Timeline / Data.gov — Environment Datasets

changed Source changed

A new raw object was archived. Both versions are preserved. 3117 line(s) added, 4530 line(s) removed.

Evidence

What changed derived

This diff is not evidence. It was produced by civic-memory.diff_engine 1.1.0 at 2026-10-02T06:26:17+00:00 by normalizing the two archived objects above. The objects are authoritative; this reading of them can be regenerated or deleted without loss. 3117 line(s) added, 4530 line(s) removed.

--- previous
+++ current
@@ -1,11 +1,3100 @@
 {
- "after": "WzE3OTA3OTQ0MDQ4MDAsMjMuMTI2MjksMywiNzExNmRmNzQtNGVkZS00OTU3LWJkNmMtZDJlOGU4YmI0YThiIl0=",
+ "after": "WzE3OTA3OTQ2MjM2MjAsNC43NTkyNTU0LDIsImZkNDYyOTQ2LTY4NWUtNDA1Yi1hMTU3LWJkOGZjOWQ4NGM5OCJd",
  "results": [
  {
- "_score": 7.6866255,
+ "_score": 7.435882,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790910200939,
+ 7.435882,
+ 3,
+ "ce072083-3d60-446e-ae55-4434e132e84c"
+ ],
+ "access_level": "public",
+ "dcat": {
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "010:12"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "@type": "vcard:Contact",
+ "fn": "Michelle A Stern",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:mstern@usgs.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "This data release contains monthly 270-meter resolution Basin Characterization Model (BCMv8) climate and hydrologic variables for Localized Constructed Analog (LOCA; Pierce et al., 2014)-downscaled Global Climate Models (GCMs) for Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 4.5 (medium-low emissions) and 8.5 (high emissions) for hydrologic California. The 20 future climate scenarios consist of ten GCMs with RCP 4.5 and 8.5 each: ACCESS 1.0, CanESM2, CCSM4, CESM1-BGC, CMCC-CMS, CNRM-CM5, GFDL-CM3, HadGEM2-CC, HadGEM2-ES, and MIROC5. The LOCA climate scenarios span water years 1950 to 2099 with greenhouse-gas forcings beginning in 2006. The LOCA downscaling method has been shown to produce better estimates of extreme events and reduces the common downscaling problem of too many low-precipitation days (Pierce et al., 2014). Ten GCMs were selected from the full ensemble of models from the fifth Coupled Model Intercomparison Project from the World Climate Research Programme (CMIP5) based on GCM historical performance to address specific needs for California water-resource planning (California Department of Water Resources Climate Change Technical Advisory Group, 2015). The 10 GCMs with RCP 4.5 and 8.5 each were statistically downscaled using the LOCA method (Pierce et al., 2014) from 2-degree (approximately 222-kilometer; km) quadrangles to 6-km resolution. Next, the scenarios were spatially downscaled from 6 km to 270 meters (Flint and Flint, 2012) and run through the BCMv8 using the same model parameters and input files as the historical BCM model (BCMv8; Flint et al., 2021).\nDownscaled gridded climate variables include precipitation (ppt), minimum temperature (tmn), maximum temperature (tmx), and potential evapotranspiration (pet). Gridded hydrologic variables include actual evapotranspiration (aet), climatic water deficit (cwd), snowpack (pck), recharge (rch), runoff (run), and soil storage (str). The units for temperature variables are degrees Celsius, and all other variables are in millimeters per month. Monthly variables from water years 1951 to 2099 are summarized into water year files (for example, water year 1951 includes October 1950 - September 1951) and 30-year average summaries from 1951 to 2099. Raster grids are in the NAD83 California Teale Albers, (meters) projection in an open format ascii text file (*.asc). \nThis data release includes a child item for each GCM. Each GCM child item contains two RCP (4.5 & 8.5) child items. Each RCP child item contains 4 child items:\n1. 30-year summaries (Water year files averaged for selected 30-year periods, zipped by variable)\n2. Monthly BCM hydrology variables (monthly BCM hydrology variables zipped by decade)\n3. Monthly climate variables (monthly climate variables zipped by decade)\n4. Water year summaries (monthly files summed (aet, cwd, pck, rch, run, str, pet, and ppt) or averaged (tmn and tmx) by water year, zipped by variable)\nReferences cited:\nCalifornia Department of Water Resources Climate Change Technical Advisory Group, 2015, Perspectives and guidance for climate change analysis: Sacramento, Calif., California Department of Water Resources Technical Information Record, 142 p.\nFlint, L.E., Flint, A.L., and Stern, M.A., 2021, The Basin Characterization Model - A monthly regional water balance software package (BCMv8) data release and model archive for hydrologic California (ver. 3.0, June 2023): U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P9PT36UI.\nFlint, L.E., and Flint, A.L., 2012, Downscaling future climate scenarios to fine scales for hydrologic and ecological modeling and analysis: Ecological Processes, v. 1, no. 2, 15 p., https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-1709-1-2.\nPierce, D.W., Cayan, D.R. and Thrasher, B.L., 2014. Statistical downscaling using localized constructed analogs (LOCA). Journal of hydrometeorology, 15(6), pp.2558-2585.",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.5066/P9K23J25",
+ "description": "Landing page for access to the data",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "application/http",
+ "title": "Digital Data"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "description": "The metadata original format",
+ "downloadURL": "https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.61e069f3d34e8911d9fe9dba.xml",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "Original Metadata"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_61e069f3d34e8911d9fe9dba",
+ "keyword": [
+ "California",
+ "USGS:61e069f3d34e8911d9fe9dba",
+ "United States",
+ "atmospheric and climatic processes",
+ "climate change",
+ "climatologyMeteorologyAtmosphere",
+ "environment",
+ "evaporation",
+ "geoscientificInformation",
+ "geospatial datasets",
+ "hydrology",
+ "inlandWaters",
+ "mathematical modeling",
+ "permeability",
+ "precipitation (atmospheric)",
+ "snow and ice cover",
+ "soil moisture",
+ "streamflow",
+ "surface water (non-marine)",
+ "transpiration",
+ "water budget",
+ "water cycle",
+ "water resources",
+ "watershed management"
+ ],
+ "modified": "2026-09-29T00:00:00Z",
+ "publisher": {
+ "@type": "org:Organization",
+ "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"
+ },
+ "spatial": "-124.9805, 32.5300, -114.1200, 43.4210",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Future Climate and Hydrology from Twenty Localized Constructed Analog (LOCA) Scenarios and the Basin Characterization Model (BCMv8) (ver. 1.1, November 2024)"
+ },
+ "description": "This data release contains monthly 270-meter resolution Basin Characterization Model (BCMv8) climate and hydrologic variables for Localized Constructed Analog (LOCA; Pierce et al., 2014)-downscaled Global Climate Models (GCMs) for Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 4.5 (medium-low emissions) and 8.5 (high emissions) for hydrologic California. The 20 future climate scenarios consist of ten GCMs with RCP 4.5 and 8.5 each: ACCESS 1.0, CanESM2, CCSM4, CESM1-BGC, CMCC-CMS, CNRM-CM5, GFDL-CM3, HadGEM2-CC, HadGEM2-ES, and MIROC5. The LOCA climate scenarios span water years 1950 to 2099 with greenhouse-gas forcings beginning in 2006. The LOCA downscaling method has been shown to produce better estimates of extreme events and reduces the common downscaling problem of too many low-precipitation days (Pierce et al., 2014). Ten GCMs were selected from the full ensemble of models from the fifth Coupled Model Intercomparison Project from the World Climate Research Programme (CMIP5) based on GCM historical performance to address specific needs for California water-resource planning (California Department of Water Resources Climate Change Technical Advisory Group, 2015). The 10 GCMs with RCP 4.5 and 8.5 each were statistically downscaled using the LOCA method (Pierce et al., 2014) from 2-degree (approximately 222-kilometer; km) quadrangles to 6-km resolution. Next, the scenarios were spatially downscaled from 6 km to 270 meters (Flint and Flint, 2012) and run through the BCMv8 using the same model parameters and input files as the historical BCM model (BCMv8; Flint et al., 2021).\nDownscaled gridded climate variables include precipitation (ppt), minimum temperature (tmn), maximum temperature (tmx), and potential evapotranspiration (pet). Gridded hydrologic variables include actual evapotranspiration (aet), climatic water deficit (cwd), snowpack (pck), recharge (rch), runoff (run), and soil storage (str). The units for temperature variables are degrees Celsius, and all other variables are in millimeters per month. Monthly variables from water years 1951 to 2099 are summarized into water year files (for example, water year 1951 includes October 1950 - September 1951) and 30-year average summaries from 1951 to 2099. Raster grids are in the NAD83 California Teale Albers, (meters) projection in an open format ascii text file (*.asc). \nThis data release includes a child item for each GCM. Each GCM child item contains two RCP (4.5 & 8.5) child items. Each RCP child item contains 4 child items:\n1. 30-year summaries (Water year files averaged for selected 30-year periods, zipped by variable)\n2. Monthly BCM hydrology variables (monthly BCM hydrology variables zipped by decade)\n3. Monthly climate variables (monthly climate variables zipped by decade)\n4. Water year summaries (monthly files summed (aet, cwd, pck, rch, run, str, pet, and ppt) or averaged (tmn and tmx) by water year, zipped by variable)\nReferences cited:\nCalifornia Department of Water Resources Climate Change Technical Advisory Group, 2015, Perspectives and guidance for climate change analysis: Sacramento, Calif., California Department of Water Resources Technical Information Record, 142 p.\nFlint, L.E., Flint, A.L., and Stern, M.A., 2021, The Basin Characterization Model - A monthly regional water balance software package (BCMv8) data release and model archive for hydrologic California (ver. 3.0, June 2023): U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P9PT36UI.\nFlint, L.E., and Flint, A.L., 2012, Downscaling future climate scenarios to fine scales for hydrologic and ecological modeling and analysis: Ecological Processes, v. 1, no. 2, 15 p., https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-1709-1-2.\nPierce, D.W., Cayan, D.R. and Thrasher, B.L., 2014. Statistical downscaling using localized constructed analogs (LOCA). Journal of hydrometeorology, 15(6), pp.2558-2585.",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "Digital Data",
+ "Original Metadata"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/623fc74d-3f20-4e29-9880-4b2f99351f63",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/623fc74d-3f20-4e29-9880-4b2f99351f63/raw",
+ "has_download": true,
+ "has_spatial": true,
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_61e069f3d34e8911d9fe9dba",
+ "keyword": [
+ "California",
+ "USGS:61e069f3d34e8911d9fe9dba",
+ "United States",
+ "atmospheric and climatic processes",
+ "climate change",
+ "climatologyMeteorologyAtmosphere",
+ "environment",
+ "evaporation",
+ "geoscientificInformation",
+ "geospatial datasets",
+ "hydrology",
+ "inlandWaters",
+ "mathematical modeling",
+ "permeability",
+ "precipitation (atmospheric)",
+ "snow and ice cover",
+ "soil moisture",
+ "streamflow",
+ "surface water (non-marine)",
+ "transpiration",
+ "water budget",
+ "water cycle",
+ "water resources",
+ "watershed management"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-10-02T03:03:20.939683",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png",
+ "name": "Department of the Interior",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "doi"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 3,
+ "publisher": "U.S. Geological Survey",
+ "slug": "future-climate-and-hydrology-from-twenty-localized-constructed-analog-loca-scenarios--2024",
+ "spatial_centroid": {
+ "lat": 36.8864,
+ "lon": -120.6363
+ },
+ "spatial_shape": {
+ "coordinates": [
+ [
+ [
+ -124.9805,
+ 32.53
+ ],
+ [
+ -124.9805,
+ 43.421
+ ],
+ [
+ -114.12,
+ 43.421
+ ],
+ [
+ -114.12,
+ 32.53
+ ],
+ [
+ -124.9805,
+ 32.53
+ ]
+ ]
+ ],
+ "type": "Polygon"
+ },
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Future Climate and Hydrology from Twenty Localized Constructed Analog (LOCA) Scenarios and the Basin Characterization Model (BCMv8) (ver. 1.1, November 2024)",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 10.239944,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790910053505,
+ 10.239944,
+ 0,
+ "c522dc22-15d7-4eee-9fe4-73d863d8b035"
+ ],
+ "access_level": "public",
+ "dcat": {
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "010:12"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "@type": "vcard:Contact",
+ "fn": "Scott W Anderson",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:swanderson@usgs.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "Hydrophones were installed on the Skagit River just upstream of Illabot Creek in October 2020. Two independent acoustic recorder units were installed, one on each bank, with two hydrophone sensors linked to each unit. The left bank installation was located along a steep bank. The right bank installation was located along the margin of a small gravel bar that was exposed during very low flow. No data were recorded at one sensor on the right bank due to a connectivity issue, resulting in only a single channel in the stereo audio files. Data were collected from late October, 2020, through early October, 2021. Units were programmed to collect data every 15 minutes whenever a local water sensor was submerged. Technical issues with the water level sensor resulted in frequent recordings at low flows, including times when hydrophones were out of the water. \nMcBain and Associates attempted bedload sampling at the site on February 22, 2021. Sampling was performed from a cataraft attached to a channel-spanning cableway, using a Toutle River II bedload sampler. Several test transects were completed and yielded minor sand and a few pebbles. No further sampling was conducted and the samples were discarded without processing. Discharge at the site was estimated based on the sum of discharge at U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) streamgage 12181000 (Skagit River at Marblemount) and USGS streamgage 12182500 (Cascade River at Marblemount). In combination, the two discharge monitoring sites account for 96 percent of the contributing area at the hydrophone monitoring site near Illabot Creek. The final estimated discharge was then calculated as the sum of monitored discharge at those two sites scaled up by a drainage-area factor of 1.04. \nEach hydrophone unit consisted of custom-built controller and recording system to which one or two distinct hydrophone sensors were attached (Marineau and others, 2016). The controller/recording unit consisted of a Raspberry Pi Zero W using a UUGear Witty Pi 4 real-time clock for time information. These systems used H2a-XLR hydrophones (Aquarian Audio, 2024). Each hydrophone was installed in 0.75-inch 90-degree polyvinyl chloride (PVC) street elbows connected to 0.75-inch non-metallic conduit and affixed to the bed during low-flow conditions using rebar pounded into the gravel substrate and a combination of metal hose clamps and nylon zip ties. The two hydrophones were installed several feet apart with sensors facing towards the center of the channel. Hydrophones were connected to the controller through ART ProAudio Dual Pre Project Series preamplifier with gain set to 10 decibels. When operating, the system would record one-minute 16-bit stereo audio files with a 44.1 kilohertz sampling rate at 15-minute intervals. Audio was recorded in Waveform Audio File (WAV) format and then compressed to Free Lossless Audio Codec (FLAC) format for local storage. \nRaw audio files were processed in R to obtain average acoustic pressure in micropascals as a function of frequency using methods discussed in Geay and others (2017). The primary processing tool was the specgram function from the Signal (2023) R package, which applies a Fourier transform to sequential slices of individual audio files to obtain a table of frequency response over time. Processing was done using a Hamming window, dividing the file into 2048 sub-intervals with 50 percent overlap. The output was normalized based on the dynamic range (2.5) and sensitivity (-180 decibels) of the hydrophones and gain of the pre-amplifier (10 decibels) to obtain results in micropascals. The result is a table describing acoustic pressure by frequency at equal 21.5 Hz intervals between 0 and 22 kHz for each of the 2048 time sub-intervals. Final output was then summarized as the median acoustic pressure value for each frequency. This process was done for each channel of the stereo audio files separately. \nAny use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. These data are marked with a Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal (CC0-1.0) public domain dedication and do not have any use constraints.",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.5066/P9XEISWS",
+ "description": "Landing page for access to the data",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "application/http",
+ "title": "Digital Data"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "description": "The metadata original format",
+ "downloadURL": "https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.6463fa83d34ec179a83d30bf.xml",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "Original Metadata"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6463fa83d34ec179a83d30bf",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Skagit River",
+ "State of Washington",
+ "USGS:6463fa83d34ec179a83d30bf",
+ "acoustic methods",
+ "environment",
+ "sediment transport"
+ ],
+ "modified": "2026-09-29T00:00:00Z",
+ "publisher": {
+ "@type": "org:Organization",
+ "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"
+ },
+ "spatial": "-121.514668, 48.498066, -121.511986, 48.500071",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Hydrophone data from the Skagit River near Illabot Creek, Washington, October 2020 to October 2021"
+ },
+ "description": "Hydrophones were installed on the Skagit River just upstream of Illabot Creek in October 2020. Two independent acoustic recorder units were installed, one on each bank, with two hydrophone sensors linked to each unit. The left bank installation was located along a steep bank. The right bank installation was located along the margin of a small gravel bar that was exposed during very low flow. No data were recorded at one sensor on the right bank due to a connectivity issue, resulting in only a single channel in the stereo audio files. Data were collected from late October, 2020, through early October, 2021. Units were programmed to collect data every 15 minutes whenever a local water sensor was submerged. Technical issues with the water level sensor resulted in frequent recordings at low flows, including times when hydrophones were out of the water. \nMcBain and Associates attempted bedload sampling at the site on February 22, 2021. Sampling was performed from a cataraft attached to a channel-spanning cableway, using a Toutle River II bedload sampler. Several test transects were completed and yielded minor sand and a few pebbles. No further sampling was conducted and the samples were discarded without processing. Discharge at the site was estimated based on the sum of discharge at U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) streamgage 12181000 (Skagit River at Marblemount) and USGS streamgage 12182500 (Cascade River at Marblemount). In combination, the two discharge monitoring sites account for 96 percent of the contributing area at the hydrophone monitoring site near Illabot Creek. The final estimated discharge was then calculated as the sum of monitored discharge at those two sites scaled up by a drainage-area factor of 1.04. \nEach hydrophone unit consisted of custom-built controller and recording system to which one or two distinct hydrophone sensors were attached (Marineau and others, 2016). The controller/recording unit consisted of a Raspberry Pi Zero W using a UUGear Witty Pi 4 real-time clock for time information. These systems used H2a-XLR hydrophones (Aquarian Audio, 2024). Each hydrophone was installed in 0.75-inch 90-degree polyvinyl chloride (PVC) street elbows connected to 0.75-inch non-metallic conduit and affixed to the bed during low-flow conditions using rebar pounded into the gravel substrate and a combination of metal hose clamps and nylon zip ties. The two hydrophones were installed several feet apart with sensors facing towards the center of the channel. Hydrophones were connected to the controller through ART ProAudio Dual Pre Project Series preamplifier with gain set to 10 decibels. When operating, the system would record one-minute 16-bit stereo audio files with a 44.1 kilohertz sampling rate at 15-minute intervals. Audio was recorded in Waveform Audio File (WAV) format and then compressed to Free Lossless Audio Codec (FLAC) format for local storage. \nRaw audio files were processed in R to obtain average acoustic pressure in micropascals as a function of frequency using methods discussed in Geay and others (2017). The primary processing tool was the specgram function from the Signal (2023) R package, which applies a Fourier transform to sequential slices of individual audio files to obtain a table of frequency response over time. Processing was done using a Hamming window, dividing the file into 2048 sub-intervals with 50 percent overlap. The output was normalized based on the dynamic range (2.5) and sensitivity (-180 decibels) of the hydrophones and gain of the pre-amplifier (10 decibels) to obtain results in micropascals. The result is a table describing acoustic pressure by frequency at equal 21.5 Hz intervals between 0 and 22 kHz for each of the 2048 time sub-intervals. Final output was then summarized as the median acoustic pressure value for each frequency. This process was done for each channel of the stereo audio files separately. \nAny use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. These data are marked with a Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal (CC0-1.0) public domain dedication and do not have any use constraints.",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "Digital Data",
+ "Original Metadata"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/2965e06a-b559-4f32-965a-9a31a925bf49",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/2965e06a-b559-4f32-965a-9a31a925bf49/raw",
+ "has_download": true,
+ "has_spatial": true,
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6463fa83d34ec179a83d30bf",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Skagit River",
+ "State of Washington",
+ "USGS:6463fa83d34ec179a83d30bf",
+ "acoustic methods",
+ "environment",
+ "sediment transport"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-10-02T03:00:53.505557",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png",
+ "name": "Department of the Interior",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "doi"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 0,
+ "publisher": "U.S. Geological Survey",
+ "slug": "hydrophone-data-from-the-skagit-river-near-illabot-creek-washington-october-2020-to-o-2021",
+ "spatial_centroid": {
+ "lat": 48.498868,
+ "lon": -121.51359520000001
+ },
+ "spatial_shape": {
+ "coordinates": [
+ [
+ [
+ -121.514668,
+ 48.498066
+ ],
+ [
+ -121.514668,
+ 48.500071
+ ],
+ [
+ -121.511986,
+ 48.500071
+ ],
+ [
+ -121.511986,
+ 48.498066
+ ],
+ [
+ -121.514668,
+ 48.498066
+ ]
+ ]
+ ],
+ "type": "Polygon"
+ },
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Hydrophone data from the Skagit River near Illabot Creek, Washington, October 2020 to October 2021",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 7.181552,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790910022037,
+ 7.181552,
+ 0,
+ "c66f973a-3349-4210-8a5b-1e52a177d720"
+ ],
+ "access_level": "public",
+ "dcat": {
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "010:12"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "@type": "vcard:Contact",
+ "fn": "U.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Science Center",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:gs-ak_asc_datamanagers@usgs.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "This data release provides Alaska breeding landbirds population estimates from three hierarchical Bayesian population trend models, following the methods of Handel and Sauer (2017) and Amundson et al. (2014). The three models are: (1) ALMS only - uses point-count data from the Alaska Landbird Monitoring Survey (ALMS) off-road points counts in Bird Conservation Regions (BCR) 4 (Northwestern Interior Forest) and 5 (Northern Pacific Rainforest), (2) BBS only - uses the North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) road-based, and (3) and Joint - uses data from both surveys. BCRs are defined according to the North American Bird Conservation Initiative (https://nabci-us.org/).",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.5066/P145QNYH",
+ "description": "Landing page for access to the data",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "application/http",
+ "title": "Digital Data"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "description": "The metadata original format",
+ "downloadURL": "https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.6abbe1ac1ba49b5433bab304.xml",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "Original Metadata"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6abbe1ac1ba49b5433bab304",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Animal and plant census",
+ "Animals/vertebrates",
+ "Biodiversity",
+ "Biogeography",
+ "Biota",
+ "Birds",
+ "Cranes and allies",
+ "Ducks/geese/swans",
+ "Eagle/falcons/hawks and allies",
+ "Ecology",
+ "Environment",
+ "Field inventory and monitoring",
+ "Grebes",
+ "Habitats",
+ "Herons/egrets and allies",
+ "Loons",
+ "Migratory birds",
+ "Ornithology",
+ "Perching Birds",
+ "Sandpipers",
+ "Spatial distribution",
+ "Terrestrial ecosystems",
+ "USGS:6abbe1ac1ba49b5433bab304",
+ "Waders/gulls/auks and allies",
+ "Wildlife"
+ ],
+ "modified": "2026-09-29T00:00:00Z",
+ "publisher": {
+ "@type": "org:Organization",
+ "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"
+ },
+ "spatial": "170, 51, -128, 72",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Alaska Landbird Monitoring Survey (ALMS) Population Trend Estimates"
+ },
+ "description": "This data release provides Alaska breeding landbirds population estimates from three hierarchical Bayesian population trend models, following the methods of Handel and Sauer (2017) and Amundson et al. (2014). The three models are: (1) ALMS only - uses point-count data from the Alaska Landbird Monitoring Survey (ALMS) off-road points counts in Bird Conservation Regions (BCR) 4 (Northwestern Interior Forest) and 5 (Northern Pacific Rainforest), (2) BBS only - uses the North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) road-based, and (3) and Joint - uses data from both surveys. BCRs are defined according to the North American Bird Conservation Initiative (https://nabci-us.org/).",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "Digital Data",
+ "Original Metadata"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/6ac40006-fb51-4c7e-b159-397e9e098c6f",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/6ac40006-fb51-4c7e-b159-397e9e098c6f/raw",
+ "has_download": true,
+ "has_spatial": true,
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6abbe1ac1ba49b5433bab304",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Animal and plant census",
+ "Animals/vertebrates",
+ "Biodiversity",
+ "Biogeography",
+ "Biota",
+ "Birds",
+ "Cranes and allies",
+ "Ducks/geese/swans",
+ "Eagle/falcons/hawks and allies",
+ "Ecology",
+ "Environment",
+ "Field inventory and monitoring",
+ "Grebes",
+ "Habitats",
+ "Herons/egrets and allies",
+ "Loons",
+ "Migratory birds",
+ "Ornithology",
+ "Perching Birds",
+ "Sandpipers",
+ "Spatial distribution",
+ "Terrestrial ecosystems",
+ "USGS:6abbe1ac1ba49b5433bab304",
+ "Waders/gulls/auks and allies",
+ "Wildlife"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-10-02T03:00:22.037345",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png",
+ "name": "Department of the Interior",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "doi"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 0,
+ "publisher": "U.S. Geological Survey",
+ "slug": "alaska-landbird-monitoring-survey-alms-population-trend-estimates",
+ "spatial_centroid": {
+ "lat": 59.4,
+ "lon": 50.8
+ },
+ "spatial_shape": {
+ "coordinates": [
+ [
+ [
+ 170,
+ 51
+ ],
+ [
+ 170,
+ 72
+ ],
+ [
+ -128,
+ 72
+ ],
+ [
+ -128,
+ 51
+ ],
+ [
+ 170,
+ 51
+ ]
+ ]
+ ],
+ "type": "Polygon"
+ },
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Alaska Landbird Monitoring Survey (ALMS) Population Trend Estimates",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 10.328017,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790909913078,
+ 10.328017,
+ 0,
+ "36cef0f0-a815-400b-ac41-b5746f702111"
+ ],
+ "access_level": "public",
+ "dcat": {
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "010:12"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "@type": "vcard:Contact",
+ "fn": "Nicholas M Enwright",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:enwrightn@usgs.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "This data release includes 2024 data for the Louisiana Outer Coast Restoration Project for North Breton Island. Specifically, this data release includes a detailed habitat map, general habitat map, and georeferenced imagery. These habitat maps are developed using the methods and classification scheme from Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority’s (CPRA) Barrier Island Comprehensive Monitoring (BICM) program. For more details on BICM habitat classes, see the Entity and Attribute Information section of the metadata. Please consult the accompanying readME.txt file for information and recommendations on the contents of this dataset (that is, dataset and recommended symbology). For more information about BICM habitat mapping, see Enwright and others (2020).\nEnwright, N.M., SooHoo, W.M., Dugas, J.L., Conzelmann, C.P., Laurenzano, C., Lee, D.M., Mouton, K., and Stelly, S.J., 2020, Louisiana Barrier Island Comprehensive Monitoring Program—Mapping habitats in beach, dune, and intertidal environments along the Louisiana Gulf of Mexico shoreline, 2008 and 2015–16: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2020–1030, 57 p.,\nhttps://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20201030.",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.5066/P1F7KRYK",
+ "description": "Landing page for access to the data",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "application/http",
+ "title": "Digital Data"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "description": "The metadata original format",
+ "downloadURL": "https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.6a8db2291ba49bbf954e4ca7.xml",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "Original Metadata"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6a8db2291ba49bbf954e4ca7",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Gulf of America",
+ "Louisiana",
+ "Plaquemines Parish",
+ "USGS:6a8db2291ba49bbf954e4ca7",
+ "environment",
+ "geoscientificInformation",
+ "imageryBaseMapsEarthCover"
+ ],
+ "modified": "2026-09-29T00:00:00Z",
+ "publisher": {
+ "@type": "org:Organization",
+ "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"
+ },
+ "spatial": "-89.26744, 29.44893, -89.13066, 29.53400",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Louisiana Outer Coast Restoration Project – 2024 habitat map, North Breton Island"
+ },
+ "description": "This data release includes 2024 data for the Louisiana Outer Coast Restoration Project for North Breton Island. Specifically, this data release includes a detailed habitat map, general habitat map, and georeferenced imagery. These habitat maps are developed using the methods and classification scheme from Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority’s (CPRA) Barrier Island Comprehensive Monitoring (BICM) program. For more details on BICM habitat classes, see the Entity and Attribute Information section of the metadata. Please consult the accompanying readME.txt file for information and recommendations on the contents of this dataset (that is, dataset and recommended symbology). For more information about BICM habitat mapping, see Enwright and others (2020).\nEnwright, N.M., SooHoo, W.M., Dugas, J.L., Conzelmann, C.P., Laurenzano, C., Lee, D.M., Mouton, K., and Stelly, S.J., 2020, Louisiana Barrier Island Comprehensive Monitoring Program—Mapping habitats in beach, dune, and intertidal environments along the Louisiana Gulf of Mexico shoreline, 2008 and 2015–16: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2020–1030, 57 p.,\nhttps://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20201030.",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "Digital Data",
+ "Original Metadata"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/35cd48f4-4651-4e20-8ab7-e900bf8418b0",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/35cd48f4-4651-4e20-8ab7-e900bf8418b0/raw",
+ "has_download": true,
+ "has_spatial": true,
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6a8db2291ba49bbf954e4ca7",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Gulf of America",
+ "Louisiana",
+ "Plaquemines Parish",
+ "USGS:6a8db2291ba49bbf954e4ca7",
+ "environment",
+ "geoscientificInformation",
+ "imageryBaseMapsEarthCover"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-10-02T02:58:33.078735",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png",
+ "name": "Department of the Interior",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "doi"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 0,
+ "publisher": "U.S. Geological Survey",
+ "slug": "louisiana-outer-coast-restoration-project-2024-habitat-map-north-breton-island",
+ "spatial_centroid": {
+ "lat": 29.482958000000004,
+ "lon": -89.212728
+ },
+ "spatial_shape": {
+ "coordinates": [
+ [
+ [
+ -89.26744,
+ 29.44893
+ ],
+ [
+ -89.26744,
+ 29.534
+ ],
+ [
+ -89.13066,
+ 29.534
+ ],
+ [
+ -89.13066,
+ 29.44893
+ ],
+ [
+ -89.26744,
+ 29.44893
+ ]
+ ]
+ ],
+ "type": "Polygon"
+ },
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Louisiana Outer Coast Restoration Project – 2024 habitat map, North Breton Island",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 8.60878,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790909747668,
+ 8.60878,
+ 0,
+ "e70d2755-b24d-4849-af73-9e8d8dab856a"
+ ],
+ "access_level": "public",
+ "dcat": {
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "010:12"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "@type": "vcard:Contact",
+ "fn": "Lisa Gaines",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:lisa.gaines@oregonstate.edu"
+ },
+ "description": "Management actions may have a higher probability of being successful if they are informed by available scientific knowledge and findings; a systematic review process provides a mechanism to scientifically assess management questions. By evaluating specific actions on scientific knowledge and findings, we may be able to increase management effectiveness and efficiency. The goal of the Available Science Assessment Project (ASAP) is to synthesize and evaluate the body of scientific knowledge on specific, on-the-ground CAAs to determine the conditions, timeframes, and geographic areas where particular CAAs may be most effective for resource managers. We have derived a methodology that utilizes interviews, a systematic review process, and extensive engagement with natural resource managers and scientists throughout the Northwest Climate Science Center (NW CSC) region. For a test case, we will evaluate the science behind specific fire management actions in national forests in the region.",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.5066/P13M7JPQ",
+ "description": "Landing page for access to the data",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "application/http",
+ "title": "Digital Data"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "description": "The metadata original format",
+ "downloadURL": "https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.5818c1dfe4b0bb36a4c8806e.xml",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "Original Metadata"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_5818c1dfe4b0bb36a4c8806e",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Idaho",
+ "Oregon",
+ "USGS:5818c1dfe4b0bb36a4c8806e",
+ "Washington",
+ "adaptive management",
+ "climate change",
+ "datasets",
+ "decision support methods",
+ "environment",
+ "external research support",
+ "fire",
+ "fire management",
+ "fires",
+ "management methods",
+ "natural resource management"
+ ],
+ "modified": "2026-09-29T00:00:00Z",
+ "publisher": {
+ "@type": "org:Organization",
+ "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"
+ },
+ "spatial": "-124.6289, 41.8368, -111.0059, 48.9225",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Catalog of Fire-Related Climate Adaptation Actions: Phase 3 Literature Review"
+ },
+ "description": "Management actions may have a higher probability of being successful if they are informed by available scientific knowledge and findings; a systematic review process provides a mechanism to scientifically assess management questions. By evaluating specific actions on scientific knowledge and findings, we may be able to increase management effectiveness and efficiency. The goal of the Available Science Assessment Project (ASAP) is to synthesize and evaluate the body of scientific knowledge on specific, on-the-ground CAAs to determine the conditions, timeframes, and geographic areas where particular CAAs may be most effective for resource managers. We have derived a methodology that utilizes interviews, a systematic review process, and extensive engagement with natural resource managers and scientists throughout the Northwest Climate Science Center (NW CSC) region. For a test case, we will evaluate the science behind specific fire management actions in national forests in the region.",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "Digital Data",
+ "Original Metadata"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/d45168a7-3e0c-4ab2-9b97-dc001f1f6782",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/d45168a7-3e0c-4ab2-9b97-dc001f1f6782/raw",
+ "has_download": true,
+ "has_spatial": true,
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_5818c1dfe4b0bb36a4c8806e",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Idaho",
+ "Oregon",
+ "USGS:5818c1dfe4b0bb36a4c8806e",
+ "Washington",
+ "adaptive management",
+ "climate change",
+ "datasets",
+ "decision support methods",
+ "environment",
+ "external research support",
+ "fire",
+ "fire management",
+ "fires",
+ "management methods",
+ "natural resource management"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-10-02T02:55:47.668877",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png",
+ "name": "Department of the Interior",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "doi"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 0,
+ "publisher": "U.S. Geological Survey",
+ "slug": "catalog-of-fire-related-climate-adaptation-actions-phase-3-literature-review",
+ "spatial_centroid": {
+ "lat": 44.671079999999996,
+ "lon": -119.1797
+ },
+ "spatial_shape": {
+ "coordinates": [
+ [
+ [
+ -124.6289,
+ 41.8368
+ ],
+ [
+ -124.6289,
+ 48.9225
+ ],
+ [
+ -111.0059,
+ 48.9225
+ ],
+ [
+ -111.0059,
+ 41.8368
+ ],
+ [
+ -124.6289,
+ 41.8368
+ ]
+ ]
+ ],
+ "type": "Polygon"
+ },
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Catalog of Fire-Related Climate Adaptation Actions: Phase 3 Literature Review",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 9.492239,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790909745052,
+ 9.492239,
+ 1,
+ "6e2af744-12f0-4d8e-acd5-d3a78e320b19"
+ ],
+ "access_level": "public",
+ "dcat": {
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "010:12"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "@type": "vcard:Contact",
+ "fn": "Amanda W Demopoulos",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:ademopoulos@usgs.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "Stable isotope dataset from fauna, particulate organic matter (POM) and sediments used to construct isotopic niches to compare trophic relationships in mesophotic coral habitats across the Gulf of America as part of the Connectivity of Coral Ecosystems in the Northwestern Gulf of Mexico (CYCLE) project.",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.5066/P1LBISVQ",
+ "description": "Landing page for access to the data",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "application/http",
+ "title": "Digital Data"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "description": "The metadata original format",
+ "downloadURL": "https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.68d15fecd4be0272b1b25869.xml",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "Original Metadata"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_68d15fecd4be0272b1b25869",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Flower Garden Banks",
+ "Gulf of America",
+ "USGS:68d15fecd4be0272b1b25869",
+ "biota",
+ "ecological competition",
+ "ecology",
+ "environment",
+ "food web",
+ "oceans",
+ "stable isotope analysis"
+ ],
+ "modified": "2026-09-29T00:00:00Z",
+ "publisher": {
+ "@type": "org:Organization",
+ "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"
+ },
+ "spatial": "-95.5790, 27.8170, -87.5740, 29.4480",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Stable isotope data for fauna, POM and sediments at 19 mesophotic coral habitats in the Gulf of America"
+ },
+ "description": "Stable isotope dataset from fauna, particulate organic matter (POM) and sediments used to construct isotopic niches to compare trophic relationships in mesophotic coral habitats across the Gulf of America as part of the Connectivity of Coral Ecosystems in the Northwestern Gulf of Mexico (CYCLE) project.",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "Digital Data",
+ "Original Metadata"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/e5ab245b-3c01-482b-8677-f4c80d59bec2",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/e5ab245b-3c01-482b-8677-f4c80d59bec2/raw",
+ "has_download": true,
+ "has_spatial": true,
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_68d15fecd4be0272b1b25869",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Flower Garden Banks",
+ "Gulf of America",
+ "USGS:68d15fecd4be0272b1b25869",
+ "biota",
+ "ecological competition",
+ "ecology",
+ "environment",
+ "food web",
+ "oceans",
+ "stable isotope analysis"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-10-02T02:55:45.052348",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png",
+ "name": "Department of the Interior",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "doi"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 1,
+ "publisher": "U.S. Geological Survey",
+ "slug": "stable-isotope-data-for-fauna-pom-and-sediments-at-19-mesophotic-coral-habitats-in-the-gul",
+ "spatial_centroid": {
+ "lat": 28.4694,
+ "lon": -92.377
+ },
+ "spatial_shape": {
+ "coordinates": [
+ [
+ [
+ -95.579,
+ 27.817
+ ],
+ [
+ -95.579,
+ 29.448
+ ],
+ [
+ -87.574,
+ 29.448
+ ],
+ [
+ -87.574,
+ 27.817
+ ],
+ [
+ -95.579,
+ 27.817
+ ]
+ ]
+ ],
+ "type": "Polygon"
+ },
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Stable isotope data for fauna, POM and sediments at 19 mesophotic coral habitats in the Gulf of America",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 10.201826,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790909697833,
+ 10.201826,
+ 0,
+ "639c53dd-3e45-465f-a57d-c867304b9c89"
+ ],
+ "access_level": "public",
+ "dcat": {
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "010:12"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "@type": "vcard:Contact",
+ "fn": "FRESC Science Data Coordinator",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:fresc_outreach@usgs.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "This dataset contains observations used to better understand wildlife and domestic livestock use of wildfire sites 2-15 years post-wildfire with different post-fire restoration treatments (post-fire seeding of native or non-native species). Field data come from 9 wildfire sites in the Northern Basin and Range Ecoregion spanning Idaho and Oregon. Vegetation structure and composition measurements were collected at 222 plots, and wildlife pellet surveys were conducted at these plots. Treatment groups related to wildfire (burned vs. unburned) and post-fire seeding (native seeding, non-native seeding, no seeding) were derived using GIS.",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.5066/P13PFTGT",
+ "description": "Landing page for access to the data",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "application/http",
+ "title": "Digital Data"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "description": "The metadata original format",
+ "downloadURL": "https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.6a8f5a1e1ba49b52aa274174.xml",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "Original Metadata"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6a8f5a1e1ba49b52aa274174",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Idaho",
+ "Oregon",
+ "USGS:6a8f5a1e1ba49b52aa274174",
+ "biota",
+ "environment",
+ "natural resource management",
+ "wildfires",
+ "wildlife"
+ ],
+ "modified": "2026-09-29T00:00:00Z",
+ "publisher": {
+ "@type": "org:Organization",
+ "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"
+ },
+ "spatial": "-119.4653, 41.9513, -114.7852, 44.7779",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Wildlife pellet and vegetation survey data to evaluate outcomes of wildfire and post-fire restoration treatments in the Northern Basin and Range Ecoregion, 2008-2009"
+ },
+ "description": "This dataset contains observations used to better understand wildlife and domestic livestock use of wildfire sites 2-15 years post-wildfire with different post-fire restoration treatments (post-fire seeding of native or non-native species). Field data come from 9 wildfire sites in the Northern Basin and Range Ecoregion spanning Idaho and Oregon. Vegetation structure and composition measurements were collected at 222 plots, and wildlife pellet surveys were conducted at these plots. Treatment groups related to wildfire (burned vs. unburned) and post-fire seeding (native seeding, non-native seeding, no seeding) were derived using GIS.",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "Digital Data",
+ "Original Metadata"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/55b63838-9b60-4d26-b5af-8e8673f1c383",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/55b63838-9b60-4d26-b5af-8e8673f1c383/raw",
+ "has_download": true,
+ "has_spatial": true,
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6a8f5a1e1ba49b52aa274174",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Idaho",
+ "Oregon",
+ "USGS:6a8f5a1e1ba49b52aa274174",
+ "biota",
+ "environment",
+ "natural resource management",
+ "wildfires",
+ "wildlife"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-10-02T02:54:57.833187",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png",
+ "name": "Department of the Interior",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "doi"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 0,
+ "publisher": "U.S. Geological Survey",
+ "slug": "wildlife-pellet-and-vegetation-survey-data-to-evaluate-outcomes-of-wildfire-and--2008-2009",
+ "spatial_centroid": {
+ "lat": 43.08194,
+ "lon": -117.59326000000001
+ },
+ "spatial_shape": {
+ "coordinates": [
+ [
+ [
+ -119.4653,
+ 41.9513
+ ],
+ [
+ -119.4653,
+ 44.7779
+ ],
+ [
+ -114.7852,
+ 44.7779
+ ],
+ [
+ -114.7852,
+ 41.9513
+ ],
+ [
+ -119.4653,
+ 41.9513
+ ]
+ ]
+ ],
+ "type": "Polygon"
+ },
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Wildlife pellet and vegetation survey data to evaluate outcomes of wildfire and post-fire restoration treatments in the Northern Basin and Range Ecoregion, 2008-2009",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 9.183598,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790909497596,
+ 9.183598,
+ 0,
+ "97455187-658c-4c1e-8c0b-0e286914ec29"
+ ],
+ "access_level": "public",
+ "dcat": {
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "010:12"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "@type": "vcard:Contact",
+ "fn": "Scott W Anderson",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:swanderson@usgs.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "Hydrophones have been proposed as a potential surrogate for bedload transport, operating on the principle that particle collisions generate sound that scales in intensity with transport rate (for example, Geay and others, 2017). To assess that potential, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) partnered with the Washington Department of Transportation (WSDOT) in 2019 to install hydrophones on three different gravel-bedded rivers in the Pacific Northwest, including Glacier Creek and the Methow River in Washington State and the Big Wood River in Idaho. The hydrophones were designed and built by Matt Marineau, as described in Marineau and others (2016). McBain and Associates conducted concurrent bedload sampling on the Methow River and attempted to do so in the Big Wood River, but no significant transport was detected. No bedload sampling was attempted at Glacier Creek. \nThe hydrophones were then transferred to two sites on the Skagit River, Washington, in the fall of 2021 and operated with support from both WSDOT and Seattle City Light. One site was near the city of Marblemount, and the other was near Illabot Creek. McBain and Associates attempted bedload sampling at the site near Illabot Creek but no significant transport was detected. The USGS then sampled bedload at the Marblemount site several times between May, 2022 and January, 2024. \nSeparately, the USGS installed hydrophones on Vance Creek, Washington in the fall of 2019, to test the technology at a location where bedload sampling was on-going (Anderson, 2022).\nThis data release contains the processed output of the hydrophone monitoring efforts spread across these six sites. The raw outputs of the hydrophones are sequential one-minute stereo audio files, with the two stereo channels containing recordings from two independent hydrophone sensors. Those audio files are not included in this data release. The processed output presented here are CSV summaries of acoustic pressure as a function of frequency, or spectrograms, from each stereo channel of each audio file, organized by monitoring location. Most monitoring locations included two distinct installations, most commonly on opposing banks. At the three sites where bedload data were available (Methow River, Skagit River at Marblemount, and Vance Creek), this data release also includes a summary of those bedload measurements. At all sites, discharge was available either from co-located USGS streamgages, or could be estimated from gage records at nearby locations using simple drainage area scaling. \nAny use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. These data are marked with a Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal (CC0-1.0) public domain dedication and do not have any use constraints.",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.5066/P9XEISWS",
+ "description": "Landing page for access to the data",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "application/http",
+ "title": "Digital Data"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "description": "The metadata original format",
+ "downloadURL": "https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.6424d315d34e370832fec43c.xml",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "Original Metadata"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6424d315d34e370832fec43c",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Big Wood River",
+ "Glacier Creek",
+ "Idaho",
+ "Methow River",
+ "Skagit River",
+ "State of Washington",
+ "USGS:6424d315d34e370832fec43c",
+ "Vance Creek",
+ "acoustic methods",
+ "environment",
+ "sediment transport"
+ ],
+ "modified": "2026-09-29T00:00:00Z",
+ "publisher": {
+ "@type": "org:Organization",
+ "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"
+ },
+ "spatial": "-124.0000, 45.0425, -115.0488, 49.0000",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Hydrophone data from gravel-bedded rivers in Washington and Idaho, 2019 to 2024"
+ },
+ "description": "Hydrophones have been proposed as a potential surrogate for bedload transport, operating on the principle that particle collisions generate sound that scales in intensity with transport rate (for example, Geay and others, 2017). To assess that potential, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) partnered with the Washington Department of Transportation (WSDOT) in 2019 to install hydrophones on three different gravel-bedded rivers in the Pacific Northwest, including Glacier Creek and the Methow River in Washington State and the Big Wood River in Idaho. The hydrophones were designed and built by Matt Marineau, as described in Marineau and others (2016). McBain and Associates conducted concurrent bedload sampling on the Methow River and attempted to do so in the Big Wood River, but no significant transport was detected. No bedload sampling was attempted at Glacier Creek. \nThe hydrophones were then transferred to two sites on the Skagit River, Washington, in the fall of 2021 and operated with support from both WSDOT and Seattle City Light. One site was near the city of Marblemount, and the other was near Illabot Creek. McBain and Associates attempted bedload sampling at the site near Illabot Creek but no significant transport was detected. The USGS then sampled bedload at the Marblemount site several times between May, 2022 and January, 2024. \nSeparately, the USGS installed hydrophones on Vance Creek, Washington in the fall of 2019, to test the technology at a location where bedload sampling was on-going (Anderson, 2022).\nThis data release contains the processed output of the hydrophone monitoring efforts spread across these six sites. The raw outputs of the hydrophones are sequential one-minute stereo audio files, with the two stereo channels containing recordings from two independent hydrophone sensors. Those audio files are not included in this data release. The processed output presented here are CSV summaries of acoustic pressure as a function of frequency, or spectrograms, from each stereo channel of each audio file, organized by monitoring location. Most monitoring locations included two distinct installations, most commonly on opposing banks. At the three sites where bedload data were available (Methow River, Skagit River at Marblemount, and Vance Creek), this data release also includes a summary of those bedload measurements. At all sites, discharge was available either from co-located USGS streamgages, or could be estimated from gage records at nearby locations using simple drainage area scaling. \nAny use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. These data are marked with a Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal (CC0-1.0) public domain dedication and do not have any use constraints.",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "Digital Data",
+ "Original Metadata"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/0a2e4130-2b3e-4ddf-bd43-dc441f42ebb1",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/0a2e4130-2b3e-4ddf-bd43-dc441f42ebb1/raw",
+ "has_download": true,
+ "has_spatial": true,
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6424d315d34e370832fec43c",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Big Wood River",
+ "Glacier Creek",
+ "Idaho",
+ "Methow River",
+ "Skagit River",
+ "State of Washington",
+ "USGS:6424d315d34e370832fec43c",
+ "Vance Creek",
+ "acoustic methods",
+ "environment",
+ "sediment transport"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-10-02T02:51:37.596119",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png",
+ "name": "Department of the Interior",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "doi"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 0,
+ "publisher": "U.S. Geological Survey",
+ "slug": "hydrophone-data-from-gravel-bedded-rivers-in-washington-and-idaho-2019-to-2024",
+ "spatial_centroid": {
+ "lat": 46.6255,
+ "lon": -120.41952
+ },
+ "spatial_shape": {
+ "coordinates": [
+ [
+ [
+ -124.0,
+ 45.0425
+ ],
+ [
+ -124.0,
+ 49.0
+ ],
+ [
+ -115.0488,
+ 49.0
+ ],
+ [
+ -115.0488,
+ 45.0425
+ ],
+ [
+ -124.0,
+ 45.0425
+ ]
+ ]
+ ],
+ "type": "Polygon"
+ },
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Hydrophone data from gravel-bedded rivers in Washington and Idaho, 2019 to 2024",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 10.239944,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790909224091,
+ 10.239944,
+ 1,
+ "ead97d67-db7c-44f3-b3c4-8c89835f1583"
+ ],
+ "access_level": "public",
+ "dcat": {
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "010:12"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "@type": "vcard:Contact",
+ "fn": "Nicholas M Enwright",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:enwrightn@usgs.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "This data release includes 2022 data for the Louisiana Outer Coast Restoration Project for North Breton Island. Specifically, this data release includes a detailed habitat map, general habitat map, georeferenced imagery, and a bare-earth digital elevation model (DEM) developed from light detection and ranging data. These habitat maps are developed using the methods and classification scheme from Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority’s (CPRA) Barrier Island Comprehensive Monitoring (BICM) program. For more details on BICM habitat classes, see the Entity and Attribute Information section of the metadata. Please consult the accompanying readME.txt file for information and recommendations on the contents of this dataset (that is, dataset and recommended symbology). For more information about BICM habitat mapping, see Enwright and others (2020).",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.5066/P9W4SRHQ",
+ "description": "Landing page for access to the data",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "application/http",
+ "title": "Digital Data"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "description": "The metadata original format",
+ "downloadURL": "https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.6552864fd34ee4b6e05c38ea.xml",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "Original Metadata"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6552864fd34ee4b6e05c38ea",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Gulf of America",
+ "Louisiana",
+ "Plaquemines Parish",
+ "USGS:6552864fd34ee4b6e05c38ea",
+ "elevation",
+ "environment",
+ "geoscientificInformation",
+ "imageryBaseMapsEarthCover"
+ ],
+ "modified": "2026-09-29T00:00:00Z",
+ "publisher": {
+ "@type": "org:Organization",
+ "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"
+ },
+ "spatial": "-89.26744, 29.44893, -89.13066, 29.53400",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Louisiana Outer Coast Restoration Project – 2022 habitat map, North Breton Island (ver. 2.0, September 2026)"
+ },
+ "description": "This data release includes 2022 data for the Louisiana Outer Coast Restoration Project for North Breton Island. Specifically, this data release includes a detailed habitat map, general habitat map, georeferenced imagery, and a bare-earth digital elevation model (DEM) developed from light detection and ranging data. These habitat maps are developed using the methods and classification scheme from Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority’s (CPRA) Barrier Island Comprehensive Monitoring (BICM) program. For more details on BICM habitat classes, see the Entity and Attribute Information section of the metadata. Please consult the accompanying readME.txt file for information and recommendations on the contents of this dataset (that is, dataset and recommended symbology). For more information about BICM habitat mapping, see Enwright and others (2020).",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "Digital Data",
+ "Original Metadata"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/f2f189d3-9cf1-4388-80a2-a569497faddc",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/f2f189d3-9cf1-4388-80a2-a569497faddc/raw",
+ "has_download": true,
+ "has_spatial": true,
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6552864fd34ee4b6e05c38ea",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Gulf of America",
+ "Louisiana",
+ "Plaquemines Parish",
+ "USGS:6552864fd34ee4b6e05c38ea",
+ "elevation",
+ "environment",
+ "geoscientificInformation",
+ "imageryBaseMapsEarthCover"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-10-02T02:47:04.091972",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png",
+ "name": "Department of the Interior",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "doi"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 1,
+ "publisher": "U.S. Geological Survey",
+ "slug": "louisiana-outer-coast-restoration-project-2022-habitat-map-north-breton-island",
+ "spatial_centroid": {
+ "lat": 29.482958000000004,
+ "lon": -89.212728
+ },
+ "spatial_shape": {
+ "coordinates": [
+ [
+ [
+ -89.26744,
+ 29.44893
+ ],
+ [
+ -89.26744,
+ 29.534
+ ],
+ [
+ -89.13066,
+ 29.534
+ ],
+ [
+ -89.13066,
+ 29.44893
+ ],
+ [
+ -89.26744,
+ 29.44893
+ ]
+ ]
+ ],
+ "type": "Polygon"
+ },
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Louisiana Outer Coast Restoration Project – 2022 habitat map, North Breton Island (ver. 2.0, September 2026)",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 9.599783,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790909176034,
+ 9.599783,
+ 0,
+ "438bc2c4-fbe1-4212-b3ba-43664e7ebc78"
+ ],
+ "access_level": "public",
+ "dcat": {
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "010:12"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "@type": "vcard:Contact",
+ "fn": "Richard D. Inman",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:rdinman@usgs.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "This data release contains the spatial raster outputs from analyses of habitat suitability of the New Mexico ridge-nosed rattlesnake (NMRR), Crotalus willardi obscurus. This species is one of five recognized of the ridge-nosed rattlesnakes and was federally listed as threatened in 1978 due primarily to perceived threats of over collection and a very narrowly restricted range. This range is now known to include only three isolated populations: the Animas Mountains of New Mexico, the Peloncillo Mountains of New Mexico and Arizona, and the Sierra San Luis Mountains in Mexico. Included here are spatial data: 1) the mean habitat suitability (expressed as a numerical value from 0 to 100), 2) the study area boundary used to model habitat, and 3) the environmental covariates used to model habitat. We developed an ensemble weighted habitat suitability model to create predictions of habitat potential across each of the three sky island mountain complexes using habitat suitability modeling (HSM), a quantitative modeling approach that relates locations of species observations to environmental covariates shown to influence or define habitat suitability (Franklin 2010). We used an ensemble approach with five algorithms with WISDM: Workbench for Integrated Species Distribution Modeling (version 2.5.0, Daniel et al. 2026) using a presence-background modeling approach. Presence-background modeling compares environmental conditions at locations where a species has been observed (in this case locations where snakes were captured by field crews) to environmental conditions across a study area (background). Background environmental conditions were represented with a suite of raster data hypothesized to influence habitat suitability. These raster data represented average conditions between the years 2021 and 2024 across the study area. Locations where NMRR have been observed were obtained from a long-term capture-recapture dataset of the entire snake community across the NMRR range that is the result of ongoing investment by a diverse group of 11 funding partners, including federal, state and private entities.\nThis data release includes:\n1) 'landing_page_metadata.xml' (this file) which contains the project-level metadata.\n2) 'habitat_suitability.zip' which contains the geotiff file with habitat suitability values, the shapefile used as the study area boundary and habitat_suitability_metadata.xml\n3) 'covariates.zip' which contains the geotiff files used as environmental covariates for habitat suitability modeling and covariates_metadata.xml\n4) 'model-info.zip' which contains text files and figures with information about model calibration and model-info_metadata.xml\nCitations:\nDaniel, C., Engelstad, P., Miller, B., and; Morisette, J. 2026. WISDM: Workbench for Integrated Species Distribution Modeling (Version 2.5.0) [Software package]. ApexRMS. Retrieved from WISDM Package GitHub:https://github.com/ApexRMS/wisdm/\nFranklin J. Mapping Species Distributions: Spatial Inference and Prediction. Cambridge University Press; 2010.",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.5066/P1Y2JN38",
+ "description": "Landing page for access to the data",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "application/http",
+ "title": "Digital Data"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "description": "The metadata original format",
+ "downloadURL": "https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.6a3351b41ba49b742637d5a5.xml",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "Original Metadata"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6a3351b41ba49b742637d5a5",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Arizona",
+ "Mexico",
+ "New Mexico",
+ "Species Distribution Modeling",
+ "USGS:6a3351b41ba49b742637d5a5",
+ "biogeography",
+ "biota",
+ "environment",
+ "habitat suitability",
+ "habitats",
+ "rattlesnake",
+ "reptiles"
+ ],
+ "modified": "2026-09-29T00:00:00Z",
+ "publisher": {
+ "@type": "org:Organization",
+ "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"
+ },
+ "spatial": "-109.2744, 30.8107, -108.5561, 31.6716",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Habitat suitability and environmental covariates for the New Mexico ridge-nosed rattlesnake (Crotalus willardi obscurus)"
+ },
+ "description": "This data release contains the spatial raster outputs from analyses of habitat suitability of the New Mexico ridge-nosed rattlesnake (NMRR), Crotalus willardi obscurus. This species is one of five recognized of the ridge-nosed rattlesnakes and was federally listed as threatened in 1978 due primarily to perceived threats of over collection and a very narrowly restricted range. This range is now known to include only three isolated populations: the Animas Mountains of New Mexico, the Peloncillo Mountains of New Mexico and Arizona, and the Sierra San Luis Mountains in Mexico. Included here are spatial data: 1) the mean habitat suitability (expressed as a numerical value from 0 to 100), 2) the study area boundary used to model habitat, and 3) the environmental covariates used to model habitat. We developed an ensemble weighted habitat suitability model to create predictions of habitat potential across each of the three sky island mountain complexes using habitat suitability modeling (HSM), a quantitative modeling approach that relates locations of species observations to environmental covariates shown to influence or define habitat suitability (Franklin 2010). We used an ensemble approach with five algorithms with WISDM: Workbench for Integrated Species Distribution Modeling (version 2.5.0, Daniel et al. 2026) using a presence-background modeling approach. Presence-background modeling compares environmental conditions at locations where a species has been observed (in this case locations where snakes were captured by field crews) to environmental conditions across a study area (background). Background environmental conditions were represented with a suite of raster data hypothesized to influence habitat suitability. These raster data represented average conditions between the years 2021 and 2024 across the study area. Locations where NMRR have been observed were obtained from a long-term capture-recapture dataset of the entire snake community across the NMRR range that is the result of ongoing investment by a diverse group of 11 funding partners, including federal, state and private entities.\nThis data release includes:\n1) 'landing_page_metadata.xml' (this file) which contains the project-level metadata.\n2) 'habitat_suitability.zip' which contains the geotiff file with habitat suitability values, the shapefile used as the study area boundary and habitat_suitability_metadata.xml\n3) 'covariates.zip' which contains the geotiff files used as environmental covariates for habitat suitability modeling and covariates_metadata.xml\n4) 'model-info.zip' which contains text files and figures with information about model calibration and model-info_metadata.xml\nCitations:\nDaniel, C., Engelstad, P., Miller, B., and; Morisette, J. 2026. WISDM: Workbench for Integrated Species Distribution Modeling (Version 2.5.0) [Software package]. ApexRMS. Retrieved from WISDM Package GitHub:https://github.com/ApexRMS/wisdm/\nFranklin J. Mapping Species Distributions: Spatial Inference and Prediction. Cambridge University Press; 2010.",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "Digital Data",
+ "Original Metadata"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/35776613-f503-4e2a-a920-01ad129c1868",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/35776613-f503-4e2a-a920-01ad129c1868/raw",
+ "has_download": true,
+ "has_spatial": true,
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6a3351b41ba49b742637d5a5",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Arizona",
+ "Mexico",
+ "New Mexico",
+ "Species Distribution Modeling",
+ "USGS:6a3351b41ba49b742637d5a5",
+ "biogeography",
+ "biota",
+ "environment",
+ "habitat suitability",
+ "habitats",
+ "rattlesnake",
+ "reptiles"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-10-02T02:46:16.034193",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png",
+ "name": "Department of the Interior",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "doi"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 0,
+ "publisher": "U.S. Geological Survey",
+ "slug": "habitat-suitability-and-environmental-covariates-for-the-new-mexico-ridge-nosed-rattlesnak",
+ "spatial_centroid": {
+ "lat": 31.155060000000002,
+ "lon": -108.98707999999999
+ },
+ "spatial_shape": {
+ "coordinates": [
+ [
+ [
+ -109.2744,
+ 30.8107
+ ],
+ [
+ -109.2744,
+ 31.6716
+ ],
+ [
+ -108.5561,
+ 31.6716
+ ],
+ [
+ -108.5561,
+ 30.8107
+ ],
+ [
+ -109.2744,
+ 30.8107
+ ]
+ ]
+ ],
+ "type": "Polygon"
+ },
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Habitat suitability and environmental covariates for the New Mexico ridge-nosed rattlesnake (Crotalus willardi obscurus)",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 10.239944,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790908510569,
+ 10.239944,
+ 0,
+ "8016a252-6dd5-461b-9812-99801b6050cf"
+ ],
+ "access_level": "public",
+ "dcat": {
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "010:12"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "@type": "vcard:Contact",
+ "fn": "Scott W Anderson",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:swanderson@usgs.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "Hydrophones were installed on the Methow River just downstream of the Community Bridge on the Methow Valley Trail and operated during the spring of 2020. Two independent acoustic recording units were installed, one on each bank, with two hydrophone sensors linked to each unit. The right-bank installation was located near the bottom of a steep eroding gravel bank, while the left-bank installation was placed on a low-relief cobble bar. Both units collected 15-minute data from April 24 to June 05, 2020, spanning the spring snowmelt peak flow. No obvious issues were observed in preliminary inspections of the data.\nMcBain and Associates conducted bedload sampling at the monitoring site from May 18 to May 20, 2020. Sampling was performed from a cataraft tethered to a channel-spanning cableway, using a Toutle River II bedload sampler. A total of 19 transects were collected over three sampling days. Those data were archived on the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) NWIS repository under site number 483414120220801 (Methow River below Trail Bridge near Mazama, WA). Discharge at the site was estimated from USGS streamgage 12447383 (Methow River above Goat Creek near Mazama, WA), located about two kilometers upstream. Discharge records were scaled by the drainage area ratio of the hydrophone monitoring site and the streamgage site, which was 1.12. \nEach hydrophone unit consisted of custom-built controller and recording system to which one or two distinct hydrophone sensors were attached (Marineau and others, 2016). The controller/recording unit consisted of a Raspberry Pi Zero W using a UUGear Witty Pi 4 real-time clock for time information. These systems used H2a-XLR hydrophones (Aquarian Audio, 2024). Each hydrophone was installed in 0.75-inch 90-degree polyvinyl chloride (PVC) street elbows connected to 0.75-inch non-metallic conduit and affixed to the bed during low-flow conditions using rebar pounded into the gravel substrate and a combination of metal hose clamps and nylon zip ties. The two hydrophones were installed several feet apart with sensors facing towards the center of the channel. Hydrophones were connected to the controller through ART ProAudio Dual Pre Project Series preamplifier with gain set to 10 decibels. When operating, the system would record one-minute 16-bit stereo audio files with a 44.1 kilohertz sampling rate at 15-minute intervals. Audio was recorded in Waveform Audio File (WAV) format and then compressed to Free Lossless Audio Codec (FLAC) format for local storage. \nRaw audio files were processed in R to obtain average acoustic pressure in micropascals as a function of frequency based on methods discussed in Geay and others (2017). The primary processing tool was the specgram function from the Signal (2023) R package, which applies a Fourier transform to sequential slices of individual audio files to obtain a table of frequency response over time. Processing was done using a Hamming window, dividing the file into 2048 sub-intervals with 50 percent overlap. The output was normalized based on the dynamic range (2.5) and sensitivity (-180 decibels) of the hydrophones and gain of the pre-amplifier (10 decibels) to obtain results in micropascals. The result is a table describing acoustic pressure by frequency at equal 21.5 Hz intervals between 0 and 22 kHz for each of the 2048 time sub-intervals. Final output was then summarized as the median value for each frequency. This process was done for each channel of the stereo audio files separately. \nAny use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. These data are marked with a Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal (CC0-1.0) public domain dedication and do not have any use constraints.",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.5066/P9XEISWS",
+ "description": "Landing page for access to the data",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "application/http",
+ "title": "Digital Data"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "description": "The metadata original format",
+ "downloadURL": "https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.6463f9d1d34ec179a83d30b8.xml",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "Original Metadata"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6463f9d1d34ec179a83d30b8",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Methow River",
+ "State of Washington",
+ "USGS:6463f9d1d34ec179a83d30b8",
+ "acoustic methods",
+ "environment",
+ "sediment transport"
+ ],
+ "modified": "2026-09-29T00:00:00Z",
+ "publisher": {
+ "@type": "org:Organization",
+ "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"
+ },
+ "spatial": "-120.371532, 48.568770, -120.366383, 48.572234",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Hydrophone data from the Methow River, Washington, April 2020 to June 2020"
+ },
+ "description": "Hydrophones were installed on the Methow River just downstream of the Community Bridge on the Methow Valley Trail and operated during the spring of 2020. Two independent acoustic recording units were installed, one on each bank, with two hydrophone sensors linked to each unit. The right-bank installation was located near the bottom of a steep eroding gravel bank, while the left-bank installation was placed on a low-relief cobble bar. Both units collected 15-minute data from April 24 to June 05, 2020, spanning the spring snowmelt peak flow. No obvious issues were observed in preliminary inspections of the data.\nMcBain and Associates conducted bedload sampling at the monitoring site from May 18 to May 20, 2020. Sampling was performed from a cataraft tethered to a channel-spanning cableway, using a Toutle River II bedload sampler. A total of 19 transects were collected over three sampling days. Those data were archived on the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) NWIS repository under site number 483414120220801 (Methow River below Trail Bridge near Mazama, WA). Discharge at the site was estimated from USGS streamgage 12447383 (Methow River above Goat Creek near Mazama, WA), located about two kilometers upstream. Discharge records were scaled by the drainage area ratio of the hydrophone monitoring site and the streamgage site, which was 1.12. \nEach hydrophone unit consisted of custom-built controller and recording system to which one or two distinct hydrophone sensors were attached (Marineau and others, 2016). The controller/recording unit consisted of a Raspberry Pi Zero W using a UUGear Witty Pi 4 real-time clock for time information. These systems used H2a-XLR hydrophones (Aquarian Audio, 2024). Each hydrophone was installed in 0.75-inch 90-degree polyvinyl chloride (PVC) street elbows connected to 0.75-inch non-metallic conduit and affixed to the bed during low-flow conditions using rebar pounded into the gravel substrate and a combination of metal hose clamps and nylon zip ties. The two hydrophones were installed several feet apart with sensors facing towards the center of the channel. Hydrophones were connected to the controller through ART ProAudio Dual Pre Project Series preamplifier with gain set to 10 decibels. When operating, the system would record one-minute 16-bit stereo audio files with a 44.1 kilohertz sampling rate at 15-minute intervals. Audio was recorded in Waveform Audio File (WAV) format and then compressed to Free Lossless Audio Codec (FLAC) format for local storage. \nRaw audio files were processed in R to obtain average acoustic pressure in micropascals as a function of frequency based on methods discussed in Geay and others (2017). The primary processing tool was the specgram function from the Signal (2023) R package, which applies a Fourier transform to sequential slices of individual audio files to obtain a table of frequency response over time. Processing was done using a Hamming window, dividing the file into 2048 sub-intervals with 50 percent overlap. The output was normalized based on the dynamic range (2.5) and sensitivity (-180 decibels) of the hydrophones and gain of the pre-amplifier (10 decibels) to obtain results in micropascals. The result is a table describing acoustic pressure by frequency at equal 21.5 Hz intervals between 0 and 22 kHz for each of the 2048 time sub-intervals. Final output was then summarized as the median value for each frequency. This process was done for each channel of the stereo audio files separately. \nAny use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. These data are marked with a Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal (CC0-1.0) public domain dedication and do not have any use constraints.",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "Digital Data",
+ "Original Metadata"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/543466bf-c6a0-4df3-ab5f-ff8b17f1a76c",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/543466bf-c6a0-4df3-ab5f-ff8b17f1a76c/raw",
+ "has_download": true,
+ "has_spatial": true,
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6463f9d1d34ec179a83d30b8",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Methow River",
+ "State of Washington",
+ "USGS:6463f9d1d34ec179a83d30b8",
+ "acoustic methods",
+ "environment",
+ "sediment transport"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-10-02T02:35:10.569364",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png",
+ "name": "Department of the Interior",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "doi"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 0,
+ "publisher": "U.S. Geological Survey",
+ "slug": "hydrophone-data-from-the-methow-river-washington-april-2020-to-june-2020",
+ "spatial_centroid": {
+ "lat": 48.5701556,
+ "lon": -120.36947239999999
+ },
+ "spatial_shape": {
+ "coordinates": [
+ [
+ [
+ -120.371532,
+ 48.56877
+ ],
+ [
+ -120.371532,
+ 48.572234
+ ],
+ [
+ -120.366383,
+ 48.572234
+ ],
+ [
+ -120.366383,
+ 48.56877
+ ],
+ [
+ -120.371532,
+ 48.56877
+ ]
+ ]
+ ],
+ "type": "Polygon"
+ },
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Hydrophone data from the Methow River, Washington, April 2020 to June 2020",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 10.248764,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790908319289,
+ 10.248764,
+ 0,
+ "1fd5d314-a299-4f5b-aee8-62b2eaca3c2b"
+ ],
+ "access_level": "public",
+ "dcat": {
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "010:12"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "@type": "vcard:Contact",
+ "fn": "Scott W Anderson",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:swanderson@usgs.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "Hydrophones were installed on Vance Creek at the West Skokomish Valley Road bridge in early November 2019 and operated through February 2020. Two independent acoustic recording units were installed, one on each bank. The right-bank installation was fixed to bouldery riprap under the bridge, and included two hydrophone sensors. The left-bank installation was located about 100 meters downstream of the bridge, at the base of a steep gravel bank, and only had one hydrophone sensor attached. The units were programmed to collect one-minute audio files at 15-minute interval, but switched to one-minute interval recordings (essentially continuous) during bedload sampling days. Due to a mix of power and clock issues, 15-minute data were only collected through January 7, 2020 at the right-bank site and through December 13, 2019 at the left-bank site, such that the majority of available data consists of the one-minute interval audio collected during sampling days. \nStarting in January 2020, the clock on the right-bank unit ceased to advance when the unit was set to record at 15-minute intervals, but advanced as expected when set to record at one-minute intervals. The resulting date-time stamps associated with the one-minute interval audio files then accurately recorded the relative change in time between recordings, but were systematically shifted from the actual date and time. On bedload sampling days, the time at which that unit was switched to one-minute recording and when it was returned to 15-minute mode was noted in field sheets. Those noted start and end times were used to shift raw recorded date-time stamps in the audio files to their correct values. \nThe U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) conducted bedload sampling at the site during the hydrophone monitoring period, collecting 28 samples over four sampling days. Additional measurements, made prior to installation of the hydrophones, are also available and summarized in Anderson (2022). Discharge at the site was provided by USGS streamgage 12061250 (Vance Creek above Kirkland Creek near Potlach, WA), colocated with the hydrophone monitoring site. \nEach hydrophone unit consisted of custom-built controller and recording system to which one or two distinct hydrophone sensors were attached (Marineau and others, 2016). The controller/recording unit consisted of a Raspberry Pi Zero W using a UUGear Witty Pi 4 real-time clock for time information. These systems used H2a-XLR hydrophones (Aquarian Audio, 2024). Each hydrophone was installed in 0.75-inch 90-degree polyvinyl chloride (PVC) street elbows connected to 0.75-inch non-metallic conduit and affixed to the bed during low-flow conditions using rebar pounded into the gravel substrate and a combination of metal hose clamps and nylon zip ties. The two hydrophones were installed several feet apart with sensors facing towards the center of the channel. Hydrophones were connected to the controller through ART ProAudio Dual Pre Project Series preamplifier with gain set to 10 decibels. When operating, the system would record one-minute 16-bit stereo audio files with a 44.1 kilohertz sampling rate at either one-minute or15-minute intervals, user selected. Audio was recorded in Waveform Audio File (WAV) format and then compressed to Free Lossless Audio Codec (FLAC) format for local storage. \nRaw audio files were processed in R to obtain average acoustic pressure in micropascals as a function of frequency based on methods discussed in Geay and others (2017). The primary processing tool was the specgram function from the Signal (2023) R package, which applies a Fourier transform to sequential slices of individual audio files to obtain a table of frequency response over time. Processing was done using a Hamming window, dividing the file into 2048 sub-intervals with 50 percent overlap. The output was normalized based on the dynamic range (2.5) and sensitivity (-180 decibels) of the hydrophones and gain of the pre-amplifier (10 decibels) to obtain results in micropascals. The result is a table describing acoustic pressure by frequency at equal 21.5 Hz intervals between 0 and 22 kHz for each of the 2048 time sub-intervals. Final output was then summarized as the median value for each frequency. This process was done for each channel of the stereo audio files separately. \nAny use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. These data are marked with a Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal (CC0-1.0) public domain dedication and do not have any use constraints.",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.5066/P9XEISWS",
+ "description": "Landing page for access to the data",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "application/http",
+ "title": "Digital Data"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "description": "The metadata original format",
+ "downloadURL": "https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.6463f9afd34ec179a83d30b6.xml",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "Original Metadata"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6463f9afd34ec179a83d30b6",
+ "keyword": [
+ "State of Washington",
+ "USGS:6463f9afd34ec179a83d30b6",
+ "Vance Creek",
+ "acoustic methods",
+ "environment",
+ "sediment transport"
+ ],
+ "modified": "2026-09-29T00:00:00Z",
+ "publisher": {
+ "@type": "org:Organization",
+ "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"
+ },
+ "spatial": "-123.286718, 47.321596, -123.285431, 47.322840",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Hydrophone data from Vance Creek, Washington, November 2019 to February 2020"
+ },
+ "description": "Hydrophones were installed on Vance Creek at the West Skokomish Valley Road bridge in early November 2019 and operated through February 2020. Two independent acoustic recording units were installed, one on each bank. The right-bank installation was fixed to bouldery riprap under the bridge, and included two hydrophone sensors. The left-bank installation was located about 100 meters downstream of the bridge, at the base of a steep gravel bank, and only had one hydrophone sensor attached. The units were programmed to collect one-minute audio files at 15-minute interval, but switched to one-minute interval recordings (essentially continuous) during bedload sampling days. Due to a mix of power and clock issues, 15-minute data were only collected through January 7, 2020 at the right-bank site and through December 13, 2019 at the left-bank site, such that the majority of available data consists of the one-minute interval audio collected during sampling days. \nStarting in January 2020, the clock on the right-bank unit ceased to advance when the unit was set to record at 15-minute intervals, but advanced as expected when set to record at one-minute intervals. The resulting date-time stamps associated with the one-minute interval audio files then accurately recorded the relative change in time between recordings, but were systematically shifted from the actual date and time. On bedload sampling days, the time at which that unit was switched to one-minute recording and when it was returned to 15-minute mode was noted in field sheets. Those noted start and end times were used to shift raw recorded date-time stamps in the audio files to their correct values. \nThe U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) conducted bedload sampling at the site during the hydrophone monitoring period, collecting 28 samples over four sampling days. Additional measurements, made prior to installation of the hydrophones, are also available and summarized in Anderson (2022). Discharge at the site was provided by USGS streamgage 12061250 (Vance Creek above Kirkland Creek near Potlach, WA), colocated with the hydrophone monitoring site. \nEach hydrophone unit consisted of custom-built controller and recording system to which one or two distinct hydrophone sensors were attached (Marineau and others, 2016). The controller/recording unit consisted of a Raspberry Pi Zero W using a UUGear Witty Pi 4 real-time clock for time information. These systems used H2a-XLR hydrophones (Aquarian Audio, 2024). Each hydrophone was installed in 0.75-inch 90-degree polyvinyl chloride (PVC) street elbows connected to 0.75-inch non-metallic conduit and affixed to the bed during low-flow conditions using rebar pounded into the gravel substrate and a combination of metal hose clamps and nylon zip ties. The two hydrophones were installed several feet apart with sensors facing towards the center of the channel. Hydrophones were connected to the controller through ART ProAudio Dual Pre Project Series preamplifier with gain set to 10 decibels. When operating, the system would record one-minute 16-bit stereo audio files with a 44.1 kilohertz sampling rate at either one-minute or15-minute intervals, user selected. Audio was recorded in Waveform Audio File (WAV) format and then compressed to Free Lossless Audio Codec (FLAC) format for local storage. \nRaw audio files were processed in R to obtain average acoustic pressure in micropascals as a function of frequency based on methods discussed in Geay and others (2017). The primary processing tool was the specgram function from the Signal (2023) R package, which applies a Fourier transform to sequential slices of individual audio files to obtain a table of frequency response over time. Processing was done using a Hamming window, dividing the file into 2048 sub-intervals with 50 percent overlap. The output was normalized based on the dynamic range (2.5) and sensitivity (-180 decibels) of the hydrophones and gain of the pre-amplifier (10 decibels) to obtain results in micropascals. The result is a table describing acoustic pressure by frequency at equal 21.5 Hz intervals between 0 and 22 kHz for each of the 2048 time sub-intervals. Final output was then summarized as the median value for each frequency. This process was done for each channel of the stereo audio files separately. \nAny use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. These data are marked with a Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal (CC0-1.0) public domain dedication and do not have any use constraints.",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "Digital Data",
+ "Original Metadata"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/7fb2c924-696e-4151-8459-8d96a58c2b08",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/7fb2c924-696e-4151-8459-8d96a58c2b08/raw",
+ "has_download": true,
+ "has_spatial": true,
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6463f9afd34ec179a83d30b6",
+ "keyword": [
+ "State of Washington",
+ "USGS:6463f9afd34ec179a83d30b6",
+ "Vance Creek",
+ "acoustic methods",
+ "environment",
+ "sediment transport"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-10-02T02:31:59.289452",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png",
+ "name": "Department of the Interior",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "doi"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 0,
+ "publisher": "U.S. Geological Survey",
+ "slug": "hydrophone-data-from-vance-creek-washington-november-2019-to-february-2020",
+ "spatial_centroid": {
+ "lat": 47.3220936,
+ "lon": -123.2862032
+ },
+ "spatial_shape": {
+ "coordinates": [
+ [
+ [
+ -123.286718,
+ 47.321596
+ ],
+ [
+ -123.286718,
+ 47.32284
+ ],
+ [
+ -123.285431,
+ 47.32284
+ ],
+ [
+ -123.285431,
+ 47.321596
+ ],
+ [
+ -123.286718,
+ 47.321596
+ ]
+ ]
+ ],
+ "type": "Polygon"
+ },
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Hydrophone data from Vance Creek, Washington, November 2019 to February 2020",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 10.248764,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790907933507,
+ 10.248764,
+ 0,
+ "a3f3612c-39da-4c95-87d7-f68c53dc9e12"
+ ],
+ "access_level": "public",
+ "dcat": {
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "010:12"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "@type": "vcard:Contact",
+ "fn": "Scott W Anderson",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:swanderson@usgs.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "Hydrophones were installed on lower Glacier Creek, Washington, and run between June 2019 and June 2020. Two units were installed at or near the state highway 542 (Mt. Baker Highway) Bridge; one on the right bank, directly under the bridge, and one on the left bank, fixed to a boulder about 100 meters upstream. The left-bank unit collected data from June 18, 2019 through June 14, 2020, with significant gaps in late summer and fall of 2019 and Spring of 2020. Recordings from the left bank contain substantial water noise and are considered unlikely to represent sediment movement. The right-bank unit experienced significant issues with power and data recording, such that data were only available from April 30, 2020 through June 25, 2020. The lower hydrophone sensor on the right-bank unit exhibited little variation in acoustic pressure over time, likely due to a connection or recording issue in the system. No bedload sampling was attempted at this site. Stage and discharge records are available from U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) streamgage 12205245 (Glacier Creek below Thompson Creek at Glacier, WA). \nEach hydrophone unit consisted of custom-built controller and recording system to which one or two distinct hydrophone sensors were attached. The controller/recording unit consisted of a Raspberry Pi Zero W using a UUGear Witty Pi 4 real-time clock for time information. These systems used H2a-XLR hydrophones (Aquarian, 2024). Each hydrophone was installed in 0.75-inch 90-degree polyvinyl chloride (PVC) street elbows connected to 0.75-inch non-metallic conduit and affixed to the bed during low-flow conditions using rebar pounded into the gravel streambed substrate and a combination of metal hose clamps and nylon zip ties. The two hydrophones were installed several feet apart with sensors facing towards the center of the channel. In several installations, water level detectors were integrated into the control system to prevent power-up and recording during low-flow conditions. Hydrophones were connected to the controller through ART ProAudio Dual Pre Project Series preamplifier with gain set to 10 decibels. When operating, the system would record one-minute 16-bit stereo audio files with a 44.1 kilohertz sampling rate at 15-minute intervals. Audio was recorded in Waveform Audio File (WAV) format and then compressed to Free Lossless Audio Codec (FLAC) format for local storage.\nRaw audio files were processed in R to obtain average acoustic pressure in micropascals as a function of frequency based on methods discussed in Geay and others (2017). The primary processing tool was the specgram function from the Signal (2023) R package, which applies a Fourier transform to sequential slices of individual audio files to obtain a table of frequency response over time. Processing was done using a Hamming window, dividing the file into 2048 sub-intervals with 50 percent overlap. The output was normalized based on the dynamic range (2.5) and sensitivity (-180 decibels) of the hydrophones and gain of the pre-amplifier (10 decibels) to obtain results in micropascals. The result is a table describing acoustic pressure by frequency at equal 21.5 Hz intervals between 0 and 22 kHz for each of the 2048 time sub-intervals. Final output was then summarized as the median value for each frequency. This process was done for each channel of the stereo audio files separately. \nAny use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. These data are marked with a Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal (CC0-1.0) public domain dedication and do not have any use constraints.",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.5066/P9XEISWS",
+ "description": "Landing page for access to the data",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "application/http",
+ "title": "Digital Data"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "description": "The metadata original format",
+ "downloadURL": "https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.6463f97cd34ec179a83d30b3.xml",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "Original Metadata"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6463f97cd34ec179a83d30b3",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Glacier Creek",
+ "State of Washington",
+ "USGS:6463f97cd34ec179a83d30b3",
+ "acoustic methods",
+ "environment",
+ "sediment transport"
+ ],
+ "modified": "2026-09-29T00:00:00Z",
+ "publisher": {
+ "@type": "org:Organization",
+ "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"
+ },
+ "spatial": "-121.941934, 48.887013, -121.937985, 48.889411",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Hydrophone data from Glacier Creek, Washington, June 2019 to June 2020"
+ },
+ "description": "Hydrophones were installed on lower Glacier Creek, Washington, and run between June 2019 and June 2020. Two units were installed at or near the state highway 542 (Mt. Baker Highway) Bridge; one on the right bank, directly under the bridge, and one on the left bank, fixed to a boulder about 100 meters upstream. The left-bank unit collected data from June 18, 2019 through June 14, 2020, with significant gaps in late summer and fall of 2019 and Spring of 2020. Recordings from the left bank contain substantial water noise and are considered unlikely to represent sediment movement. The right-bank unit experienced significant issues with power and data recording, such that data were only available from April 30, 2020 through June 25, 2020. The lower hydrophone sensor on the right-bank unit exhibited little variation in acoustic pressure over time, likely due to a connection or recording issue in the system. No bedload sampling was attempted at this site. Stage and discharge records are available from U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) streamgage 12205245 (Glacier Creek below Thompson Creek at Glacier, WA). \nEach hydrophone unit consisted of custom-built controller and recording system to which one or two distinct hydrophone sensors were attached. The controller/recording unit consisted of a Raspberry Pi Zero W using a UUGear Witty Pi 4 real-time clock for time information. These systems used H2a-XLR hydrophones (Aquarian, 2024). Each hydrophone was installed in 0.75-inch 90-degree polyvinyl chloride (PVC) street elbows connected to 0.75-inch non-metallic conduit and affixed to the bed during low-flow conditions using rebar pounded into the gravel streambed substrate and a combination of metal hose clamps and nylon zip ties. The two hydrophones were installed several feet apart with sensors facing towards the center of the channel. In several installations, water level detectors were integrated into the control system to prevent power-up and recording during low-flow conditions. Hydrophones were connected to the controller through ART ProAudio Dual Pre Project Series preamplifier with gain set to 10 decibels. When operating, the system would record one-minute 16-bit stereo audio files with a 44.1 kilohertz sampling rate at 15-minute intervals. Audio was recorded in Waveform Audio File (WAV) format and then compressed to Free Lossless Audio Codec (FLAC) format for local storage.\nRaw audio files were processed in R to obtain average acoustic pressure in micropascals as a function of frequency based on methods discussed in Geay and others (2017). The primary processing tool was the specgram function from the Signal (2023) R package, which applies a Fourier transform to sequential slices of individual audio files to obtain a table of frequency response over time. Processing was done using a Hamming window, dividing the file into 2048 sub-intervals with 50 percent overlap. The output was normalized based on the dynamic range (2.5) and sensitivity (-180 decibels) of the hydrophones and gain of the pre-amplifier (10 decibels) to obtain results in micropascals. The result is a table describing acoustic pressure by frequency at equal 21.5 Hz intervals between 0 and 22 kHz for each of the 2048 time sub-intervals. Final output was then summarized as the median value for each frequency. This process was done for each channel of the stereo audio files separately. \nAny use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. These data are marked with a Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal (CC0-1.0) public domain dedication and do not have any use constraints.",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "Digital Data",
+ "Original Metadata"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/2d774c47-014f-47cd-8756-7282ed06d65c",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/2d774c47-014f-47cd-8756-7282ed06d65c/raw",
+ "has_download": true,
+ "has_spatial": true,
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6463f97cd34ec179a83d30b3",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Glacier Creek",
+ "State of Washington",
+ "USGS:6463f97cd34ec179a83d30b3",
+ "acoustic methods",
+ "environment",
+ "sediment transport"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-10-02T02:25:33.507436",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png",
+ "name": "Department of the Interior",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "doi"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 0,
+ "publisher": "U.S. Geological Survey",
+ "slug": "hydrophone-data-from-glacier-creek-washington-june-2019-to-june-2020",
+ "spatial_centroid": {
+ "lat": 48.8879722,
+ "lon": -121.9403544
+ },
+ "spatial_shape": {
+ "coordinates": [
+ [
+ [
+ -121.941934,
+ 48.887013
+ ],
+ [
+ -121.941934,
+ 48.889411
+ ],
+ [
+ -121.937985,
+ 48.889411
+ ],
+ [
+ -121.937985,
+ 48.887013
+ ],
+ [
+ -121.941934,
+ 48.887013
+ ]
+ ]
+ ],
+ "type": "Polygon"
+ },
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Hydrophone data from Glacier Creek, Washington, June 2019 to June 2020",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 8.725664,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790907844988,
+ 8.725664,
+ 0,
+ "0ef470a9-a876-47ec-a250-d4a35372ee61"
+ ],
+ "access_level": "public",
+ "dcat": {
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "010:12"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "@type": "vcard:Contact",
+ "fn": "Lisa Gaines",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:lisa.gaines@oregonstate.edu"
+ },
+ "description": "EcoAdapt staff located and compiled relevant gray literature from Northwest national forests (e.g., forest management plans, fire management plans and policies, climate change strategy documents) written between 1986-2015, and categorized the ways in which fire-related climate adaptation actions appear in these documents.\nA coding system was created to review and catalog how climate adaptation actions appear in each document. Each document was reviewed and scored based on a 0-2 scale with 0 indicating no presence of climate adaptation action(s) within the document, 1 indicating presence of climate adaptation action(s) within the document, and 2 indicating climate adaptation action(s) are the focus/priority of the document. Each document was reviewed by 2 staff.",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.5066/P13AP9LU",
+ "description": "Landing page for access to the data",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "application/http",
+ "title": "Digital Data"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "description": "The metadata original format",
+ "downloadURL": "https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.574dfc46e4b07e28b66901f4.xml",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "Original Metadata"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_574dfc46e4b07e28b66901f4",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Idaho",
+ "Oregon",
+ "USGS:574dfc46e4b07e28b66901f4",
+ "Washington",
+ "adaptive management",
+ "climate change",
+ "datasets",
+ "decision support methods",
+ "environment",
+ "external research support",
+ "fire",
+ "fires",
+ "forests",
+ "management methods",
+ "natural resource management"
+ ],
+ "modified": "2026-09-29T00:00:00Z",
+ "publisher": {
+ "@type": "org:Organization",
+ "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"
+ },
+ "spatial": "-124.1455, 41.9677, -110.7422, 49.0379",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Catalog of Fire-Related Climate Adaptation Actions: Phase 2 Literature Review"
+ },
+ "description": "EcoAdapt staff located and compiled relevant gray literature from Northwest national forests (e.g., forest management plans, fire management plans and policies, climate change strategy documents) written between 1986-2015, and categorized the ways in which fire-related climate adaptation actions appear in these documents.\nA coding system was created to review and catalog how climate adaptation actions appear in each document. Each document was reviewed and scored based on a 0-2 scale with 0 indicating no presence of climate adaptation action(s) within the document, 1 indicating presence of climate adaptation action(s) within the document, and 2 indicating climate adaptation action(s) are the focus/priority of the document. Each document was reviewed by 2 staff.",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "Digital Data",
+ "Original Metadata"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/2a3f08e7-ba9e-4498-bd7a-f6a1049fe138",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/2a3f08e7-ba9e-4498-bd7a-f6a1049fe138/raw",
+ "has_download": true,
+ "has_spatial": true,
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_574dfc46e4b07e28b66901f4",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Idaho",
+ "Oregon",
+ "USGS:574dfc46e4b07e28b66901f4",
+ "Washington",
+ "adaptive management",
+ "climate change",
+ "datasets",
+ "decision support methods",
+ "environment",
+ "external research support",
+ "fire",
+ "fires",
+ "forests",
+ "management methods",
+ "natural resource management"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-10-02T02:24:04.988276",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png",
+ "name": "Department of the Interior",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "doi"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 0,
+ "publisher": "U.S. Geological Survey",
+ "slug": "catalog-of-fire-related-climate-adaptation-actions-phase-2-literature-review",
+ "spatial_centroid": {
+ "lat": 44.79578,
+ "lon": -118.78417999999999
+ },
+ "spatial_shape": {
+ "coordinates": [
+ [
+ [
+ -124.1455,
+ 41.9677
+ ],
+ [
+ -124.1455,
+ 49.0379
+ ],
+ [
+ -110.7422,
+ 49.0379
+ ],
+ [
+ -110.7422,
+ 41.9677
+ ],
+ [
+ -124.1455,
+ 41.9677
+ ]
+ ]
+ ],
+ "type": "Polygon"
+ },
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Catalog of Fire-Related Climate Adaptation Actions: Phase 2 Literature Review",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 6.0409355,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790907621716,
+ 6.0409355,
+ 0,
+ "017318fa-f96d-452a-a5d3-ac91aef65643"
+ ],
+ "access_level": "public",
+ "dcat": {
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "010:12"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "@type": "vcard:Contact",
+ "fn": "Oklahoma-Texas Water Science Center",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:gs-w-txpublic-info@usgs.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "This data release contains soil-quality data collected by the U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency at five locations on the east bank of Patrick Bayou at the Patrick Bayou Superfund site in Deer Park, Texas, on March 12, 2026. Soil samples were collected from depth intervals ranging from 12 to 22 inches below land surface and analyzed for volatile organic compounds, semivolatile organic compounds, metals (including mercury), polychlorinated biphenyls (including Aroclors and congeners), and dioxin and furan compounds. Quality-control data and a field trip and data summary report documenting sampling activities and summarizing associated soil-quality results are also included in this data release.",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.5066/P14AJ5AQ",
+ "description": "Landing page for access to the data",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "application/http",
+ "title": "Digital Data"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "description": "The metadata original format",
+ "downloadURL": "https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.69ce756fb66b01fb592822fc.xml",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "Original Metadata"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_69ce756fb66b01fb592822fc",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Aroclors",
+ "Buffalo Bayou",
+ "Deer Park",
+ "East Fork Patrick Bayou",
+ "Galveston Bay",
+ "Harris County",
+ "Houston Ship Channel",
+ "Patrick Bayou",
+ "Patrick Bayou Superfund site",
+ "San Jacinto River",
+ "San Jacinto River Basin",
+ "Superfund",
+ "Texas",
+ "U.S. Environmental Protection Agency",
+ "USGS:69ce756fb66b01fb592822fc",
+ "clay deposits",
+ "congeners",
+ "contaminant transport",
+ "contamination and pollution",
+ "dioxins",
+ "environment",
+ "furans",
+ "geochemistry",
+ "geoscientificInformation",
+ "industrial pollution",
+ "inlandWaters",
+ "mercury",
+ "metals",
+ "polychlorinated biphenyls",
+ "semivolatile organic compounds",
+ "soil chemistry",
+ "soil composition",
+ "soil sciences",
+ "soil-quality sampling",
+ "volatile organic compounds"
+ ],
+ "modified": "2026-09-29T00:00:00Z",
+ "publisher": {
+ "@type": "org:Organization",
+ "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"
+ },
+ "spatial": "-95.1157600, 29.7226000, -95.1156000, 29.7227500",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Soil-quality sampling at the Patrick Bayou Superfund site, Deer Park, Texas, March 2026"
+ },
+ "description": "This data release contains soil-quality data collected by the U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency at five locations on the east bank of Patrick Bayou at the Patrick Bayou Superfund site in Deer Park, Texas, on March 12, 2026. Soil samples were collected from depth intervals ranging from 12 to 22 inches below land surface and analyzed for volatile organic compounds, semivolatile organic compounds, metals (including mercury), polychlorinated biphenyls (including Aroclors and congeners), and dioxin and furan compounds. Quality-control data and a field trip and data summary report documenting sampling activities and summarizing associated soil-quality results are also included in this data release.",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "Digital Data",
+ "Original Metadata"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/2e6980a1-675a-4a7a-ba7c-e5270dcab84f",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/2e6980a1-675a-4a7a-ba7c-e5270dcab84f/raw",
+ "has_download": true,
+ "has_spatial": true,
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_69ce756fb66b01fb592822fc",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Aroclors",
+ "Buffalo Bayou",
+ "Deer Park",
+ "East Fork Patrick Bayou",
+ "Galveston Bay",
+ "Harris County",
+ "Houston Ship Channel",
+ "Patrick Bayou",
+ "Patrick Bayou Superfund site",
+ "San Jacinto River",
+ "San Jacinto River Basin",
+ "Superfund",
+ "Texas",
+ "U.S. Environmental Protection Agency",
+ "USGS:69ce756fb66b01fb592822fc",
+ "clay deposits",
+ "congeners",
+ "contaminant transport",
+ "contamination and pollution",
+ "dioxins",
+ "environment",
+ "furans",
+ "geochemistry",
+ "geoscientificInformation",
+ "industrial pollution",
+ "inlandWaters",
+ "mercury",
+ "metals",
+ "polychlorinated biphenyls",
+ "semivolatile organic compounds",
+ "soil chemistry",
+ "soil composition",
+ "soil sciences",
+ "soil-quality sampling",
+ "volatile organic compounds"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-10-02T02:20:21.716271",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png",
+ "name": "Department of the Interior",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "doi"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 0,
+ "publisher": "U.S. Geological Survey",
+ "slug": "soil-quality-sampling-at-the-patrick-bayou-superfund-site-deer-park-texas-march-2026",
+ "spatial_centroid": {
+ "lat": 29.72266,
+ "lon": -95.115696
+ },
+ "spatial_shape": {
+ "coordinates": [
+ [
+ [
+ -95.11576,
+ 29.7226
+ ],
+ [
+ -95.11576,
+ 29.72275
+ ],
+ [
+ -95.1156,
+ 29.72275
+ ],
+ [
+ -95.1156,
+ 29.7226
+ ],
+ [
+ -95.11576,
+ 29.7226
+ ]
+ ]
+ ],
+ "type": "Polygon"
+ },
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Soil-quality sampling at the Patrick Bayou Superfund site, Deer Park, Texas, March 2026",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 10.200695,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790907203573,
+ 10.200695,
+ 0,
+ "9ce644b4-8d15-447c-b5d3-e05a87283681"
+ ],
+ "access_level": "public",
+ "dcat": {
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "010:12"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "@type": "vcard:Contact",
+ "fn": "Kim Perkins",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:kperkins@usgs.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "These data are from the reclaimed uranium mine site Kanab North near Grand Canyon National Park in Arizona. We collected data and soil samples within a highly disturbed mine reclamation area and a nearby undisturbed area for comparison. The data set includes measurements of field saturated hydraulic conductivity (Kfs), particle size distributions, lab-measured soil-water content and bulk density from subsurface core samples, and time series data from soil-water content and matric potential probes. \nKfs was measured by 2 methods: tension infiltrometer (30 disturbed locations, 21 undisturbed locations) and single ring falling head infiltrometer (28 disturbed locations, 21 undisturbed locations). Using two infiltration methods provides information on water movement through the soil matrix alone as well as combined matrix and macropore flow. We measured infiltration capacity of the soil matrix using mini disk (MD) tension infiltrometers (METER Group*), which are 90 ml-capacity plastic, 2-chamber cylindrical reservoirs. The water is held under tension connected to a 4.5‐cm‐diameter, 3‐mm‐thick sintered stainless-steel disk through which water flows into the soil. Infiltrating water under tension prevents the filling of the macropores and gives a field-saturated hydraulic conductivity (Kfs) characteristic of the soil matrix only. The MD tension, or suction head, was set at 1 cm for all measurements for consistency and comparability to other studies. For simplicity, we used the general calculation method recommended by the instrument manufacturer (METER Group*). We measured the combined infiltration capacity of the soil matrix and macropores using falling-head, single-ring infiltrometers. These metal rings, 10 cm in diameter and 13 cm in length, were pressed into the soil during the measurement interval. The method for calculating the field-saturated hydraulic conductivity (Kfs) accounts for both variable falling head and subsurface radial spreading that unavoidably occurs with small ring size (Nimmo et al. 2009). \nContinuous soil cores were collected at 7 disturbed (44 samples in total) and 6 undisturbed locations (25 samples in total). Bulk samples were collected at the land surface (0-3”) at 47 locations for particle size analysis. Samples were air-dried, disaggregated using a mortar and pestle, and any coarse fragments greater than 2 mm were removed using a screen mesh. Samples were then split using a stainless-steel sample splitter and a 16-part spinning riffler to achieve a representative sample. We analyzed the samples by optical diffraction (Gee and Or, 2002) using a Beckman-Coulter LS-13-320* Particle Size Analyzer. Standards were run prior to and following batch sample runs to ensure machine accuracy. Soil textural class was determined based on the USDA soil classification and clay, silt, and sand percentage are reported here. Bulk density and field water content were determined from basic weight and volume measurements on the core samples. \nTime series subsurface probe data are from 6 locations (3 disturbed with 2 depths each and 3 undisturbed with 3 depth each) with collection set at 15-minute time intervals. Water content was measured using model CS655 TDR probes from Campbell Scientific, Inc.* and matric potential was measured using model Teros 21 probes from Meter Group*. \n*Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.\nGee, G.W., and Or, D., 2002, Particle-Size Analysis, in Dane, J.H. and Topp, G.C. eds., Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 4--Physical Methods: Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, p. 255–293.\nNimmo, J.R., Schmidt, K.M., Perkins, K.S., and Stock, J.D., 2009, Rapid Measurement of Field-Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity for Areal Characterization: Vadose Zone Journal, v. 8, no. 1, p. 142-149.",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.5066/P14QXFC9",
+ "description": "Landing page for access to the data",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "application/http",
+ "title": "Digital Data"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "description": "The metadata original format",
+ "downloadURL": "https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.67f904c3d4be022c3e84efa4.xml",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "Original Metadata"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_67f904c3d4be022c3e84efa4",
+ "keyword": [
+ "USGS:67f904c3d4be022c3e84efa4",
+ "desert ecosystems",
+ "environment",
+ "hydrology",
+ "percolation",
+ "soil moisture",
+ "unsaturated zone"
+ ],
+ "modified": "2026-09-29T00:00:00Z",
+ "publisher": {
+ "@type": "org:Organization",
+ "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"
+ },
+ "spatial": "-112.8694, 36.4644, -112.5027, 36.7158",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Unsaturated zone monitoring data from a reclaimed uranium mine site, Grand Canyon, USA, 2022-2025"
+ },
+ "description": "These data are from the reclaimed uranium mine site Kanab North near Grand Canyon National Park in Arizona. We collected data and soil samples within a highly disturbed mine reclamation area and a nearby undisturbed area for comparison. The data set includes measurements of field saturated hydraulic conductivity (Kfs), particle size distributions, lab-measured soil-water content and bulk density from subsurface core samples, and time series data from soil-water content and matric potential probes. \nKfs was measured by 2 methods: tension infiltrometer (30 disturbed locations, 21 undisturbed locations) and single ring falling head infiltrometer (28 disturbed locations, 21 undisturbed locations). Using two infiltration methods provides information on water movement through the soil matrix alone as well as combined matrix and macropore flow. We measured infiltration capacity of the soil matrix using mini disk (MD) tension infiltrometers (METER Group*), which are 90 ml-capacity plastic, 2-chamber cylindrical reservoirs. The water is held under tension connected to a 4.5‐cm‐diameter, 3‐mm‐thick sintered stainless-steel disk through which water flows into the soil. Infiltrating water under tension prevents the filling of the macropores and gives a field-saturated hydraulic conductivity (Kfs) characteristic of the soil matrix only. The MD tension, or suction head, was set at 1 cm for all measurements for consistency and comparability to other studies. For simplicity, we used the general calculation method recommended by the instrument manufacturer (METER Group*). We measured the combined infiltration capacity of the soil matrix and macropores using falling-head, single-ring infiltrometers. These metal rings, 10 cm in diameter and 13 cm in length, were pressed into the soil during the measurement interval. The method for calculating the field-saturated hydraulic conductivity (Kfs) accounts for both variable falling head and subsurface radial spreading that unavoidably occurs with small ring size (Nimmo et al. 2009). \nContinuous soil cores were collected at 7 disturbed (44 samples in total) and 6 undisturbed locations (25 samples in total). Bulk samples were collected at the land surface (0-3”) at 47 locations for particle size analysis. Samples were air-dried, disaggregated using a mortar and pestle, and any coarse fragments greater than 2 mm were removed using a screen mesh. Samples were then split using a stainless-steel sample splitter and a 16-part spinning riffler to achieve a representative sample. We analyzed the samples by optical diffraction (Gee and Or, 2002) using a Beckman-Coulter LS-13-320* Particle Size Analyzer. Standards were run prior to and following batch sample runs to ensure machine accuracy. Soil textural class was determined based on the USDA soil classification and clay, silt, and sand percentage are reported here. Bulk density and field water content were determined from basic weight and volume measurements on the core samples. \nTime series subsurface probe data are from 6 locations (3 disturbed with 2 depths each and 3 undisturbed with 3 depth each) with collection set at 15-minute time intervals. Water content was measured using model CS655 TDR probes from Campbell Scientific, Inc.* and matric potential was measured using model Teros 21 probes from Meter Group*. \n*Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.\nGee, G.W., and Or, D., 2002, Particle-Size Analysis, in Dane, J.H. and Topp, G.C. eds., Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 4--Physical Methods: Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, p. 255–293.\nNimmo, J.R., Schmidt, K.M., Perkins, K.S., and Stock, J.D., 2009, Rapid Measurement of Field-Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity for Areal Characterization: Vadose Zone Journal, v. 8, no. 1, p. 142-149.",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "Digital Data",
+ "Original Metadata"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/efa47c57-e09d-47b8-93c1-b1bdf18c9c79",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/efa47c57-e09d-47b8-93c1-b1bdf18c9c79/raw",
+ "has_download": true,
+ "has_spatial": true,
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_67f904c3d4be022c3e84efa4",
+ "keyword": [
+ "USGS:67f904c3d4be022c3e84efa4",
+ "desert ecosystems",
+ "environment",
+ "hydrology",
+ "percolation",
+ "soil moisture",
+ "unsaturated zone"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-10-02T02:13:23.573641",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png",
+ "name": "Department of the Interior",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "doi"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 0,
+ "publisher": "U.S. Geological Survey",
+ "slug": "unsaturated-zone-monitoring-data-from-a-reclaimed-uranium-mine-site-grand-canyon-2022-2025",
+ "spatial_centroid": {
+ "lat": 36.56496,
+ "lon": -112.72272000000001
+ },
+ "spatial_shape": {
+ "coordinates": [
+ [
+ [
+ -112.8694,
+ 36.4644
+ ],
+ [
+ -112.8694,
+ 36.7158
+ ],
+ [
+ -112.5027,
+ 36.7158
+ ],
+ [
+ -112.5027,
+ 36.4644
+ ],
+ [
+ -112.8694,
+ 36.4644
+ ]
+ ]
+ ],
+ "type": "Polygon"
+ },
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Unsaturated zone monitoring data from a reclaimed uranium mine site, Grand Canyon, USA, 2022-2025",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 10.201826,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790907156591,
+ 10.201826,
+ 0,
+ "e72f6e45-79a3-4a24-8879-8e45dcd48b74"
+ ],
+ "access_level": "public",
+ "dcat": {
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "010:12"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "@type": "vcard:Contact",
+ "fn": "Scott W Anderson",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:swanderson@usgs.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "Hydrophones were installed on the Big Wood River, Idaho, just downstream of Wood River Campground access bridge, and operated during the spring of 2020. Two independent acoustic recording units were installed, one on each bank, with two hydrophone sensors linked to each unit. Sensors were slightly offset, with one sensor located lower on the bank and one located higher. Both units collected data from May 29 to June 10, 2020, spanning the spring snowmelt peak flow. At both banks, the higher sensors were never submerged and audio consisted of soft ambient water noise. The units were set to collect data at 15-minute intervals, though gaps between records of 60-120 minutes were common. These gaps likely reflect issues with a water level detector integrated into the system, which was meant to prevent recording start-up if the detector was not submerged. Discharge for the site was provided by U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) streamgage 13135500 (Big Wood River near Ketchum, ID). \nMcBain and Associates conducted bedload sampling at the monitoring site on May 30, 2020. Sampling was performed from a cataraft tethered to a channel-spanning cableway, using a Toutle River II bedload sampler. Two test transects were completed and yielded small amounts of sand and a few pebbles. No further sampling was conducted and the samples were discarded without processing. \nEach hydrophone unit consisted of custom-built controller and recording system to which one or two distinct hydrophone sensors were attached (Marineau and others, 2016). The controller/recording unit consisted of a Raspberry Pi Zero W using a UUGear Witty Pi 4 real-time clock for time information. These systems used H2a-XLR hydrophones (Aquarian Audio, 2024). Each hydrophone was installed in 0.75-inch 90-degree polyvinyl chloride (PVC) street elbows connected to 0.75-inch non-metallic conduit and affixed to the bed during low-flow conditions using rebar pounded into the gravel substrate and a combination of metal hose clamps and nylon zip ties. The two hydrophones were installed several feet apart with sensors facing towards the center of the channel. Water level detectors were integrated into the control system to prevent power-up and recording during low-flow conditions, although these systems were prone to failure. Hydrophones were connected to the controller through ART ProAudio Dual Pre Project Series preamplifier with gain set to 10 decibels. When operating, the system would record one-minute 16-bit stereo audio files with a 44.1 kilohertz sampling rate at 15-minute intervals. Audio was recorded in Waveform Audio File (WAV) format and then compressed to Free Lossless Audio Codec (FLAC) format for local storage. \nRaw audio files were processed in R to obtain average acoustic pressure in micropascals as a function of frequency based on methods discussed in Geay and others (2017). The primary processing tool was the specgram function from the Signal (2023) R package, which applies a Fourier transform to sequential slices of individual audio files to obtain a table of frequency response over time. Processing was done using a Hamming window, dividing the file into 2048 sub-intervals with 50 percent overlap. The output was normalized based on the dynamic range (2.5) and sensitivity (-180 decibels) of the hydrophones and gain of the pre-amplifier (10 decibels) to obtain results in micropascals. The result is a table describing acoustic pressure by frequency at equal 21.5 Hz intervals between 0 and 22 kHz for each of the 2048 time sub-intervals. Final output was then summarized as the median value for each frequency. This process was done for each channel of the stereo audio files separately. \nAny use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. These data are marked with a Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal (CC0-1.0) public domain dedication and do not have any use constraints.",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.5066/P9XEISWS",
+ "description": "Landing page for access to the data",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "application/http",
+ "title": "Digital Data"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "description": "The metadata original format",
+ "downloadURL": "https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.6463f9ecd34ec179a83d30ba.xml",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "Original Metadata"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6463f9ecd34ec179a83d30ba",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Big Wood River",
+ "Idaho",
+ "USGS:6463f9ecd34ec179a83d30ba",
+ "acoustic methods",
+ "environment",
+ "sediment transport"
+ ],
+ "modified": "2026-09-29T00:00:00Z",
+ "publisher": {
+ "@type": "org:Organization",
+ "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"
+ },
+ "spatial": "-114.4578838, 43.7934486, -114.4566286, 43.7940023",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Hydrophone data from the Big Wood River, Idaho, May 2020 to June 2020"
+ },
+ "description": "Hydrophones were installed on the Big Wood River, Idaho, just downstream of Wood River Campground access bridge, and operated during the spring of 2020. Two independent acoustic recording units were installed, one on each bank, with two hydrophone sensors linked to each unit. Sensors were slightly offset, with one sensor located lower on the bank and one located higher. Both units collected data from May 29 to June 10, 2020, spanning the spring snowmelt peak flow. At both banks, the higher sensors were never submerged and audio consisted of soft ambient water noise. The units were set to collect data at 15-minute intervals, though gaps between records of 60-120 minutes were common. These gaps likely reflect issues with a water level detector integrated into the system, which was meant to prevent recording start-up if the detector was not submerged. Discharge for the site was provided by U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) streamgage 13135500 (Big Wood River near Ketchum, ID). \nMcBain and Associates conducted bedload sampling at the monitoring site on May 30, 2020. Sampling was performed from a cataraft tethered to a channel-spanning cableway, using a Toutle River II bedload sampler. Two test transects were completed and yielded small amounts of sand and a few pebbles. No further sampling was conducted and the samples were discarded without processing. \nEach hydrophone unit consisted of custom-built controller and recording system to which one or two distinct hydrophone sensors were attached (Marineau and others, 2016). The controller/recording unit consisted of a Raspberry Pi Zero W using a UUGear Witty Pi 4 real-time clock for time information. These systems used H2a-XLR hydrophones (Aquarian Audio, 2024). Each hydrophone was installed in 0.75-inch 90-degree polyvinyl chloride (PVC) street elbows connected to 0.75-inch non-metallic conduit and affixed to the bed during low-flow conditions using rebar pounded into the gravel substrate and a combination of metal hose clamps and nylon zip ties. The two hydrophones were installed several feet apart with sensors facing towards the center of the channel. Water level detectors were integrated into the control system to prevent power-up and recording during low-flow conditions, although these systems were prone to failure. Hydrophones were connected to the controller through ART ProAudio Dual Pre Project Series preamplifier with gain set to 10 decibels. When operating, the system would record one-minute 16-bit stereo audio files with a 44.1 kilohertz sampling rate at 15-minute intervals. Audio was recorded in Waveform Audio File (WAV) format and then compressed to Free Lossless Audio Codec (FLAC) format for local storage. \nRaw audio files were processed in R to obtain average acoustic pressure in micropascals as a function of frequency based on methods discussed in Geay and others (2017). The primary processing tool was the specgram function from the Signal (2023) R package, which applies a Fourier transform to sequential slices of individual audio files to obtain a table of frequency response over time. Processing was done using a Hamming window, dividing the file into 2048 sub-intervals with 50 percent overlap. The output was normalized based on the dynamic range (2.5) and sensitivity (-180 decibels) of the hydrophones and gain of the pre-amplifier (10 decibels) to obtain results in micropascals. The result is a table describing acoustic pressure by frequency at equal 21.5 Hz intervals between 0 and 22 kHz for each of the 2048 time sub-intervals. Final output was then summarized as the median value for each frequency. This process was done for each channel of the stereo audio files separately. \nAny use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. These data are marked with a Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal (CC0-1.0) public domain dedication and do not have any use constraints.",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "Digital Data",
+ "Original Metadata"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/10be42fd-9870-4e9b-81f5-673abe164789",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/10be42fd-9870-4e9b-81f5-673abe164789/raw",
+ "has_download": true,
+ "has_spatial": true,
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6463f9ecd34ec179a83d30ba",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Big Wood River",
+ "Idaho",
+ "USGS:6463f9ecd34ec179a83d30ba",
+ "acoustic methods",
+ "environment",
+ "sediment transport"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-10-02T02:12:36.591963",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png",
+ "name": "Department of the Interior",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "doi"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 0,
+ "publisher": "U.S. Geological Survey",
+ "slug": "hydrophone-data-from-the-big-wood-river-idaho-may-2020-to-june-2020",
+ "spatial_centroid": {
+ "lat": 43.79367008,
+ "lon": -114.45738172000001
+ },
+ "spatial_shape": {
+ "coordinates": [
+ [
+ [
+ -114.4578838,
+ 43.7934486
+ ],
+ [
+ -114.4578838,
+ 43.7940023
+ ],
+ [
+ -114.4566286,
+ 43.7940023
+ ],
+ [
+ -114.4566286,
+ 43.7934486
+ ],
+ [
+ -114.4578838,
+ 43.7934486
+ ]
+ ]
+ ],
+ "type": "Polygon"
+ },
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Hydrophone data from the Big Wood River, Idaho, May 2020 to June 2020",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 6.4137583,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790906431128,
+ 6.4137583,
+ 0,
+ "9a659b97-b351-462a-bdfa-a566225ffd9b"
+ ],
+ "access_level": "public",
+ "dcat": {
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "010:12"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "@type": "vcard:Contact",
+ "fn": "Climate Adaptation Science Centers",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:casc-data@usgs.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "The estimates were derived from variable distance data collected 3-4 times per year at point count stations randomly located along line transects. Density Estimates from Line Transect Sampling (individuals per km^2): Density estimates of four mammal species in the upper subalpine and alpine zones of the Sierra Nevada range, 2008 - 2012. The estimates were derived from variable distance data collected 3-4 per year along each of 21 transects (10 km in length). The transects were randomly selected from a pool of 53 potential routes. Nine transects were sampled in 2008, 12 were sampled in 2009, 19 were sampled in 2010, 21 were sampled in 2011, and 17 were sampled in 2012. All counts were done in July and August each year. Replicate samples within a given year were done within 2-8 days of each other. All counts were done by single observers. The spreadsheet has six worksheets, including three with density estimates for each species at different scales, one worksheet with definitions of the fields, one worksheet with the species names, and a worksheet that defines the scale and units of the estimates in the five worksheets for density Density Estimates from Point Count Sampling (individuals per hectare): There were 21 transects (10 km in length) that had been randomly selected from a pool of 53 potential routes, with 10 point count stations along each transect (minimum of 200 m spacing between stations). 45 stations were sampled in 2008 (5 stations on each of 9 transects), 60 stations were sampled in 2009 (5 stations on each of 12 transects),190 stations were sampled in 2010 (10 stations on each of 19 transects), 210 stations were sampled in 2011 (10 stations on each of 19 transects), and 170 stations were sampled in 2012 (10 stations on each of 17 transects). All counts were done in July and August each year. Replicate samples within a given year were done within 2-8 days of each other. All counts were done by single observers.",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.5066/P1QZMNOE",
+ "description": "Landing page for access to the data",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "application/http",
+ "title": "Digital Data"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "description": "The metadata original format",
+ "downloadURL": "https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.544947aee4b0f888a81bb4df.xml",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "Original Metadata"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_544947aee4b0f888a81bb4df",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Belding's ground squirrel",
+ "Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest",
+ "Inyo National Forest",
+ "Pika",
+ "Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks",
+ "Sierra National Forest",
+ "Sierra Nevada",
+ "Stanislaus National Forest",
+ "USGS:544947aee4b0f888a81bb4df",
+ "Yosemite National Park",
+ "abundance",
+ "alpine",
+ "atmospheric and climatic processes",
+ "biota",
+ "climate",
+ "distance sampling",
+ "environment",
+ "field inventory and monitoring",
+ "geospatial datasets",
+ "golden-mantled ground squirrel",
+ "habitats",
+ "marmot",
+ "occupancy",
+ "point counts",
+ "relative abundance analysis",
+ "statistical analysis",
+ "wildlife"
+ ],
+ "modified": "2026-09-29T00:00:00Z",
+ "publisher": {
+ "@type": "org:Organization",
+ "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"
+ },
+ "spatial": "-121.8823, 35.2187, -117.0813, 40.7306",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Density estimates of four mammal species in the upper subalpine and alpine zones of the Sierra Nevada range, 2008 - 2012"
+ },
+ "description": "The estimates were derived from variable distance data collected 3-4 times per year at point count stations randomly located along line transects. Density Estimates from Line Transect Sampling (individuals per km^2): Density estimates of four mammal species in the upper subalpine and alpine zones of the Sierra Nevada range, 2008 - 2012. The estimates were derived from variable distance data collected 3-4 per year along each of 21 transects (10 km in length). The transects were randomly selected from a pool of 53 potential routes. Nine transects were sampled in 2008, 12 were sampled in 2009, 19 were sampled in 2010, 21 were sampled in 2011, and 17 were sampled in 2012. All counts were done in July and August each year. Replicate samples within a given year were done within 2-8 days of each other. All counts were done by single observers. The spreadsheet has six worksheets, including three with density estimates for each species at different scales, one worksheet with definitions of the fields, one worksheet with the species names, and a worksheet that defines the scale and units of the estimates in the five worksheets for density Density Estimates from Point Count Sampling (individuals per hectare): There were 21 transects (10 km in length) that had been randomly selected from a pool of 53 potential routes, with 10 point count stations along each transect (minimum of 200 m spacing between stations). 45 stations were sampled in 2008 (5 stations on each of 9 transects), 60 stations were sampled in 2009 (5 stations on each of 12 transects),190 stations were sampled in 2010 (10 stations on each of 19 transects), 210 stations were sampled in 2011 (10 stations on each of 19 transects), and 170 stations were sampled in 2012 (10 stations on each of 17 transects). All counts were done in July and August each year. Replicate samples within a given year were done within 2-8 days of each other. All counts were done by single observers.",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "Digital Data",
+ "Original Metadata"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/e7c263da-055d-4278-bd2e-974f06d9b20c",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/e7c263da-055d-4278-bd2e-974f06d9b20c/raw",
+ "has_download": true,
+ "has_spatial": true,
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_544947aee4b0f888a81bb4df",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Belding's ground squirrel",
+ "Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest",
+ "Inyo National Forest",
+ "Pika",
+ "Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks",
+ "Sierra National Forest",
+ "Sierra Nevada",
+ "Stanislaus National Forest",
+ "USGS:544947aee4b0f888a81bb4df",
+ "Yosemite National Park",
+ "abundance",
+ "alpine",
+ "atmospheric and climatic processes",
+ "biota",
+ "climate",
+ "distance sampling",
+ "environment",
+ "field inventory and monitoring",
+ "geospatial datasets",
+ "golden-mantled ground squirrel",
+ "habitats",
+ "marmot",
+ "occupancy",
+ "point counts",
+ "relative abundance analysis",
+ "statistical analysis",
+ "wildlife"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-10-02T02:00:31.128819",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png",
+ "name": "Department of the Interior",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "doi"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 0,
+ "publisher": "U.S. Geological Survey",
+ "slug": "density-estimates-of-four-mammal-species-in-the-upper-subalpine-and-alpine-zones-2008-2012",
+ "spatial_centroid": {
+ "lat": 37.42346,
+ "lon": -119.96189999999999
+ },
+ "spatial_shape": {
+ "coordinates": [
+ [
+ [
+ -121.8823,
+ 35.2187
+ ],
+ [
+ -121.8823,
+ 40.7306
+ ],
+ [
+ -117.0813,
+ 40.7306
+ ],
+ [
+ -117.0813,
+ 35.2187
+ ],
+ [
+ -121.8823,
+ 35.2187
+ ]
+ ]
+ ],
+ "type": "Polygon"
+ },
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Density estimates of four mammal species in the upper subalpine and alpine zones of the Sierra Nevada range, 2008 - 2012",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 10.200695,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790905749191,
+ 10.200695,
+ 0,
+ "59e9cf83-08bd-4240-93ee-9ec837b833b6"
+ ],
+ "access_level": "public",
+ "dcat": {
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "010:12"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "@type": "vcard:Contact",
+ "fn": "Scott W Anderson",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:swanderson@usgs.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "Hydrophones were installed on the Skagit River at Marblemount in October of 2020. Two independent acoustic recorder units were installed, one on each bank, with two hydrophone sensors linked to each unit. The left-bank installation was located about 50 meters upstream of the Cascade River Road bridge on a low-gradient bank with a small side channel just upstream. The right-bank installation was located about 250 meters upstream of the bridge at the base of a steep vegetated slope. The units were set to record one-minute audio files at 15-minute intervals. The majority of the data were collected between October 21, 2020 and May 26, 2022. Gaps regularly occur over this main period of record, either because water level sensors indicated dry conditions and so shut off recording as intended, or because batteries were depleted between field visits. After May 2022, data were only obtained during two short bedload sampling efforts, with useable data only obtained from one of the two sensors on the right bank. \nBetween May 2022 and January 2024, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) collected 10 bedload measurements over four sampling days from the Cascade River Road bridge. Due to various technical issues with the hydrophones, only one sensor from the right bank was operational during a majority of sampling efforts, and that one sensor was also out of operation for one sampling day during which three samples were collected. Paired hydrophone and bedload data are then somewhat limited. Discharge at the site was provided by USGS streamgage 12181000 (Skagit River at Marblemount, WA), co-located with the hydrophone monitoring location. The primary monitoring period includes a November 15, 2021 flood with a peak of 63,400 cubic feet per second, the second highest peak in 61 years of record. \nEach hydrophone unit consisted of custom-built controller and recording system to which one or two distinct hydrophone sensors were attached (Marineau and others, 2016). The controller/recording unit consisted of a Raspberry Pi Zero W using a UUGear Witty Pi 4 real-time clock for time information. These systems used H2a-XLR hydrophones (Aquarian Audio, 2024). Each hydrophone was installed in 0.75-inch 90-degree polyvinyl chloride (PVC) street elbows connected to 0.75-inch non-metallic conduit and affixed to the bed during low-flow conditions using rebar pounded into the gravel substrate and a combination of metal hose clamps and nylon zip ties. The two hydrophones were installed several feet apart with sensors facing towards the center of the channel. Hydrophones were connected to the controller through ART ProAudio Dual Pre Project Series preamplifier with gain set to 10 decibels. When operating, the system would record one-minute 16-bit stereo audio files with a 44.1 kilohertz sampling rate at 15-minute intervals. Audio was recorded in Waveform Audio File (WAV) format and then compressed to Free Lossless Audio Codec (FLAC) format for local storage. \nRaw audio files were processed in R to obtain average acoustic pressure in micropascals as a function of frequency using methods discussed in Geay and others (2017). The primary processing tool was the specgram function from the Signal (2023) R package, which applies a Fourier transform to sequential slices of individual audio files to obtain a table of frequency response over time. Processing was done using a Hamming window, dividing the file into 2048 sub-intervals with 50 percent overlap. The output was normalized based on the dynamic range (2.5) and sensitivity (-180 decibels) of the hydrophones and gain of the pre-amplifier (10 decibels) to obtain results in micropascals. The result is a table describing acoustic pressure by frequency at equal 21.5 Hz intervals between 0 and 22 kHz for each of the 2048 time sub-intervals. Final output was then summarized as the median acoustic pressure value for each frequency. This process was done for each channel of the stereo audio files separately. \nAny use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. These data are marked with a Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal (CC0-1.0) public domain dedication and do not have any use constraints.",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.5066/P9XEISWS",
+ "description": "Landing page for access to the data",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "application/http",
+ "title": "Digital Data"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "description": "The metadata original format",
+ "downloadURL": "https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.6463fa07d34ec179a83d30bc.xml",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "Original Metadata"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6463fa07d34ec179a83d30bc",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Skagit River",
+ "State of Washington",
+ "USGS:6463fa07d34ec179a83d30bc",
+ "acoustic methods",
+ "environment",
+ "sediment transport"
+ ],
+ "modified": "2026-09-29T00:00:00Z",
+ "publisher": {
+ "@type": "org:Organization",
+ "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"
+ },
+ "spatial": "-121.4328, 48.5328, -121.4259, 48.5247",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Hydrophone data from the Skagit River at Marblemount, Washington, October 2020 to January 2024"
+ },
+ "description": "Hydrophones were installed on the Skagit River at Marblemount in October of 2020. Two independent acoustic recorder units were installed, one on each bank, with two hydrophone sensors linked to each unit. The left-bank installation was located about 50 meters upstream of the Cascade River Road bridge on a low-gradient bank with a small side channel just upstream. The right-bank installation was located about 250 meters upstream of the bridge at the base of a steep vegetated slope. The units were set to record one-minute audio files at 15-minute intervals. The majority of the data were collected between October 21, 2020 and May 26, 2022. Gaps regularly occur over this main period of record, either because water level sensors indicated dry conditions and so shut off recording as intended, or because batteries were depleted between field visits. After May 2022, data were only obtained during two short bedload sampling efforts, with useable data only obtained from one of the two sensors on the right bank. \nBetween May 2022 and January 2024, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) collected 10 bedload measurements over four sampling days from the Cascade River Road bridge. Due to various technical issues with the hydrophones, only one sensor from the right bank was operational during a majority of sampling efforts, and that one sensor was also out of operation for one sampling day during which three samples were collected. Paired hydrophone and bedload data are then somewhat limited. Discharge at the site was provided by USGS streamgage 12181000 (Skagit River at Marblemount, WA), co-located with the hydrophone monitoring location. The primary monitoring period includes a November 15, 2021 flood with a peak of 63,400 cubic feet per second, the second highest peak in 61 years of record. \nEach hydrophone unit consisted of custom-built controller and recording system to which one or two distinct hydrophone sensors were attached (Marineau and others, 2016). The controller/recording unit consisted of a Raspberry Pi Zero W using a UUGear Witty Pi 4 real-time clock for time information. These systems used H2a-XLR hydrophones (Aquarian Audio, 2024). Each hydrophone was installed in 0.75-inch 90-degree polyvinyl chloride (PVC) street elbows connected to 0.75-inch non-metallic conduit and affixed to the bed during low-flow conditions using rebar pounded into the gravel substrate and a combination of metal hose clamps and nylon zip ties. The two hydrophones were installed several feet apart with sensors facing towards the center of the channel. Hydrophones were connected to the controller through ART ProAudio Dual Pre Project Series preamplifier with gain set to 10 decibels. When operating, the system would record one-minute 16-bit stereo audio files with a 44.1 kilohertz sampling rate at 15-minute intervals. Audio was recorded in Waveform Audio File (WAV) format and then compressed to Free Lossless Audio Codec (FLAC) format for local storage. \nRaw audio files were processed in R to obtain average acoustic pressure in micropascals as a function of frequency using methods discussed in Geay and others (2017). The primary processing tool was the specgram function from the Signal (2023) R package, which applies a Fourier transform to sequential slices of individual audio files to obtain a table of frequency response over time. Processing was done using a Hamming window, dividing the file into 2048 sub-intervals with 50 percent overlap. The output was normalized based on the dynamic range (2.5) and sensitivity (-180 decibels) of the hydrophones and gain of the pre-amplifier (10 decibels) to obtain results in micropascals. The result is a table describing acoustic pressure by frequency at equal 21.5 Hz intervals between 0 and 22 kHz for each of the 2048 time sub-intervals. Final output was then summarized as the median acoustic pressure value for each frequency. This process was done for each channel of the stereo audio files separately. \nAny use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. These data are marked with a Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal (CC0-1.0) public domain dedication and do not have any use constraints.",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "Digital Data",
+ "Original Metadata"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/e0940d25-86fa-44a6-8473-0994c0161992",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/e0940d25-86fa-44a6-8473-0994c0161992/raw",
+ "has_download": true,
+ "has_spatial": true,
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6463fa07d34ec179a83d30bc",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Skagit River",
+ "State of Washington",
+ "USGS:6463fa07d34ec179a83d30bc",
+ "acoustic methods",
+ "environment",
+ "sediment transport"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-10-02T01:49:09.191310",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png",
+ "name": "Department of the Interior",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "doi"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 0,
+ "publisher": "U.S. Geological Survey",
+ "slug": "hydrophone-data-from-the-skagit-river-at-marblemount-washington-october-2020-to-janua-2024",
+ "spatial_centroid": {
+ "lat": 48.529560000000004,
+ "lon": -121.43004
+ },
+ "spatial_shape": {
+ "coordinates": [
+ [
+ [
+ -121.4328,
+ 48.5328
+ ],
+ [
+ -121.4328,
+ 48.5247
+ ],
+ [
+ -121.4259,
+ 48.5247
+ ],
+ [
+ -121.4259,
+ 48.5328
+ ],
+ [
+ -121.4328,
+ 48.5328
+ ]
+ ]
+ ],
+ "type": "Polygon"
+ },
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Hydrophone data from the Skagit River at Marblemount, Washington, October 2020 to January 2024",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 5.8796606,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790905664911,
+ 5.8796606,
+ 25,
+ "d4f53c92-ef00-4049-9da6-8fab8b7501a3"
+ ],
+ "access_level": "public",
+ "dcat": {
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "010:12"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "@type": "vcard:Contact",
+ "fn": "U.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Science Center",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:gs-ak_asc_datamanagers@usgs.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "These data are daily summary checklists of all bird species observed at U.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Science Center (ASC) field camps. Data include species observation details such as observers, dates, location, and number of individuals seen. Field camps were located in Northern, Western, Interior, Southwest, Southcentral, and Southeast Alaska, Baja California Sur Mexico, and northern Russia.",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.5066/P950QX28",
+ "description": "Landing page for access to the data",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "application/http",
+ "title": "Digital Data"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "description": "The metadata original format",
+ "downloadURL": "https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.ASC367.xml",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "Original Metadata"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_ASC367",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Alaska",
+ "Albatrosses/Petrels and Allies",
+ "Animals/Vertebrates",
+ "Bahia San Quintin",
+ "Baja California Sur",
+ "Biota",
+ "Birds",
+ "Coastal ecosystems",
+ "Cranes",
+ "Ducks/Geese/Swans",
+ "Eagles/Falcons/Hawks and Allies",
+ "Environment",
+ "Fowl",
+ "Game birds",
+ "Laguna Ojo de Liebre",
+ "Laguna San Ignacio",
+ "Loons",
+ "Mexico",
+ "Migration (organisms)",
+ "Migratory birds",
+ "Migratory rates/routes",
+ "Migratory species",
+ "Owls",
+ "Perching Birds",
+ "Raptors",
+ "Russia",
+ "Sakha Republic",
+ "Sandpipers",
+ "Santa Rosalia",
+ "Seabirds",
+ "Seasonal distribution",
+ "Shorebirds",
+ "Songbirds",
+ "Tundra ecosystems",
+ "USGS:ASC367",
+ "United States",
+ "Waders/Gulls/Auks and Allies",
+ "Waterfowl",
+ "Wetland ecosystems",
+ "Wildlife"
+ ],
+ "modified": "2025-03-26T00:00:00Z",
+ "publisher": {
+ "@type": "org:Organization",
+ "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"
+ },
+ "spatial": "-177.18, 18.64, 175.78, 77.76",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Bird Species Checklists from USGS Alaska Science Center Field Camps"
+ },
+ "description": "These data are daily summary checklists of all bird species observed at U.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Science Center (ASC) field camps. Data include species observation details such as observers, dates, location, and number of individuals seen. Field camps were located in Northern, Western, Interior, Southwest, Southcentral, and Southeast Alaska, Baja California Sur Mexico, and northern Russia.",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "Digital Data",
+ "Original Metadata"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/01b8cfdd-11e5-441a-8065-eeb5df24c2bd",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/01b8cfdd-11e5-441a-8065-eeb5df24c2bd/raw",
+ "has_download": true,
+ "has_spatial": true,
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_ASC367",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Alaska",
+ "Albatrosses/Petrels and Allies",
+ "Animals/Vertebrates",
+ "Bahia San Quintin",
+ "Baja California Sur",
+ "Biota",
+ "Birds",
+ "Coastal ecosystems",
+ "Cranes",
+ "Ducks/Geese/Swans",
+ "Eagles/Falcons/Hawks and Allies",
+ "Environment",
+ "Fowl",
+ "Game birds",
+ "Laguna Ojo de Liebre",
+ "Laguna San Ignacio",
+ "Loons",
+ "Mexico",
+ "Migration (organisms)",
+ "Migratory birds",
+ "Migratory rates/routes",
+ "Migratory species",
+ "Owls",
+ "Perching Birds",
+ "Raptors",
+ "Russia",
+ "Sakha Republic",
+ "Sandpipers",
+ "Santa Rosalia",
+ "Seabirds",
+ "Seasonal distribution",
+ "Shorebirds",
+ "Songbirds",
+ "Tundra ecosystems",
+ "USGS:ASC367",
+ "United States",
+ "Waders/Gulls/Auks and Allies",
+ "Waterfowl",
+ "Wetland ecosystems",
+ "Wildlife"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-10-02T01:47:44.911025",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png",
+ "name": "Department of the Interior",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "doi"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 25,
+ "publisher": "U.S. Geological Survey",
+ "slug": "bird-species-checklists-from-usgs-alaska-science-center-field-camps",
+ "spatial_centroid": {
+ "lat": 42.288,
+ "lon": -35.996
+ },
+ "spatial_shape": {
+ "coordinates": [
+ [
+ [
+ -177.18,
+ 18.64
+ ],
+ [
+ -177.18,
+ 77.76
+ ],
+ [
+ 175.78,
+ 77.76
+ ],
+ [
+ 175.78,
+ 18.64
+ ],
+ [
+ -177.18,
+ 18.64
+ ]
+ ]
+ ],
+ "type": "Polygon"
+ },
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Bird Species Checklists from USGS Alaska Science Center Field Camps",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 8.450847,
+ "_sort": [
+ 1790905576465,
+ 8.450847,
+ 0,
+ "9e535814-27fa-4c14-a22a-a4bc611390af"
+ ],
+ "access_level": "public",
+ "dcat": {
+ "accessLevel": "public",
+ "bureauCode": [
+ "010:12"
+ ],
+ "contactPoint": {
+ "@type": "vcard:Contact",
+ "fn": "Christopher Green",
+ "hasEmail": "mailto:ctgreen@usgs.gov"
+ },
+ "description": "Experiments were conducted to characterize infiltration at two soil plots at the Kanab North Mine site in the Arizona Strip from 26 to 29 August, 2024. Plots were located on (1) the reclaimed mine yard soils and (2) natural soils about 50 m north of the former mine yard. At each plot, water was delivered using a pressure-regulated pump for 3 hours and 50 minutes from a truck-mounted tank through an array of pressure-compensated drip irrigation emitters. Electrical resistance data were collected continuously during the water application period and then at increasing intervals until 29 August. After the ERT surveys, at the natural site, depth to the shallow bedrock layer was estimated by pounding steel rods to the depth of refusal. Soil cores were collected and sub-sectioned at both sites for laboratory analysis of grain size distribution, soil moisture, and matric potential. This data release provides the experimental data for the ERT surveys, and depths of refusal.",
+ "distribution": [
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.5066/P13SAHM8",
+ "description": "Landing page for access to the data",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "application/http",
+ "title": "Digital Data"
+ },
+ {
+ "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
+ "description": "The metadata original format",
+ "downloadURL": "https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.68b9d249d4be021c5e4c9c65.xml",
+ "format": "XML",
+ "mediaType": "text/xml",
+ "title": "Original Metadata"
+ }
+ ],
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_68b9d249d4be021c5e4c9c65",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Arizona",
+ "Arizona Strip",
+ "Electrical Resistivity Tomography",
+ "North Mine Kanab",
+ "USGS:68b9d249d4be021c5e4c9c65",
+ "bedrock geologic units",
+ "electrical resistance tomography",
+ "environment",
+ "geophysics",
+ "geoscientificInformation",
+ "hydrologic processes",
+ "infiltration",
+ "unsaturated zone",
+ "uranium mines",
+ "water resources"
+ ],
+ "modified": "2026-09-29T00:00:00Z",
+ "publisher": {
+ "@type": "org:Organization",
+ "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"
+ },
+ "spatial": "-112.6440000, 36.6882390, -112.6437160, 36.6891000",
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Electrical resistance tomography (ERT) surveys collected during infiltration experiments at the Kanab North legacy mine site, 2024"
+ },
+ "description": "Experiments were conducted to characterize infiltration at two soil plots at the Kanab North Mine site in the Arizona Strip from 26 to 29 August, 2024. Plots were located on (1) the reclaimed mine yard soils and (2) natural soils about 50 m north of the former mine yard. At each plot, water was delivered using a pressure-regulated pump for 3 hours and 50 minutes from a truck-mounted tank through an array of pressure-compensated drip irrigation emitters. Electrical resistance data were collected continuously during the water application period and then at increasing intervals until 29 August. After the ERT surveys, at the natural site, depth to the shallow bedrock layer was estimated by pounding steel rods to the depth of refusal. Soil cores were collected and sub-sectioned at both sites for laboratory analysis of grain size distribution, soil moisture, and matric potential. This data release provides the experimental data for the ERT surveys, and depths of refusal.",
+ "distribution_titles": [
+ "Digital Data",
+ "Original Metadata"
+ ],
+ "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/97a4f3b3-c8d3-4c20-b8cb-0bc33e96130f",
+ "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/97a4f3b3-c8d3-4c20-b8cb-0bc33e96130f/raw",
+ "has_download": true,
+ "has_spatial": true,
+ "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_68b9d249d4be021c5e4c9c65",
+ "keyword": [
+ "Arizona",
+ "Arizona Strip",
+ "Electrical Resistivity Tomography",
+ "North Mine Kanab",
+ "USGS:68b9d249d4be021c5e4c9c65",
+ "bedrock geologic units",
+ "electrical resistance tomography",
+ "environment",
+ "geophysics",
+ "geoscientificInformation",
+ "hydrologic processes",
+ "infiltration",
+ "unsaturated zone",
+ "uranium mines",
+ "water resources"
+ ],
+ "last_harvested_date": "2026-10-02T01:46:16.465306",
+ "organization": {
+ "aliases": [
+ "dept"
+ ],
+ "code_repo_exempt": false,
+ "code_repo_url": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "id": "143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8",
+ "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png",
+ "name": "Department of the Interior",
+ "organization_type": "Federal Government",
+ "slug": "doi"
+ },
+ "parent_identifier": null,
+ "popularity": 0,
+ "publisher": "U.S. Geological Survey",
+ "slug": "electrical-resistance-tomography-ert-surveys-collected-during-infiltration-experiment-2024",
+ "spatial_centroid": {
+ "lat": 36.688583400000006,
+ "lon": -112.6438864
+ },
+ "spatial_shape": {
+ "coordinates": [
+ [
+ [
+ -112.644,
+ 36.688239
+ ],
+ [
+ -112.644,
+ 36.6891
+ ],
+ [
+ -112.643716,
+ 36.6891
+ ],
+ [
+ -112.643716,
+ 36.688239
+ ],
+ [
+ -112.644,
+ 36.688239
+ ]
+ ]
+ ],
+ "type": "Polygon"
+ },
+ "theme": [
+ "geospatial"
+ ],
+ "title": "Electrical resistance tomography (ERT) surveys collected during infiltration experiments at the Kanab North legacy mine site, 2024",
+ "type": "dataset"
+ },
+ {
+ "_score": 7.684429,
  "_sort": [
  1790883872813,
- 7.6866255,
+ 7.684429,
  1,
  "9b86a0a5-c623-4a5d-aa62-320bcaf1391a"
  ],
@@ -228,10 +3317,10 @@
  "type": "dataset"
  },
  {
- "_score": 7.7119017,
+ "_score": 7.7088866,
  "_sort": [
  1790883871800,
- 7.7119017,
+ 7.7088866,
  1,
  "c940a3f1-d6b6-4c2f-a153-41234fcf8488"
  ],
@@ -426,10 +3515,10 @@
  "type": "dataset"
  },
  {
- "_score": 7.1282473,
+ "_score": 7.126006,
  "_sort": [
  1790883870750,
- 7.1282473,
+ 7.126006,
  3,
  "84c012d3-ed87-4a28-bd4d-7dc0c5ecbdb6"
  ],
@@ -634,10 +3723,10 @@
  "type": "dataset"
  },
  {
- "_score": 6.9467764,
+ "_score": 6.944045,
  "_sort": [
  1790883869738,
- 6.9467764,
+ 6.944045,
  1,
  "e80f09c0-c325-48d9-adf3-bb1cbc49b3fa"
  ],
@@ -846,10 +3935,10 @@
  "type": "dataset"
  },
  {
- "_score": 7.30937,
+ "_score": 7.3065042,
  "_sort": [
  1790883868687,
- 7.30937,
+ 7.3065042,
  3,
  "3a609018-a49f-4b41-b99c-725dfd033885"
  ],
@@ -1052,10 +4141,10 @@
  "type": "dataset"
  },
  {
- "_score": 7.3102083,
+ "_score": 7.30805,
  "_sort": [
  1790883867625,
- 7.3102083,
+ 7.30805,
  2,
  "9b7b6568-7fcb-46fb-95dd-2bdb1391e3e6"
  ],
@@ -1258,10 +4347,10 @@
  "type": "dataset"
  },
  {
- "_score": 7.5728865,
+ "_score": 7.5699234,
  "_sort": [
  1790883866570,
- 7.5728865,
+ 7.5699234,
  4,
  "42a1110b-f625-4873-9dbe-b6099917c16b"
  ],
@@ -1458,10 +4547,10 @@
  "type": "dataset"
  },
  {
- "_score": 7.516637,
+ "_score": 7.5142837,
  "_sort": [
  1790883865510,
- 7.516637,
+ 7.5142837,
  4,
  "7bf1ae2a-2deb-4e07-ba4d-b1a2873d3b5f"
  ],
@@ -1658,10 +4747,10 @@
  "type": "dataset"
  },
  {
- "_score": 7.30937,
+ "_score": 7.3065042,
  "_sort": [
  1790883864456,
- 7.30937,
+ 7.3065042,
  2,
  "a7394882-e8b7-402b-a424-03f6033cf91b"
  ],
@@ -1860,10 +4949,10 @@
  "type": "dataset"
  },
  {
- "_score": 7.295664,
+ "_score": 7.293432,
  "_sort": [
  1790883863377,
- 7.295664,
+ 7.293432,
  2,
  "0f6d95b8-c21e-4f7a-807a-5b3b1e6bbf43"
  ],
@@ -2062,10 +5151,10 @@
  "type": "dataset"
  },
  {
- "_score": 7.30937,
+ "_score": 7.3065042,
  "_sort": [
  1790883862205,
- 7.30937,
+ 7.3065042,
  6,
  "9da48ca3-ae6b-49fa-a463-fba1c40b4e61"
  ],
@@ -2264,10 +5353,10 @@
  "type": "dataset"
  },
  {
- "_score": 7.3102083,
+ "_score": 7.30805,
  "_sort": [
  1790883861112,
- 7.3102083,
+ 7.30805,
  3,
  "39e17d42-f65e-494c-b3bd-423301da523f"
  ],
@@ -2466,10 +5555,10 @@
  "type": "dataset"
  },
  {
- "_score": 43.426697,
+ "_score": 43.42698,
  "_sort": [
  1790883855815,
- 43.426697,
+ 43.42698,
  1,
  "44a24135-441c-47ee-a34a-1ac17594708b"
  ],
@@ -2483,4506 +5572,4 @@
  "hasEmail": "mailto:osd.pentagon.ousd-atl.mbx.disdi-help-desk@mail.mil"
  },
  "describedByType": "application/octet-stream",
- "description": "The Military Bases dataset was last updated on November 11, 2025 and are defined by Fiscal Year 2024 data, from the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment and is part of the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT)/Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) National Transportation Atlas Database (NTAD). The dataset depicts the authoritative locations of the most commonly known Department of Defense (DoD) sites, installations, ranges, and training areas world-wide. These sites encompass land which is federally owned or otherwise managed. This dataset was created from source data provided by the four Military Service Component headquarters and was compiled by the Defense Installation Spatial Data Infrastructure (DISDI) Program within the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment. Only sites reported in the BSR or released in a map supplementing the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act of 2018 (FIRRMA) Real Estate Regulation (31 CFR Part 802) were considered for inclusion. This list does not necessarily represent a comprehensive collection of all Department of Defense facilities. For inventory purposes, installations are comprised of sites, where a site is defined as a specific geographic location of federally owned or managed land and is assigned to military installation. DoD installations are commonly referred to as a base, camp, post, station, yard, center, homeport facility for any ship, or other activity under the jurisdiction, custody, control of the DoD.\n\nWhile every attempt has been made to provide the best available data quality, this data set is intended for use at mapping scales between 1:50,000 and 1:3,000,000. For this reason, boundaries in this data set may not perfectly align with DoD site boundaries depicted in other federal data sources. Maps produced at a scale of 1:50,000 or smaller which otherwise comply with National Map Accuracy Standards, will remain compliant when this data is incorporated. Boundary data is most suitable for larger scale maps; point locations are better suited for mapping scales between 1:250,000 and 1:3,000,000.\n\nIf a site is part of a Joint Base (effective/designated on 1 October, 2010) as established under the 2005 Base Realignment and Closure process, it is attributed with the name of the Joint Base. All sites comprising a Joint Base are also attributed to the responsible DoD Component, which is not necessarily the pre-2005 Component responsible for the site. A data dictionary, or other source of attribute information, is accessible at https://doi.org/10.21949/1529039",
- "distribution": [
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.21949/1522149",
- "describedByType": "application/octet-stream",
- "description": "Web page to view and download dataset. The file download formats available include: ESRI File Geodatabase or Shapefile, GeoPackage, Comma-Seperated Values (CSV), Microsoft Excel, GeoJSON, KML, Feature Collection, and SQLite Geodatabase.",
- "mediaType": "text/html",
- "title": "Open Data Catalog"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.21949/1522151",
- "describedByType": "application/octet-stream",
- "description": "complies with OGC WFS Map Service for visualizing geospatial information",
- "mediaType": "text/html",
- "title": "ArcGIS REST Services Directory Feature Server (WFS)"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.21949/1520817",
- "describedByType": "application/octet-stream",
- "description": "ZIP",
- "mediaType": "text/html",
- "title": "Repository and Open Science Access Portal (ROSA P) NTAD Archive Collection"
- }
- ],
- "identifier": "https://transtats.bts.gov/NTADmetadata/Automated/USDOT_BTS_NTAD_Military_Bases.xml",
- "isPartOf": "National Transportation Atlas Database",
- "issued": "2010-06-30T00:00:00.000+00:00",
- "keyword": [
- "NTAD",
- "National Transportation Atlas Database",
- "National",
- "Transportation",
- "Atlas",
- "Database",
- "vector",
- "polygon",
- "Administrative",
- "Boundary",
- "Defense",
- "DoD",
- "Sites",
- "Installations",
- "Ranges",
- "Training Areas",
- "BRAC",
- "Joint",
- "Base",
- "Structure",
- "Report",
- "Federal",
- "Lands",
- "Air",
- "Force",
- "Army",
- "Navy",
- "Marine Corps",
- "Intelligence",
- "Military",
- "DISDI",
- "WHS",
- "National Guard",
- "FIRRMA",
- "Space",
- "USA",
- "National"
- ],
- "language": [],
- "license": "https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/",
- "modified": "2025-11-13T00:00:00.000+00:00",
- "publisher": {
- "@type": "org:Organization",
- "name": "Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment"
- },
- "rights": "otherRestrictions",
- "spatial": "174.15651899812184,13.309109406761769,-168.01305372329395,71.34432336790367",
- "theme": [
- "geospatial"
- ],
- "title": "Military Bases"
- },
- "description": "The Military Bases dataset was last updated on November 11, 2025 and are defined by Fiscal Year 2024 data, from the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment and is part of the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT)/Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) National Transportation Atlas Database (NTAD). The dataset depicts the authoritative locations of the most commonly known Department of Defense (DoD) sites, installations, ranges, and training areas world-wide. These sites encompass land which is federally owned or otherwise managed. This dataset was created from source data provided by the four Military Service Component headquarters and was compiled by the Defense Installation Spatial Data Infrastructure (DISDI) Program within the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment. Only sites reported in the BSR or released in a map supplementing the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act of 2018 (FIRRMA) Real Estate Regulation (31 CFR Part 802) were considered for inclusion. This list does not necessarily represent a comprehensive collection of all Department of Defense facilities. For inventory purposes, installations are comprised of sites, where a site is defined as a specific geographic location of federally owned or managed land and is assigned to military installation. DoD installations are commonly referred to as a base, camp, post, station, yard, center, homeport facility for any ship, or other activity under the jurisdiction, custody, control of the DoD.\n\nWhile every attempt has been made to provide the best available data quality, this data set is intended for use at mapping scales between 1:50,000 and 1:3,000,000. For this reason, boundaries in this data set may not perfectly align with DoD site boundaries depicted in other federal data sources. Maps produced at a scale of 1:50,000 or smaller which otherwise comply with National Map Accuracy Standards, will remain compliant when this data is incorporated. Boundary data is most suitable for larger scale maps; point locations are better suited for mapping scales between 1:250,000 and 1:3,000,000.\n\nIf a site is part of a Joint Base (effective/designated on 1 October, 2010) as established under the 2005 Base Realignment and Closure process, it is attributed with the name of the Joint Base. All sites comprising a Joint Base are also attributed to the responsible DoD Component, which is not necessarily the pre-2005 Component responsible for the site. A data dictionary, or other source of attribute information, is accessible at https://doi.org/10.21949/1529039",
- "distribution_titles": [
- "Open Data Catalog",
- "ArcGIS REST Services Directory Feature Server (WFS)",
- "Repository and Open Science Access Portal (ROSA P) NTAD Archive Collection"
- ],
- "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/18255bad-1c2f-4644-83c8-148fcc6f5a10",
- "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/18255bad-1c2f-4644-83c8-148fcc6f5a10/raw",
- "harvest_record_transformed": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/18255bad-1c2f-4644-83c8-148fcc6f5a10/transformed",
- "has_download": false,
- "has_spatial": true,
- "identifier": "https://transtats.bts.gov/NTADmetadata/Automated/USDOT_BTS_NTAD_Military_Bases.xml",
- "keyword": [
- "NTAD",
- "National Transportation Atlas Database",
- "National",
- "Transportation",
- "Atlas",
- "Database",
- "vector",
- "polygon",
- "Administrative",
- "Boundary",
- "Defense",
- "DoD",
- "Sites",
- "Installations",
- "Ranges",
- "Training Areas",
- "BRAC",
- "Joint",
- "Base",
- "Structure",
- "Report",
- "Federal",
- "Lands",
- "Air",
- "Force",
- "Army",
- "Navy",
- "Marine Corps",
- "Intelligence",
- "Military",
- "DISDI",
- "WHS",
- "National Guard",
- "FIRRMA",
- "Space",
- "USA",
- "National"
- ],
- "last_harvested_date": "2026-10-01T19:44:15.815796",
- "organization": {
- "aliases": [
- "dept"
- ],
- "code_repo_exempt": false,
- "code_repo_url": null,
- "description": null,
- "id": "c549d5ce-2b93-4397-ab76-aa2b31d9983a",
- "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/refs/heads/master/dot.png",
- "name": "Department of Transportation",
- "organization_type": "Federal Government",
- "slug": "dot"
- },
- "parent_identifier": null,
- "popularity": 1,
- "publisher": "Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment",
- "slug": "military-bases-0d6ee",
- "spatial_centroid": {
- "lat": 42.32671638733272,
- "lon": 0.6443449547777618
- },
- "spatial_shape": {
- "coordinates": [
- [
- [
- [
- 174.15651899812184,
- 13.309109406761769
- ],
- [
- 180.0,
- 13.309109406761769
- ],
- [
- 180.0,
- 71.34432336790367
- ],
- [
- 174.15651899812184,
- 71.34432336790367
- ],
- [
- 174.15651899812184,
- 13.309109406761769
- ]
- ]
- ],
- [
- [
- [
- -180.0,
- 71.34432336790367
- ],
- [
- -180.0,
- 13.309109406761769
- ],
- [
- -168.01305372329395,
- 13.309109406761769
- ],
- [
- -168.01305372329395,
- 71.34432336790367
- ],
- [
- -180.0,
- 71.34432336790367
- ]
- ]
- ]
- ],
- "type": "MultiPolygon"
- },
- "theme": [
- "geospatial"
- ],
- "title": "Military Bases",
- "type": "dataset"
- },
- {
- "_score": 10.642279,
- "_sort": [
- 1790822243368,
- 10.642279,
- 1,
- "92f00b1d-0348-4cfb-ae7a-b6a0f9f427da"
- ],
- "access_level": "public",
- "dcat": {
- "accessLevel": "public",
- "bureauCode": [
- "010:12"
- ],
- "contactPoint": {
- "@type": "vcard:Contact",
- "fn": "Customer Service Representative",
- "hasEmail": "mailto:custserv@usgs.gov"
- },
- "description": "Short-term FIRM (2016-2024), Long-term FIRM (1985-2024), and Habitat Invasive Risk (HIR) quantify wildfire-driven invasive annual grass responses across western U.S. rangelands. Context - Understanding the relationship between Exotic Annual Grass (EAG) expansion, drought, and fire frequency across western US rangelands is complex, but critical for maintaining ecological integrity. Objectives - We quantified the impacts of wildfire on EAGs, with emphasis on understanding the factors driving the spatial and temporal variability of those impacts, highlighting the role of drought. Methods - We investigate two study periods using 1985-2024 and 2016-2024 EAG cover datasets to better understand EAG dynamics in relation to fire. We, 1) leverage mapped EAG cover responses to fire in the context of various biophysical variables to model expected change in EAG cover (ΔG) given a fire in a specific location, even if no fire has occurred in that location in the period of record; 2) evaluate the influence of drought and other biophysical variables on the ΔG; 3) combine our ΔG values with burn probability and ecological integrity data to evaluate the profile of EAG risk due to fire in sagebrush habitats. Results - Our results show that fire impacts on EAG are often delayed, with limited effects in the first post-fire year followed by increasing cover over subsequent years. Importantly, areas with low pre-fire EAG cover exhibited the greatest potential for post-fire increases, whereas heavily invaded sites showed lower incremental responses, suggesting saturation or carrying-capacity constraints. Conclusions - Understanding the connections among EAGs, drought, and wildfire is critical for maintaining the ecological integrity of western rangelands. Identifying the magnitude of fire impacts to EAG cover provides critical insight for land managers.",
- "distribution": [
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.5066/P1X4F8FS",
- "description": "Landing page for access to the data",
- "format": "XML",
- "mediaType": "application/http",
- "title": "Digital Data"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "description": "The metadata original format",
- "downloadURL": "https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.6a8473f71ba49b3133cd7edc.xml",
- "format": "XML",
- "mediaType": "text/xml",
- "title": "Original Metadata"
- }
- ],
- "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6a8473f71ba49b3133cd7edc",
- "keyword": [
- "FIRM",
- "HIR",
- "RCMAP",
- "USGS:6a8473f71ba49b3133cd7edc",
- "environment",
- "rangelands",
- "wildfires"
- ],
- "modified": "2026-09-28T00:00:00Z",
- "publisher": {
- "@type": "org:Organization",
- "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"
- },
- "spatial": "-127.2344, 26.5987, -99.6774, 50.9200",
- "theme": [
- "geospatial"
- ],
- "title": "Fire Invasive Response Metric (FIRM) and Habitat Invasive Risk (HIR) for Western U.S. Rangelands 1985 - 2024"
- },
- "description": "Short-term FIRM (2016-2024), Long-term FIRM (1985-2024), and Habitat Invasive Risk (HIR) quantify wildfire-driven invasive annual grass responses across western U.S. rangelands. Context - Understanding the relationship between Exotic Annual Grass (EAG) expansion, drought, and fire frequency across western US rangelands is complex, but critical for maintaining ecological integrity. Objectives - We quantified the impacts of wildfire on EAGs, with emphasis on understanding the factors driving the spatial and temporal variability of those impacts, highlighting the role of drought. Methods - We investigate two study periods using 1985-2024 and 2016-2024 EAG cover datasets to better understand EAG dynamics in relation to fire. We, 1) leverage mapped EAG cover responses to fire in the context of various biophysical variables to model expected change in EAG cover (ΔG) given a fire in a specific location, even if no fire has occurred in that location in the period of record; 2) evaluate the influence of drought and other biophysical variables on the ΔG; 3) combine our ΔG values with burn probability and ecological integrity data to evaluate the profile of EAG risk due to fire in sagebrush habitats. Results - Our results show that fire impacts on EAG are often delayed, with limited effects in the first post-fire year followed by increasing cover over subsequent years. Importantly, areas with low pre-fire EAG cover exhibited the greatest potential for post-fire increases, whereas heavily invaded sites showed lower incremental responses, suggesting saturation or carrying-capacity constraints. Conclusions - Understanding the connections among EAGs, drought, and wildfire is critical for maintaining the ecological integrity of western rangelands. Identifying the magnitude of fire impacts to EAG cover provides critical insight for land managers.",
- "distribution_titles": [
- "Digital Data",
- "Original Metadata"
- ],
- "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/12dae967-91f3-4a18-9200-38119061971c",
- "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/12dae967-91f3-4a18-9200-38119061971c/raw",
- "has_download": true,
- "has_spatial": true,
- "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6a8473f71ba49b3133cd7edc",
- "keyword": [
- "FIRM",
- "HIR",
- "RCMAP",
- "USGS:6a8473f71ba49b3133cd7edc",
- "environment",
- "rangelands",
- "wildfires"
- ],
- "last_harvested_date": "2026-10-01T02:37:23.368860",
- "organization": {
- "aliases": [
- "dept"
- ],
- "code_repo_exempt": false,
- "code_repo_url": null,
- "description": null,
- "id": "143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8",
- "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png",
- "name": "Department of the Interior",
- "organization_type": "Federal Government",
- "slug": "doi"
- },
- "parent_identifier": null,
- "popularity": 1,
- "publisher": "U.S. Geological Survey",
- "slug": "fire-invasive-response-metric-firm-and-habitat-invasive-risk-hir-for-western-u-s-1985-2024",
- "spatial_centroid": {
- "lat": 36.32722,
- "lon": -116.2116
- },
- "spatial_shape": {
- "coordinates": [
- [
- [
- -127.2344,
- 26.5987
- ],
- [
- -127.2344,
- 50.92
- ],
- [
- -99.6774,
- 50.92
- ],
- [
- -99.6774,
- 26.5987
- ],
- [
- -127.2344,
- 26.5987
- ]
- ]
- ],
- "type": "Polygon"
- },
- "theme": [
- "geospatial"
- ],
- "title": "Fire Invasive Response Metric (FIRM) and Habitat Invasive Risk (HIR) for Western U.S. Rangelands 1985 - 2024",
- "type": "dataset"
- },
- {
- "_score": 25.477396,
- "_sort": [
- 1790822204753,
- 25.477396,
- 4,
- "b8736e26-bf11-4415-8561-ac9c6f294015"
- ],
- "access_level": "public",
- "dcat": {
- "accessLevel": "public",
- "bureauCode": [
- "010:12"
- ],
- "contactPoint": {
- "@type": "vcard:Contact",
- "fn": "FRESC Metadata Coordinator",
- "hasEmail": "mailto:fresh_outreach@usgs.gov"
- },
- "description": "The 2022 Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Bill - the appropriations bill that funds the USGS - established a regional Integrated Water Availability Assessment study program in the Great Basin of the American West. Twenty saline lakes across California, Nevada, Oregon, and Utah were identified by USGS partners as priority ecosystems. They include: California: Eagle Lake, Honey Lake, Mono Lake, Owens Lake; Utah: The Great Salt Lake and Sevier Lake; Nevada: Carson Lake, Carson Sink, Franklin Lake, Pyramid Lake, Ruby Lake, Walker Lake, Winnemucca Lake; Oregon: Lake Abert, Harney Lake, Malheur Lake, Silver Lake, Summer Lake, the Warner Lakes; California/Oregon: Goose Lake",
- "distribution": [
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.5066/P13QP2TK",
- "description": "Landing page for access to the data",
- "format": "XML",
- "mediaType": "application/http",
- "title": "Digital Data"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "description": "The metadata original format",
- "downloadURL": "https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.667f1a25d34e2cb7853eaf4f.xml",
- "format": "XML",
- "mediaType": "text/xml",
- "title": "Original Metadata"
- }
- ],
- "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_667f1a25d34e2cb7853eaf4f",
- "keyword": [
- "California",
- "Nevada",
- "Oregon",
- "USGS:667f1a25d34e2cb7853eaf4f",
- "Utah",
- "aquatic ecosystems",
- "biota",
- "desert ecosystems",
- "environment",
- "geospatial datasets",
- "inlandWaters",
- "shrubland ecosystems",
- "surface water (non-marine)"
- ],
- "modified": "2026-09-28T00:00:00Z",
- "publisher": {
- "@type": "org:Organization",
- "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"
- },
- "spatial": "-121.7204, 36.0523, -111.1371, 44.4412",
- "theme": [
- "geospatial"
- ],
- "title": "Saline Lake Ecosystems IWAA Lakes (ver. 2.0, September 2026)"
- },
- "description": "The 2022 Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Bill - the appropriations bill that funds the USGS - established a regional Integrated Water Availability Assessment study program in the Great Basin of the American West. Twenty saline lakes across California, Nevada, Oregon, and Utah were identified by USGS partners as priority ecosystems. They include: California: Eagle Lake, Honey Lake, Mono Lake, Owens Lake; Utah: The Great Salt Lake and Sevier Lake; Nevada: Carson Lake, Carson Sink, Franklin Lake, Pyramid Lake, Ruby Lake, Walker Lake, Winnemucca Lake; Oregon: Lake Abert, Harney Lake, Malheur Lake, Silver Lake, Summer Lake, the Warner Lakes; California/Oregon: Goose Lake",
- "distribution_titles": [
- "Digital Data",
- "Original Metadata"
- ],
- "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/fa7b3d51-9b62-4ceb-b02b-1749f329c80c",
- "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/fa7b3d51-9b62-4ceb-b02b-1749f329c80c/raw",
- "has_download": true,
- "has_spatial": true,
- "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_667f1a25d34e2cb7853eaf4f",
- "keyword": [
- "California",
- "Nevada",
- "Oregon",
- "USGS:667f1a25d34e2cb7853eaf4f",
- "Utah",
- "aquatic ecosystems",
- "biota",
- "desert ecosystems",
- "environment",
- "geospatial datasets",
- "inlandWaters",
- "shrubland ecosystems",
- "surface water (non-marine)"
- ],
- "last_harvested_date": "2026-10-01T02:36:44.753304",
- "organization": {
- "aliases": [
- "dept"
- ],
- "code_repo_exempt": false,
- "code_repo_url": null,
- "description": null,
- "id": "143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8",
- "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png",
- "name": "Department of the Interior",
- "organization_type": "Federal Government",
- "slug": "doi"
- },
- "parent_identifier": null,
- "popularity": 4,
- "publisher": "U.S. Geological Survey",
- "slug": "saline-lake-ecosystems-iwaa-lakes",
- "spatial_centroid": {
- "lat": 39.40786000000001,
- "lon": -117.48707999999999
- },
- "spatial_shape": {
- "coordinates": [
- [
- [
- -121.7204,
- 36.0523
- ],
- [
- -121.7204,
- 44.4412
- ],
- [
- -111.1371,
- 44.4412
- ],
- [
- -111.1371,
- 36.0523
- ],
- [
- -121.7204,
- 36.0523
- ]
- ]
- ],
- "type": "Polygon"
- },
- "theme": [
- "geospatial"
- ],
- "title": "Saline Lake Ecosystems IWAA Lakes (ver. 2.0, September 2026)",
- "type": "dataset"
- },
- {
- "_score": 9.839901,
- "_sort": [
- 1790821374605,
- 9.839901,
- 0,
- "0fcde80b-3a68-4639-8f70-7053cead0e68"
- ],
- "access_level": "public",
- "dcat": {
- "accessLevel": "public",
- "bureauCode": [
- "010:12"
- ],
- "contactPoint": {
- "@type": "vcard:Contact",
- "fn": "Guillaume Mauger",
- "hasEmail": "mailto:gmauger@uw.edu"
- },
- "description": "This dataset contains netcdf files with the peak flow statistics associated with culvert design, for the state of Washington.",
- "distribution": [
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.5066/P13U2YZ2",
- "description": "Landing page for access to the data",
- "format": "XML",
- "mediaType": "application/http",
- "title": "Digital Data"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "description": "The metadata original format",
- "downloadURL": "https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.624f2a6ad34e21f82769b53f.xml",
- "format": "XML",
- "mediaType": "text/xml",
- "title": "Original Metadata"
- }
- ],
- "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_624f2a6ad34e21f82769b53f",
- "keyword": [
- "USGS:624f2a6ad34e21f82769b53f",
- "adaptation",
- "biota",
- "climate change",
- "culvert",
- "environment",
- "geospatial datasets",
- "inland waterways",
- "streamflow",
- "structure"
- ],
- "modified": "2026-09-28T00:00:00Z",
- "publisher": {
- "@type": "org:Organization",
- "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"
- },
- "spatial": "-124.7600, 45.5400, -116.9100, 49.0000",
- "theme": [
- "geospatial"
- ],
- "title": "Historical and Future Peak Flow Statistics for Washington State, derived from VIC modeling and Dynamically Downscaled CMIP5 Projections"
- },
- "description": "This dataset contains netcdf files with the peak flow statistics associated with culvert design, for the state of Washington.",
- "distribution_titles": [
- "Digital Data",
- "Original Metadata"
- ],
- "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/5a7bbeca-8b64-47a0-ac98-a93f39e078e0",
- "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/5a7bbeca-8b64-47a0-ac98-a93f39e078e0/raw",
- "has_download": true,
- "has_spatial": true,
- "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_624f2a6ad34e21f82769b53f",
- "keyword": [
- "USGS:624f2a6ad34e21f82769b53f",
- "adaptation",
- "biota",
- "climate change",
- "culvert",
- "environment",
- "geospatial datasets",
- "inland waterways",
- "streamflow",
- "structure"
- ],
- "last_harvested_date": "2026-10-01T02:22:54.605698",
- "organization": {
- "aliases": [
- "dept"
- ],
- "code_repo_exempt": false,
- "code_repo_url": null,
- "description": null,
- "id": "143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8",
- "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png",
- "name": "Department of the Interior",
- "organization_type": "Federal Government",
- "slug": "doi"
- },
- "parent_identifier": null,
- "popularity": 0,
- "publisher": "U.S. Geological Survey",
- "slug": "historical-and-future-peak-flow-statistics-for-washington-state-derived-from-vic-modeling-",
- "spatial_centroid": {
- "lat": 46.924,
- "lon": -121.62
- },
- "spatial_shape": {
- "coordinates": [
- [
- [
- -124.76,
- 45.54
- ],
- [
- -124.76,
- 49.0
- ],
- [
- -116.91,
- 49.0
- ],
- [
- -116.91,
- 45.54
- ],
- [
- -124.76,
- 45.54
- ]
- ]
- ],
- "type": "Polygon"
- },
- "theme": [
- "geospatial"
- ],
- "title": "Historical and Future Peak Flow Statistics for Washington State, derived from VIC modeling and Dynamically Downscaled CMIP5 Projections",
- "type": "dataset"
- },
- {
- "_score": 5.2862988,
- "_sort": [
- 1790821184130,
- 5.2862988,
- 0,
- "c7b2751c-ea58-4a1f-bb0e-2e6ac2901cea"
- ],
- "access_level": "public",
- "dcat": {
- "accessLevel": "public",
- "bureauCode": [
- "010:12"
- ],
- "contactPoint": {
- "@type": "vcard:Contact",
- "fn": "Rebecca M Gorney",
- "hasEmail": "mailto:rgorney@usgs.gov"
- },
- "description": "This data release contains analytical results from an experiment examining biofouling of solid phase adsorption toxin tracking (SPATT) samplers deployed between July and September 2024 in two lakes in Central Park (The Lake and Turtle Pond) in New York City, New York, and at an urban wetland in Nashville, Tennessee (Tennessee State University [TSU] wetland). At each site, SPATT samplers were deployed under different conditions (sun and shade) and with or without a mechanical biofouling deterrent (105-micrometer copper mesh). The release includes cyanotoxin concentrations measured in SPATT extract (from the adsorbent resin) and SPATT biofilm (material scraped from the sampler surface), determined by liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS and LC-MS). It also includes phytoplankton identification and enumeration data from ambient (native) water and from SPATT biofilm.",
- "distribution": [
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.5066/P145M7VZ",
- "description": "Landing page for access to the data",
- "format": "XML",
- "mediaType": "application/http",
- "title": "Digital Data"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "description": "The metadata original format",
- "downloadURL": "https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.691cecf1d4be021d1d89b387.xml",
- "format": "XML",
- "mediaType": "text/xml",
- "title": "Original Metadata"
- }
- ],
- "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_691cecf1d4be021d1d89b387",
- "keyword": [
- "Aquatic Biology",
- "Central Park",
- "Davidson",
- "LC-MS/MS",
- "Limnology",
- "Nashville",
- "New York",
- "SPATT",
- "Tennessee",
- "The Lake",
- "The Lake Bank Rock Bay IN Central Park at NY NY (Site ID: 404644073581801)",
- "The Lake at Central Park",
- "Tsu Upper Wetland a North Nashville TN (Site ID: 361028086492601)",
- "Turtle Pond",
- "Turtle Pond Overlook IN Central Park NY NY (Site ID: 404648073580601)",
- "USGS:691cecf1d4be021d1d89b387",
- "United States",
- "Water Resources",
- "algae",
- "algal blooms",
- "anatoxin",
- "biota",
- "congener",
- "cyanobacteria",
- "cyanotoxin",
- "cylindrospermopsin",
- "ecotoxicology",
- "environment",
- "environmental proxies",
- "fresh water (surface)",
- "freshwater ecosystems",
- "hazards",
- "health",
- "limnology",
- "mass spectrometry",
- "microcystin",
- "periphyton",
- "phytoplankton",
- "solid phase adsorption toxin tracking",
- "surface water quality",
- "water Quality",
- "water Resources"
- ],
- "modified": "2026-09-28T00:00:00Z",
- "publisher": {
- "@type": "org:Organization",
- "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"
- },
- "spatial": "-87.3633, 35.6751, -73.4546, 41.0794",
- "theme": [
- "geospatial"
- ],
- "title": "Anti-biofouling strategies for solid phase adsorption toxin tracking (SPATT) in two New York lakes and a Tennessee wetland in 2024"
- },
- "description": "This data release contains analytical results from an experiment examining biofouling of solid phase adsorption toxin tracking (SPATT) samplers deployed between July and September 2024 in two lakes in Central Park (The Lake and Turtle Pond) in New York City, New York, and at an urban wetland in Nashville, Tennessee (Tennessee State University [TSU] wetland). At each site, SPATT samplers were deployed under different conditions (sun and shade) and with or without a mechanical biofouling deterrent (105-micrometer copper mesh). The release includes cyanotoxin concentrations measured in SPATT extract (from the adsorbent resin) and SPATT biofilm (material scraped from the sampler surface), determined by liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS and LC-MS). It also includes phytoplankton identification and enumeration data from ambient (native) water and from SPATT biofilm.",
- "distribution_titles": [
- "Digital Data",
- "Original Metadata"
- ],
- "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/6e1bfa0d-3ffe-4ed6-bd68-de4504641601",
- "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/6e1bfa0d-3ffe-4ed6-bd68-de4504641601/raw",
- "has_download": true,
- "has_spatial": true,
- "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_691cecf1d4be021d1d89b387",
- "keyword": [
- "Aquatic Biology",
- "Central Park",
- "Davidson",
- "LC-MS/MS",
- "Limnology",
- "Nashville",
- "New York",
- "SPATT",
- "Tennessee",
- "The Lake",
- "The Lake Bank Rock Bay IN Central Park at NY NY (Site ID: 404644073581801)",
- "The Lake at Central Park",
- "Tsu Upper Wetland a North Nashville TN (Site ID: 361028086492601)",
- "Turtle Pond",
- "Turtle Pond Overlook IN Central Park NY NY (Site ID: 404648073580601)",
- "USGS:691cecf1d4be021d1d89b387",
- "United States",
- "Water Resources",
- "algae",
- "algal blooms",
- "anatoxin",
- "biota",
- "congener",
- "cyanobacteria",
- "cyanotoxin",
- "cylindrospermopsin",
- "ecotoxicology",
- "environment",
- "environmental proxies",
- "fresh water (surface)",
- "freshwater ecosystems",
- "hazards",
- "health",
- "limnology",
- "mass spectrometry",
- "microcystin",
- "periphyton",
- "phytoplankton",
- "solid phase adsorption toxin tracking",
- "surface water quality",
- "water Quality",
- "water Resources"
- ],
- "last_harvested_date": "2026-10-01T02:19:44.130569",
- "organization": {
- "aliases": [
- "dept"
- ],
- "code_repo_exempt": false,
- "code_repo_url": null,
- "description": null,
- "id": "143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8",
- "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png",
- "name": "Department of the Interior",
- "organization_type": "Federal Government",
- "slug": "doi"
- },
- "parent_identifier": null,
- "popularity": 0,
- "publisher": "U.S. Geological Survey",
- "slug": "anti-biofouling-strategies-for-solid-phase-adsorption-toxin-tracking-spatt-in-two-new-2024",
- "spatial_centroid": {
- "lat": 37.83682,
- "lon": -81.79982
- },
- "spatial_shape": {
- "coordinates": [
- [
- [
- -87.3633,
- 35.6751
- ],
- [
- -87.3633,
- 41.0794
- ],
- [
- -73.4546,
- 41.0794
- ],
- [
- -73.4546,
- 35.6751
- ],
- [
- -87.3633,
- 35.6751
- ]
- ]
- ],
- "type": "Polygon"
- },
- "theme": [
- "geospatial"
- ],
- "title": "Anti-biofouling strategies for solid phase adsorption toxin tracking (SPATT) in two New York lakes and a Tennessee wetland in 2024",
- "type": "dataset"
- },
- {
- "_score": 10.692866,
- "_sort": [
- 1790820766042,
- 10.692866,
- 4,
- "ce27115f-f42b-4073-9d4d-d72d4123e17c"
- ],
- "access_level": "public",
- "dcat": {
- "accessLevel": "public",
- "bureauCode": [
- "010:12"
- ],
- "contactPoint": {
- "@type": "vcard:Contact",
- "fn": "David J Riecks Soucek",
- "hasEmail": "mailto:drieckssoucek@usgs.gov"
- },
- "description": "This data set includes survival data for arctic grayling exposed to various concentrations of 6PPD-quinone (6PPDQ) for up to 96 hours. Concurrently collected analytical water chemistry and general water quality measurements are included. In addition, tissue concentrations of 6PPDQ for fish that died during exposure and those that survived to the end of the exposure are included.",
- "distribution": [
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.5066/P133J2YA",
- "description": "Landing page for access to the data",
- "format": "XML",
- "mediaType": "application/http",
- "title": "Digital Data"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "description": "The metadata original format",
- "downloadURL": "https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.699c93eab66b01358883e3ac.xml",
- "format": "XML",
- "mediaType": "text/xml",
- "title": "Original Metadata"
- }
- ],
- "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_699c93eab66b01358883e3ac",
- "keyword": [
- "Contamination and pollution",
- "Ecotoxicology",
- "Fish",
- "USGS:699c93eab66b01358883e3ac",
- "environment",
- "farming"
- ],
- "modified": "2026-09-28T00:00:00Z",
- "publisher": {
- "@type": "org:Organization",
- "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"
- },
- "spatial": "-92.284312, 38.910784, -92.274450, 38.912612",
- "theme": [
- "geospatial"
- ],
- "title": "Survival and bioaccumulation data for arctic grayling (Thymallus arcticus) exposed to 6PPDQ"
- },
- "description": "This data set includes survival data for arctic grayling exposed to various concentrations of 6PPD-quinone (6PPDQ) for up to 96 hours. Concurrently collected analytical water chemistry and general water quality measurements are included. In addition, tissue concentrations of 6PPDQ for fish that died during exposure and those that survived to the end of the exposure are included.",
- "distribution_titles": [
- "Digital Data",
- "Original Metadata"
- ],
- "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/4b29a3f9-9e0b-4554-a8c4-2e1715fe6914",
- "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/4b29a3f9-9e0b-4554-a8c4-2e1715fe6914/raw",
- "has_download": true,
- "has_spatial": true,
- "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_699c93eab66b01358883e3ac",
- "keyword": [
- "Contamination and pollution",
- "Ecotoxicology",
- "Fish",
- "USGS:699c93eab66b01358883e3ac",
- "environment",
- "farming"
- ],
- "last_harvested_date": "2026-10-01T02:12:46.042582",
- "organization": {
- "aliases": [
- "dept"
- ],
- "code_repo_exempt": false,
- "code_repo_url": null,
- "description": null,
- "id": "143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8",
- "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png",
- "name": "Department of the Interior",
- "organization_type": "Federal Government",
- "slug": "doi"
- },
- "parent_identifier": null,
- "popularity": 4,
- "publisher": "U.S. Geological Survey",
- "slug": "survival-and-bioaccumulation-data-for-arctic-grayling-thymallus-arcticus-exposed-to-6ppdq",
- "spatial_centroid": {
- "lat": 38.911515200000004,
- "lon": -92.2803672
- },
- "spatial_shape": {
- "coordinates": [
- [
- [
- -92.284312,
- 38.910784
- ],
- [
- -92.284312,
- 38.912612
- ],
- [
- -92.27445,
- 38.912612
- ],
- [
- -92.27445,
- 38.910784
- ],
- [
- -92.284312,
- 38.910784
- ]
- ]
- ],
- "type": "Polygon"
- },
- "theme": [
- "geospatial"
- ],
- "title": "Survival and bioaccumulation data for arctic grayling (Thymallus arcticus) exposed to 6PPDQ",
- "type": "dataset"
- },
- {
- "_score": 9.501061,
- "_sort": [
- 1790819909336,
- 9.501061,
- 0,
- "c4170fa3-939e-496d-a857-9731e41d87d4"
- ],
- "access_level": "public",
- "dcat": {
- "accessLevel": "public",
- "bureauCode": [
- "010:12"
- ],
- "contactPoint": {
- "@type": "vcard:Contact",
- "fn": "Andy Bock",
- "hasEmail": "mailto:abock@usgs.gov"
- },
- "description": "The National Hydrologic Geospatial Fabric Reference and Derived Hydrofabrics is a geospatial dataset of connected rivers, streams, lakes, catchments, hydrologic locations, and relevant attributes to support multi-scale and integrative hydrologic modeling and analysis.\nThis child dataset contains features and attributes representing the National Hydrologic Geospatial Fabric Refactored Hydrofabric. The Refactored Hydrofabric is a processed version of the Reference Hydrofabric with a more uniform distribution of catchment size. The complexity of different models requires flexibility to create different spatial levels of resolution and detail. Catchments with flowpath-lengths shorter than the user-specified minimum length threshold that increase data volume and compute cost but don't add hydrologic fidelity have been consolidated into larger ones. Catchments whose flowpath lengths are longer than the user-specified maximum flowpath-length threshold are split apart to provide uniform fidelity and better represent network outlets such as streamgages. When refactoring, key hydrologic locations like stream gages are preserved precisely, unless they are specified specifically as split events.\nThis item contains an Open Geospatial Consortium geopackage (gpkg) containing refactored flowlines, catchments, and other layers for all of Conterminous United States CONUS (refactor_CONUS.gpkg). See the processing steps for specific refactoring details.",
- "distribution": [
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.5066/P9NFPB5S",
- "description": "Landing page for access to the data",
- "format": "XML",
- "mediaType": "application/http",
- "title": "Digital Data"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "description": "The metadata original format",
- "downloadURL": "https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.61fbfdced34e622189cb1b0a.xml",
- "format": "XML",
- "mediaType": "text/xml",
- "title": "Original Metadata"
- }
- ],
- "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_61fbfdced34e622189cb1b0a",
- "keyword": [
- "Geographic Information Systems",
- "Hydrologic Response Units",
- "Hydrologic modeling",
- "Points of Interest",
- "Routing Network",
- "USGS:61fbfdced34e622189cb1b0a",
- "environment",
- "geoscientificInformation",
- "inlandWaters"
- ],
- "modified": "2026-09-28T00:00:00Z",
- "publisher": {
- "@type": "org:Organization",
- "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"
- },
- "spatial": "-124.7337, 24.6304, -66.9496, 52.8800",
- "theme": [
- "geospatial"
- ],
- "title": "National Hydrologic Geospatial Fabric Refactored Hydrofabric"
- },
- "description": "The National Hydrologic Geospatial Fabric Reference and Derived Hydrofabrics is a geospatial dataset of connected rivers, streams, lakes, catchments, hydrologic locations, and relevant attributes to support multi-scale and integrative hydrologic modeling and analysis.\nThis child dataset contains features and attributes representing the National Hydrologic Geospatial Fabric Refactored Hydrofabric. The Refactored Hydrofabric is a processed version of the Reference Hydrofabric with a more uniform distribution of catchment size. The complexity of different models requires flexibility to create different spatial levels of resolution and detail. Catchments with flowpath-lengths shorter than the user-specified minimum length threshold that increase data volume and compute cost but don't add hydrologic fidelity have been consolidated into larger ones. Catchments whose flowpath lengths are longer than the user-specified maximum flowpath-length threshold are split apart to provide uniform fidelity and better represent network outlets such as streamgages. When refactoring, key hydrologic locations like stream gages are preserved precisely, unless they are specified specifically as split events.\nThis item contains an Open Geospatial Consortium geopackage (gpkg) containing refactored flowlines, catchments, and other layers for all of Conterminous United States CONUS (refactor_CONUS.gpkg). See the processing steps for specific refactoring details.",
- "distribution_titles": [
- "Digital Data",
- "Original Metadata"
- ],
- "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/06aaa4b3-3e6e-4470-a40b-28e065ef4d22",
- "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/06aaa4b3-3e6e-4470-a40b-28e065ef4d22/raw",
- "has_download": true,
- "has_spatial": true,
- "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_61fbfdced34e622189cb1b0a",
- "keyword": [
- "Geographic Information Systems",
- "Hydrologic Response Units",
- "Hydrologic modeling",
- "Points of Interest",
- "Routing Network",
- "USGS:61fbfdced34e622189cb1b0a",
- "environment",
- "geoscientificInformation",
- "inlandWaters"
- ],
- "last_harvested_date": "2026-10-01T01:58:29.336810",
- "organization": {
- "aliases": [
- "dept"
- ],
- "code_repo_exempt": false,
- "code_repo_url": null,
- "description": null,
- "id": "143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8",
- "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png",
- "name": "Department of the Interior",
- "organization_type": "Federal Government",
- "slug": "doi"
- },
- "parent_identifier": null,
- "popularity": 0,
- "publisher": "U.S. Geological Survey",
- "slug": "national-hydrologic-geospatial-fabric-refactored-hydrofabric",
- "spatial_centroid": {
- "lat": 35.930240000000005,
- "lon": -101.62006
- },
- "spatial_shape": {
- "coordinates": [
- [
- [
- -124.7337,
- 24.6304
- ],
- [
- -124.7337,
- 52.88
- ],
- [
- -66.9496,
- 52.88
- ],
- [
- -66.9496,
- 24.6304
- ],
- [
- -124.7337,
- 24.6304
- ]
- ]
- ],
- "type": "Polygon"
- },
- "theme": [
- "geospatial"
- ],
- "title": "National Hydrologic Geospatial Fabric Refactored Hydrofabric",
- "type": "dataset"
- },
- {
- "_score": 7.6175404,
- "_sort": [
- 1790819576520,
- 7.6175404,
- 1,
- "53cc3307-b797-44bd-b4a8-a54bed47446f"
- ],
- "access_level": "public",
- "dcat": {
- "accessLevel": "public",
- "bureauCode": [
- "010:12"
- ],
- "contactPoint": {
- "@type": "vcard:Contact",
- "fn": "Michael Osland",
- "hasEmail": "mailto:mosland@usgs.gov"
- },
- "description": "The northern Gulf of Mexico coast spans two major climate gradients and represents an excellent natural laboratory for developing climate-influenced ecological models. In this project, we used these zones of remarkable transition to develop macroclimate-based models for quantifying the regional responses of coastal wetland ecosystems to climate variation. In addition to providing important fish and wildlife habitat and supporting coastal food webs, these coastal wetlands provide many ecosystem goods and services including clean water, stable coastlines, food, recreational opportunities, and stored carbon. Our objective was to examine and forecast the effects of macroclimatic drivers on wetland ecosystem structure and function in the northern Gulf of Mexico.",
- "distribution": [
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.5066/F7J1017G",
- "description": "Landing page for access to the data",
- "format": "XML",
- "mediaType": "application/http",
- "title": "Digital Data"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "description": "The metadata original format",
- "downloadURL": "https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.57b240fce4b00148d3982cd0.xml",
- "format": "XML",
- "mediaType": "text/xml",
- "title": "Original Metadata"
- }
- ],
- "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_57b240fce4b00148d3982cd0",
- "keyword": [
- "Corpus Christi",
- "Galveston",
- "Grand Bay",
- "Gulf of Mexico",
- "Laguna Madre",
- "Port Aransas",
- "San Antonio",
- "Slidell",
- "State of Alabama",
- "State of Florida",
- "State of Louisiana",
- "State of Mississippi",
- "State of Texas",
- "Tampa Bay",
- "Ten Thousand Islands",
- "USGS:57b240fce4b00148d3982cd0",
- "Weeks Bay",
- "bulk density",
- "environment",
- "moisture",
- "soil",
- "soil organic matter"
- ],
- "modified": "2026-09-28T00:00:00Z",
- "publisher": {
- "@type": "org:Organization",
- "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"
- },
- "spatial": "-97.365203, 25.856967, -81.499719, 30.497478",
- "theme": [
- "geospatial"
- ],
- "title": "U.S. Gulf of Mexico coast (TX, MS, AL, and FL) Macroclimate Soil Data (2013-2014)"
- },
- "description": "The northern Gulf of Mexico coast spans two major climate gradients and represents an excellent natural laboratory for developing climate-influenced ecological models. In this project, we used these zones of remarkable transition to develop macroclimate-based models for quantifying the regional responses of coastal wetland ecosystems to climate variation. In addition to providing important fish and wildlife habitat and supporting coastal food webs, these coastal wetlands provide many ecosystem goods and services including clean water, stable coastlines, food, recreational opportunities, and stored carbon. Our objective was to examine and forecast the effects of macroclimatic drivers on wetland ecosystem structure and function in the northern Gulf of Mexico.",
- "distribution_titles": [
- "Digital Data",
- "Original Metadata"
- ],
- "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/d5e76c02-3210-44c3-ae21-53d506c89818",
- "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/d5e76c02-3210-44c3-ae21-53d506c89818/raw",
- "has_download": true,
- "has_spatial": true,
- "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_57b240fce4b00148d3982cd0",
- "keyword": [
- "Corpus Christi",
- "Galveston",
- "Grand Bay",
- "Gulf of Mexico",
- "Laguna Madre",
- "Port Aransas",
- "San Antonio",
- "Slidell",
- "State of Alabama",
- "State of Florida",
- "State of Louisiana",
- "State of Mississippi",
- "State of Texas",
- "Tampa Bay",
- "Ten Thousand Islands",
- "USGS:57b240fce4b00148d3982cd0",
- "Weeks Bay",
- "bulk density",
- "environment",
- "moisture",
- "soil",
- "soil organic matter"
- ],
- "last_harvested_date": "2026-10-01T01:52:56.520198",
- "organization": {
- "aliases": [
- "dept"
- ],
- "code_repo_exempt": false,
- "code_repo_url": null,
- "description": null,
- "id": "143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8",
- "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png",
- "name": "Department of the Interior",
- "organization_type": "Federal Government",
- "slug": "doi"
- },
- "parent_identifier": null,
- "popularity": 1,
- "publisher": "U.S. Geological Survey",
- "slug": "u-s-gulf-of-mexico-coast-tx-ms-al-and-fl-macroclimate-soil-data-2013-2014",
- "spatial_centroid": {
- "lat": 27.7131714,
- "lon": -91.01900939999999
- },
- "spatial_shape": {
- "coordinates": [
- [
- [
- -97.365203,
- 25.856967
- ],
- [
- -97.365203,
- 30.497478
- ],
- [
- -81.499719,
- 30.497478
- ],
- [
- -81.499719,
- 25.856967
- ],
- [
- -97.365203,
- 25.856967
- ]
- ]
- ],
- "type": "Polygon"
- },
- "theme": [
- "geospatial"
- ],
- "title": "U.S. Gulf of Mexico coast (TX, MS, AL, and FL) Macroclimate Soil Data (2013-2014)",
- "type": "dataset"
- },
- {
- "_score": 9.602544,
- "_sort": [
- 1790819307964,
- 9.602544,
- 0,
- "959410cd-6d49-4e7c-b081-6da668b4d8d1"
- ],
- "access_level": "public",
- "dcat": {
- "accessLevel": "public",
- "bureauCode": [
- "010:12"
- ],
- "contactPoint": {
- "@type": "vcard:Contact",
- "fn": "Andrew Bock",
- "hasEmail": "mailto:abock@usgs.gov"
- },
- "description": "The National Hydrologic Geospatial Fabric Reference and Derived Hydrofabrics is a geospatial dataset of connected rivers, streams, lakes, catchments, hydrologic locations, and relevant attributes to support multi-scale and integrative hydrologic modeling and analysis.\nThis child item contains features and attributes representing the National Hydrologic Geospatial Fabric Reference Hydrofabric. The Reference Hydrofabric is a hydrofabric that includes publicly-available hydrologic locations and points of interest (POIs), mainstem rivers, streams, catchments, and waterbodies linked with persistent identifiers, as well as topological, physical, and geometric feature attributes. The Reference Hydrofabric is intended for refactoring or aggregation to specific modeling purposes.\nThe item contains one Open Geospatial Consortium geopackage (gpkg) containing reference features for all of CONUS ('reference_CONUS.gpkg'), and several source spatial datasets ('reference_catchments' and 'reference_flowline'), also in gpkg format.",
- "distribution": [
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.5066/P9NFPB5S",
- "description": "Landing page for access to the data",
- "format": "XML",
- "mediaType": "application/http",
- "title": "Digital Data"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "description": "The metadata original format",
- "downloadURL": "https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.61295190d34e40dd9c06bcd7.xml",
- "format": "XML",
- "mediaType": "text/xml",
- "title": "Original Metadata"
- }
- ],
- "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_61295190d34e40dd9c06bcd7",
- "keyword": [
- "Geographic Information Systems",
- "Hydrologic Response Units",
- "Hydrologic modeling",
- "Points of Interest",
- "Routing Network",
- "USGS:61295190d34e40dd9c06bcd7",
- "environment",
- "geoscientificInformation",
- "inlandWaters"
- ],
- "modified": "2026-09-28T00:00:00Z",
- "publisher": {
- "@type": "org:Organization",
- "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"
- },
- "spatial": "-127.8381, 23.2450, -65.4261, 51.4798",
- "theme": [
- "geospatial"
- ],
- "title": "National Hydrologic Geospatial Fabric Reference Hydrofabric"
- },
- "description": "The National Hydrologic Geospatial Fabric Reference and Derived Hydrofabrics is a geospatial dataset of connected rivers, streams, lakes, catchments, hydrologic locations, and relevant attributes to support multi-scale and integrative hydrologic modeling and analysis.\nThis child item contains features and attributes representing the National Hydrologic Geospatial Fabric Reference Hydrofabric. The Reference Hydrofabric is a hydrofabric that includes publicly-available hydrologic locations and points of interest (POIs), mainstem rivers, streams, catchments, and waterbodies linked with persistent identifiers, as well as topological, physical, and geometric feature attributes. The Reference Hydrofabric is intended for refactoring or aggregation to specific modeling purposes.\nThe item contains one Open Geospatial Consortium geopackage (gpkg) containing reference features for all of CONUS ('reference_CONUS.gpkg'), and several source spatial datasets ('reference_catchments' and 'reference_flowline'), also in gpkg format.",
- "distribution_titles": [
- "Digital Data",
- "Original Metadata"
- ],
- "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/1e11f7dc-2d01-453c-8be7-963206c39785",
- "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/1e11f7dc-2d01-453c-8be7-963206c39785/raw",
- "has_download": true,
- "has_spatial": true,
- "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_61295190d34e40dd9c06bcd7",
- "keyword": [
- "Geographic Information Systems",
- "Hydrologic Response Units",
- "Hydrologic modeling",
- "Points of Interest",
- "Routing Network",
- "USGS:61295190d34e40dd9c06bcd7",
- "environment",
- "geoscientificInformation",
- "inlandWaters"
- ],
- "last_harvested_date": "2026-10-01T01:48:27.964545",
- "organization": {
- "aliases": [
- "dept"
- ],
- "code_repo_exempt": false,
- "code_repo_url": null,
- "description": null,
- "id": "143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8",
- "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png",
- "name": "Department of the Interior",
- "organization_type": "Federal Government",
- "slug": "doi"
- },
- "parent_identifier": null,
- "popularity": 0,
- "publisher": "U.S. Geological Survey",
- "slug": "national-hydrologic-geospatial-fabric-reference-hydrofabric",
- "spatial_centroid": {
- "lat": 34.538920000000005,
- "lon": -102.8733
- },
- "spatial_shape": {
- "coordinates": [
- [
- [
- -127.8381,
- 23.245
- ],
- [
- -127.8381,
- 51.4798
- ],
- [
- -65.4261,
- 51.4798
- ],
- [
- -65.4261,
- 23.245
- ],
- [
- -127.8381,
- 23.245
- ]
- ]
- ],
- "type": "Polygon"
- },
- "theme": [
- "geospatial"
- ],
- "title": "National Hydrologic Geospatial Fabric Reference Hydrofabric",
- "type": "dataset"
- },
- {
- "_score": 8.819459,
- "_sort": [
- 1790819289039,
- 8.819459,
- 1,
- "a326ccb4-1823-4a06-8ba7-f64a40297d2e"
- ],
- "access_level": "public",
- "dcat": {
- "accessLevel": "public",
- "bureauCode": [
- "010:12"
- ],
- "contactPoint": {
- "@type": "vcard:Contact",
- "fn": "Seth Siefken",
- "hasEmail": "mailto:ssiefken@usgs.gov"
- },
- "description": "This data release contains water temperature and specific conductance data from Lake Koocanusa at the international boundary (USGS site number 12300110) from November 2024 to April 2025 and November 2025 to April 2026. Data were collected every 30 minutes at depths of 3 meters (m) and 10 m below the water surface. These data were collected as part of a water-quality monitoring program in Lake Koocanusa to provide data for Federal, State, Provincial, and Tribal entities in the United States and Canada.",
- "distribution": [
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.5066/P14Q2PZS",
- "description": "Landing page for access to the data",
- "format": "XML",
- "mediaType": "application/http",
- "title": "Digital Data"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "description": "The metadata original format",
- "downloadURL": "https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.682b8051d4be024992ebd62e.xml",
- "format": "XML",
- "mediaType": "text/xml",
- "title": "Original Metadata"
- }
- ],
- "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_682b8051d4be024992ebd62e",
- "keyword": [
- "Lake Koocanusa",
- "Montana",
- "North America",
- "USGS:682b8051d4be024992ebd62e",
- "United States",
- "Upper Kootenai",
- "environment",
- "inlandWaters",
- "surface water quality",
- "water chemistry",
- "water properties",
- "water quality",
- "water temperature"
- ],
- "modified": "2026-09-28T00:00:00Z",
- "publisher": {
- "@type": "org:Organization",
- "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"
- },
- "spatial": "-115.1810, 48.9896, -115.1810, 48.9896",
- "theme": [
- "geospatial"
- ],
- "title": "Water temperature and specific conductance data for Lake Koocanusa at international boundary (ver. 2.0, September 2026)"
- },
- "description": "This data release contains water temperature and specific conductance data from Lake Koocanusa at the international boundary (USGS site number 12300110) from November 2024 to April 2025 and November 2025 to April 2026. Data were collected every 30 minutes at depths of 3 meters (m) and 10 m below the water surface. These data were collected as part of a water-quality monitoring program in Lake Koocanusa to provide data for Federal, State, Provincial, and Tribal entities in the United States and Canada.",
- "distribution_titles": [
- "Digital Data",
- "Original Metadata"
- ],
- "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/80a77b35-5815-446d-af79-34fedc33ace5",
- "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/80a77b35-5815-446d-af79-34fedc33ace5/raw",
- "has_download": true,
- "has_spatial": true,
- "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_682b8051d4be024992ebd62e",
- "keyword": [
- "Lake Koocanusa",
- "Montana",
- "North America",
- "USGS:682b8051d4be024992ebd62e",
- "United States",
- "Upper Kootenai",
- "environment",
- "inlandWaters",
- "surface water quality",
- "water chemistry",
- "water properties",
- "water quality",
- "water temperature"
- ],
- "last_harvested_date": "2026-10-01T01:48:09.039434",
- "organization": {
- "aliases": [
- "dept"
- ],
- "code_repo_exempt": false,
- "code_repo_url": null,
- "description": null,
- "id": "143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8",
- "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png",
- "name": "Department of the Interior",
- "organization_type": "Federal Government",
- "slug": "doi"
- },
- "parent_identifier": null,
- "popularity": 1,
- "publisher": "U.S. Geological Survey",
- "slug": "water-temperature-and-specific-conductance-data-for-lake-koocanusa-at-international-b-2025",
- "spatial_centroid": {
- "lat": 48.9896,
- "lon": -115.181
- },
- "spatial_shape": {
- "coordinates": [
- -115.181,
- 48.9896
- ],
- "type": "Point"
- },
- "theme": [
- "geospatial"
- ],
- "title": "Water temperature and specific conductance data for Lake Koocanusa at international boundary (ver. 2.0, September 2026)",
- "type": "dataset"
- },
- {
- "_score": 9.656008,
- "_sort": [
- 1790819029137,
- 9.656008,
- 0,
- "8fed7c8f-df07-41ed-8129-5bc96bb94125"
- ],
- "access_level": "public",
- "dcat": {
- "accessLevel": "public",
- "bureauCode": [
- "010:12"
- ],
- "contactPoint": {
- "@type": "vcard:Contact",
- "fn": "Leah Topping",
- "hasEmail": "mailto:ltopping@usgs.gov"
- },
- "description": "This data release contains input and output files for fifteen (15) MODFLOW 6 models that simulate future groundwater nitrogen transport under potential nitrogen management decisions. The development approach for the flow and transport models is described in Jahn and Walter (2026). Each scenario adjusts nitrogen inputs (Monti and others, 2024) based on communication with local stakeholders. Each scenario is simulated using the inset steady-state groundwater flow model and inset nitrogen transport model documented in a separate model application data release (Jahn and Walter, 2025).",
- "distribution": [
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.5066/P13AS3BF",
- "description": "Landing page for access to the data",
- "format": "XML",
- "mediaType": "application/http",
- "title": "Digital Data"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "description": "The metadata original format",
- "downloadURL": "https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.69304b3bd4be027594fecd98.xml",
- "format": "XML",
- "mediaType": "text/xml",
- "title": "Original Metadata"
- }
- ],
- "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_69304b3bd4be027594fecd98",
- "keyword": [
- "Long Island",
- "MODFLOW 6",
- "New York",
- "USGS:69304b3bd4be027594fecd98",
- "environment",
- "geoscientificInformation",
- "groundwater",
- "inlandWaters",
- "model",
- "modflow6",
- "nitrogen",
- "usgsgroundwatermodel"
- ],
- "modified": "2026-09-28T00:00:00Z",
- "publisher": {
- "@type": "org:Organization",
- "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"
- },
- "spatial": "-74.0665, 40.3862, -71.7916, 41.2270",
- "theme": [
- "geospatial"
- ],
- "title": "Simulations of groundwater Nitrogen nitrogen transport in the Long Island Sound Watershed, New York under potential nitrogen management scenarios"
- },
- "description": "This data release contains input and output files for fifteen (15) MODFLOW 6 models that simulate future groundwater nitrogen transport under potential nitrogen management decisions. The development approach for the flow and transport models is described in Jahn and Walter (2026). Each scenario adjusts nitrogen inputs (Monti and others, 2024) based on communication with local stakeholders. Each scenario is simulated using the inset steady-state groundwater flow model and inset nitrogen transport model documented in a separate model application data release (Jahn and Walter, 2025).",
- "distribution_titles": [
- "Digital Data",
- "Original Metadata"
- ],
- "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/a3a6434a-a8dd-4e27-bfdc-4107758388d0",
- "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/a3a6434a-a8dd-4e27-bfdc-4107758388d0/raw",
- "has_download": true,
- "has_spatial": true,
- "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_69304b3bd4be027594fecd98",
- "keyword": [
- "Long Island",
- "MODFLOW 6",
- "New York",
- "USGS:69304b3bd4be027594fecd98",
- "environment",
- "geoscientificInformation",
- "groundwater",
- "inlandWaters",
- "model",
- "modflow6",
- "nitrogen",
- "usgsgroundwatermodel"
- ],
- "last_harvested_date": "2026-10-01T01:43:49.137488",
- "organization": {
- "aliases": [
- "dept"
- ],
- "code_repo_exempt": false,
- "code_repo_url": null,
- "description": null,
- "id": "143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8",
- "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png",
- "name": "Department of the Interior",
- "organization_type": "Federal Government",
- "slug": "doi"
- },
- "parent_identifier": null,
- "popularity": 0,
- "publisher": "U.S. Geological Survey",
- "slug": "simulations-of-groundwater-nitrogen-nitrogen-transport-in-the-long-island-sound-watershed-",
- "spatial_centroid": {
- "lat": 40.722519999999996,
- "lon": -73.15654
- },
- "spatial_shape": {
- "coordinates": [
- [
- [
- -74.0665,
- 40.3862
- ],
- [
- -74.0665,
- 41.227
- ],
- [
- -71.7916,
- 41.227
- ],
- [
- -71.7916,
- 40.3862
- ],
- [
- -74.0665,
- 40.3862
- ]
- ]
- ],
- "type": "Polygon"
- },
- "theme": [
- "geospatial"
- ],
- "title": "Simulations of groundwater Nitrogen nitrogen transport in the Long Island Sound Watershed, New York under potential nitrogen management scenarios",
- "type": "dataset"
- },
- {
- "_score": 7.930263,
- "_sort": [
- 1790818927685,
- 7.930263,
- 3,
- "a5ff12e3-ae64-42e5-b5f9-73697a150cef"
- ],
- "access_level": "public",
- "dcat": {
- "accessLevel": "public",
- "bureauCode": [
- "010:12"
- ],
- "contactPoint": {
- "@type": "vcard:Contact",
- "fn": "Michael Osland",
- "hasEmail": "mailto:mosland@usgs.gov"
- },
- "description": "The northern Gulf of Mexico coast spans two major climate gradients and represents an excellent natural laboratory for developing climate-influenced ecological models. In this project, we used these zones of remarkable transition to develop macroclimate-based models for quantifying the regional responses of coastal wetland ecosystems to climate variation. In addition to providing important fish and wildlife habitat and supporting coastal food webs, these coastal wetlands provide many ecosystem goods and services including clean water, stable coastlines, food, recreational opportunities, and stored carbon. Our objective was to examine and forecast the effects of macroclimatic drivers on wetland ecosystem structure and function in the northern Gulf of Mexico.",
- "distribution": [
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.5066/F7J1017G",
- "description": "Landing page for access to the data",
- "format": "XML",
- "mediaType": "application/http",
- "title": "Digital Data"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "description": "The metadata original format",
- "downloadURL": "https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.57aa11efe4b05e859be06932.xml",
- "format": "XML",
- "mediaType": "text/xml",
- "title": "Original Metadata"
- }
- ],
- "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_57aa11efe4b05e859be06932",
- "keyword": [
- "Corpus Christi",
- "Galveston",
- "Grand Bay",
- "Gulf of Mexico",
- "Laguna Madre",
- "Port Aransas",
- "San Antonio",
- "Slidell",
- "State of Alabama",
- "State of Florida",
- "State of Louisiana",
- "State of Mississippi",
- "State of Texas",
- "Tampa Bay",
- "Ten Thousand Islands",
- "USGS:57aa11efe4b05e859be06932",
- "Weeks Bay",
- "environment",
- "vegetation"
- ],
- "modified": "2026-09-28T00:00:00Z",
- "publisher": {
- "@type": "org:Organization",
- "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"
- },
- "spatial": "-97.365203, 25.856967, -81.499719, 30.497478",
- "theme": [
- "geospatial"
- ],
- "title": "U.S. Gulf of Mexico coast (TX, MS, AL, and FL) Macroclimate Vegetation Data Section 1 (2013-2014)"
- },
- "description": "The northern Gulf of Mexico coast spans two major climate gradients and represents an excellent natural laboratory for developing climate-influenced ecological models. In this project, we used these zones of remarkable transition to develop macroclimate-based models for quantifying the regional responses of coastal wetland ecosystems to climate variation. In addition to providing important fish and wildlife habitat and supporting coastal food webs, these coastal wetlands provide many ecosystem goods and services including clean water, stable coastlines, food, recreational opportunities, and stored carbon. Our objective was to examine and forecast the effects of macroclimatic drivers on wetland ecosystem structure and function in the northern Gulf of Mexico.",
- "distribution_titles": [
- "Digital Data",
- "Original Metadata"
- ],
- "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/7e1f101e-e418-4e76-8f25-80e8590941dd",
- "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/7e1f101e-e418-4e76-8f25-80e8590941dd/raw",
- "has_download": true,
- "has_spatial": true,
- "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_57aa11efe4b05e859be06932",
- "keyword": [
- "Corpus Christi",
- "Galveston",
- "Grand Bay",
- "Gulf of Mexico",
- "Laguna Madre",
- "Port Aransas",
- "San Antonio",
- "Slidell",
- "State of Alabama",
- "State of Florida",
- "State of Louisiana",
- "State of Mississippi",
- "State of Texas",
- "Tampa Bay",
- "Ten Thousand Islands",
- "USGS:57aa11efe4b05e859be06932",
- "Weeks Bay",
- "environment",
- "vegetation"
- ],
- "last_harvested_date": "2026-10-01T01:42:07.685326",
- "organization": {
- "aliases": [
- "dept"
- ],
- "code_repo_exempt": false,
- "code_repo_url": null,
- "description": null,
- "id": "143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8",
- "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png",
- "name": "Department of the Interior",
- "organization_type": "Federal Government",
- "slug": "doi"
- },
- "parent_identifier": null,
- "popularity": 3,
- "publisher": "U.S. Geological Survey",
- "slug": "u-s-gulf-of-mexico-coast-tx-ms-al-and-fl-macroclimate-vegetation-data-section-1-2013-2014",
- "spatial_centroid": {
- "lat": 27.7131714,
- "lon": -91.01900939999999
- },
- "spatial_shape": {
- "coordinates": [
- [
- [
- -97.365203,
- 25.856967
- ],
- [
- -97.365203,
- 30.497478
- ],
- [
- -81.499719,
- 30.497478
- ],
- [
- -81.499719,
- 25.856967
- ],
- [
- -97.365203,
- 25.856967
- ]
- ]
- ],
- "type": "Polygon"
- },
- "theme": [
- "geospatial"
- ],
- "title": "U.S. Gulf of Mexico coast (TX, MS, AL, and FL) Macroclimate Vegetation Data Section 1 (2013-2014)",
- "type": "dataset"
- },
- {
- "_score": 9.501061,
- "_sort": [
- 1790817950024,
- 9.501061,
- 0,
- "3ac2da04-18f7-42a3-8be5-5572e49d82a6"
- ],
- "access_level": "public",
- "dcat": {
- "accessLevel": "public",
- "bureauCode": [
- "010:12"
- ],
- "contactPoint": {
- "@type": "vcard:Contact",
- "fn": "Andrew Bock",
- "hasEmail": "mailto:abock@usgs.gov"
- },
- "description": "The National Hydrologic Geospatial Fabric Reference and Derived Hydrofabrics is a geospatial dataset of connected rivers, streams, lakes, catchments, hydrologic locations, and relevant attributes to support multi-scale and integrative hydrologic modeling and analysis.\nA hydrofabric is a dataset of common and connected hydrologic features built around high-value community datasets and hydrologic locations. Hydrologic locations are linked to hydrofabric features, with both features and locations populated with persistent identifiers. Hydrologic locations include established sites that measure or report water quantity or quality, structures important to the storage and conveyance of surface water, such as dams and reservoirs, and important connection points such as confluences. Derived Hydrofabrics are geometrically modified versions of the Reference Hydrofabric to suit a specific modeling or analytical purpose. New geometries are created and are linked to the original reference fabric network and POIs.\nThis data release contains one reference hydrofabric and two derived hydrofabrics designed to meet specific modeling needs with different levels of consolidation and aggregation of features from the reference hydrofabric. \nThe three hydrofabrics, which are stored and described in their respective child item folders, are the:\n1) the Reference Hydrofabric, which contains publicly available hydrologic locations and POIs, mainstem rivers, streams, catchments, and waterbodies with linked persistent identifiers, as well as topological, physical, and geometric feature attributes.\n2) the Refactored Hydrofabric, a derived hydrofabric where several user-directed geometric modifications are implemented. Catchments whose flowline length is shorter than a user-defined threshold have been consolidated into larger ones and very large catchments whose flowline length is longer than a user-defined threshold are split into smaller ones to ensure a more uniform distribution of catchment size and flowpath lengths. Additionally, flowline and catchment splits are implemented at important hydrologic locations to represent their network location more precisely.\n3) Points of Interest (POI) Aggregated Hydrofabric, a derived hydrofabric where the refactored hydrofabric (described above in #2) has been aggregated around a set of hydrologic locations or POIs.\nEach of the three hydrofabrics is described within its metadata, containing a seamless geopackage for the conterminous United States and other files. See individual dataset metadata for more information.",
- "distribution": [
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.5066/P9NFPB5S",
- "description": "Landing page for access to the data",
- "format": "XML",
- "mediaType": "application/http",
- "title": "Digital Data"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "description": "The metadata original format",
- "downloadURL": "https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.60be0e53d34e86b93891012b.xml",
- "format": "XML",
- "mediaType": "text/xml",
- "title": "Original Metadata"
- }
- ],
- "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_60be0e53d34e86b93891012b",
- "keyword": [
- "Geographic Information Systems",
- "Hydrologic Response Units",
- "Hydrologic modeling",
- "Points of Interest",
- "Routing Network",
- "USGS:60be0e53d34e86b93891012b",
- "environment",
- "geoscientificInformation",
- "inlandWaters"
- ],
- "modified": "2026-09-28T00:00:00Z",
- "publisher": {
- "@type": "org:Organization",
- "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"
- },
- "spatial": "-127.8381, 23.2450, -65.4261, 51.4798",
- "theme": [
- "geospatial"
- ],
- "title": "National Hydrologic Geospatial Fabric Reference and Derived Hydrofabrics"
- },
- "description": "The National Hydrologic Geospatial Fabric Reference and Derived Hydrofabrics is a geospatial dataset of connected rivers, streams, lakes, catchments, hydrologic locations, and relevant attributes to support multi-scale and integrative hydrologic modeling and analysis.\nA hydrofabric is a dataset of common and connected hydrologic features built around high-value community datasets and hydrologic locations. Hydrologic locations are linked to hydrofabric features, with both features and locations populated with persistent identifiers. Hydrologic locations include established sites that measure or report water quantity or quality, structures important to the storage and conveyance of surface water, such as dams and reservoirs, and important connection points such as confluences. Derived Hydrofabrics are geometrically modified versions of the Reference Hydrofabric to suit a specific modeling or analytical purpose. New geometries are created and are linked to the original reference fabric network and POIs.\nThis data release contains one reference hydrofabric and two derived hydrofabrics designed to meet specific modeling needs with different levels of consolidation and aggregation of features from the reference hydrofabric. \nThe three hydrofabrics, which are stored and described in their respective child item folders, are the:\n1) the Reference Hydrofabric, which contains publicly available hydrologic locations and POIs, mainstem rivers, streams, catchments, and waterbodies with linked persistent identifiers, as well as topological, physical, and geometric feature attributes.\n2) the Refactored Hydrofabric, a derived hydrofabric where several user-directed geometric modifications are implemented. Catchments whose flowline length is shorter than a user-defined threshold have been consolidated into larger ones and very large catchments whose flowline length is longer than a user-defined threshold are split into smaller ones to ensure a more uniform distribution of catchment size and flowpath lengths. Additionally, flowline and catchment splits are implemented at important hydrologic locations to represent their network location more precisely.\n3) Points of Interest (POI) Aggregated Hydrofabric, a derived hydrofabric where the refactored hydrofabric (described above in #2) has been aggregated around a set of hydrologic locations or POIs.\nEach of the three hydrofabrics is described within its metadata, containing a seamless geopackage for the conterminous United States and other files. See individual dataset metadata for more information.",
- "distribution_titles": [
- "Digital Data",
- "Original Metadata"
- ],
- "harvest_record": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/81e5e858-b933-4359-903e-24224d352636",
- "harvest_record_raw": "https://catalog.data.gov/harvest_record/81e5e858-b933-4359-903e-24224d352636/raw",
- "has_download": true,
- "has_spatial": true,
- "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_60be0e53d34e86b93891012b",
- "keyword": [
- "Geographic Information Systems",
- "Hydrologic Response Units",
- "Hydrologic modeling",
- "Points of Interest",
- "Routing Network",
- "USGS:60be0e53d34e86b93891012b",
- "environment",
- "geoscientificInformation",
- "inlandWaters"
- ],
- "last_harvested_date": "2026-10-01T01:25:50.024816",
- "organization": {
- "aliases": [
- "dept"
- ],
- "code_repo_exempt": false,
- "code_repo_url": null,
- "description": null,
- "id": "143529f7-2eef-4a07-b227-93ac9e84fad8",
- "logo": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GSA/logo/master/doi.png",
- "name": "Department of the Interior",
- "organization_type": "Federal Government",
- "slug": "doi"
- },
- "parent_identifier": null,
- "popularity": 0,
- "publisher": "U.S. Geological Survey",
- "slug": "national-hydrologic-geospatial-fabric-reference-and-derived-hydrofabrics",
- "spatial_centroid": {
- "lat": 34.538920000000005,
- "lon": -102.8733
- },
- "spatial_shape": {
- "coordinates": [
- [
- [
- -127.8381,
- 23.245
- ],
- [
- -127.8381,
- 51.4798
- ],
- [
- -65.4261,
- 51.4798
- ],
- [
- -65.4261,
- 23.245
- ],
- [
- -127.8381,
- 23.245
- ]
- ]
- ],
- "type": "Polygon"
- },
- "theme": [
- "geospatial"
- ],
- "title": "National Hydrologic Geospatial Fabric Reference and Derived Hydrofabrics",
- "type": "dataset"
- },
- {
- "_score": 8.026884,
- "_sort": [
- 1790817759393,
- 8.026884,
- 0,
- "c57c1ac9-70f2-4432-9b0e-8e163df376e6"
- ],
- "access_level": "public",
- "dcat": {
- "accessLevel": "public",
- "bureauCode": [
- "010:12"
- ],
- "contactPoint": {
- "@type": "vcard:Contact",
- "fn": "Christopher A Custer",
- "hasEmail": "mailto:cacuster@usgs.gov"
- },
- "description": "This data release contains updated predictions of fish community metrics from Krause and Maloney (2021) and Maloney et al. (2022). The analysis to produce these predictions follows the same analytical procedure described in Maloney et al. (2022) but at an enhanced spatial (1:24,000 scale) and temporal (annual predictions from 1985 - 2023) resolutions. The fish sampling data used to calculate these metrics were assembled from multiple monitoring programs conducted by state and federal agencies, county governments, universities, and river basin commissions throughout the watershed. Community metrics characterize fish assemblages in terms of composition, tolerance, habitat use, and functional traits. Analyses were performed across four aggregated Level III ecoregions: the Coastal Plains (CPL); the Northern Appalachians (NAP); the Southern Appalachians Northwest (SAP_NW), and the Southern Appalachians Piedmont (SAP_PIED; see Maloney et al. 2022 for more detail on these regions). Predictions were calculated for each regionally selected fish community metric annually from 1985 to 2023. These predictions were further summarized into deciles with higher scores inferring less biologically altered (i.e., better) conditions. Uncertainty measures were also calculated for annual predictions and summarized into deciles such that higher scores represent lower uncertainty measures. This data release includes watershed‑wide predictions—both overall and by ecoregion—along with the R project used to conduct the analysis. The R project contains the model input data, annual basin‑wide habitat predictors, and the R scripts required to generate annual fish community metric predictions for each catchment across the watershed. This data release also contains a README markdown file that provides a more detailed description of the analytical workflow and associated data objects.",
- "distribution": [
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.5066/P13DHM2D",
- "description": "Landing page for access to the data",
- "format": "XML",
- "mediaType": "application/http",
- "title": "Digital Data"
- },
- {
- "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
- "description": "The metadata original format",
- "downloadURL": "https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.6a2c1f6c1ba49b14390b0bcf.xml",
- "format": "XML",
- "mediaType": "text/xml",
- "title": "Original Metadata"
- }
- ],
- "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_6a2c1f6c1ba49b14390b0bcf",
- "keyword": [
- "Chesapeake Bay watershed",
- "District of Columbia (national district)",
- "Maryland (state)",
- "New York (state)",
- "Pennsylvania (state)",
- "USGS:6a2c1f6c1ba49b14390b0bcf",
- "Virginia (state)",
- "West Virginia (state)",
- "biota",
- "environment",
- "fish assemblage",
- "habitats",
- "inlandWaters",
- "natural resource assessment",
- "prediction",
- "random forest"
- ],
- "modified": "2026-09-28T00:00:00Z",
- "publisher": {
- "@type": "org:Organization",
- "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"
- },
- "spatial": "-80.6538, 36.5793, -74.4593, 43.0773",
- "theme": [
- "geospatial"
- ],
- "title": "Updated model predictions of fish community metrics for nontidal streams in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed, USA from 1985 to 2023"
- },
- "description": "This data release contains updated predictions of fish community metrics from Krause and Maloney (2021) and Maloney et al. (2022). The analysis to produce these predictions follows the same analytical procedure described in Maloney et al. (2022) but at an enhanced spatial (1:24,000 scale) and temporal (annual predictions from 1985 - 2023) resolutions. The fish sampling data used to calculate these metrics were assembled from multiple monitoring programs conducted by sta