005:18"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "fn": "Gerken, Alison R.",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:alison.gerken@usda.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "<p dir=\"ltr\">[Note 2026-08-31: File \"README_Tribolium_Density_MS_ADDENDUM.txt\" was added to dataset.]</p><p dir=\"ltr\">[Note 2026-08-12: Files \"Supplemental Table 1_adult number g larvae.xlsx\", \"Supplemental Table 2_flour loss glm.xlsx\", \"Supplemental Table 3_reproductive output contrasts.csv\", \"Supplemental Table 4_Pairwise_G-Test_DFU_adults.xlsx\", and \"Supplemental Table 5_VOC peak table.csv\" were added to dataset.]</p><p dir=\"ltr\"><i>Tribolium castaneum</i>, the red flour beetle, is a key pest of cereal grains and products that routinely infests food processing facilities. Such facilities represent dynamic environments comprising patches of resources of variable size and quality. To understand the influence of resource availability, insect density, and initial life stage on population regulation in <i>T. castaneum</i>, this study assessed the carrying capacity and population growth rates of <i>T. castaneum </i>populations<i> </i>kept for 20 weeks in a closed environment on four different amounts of diet at four starting population levels, then compared <i>T. castaneum</i> attraction to, reproductive output on, and the volatile profiles of previously-infested (e.g., conditioned) flour. Resource availability (e.g. the amount of flour) interacted with founding population density and life stage to influence <i>T. castaneum </i>population dynamics. In resource-limited patches, carrying capacity estimates were similar across founding densities, but the effect of founding population density on carrying capacity increased with flour availability. The opposite was observed for population growth rate, which tended to be more variable for small patches but stabilized as resource availability increased. Interestingly, both effects were reduced for populations founded as larvae compared to those founded as adults. The volatile profile of conditioned flour was also influenced by the interaction of patch size, density, and life stage. The relative abundance of 1-pentadecene and benzoquinones tended to be reduced in the volatile profiles of large patches, whereas 4,8-dimethyldecanal comprised a higher proportion of the total volatile emissions. Conditioned flour from large patches tended to be more attractive to <i>T. castaneum </i>adults, although this effect decreased as founding density increased. By contrast, when populations were founded as larvae, the volatile profiles of <i>T. castaneum </i>attraction to, and <i>T. castaneum </i>fecundity on conditioned flours were similar. These findings expand our understanding of how resource limitation and density-dependent effects influence <i>T. castaneum </i>population regulation and behavior, with implications for long-term trap monitoring and population thresholds in stored products.</p><p dir=\"ltr\">Supplemental Tables are included in the data files and referenced in the published manuscript.</p>",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/62174720",
+ "format": "txt",
+ "mediaType": "text/plain",
+ "title": "README_Tribolium_Density_MS.txt"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/62174723",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "StartAsAdult_Data.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/62174726",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "StartAsLarvae_Data.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/62174729",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "Supplemental Table 1.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/62174732",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "Supplemental Table 2.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/62174735",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "Supplemental Table 3.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/62174738",
+ "format": "xlsx",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet",
+ "title": "Supplemental Table 3.xlsx"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/62174741",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "Supplemental Table 4.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/62174744",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "VOC_Analysis_Data.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/62174747",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "Wind_Tunnel_Data.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/62174750",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "Fecundity_Data.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/62174753",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "Nutrient_Data.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/67471635",
+ "format": "xlsx",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet",
+ "title": "Supplemental Table 1_adult number g larvae.xlsx"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/67471638",
+ "format": "xlsx",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet",
+ "title": "Supplemental Table 2_flour loss glm.xlsx"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/67471641",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/plain",
+ "title": "Supplemental Table 3_reproductive output contrasts.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/67471644",
+ "format": "xlsx",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet",
+ "title": "Supplemental Table 4_Pairwise_G-Test_DFU_adults.xlsx"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/67471647",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "Supplemental Table 5_VOC peak table.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/68074549",
+ "format": "txt",
+ "mediaType": "text/plain",
+ "title": "README_Tribolium_Density_MS_ADDENDUM.txt"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "10.15482/USDA.ADC/31416551.v3",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Red Flour Beetle",
+ "Triboliiu castaneum",
+ "anemotaxis",
+ "carrying capacity limitations",
+ "density regulation",
+ "semiochemicals"
+ ],
+ "license": "https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/",
+ "modified": "2026-08-31",
+ "programCode": [
+ "005:040"
+ ],
+ "publisher": {
+ "@type": "org:Organization",
+ "name": "Agricultural Research Service"
+ },
+ "temporal": "2022-07-01/2025-01-29",
+ "title": "Data from: How you start matters: Density, resource size, and life stage impact population levels for pest insects"
+ },
+ "description": "<p dir=\"ltr\">[Note 2026-08-31: File \"README_Tribolium_Density_MS_ADDENDUM.txt\" was added to dataset.]</p><p dir=\"ltr\">[Note 2026-08-12: Files \"Supplemental Table 1_adult number g larvae.xlsx\", \"Supplemental Table 2_flour loss glm.xlsx\", \"Supplemental Table 3_reproductive output contrasts.csv\", \"Supplemental Table 4_Pairwise_G-Test_DFU_adults.xlsx\", and \"Supplemental Table 5_VOC peak table.csv\" were added to dataset.]</p><p dir=\"ltr\"><i>Tribolium castaneum</i>, the red flour beetle, is a key pest of cereal grains and products that routinely infests food processing facilities. Such facilities represent dynamic environments comprising patches of resources of variable size and quality. To understand the influence of resource availability, insect density, and initial life stage on population regulation in <i>T. castaneum</i>, this study assessed the carrying capacity and population growth rates of <i>T. castaneum </i>populations<i> </i>kept for 20 weeks in a closed environment on four different amounts of diet at four starting population levels, then compared <i>T. castaneum</i> attraction to, reproductive output on, and the volatile profiles of previously-infested (e.g., conditioned) flour. Resource availability (e.g. the amount of flour) interacted with founding population density and life stage to influence <i>T. castaneum </i>population dynamics. In resource-limited patches, carrying capacity estimates were similar across founding densities, but the effect of founding population density on carrying capacity increased with flour availability. The opposite was observed for population growth rate, which tended to be more variable for small patches but stabilized as resource availability increased. Interestingly, both effects were reduced for populations founded as larvae compared to those founded as adults. The volatile profile of conditioned flour was also influenced by the interaction of patch size, density, and life stage. The relative abundance of 1-pentadecene and benzoquinones tended to be reduced in the volatile profiles of large patches, whereas 4,8-dimethyldecanal comprised a higher proportion of the total volatile emissions. Conditioned flour from large patches tended to be more attractive to <i>T. castaneum </i>adults, although this effect decreased as founding density increased. By contrast, when populations were founded as larvae, the volatile profiles of <i>T. castaneum </i>attraction to, and <i>T. castaneum </i>fecundity on conditioned flours were similar. These findings expand our understanding of how resource limitation and density-dependent effects influence <i>T. castaneum </i>population regulation and behavior, with implications for long-term trap monitoring and population thresholds in stored products.</p><p dir=\"ltr\">Supplemental Tables are included in the data files and referenced in the published manuscript.</p>",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "README_Tribolium_Density_MS.txt",
+ "StartAsAdult_Data.csv",
+ "StartAsLarvae_Data.csv",
+ "Supplemental Table 1.csv",
+ "Supplemental Table 2.csv",
+ "Supplemental Table 3.csv",
+ "Supplemental Table 3.xlsx",
+ "Supplemental Table 4.csv",
+ "VOC_Analysis_Data.csv",
+ "Wind_Tunnel_Data.csv",
+ "Fecundity_Data.csv",
+ "Nutrient_Data.csv",
+ "Supplemental Table 1_adult number g larvae.xlsx",
+ "Supplemental Table 2_flour loss glm.xlsx",
+ "Supplemental Table 3_reproductive output contrasts.csv",
+ "Supplemental Table 4_Pairwise_G-Test_DFU_adults.xlsx",
+ "Supplemental Table 5_VOC peak table.csv",
+ "README_Tribolium_Density_MS_ADDENDUM.txt"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/03ce771c-cc47-472e-9448-d42975c5ffe5",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/03ce771c-cc47-472e-9448-d42975c5ffe5/raw",
+ "has_download": true,
+ "has_spatial": false,
+ "identifier": "10.15482/USDA.ADC/31416551.v3",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Red Flour Beetle",
+ "Triboliiu castaneum",
+ "anemotaxis",
+ "carrying capacity limitations",
+ "density regulation",
+ "semiochemicals"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-09-30T21:31:06.890974",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "352b4532-793d-4075-a03f-05b778a3c43a",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/usda.png",
+ "name": "Department of Agriculture",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "usda"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 3,
+ "publisher": "Agricultural Research Service",
+ "slug": "data-from-how-you-start-matters-density-resource-size-and-life-stage-impact-population-lev",
+ "spatial_centroid": null,
+ "spatial_shape": null,
+ "theme": [],
+ "title": "Data from: How you start matters: Density, resource size, and life stage impact population levels for pest insects",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 47.320053,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790803861074,
+ 47.320053,
+ 1,
+ "07a03d07-67fd-4edf-b170-c6bad8f0820d"
+ ],
+ "dcat": {
+ "@type": "dcat:Dataset",
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "accrualPeriodicity": "R/P1Y",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "005:18"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "fn": "Ewing, Patrick M.",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:patrick.ewing@usda.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "<p dir=\"ltr\">This data examines the impact of genotype, environment, and crop management practices on oat (<i>Avena sativa</i> L.) grain yield, milling quality, and nutritional content over three growing seasons (2021-2023). Data were collected at the USDA-ARS-managed Eastern South Dakota Soil and Water Research Farm in Brookings, South Dakota. Treatments included three oat varieties with differing plant architectures, planted at three populations, and co-established (or not) with a medium red clover (<i>Trifolium pratense</i> L.) green manure. Data include weather and oat performance - the latter of which includes biomass and grain yield, grain milling quality, and grain nutrient content. Code to analyze the data and produce figures in the peer-reviewed manuscript is also included. Please see the Metadata for column descriptions.</p><p><br></p><p dir=\"ltr\"><b>NOTICE</b></p><ul><li><b>This repository has been archived and is no longer maintained.</b></li><li>The code is provided for historical reference and <b>may</b> contain unpatched or unknown vulnerabilities.</li><li>It should <b>not</b> be used in production systems.</li></ul><p></p>",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/65657697",
+ "format": "sas",
+ "mediaType": "text/plain",
+ "title": "Oat_2021_2023.sas"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/65657703",
+ "format": "Rmd",
+ "mediaType": "text/plain",
+ "title": "Oat-clover_correlation&tradeoff.Rmd"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/65657706",
+ "format": "Rmd",
+ "mediaType": "text/plain",
+ "title": "Oat-clover_Weather_data.Rmd"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/65657709",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "Oats_2021_2023.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/65657712",
+ "format": "docx",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document",
+ "title": "SAS script for grain yield and quality analysis.docx"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/65657715",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "Weather_Precip_Temp_updated.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/65657721",
+ "format": "docx",
+ "mediaType": "application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document",
+ "title": "Metadata for grain yield and quality and weather data for oat study 2021_2023.docx"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "10.15482/USDA.ADC/28597334.v1",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Grain quality",
+ "Management tactics",
+ "Nutritional traits",
+ "Oat genotypes",
+ "Weather variability",
+ "source code"
+ ],
+ "license": "https://www.usa.gov/publicdomain/label/1.0/",
+ "modified": "2026-09-14",
+ "programCode": [
+ "005:040"
+ ],
+ "publisher": {
+ "@type": "org:Organization",
+ "name": "Agricultural Research Service"
+ },
+ "spatial": "{\"type\": \"Polygon\", \"coordinates\": [[[-96.80578316109442, 44.34997695552039], [-96.80419219677289, 44.34997695552039], [-96.80419219677289, 44.35168406686904], [-96.80578316109442, 44.35168406686904], [-96.80578316109442, 44.34997695552039]]]}",
+ "temporal": "2021-04-01/2023-09-30",
+ "title": "Data from: Genotype, environment and management effect on grain yield and milling quality of oat in Northern Great Plains"
+ },
+ "description": "<p dir=\"ltr\">This data examines the impact of genotype, environment, and crop management practices on oat (<i>Avena sativa</i> L.) grain yield, milling quality, and nutritional content over three growing seasons (2021-2023). Data were collected at the USDA-ARS-managed Eastern South Dakota Soil and Water Research Farm in Brookings, South Dakota. Treatments included three oat varieties with differing plant architectures, planted at three populations, and co-established (or not) with a medium red clover (<i>Trifolium pratense</i> L.) green manure. Data include weather and oat performance - the latter of which includes biomass and grain yield, grain milling quality, and grain nutrient content. Code to analyze the data and produce figures in the peer-reviewed manuscript is also included. Please see the Metadata for column descriptions.</p><p><br></p><p dir=\"ltr\"><b>NOTICE</b></p><ul><li><b>This repository has been archived and is no longer maintained.</b></li><li>The code is provided for historical reference and <b>may</b> contain unpatched or unknown vulnerabilities.</li><li>It should <b>not</b> be used in production systems.</li></ul><p></p>",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "Oat_2021_2023.sas",
+ "Oat-clover_correlation&tradeoff.Rmd",
+ "Oat-clover_Weather_data.Rmd",
+ "Oats_2021_2023.csv",
+ "SAS script for grain yield and quality analysis.docx",
+ "Weather_Precip_Temp_updated.csv",
+ "Metadata for grain yield and quality and weather data for oat study 2021_2023.docx"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/157c7242-e6c0-4aa9-9c6f-bd9bfa2c56c0",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/157c7242-e6c0-4aa9-9c6f-bd9bfa2c56c0/raw",
+ "has_download": true,
+ "has_spatial": true,
+ "identifier": "10.15482/USDA.ADC/28597334.v1",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Grain quality",
+ "Management tactics",
+ "Nutritional traits",
+ "Oat genotypes",
+ "Weather variability",
+ "source code"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-09-30T21:31:01.074724",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "352b4532-793d-4075-a03f-05b778a3c43a",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/usda.png",
+ "name": "Department of Agriculture",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "usda"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 1,
+ "publisher": "Agricultural Research Service",
+ "slug": "data-from-genotype-environment-and-management-effect-on-grain-yield-and-milling-quality-of",
+ "spatial_centroid": {
+ "lat": 44.35065980005985,
+ "lon": -96.80514677536581
+ },
+ "spatial_shape": {
+ "coordinates": [
+ [
+ [
+ -96.80578316109442,
+ 44.34997695552039
+ ],
+ [
+ -96.80419219677289,
+ 44.34997695552039
+ ],
+ [
+ -96.80419219677289,
+ 44.35168406686904
+ ],
+ [
+ -96.80578316109442,
+ 44.35168406686904
+ ],
+ [
+ -96.80578316109442,
+ 44.34997695552039
+ ]
+ ]
+ ],
+ "type": "Polygon"
+ },
+ "theme": [],
+ "title": "Data from: Genotype, environment and management effect on grain yield and milling quality of oat in Northern Great Plains",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 32.40976,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790803856437,
+ 32.40976,
+ 0,
+ "8ddaa15c-f0c8-4132-b7bb-025e4679dad5"
+ ],
+ "dcat": {
+ "@type": "dcat:Dataset",
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "005:18"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "fn": "Copeland, Stella",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:stella.copeland@usda.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "<p dir=\"ltr\">[NOTE 2026-09-04: Data files revised]</p><p dir=\"ltr\">Crested wheatgrass is widely, and historically, seeded across sagebrush steppe rangelands to increase perennial cover and compete with invasive annual grasses post-fire, however, outcomes vary, likely due to complex combinations of site environmental variables and weather. This study examines variation in vegetation characteristics in post-fire areas associated with crested wheatgrass seeding, and environmental variables, in the northern Great Basin. We selected 124 treatments on Bureau of Land Management lands seeded post-fire with crested wheatgrass over the past two decades in two ecoregions (Snake River Plain, Northern Basin and Range). We selected target 30 m pixels and matched them to 150 reference pixels based on environmental similarity and burn severity within 0.3-3.5 km radius in unseeded areas. We compared change overtime post-seeding in the target pixels to reference pixels with a synthetic control method, comparing pre-fire differences in vegetation between target and reference pixels to post-seeding outcomes. We extracted effect sizes at 5 and 10 years post-fire. We tested for the effects of fire severity, elevation, sand content, and spring precipitation in two time points on seeding effects for each type of cover.</p>",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/68217097",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "burn_trt_yrs.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/68217100",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "burn_trt_yrs_metadata.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/68217103",
+ "format": "csv",
+ "mediaType": "text/csv",
+ "title": "core_data.csv"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/68217106",
+ "format": "txt",
+ "mediaType": "text/plain",
+ "title": "core_data_metadata.txt"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/68217109",
+ "format": "zip",
+ "mediaType": "application/zip",
+ "title": "tgt_pix_centroid.zip"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/68217112",
+ "format": "zip",
+ "mediaType": "application/zip",
+ "title": "ref_pix_centroid.zip"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "downloadURL": "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/68217115",
+ "format": "zip",
+ "mediaType": "application/zip",
+ "title": "TrtPoly.zip"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "10.15482/USDA.ADC/30811058.v2",
+ "keyword": [
+ "bare ground",
+ "crested wheatgrass",
+ "invasive annual grasses",
+ "sagebrush steppe",
+ "shrub",
+ "synthetic control"
+ ],
+ "license": "https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/",
+ "modified": "2026-09-08",
+ "programCode": [
+ "005:040"
+ ],
+ "publisher": {
+ "@type": "org:Organization",
+ "name": "Agricultural Research Service"
+ },
+ "temporal": "1992-01-01/2023-12-30",
+ "title": "Data from: Variability in vegetation outcomes in widespread post-fire non-native perennial grass seedings associated with site environment and weather"
+ },
+ "description": "<p dir=\"ltr\">[NOTE 2026-09-04: Data files revised]</p><p dir=\"ltr\">Crested wheatgrass is widely, and historically, seeded across sagebrush steppe rangelands to increase perennial cover and compete with invasive annual grasses post-fire, however, outcomes vary, likely due to complex combinations of site environmental variables and weather. This study examines variation in vegetation characteristics in post-fire areas associated with crested wheatgrass seeding, and environmental variables, in the northern Great Basin. We selected 124 treatments on Bureau of Land Management lands seeded post-fire with crested wheatgrass over the past two decades in two ecoregions (Snake River Plain, Northern Basin and Range). We selected target 30 m pixels and matched them to 150 reference pixels based on environmental similarity and burn severity within 0.3-3.5 km radius in unseeded areas. We compared change overtime post-seeding in the target pixels to reference pixels with a synthetic control method, comparing pre-fire differences in vegetation between target and reference pixels to post-seeding outcomes. We extracted effect sizes at 5 and 10 years post-fire. We tested for the effects of fire severity, elevation, sand content, and spring precipitation in two time points on seeding effects for each type of cover.</p>",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "burn_trt_yrs.csv",
+ "burn_trt_yrs_metadata.csv",
+ "core_data.csv",
+ "core_data_metadata.txt",
+ "tgt_pix_centroid.zip",
+ "ref_pix_centroid.zip",
+ "TrtPoly.zip"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/204e2b8d-1f6b-4af1-a4ca-f3b1759c6756",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/204e2b8d-1f6b-4af1-a4ca-f3b1759c6756/raw",
+ "has_download": true,
+ "has_spatial": false,
+ "identifier": "10.15482/USDA.ADC/30811058.v2",
+ "keyword": [
+ "bare ground",
+ "crested wheatgrass",
+ "invasive annual grasses",
+ "sagebrush steppe",
+ "shrub",
+ "synthetic control"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-09-30T21:30:56.437469",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "352b4532-793d-4075-a03f-05b778a3c43a",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/usda.png",
+ "name": "Department of Agriculture",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "usda"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 0,
+ "publisher": "Agricultural Research Service",
+ "slug": "data-from-variability-in-vegetation-outcomes-in-widespread-post-fire-non-native-perennial-",
+ "spatial_centroid": null,
+ "spatial_shape": null,
+ "theme": [],
+ "title": "Data from: Variability in vegetation outcomes in widespread post-fire non-native perennial grass seedings associated with site environment and weather",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 3.7073069,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790803240214,
+ 3.7073069,
+ 2,
+ "6c61f8c3-5627-4086-af57-00e6e537f626"
  ],
  "dcat": {
  "accessLevel": "public",
  "bureauCode": [
- "010:12"
+ "010:24"
  ],
  "contactPoint": {
  "@type": "vcard:Contact",
- "fn": "Ryan F. Thompson